Exploring Pioneering Theories of Non-Local Consciousness - Research Prize Event

During a live event on November 1st, we recognized the 2024 winners of the Linda G. O’Bryant Noetic Sciences Research Prize and explored their captivating reviews on theories of non-local consciousness. This annual $100,000 award recognizes groundbreaking research on non-local consciousness, a concept that challenges the conventional view of consciousness as being solely generated by the brain.
Learn More about the Prize and Winners: noetic.org/prize
Join our Global Community noetic.org/?utm...
Learn more about IONS research noetic.org/sci...
Join us for free ConnectIONS Live webinars: noetic.org/expe...
Try our free online course: noetic.org/exp...

[@rossmcleod7983]

Fantastic discussion, big thankyou to the winners and the Institute for driving this extraordinary field of research into the mainstream.

[@SiHetherington]

I’d love to see each essay presented with graphics, research and ideally a summary of each section for those of us who aren’t as well versed in many of the scientific disciplines.

[@brianmcglade8164]

Thank you for this post. Best regards, Chicago Illinois

[@HelloUniverse1526]

Another theory you should consider is the ‘meta’physical model offered by Dondaneua that was recently released….just saying it kind of makes the most sense of it all….his magnum opus book is called Simplicity Through Simulation: The Algorithm of Humanity. Was released June 6th, 2024. (I think it's a D-day pun?). Look at it, consider it, and read it if you dare. Maybe a paradigm shifter…. Just maybe.….

[@Dr.Scholl]

😮😮😮😮😮

[@HelloUniverse1526]

It essentially provides your folks with what appears to be a complete theory. Just saying, it might help You can only find him on sub-stack. Search for Karl K Dondaneau. We are triggering a paradigm shift if you all wanna partake 😂

[@LoriMotola]

The categories of consciousness ... gold.

[@art3nem]

Brilliant work and easy to follow conclusions of Cameron!

[@A3Kr0n]

Your God is whatever you put your faith in.

[@clarissasawyer5488]

1. Excellent presentation! Very exciting! I look forward to further activities to try to arrive at some consensus on these theories. 2. I don't know if insights from teachers of these abilities have been tapped to understand the range of different types of abilities and different skill levels. For example, within Theosophy, Kurt Leland has been writing and teaching about different states of consciousness for decades. Or, the teaching of psychic mediumship, remote viewing, or channeling, or UAP Contact. There are national and international associations that certify teachers and students. How might their insights assist in theory development? Keep up the amazing work! ❤

[@WILLIAMMALO-kv5gz]

How "Pure Energy" if it is in reality existent? forms and reforms itself continually into physical or apparent physical form, is an ongoing mystery to me at least. Still working on it...I never go far without bumping into "Infinity". Still working on what "INFINITY" is in reality?... Thanks for a very interesting video...

[@ArlindoPhilosophicalArtist]

We are the eternal witness. Reality is a mental construct shared by many conscious observers. On my channel, I explain why metaphysical idealism should be the default position-not materialism, as such a view suffers from the hard problem of consciousness, which is an impasse, and physicalist metaphysics itself violates Occam's razor.

[@Justin-wj4yc]

#1 Mind can't be made of mind so mind is double aspect. #2. Where is your evidence conscious control exists? #3. Materialism != eliminative materialism.

[@Interstellar00.00]

This prize should go for pioneer pio Fernandes from goa india to holding Ai recognized AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) status.

[@gkannon77]

I'm not sure Christof Koch would say IIT is physicalist. I think he's agnostic on an ontology. "The brain behaves how it does BECAUSE of the nature of the experience it generates". Not visa versa.

[@WILLIAMMALO-kv5gz]

True, we may be individual units of a greater whole but some of us are very nasty units indeed.

[@silberlinie]

Is it this kind of mubo jumbo we all love?

[@johnchase2148]

Seeing an example is not believable, kist theories Sounds like you would rather not lnow and lose the job of the search.