Faculty Roundtable: Insights into the Wolli Wonbon, Rev. Moon's Original Principle Text

[@tinageminousa8767]

Thank you Dr. Andrew Wilson.

[@anne-mariemylar1704]

Thank you Dr. Wilson, I so want to read True Father's first and only book before I go to the spiritual world. I hope that will be so. I am grateful for your diligence and perseverance in this work. Anne-Marie Mylar

[@bclarke03]

Thank you Dr Wilson, for your devotion and humility before such a large task. It seems to me that Father fulfilled his fundamental mission of finding the Only Begotten Daughter, the Bride, then surely he trusts her as his object partner in ways that we cannot fathom. I hope this book can be published in a timely fashion. Thank you again very very much.

[@cosmicsense1262]

It is fine to emphasize the feminine aspect of God but when in order to do this, one develops a theology that contradicts the Divine Principle, that is extremely problematic and is contributing to the conflicts within the Unification movement. The movement is based on the revelations and teachings of the Messiah, Sun Myung Moon. He emphasized that his chosen texts, the "Eight Great Textbooks" are the central teachings for humanity and should not be altered in any way. The Only Begotten Daughter theology claims that Restoration history since Jesus was in order to give birth to the Only Begotten Daughter, whereas Divine Principle teaches very clearly that it was for the birth of the Lord of the Second Advent, who then chooses a bride from among the women of the world (at best it would have been the future Queen Elizabeth II). It is foolish to diverge from the original Divine Principle teaching. Yet the truth shall prevail. I look forward to the publication of Wolli Wonbon and hope that the translation is as true and honest as possible. By the way: (1) Rev. Moon certainly would have made sure that Wolli Wonbon is published if he really wanted it to be a central text. (2) If Hak Ja Han wishes to publish a new book about Divine Principle, she is free to do so, but to claim that it replaces any text that Rev. Moon selected as the central texts is wrong and will further divide the movement.