Fast zoom lens battle: Canon 17-55 f2.8, Sigma 18-35 f1.8, Tamron 17-50 f2.8 VC, Sigma 17-50 f2.8 OS

A full comparison video of these four fast standard zoom lenses, available for APS-C Canon cameras. Any one of them is an ideal upgrade to your kit lens. This video took a LONG time to put together...hope you all find it useful! Here are some links to full reviews:
Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 VC: • Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 V...
Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 OS HSM: • Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 OS...
Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 HSM: • Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 DC...
Canon 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM: • Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2...
If you've found this or other videos I've made to be helpful, then support me on Patreon! www.patreon.com/christopherfr...
All samples, pictures and footage taken by me on my trusty Canon 60D.
Equipment I use to make my videos (Amazon affiliate links):
Canon EOS R5: geni.us/CanonEOSR5Body
Canon EF-RF Adaptor: geni.us/CanonEFtoRF
Sigma 50mm f/1.4 'Art': geni.us/Sigma50mm14Art
Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 IS STM: geni.us/CanonRF35mm18Macro
Marumi Fit and Slim CPL Filter: geni.us/MarumiFitSlim77
AudioTechnica AT2020USB+ Microphone: geni.us/AT2020USBPlusMic
Rode Smartlav+ Microphone: geni.us/RodeSmartLavalierPlus
Rode SC3 adapter: geni.us/RodeSC3MicAdaptor
Zoom H1n Recorder: geni.us/ZoomH1nMiniRecorder
DJI Mini 2 Drone: geni.us/DJIMini2FlyMore
Music: 'Shades of Spring', Kevin Macleod (www.incompetech.com)

[@manjeetsinghbhati3939]

He is the best lens reviewer of all time!!

[@blee_d]

4 years later i still agree

[@kotzott]

@@blee_d This is me in 2024 still agreeing.

[@sakets]

This video really deserves the appreciation. The best part is how you use the same brick clad building with white windows for all reviews. It is really very very helpful to relate back with other reviews in terms of sharpness and chromatic aberration. You have definitely gained a lot more respect from many followers worldwide. People always like easy to understand 'quality' reviews. That comparison chart in the end, I'm sure many of us paused on that and had a nice summarised understanding. You are significantly helping people make better choices and learn technicalities of picture quality (for example: stepping down a bit to get better sharpness). Thanks a ton for your efforts.

[@christopherfrost]

+Saket Sarupria Thanks so much for your encouraging words! Glad you enjoy the reviews.

[@pollux7961]

+Christopher Frost Photography I agree with Saket Sarupria. Before, I was kind of annoyed with the same picture again and again (brick wall). But then it grew on me and realized that it was the best way to compare all of the lenses (although you have to switch in between videos). Most of the time I watch your reviews for reference when buying new lenses. Really helped me a lot and never have I made a wrong choice with my lenses! I'd say "keep it up" but then I might end up buying new lenses again and again. Haha. But still, it's always nice to get updated with the new lenses from your KZbin channel.

[@sakets]

+Norman Mascarinas I am in the same dilemma. I have bought 4 lenses after watching Chris's videos. The videos convey a lot of background knowledge to use the gear for better results.

[@DesoloZantas]

ikr

[@user-ro6bo4ib1m]

Finally -great reviews, nice and short, detailed and no extra jokes and time spend + not disturbing music & calm voice. VERY good! Thank you for your time and energy spend, people get amazing reviews -all questions answered and 99% of topics covered. Please continue your work.

[@ble9512]

This is what any serious lens review video (of other authors) should be like. Thorough and relevant, but concise and approachable even for non-professionals. Thank you for your excellent videos.

[@teafoo]

this is by far the highest quality review out of any other one on youtube, amazingly good job!

[@symontemplah4]

I just got the Sigma 17 - 50mm and it is such a beast! Even on my cheap Rebel T7, it makes it look and feel like a super professional camera and it takes really sharp pics! videos are the best with this lens! Best lens investment thus far!

[@zephyrderg]

It is a fantastic lens, I love using it on my Nikon D7100

[@mattkulcar6938]

Mr. Frost, your reviews are clear, concise and very methodical, I think you offer the best comparisons on youtube and appreciate the time and effort you put into each and every video, cheers.

[@christopherfrost]

Thanks so much for your kind words!

[@ssingh6197]

Hands down the best lens review format on KZbin PERIOD! The narration, the examples, and no fanboyism.

[@ryanchernochan9366]

This is an older review but I watched it about a month ago and it lead me to buy the sigma 17-50. I couldn’t be happier, it’s become my favorite lens. Just goes to show these reviews stand the test of time. Thanks for the great review video.

[@driesalkemade]

Wow! This is one of the best comparison video's i've ever seen! Very enlightening. Big thanks!

[@presleypryce6425]

Your time to make this video is much appreciated! I was debating between the Sigma lenses and this video helped with making the decision! Thank you!!!

[@cheegers420]

Thank you for putting this together! It really helped me. I know it took considerable time and effort to put this together. One of the top reviews I have ever seen. Great job!

[@marbogbr]

Thank you. The Sigma 17-50 it is then.

[@VadimOm]

and how is it to you after a year?)

[@marbogbr]

Very happy with it. Super sharp and great build. Cost me less than £200 a year ago.

[@styx9133]

ebay?

[@Fraaankiee]

styx no, toys r us

[@VadimOm]

mark b may sound stupid, but is it much sharper than kit lens?

[@Rationalific]

This is the best lens comparison video I've ever seen! Excellent work!

[@arijitghosh6378]

Thank you so much for putting in all the time and effort to put together this video. It was great! I think it will help a lot of people make an informed decision about which lens they want to get.

[@karlsalat]

Awesome comparison 👍. Very well done. Especially love how you show the f1.8 in comparison to the other f2.8 lenses 👏

[@CinematicTechnologies]

Detailed, entertaining, informative, easy to understand... when it comes to reviews, I don't think there's anyone better! Thank you so much.

[@michaelsorrow7490]

Ethan Swords Absolutely. I haven't seen better reviews on KZbin yet. Please, keep up the good work.

[@Stubbleman]

+Ethan Swords Also Agree!

[@joeygwood]

Watching this in 2020. Amazing review! I've been considering the Canon 17-55 as an upgrade to my kit lens for handheld work. I've also heard a lot of good things about the Sigma 18-35, so I'll probably pick one of those up as well for tripod work. Thanks Chris!

[@martinlangford]

Your video reviews are brilliant; they must take ages to put together but I can't think of a better way of comparing lenses. Thank-you so much for your time preparing these.

[@juliengaron2177]

Amazing review, covers all of the important stuff (often overlooked by other reviewers who only mention specs) in great depth. I'll definitely come back to your channel for other lens reviews!

[@ChangLiuPhotography]

thank you for your hard work, great video.

[@normcook9335]

Thanks, very informative and well produced video.

[@___Me_]

This is the best comparison video I've seen so far. The split screens really help to make an objective comparison. Glad I went for the sigma 17-50 instead of upgrading my old tamron 17-50!

[@SentientBowlofRaisinBranCereal]

Wow, this video was a huuuuge help to me. This was by far the most thorough comparison of the 4 lenses I've been hung up on for weeks. Thanks so much for putting in the hard work, I now know what lens will work best for me personally. Cheers!

[@Vikingdescendent]

The Sigma 16mm f1.4 DC DN combined with Sony a6500, and Sony's Clear Image Zoom, is a great option, giving the user a x2 zoom factor while maintaining a fast f1.4. Add the built in 5 axis body stabilization and it becomes an amazing 16 - 32mm f1.4 combination!

[@pitmaster05]

Another great review from you Chris. There is however one mayor focus issue with some copies of the Sigma 18-35. I purchased my copy a year ago, and had the focusing issues on my Canon 80D. The lens consistently back focused in Live View, and when focusing through the viewfinder has been almost always front-focusing. It was very difficult if not impossible to get the desired focus, i managed to get maybe 1 usable image out of 15. I contacted my supplier and they said that it is a known issue (specially when pared with Canon 80D) and gave me a replacement copy, but i had similar issues with this copy too (a bit better, but not as it should be). Supplier offered me two options: to purchase additional USB dock and perform the calibration (which at the time looked a bit complicated to me, and as i understand it is not always successful, and also this USB dock is additional $60), or to send my Sigma along with my camera (Canon 80D) to specialised Sigma service (which in my case is in another country) for calibration. I really love the look and the feel of the lens, it is the great looking piece of glass, but those issues were a deal breaker for me so i eventually opted for Canon 17-55 instead, and so far i'm very pleased with this lens. I understand that only some copies of Sigma 18-35 have those issues, but i thought that maybe it will be useful for someone if i share my experience.

[@livenow0619]

Hello there! Thank God that I read your comment here coz' I also own Canon 80D as you do and planned to buy sigma 18-35. Though I like canon 17-55 because it's a lot cheaper, I'm gearing on buying the L series lens such as 24-70 II or 85mm f/1.4. Have you tried using full frame lens on the 80D coz' I watched the video of Tony Northrup and he said not to use them on the crop sensor camera body coz' it won't be as sharp as using them on full frame camera.... I own 50mm f/1.8 and kit lens 18-135mm and now I want to upgrade my lens to a much sharper lens... Thanks in advance for replying!

[@kevinsilcock9392]

Excellent video! This sums up my decision I had last week. I have been researching a kit upgrade lens for about a fortnight. Finally took the plunge and ordered a canon 17-55 f2.8, it was a close decision between that and the sigma 18-35, to be honest the extra zoom range swung it for me. Hope I won't be disappointed! Keep up the good work!

[@simonbrooks399]

Very clear and organised, this was enjoyable to watch, thanks Chris!

[@sambam007]

Your vids are really good. 10/10 still deciding but your helping !

[@FAKoLL]

thanks for your great videos. very detailed and well made. i'm buying the sigma 17-50 2.8. starting wedding and indoor events. i think i will be happy with it :)

[@gupu81]

Excellent presentation! I am into amateur photography for 7-8 years now, and I have never looked so deep into a lens so far. Thank you for educating me. Please keep up the good work.

[@Marcin79W]

Thanks mate for all the reviews, always very useful and pleasure to watch.

[@OmarCordy]

I got the Sigma 17-50 last week and broke it in on 2day festival. So far so good. I'm loving quality and range on my crop sensor.

[@jaujud]

For a second I thought you broke it and how unlucky you are. You scared me :D

[@mumtahidakash]

Omar Cordy didn’t get your comment Did you break the lens?

[@dennisgeake2156]

@@mumtahidakash, "broke it in" is another way of saying he used his new lens for the first time. It's just a figure of speech. Gotta love English.

[@machsakai]

Thanks , very nice video.

[@LoneGRoEnt]

Great video. It's amazing that these lenses are so old and still being sold. Amazing!

[@sebbytrial]

By far, the best lens review. Keep it up mate!

[@nguyenmanhdung7514]

Very useful:) ! Im going to buy the sigma 17-50mm. Affordable price with good image quality

[@T3ijaelbox]

Thank you sir...nice & very helpful video tutorial.......

[@jimmywinskowski5489]

This review is SO great! I'm shocked you don't have any affiliate links to the lenses themselves. Thank you so much!

[@carlosc.639]

Magnificent job! All your videos are so useful!

[@Chapter3Fan]

Dude ... you probably hear this all the time but, man ... how awesome are your reviews !?! All I ever want to know about lenses for my Canon are right there in your video list. Thanks a milion ! I recently got the 50mm 1.8 STM after watching your review and I am getting by far the sharpest images I ever got with my 550D. I had no idea it could do that :D I love the lens so much, just need to learn to control the DOF when taking pictures of more than 1 person. Now I just need to save a bit for this Sigma 17-50mm f2.8 OS. Would that one's sharpness be comparable to the 50mm 1.8 STM ? Cuz the default kit-lens' got to go now that I know what my 550d can do :p

[@christopherfrost]

+Philippe Vanagt Glad you're enjoying the reviews! Both those lenses will be similarly sharp at f/2.8 - very sharp

[@silencekj]

Outstanding review thanks for your time!! I would love that 1.8.....but i might just settle for the sig 2.8 simply because of price, zoom and quality combo more bang for buck!!!

[@Kugelwanze]

Thank you Chris for your detailed (as always) reviews! Keep it that way, I love it :)

[@JoshTate]

wow the Tamron lens is sooooooooooo soft compared to the others.

[@IAMADIRTRIDER]

14:15 If you want a quick answer! Great video!

[@wayphun72]

Solid advice, thanks!

[@zahirjacobs716]

Thanks mate.

[@francisselvam5318]

Nanbenda😘 (Tamil)

[@robertmueller6979]

You sir... are my new hero

[@b1lf435]

Excellent, excellent review Christopher. Still cannot decide! Leaning towards Sigma 18-35 1.8, with the Canon 17-55 2.8 & Sigma 17-50 2.8 closely behind. All 3 have such a great appeal.

[@SixthSandwich]

As always, thanks for the review Christ! Yours is the best!

[@BobDiaz123]

I was considering the Sigma 18-35mm F1.8, but the weight and cost were the downsides. However, it's a great lens. In the end I found the Sigma 17-50mm F2.8 used at a reasonable price, so I went for it. It's also a great lens and very useful.

[@b.r.srihari4099]

I'm confused b/w sigma 18-35 and sigma 17-50.....I'm a hobbyist..I.use canon 77d occasionally for family events(indoor), travel and pilgrimage.... How much image quality should I compromise if I were to pick sigma 17-50?

[@BobDiaz123]

@@b.r.srihari4099 IF you took the two lenses and looked very closely in a large sized print, you might notice a slight improvement in the sharpness of the Sigma 18-33 F1.8, however is not a major difference. I find my Sigma 17-50mm F2.8 takes great shots that are sharp and have good contrast. The difference in sharpness is too small to worry about.

[@b.r.srihari4099]

@@BobDiaz123 Thanks a lot for your reply

[@naordaniel]

Hi Christopher, excellent review as always! I have a canon 80D and thinking about purchasing the Sigma 18-35 1.8 but am worried about some complaints I heard regarding the Autofocus not working properly with the canon 70D, and maybe the problems will persist on the 80D, should I take the risk?

[@MrVeekz]

Naor Daniel have you bought it? I have the 80d and I’m considering the same thing now

[@aight365]

Have any one you guys bought it? Man, I wish there was a new lens alternative/successor

[@williamfriggle]

Thanks for taking the time to make this video. I have been thinking about two of these lenses and your video helped a lot.

[@brianroyalroberts]

I'm sure this did indeed take a long time to edit, but thank you! Very, very thorough and helpful. Excellent work.

[@K3V0M]

THANK YOU. I want to replace my 600D's Kit Lens and needed a good comparison between the Tamron and the Sigma 17-50mm lenses. I will check out some other reviews but I am pretty sure that I will get the Sigma. :) In Germany the price difference is just about 10€ (lowest prices) at the moment.

[@christopherfrost]

Get the Sigma! Check out my full review of the lens if you need to know more :-)

[@K3V0M]

Alright! Thanks for replying so quickly.

[@K3V0M]

But I got a question. Does f/2.8 really mean twice as much light as f/3.5 and four times more light than f/5.6?! :o

[@christopherfrost]

KRusEdits f/2.8 is 66% more light than f/3.5, 100% more than f/4, and four times more than f/5.6

[@Aichasheart]

"It has the others for breakfast" :-D Great review, thanks a lot!

[@HDico2013]

Thanks for the awesome comparison mate! That was exactly what I was looking for!

[@atenean1]

Awesome review... really helped me a lot deciding which way to go with these lenses. Keep up the good work!

[@thatfellarosto]

I think the sigma 17-50 was significantly sharper at times

[@sanantonio855]

Me too. I may be biased because I just bought one, but still

[@Vinizuca]

Not sharper, more contrast. 3 years for this answer :)

[@thatfellarosto]

@@Vinizuca ive used all 3 (except for the tamron), and in my own experience the sigma 17-50 was the sharpest wide open

[@Vinizuca]

@@thatfellarosto but the difference shown in the video is more a function of contrast. Sharpness was very subtle. But the difference in contrast is huge.

[@juanball5480]

The overall winner here is Sigma 17-50 mm f2.8

[@thinhvcoin]

Great video, very informative as always. I totally agree with your opinion. This is the way that lenses review should be done. Thank you and keep up the great work.

[@martychmelik1457]

This is probably the best video out there. Watched probably hundreds....maybe thousands. Great job man.

[@JeremyGalloway]

I had the Sigma 17-50, and it would consistently front focus at focal lengths below 24mm, effectively ruining shots. Zoomed in to 24-50, the autofocus performed fine, which was actually a bummer - because the performance was inconsistent through the zoom range, I couldn't compensate for it with the camera's autofocus adjustment. Many others have cited the same issue on their Canon bodies (mine was a 70D). It's really a shame, because the lens is good value for the money, but I ultimately returned it, because the inability to get good shots below 24mm was a total dealbreaker. I really want the Canon 17-55 now, but the price increase is a bit ridiculous in my opinion. For that money, I'm considering the Sigma 18-35 instead.

[@christianrobillos6600]

Jeremy Galloway canon 70D sucks. to be honest, 60D is much better.

[@martycee]

I've read that there used to be a noticeable variation in different examples of the Sigma. One guy reported being on his third before he was satisfied. I'm seriously considering the Sigma to replace my sickly non-VC Tamron 17-50 that might not make it out of the Tamron workshop if too expensive to fix. But if buying a Sigma is something of a lottery that might be a deal breaker. Although the options are pretty limited at that price point.

[@themjian]

I experienced the exact same issue, sent it to Sigma twice, didn't help. In 2017, this lens is useful on DPAF Canon DSLRs.It shines on the 800D/200D/77D as they have a very fast Digic 7 aided DPAF. When I use 7D, 50D and 600D and (Friend's 60D & 80D) before, it sucks at wide angle as it front focused and is inconsistent too, so even 80D's W & T MFA didn't help much. But now, with 800D/T7i, I switched to Live view and it's as sharp as the Primes, fast AF with tracking (miraculously) and is amazing! Just glad that I haven't got rid of it as there are no other comparable value for money lenses.

[@themjian]

If you are using 80D, it's good as long as the lens copy is consistent, you can correct the wide or telephoto front/back AF with 80D's MFA. And if you are okay with shooting Live view, the lens works great on all DPAF: 70D, 80D, T7i/800D, 200D, 77D and maybe with M5/6/100 with EF-M adapter.

[@bikash3003]

Themi P i have canon 200d do u think sigma 17-50mm will give me sharpest image or should i go for canon 17-55mm expensive one.??

[@bensrisawart9368]

Damn I just bought a 2nd handTamron for USD $200 and I saw this video. I am such a noob.

[@miloradstrbacki4248]

the same thing happened to me! :l I don't know how i didn't come across this video, i did a lot of research about the lens, then after buying it i realised it is NOT sharp at 50mm f/2.8. I'll sell it and drop the extra 50$ for the Sigma for sure!

[@eddmaster9]

Feel sorry for you bro... Hope that you managed to get great pics out of that Tamron, and that by now you've improved your setup!

[@stelladevania3607]

How do you like it? The sigma is almost 2 times the price of Tamron so I'm thinking of going for the tamron

[@keco27]

I'll buy it

[@iNet16]

I'm so happy with my Canon 17-55. Very accurate review, good job!

[@tamasvarga67]

The best review of these lenses. Thank you for putting it together!

[@rickygeeish]

I've got a Tamron 28-75mm 2.8. Its a soft, fuzzy turd of a lens. horrible quality. Stay away.

[@Noeman2009]

Ricky Gee Maybe that big aperture lens was a new thing for you? I've been in your position before even with my L lens. The problem usually about focusing and very shallow depth of field. After several times getting to know how to use it properly, I always get better and sharp picture.

[@rickygeeish]

Ary Himawan Um, no. Nothing new....

[@moimartinez8444]

Same Its shit lens =/

[@sanantonio855]

The problem with cheapo 2.8 lenses is that the sharpness is crap at f/2.8, which destroys the very purpose of the lens since you have to use it at f/4 to get good results

[@MohamedFazilsulaiman]

But DxOmark's scores shows that sigma 17-50(score=16) is better than canon 17-55.(score=15)

[@vinaychinapanjwani2060]

That is BIAS WEBSITE, promoting nikon

[@dougcliff4589]

your reviews are excellent. easy to understand and you cover the important points. Keep up the good work.

[@giangvu7902]

A very nice review, unlike many other videos on KZbin. Thanks!

[@willz2323]

Why didn't Sigma put IS in that lens!? Thats a deal-breaker for me.

[@christopherfrost]

+Willz I read an interview where the CEO said he wanted to include OS, but it was already such a challenge just to produce an f/1.8 zoom that they couldn't at that stage. Makes sense to me really, still, a shame

[@bubbas.1180]

+Willz You don't really need IS for 18-35mm... And for video you can always use those camera stabilizers...

[@jc4448]

+Taiguara Dicó but even with stabilizer the videos still will shake isnt it?

[@bubbas.1180]

Not really... take a look on this gif, there are many models of camera stabilizers and some cameras have the sensor stabilizer too. It's a great lens for this price, in special for me in Brazil, here one dollar worths 4 reais. 9gag.com/gag/awrXb5x/camera-stabilizer

[@toaidang5873]

+Taiguara Dicó But that camera in the gif is powered by anti-gravity generator....

[@ate_g]

Thank you so much Chris! This was the review that convinced me to get the Sigma 17-50. Definitely worth the upgrade from my kit lens! Thank you so much!

[@lordmacram]

Thanks for making this video, extremely helpful. Your comparisons are spot on!

[@jasonsstale8188]

Just the review I needed to clear any doubts about the Sigma 17-50mm f2.8! Definitely will get the lens. I'll will be shooting my first wedding next month in which I have 2 months to prepare. While preparing, i quickly found out the nikkor 50 f1.8 is a huge challenge for indoors and tight spaces. So I needed a more versatile fast lens, primarily with the option to shoot wide angle. So I've been researching for weeks, considering many prime and zoom lenses and then I found this helpful video. I will definitely get the more versatile zoom lens, Sigma 17-50mm f2.8. Thanks for this methodological, in-depth comparison! Loved your narration by the way.

[@aeromorris05]

Outstanding product review. Informative, unbiased, very detailed yet easy to digest. Well done!

[@Outlast1965]

Clear distinction for all the 4 lenses Chris! Truly my short list among the four and eyeing to save up are the Sigma 17-50mm and the 18 -35mm "art" lens. Have read and heard that the 18-35 mm of Sigma tops most reviews, yet it now counts how my pocket power can sustain its cost. Thank you for sharing, well explained! Regards.

[@roundballrolls2762]

Just happened upon this comparison whilst researching a new lens upgrade for my Canon.You've just sold me on the 17-50 Sigma. Thank you for your great efforts.

[@michaelsorrow7490]

I just replaced my kit lens with the Sigma 17-50mm, thanks to your thorough review. Initial tests I've done so far blew me away. For the money, excellent value indeed. Thank you.

[@kevincanniff9877]

Wow, Christopher, vast amount of work and great job on your critique of the technical understanding. I simply enjoy your work you have equal sided talents on both sides of the lens. You saved me from making a mistake and informed me as well. Thank you very much, please keep up the work.

[@steylor]

Thanks for the time you put in this, it was exacty the comparison I was looking for.

[@roireshef]

You are awesome! you gave absolutely *all* the relevant information I needed to make a decision. You took me from 0 to 100 in just 17:00 minutes and I thank you for that. Great job!

[@MTA621]

Great job putting them all together. Keep up the good work.

[@fuego96]

Impressed with the lens review itself ! Personal thoughts and objective reviewing were extremely well balanced.

[@frd5868]

even 6 years later, this video is really helped me to decide my next lens. Thankyou very much!

[@telechivictor]

The best videos ever from all reviewers of the lenses !!!! Wish you make a video for the 70-200 2.8 canon and both tamron

[@rosecottagegarden]

Well done review comparison! I truly appreciate your time and hard work! Thank you so much!

[@miike111]

Thanks for the review on all the lens in this episode. It was good to see what the lens can offer in photography or video. I would choose the 18-35mm f1.8 because better lens in value and quality and will last a long time.

[@mikejonce1]

Great work! I love your videos! So thorough, and so much help for all of us!

[@cjbjcb5377]

yet again, great reviews, good clear thoughts. I’m heading for the sigma 17-50. Thank-you

[@simplesoundsyouneed2824]

Even 5 years later you helped me out with this review. The sigma lens (17-50) is just a good pick. Thank you very much.

[@YHWHsCrusader]

Thanks for your hard work on this video! I purchased the Sigma 17-50 last year based on this review. I ended up returning it because of the clicking when autofocusing. I am finally purchasing the Canon 17-55 now and hope the autofocus will be a bit quieter for my video work. Thanks again Christopher!

[@okwilk]

Great review. I really appreciate seeing both tamron and sigma side by side as these are two possible options for me (a casual nikon user). Comparing the Sigma 18-35 was a bit unfair. Personally I'd rather have Nikon standard zoom lens out there, but this would mean using nikon body and probably different image quality overall so I won't complain. I really like your reviews, showing the same picture for each lens is a very good idea as it gives an opportunity to see the lens image quality, rather than photography skills (vs other reviews on youtube). You sir got a big like and subscribe. Keep it up !:)

[@DashWatson]

Thank you kindly for this highly informative comparison. You helped me choose the best value for money lens. I was looking at the Tamron earlier, but your videos made me realize that the Sigma is much much better.

[@jessicazafra2358]

Best Review! Thank you so much! You made choosing between some of these lens so much easier. It's much appreciated! :)

[@houdiinii]

This is such an incredibly good review! It makes the decision which lens to buy so much easier! Thank you very much :)

[@MRHKP-]

Excellent reviews, thanks for your hard work!

[@yuripopchenko8247]

This is an outstanding review! Thank you so much for it!

[@RosiBosi]

Very useful and incredibly well made! Thanks for the hard work and sharing it with us! Much appreciated and it helped me take a decision!

[@JamalPhoenix]

Insane comparison this must have taken forever!! Thanks for the summary at the end to!

[@Nonaxisymmetric]

Thanks for a great video :-) It really helped me make a decision about which lens to buy. I appreciate the detailed comparisons and the time you have put into make the video. Impressive work.

[@Rick9814]

Thank you for this video! It's incredibly helpful. And this one must have taken a ton of work to make! Really great!

[@anirbanbhattacharjee3474]

Brilliant review Christopher 👌👍👏. I have always first read your reviews before buying any lens. Recently bought the Sigma 17-50 f2.8 lens featured here only after reading all your reviews on it. Its an amazing lens. I also feel that nowadays with so much competition between different lens manufacturers, almost all lenses fare neck to neck in performance. Thanks again for the review. Keep them coming 👍

[@ravikantsjadhav]

Very nice and detailed review, Looking forward for more lens reviews.