Internal space for long range air to air missiles is needed to keep the planes stealthy. In addition longer range for the airplanes is also needed in order to have a long range standoff distance for the carriers.
@davidjagan27943 ай бұрын
Great USA made fighter jet
@kurtwagner35010 күн бұрын
I know it’s stupid but I always wondered with the range component if it couldn’t be solved by a Star Wars hyperspace ring type solution. Attach a drop tank style jet booster to get you halfway, drop it and go the rest on your own power. Feels like a version of that could work
@chaoticsworst2 ай бұрын
I love the way you sneak in F-14 Tomcats every so often;-) One of my Fav.
@rgloria403 ай бұрын
Looks like it going to be up to the present Midshipmen. I think the A12 got very far into the detail design phase. They would need to understand Active Flow with DARPA x65 and completed R&D for F/A fix vortex generators (dynamic vortex generation) and to incorporate it. Nothing wrong repackage existing work...use citations.
@rjwearelindfors9043 ай бұрын
Good compuer graphics.
@aaronellington55462 ай бұрын
Our adversaries should pay attention. Don’t mess with America.😅
@Joe-b2n3 ай бұрын
Canards are not stealthily .
@NikMus-f6q3 ай бұрын
Kalau aku pakai flight mode phone internet aku dapat tak apa pakai flight mode internet nak cakap mcm mana
@ericb.43583 ай бұрын
Hmmm... the Navy moves ahead with its NGAD fighter but it appears that the Air Force has "paused" the development of their NGD fighter. However the Air Force has vastly upgraded the F-15 into the F-15 Eagle and is now upgrading many F-22 Raptors with better radar, networ comms, 360 deg. cameras and helmet visor information projection/control ability. Thus the Air Force will not ve entirely without cutting edge fighters. Hopefully the new thinner, lighter (more durable?) stealth coating can be applied to the older, high maintenance and perhaps less effective coating on the F-22. ->>> TheNavy already has a drone tanker which could be made stealthier so it can accompany fighters closer to target areas to give them more range - and be "attributable" if absolutely necessary.
@timothycunningham39833 ай бұрын
THESE ARE NOT RELIABLE DESIGNS. ARTIST RENDERING.
@anthonychristofferson15353 ай бұрын
True
@kcsvantasticvoyages972925 күн бұрын
Wow
@pacosantino10493 ай бұрын
the plane on your miniature has no shadow
@timothycunningham39833 ай бұрын
Because it’s only a graphic and not a real picture.
@pacosantino10493 ай бұрын
@@timothycunningham3983 a lie then
@richardseys80143 ай бұрын
go navy
@accobb15533 ай бұрын
How many have been produced so far? Oh, nice video.
@kevinmccarthy87463 ай бұрын
ZERO
@Cryo_Cake2 ай бұрын
none its only in the early stages of development, just like NGAD, FCAS and GCAP
@CusodtyajustNorights3 ай бұрын
Fyi Navy nor some of the folks watching these videos We have. Nothing to do with what others may or may not have going on I'm not saying I agree because I don't agree with what and if they partake in that type of life I am not alright with that life style I do agree Sir.
@russellgrice3 ай бұрын
You Guys Need To Get On The Same Page !! Most New Post Says That This Air Craft Has Been Put On Hold !! Yet Here You Have What Looks Like A Fully Operational Model !!
@AndrewSinclair-bk9ho3 ай бұрын
Pointless , unless you have spares on board carriers , unlike the F35!
@gfan0033 ай бұрын
Latest Chinese attack Drone flys 8 mach and equiped with hypersonic micro-missiles. US Government's Recent funding shown cutting cost on the New fighter program and instead putting more on modernizing the nukes.
@acebandooo3 ай бұрын
Chinese say allot of thing
@i-on-u3 ай бұрын
China is bankrupt!,…the country’s built with “ tofu-dreg” projects, it is doomed. Paper Tiger military just like its RED communist brothers, Russia and North Korea.
@bitrage.3 ай бұрын
Ngad, f/a-xx, why dont they focus on 1 double jet
@alexanderbaker27443 ай бұрын
What do you think the F-35 JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER program was? Its good in theory, but the needs are different enough to not be efficient. That being said, there should be a initiate to share components from a logistics standpoint.
@bitrage.3 ай бұрын
@@alexanderbaker2744 f-35 aka "Fat Amy" is a single jet...
@aaronellington55462 ай бұрын
The reason why we don’t focus on one particular aircraft is because we can walk and chew gum at the same time😮
@bitrage.2 ай бұрын
@@aaronellington5546 wow... absolute slammer!! I guess I forgot designing next gen fighter jets is as involved as chewing gum... BRILLIANT insight!!🤣🤦♂️
@Kauthaji3 ай бұрын
No matter who is elected: the Redskin or Trump The military might must continue.
@AndyBonesSynthPro3 ай бұрын
I hope they veer from the CG design. A duck isn't scary, only pointy things are scary
@robertmanella5283 ай бұрын
Looks like shit and we are broke!!! Cancel it now!!!
@BruceConklin-js5rg3 ай бұрын
Right now we have the F-35, a new generation fighter which is small, low performance, short range, low altitude.... And the F-22, not quite as up to date but a deterrent and a war-winner. But the latter is only available in small numbers. Obama's cancellation of the F-22 Raptor left open, deliberately, the possibility of a third World War.