F1 24 PS5 vs PC RTX 4080 4K 60 FPS Ultra Graphics Comparison

F1 24 PS5 vs PC RTX 4080 4K 60 FPS Ultra Graphics Comparison
Buy F1 24 here: amzn.to/3R5aQVL
Thanks for using my Amazon Affiliate link!
Enjoying my videos? Consider supporting me on Patreon: / cycu1
or directly on KZbin: / @cycu1
PC Gameplay was captured in 4K Ultra Settings (DLSS Balanced) on following rig:
-Gigabyte RTX 4080 Eagle OC 16GB amzn.to/3pYRibp
-Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite AX amzn.to/3rD1sit
-Gigabyte UD1300GM PG5 amzn.to/43toTIc
-Intel i7 13700K amzn.to/3rAzGD5
-Corsair Vengeance DDR5 32GB amzn.to/43x9pmr
-Samsung 980 Pro SSD 2TB / 1TB / 500GB amzn.to/44WEl0F
-Barracuda 4TB HDD amzn.to/3DmANZD
-Windows 11 amzn.to/3PYzmIy
-Be quiet! Silent Loop 2 360mm amzn.to/3KawpRl
-Be quiet! Pure Base 600 BGW20 amzn.to/44y2lam
Thanks for using my Amazon Affiliate links!
Timestamps
Monaco Pre-race Intro 00:00
Stills 00:44
PS5 Quality Mode FPP Gameplay 02:24
PC FPP Gameplay 03:49
FPP Side-by-Side 05:08
PS5 Quality Mode TPP Gameplay 06:30
PC TPP Gameplay 07:59
TPP Side-by-Side 09:21
Red Bull Ring Pre-race Intro 10:38
Stills 11:09
PS5 Quality Mode FPP Gameplay 12:49
PC FPP Gameplay 14:17
FPP Side-by-Side 15:45
PS5 Quality Mode FPP Gameplay 17:15
PC FPP Gameplay 18:44
FPP Side-by-Side 20:18
Kanał GRANALIZA po polsku:
/ @granaliza
Cycu1 Bilibili official Channel: space.bilibili.com/3537123885...
Consider supporting my channel for cool bonuses:
/ @cycu1
Looking good quality gameplay for your own videos?
Consider subscribing my other channels to be up to date!
Cycu1 Xbox Archive / @cycu1xboxarchive130
Cycu1 PlayStation Archive / @cycu1playstationarchi...
Cycu1 Nintendo Archive / @cycu1nintendoarchive454
Looking for gift cards?
PSN: amzn.to/3eFkAjM
Xbox: amzn.to/3gzvsl8
Nintendo eShop: amzn.to/2TRMbqf
Looking for RTX Graphics Cards? Check on Amazon: amzn.to/3dzcGYZ
Follow me on Twitter: / cyckiewicz
Find me on Facebook: / cycu1yt
Cycu1's friends:
Jabcook:
/ jabcook
Easy Unboxing:
/ @easyunboxing
Quick Expert Reviews
/ @quickexpertreviews
FA Gamez:
/ mrxboxgamer007
#eapartner #F12024 #ps5 #PS4 #RTX4080 #F124

[@Cycu1]

🌟 Got an idea for my next graphics comparison? I’d love to hear your suggestions! Drop your ideas in the comments, and I’ll see what I can do 😉. Your likes, shares, and channel support mean the world to me and help make this channel awesome! 🙌 🎉 Support me on Patreon: www.patreon.com/Cycu1 🎮 Join the KZbin channel: kzbin.info/door/D3rfp47a3xZuqHhllcIvIAjoin 🛒 Use my affiliate links to buy games and other stuff on Amazon: amzn.to/3LJq6Vk Thanks for being amazing and helping this community grow! 🚀

[@shaolinmaster8583]

Bro KZbin uses an upscaler

[@danny200mph5]

The 4080 GPU alone is almost 3x the price of PS5. Basically, both look the same. Play on a TV from 6 feet away, and you won't tell any difference.

[@Rolkey]

Idk native 4K and upscaled 4K look completely different, I would know cause I have a 4K display in my house and comparing it to my 1440p monitor it’s way clearer and sharper.

[@Alexander_Sergeevich_80]

the difference is in the nuances of background shading and working with lighting. These nuances greatly affect the final performance. In such scenarios, SONY PS would simply die, because the load from such small graphical nuances is simply colossal.

[@bad_to_the_bone4431]

Try a more demanding game and you will see why the 4080 costs so much more. It's the fps. You have to play demanding games on 30 fps at 4k, on PS5.

[@antoniocalimero1173]

This is a simple game.. Real gamers play only on PC

[@Jonathan-bv7qs]

​@@antoniocalimero1173real gamers 😂😂😂

[@Emulator_Crossing]

You can clearly see all those game nowdays really not push the pc high end gpus. they are still build for the ps4 as the basic console.

[@Polengue]

So, is the ps4 holding back this generation techinical wise? 🤔

[@Emulator_Crossing]

@@Polengue imo, yes. the 4080 is soo much stronger and capable if games were specifically were made for it.

[@ColdFear6666]

@@Emulator_Crossing games are made for consoles first, with console hardware in mind, than they're ported to PC. That's how it is since like the PS2 times.

[@Emulator_Crossing]

@@ColdFear6666 yes

[@Rolkey]

@@ColdFear6666Not indie games.

[@perihelion7445]

It's like the days of comparing an Amiga 1200 to a PC in 1993. Yeah the PC had more grunt but you had to spend 3 times more. I prefer the PC over Consoles but PC gaming at this level is for a single guy in his 20's or 30's that can afford it. Consoles for most people are more cost effective.

[@blueferrari397]

Any reasons on 60FPS? Both are capable of 120hZ. Also is Ray Tracing activated on PC. I have the 4080 and can't seem to get great graphics unless I turn DLSS off.

[@smoothyuk]

Xbox and PC may be capable of 120 but KZbin isn't, also PS5 running 120 would have the dynamic resolution constantly dipping visuals below 4K further hampering a like for like comparison.

[@PAUTNETER]

yeah I have a 4080 and I never turn on DLSS. It takes away some of the quality and you can tell easy.

[@ccycca5380]

I'm watching this with 65inch TV from 7ft away and I can see differences, image is sharper with the 4080

[@moiwill]

WoW PS5 ! 👀🥰

[@mlachance001]

Advantage of pc is that you can choose from a lot of different Direct Drive Brand, also you can play it with triple screen.

[@iwatchfamilyguy]

For people that never used a 4080 it’s not even close you can play games at 4k at like 200fps compared to 60fps

[@FLASHAHOLIC_TV]

On my 60hz pc monitor?

[@dokferr]

​@@FLASHAHOLIC_TVNo one is gonna paired RTX 4080 with 60 Hz monitor

[@DavidGonzalez-y2v]

So..? Bro. THEY LOOK ALMOST EXACTLY THE SAME. Just turn ray tracing on and you won't even tell a difference. 😂

[@shaolinmaster8583]

​@DavidGonzalez-y2v that's because the video has been compressed and upscaled by youtube.....if you can tell the difference it's going to negligible at best idk y this guy even posted it but the first time u see a pc running native resolution it hurts your eyes to look at no joke

[@glorfindel75]

The comparison makes no sense because the graphic settings of the PC version are missing. For a game like this it is clear that the difference in 4K at 60 fps is not much: the two platforms should be compared for much heavier titles, at the same or similar settings. For example, those for whom PS5 does not go beyond 30 fps or struggles to reach 60 fps. In this regard, the actual fps counter is missing and the uploaded video makes the PC version seem jerky. Why? The comparison is not "honest".

[@ferdi0ne784]

The screen/image on the PC shakes too much and the track billboards (left and right) including fences are too distracting because of the shakes. The Screen/image on the PS5 Looks more smooth and still sharp.

[@gertsy2000]

Where is the FPS counter in the top RHS of the screen? That's what matters when everything else looks the same.

[@MrRiverwind]

Nothing like a good PC to play games and all the other tasks that it allows you to do with it. Many years of supreme gaming happiness. Greetings! 😉.

[@SavingPrivateBob]

Much more clarity on the PC of course, but the shadows are too soft. I like me some sharp shadows personally

[@garysmith8455]

Just built my very first FLIGHT SIM. The custom PC was front and center. So, I equipped it with the INTEL i9 14 gen, and a 4080 Super and LOTS of memory and cooling throughout the system because I am running 3 - 55" screens in 4K ! PS2 ? I don't think it could muster the FPS rate I am enjoying! NEVER have I had much more then a 13 year old i7 PC. So this is a totally NEW experience for this old guy 😊

[@tonemack2981]

Negligible difference. You wouldn't notice unless you have them side by side, and even then you have to be looking for it. The difference does not justify the price gap, not worth it if you ask me.

[@pcgamerzzzchannel3407]

It only justify , if you play all type of games at 4k 144hz and msfs in vr , definitely worth the money.

[@mv223]

In this game maybe. It's a straight up PS5 port. Very similar on both, but if you play on pc, it's definitely a better experience even on a simple port like this one.

[@oioboo]

Spend 500% more to get 10% more graphics! Smart move!

[@bad_to_the_bone4431]

No, spend it to play demanding games on more than 30 fps lol.

[@sorinpopa1442]

lol u know u can spend way less to get the same experience on pc with cheaper gpus ? from amd for exemple ? but keep telling u that to keep justify a console purchase , while the latest 3A games are already back to the 30 fps cap for a while by now ^^ imagine the next future when most games will fully switch to UE 5.

[@LilBrujoFH18]

As an audiophile it’s worse. Heard some amazing sounds from a $1500 setup to a $50,000 setup. %10 difference

[@leonardolemos9588]

I'm from the PC team but I think that in comparison with an RTX 4060ti all 4K 60 fps this game costs 1/4 of the value, it shows that the GPU usage should not exceed 60%

[@HiddenGameGems]

Nobody spends more on a PC just for gaming, PC is handy for video editing, screen captures, free online, you can download some games for free, cheap key discounts, emulation, game modding so no need for extra DLC's, pursue other hobbies, you'll actually end up saving money and can have more flexibility with it like choosing between controllers or a mouse and keyboard.

[@fly2334]

雨滴效果 应该还有被风吹的感觉，还有 在转弯时应该还有左右流向的

[@fly2334]

现在看上去 感觉像静态流动

[@skayme]

Totalmente cierto.

[@rwieber79]

As far as stock gaming as 60 FPS goes the PS5 makes sense, but this isn't taking advantage of mods with shaders and other graphic enhancements that can be done on PC that you cannot on Console. Not to mention so many more games available on PC and many times at lower prices than console games. This is the reason I am currently planning my first Gaming PC or Laptop purchase and I've been a console gamer as a kid in the 80's with Atari 2600 through all of the Nintendo's, then Sega and every Playstation up to and including my current PS5.

[@dspark2131]

A madman who puts his nose in the monitor and works hard to find a difference would buy a 4080. Isn't 4K actually meaningless for most people who have poor eyesight due to myopia or astigmatism in the first place? Even if the screen is clear, what you see with your eyes is blurry.

[@ciroalessandro2339]

mas quanto está usando de cada hardware? 20% da 4080 e 100% do Play5?

[@issacohasi]

Concordo, mas no final o resultado nao é omesmo? Hw foi feito para ir no limite. Se o sw nao acompanha fica nisso.

[@leanderx]

Em jogo de corrida querem testar? Kkkkk faz o mesmo teste com jogo que realmente tem gráficos. Tenta aí cyberpunk, RD, assassin's kkkkkk pra começo de papo, nem ou melhor. Digita aí batefield 4 16k e vão ver placas de 15 anos atrás aniquilar ps5 . Compete com Xbox, querer comparar com pc nem te. Cabimento

[@ciroalessandro2339]

​@@issacohasina minha opiniao vai ser o mesmo se travar a 60 fps, poŕem sem limite a 4080 deve ir a 300 fps, enquanto o play 5 a 62 fps? E em jogos pesados será q o play aguenta 4k uktra a 30 fps? Na minha opiniao console já era, ainda comparar com uma 4080 acho q chega a ser engraçado.

[@jannekschushek9577]

Cold be also done on Genesis 32x flat Shading Polygon, 21 FPS

[@stephenhood2948]

PC will always be better, but cost way more. It all depends what you want out of it. I love the visual eye candy, my 4070 looks fantastic on a 1440p monitor, but for way under half the price I could have bought a PS5.

[@chocolate5217]

I own a PS5, a 4070 ti PC and a 2060 PC, the graphic quality between these systems in most games is very similar. The biggest plus of the 4070 is not the visual quality, but that you can play games with good FPS (like Cyberpunk) and to play VR games where you need a lot of horse power to get to 140 fps to reduce motion sickness. Bottom linn the difference into max settings and lower ones in most cases is not that noticeable, buy a new GPU when you can´t run your fav game at acceptable frame rates with lower settings.Just my 2 cents

[@nunopenaspt]

PS5 Pro will increase the stakes even further, the price/performance ratio will be unbeatable.

[@chocolate5217]

@@nunopenaspt A ps5 pro nunca terá quecorrer coisas a 8k 140hz, que é o que será preciso em alguns jogos de vr

[@rafaelrochars]

Anyone who tries playing above 60 FPS never wants to go back to 30, this is not possible on the PS5

[@mikelreborn3254]

Your PC will outlast that PS5 by 6 years, well worth the money not being stuck in a console eco system, as a PC gamer and ex console gamer PC will always be a better choice...the game selection is off the chain...I have a 4070 now and love it.

[@dennisbrown5995]

Have a 4080 on my PC, but there has been a lot of games on pc that are poorly optimized and find myself playing on PS5 instead because it runs better on console. In a lot of cases yes PC is king but not always.

[@mikelreborn3254]

@@dennisbrown5995 that's true most PC games aren't optimized..I use lossless scaling and MSI afterburner and RivaTuner Statistics Server, and can get some better performance...

[@health4430]

@@dennisbrown5995 and u can still use mouse and keyboard on console as well

[@RicoOCHO85]

Launch between the ps4 and ps5 was 10ish years...in pc times that's like a century..

[@ddzang]

Except for the exorbitant gpu prices!

[@eastender74]

There’s one thing video games have yet to truly perfect. That is characters or in this case an F1 car moving on the ground but not seem like their floating. I see it too many times whether it’s someone’s feet or in this case tires are just not convincing enough to seem totally real.

[@MrFreezeProduct]

I know what you mean, but Gran Turismo never seemed off to me in replays.

[@mickyryan8474]

ye when you play you notice its the road moving not the car

[@chrissyboy7047]

I noticed the same thing in F1 23 when ray tracing was turned off. The car doesn't seem to connect to the road. I think ray tracing helps smooth that out a bit

[@Fokfeesspecial]

imagine the comparison against a ps5 pro. if it will cost 500 euro still i would play on that.

[@leonardolemos9588]

I'm from the PC team but I think that in comparison with an RTX 4060ti all 4K 60 fps this game costs 1/4 of the value, it shows that the GPU usage should not exceed 60%

[@rayharvey1330]

That bar in the middle in 1st person mode...is kinda annoying to look at. It obscure the view and my eyes keep getting draw to it. It might break the realism...but I'd like to have an option to make that middle bar invisible.

[@qualitycertifiedbass]

Not worth to pay that much for PC if you only buy it for gaming.

[@DOC187able]

PS5 is optimized it runs great

[@Baro_VG]

Pues teniendo en cuenta el precio de uno y otro, la PS5 cumple con creces 👌

[@SweetFlexZ]

Bro, no necesitas una 4080 para mover este juego xD

[@Baro_VG]

@@SweetFlexZ Pues por eso mismo. Pero el precio de un pc que lo mueva similar a la PS5, es mas caro que la consola.

[@SweetFlexZ]

@@Baro_VG un pc tiene un precio de entrada mayor, pero ya está, luego con lo que te cuestan los juegos en consola mejor te hubieras montado un pc xD

[@fairlightmusic]

I think the graphic engine seems to be not the newest one. Normally you see the differences between PS and PC.

[@shaolinmaster8583]

Difference is going almost impossible to tell when your uploading a video on KZbin because of the compression KZbin uses

[@Dookie69uk]

They could have done so much more on a monster PC, but appart from obviously a higher resolution and better shadows its pretty much a straight PS5 port. Shame.

[@shaolinmaster8583]

You do realize because KZbin doesn't run at native resolution they will be virtually the same because both images are being filtered through the same upscaler

[@petern.3153]

PS5 Technology Hardware at Late 2020 RTX4080 Technology Hardware at Late 2022 it's fair ?

[@fpvpilot7713]

Ps5 looks good enought but that judder and blur gives me a head ache. As always consoles are too weak to run high resolution and fps at the same time unlike a pc. Thats why I have a gaming pc. I have a ps5 for Stellar blade only, when the game comes to pc I am selling the ps5 for lack of power.

[@x.jeonkookie.x2428]

No difference. Ps5 is better for the price

[@1TN]

you won't see the difference on KZbin which is limited to 60fps

[@x.jeonkookie.x2428]

@@1TN i don t need best graphics. 4K is enough for me just now

[@dajaxman]

the differences are minor GPU only comes in to play if you have the right monitor which will take advantage, i take my pc (3080) over my consoles if i was better fps

[@Timmeh_The_tyrant]

Lets not forget that the PS5 is a custom mid range AMD graphics GPU thats basically the same as an RX 6700

[@yoshifmadoka4543]

NVIDIA has finally caught up with the technology 4 years ago.

[@dnlwood32]

I use a 4080 super and feel that this video doesnt really reflect what a gfx card like thus is all about. For starters that game is not taking full advantage of the 4080 at all. But secondly the 4080 allows me to run triple screens at frame rates that vannot be even considered on PS5. I would say however that PS5 is the way to go for most casual gamers, because it will give you what you need in most cases. Try running alan wake 2 at PCs top settings (path tracing) on a PS5. Do we need to play at those settings? Nope but it adds so much atmosphere.

[@waynekieft4952]

All I can see is the pc version is a bit sharper!!

[@microgitech1000]

KZbin does not allow native quality. But yes, the value for money is superior on PS5 then on small configurations... Large PCs are good for big players, because they are more pleasant.

[@Doodz22]

I owned 3080 and Ps5! Trust me you won’t see any difference watching side by side comparisons in KZbin cause video quality here is compromised! But in reality graphics and details with my 3080 is noticeable ❤

[@ivandomaia]

I was unsure whether to buy a gaming PC with RTX 4080, in the end I bought a PS5 and a MacBook pro M3 and was actually a great choice.

[@pcgamerzzzchannel3407]

depends on what you play, high refreshrate 4k monitor +DLSS is a big for win for fps.

[@ivandomaia]

@@pcgamerzzzchannel3407 But I play 2K 120hz with the PS5, I'm not a big game fan, just play eventually Call of Duty, some Soccer game and one or other campaign games and GTA, and not every week. So, PS5 was actually really good to me, I play Call of Duty with Mouse and Keyboard and to be sincerely the only one game from PC I would like to play is the Counter Strike, that's the only one that really made me think of buying a gamer laptop, but not enough reason to make me going on PC. I'm happy with the PS5 and a laptop only to work.

[@cptairwolf]

Kind of suspicious just how good consoles can look compared to GPUs costing 3 times as much and being supposedly far more feature rich. We PC gamers are getting swindled.

[@AexoeroV]

Im a console guy that recently built a PC(4080 Super GPU, i9 13900K CPU, etc) for all kind of needs and i also play on it and let me tell you something, i love consoles but on this PC i run games like Alan Wake 2 and Cyberpunk 2077 in 4K HDR with path ray tracing and the highest possible settings and hooked up to an OLED TV this games looks amazing, with DLSS set on quality plus FG, depending on the title i get like 60-80 FPS, if i turn off FG i still get over 30-50 FPS, but i repet, this are titles like i mentioned, very demanding ones because the 4080 Super is capable of way more frames in other titles even with maxed out settings. There is no comparison, Cyberpunk with highest settings and highest possible ray tracing ootions just look incredible in HDR on an OLED TV, i haven't experienced such level of ray tracing on consoles. The PC was built slowly part by part and i searched for deals and offers, it costed me 2200 euros and the GPU was exactly half of this price but imwould say it was worth it, im playing with a controller on the PC like im used too from the consoles and this PC will be used for some work too so i needed it. I will still own and love consoles but i just needed to tell that a PC with games that utilizes the GPU to the max there is a difference and im woowed sometimes. I still think that if someone do not have a budget to build such a PC a console offers a very good experience for the price and its not the end of the world if you dont experience max ray tracing and ultra settings, i lastly played Spiderman 2 on my PS5 and i very much enjoyed the title, it looked good and had some good ray tracing too!

[@sonygokulkrishnan7506]

Brother How It's 100 percent work it's only Screen Recorders job Not real output because side by side same two monitors play two console and pc run same content on one screen with High resolution Camera recording with frame rate same now it's working 100 percent

[@marktran630]

Nvidia RTX 4080 has better details, sharper, and better shadows ect. When you factor in the price of the Nvidia video card plus the PC, you will most likely be paying a miyof 5X of the price of the PS5. No doubt the PS5 is king when it comes to price vs performance ratio.

[@ziginaigra]

u can buy rx6750xt for 330$ if u live in usa ...that gpu is stronger than ps5 gpu

[@marktran630]

@@ziginaigra AMD is definitely a bigger bang for your buck when it comes to price vs performance ratio in both processors and graphics cards.

[@nunopenaspt]

I also have a High end PC and a PS5, I only play FPS on the PC, for all the rest I prefer to play on the PS5 on a 55'' OLED TV (it's a lot better experience). My PC screens are both 4k, but 28''. Everybody only compares the price of the Graphic Card, you have to add the price of the all PC, and a High End PC these days cost around 6.000€, that's the price of about 12 PS5.

[@AexoeroV]

But why dont you connect your PC via one HDMI port from your GPU to your OLED? Only consoles can do that? No, you can use you 55 inch OLED TV for PC gaming too and you can also use your DualSense controller with your PC!! And on what earth are you living? I built a PC (4080 Super GPU, 13900K CPu, 32GB 6600mhz DRR5, ATX 3.0 PSU, Z790 MB, 360 AIO cooler, 1TB 980 Pro SSD, etc) with 2200 euros

[@ENFDO]

So, why buy a U$s 2000 PC instead a U$s 450 Ps5 when the game looks and play equal in both systems.

[@Usersf134ssk]

Coz you wouldnt be playing f1 24 only? 😂 Ps5 is nice but some games look and play better on PC version 😊

[@ENFDO]

@@Usersf134ssk so thats why u would spend 2000 uss grands instead of 450 uss right buddy?

[@pcgamerzzzchannel3407]

@@ENFDO you forgot to mention DLSS , its blatantly obvious the ps5 is heavely underpowered compared to a 4080 super build , 4080 super is capable to play bf 2042 with 128 players at 100+ fps at ultra settings DLSS Quality 4K. High framerates much better overall graphics performance is definitely the money worth

[@ENFDO]

@@pcgamerzzzchannel3407 how many fps more buddy?

[@nuexxeun2187]

In the past, the difference was very big. PS2 vs PC, PS3, PS4… now the gap is getting smaller. What will it be like in 2028 with the PS6?

[@mv223]

Not really. In this instance, the PC is clearer of course, but for the most part it's just a straight up PS5 port. PC is leaps and bounds beyond PS5, but this game doesn't show it all that much other than fps and resolution, which KZbin don't show of course. Also, imagine what PCs will be like in 2028.

[@tardraker4631]

PS5 450 us vs PC 2000 us

[@nossy232323]

Don't forget monthly fees and higher game prices.

[@nickxcore74]

@@nossy232323Don’t forget the motherboard, processor, case, memory, power supply and monitor etc.

[@nossy232323]

@@nickxcore74 Those are all already paid for as I use my PC for non gaming tasks too.

[@1TN]

30 fps vs 300 fps

[@tardraker4631]

@@1TN en ps5 va a 60/120fps, cualquiera que esté acostumbrado a 144hz lo nota a lejos.

[@user-ig5ce7ds7e]

Wow the ps5 is pretty dope! That nvidia card alone is 2x the price of the ps.. I’m sold.. ❤

[@S4r0m]

Pc costs more, that's right. But that game doesn't push the 4080 to it's limits, while that's the best the ps5 can do. In the end, you pay more for a pc that can play all the ps5 games and most of the upcoming generation, a huge games catalog for cheap and some even free, more and better accessories, etc. There's no way to deny PC offers you the best gaming experience. So if you have the money, why not use the best instead of the consoles?

[@THE.TUNE.PRODUCTIONS]

Die Frage ist, ob sich der Unterschied überhaupt lohnt. 1280 x 720 Pixel solten Standard sein. Immer noch. Oder 1600 x 900, wer es "höher" mag. Der Rest ist Quatsch bei einem Computerspiel. Paradebeispiel ist, wie mancher "Experten" meinen, sie müssten "Giana Sisters" oder "Super Mario Brothers" in 4K zeigen. Das lohnt sich ja auch gerade bei den alten Spielen (Sarkasmus), weil in Wirklichkeit kann die Grafik dieser Spiele in 4K gar nicht besser aussehen. Egal, wie hoch da die Auflösung ist. Weil das Original ja schon nicht dafür ausgelegt ist. Und bei 4K hat man selbstverständlich einen viel höheren Stromverbrauch - darauf soll eigentlich auch mein Kommentar abzielen. Und bei 8K können die ganzen "Gamerexperten" dann umrüsten zu noch Leistungshungrigeren Grafikkarten. Und nein: Ich bin neidisch. Ich finde es dämlich... PS: Spiele sollten mit 45 FPS limitiert sein. Reicht völlig aus bei niedrigeren Auflösungen. Je kleiner die Auflösung, umso niedriger kann die FPS sein. Je höher die Auflösung, umsehr mehr FPS sind vonnöten, damit man das Gefühl hat, das Bild sei flüssig dargestellt. Hier sind die Menschen "unvernünftig" seit Jahren. Und es wird leider nicht besser. Noch ein PS: Dabei "checkt" man gar nicht den "grafischen Unterschied" zwischen niedrigerer Auflösung und "4K". Weil... wenn man spielt, achtet man nicht darauf. Das Bild bewegt sich doch dann sowieso die ganze Zeit. Fazit: Was für ein Schwachsinn. Das Problem ist, dass "Gamestar" und andere Verlage den Leuten seit 10, 15 Jahren exakt so einen Mü.. suggierieren, dass höhrere Auflösungen auch besser seien bzw. "720p" alt und unbrauchbar seien... Na ja... Ich habe bei dem 32-Zoll 1600x900. Bei einem 24-Zoll reichen 720p. Mehr nicht. Höheres gibt es hier nicht bei mir, weil es einfach unnötig sind. Es macht keinen Sinn. Auch die Augen müssen das mitmachen. Nur mal so nebenbei. Und jetzt schaut euch mal an, wie viele Menschen in den Augen-Ambulanzen (jeden Tag) sitzen... Das hat - ein bisschen was - auch DAMIT zu tun... Abgesehen davon muss man auch mal auf den Gedanken kommen, dass bei einer höheren Auflösung die Lochmaske des Bildschirms auch mitmachen muss - sonst bringt das nämlich nichts... Aber egal. Stromverbrauch ist ja auch total egal. (Wen interessiert denn schon die Umwelt?) :-) Ich "freue" mich schon seit circa 1-2 Jahren, wenn alle (Leute), also besonders die Gamer-"Experten", von 4K auf 8K umsiedeln, weil dann 4K "halt zu alt ist". Oder am besten gleich auf 12K. Weil "4K" reicht ja nicht mehr, das ist doch alt.

[@Paul-if1jq]

In the game it hard to see the difference, certainly not worth the extra £1000

[@TheLuizguedes]

For the money, ps5 is doing a great job

[@josesoto4440]

I like the PS5.

[@youuuuuuuuuuutube]

So the ps5 looks the same as a high end pc costing 3x the price. Imagine what the PS5 pro will do :O How many years is it going to take for PC to catch up?

[@giovannialfano5979]

How to waste a 4080. Anyway the AMD-PS5 is still a little tech-miracle.

[@chrisvashck1141]

The only fair comparison would be a game made for PC ported to the consoles , then we will see the advantage of PC to the fullest. Consoles are the reason why PC games are not as pushed forward as they could have been. Look at Ghost of Tsushima , game is gorgeous but if that was designed just for PC we would have 2x the details + RT ( maybe even PT) but now my 4080 is pushing +200fps @ 1440p maxed out . Console players have 0 clue when they are saying 30fps or 60fps is great .Remember , people were happy with black and white television for a very long time . Its simply a BS .

[@bungie47]

Il y a longtemps que j'ai abandonné l'idée de jouer sur PC carte graphique trop coûteuse pour avoir un bon résultat graphique dommage je me suis orienté sur console où on a rendu quasi identique et pour trois fois moins cher......

[@modaride]

so PS5 is a bargain

[@Geekhobby]

No, not really. But compared with GPUs it is.

[@madnnis]

please force x16 anisotropic filtering through the nvidia control panel. the textures look 100x better with this. instead of these n64 washed out textures if you leave this at 0

[@buckzx12r]

Id like to see it with a rtx4090!

[@treebusettt]

amazing graphic .. play with 240p res

[@misiosmrodek518]

It's hard to tell the difference. The question is whether PS5 is in 4080 or 4080 in PS5?

[@davefb5079]

Yeah, I agree with the last statement. The difference is the price only, that's all I can see.

[@thehighend4545]

On a 4 inch phone screen, you're probably right...

[@davefb5079]

@@thehighend4545 Uh? I'm on a gaming desktop PC, so I do know the difference and it's minimal. The human eye can only catch so many colours. For the difference in price, is it worth it for minimal differences. Each to their own I suppose.

[@thehighend4545]

@@davefb5079 I have them both, on a 161" screen innovations screen, Sony laser projector. There is a huge difference when you turn on all the bells and whistles, ray tracing etc. I do agree, you can only see so much but when you blow it up like that it PS5 simply can not keep up. To be fair, I am running a faster PC than this but the video's point is is just that. Play Madden on PC?

[@davefb5079]

@@thehighend4545 Nah, mainly FPS and Survival stuff. Bro does a lot of racing stuff, he's well into it.

[@thehighend4545]

@@davefb5079 lol well, if I ever want to be killed 30 times in a match, I'll hit you up

[@luckycharmearth]

PC with AMD > PS5 > PC with intel. At least PS5 does not crush as PC with intel does.

[@diuslucrii2171]

i have a 4070 ti Super 16 but this show us that cards are so expensive and for what , ps5 do the same and isnt so expensive like need to buy a pc gpu in this days

[@jaysoegaard]

With the exception of VR support and FPS not worth the cost to upgrade to a 4080 for this game lol

[@avoidralph]

some people like margarine... I prefer butter!!

[@stephenhood2948]

This game looks freaking amazing!!

[@freynedarlus-bm4km]

Nvidia pay through the nose fanboys must feel sick watching this. BTW that’s an excellent Split View comparison, kudos for the effort.

[@jimich81]

Разница видна, но не настолько, чтобы прям хотеть только 4080, пк с 4080 стоит очень дорого.

[@marangondoni]

Try this comparison on cyberpunk 2077

[@xangyang2501]

Ps5 still kick butt...wait til the ps5 pro launches

[@miguelangel1512]

In PS5 this game looks amazing.

[@CraigJFW]

PC is slightly sharper but hardly noticeable

[@praystation]

The anisotropic filtering on ps5 isn't as high.

[@ahobaka69]

there is not the slightest difference, especially from raindrops entering the car 😂

[@MingaDorada]

Donde esta la diferencia? Ah si , en el precio!

[@KALESSIN3]

Jajaja exacto

[@orian-x]

Im not Nvidia GeForce guy but this game dont show the limits on 4080

[@OperationFoxley19441]

Wait until the PS5 PRO comes out.

[@Sukhoi47Berkut1]

A no ser que prestes mucha atencion a los detalles, en cuanto a la calidad grafica no hay mucha diferencia,, ahora los FPS si se nota que la PS5 mantiene entre 40 y 50FPS mientras la 4080 si mantiene los 60 sin ningun tipo de bajones, lo que hay que cuestionarse es si vale la pena esos 1000$ de diferencia entre una y la otra, Siento que la unica serie 40 que no es botar tu dinero es la 4070, el resto es un desperdicio.

[@nunopenaspt]

PS5 Pro will increase the stakes even further, the price/performance ratio will be unbeatable. If the numbers are real, it will have a boost of 227% on the GPU teraflops performance.

[@uwehaferland6241]

The video of the 4080 ist sharper, probably due to missing upsampling. The PS5 has a worlds better value for money!

[@ClaudioSantini]

There is a huge difference. The quality of the lights and ray tracing is not even comparable, just look at the reflections of the buildings on the body of the car in the FPPs, on the PS5 side they are all blurry and grainy, unwatchable, at this point it would be better not to have the RTX. Even the shadows are much sharper on the Nvidia side, those on the PS5 are at the level of the 1080 if not even worse.

[@Timmeh_The_tyrant]

translation... "I LOVE NVIDIA, DONT TALK ABOUT MY BABY LIKE THAT".

[@mutigaben2038]

huge difference..

[@ClaudioSantini]

@@Timmeh_The_tyrant I can't love a brand but I love graphic quality. And the quality of PS5 you can see on 8 years old PC with GTX 1080.

[@tr1p77]

Ps5 has better road reflections and rain patterns. Very close between the 2 but ps5 takes it if ye ask me.

[@ONEHENDRIX]

I see no difference whatsoever.

[@polypolar]

9:05 you didn't clip that wall in PS5 though 🤣 and 9:55 so you drive better on a cheap console compared to the "high end pc" 💀 and still no vehicle damage those wall hits would have ended the race irl

[@flamixin]

4080 is better with my first glimpse. It’s the lack of dynamic range on ps5 makes the game look quite flat. Am I the only one here can tell?

[@bennylloyd-willner9667]

On the other hand, if the thing you experience when racing is slightly different in video quality, it must be a boring racing game😊

[@scoobarumad]

PS5 looks a lower resolution, but its definitely getting better FPS because of it. The 4080 looks like its struggling to reach even 60fps .

[@mv223]

4080 struggling to reach 60fps? HA.

[@adrianolucatelli26]

ambient occlusion its the difference

[@johnjudge6601]

Little benifit, dwindling returns here

[@supermassiveblckman]

At the level we're at, it's no longer a matter of CPU/GPU to define the quality of a game. We just need the competence (of racing, f1, cars, etc...) of those who develop the games. Give the licence for F1 games to Kunos and all this abominable crap will end