FACEOFF! -- 2025 Subaru Forester vs. 2025 Mazda CX-5: Comparison

[@CarConfections]

Are you looking to buy a Mazda CX-5, Subaru Forester or any new vehicle? Go to carconfections.com/new-car-quotes to get the BEST price and access to invoice pricing information!

[@governorstash8168]

Instead of a smile meter. Can you please replace with or include 0-60 times as a have no idea what the smile means. The smile is based on your feelings which I cannot quantify. It's the only problem I have with your videos.

[@jacklong1298]

Bought the Subaru Forester yesterday!Love it!

[@jimbeasley33]

I work at Subaru and they are an AMAZING company from a customer service standpoint and backing their product. That said, I would take the Mazda personally...for the turbo and interior.

[@steve8803]

@jimbeasley33 What about compared to an outback 2.4t?

[@jimbeasley33]

@ wilderness is on the short list as well. Leaning that way currently.

[@davekeller2798]

I agree. I was a service manager of a Subaru dealership. I have worked for other Japanese auto dealerships, but I have never had a manufacture back their product like Subaru does. The only problem ( in my area here in the South ) is the lack of dealer network.

[@Charles-d4e3b]

2024 CX5 Jan. Already 26,000+ and crushing it. Love it so far

[@briengakaplan-b1550]

The reason the CX-5 hasn’t changed much since 2017 is because it’s really just THAT good. I have a 2018 GT soul red with 64k miles on it and it’s been one of the best cars I’ve ever owned. Nothing but routine maintenance, great drive mechanics, no squeaks or rattles, sure it’s the smallest of the segment but if space isn’t a major priority it’s a great choice still to this day.

[@eddiem488]

Completely agree. Our family has a 2017 GT, and it’s obviously not very comparable, but it definitely feels like enough space after upgrading from a Honda Civic. Even though it’s on the smaller side for the segment, they didn’t sacrifice passenger space and comfort, especially when something like the RAV4 actually has less space in the second row. The only major upgrade we made was adding Apple CarPlay/Android Auto because it wasn’t standard yet, and it was enough to make it feel more modern. In general, it doesn’t feel like an 8 year old vehicle and people never believe it’s more that 2-3 years old. You’re absolutely right, even though it hasn’t changed, it doesn’t feel old or dated. The Forester was actually our second choice, but other than having a bit more space, it always fell short compared to the CX-5. Similar to the RAV4, the Forester always felt very utilitarian and rugged, which did add to the practicality and toughness of the vehicle, but it also made it feel somewhat cheaper and truck-like. On the other hand, the CX-5 is not futuristic or super modern, but it balances everything really well. It’s still very reliable and practical, but it also doesn’t sacrifice Mazda’s sporty elegance and sophistication.

[@johndixon9551]

18:09 The difference in the increase in HP/TQ and no CVT in the Mazda should be worth 4 pts (2 pts for each difference). These are the most important components to consider, engine and transmission.

[@sneakyfoz3692]

You’re living in the past, the CVT is no longer rubbish like they used to be. Having driven both, the Mazda kills it on paper, in real life driving the gap is not as great. Only on a racetrack would see the Mazda pull ahead, which in this segment is a pointless exercise.

[@Chibearsfan01]

I’ve owned a 2019 CX5 Signature for nearly 6 years, and it is hands down the best car I’ve ever owned. Turbo engine, ride, and interior are absolutely unbeatable for the non-luxury segment. Like the Forester, but they have a kiddie engine by comparison.

[@kenfrankel3498]

Tku for giving me the extra confidence to keep my ‘22 Signature for another 3 years. I can confirm your opinion on what a great car this is. Driving in Sport mode with premium gas is a very satisfying experience. That said I’ll be tracking the upcoming hybrid version when it comes out later this year.

[@marvingonzalez6345]

Forester is top in this class, and also the best all wheel drive, best visivility bigger space nicest ride and longer lasting.

[@SusanHesse-u5c]

Just bought our second Forester today. Loved my 2015 Forester and all 138,000 miles I put on it! I appreciate Subaru’s philosophy and feel that they build a quality, reliable product. Wish they hadn’t changed so many things, but I know the changes are for the best. We had no issues at all with the 2015. I know the Mazda CX5 is also a great car. Those two have been my top two picks for over 10 years. Great review. Thank you!

[@ryanfrisby7389]

I’d definitely take the Forester, excellent comparison!😸

[@TheFriendlyCorgi]

Engineers here: CVTs are an awful transmission design due to slippage and power loss... You may have a "smoother shift". But CVTs are less durable and are less friendly when providing power on a turn or acceleration from stop

[@marvingonzalez6345]

I am close to reach 340,000 miles on my subaru cvt.

[@sneakyfoz3692]

@@TheFriendlyCorgi so are all CVTs the same, just like all regular transmission are the same right? Do you not think CVT have improved at all in the last 20 years or so? Pretty strange for a so called ‘Engineer’ to make blanket statements on CVT transmissions like they are all the same. I’ve owned a car with a CVT transmissions in 2008, the worse of CVTs it was rubbish to drive but lasted 15 years, the CVT on 2024 Forester is worlds apart, really drives no different to a regular automatic transmission if not actually better for everyday commuting. Current generation CVTs will last the life of a vehicle.

[@chrisb9478]

Both of these are great vehicles. I’ve grown to like the smoothness & efficiency of the Subaru CVT. The Forester is roomier & way easier to see out of. I like the Mazda Cx-50 better than the Cx-5.

[@KEVINBROWN-x6n]

I would go with the Forester. The space inside this car is unbelievable. It may not have as much horsepower but believe me it will cruise 80 to 85 like it's nobody's business. My mom and dad had a 2018 Subaru Forester touring edition. It is a good smaller car and visibility is supreme. Subaru also has better crash test ratings!

[@solderbuff]

Mazda's crash ratings are also outstanding. The reason I like both of these brands.

[@ranran2218]

My wife has a 2021 forester sport, it is amazing in long trips. We have a 85lb golden retriever that can fit comfortably in the back. The lighting is also phenomenal with the steering responsive headlights.

[@Stevehab2]

At the end of the day, they both are wonderful in certain situations. AWD system, Subi. Sport performance, Mazda. Space and roomy comfort, Subi. We could do this all day. Most of us need to chose one, so whatever compromise suits you is all good. Personally, it’s a mode of transport,both are fantastic and will last many years if maintained. I’m steering clear of turbos. I’ll pay a little more for gas and nothing expensive. Hybrid is a no for me. High cost, higher insurance, expensive repairs. Sure, in a perfect world, anything is ok. Good luck with that perfect world.

[@ranran2218]

In terms of value, reliability, overall usefulness, and comfort, the forester is hands down better. Also, the awd system in the forester is better. You can get better discounts from dealers in subaru also. For a fair comparison, the non turbo cx5 should have been compared.

[@davidmoreno3370]

To me the Subaru looks like a station wagon. The looks aren’t it

[@fsiragusa]

I’ve owned a Forester and test drove the Mazda. The Forester was a Much smoother ride. Idc if the Mazda’s acceleration was faster, but that’s me. I agree with most of the points they made…but the pop up screen on the dashboard was annoying to drive with. I also think the Forester seats were more comfortable.

[@AlexUkrop]

I bought CX 5 as I do not like CVT at all in Subaru. Driving on CX, it is a lot of pleasure in comparison with others.

[@stuartbendall2134]

First review i have seen that show and compare the sound systems. Thanks

[@matty_o]

I'm a CX5 owner but fond of Subarus for better handling over bumps. A lockable glove box Rubberized foot rest Larger cargo room. If this was the non turbo CX5. It doesn't do a better 0-60 even though it has more power and 6 speed auto. But as a Mazda owner I like the driving engagement and the looks and they are not as common as RAV4,Crv or Forester Would I buy a Forester? Yes but this is my 2nd CX5 and used,the Mazda is cheaper Also my fear of droning CVT Had a 2015 civic and didn't have any issues with it being CVT

[@FunAtDisney]

I use to listen to a very respected radio host in the LA area called The Motor Man a couple years ago. He noir only had this radio show was years, but owned a mechanics shop. While he said now days most cars are very well built, Subaru (and Mercedes) were on another level. I guess if you want sport and driving dynamics, yes the Mazda is better. But for a family, all-wheel drive, cargo room, utility, re-sale and reliability the Forester is the choice by far.

[@eddiem488]

When our family was looking for a new vehicle we wanted something reliable, but also something a little less common than a RAV4 or CR-V. It came down to the Forester and CX-5, and both had strong selling points. The Forester has more space and storage, and a pretty bulletproof AWD system for our Canadian winters; the CX-5 has more standard safety features, incredible handling, and much more refined interior and exterior styling. In the end, we found that coming from a Honda Civic, we were already getting more space, and the CX-5 is nearly as comfortable in the second row as it is up front, which is rare for a crossover. Even though we didn’t want something really futuristic, the Forester, while functional, still seems to have a more dated and generic interior, similar to the RAV4. The CX-5 is not perfect, but it has a much better balance of sporty elegance and sophistication, without sacrificing reliability and practicality. Since 2017, Mazda has offered a HUD in the CX-5, which wasn’t available on most crossovers, and is still not available on the 2025 Forester. Keeping things simple has really benefited Subaru, but Mazda’s premium/luxury features have set it apart and brought some much needed enjoyment and refinement to a relatively uninspiring vehicle category.

[@skimanfree1073]

What's HUD?

[@eddiem488]

@ It stands for Head-Up Display or it’s sometimes called an active driving display. It’s located above the gauge cluster and is often imbedded right into the dashboard. It projects information either directly onto the windshield or on a clear plastic panel. It’s meant to help keep a driver’s eyes on the road and avoid have to constantly check your gauge cluster for basic info. Most HUDs also work with the navigation system to project GPS directions and street names.

[@skimanfree1073]

@@eddiem488 OK, Thanks. I have that on my Hyundai

[@eddiem488]

@ Nice! Yeah a lot like Mazda, Hyundai has them on most of their vehicles in higher trims. Sadly, Subaru doesn’t offer a HUD on the Forester. Being low-tech is not a bad thing by any means, because at least it has allowed Subaru to focus on their reliability. Mazda on the other hand doesn’t have nearly as many features as Hyundai, but they do a great job of balancing simple and practical tech with innovative and reliable engineering.

[@M.Redsky]

CX-5 All day everyday.

[@MrBigsmallguy]

Battle of the mids. That being said I have been wondering which one I want so this is well timed! 😂. Thanks!

[@solderbuff]

Same here. I'm a Mazda fanboy, but after seeing the new Forester in person I'm blown away, tbh. After having a second child, I think, my next car is going to be a Subaru.

[@SusanHesse-u5c]

I don’t think you can go wrong with either. Both are great cars. My extended family owns Mazdas or Subarus. All are happy with their choice!

[@kencoleman8929]

Travel light, look good, make mine a CX5!

[@mikecradeur2367]

I have A 2025 CX5. Love it. Very fun to drive. Lots of power with the turbo. I don't sit in the back seat. Definitely Mazda.

[@daucoin6493]

I’ve owned two Foresters since I previously drove BMWs, and I’m sold on Subaru.

[@rogersims5085]

$630 for 76 more horsepower. I'd take the Mazda any day.

[@chrispnw2547]

The 2027 Forester will probably get a refresh and adopt the new audio entertainment system from the updated Outback and have the Hybrid widely available as an option. If only Subaru could develop an 8 speed auto, the Subarus would be perfect.

[@solderbuff]

Nah, their CVT is great for fuel economy.

[@lorimcquinn3966]

Owning (3) different Subarus, I would definitely deduct a full point from the the Forester's score due to the CVT. Your acceleration test raises the words Drone Queen to a new level. The CVT is a cost cutting transmission and has no place on a $40K vehicle.

[@justinmusgrove2548]

And yet you've owned three?

[@lorimcquinn3966]

@@justinmusgrove2548 That's what I stated, What's your point?

[@TheDavidDiaz]

The fact this comparison is made up of a brand new vehicle and a vehicle that debuted 8 years ago, speaks volumes.

[@solderbuff]

I wouldn't call the 2025 Forester "brand new". It uses the same engine as before.

[@kurtgrundel4045]

Had a Forester so my old tall father in law could get in and out. Lousy gas mileage, bad infotainment unit , eyesight slamming on breaks in shade of trees, interior plastic panels cracked and flat uncomfortable seats. He died and the following week I got a CX5. Flawless. Even gets three miles per gallon over the Subaru and it is a turbo.

[@floridaoutdooradventures8981]

I like the fact that Mazda has a real transmission, whereas Forester uses CVT. The acceleration of Forester is ABSOLUTELY HORRIBLE!! Forester is clearly under-powered! Considering you are going to spend 99 percent of your time driving and not camping, Mazda CX5 is the BEST CHOICE! It's an EXTREMELY FUN CAR TO DRIVE, VERY STYLISH, WITH PLENTY OF CHARISMA AND THE BEST LOOKING INTERIOR! If you wanna LOOK GOOD, WANT AN SUV THAT DRIVES AND FEELS LIKE A SPORTS CAR, THEN GET A CX5! You don't need to compromise if you get the CX5! You may also want to consider the CX-50 which is the bigger version of CX-5 and yes, CX-50 comes with a hybrid version as well for better gas mileage. But, I would rather go with the Turbo version which is SO MUCH FUN TO DRIVE!!!! -:) If you wanna look like any other a run-of-the-mill, boring Joe /Gale off the street, then go and settle with Forester.

[@Striker50_]

The 6 speed is mediocre. A CVT makes more sense for 99% of owners. The turbo should have an 8, or 10 speed auto.

[@RandyFredericks-i7e]

can’t beat subrau in the snow

[@matty_o]

Well unfortunately the non turbo CX5 c which still has more power than the Subaru is slower at 0-60

[@matty_o]

I have a CX5 though but it has shortcoming

[@liljoe23la]

CX5 has poor visibility

[@MoCarey]

I choose the Mazda CX-5 because it uses a traditional automatic transmission, it has a spirited driving experience and a premium interior.

[@drj6418]

Great comparison as always. Please compare the Mercedes GLA with the BMW X1 if you can. Thank you!

[@marcrold4294]

We already own a Forester and would most assuredly buy another one over the Mazda.

[@FredRoxstar]

If the Forester had turbo it would be an easy choice for me but I'd say they're both excellent

[@joloriquelme]

Smile meter CX-5: 🙂 Smile meter Forester: 🙁 Source: this own comparison. No futher questions, your honor.

[@pauladams3156]

I just bought a CX5 S Preferred but I found out that they have 8 different trim/accessory models. That’s clearly about $ you have to pay.

[@jenn1fermeyer468]

I often see auto journalist criticize the Subaru ,and show disdain, as a rep I loved my forester ,was my cheapest maintenance car , drove 380 000 km in heels in the city ,still had original clutch in mint condition. My mazda mx5 was lovely car loved it but expensive to service in comparison, much lower resale value, very different cars,but same companies. Loyal to Subaru, real car with proper windows multifunctional, and Mazda can not compare with Subaru on service and support. Subaru keeps value and has immense brand loyalty .

[@lss-jprep4980]

We have 3 CX-5’s in family. 1-4 cylinder 2019 and 2 turbocharged (2024). Love all 3. Tranny works great, seats are comfortable strong a/c. No issues. The seats on the non-a/c seats have thicker bolsters. The turbos are a blast to drive and provide ample passing power. Would never buy a cvt. As usual the Subaru is underpowered and I’ve heard nothing but horror stories on the interface.

[@justicecenter]

Does the new Subaru still have the “Steering Responsive Headlights “ and did this model have memory seats.

[@meriawakened]

Yes it does.

[@DominionAnako-bb7ry]

Beautiful cars ❤❤❤❤❤❤

[@84imreplica]

I really like the CX5, but I'd wait for the hybrid version coming out in (hopefully) 2026/

[@SpringfieldTony]

what? a totally brand new butt kicking comparison vid? YES ! ! ! heck the CX-5 is zippier than the baby bimmer. yeah but the Mazda is faster & looks cooler > but if Subaru wants to give me a brand new Forester Touring fully loaded with 5 years free oil changes & complete maintenance . . . I'll take it.

[@christianbryant5617]

Interesting to compare just to have it, but Mazda is *obviously in a different position, catering to premium clients. For this reason, I’d rather have the CX5, as I prefer nicer cars over your standard, mainstream ones.

[@OceanWave-k4g]

You must be crazy comparing subaru with cx5. Cx5 is the most reliable suv in the market it's so reliable that no car in the streets is reliable as cx5 .

[@BearMetL]

pretty sure subaru just took over the no.1 spot for reliability over toyota.

[@alfredktn]

The Forester exterior looks like a typical Toyota Fortuner. Looks like Toyota’s investment in Subaru is taking shape.

[@K_patts8370]

Is the hip room in the Forrester good?? I have a 20 CX-5 and it’s blah on hip room 😢

[@Michael-h6g]

We bought a mid-grade model 2024 CX-5 (wife's vehicle) last October and we continue to be impressed. I currently drive a CRV and I am looking to replace it. I respect Subaru's offroad capability but I won't need that and I've never been a fan of the Boxer engine. So between these two vehicles, I'd go Mazda (again).

[@davidcleveland5]

Comparing Mazda with Subaru... really? Subaru is the best of all wheels drive.

[@RustyRhodes-ox1xo]

Mazda hands down Rocks ! Forester is unattractive, underpowered and has a CVT transmission.

[@borisnjers]

Mazda, all day long.

[@travelport7868]

CX5 reminds me of 2020-2022 BMW X1. I owned 4 Foresters, and despite a few annoying things they were great cars. But moved to another brand because I didn’t like the CVT and “nanny car” safety features that had to be turned off every time you start the car.

[@kenweller2032]

I have a 2020 Forester Sport and I installed a $20 dongle that defaults the annoying engine shutoff at stops to "off". Since the '25 controls this via touchscreen, I don't know if there's a workaround. Also, if I switch the lane departure warning off, it stays off. Other than that, I can't think of any other particularly nagging "nanny car" features.

[@scotthayesproductions5715]

The CX5 engine and transmission crush the Subaru's crappy engine and CVT. I'll take the firmer ride of the mazda over anything else in the segment, mainly due to the Turbo and 6spd. My 2019 Signature has been exceptional. Nothing but routine care, and very easy DIY maintenance.

[@meriawakened]

Subaru all the way 👍

[@alicebrunette3057]

I compared the cx5, forester, and Lexus ux. Lexus did not have REAL leather. Also had a cvt hybrid. Very noisy and low to the ground. The forester had zero personality. Bought the cx5 turbo premium. Just as nice as my old Audi Q3. And more reliable.

[@horaciocapella8562]

The Mazda doesn't have a CVT. IT has a regular great old fashion automatic transmission.

[@PineappleGamesTV]

The one without a CVT.

[@Striker50_]

@@PineappleGamesTV What are the benefits of a 6 speed auto?

[@JohnSmith-te2yg]

It's not a CVT. ​@@Striker50_

[@kenweller2032]

@@Striker50_ General reliability and many are just used to the shifts. Well made and well matched CVTs have become quite reliable, though and offer smoothness and fuel economy.

[@Striker50_]

@@kenweller2032 The automatic transmission in both my Cadillac and Honda have given out My Accord CVT now is going 160K miles strong and has a smooth power band. Reality is that auto transmissions are starting to become like manuals when autos came out

[@Charlee-w1u]

@@Striker50_ less maintenance

[@henryrestrepo8214]

Mazda CX-5 🤩🤩🤩

[@keathy1960]

Own a CX5 Diseil Akeria top of the range, The best and most reliable car ever own and fuel efficient. Go Mazda any day😅

[@76jjax]

Mazda cx-50 meridian edition?

[@angesquer]

You should’ve given that transmission point to the cx-5. Having a cvt is big no 😬

[@skalawitz]

Mazda, I go with CX5. Subaru, I go with Crosstrek.

[@kvcooks814]

My dream next car= 2026 Mazda CX-5 Hybrid, Signature trim, Artisan Red over tan leather...sigh. Every day that I drive my new CR-V, I miss my old CX-5 more. I really do hope that the next generation is all I hope for and then it's goodbye CR-V.

[@solderbuff]

How does CX-5 beat a CR-V?

[@kvcooks814]

@@solderbuff Just my opinion. I loved the CX-5's sleeker body, nicer interior, sportier handling, better headlights- I can only guess that a '26 hybrid model would be similar. The CR-V is good looking and has a pretty decent interior, as a hybrid it gets great mileage, it's just a bit...boring and not quite as fun to drive.

[@mraetnts]

Thanks for highlighting brands other than the usual suspects.

[@ninahelme1521]

Foresters all the way!

[@Peizxcv]

Normal people would just get Tucson or Sportage hybrid

[@henryfabianvideo]

Mazda for me

[@Reeses0810]

My 2025 premium forester was 28000 way under 40 after Subaru dealer added roof tent lift kit custom rims big off road tires factory class 2 receiver and awnings gorgeous car. I own 3 Subaru and can tell you when it comes time to sell the real payoff is apparent very desirable cars Mazda not so much and I am a big Mazda fan Miata owner just not a great resale rig.

[@MaryPoppins-d1k]

If you live New England , buy the Subaru .

[@MaryPoppins-d1k]

The only reason some people don’t buy the Subaru is because of the gay stigma attached to it, that is too bad for them because it’s a wonderful vehicle.

[@kurtr1870]

Transmissions are even!?!? Are you kidding??? The CVT is awful on acceleration.

[@comeconcon569]

The two Japanese come face to face.

[@oligarchy-usa]

Subaru has always failed in the styling department IMO, & I personally won't buy anything with a belt/chain design CVT in it, regardless of automaker (though some are better than others). Give me a manual, a modernized regular geared-automatic like what Mazda uses in their SkyActiv 6-AT, or a proper no-plug hybrid with an "eCVT" (the only good/reliable type of 'CVT' design IMO).

[@kenweller2032]

It's too bad Subaru dropped manuals, but most everyone is. If I could get a second car after my Forrester, a Mazda 3 with a stick sounds like a blast.

[@Splendid_Lad]

I thought the Subaru would look better in person… it did not.

[@friedrichpsp]

That Subaru is the mom Jeans of SUV’s. 😂 No comparison to the CX5

[@Shafaymustafa12]

Bro I was waiting for your rankings video 😢

[@CarConfections]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/fXTMqGyIaN96rtksi=07Vr0GdU5DzXfOg-

[@Shafaymustafa12]

@CarConfections I was talking about full size SUVs😅

[@skimanfree1073]

Tack on sales tax, doc fee, window etching, lug nuts, etc you are now in the high 40s. So instead, lets complain about the price of eggs.😊

[@randyreynolds1045]

Subaru is better❤

[@felipepalacios7770]

I’d definitely go with the Subaru Forester, especially for its impressive off-road capability. It’s a more rugged and reliable choice for anyone looking to tackle rough terrain, something the Mazda CX-5 just can't match. For me, the Forester is the ideal option if I’m after versatility and performance on tough trails.

[@RJLETZPLAY]

CVT… infotainment…

[@felipepalacios7770]

@RJLETZPLAY I get your point about the CVT and infotainment. While the CVT may not be for everyone, it offers a good balance of fuel efficiency and smooth driving, especially off-road. As for the infotainment, it may not be the most advanced, but for me, the Forester shines in areas like durability and off-road capability, which is what matters most

[@RJLETZPLAY]

@ yeah I guess. forgot about fuel efficiency

[@crafty24]

This is not a fair comparison with the Mazda having the turbo.

[@CarConfections]

That's the engine you get when you spend the same amount of money 🤷‍♂️

[@crafty24]

At a MSRP comparison level you guys are right. We'll see what happens to price when Mazda releases their All new 2026 model. I love both cars. Competition is tight! ​@@CarConfections

[@RuggedHawaiian]

The Forrester front end reminds me of Robocop. Not a compliment.

[@TahranGrant]

I do not like subaru so I'm going for mazda

[@TheDominic1612]

Subaru has changed a lot, it's not as rough as before.

[@tommymas1088]

Bad comparison. The CX-5 should have the non turbo as a comparison. The Mazda turbo is also 5-6k more because of it. Also, you can't take the Mazda off road or on trails whereas you can in the Forester. 🤷‍♂️🤦‍♂️🙄🫣

[@CarConfections]

We literally showed at the beginning that they are the same price... Did you even watch the video? 🤦‍♂️

[@tommymas1]

​​@CarConfections Yes, I watched your boring and crappy video. Your pricing is off. The Mazda is much more expensive than that. 🤦‍♂️🤷‍♂️🙄

[@Vitaliy-zx1nz]

CX5 the best real automatic gear box! Subaru is bullshet with CVT.

[@richarddecicco3288]

I hate systems (Mazda) that appear to be STUCK on the dash, very pedestrian and cheap looking. Only interested in integrated (Subaru) systems for me.

[@helios_gt]

Just for records... If i will be offroading or putting the ride sometimes on beach definitely take the forester... it's sad the subaru doesnt have the 2.4T on it, that would be a game changer between this 2 mama's supermarket suv-s jajaja....

[@MMorin-qy8jr]

I like the Forester but the noise of the CVT and look slow. I have a CX-50 that I don’t like. I will have to choose between those two. My choice ……

[@CarsandTechInfo]

Without even watching the CX-5 Signature is leagues ahead & better than the Subaru Forester which is basic & boring af at this point

[@MartinStockel]

I believe the 2025 Forester is available with a turbo engine in the Wilderness trim.

[@arielhanson3912]

Mazda anyday all day

[@kevinblock2307]

I’d prefer the Mazda

[@ChrisC-fp9qu]

I would choose the forester because of the offroad capability.

[@kingkiril]

Between these two Subaru Forester for sure without doubt. I hate Mazda brand.

[@yang_goon_ca]

CVT 👎👎👎

[@Striker50_]

@@yang_goon_ca What are the benefits of an automatic transmission?

[@jordanimatedstreaming]

I also prefer torque converter automatic transmissions to CVT's, and there was nothing wrong with Subaru's pre-existing traditional automatic transmission before they switched to CVT's. Having said that, it seems Subaru make some of the most reliable CVT's in the auto industry. CVT's in Subaru's aren't the red flag they are in some other brands. For example, in American cars if you are buying a car with a CVT it means you are likely buying among the most cheaply made cars that the brand sells.

[@tristonhoang3881]

Subaru design is ugly AF

[@solderbuff]

True, but what really matters is beauty inside. Seriously, Subaru's interior is more fun, IMHO.

[@Bigdoggy12]

Hahah Subaru more reliable that’s a stretch

[@darndarndarn]

Engine of the forester is shit, bring back XT

[@cemilcam]

Zoom zoom