Still awaiting B&W signature speaker in a simplicity light colour
@siupingsamuelho98010 ай бұрын
聽歌房細size 用書架,大size 就一定用坐地喇叭啦!
@andychoy02116 ай бұрын
想請教:我要陳年burn in CD來煲佢(新買),有冇什麼要留意?我多年無玩音響了,點先算煲好對喇叭?見你有個short影住個喇叭膜嘅震動
@feverSoundHK6 ай бұрын
其實都係無乜特別,唔好長時間開太大聲,以免令音圈過熱就ok(國仁)
@nelne110 ай бұрын
地方問題, 我會揀書架。
@dannyhung627810 ай бұрын
一定正啦 ❤
@user-fs2kx7sp9z10 ай бұрын
I am an owner of Luxman L509x integrated and at this moment i am running B&W 702 signature.I am thinking of upgrading to B&W 805d4 signature and i will kindly ask you for your opinion on this mach?Do you think that this model of Luxman has the power to drive them as well how you will describe the sound of b%w 805d4 signature vs 805d4 .Thanks in advance.
@feverSoundHK10 ай бұрын
The Luxman 509X can drive the 805D4 speakers, but in larger spaces or at higher volumes, you might encounter some limitations. In fact, the 702 speakers you are currently using are even more challenging to drive. So, if you are satisfied with the performance of your 702 speakers, you should be similarly satisfied with the 805D4. However, it's essential to consider whether the bass output will be sufficient, as you may find that the 805D4 (whether it's the signature version or not) has slightly less bass compared to the 702. As for whether to opt for the signature version, it ultimately depends on your budget and whether you have a preference for the signature version's color.
@user-fs2kx7sp9z10 ай бұрын
Thanks a lot for your replay!@@feverSoundHK
@chitakwan251110 ай бұрын
屋企細,有冇咩All-in-one機可以配805 D4?
@feverSoundHK10 ай бұрын
其實今次夾試的 Boulder 866 就是一部 all in one~
@TerryTang-vw7cb10 ай бұрын
國仁 😄👍
@yautungkwok160310 ай бұрын
Support
@feverSoundHK10 ай бұрын
Thanks 東兄(國仁)
@micchan989410 ай бұрын
good
@warsshan10 ай бұрын
Boulder 866 👍👍👍
@feverSoundHK10 ай бұрын
下回報告就係佢(國仁)
@user-no6re4hz4s6 ай бұрын
J'ai une seule question pour faire mon choix et il meilleur le 805 D4 signature que le ( Focal Diablo Evo Utopia ) merci
@feverSoundHK6 ай бұрын
Si vous aimez les aigus brillants, alors optez pour B&W. Son apparence est également très élégante et son image sonore est excellente. Cependant, si vous préférez la reproduction fidèle de l'espace sonore, si vous accordez de l'importance à la vivacité musicale, alors Focal est plus adapté.
@user-no6re4hz4s5 ай бұрын
Mon choix se porte sur le Focal Diablo Evo j'hésite avec l'enceinte tad micro evolution ces un choix difficile qu'en pensez-vous
Heard these recently, and compared to the Borresen Z1. The Borresen makes these B&Ws sound like broken toys. Feel bad for anyone buying it.
@feverSoundHK10 ай бұрын
I agree that Borresen makes excellent speakers, but B&W also has a strong reputation. I'm afraid I can't share your perspective.
@meesmo410 ай бұрын
@@feverSoundHK Just like McIntosh, B&W survives purely and only on its past reputation from 801 matrix era. Things have changed. Everyone in hifi knows they are not the best, deep in their hearts. The 805D4 suffers the usual problems of too much treble energy, recessed lower mids, and a 'ported' bass sound lacking speed. There are so many other better choices in its price range, like Magico A1, Borresen Z1 or even TAD ME1. Any one of these are easily way better than the B&W. Why should anyone choose the B&W? I don't know of a single thing that B&W does better than those speakers. None.
@feverSoundHK10 ай бұрын
Your comment has a clear stance, and I'm not looking to engage in an argument with you. However, the bright nature of B&W's diamond tweeter is a characteristic of the design. The bass reflex port design is also quite common, and it's challenging to perceive this as a design flaw. I'd like to emphasize that we have tested many speakers, including the excellent ones you mentioned. They are not universally good or bad; their performance is tied to equipment matching and personal preferences. This is the fascinating aspect of audio.