Features and Specifications of the Tactical One Piece Scope Mount

[@Levidanielz]

Id love to try one. I've been running a spuhr for a long time. But would love to try an Area 419 too. Im sure these are every bit as good as all the products that I own.

[@witchell8976]

So cool!! I need one of these so badly.

[@Dany-rq5cm]

What about the two small holes on the side? Are they compatible with other manufacturers ACIs?

[@Mkkboi]

I was about to order a spurh but den your Brand Ambassador Daryl in AK told me about these! Beautiful product Thanks for the review!!

[@area419]

Daryl is the man!

[@TanJ197]

@area419 any idea if a smooth top or hunter model will be available in the future? I’d rather go with a 1 piece mount like this one but might have to go with your rings if there’s no plan for a more basic model.

[@area419]

Our Match scope rings are smooth-top, and the Hunt rings (Summer 2024) will be smooth-top as well.

[@enayetchowdhury105]

Please, one with QD mount. Great product.

[@davidlaroche8928]

Running 2 sets of the 419 rings. They are supreme. Did I heard a potential cantilever one piece........ that would be sweet

[@area419]

That'll come, along with a lighter hunting style ring. As soon as we get good at these being in-stock, the next thing will come out.

[@77OliverPuller]

Torque for accessory screws, standard bubble level to be specific? Thanks!

[@area419]

@@77OliverPuller 18 (15-20, depending on the torque tools you have available), just like the caps

[@77OliverPuller]

@area419 thanks, wanted to make sure.

[@MrJayBlackwind]

Hakan Spuhr and a SP4602 and ISMS come to my mind

[@area419]

Hakan is a great guy and a friend, he makes a really solid product.

[@77OliverPuller]

No recoil lugs other than the bolts?

[@area419]

No, the 4 cross-bolts are designed to function as the lugs

[@markdorman426]

Please make it in "low" - 28mm / 1.10" would be perfect.

[@area419]

Without knowing tube size, that is likely best suited for 2-piece rings. At a certain height (lowness) a one-piece starts to not work from a design standpoint.

[@markdorman426]

I was hoping a low height for 34mm. But if it won't work well I understand. I'll end up getting your 2-piece setup. Any chance you'll add a diving board system to the 2-piece rings?

[@area419]

@@markdorman426 It's not something we have planned at this time. Not to say it'll never happen, but the torque created by an item on the diving board lends itself better to the one-piece mount.

[@ayougo]

Heavy for a 35mm. Reptilia cant. mount is 5.7 oz. Spuhr is 7.8oz

[@StuninRub]

If you are going to count oz, precision rifles aren't for you anyways.

[@ayougo]

@@StuninRub Have you ever been in combat?

[@dennis9695]

Had whole platoon wiped out due to 1.7oz disadvantage 😂

[@lundysden6781]

nice!

[@thelittledetailscr7231]

Only $799 😊

[@area419]

For a couple of them, sure. $330 without diving board, and the diving boards are $80.

[@thelittledetailscr7231]

@@area419 niceeee

[@Mills141]

400$ 😂

[@area419]

With a diving board, yes, that's correct. Without, it's $330.

[@danielburnette9552]

The price is ridiculous. There is no precision or accuracy advantage over a solid set of standard rings. Claims of repeatability, and "more true" have no data to back them up and end up just sounding like buzzwords.

[@area419]

While you're certainly entitled to your own opinion, independent tests by some of the leading optic and rifle-system companies on earth have made their way back to us, and the process and design here are providing optical hold and attachment repeatability that are unsurpassed in the market. Again, you don't have to be a customer, but your opinion is not more important than the reality of the situation.

[@danielburnette9552]

@@area419 please provide links to this testing you speak of.

[@area419]

@@danielburnette9552 this is not public testing, rather internal that was shared with us by friends. And again, you don’t have to agree or believe, but I’d hate for you to be wrong without knowing it.

[@jdrollason]

There is a guy over on the install video of the Area 419 Rings that has the exact opposite argument. You two should go grab a beer.

[@scottsquires6186]

Looks like 220 just for scope rings are a good bit higher than should be