A better version of the Fairey Firefly at the Canadian Warplane Heritage Museum in Hamilton taxiing and then folding its wings.
Пікірлер: 199
@EnterpriseXI12 жыл бұрын
the folding wings on these carrier birds are just a beautiful piece of engineering
@JT-cf7dq7 жыл бұрын
I was thinking the same thing. They must have built a couple of models?
@m0ther_bra1ned126 жыл бұрын
I'm amazed their able to do it at all and still have them be strong enough to fly in combat.
@nosaltadded25306 жыл бұрын
No one can say it better than that.
@scootergeorge95763 жыл бұрын
On the Grumman S2F. we could fold and unfold the wings with the engines a idle.
@CAphotos3 жыл бұрын
Not as strange as the Fairey Gannet...
@CAphotos3 жыл бұрын
"Fairey Firefly..." As a friend once said: "Now there's a name to instill fear in the hearts of the enemy."
@StudeSteve623 жыл бұрын
The CWH Firefly has not flown in some years now, but is nearing the end of some needed major work and should be active again next year...
@Jabber-ig3iw3 жыл бұрын
Another Fairey aircraft, the Gannet, has a wing folding mechanism that is a work of art.
@ExploringUndercover3 жыл бұрын
A section containing the flaps, of the Fairey Barracuda, folded as well as tinge main wing itself, so it could fit nicely. These carrier warbirds are like origami, they truly are works or art.
@soultraveller5027 Жыл бұрын
A brilliant price of engineering the fairy Gannet indeed a work of art and now we have nothing to show in British aircraft company's all gone what went wrong
@Sailfire13 жыл бұрын
I thought it was going to take off! Instead, it folded its wings up over itself, gave itself a hug and went beddy byes.
@gillesbignolas84316 жыл бұрын
A few years ago and waiting for my delayed flight (in the heart of of a snowstorm) in Hamilton, I enjoyed a private visit of this fantastic museum. Our Canadian friends are doing a great job here, no question. And always eager to accomodate their foreign visitors... Thank you again!
@iskandartaib5 жыл бұрын
There is one at the Royal Thai Air Force museum in Bangkok. They also have a Spitfire FR XIV with the bubble canopy. And you are allowed to touch them. 😁
@rexhowells70155 жыл бұрын
That will be great, looking forward to it. I grew up in Nowra Australia, and use to see these as a boy flying from the Navy base HMAS albatross
@baselhammond33174 жыл бұрын
Never heard a griffon idle as nicely as that
@scootergeorge95763 жыл бұрын
In my opinion the Wright R-1820 sounds better at idle. Like a Harley; potato, potato, potato...
@baselhammond33173 жыл бұрын
@@scootergeorge9576 these days I find it hard to choose between V12s and radials. I like the V12 at idle and radials at full power. Hard to pick really.
@scootergeorge95763 жыл бұрын
@@baselhammond3317 - At Idle, the 9 cylinder 1820 sounded great. Powered up, the 18 cylinder R-2800 was better. A high speed pass with a P-51D or other Merlin is the best.
@leefithian37043 жыл бұрын
Good fuel
@K-Effect3 жыл бұрын
What an interesting aircraft, I can't believe I've never seen one!
@Carlitosway2115 жыл бұрын
I thought it was a bad ass RC at first. Lol
@bbutc4 жыл бұрын
Same here. I think it's to do with the height that the plane has been filmed from and the initial poor film framing i.e. if you scaled the scenario down about 5 times then it looks like it's being filmed from head height by an amateur at a R/C plane show event. Had me fooled until the flames shot out of the exhaust pipe. lol.
@veng3r6633 жыл бұрын
Heh. Transformers ! More than meets the eyes..!! :D
@Skiddins Жыл бұрын
'So how do you fold the wings?' 'You pull the pin out' 'err, okayyyy'
@pistonar5 жыл бұрын
Ok, we need this for naval service, so when the wings fold, it mustn't be wider than the propeller. Fairey designer: Hold my Guinness.
@JohnyG292 жыл бұрын
Why Guinness?
@pistonar2 жыл бұрын
@@JohnyG29 Maybe PBR wasn't available.
@bonesshed.3 жыл бұрын
Hhhhm. If I'm not mistaken, there is a tappet on 5 cylinder needs adjusting by a couple of thou. Seriously though, that is B E A utiful engineering and sounds awesome on tickover and at chat.
@frederickgates43493 жыл бұрын
Ouch almost forgotten about this beautiful lady
@MrRunner5 жыл бұрын
This always makes me sad. I was in the last batch of Fairey Apprentices in the Hydraulics Div (1967). Great experience working on Concorde, Tornado, Jaguar and the Harrier to name but a few. I offered to work for the CWHM, but was told they were `full up'. Ah well.
@sabot031965 жыл бұрын
Well, their membership isn’t getting any younger. There might be openings now. They’re just finishing the Fairey refit.
@MrRunner5 жыл бұрын
@@sabot03196 Neither am I, 70 next year. I have all the tools, equipment plus the mechanical and electrical skills to refit a plane. In addition I have 5 years on the Merlin Engine. Hate to sound elitist, but this is their loss.
@sabot031965 жыл бұрын
I hear you. It’s sad to see expertise lost. Time is a thief. My grandfather was with 626 at Wickenby on Lancaster Is and IIIs. He started as a boy entrant on the R101 and ended up on Wapiti’s in Iraq pre war. He didn’t start talking about his time in service until he was close to the end.
@MrRunner5 жыл бұрын
@@sabot03196 My Uncle did 32 ops as a navigator in Lancs as a volunteer from Eire. According to my Dad, he was never the same afterwards. Wouldn't drive at night, or discuss his service. No children. I would have done it for his memory.
@SvenTviking5 жыл бұрын
The governments of the 50’s 60’s & 70’s of whatever party, made the greatest efforts to destroy the British aviation industry and create one bloated incompetent company, BAE and only build aircraft with foreign partners. Result? Only now are they admitting that most of these planes are compromises, in reality not well suited to Britain’s needs. That’s why the audit commission told the government that we must build our own fighter, the Tempest.
@paullanham10147 жыл бұрын
I love the pop bang and shear horsepower of that big rolls up front!
@alancox14445 жыл бұрын
Sure, but for the grinding brutality of small deck Atlantic carrier work the old Swordfish was a hard act to follow and nothing else quite came up to scratch in WW2. It got you off, got you back and got you down relatively safely. Practiacally VTOAL. It was also extremely tough and serviceable. More pilots died in training than in combat and your own plane was far more likely to kill you than the enemy.
@Colinpark3 жыл бұрын
Plus the first plane to carry radar...
@papalegba67593 жыл бұрын
yup my dad flew swordfish off an escort carrier in atlantic convoys. wouldn't hear a bad word about em. and you're right about the dangers, pilots got as much rum as they wanted but still loads of em lost their nerve & refused to fly. btw the grumman martlet had a similar reputation in the FAA for reliability & ease of flying, much loved aircraft.
@fatdad64able2 жыл бұрын
Fulmar and Firefly. A navy fighter concept I never quite understood.
@kerrynye37523 жыл бұрын
I don't believe it likely the Firefly was promoted as a fighter aircraft. With radar and search light on wings, I'm guessing her meat was ASW. But, if one is engaged, one must "run what you brung!"
@Mishn03 жыл бұрын
The designation is FR Mk5, for "Fighter Reconnaissance". The Brits favored (favoured?) two seat carrier fighters for quite a while. See also the Fairey Fulmar. The US often used the Dauntless as a fighter when there weren't enough Wildcats around. In one fight, a Dauntless gunner almost killed Saburo Sakai while the SBDs were providing top cover for the carriers off Guadalcanal.
@envitech023 жыл бұрын
At first I thought it was an ultrarealistic RC model, till the pilot moved.
@envitech024 жыл бұрын
Amazing wing fold mechanism!! I think only the Grumman F6F Hellcat has a similar mechanism.
@StudeSteve623 жыл бұрын
Several Grumman types used what the company called "Sto-Wing" folding. It's actually a little different from the Firefly arrangement in that the wing pivots back downward, not upward. On a Hellcat with the wings folded you see the top surface facing downward, whereas on the Firefly you see the bottom, facing upward...
@Mishn03 жыл бұрын
Quite a bit different. Grumman's folded at the main spar a little forward of the mid span of the wing and not way back at the trailing edge. That's why the Firefly needs the ground crew to operate that giant wing fold lock manually because that is at the main spar. The Avenger's wing fold could also operate at engine idle, it seems from this video, the Firefly needs quite a bit more power to run the hydraulics used.
@kerrynye37523 жыл бұрын
Interesting that it took groundcrew to unlock the folding mechanism!
@jimmcguinness69773 жыл бұрын
beautiful aircraft my father flew of the aircraft carrier hms glory 1950 ish
@Gixer750pilot3 жыл бұрын
And just think that was designed using paper, a pencil, protractor, rule and a slide rule.
@elijahreid61253 жыл бұрын
Everyone now: fairey firefly? That's not frightening at all! *The bismark crew having panic attacks after hearing fairey swordfish*
@donaldparlettjr32956 жыл бұрын
I like how the wings fold back so the pilot has a clear view to taxi in aided if need be.
@pictsidhe64714 жыл бұрын
The wing fold is purely for storage aboard aircraft carriers. There are batsmen on every carrier to guide pilots during landing and taxi.
@warrenstemphly57563 жыл бұрын
Ok, got it! You unlock the wing and then use the prop to blow them back into the folded position!
@bestamerica6 жыл бұрын
' wow that coooool plane with both folding wings... more easily room space on the aircraft carrier and inside plane room
@waynebrinker80956 жыл бұрын
It's very fast in a dive with the wings folded.
@Name-ps9fx6 жыл бұрын
Wayne Brinker Yup, just like a falcon!
@steveng.willis6186 жыл бұрын
Lol! I bet it is.
@scootergeorge95766 жыл бұрын
Recovery, however, is a bit problematic. Many years ago, Naval Air News ran a story about a Marine fighter pilot that manages to take off in his F-8 Crusader with the wings folded. Realizing his mistake, he declared an emergency, and carefully circled and put his plane back on the runway. It was at that point, he realized he had just made a second mistake. He had retracted his landing gear and forgot to extend it before touching down.
@scootergeorge95766 жыл бұрын
I was thinking infantry....
@bearbon26 жыл бұрын
When you start out having a bad day it only gets worse.
@zujiahuang84544 жыл бұрын
Interesting how he needs to rev up the engine to fold the wings
@Draliseth4 жыл бұрын
On a gas powered forklift you often have to do the same to operate or manipulate the forks. The engine probably powers the hydraulics(?) for the wing mechanism.
@zujiahuang84544 жыл бұрын
@@Draliseth Yes, most likely!
@pascalchauvet42306 жыл бұрын
The concept of a two-seat fighter was something of a British navy dogma which did not generate successful fighter aircraft. Even the Firefly would have been outclassed by any single-seat fighter aircraft. Beautiful piece of machinery all the same.
@stevenabbott36026 жыл бұрын
I'd have said anything with Fairey in front of it would have outclassed it against any other fighter.
@JohnSmith-pd1fz6 жыл бұрын
Oh no! Wilbursoaringbigmouthfinnegantractor would beg to differ! DUHHH!!! He knows everything about aviation.
@narabdela4 жыл бұрын
@@JohnSmith-pd1fz Since when did pussies know anything about anything?
@Colinpark3 жыл бұрын
@@stevenabbott3602 Actually the Fulmar had a decent number of kills to it's credit. Remember that with no radar and no GPS, fly a few hundred mile over open ocean was a good way to get lost and die. Most of the early losses to the Japanese was when japan was fielding highly trained pilots against pilots with limited training, when that equation changed so did the loss ratios.
@steveabbott32803 жыл бұрын
@@Colinpark Still willing to bet, that any pilot in a Fulmar would have rather been in a Hurricane or any other line fighter going up against a Zero.
@okrajoe6 жыл бұрын
Great to see those wings folding.
@hughfraser15473 жыл бұрын
Did not realise that they had to rev the engine that high for the pumps to fold the wings.
@brentfellers96323 жыл бұрын
Love it! 🇨🇦🍁🇨🇦
@gitfoad80323 жыл бұрын
Nice to see the Leigh light.
@delten-eleven19104 жыл бұрын
And I thought the TBM Avenger had the coolest wing fold.
@TheArgieH4 жыл бұрын
Take a look at the Gannet wing fold.
@delten-eleven19104 жыл бұрын
@@TheArgieH Gannet is one of my favorite post war British planes, so unique!
@TheArgieH4 жыл бұрын
@@delten-eleven1910 Agreed. There is a Gannet T5 parked outside the Berkshire Museum of Aviation. The wings are folded and at first impression it looks like it could fly by flapping them. What amuses me is the large mirror mounted at 45 degrees above the second cockpit so that the pilot in there (and it would have been "he" when it was in service) could see to fly it. Practical and simple solutions are best.
@Deloooon2 жыл бұрын
why did the pilot have to power up the engine while folding the wings?
@sabot031962 жыл бұрын
He's driving a hydraulic pump through a separate gear box that he engages from the cockpit.
@Deloooon2 жыл бұрын
@@sabot03196 thank you for the explanation. cheers
@paulhargreaves93379 жыл бұрын
beautiful Aircraft
@Aero360Aviation6 жыл бұрын
Wow! What a cool airplane!
@SPak-rt2gb3 жыл бұрын
They ever get this fixed after the landing accident
@sabot031963 жыл бұрын
It was the Lysander that had the bad landing and it's still in bits on a rolling dolly. The Firefly is just finishing up its engine rebuild and should be flying next year.
@SPak-rt2gb3 жыл бұрын
@@sabot03196 If it was this Firefly it had an accident at the Gillespie airshow 2012 it's been fixed since according to Wikipedia
@troygroomes1043 жыл бұрын
Looks like Grumman's stovl wing used on the hellcat
@Twirlyhead4 жыл бұрын
Years before _Transformers_ too.
@r.g.o38793 жыл бұрын
I always thought that the front end bore a distinct ressemlance to a Stuka
@JohnyG292 жыл бұрын
??
@LV_CRAZY3 жыл бұрын
Slower than a Corsair?
@troygroomes1043 жыл бұрын
Very beautiful place and the successor to the Swordfish
@None-zc5vg3 жыл бұрын
Target-drone versions of the "Firefly" were being flown over my property in the late 1950s. It appears that they were to be used as [expensive] unmanned radio-controlled flying targets for guided missiles. The wreckage of these targets was meant to land safely in the sea.
@troygroomes1043 жыл бұрын
@@None-zc5vg bout like the f6f-5k drones used by the navy and airforce , in which cause the battle of Los angels in the late 1940's early 1950's
@richardgreathouse97023 жыл бұрын
If I recall correctly, the successor to the Swordfish as a torpedo plane/bomber was the Fairey Barracuda, not the Firefly, which was the successor to the Fairey Fulmar, the first two-seat so-called recon fighter the FAA deployed on WWII. That concept did not, understandibly, work out that well, and by the time the Firefly came into service, even the FAA knew it, using the Firefly as a recon and anti-sub/strike airplane, presumably equipped with smaller bombs. I have read the Firefly was quite satisfactory at such tasks. In any event, the Firefly came from a storied stable of WWII combat aircraft, and had some awesome design features, such as the folding wings displayed in the video.
@troygroomes1043 жыл бұрын
@@richardgreathouse9702 there was 2 successors to the Swordfish , the albacore (basically a swordfish with a canopy) then the barracuda
@richardgreathouse97023 жыл бұрын
@@troygroomes104 You are quite correct -- my omission in re line of descent.
@leefithian37043 жыл бұрын
Look at those folds !
@XrayxRich3 жыл бұрын
It sounds like a four banger tractor engine.
@Jimmy_Watt3 жыл бұрын
I googled ""cool as fuck," and this popped up.
@mattsta19646 жыл бұрын
Engineering art, right there
@noahdetterman26677 жыл бұрын
Now I notice he's giving it a lot of throttle when he puts the wings up, is that a mechanism that helps operate the hydraulic systems?
@myjoyfullife25436 жыл бұрын
Noah Detterman yes.
@ericthemauve5 жыл бұрын
@soaringtractor Ah! soaringtractor our American draft-dodger friend. I haven't seen any of his knuckle-dragging drivel for quite a while.
@MarsFKA5 жыл бұрын
@@ericthemauve That American is no "friend" of anyone. He has a mouth-foaming hatred of anything and everything British and an utter contempt, as we see in his first insulting and infantile comment in this thread, for anyone whom he thinks knows less than he does - which may be as many as two other people out of the entire human race. Everyone else, he just hates impartially. That thing that he calls his life is a horrible existence and I would not be him for any reason. However, it turns out that no one and nothing are spared from his hatred. His true nature was revealed in a recent thread on one of the multitude of sites that he infests, when, using his "wilburfinnigan" I.D., he applauded the murder of American officers by their own troops in Vietnam - "fragging" it was called, because it was usually carried out by throwing a fragmentation grenade into an officer's dugout or tent. However little entertainment value that soaringtractor piece of shit might have previously had, he crossed the line with that comment.
@chipps10663 жыл бұрын
RR Griffon I believe.
@sabot031963 жыл бұрын
And just freshly rebuilt.
@Алекандр-п3ы4 жыл бұрын
She is beautiful ,,//!
@a.wilson19796 жыл бұрын
What sound !
@shanecasey26046 жыл бұрын
A. Wilson that one
@afterburner28696 жыл бұрын
This aircraft was canceled after only one season.
@spawnof2006 жыл бұрын
there were 1700 produced, it saw service from 1943 to as late as 1962
@afterburner28696 жыл бұрын
spawnof200 I was making a bad joke. There was a great tv show called Firefly that was canceled after only one season.
@spawnof2006 жыл бұрын
ah sorry, ive not seen firefly
@MarsFKA5 жыл бұрын
@@afterburner2869 Heheh. I have that series on DVD, and "Serenity".
@wervelstorm75595 жыл бұрын
It flew right over his head. Padum
@michaelbowes98945 жыл бұрын
Standard armament was 4x20 mills. This must been a radar/recon a/c
@Mishn05 жыл бұрын
Recon / strike fighter. I don't believe it was equipped with radar. Starboard wing tank has a searchlight, not a radar antenna.
@arielcampagnola13282 жыл бұрын
👍👍👍👍
@digranni1286 жыл бұрын
Fuel tanks ?🤔
@yahatinda5 жыл бұрын
DIHEDRAL VARI-WING....................KOOL
@mestrebruno901511 жыл бұрын
very bealtiful
@luisantoniomarrega11206 жыл бұрын
Ja vi muito filme com caças dobrando as asas mas eu pensava que isso era apenas terefa dos pilotos. Rio de Janeiro RJ Brasil
@DavidSmith-tc3se5 жыл бұрын
Didnt she crash at duxford ?
@sabot031965 жыл бұрын
David Smith this is the Canadian one in Hamilton, Ontario. She currently under refit and will be back on the flight line next year.
@leefithian37043 жыл бұрын
Gorgeous
@williamallen49545 жыл бұрын
Cool as hell.
@cbennetts27467 жыл бұрын
looks like a night fighter variation
@myjoyfullife25436 жыл бұрын
calder bennetts it's a daytime reconnaissance fighter that used to take off of aircraft carriers.
@cbennetts27466 жыл бұрын
A Warbird Pilot Wife's Diary only said that due to the radar ball
@jimyoung21886 жыл бұрын
no they are just naval colours
@benjafovi1cr3286 жыл бұрын
calder bennetts Its a....a piece o shit.
@jimyoung21886 жыл бұрын
it takes shit to see it buddy
@joehollow25056 жыл бұрын
At first i thought it was a toy
@jimbobjones18586 жыл бұрын
Yeah, until the pilot moved his head and the other guy came walking up, I though it was an RC model!
@sabot031966 жыл бұрын
They're just about to roll her back out of refit. I should shoot the new footage with my tilt shift lens and then it really will look like a toy.
@kokooo009 жыл бұрын
UK的审美观,跪了
@李行-g8z9 жыл бұрын
哇,这声音真结实。
@有量追9 жыл бұрын
听声音感觉是柴油机
@kokooo009 жыл бұрын
朱蕾 排量太大
@cicak24046 жыл бұрын
What is the bulge on the wing?
@jwenting6 жыл бұрын
search radar on one side, searchlight on the other.
@tonysmith23606 жыл бұрын
Radiator I think
@ahorsewithnoname6436 жыл бұрын
Muhammad Averoes Radar on port wing searchlight on starboard wing.
@louielouiepks5 жыл бұрын
Sounds like my old tractor
@billstewart54212 жыл бұрын
Sounds like a rock crusher!!!!!
@petercavellini32326 жыл бұрын
No wonder we off loaded them to the Canadian Navy!🤔😎
@richardputz32335 жыл бұрын
Peter Cavellini Yeah,thanks for the submarines too !!!
@PeteCourtier5 жыл бұрын
Richard Putz and the aircraft carriers😁
@troutmaskbob6 жыл бұрын
LOOKS LIKE IT DID ONE THING RIGHT.
@scout0056 жыл бұрын
Too Cool
@rexhowells70155 жыл бұрын
I wanted to see it fly, not fold it's wings up 😞
@sabot031965 жыл бұрын
She’s currently in refit. As far as I know she’ll be returned to flight status later this year. Once she’s in the air again, I’ll be sure to post up some video.
@justins.12835 жыл бұрын
Restoring this bird to flight had to be a monumental effort ! Thank you for preserving a piece of aviation history. The wing folding design is unusual.
@sabot031965 жыл бұрын
@@justins.1283 The Canadian Warplane Heritage Museum is very much a flying museum. When I took the video, she was very active in their flight program but as you know, these old girls need some TLC from time to time. The wings needed a bunch of work to the folding mechanism and the engine and prop needed a rebuild. I think they're close to static runs for the engine and prop in the next month or so. It'll be good to see her back in the air. At least it wasn't a complete ground up restoration.
@robiulhasanrobin99275 жыл бұрын
at first it looks like rc plane
@bearbon26 жыл бұрын
Griffon engine sounds like a tractor.
@xx64892 жыл бұрын
He broke. It....
@lee2lee6665 жыл бұрын
잘만든 rc인줄 알았는대
@sukrukizil6 жыл бұрын
Transformers
@MsDichotomy5 жыл бұрын
Running a bit. rich at idle
@Mishn05 жыл бұрын
Probably part of the shut-down checklist, "set mixture to auto rich" or some such.
@graemewilliams13086 жыл бұрын
Firefly = Me 109 fodder.
@peterstubbs59346 жыл бұрын
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
@Mishn06 жыл бұрын
Not when it has some Corsairs or Seafires flying cover.
@royperkins38516 жыл бұрын
Graeme Williams never-ending stupidity this planes main opponent was German U-boats in the Atlantic if one ever crossed paths with a me-109 it wasn't recorded by the Germans and despite what the computer jockeys say they were quality serving as anti submarine and target tugs well into the 1960s including some in the post war German bundesch luft,so your insult to the old girl fell very short ,take your keyboard and crawl back into your mom's basement!
@graemewilliams13086 жыл бұрын
I don't have a "MOM" or a basement, what now ?
@Mishn06 жыл бұрын
@Graeme Williams - Dude, he gave you a ready made alibi for your stupid comment. You should have taken it. Now it's all on your head.