其實睇翻F1 sporting regulations 27.3寫明'Should a car leave the track the driver may re-join, however, this may only be done when it is safe to do so and without gaining any lasting advantage. At the absolute discretion of the Race Director a driver may be given the opportunity to give back the whole of any advantage he gained by leaving the track' 如果嚴格按規則字面理解,規則冇講到要「讓車交還位置」而係要「交還獲得嘅持續優勢」。因為如果唔係VER犯規cut 彎,嗰圈有機會係HAM喺前面拋開1秒等後面VER冇DRS用(雖然亦都有可能拋開唔到1秒,不過唔可以排除有哩個可能),而VER cut 彎後再讓車獲得嘅「持續優勢」正正係1、可以帶頭大半圈壓制住HAM嘅速度2、確保咗跟住嗰個圈一定有DRS用。咁佢去到T27前讓車再食翻DRS爬翻頭算唔算交還咗「持續優勢」呢?因為冇明文規定「持續優勢」嘅定義,依家犯規讓車真係同Qualifying入面嘅‘gentlemen’s agreement’ 差唔多。
@jeffkl18402 жыл бұрын
其實呢場賽事最大爭議點係fia 既判罰 1. Max 中線讓位 其實00後都講到max係有權選擇點樣讓同埋係邊到讓,而且大家只係識企係一點話max中線讓唔係真心讓,各位人兄成熟啲啦,鬥車爭世界冠軍,邊個會真心想讓車?係對自己有利位置讓係好合理既做法,咸爺當年阻rosberg拉龍都係話佢輸緊世界冠軍,唔通咩都唔做? 如果仲執著係中線無心讓所以max錯晒,各位真係為小而小 2. Brake test 咸爺 外國有youtube channel 出過事發片段去睇max係咪brake test佢,大家不妨睇睇,而賽中間罰5秒亦都唔係針對呢點,係針對唔讓位而罰,所以嚴格泥講fia 係咸爺brake test vettel 無罰,今次係賽事進行期間亦無罰max, 都合符fia 既準則 3. 咸爺唔過車 咸爺因為溝通問題唔知max打算讓車,其實果個位就算咸爺知可以過車我都覺得佢未必會係果隻彎過,後面drs路段,佢過得都預左max會開drs, 除非佢好有信心守到 Max係今場車的確好多踩界位,但同樣為爭冠既ham亦都唔小,大家會唔會可以成熟啲去睇,其實為左爭冠就一定會出現呢啲事,唔好淨小max而忽略左咸爺既往事,如果做人做到咁偏頗,咁真係都無咩說話可講 我個人只會覺得,fia唔好出手搞亂場比賽其實已經好好,判罰唔一致,有啲位又明顯放某車隊走,咁其實都間接幫左一邊。但又從營商角度去睇,幾場落泥做到max同咸爺同分入最後一場,吸收視制造話題泥講f1 今次真係大贏家,但就實在難為觀眾要睇啲咁既比賽
@TREX3202 жыл бұрын
不能更認同樓主的說法
@Lukwong1262 жыл бұрын
中肯之中嘅中肯
@alexfan67762 жыл бұрын
買重下一場Max/Hamilton 互撞相相出局😏
@yejinson80162 жыл бұрын
最後一站吧我覺得不太可能這樣做
@aidan_33852 жыл бұрын
可能係Mick保老豆記錄炒Hamilton🤪
@peiu33352 жыл бұрын
Wingman保子撞Max
@Jonathan10282 жыл бұрын
到時MaFIA 會dq max, 8界就出現
@agneskwan97312 жыл бұрын
想睇
@kinglouie692 жыл бұрын
我補充返小許,一個車手樣位.不會好似Max咁stand係賽道中間.而且左右搖擺.後車基本上唔知佢想點.一個F1車手吾識點樣車?唔好玩啦!一個業餘車手都知道.正確樣車只要正常減底車速.留出Racing line或者正常可以通過的寬度,並非站在中缐左右轉缐再brake test.Max is fault !
講到尾根本就係Mia, 既然我唔係指定時間讓個位就要俾人罰5秒,但係我慢駛後邊又唔爬頭,咁煞掣都係迫於無奈,但係又比你搵到藉口罰。ham個解釋更加九唔搭八,00後同Mia感覺上都全盤接受呢個解釋,但係我想問乜平時車手見到前面慢車爬頭要車隊通知嘅咩?我平時見啲車lose of power慢駛嗰陣又唔見後邊架車一齊慢?其實成件事就係ham自己引發左意外然後扮無辜將個責任比車隊同Mia
紅旗係因為要整護欄,一早寫左入rulebook紅旗可以換胎。如果唔想啲人慢車嘅時候換胎偷時間,就要連VSC SC都禁埋。 但唔覺得呢場特別幫紅牛,如果黑哨,應該每一次T1 Max 逼 Lewis 出街/take avoiding action 都唔罰同埋唔洗叫 Max 讓。 我反而覺得係 FIA 用個5s penalty 去整到 Max 冇得換紅胎攞多一分。
Call a spade a spade n there’s no need to please Max’s fans. 2.4 G acceleration is double the force generated when the brake of a normal car is applied to the FULL. To let someone pass “strategically” is not exactly what the stewards’ decision was to make the race a bit fairer. That’s dirty & VERY RISKY!! Just as Tiff Needell said with candour @ Lovercars on the Grid, while Max is an incredibly talented driver and he will be sooner or later a world champion, he is the dirtiest driver on the F1 grid. And off the track, he acted childishly as a spoilt brat walking off the podium refusing to celebrate, claiming there’s no real champagne!?!?! Stop unleashing a monster or he will bury himself ignorant of his recklessness, arrogance & total disregard of and disrespect for others. Love the sport and applaud sportsmanship, not dirty tactics or haughtiness whoever the champion is.