Finally!! Israel Testing New Autonomous Artillery Rocket System

[@kimkristensen2816]

Denmark has also purchased PULS, and German seems interested as well. It is open architecture, other manufactures missiles can be added in the future, such as NSM

[@RobWalters-w7x]

Sounds like a much better deal in price and performance than the HIMARS

[@chase.7780]

They definitely are considering the massive variety of munitions they can fire, and the greater range that their EXTRA and Delilah missiles have compared to GMLRS from HIMARS or M270. The Delilah is specifically very useful since it has the alternative electro-optical/FLIR guidance, which can be used to eliminate ground-based jammers and SAMs, which have been an issue for GPS-guided GMLRS in Ukraine. The only other MLRS I know of that has something comparable to that capability is the Turkish TRG system which can fire laser-guided artillery rockets, but that requires a separate laser designator unit to work with the MLRS team whereas the PULS doesn’t need that.

[@Austin-cx2xe]

Difference is, these are all what the manufacturer states. They are trying to make money, of course they will try and make it sound better. HIMARS is battle proven and will be contiously upgrades. The PrSM will make HIMARS 10x more deadly. Also weight. The Israeli MLRS is not only a simply unlicensed copy of the 122mm grad rockets turned into guided ones but its much heavier.

[@DerekHenry-nf8md]

what performance, HIMARS is legendary from Ukraine

[@MaestroAbar]

The biggest deciding factor seems to be that PULS can accommodate non-proprietary missiles, and can be integrated into existing platforms. Dutch government most likely want to utilize domestic vehicles & missiles down the road, rather than 100% importing the entire system & munition.

[@antasosam8486]

@@MaestroAbar Some upgrade of HIMARS may possibly have the same or beter capabilities.

[@fransiskusyasmin4103]

Bravo israel😊

[@ΣπύροςΑυγέρης-β1λ]

Καλό είναι και η Ελλάδα Πρέπει να πάρει το LYNX.

[@NorbuWangmo-h6z]

God bless Israel ❤❤❤ Love from India 🙏🙏🙏

[@haydaromar1379]

🐗🐗🐗

[@NorbuWangmo-h6z]

@@haydaromar1379 mokamad 🐷🐷🐷 dajjal

[@TheM7016]

They eat cows

[@anondonakrek5267]

Love from Bangladesh ❤❤❤

[@bjarkehansen4911]

Funny how Denmark and the Netherlands have the same good taste in weapon systems. Colt Canada c8 IUR, CV-9035 IFV, and now Elbit PULS.

[@Homoprimatesapiens]

Very interesting and informative. Thanx a lot.

[@lovableulloriaqtomeetyu]

without war weapons the world is much better what do you think? we don't want anymore war madness tensions and conflicts between human and human

[@wreckincrew2714]

If Israel isn't developing World Class Weapon Systems then it is taking current systems and making them even better. HIMARS is 30+ year old tech. Still one of the best but Israel just upped the game significantly.

[@jdogdarkness]

Only in the sense that it's roots start there. The munitions it fires aren't the same also the system itself is much more capable than when introduced. PULS does seem be very capable & even has some advantages though.

[@lovableulloriaqtomeetyu]

The world is much better without war weapons what do you think?

[@GreatRaphael]

Every technological development lies on a previous one, this is how the world works. Plus, Israel has been a pioneer in many military technologies such as UAVs, Electronic Warfare, Cyberdefense, Active protection systems etc.

[@jdogdarkness]

@GreatRaphael true. I don't think the person saying "HIMARS is 30+ year old tech" understand that a systems name, doesnt mean its the same exact system for 30 years. Also, doesnt seem to realize HIMARS is just the launcher, not the munition. GMLRS is the standard rocket now, it isn't 30 years old. There's also minor upgrades such as GMLRS-ER(2x range) & more substantive upgrades to payload like GMLRS-AW(cluster munition replacement).

[@ioanbota9397]

I like they are so powerful

[@Chima4289]

PULS is open architecture system that is better suited for future European expansion plans. PULS has better mobility on European Theater, and it has simpler logistics. I am sure that PULS introduction will prompt further HIMARS evolution and development, resulting in better, cheaper system that could be easily optimized for different requirements.

[@engchoontan8483]

Integrate calculators for pathfinder-recon-scouts-recce... to adjust trim for region before using minus-one range (region minus-one). Kites with payloads(double-hinged auto-mechanical reaction pendulum) - techniques.

[@TheM7016]

Impressive

[@willymac5036]

One area that was not covered, at least in any significant depth, is mobility and transport. The PULS system is considerably heavier than the M142 HIMARS. The M142 HIMARS was developed directly from the M270 MLRS, as a lighter, expeditionary, air transportable system of rocket artillery. The M142 HIMARS combined weight (truck, pod, and 6 rockets) weighs in at 38,500 pounds, making it C-130 transportable. The PULS system, mounted on a HEMTT (Heavy Expanded Mobility Tactical Truck) is much heavier. The HEMTT truck by itself, with nothing on the back of it, weighs in at 42,500 pounds, making it 500 pounds overweight for a C-130. This means if you want to transport it by air, you need something comparable to a C-17 Globemaster or larger. Considering that over 2,500 C-130’s have been built, with over 1,000 in service with the US Armed forces alone, and only 279 C-17’s having been built, with only 222 in service with the US Armed Forces, it is easy to see why the U.S. uses the M142 HIMARS. The Dutch military however, not having the expeditionary requirements that the U.S. military has, doesn’t have to consider the weight or air transportability like the U.S. military does. Both systems have their place and are designed to meet the requirements of their users. Both systems are far superior to any Russian rocket artillery system, as all of Russia’s rocket artillery systems are unguided.

[@bertnl530]

Most of the trucks which are suitable for carrying the system are much lighter then the HEMMT, also with additional armour.

[@willymac5036]

@@bertnl530 although i can’t find the exact weight specifications of the PULS rocket artillery system itself, there is currently a “Light PULS” rocket artillery system under development for airborne and special forces. It will be C-130 transportable. There is currently no version of the PULS system that is C-130 transportable.

[@rolandxor179]

​@@willymac5036You can find a animation video on KZbin about the 'Light Pulse' and there they have two of the systems depicted as being air transported by Ch47 Chinook. It is a bit of a puzzle to me why HIMARS has just one pod instead of two. Are you sure the design limitation was the extra weight and not perhaps the width ? A m270 is 3m wide and a C-130 cargo area is 3.02m wide leaving very little margin.

[@RR-us2kp]

Lot of European countries use something called Airbus A400M. Look it up

[@willymac5036]

@@RR-us2kp oh I am very familiar with the Airbus A400M. With a capacity of 81,600 pounds, the A400M most likely could transport the PULS rocket system. There are 10 countries that use the A400M, however the Netherlands are not one of them. The Netherlands do use the C-130 though. As I said earlier, each system was designed to meet the needs of their respective countries militaries. The U.S. Army has an expeditionary requirement for its rocket artillery systems. The Dutch Army does not.

[@wreckincrew2714]

1 primary and significant reason HIMARS is smaller and only carries 6 missiles is because you can put it in the back of a C130 fully armed, land the aircraft, roll the HIMARS out the back, fire all missiles, and be back on the C130 ready to take off in 5-10 min. Completely different purposes and reasons for the size and ammunition capacity. The Netherlands will never need to project power outside of its little European bubble since it continues relying on the US to save its ass when SHTF. So give Israel the credit it deserves but the 2 systems have different design purposes. Should've compared the US MLRS...... But it doesn't seem that the research for a proper comparative analysis was used in this video via the approach taken and statements made. Other than that good video.

[@bertnl530]

The choice was made on technical data, HIMARS is already pretty old. Another thing is that the system has an open architecture. The PULS missile are less expensive then the HIMARS. This gives the army better chances for continuing the battle, because they can buy more missiles for the same money. Another thing is that Denmark and Germany are also thinking about this system. This gives big advantages in interchangebility, maintenance, developing new projectiles and training. Why having three trainingcentra, when you can do it with one?

[@IsraelMilitaryChannel]

Puls is battled tested as well. Second Nagorno-Karabakh War

[@lovableulloriaqtomeetyu]

The world is much better without war weapons what do you think?

[@IsraelMilitaryChannel]

@@lovableulloriaqtomeetyu The world is much better with war weapons. "If you don't want war prepare for war". Powerful weapons deters neighbors from invading.

[@lovableulloriaqtomeetyu]

@@IsraelMilitaryChannel and neighbour have weapons too not only one side the world is full of greed pride and worst things is building of war weapons on the rise and greed of power on the rise. war in Ukraine on the rise till now no peace solution innocent people are suffering and loss of precious lives and illegal occupation others land on the rise civil war in part of the world on the rise. terrorisms on the rise and thanks to Russian forces US forces and Syrian troops they have defeated evil terrorists groups ISIS ISIL Al Qaeda etc and save Syria and Iraq.

[@avidan295]

@@IsraelMilitaryChannel Indeed!

[@Austin-cx2xe]

Battle proven, yeah right! For 1 month HAHA and you lost

[@RR-us2kp]

Puls is better than himars in every measurable way except one. Puls cannot be airlifted by a c130 size aircraft. So it loses badly in the mobility aspect. Won't be a problem for a defensive military. But not brilliant if the fight is not close to the logistics supply lines.

[@Austin-cx2xe]

Difference is one is barely being done developed, the other has been produced thousands of times and has been battle proven. To compare these two systems is dumb because they are used for completely different things, HIMARS main focus is mobility, something this doesn't have

[@RR-us2kp]

@@Austin-cx2xe both are fully developed and in service. Has been in service for years. And battle proven.

[@nikolavukota3969]

Welcome PULSE in Serbia!

[@IsraelMilitaryChannel]

This weapon is deadly

[@OlafKlaus-kx3kn]

lmao... *Fattah: Iran's hypersonic missile* can penetrate all Zionist missile defense system 😉

[@IsraelMilitaryChannel]

@@OlafKlaus-kx3kn Abdul, Iran is 50 years outdated.

[@yakov95000]

​@@OlafKlaus-kx3kn 😂😂😂

[@scottwolf8633]

@@OlafKlaus-kx3kn The mullahs should stop mounting quadrupeds, the Treponema pallidum organism is eating their very small brains.

[@kenoriose123]

@@IsraelMilitaryChannel 😂😂😂

[@aramisone7198]

We have many Mlrs but this is modern better missiles so i hope we buy a system.

[@saurabhdang7307]

Israel products are best + cheap .

[@waleedali9393]

Not at all

[@Chima4289]

Israel is famous for its brain power, so it develops state of the art weapon systems, but it lacks production capacities and capacities to produce these systems. That’s why Rafael, IMI, Elta and other Israeli Flagships establish partnerships with Raytheon, Reinmetal and other giants and license production of their systems to USA, Germany, India and other industries nations. For example, their famous Spike missile subsidiary in Germany is only 20% Israeli owned. The dominant80% is in German hands. The world most sophisticated Arrow-3 is 50% American…

[@jdogdarkness]

One thing he is missing is that HIMARS is the same thing as MLRS270, except with two pods. So it is more comparable to PULS when u consider that.

[@hossammohammed9239]

The martyr hero who cried Israel 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@WillMCarmo]

Can it be fired from the land to hit a moving warship ?

[@Wubbay828]

This is scary damn

[@WillMCarmo]

Does PULS ROCKET SYSTEM have anti-personel rockets ?

[@RuiseMuis]

Good question

[@aramisone7198]

I would by this system for my country but someone would say "we have many" But its Israeli so its better more modern ,better missiles combat proven. One system is not to ask too much.

[@2Sage-7Poets]

does it have an anti drone capability.. because if it is exposed to kamikaze drone then it's goodbye..

[@kealeradecal6091]

Your drones are weak against CIWS and lasers.

[@2Sage-7Poets]

@@kealeradecal6091 laser? 😭

[@gabrieljoseph6310]

This year a laser system to intercept iron beam missiles and UAV will be operational

[@Back2TheBike]

And no ITAR restrictions either nor American interference in your defence policy.

[@richiecabale3829]

Is pulse can hit moving object.coz himars can't

[@DerekHenry-nf8md]

This system is great compared to HIMARS and MLRS but its world known what the old MLRS and HIMARS did in Ukraine. US and Germany to colab on new HIMARS in the future.

[@arinternationalsas]

What's the difference between this and HIMARS??

[@RR-us2kp]

This is heavier and bigger. More firepower. Less mobility by smaller airlifters like c130.

[@B01]

​@@RR-us2kp makes sense since they don't need it to travel, just to hit back from near boarders where incoming fire came from

[@RR-us2kp]

@@B01 exactly. It works for Israel. It probably wouldn't work if the war is in a different continent like in the middle east or if the war is about attacking or defending islands like in the western Pacific. This'll be great for Ukraine probably. War is already inside their borders.

[@B01]

@@RR-us2kp I'd imagine they'd be keen on sending this a lot sooner than iron dome, since this is more offensive than defensive like Dome is. Not like Russia would gain much by capturing one of these systems, compared to iron dome which would be sold/traded to Iran first chance they got (I'm sure after they attempted to reverse engineered it themselves).

[@bertnl530]

About everything.

[@romstk7411]

if you have real psychologists why can't they judge the altar, isn't it not that hard to see if you accept the altar you will eventually accept the altair's way accepting condemning the innocent

[@mlleplle4570]

So if they shoot the rocket, let's say 183 miles behind the enemy lines, how are they supposed to know its effect on target?

[@royamano5482]

drone footage? plane footage? Satellite image? its 2023 man... not that hard

[@raygunreagan2274]

Bros still living in the 1700s

[@IsraelMilitaryChannel]

You literally asked a question which shows you in the video. Did you see how the missile hitting the building was captured?

[@B01]

Starlink was just tested on Starship successfully a few weeks ago. And this dude is like over a hundred miles away, no way can we see that 🤣

[@wreckincrew2714]

The same you found that "target"...... seriously dude!??

[@nmiljkovic]

It's not unique, what about Tamnava Yugoimport SDPR Serbia

[@josepulido6960]

Time to try out on Ukraine 🇺🇦

[@gabrieljoseph6310]

No way the Ukrainians will have Israeli weapons!! The murder of 1.6 million Jews by Ukrainians will not be forgiven or forgotten

[@waleedali9393]

A little advice don't don't please don't do that mistake

[@버들나무-c9z]

polska homar-k, korean k239 cheonmoo are simillar

[@mns4]

Good for israel not for every one😮

[@c.johnsmith6526]

The US should end aid to Israel. 1, Military Aid to Israel is unnecessary. Israel is a very prosperous country and more than capable of paying for its own military. 2.Military aid to Israel is a security risk to the United States. Israel has been selling American developed military technology to China for more than two decades. These sales have been instrumental in the modernization of China's military. 3.Military aid to Izrael is a diplomatic liability, 4, Military aid to Israel is illegal under American law. Israel's human rights violations disqualifies Israel from receiving military aid under the Leahy law and Israel's refusal to allow inspections of its nuclear sites or sign the nuclear non-proliferation treaty make any aid to Israel illegal under the Symington Amendment.

[@gabrieljoseph6310]

Not the first time I told you to stop lying. Israel cannot sell an Arrow 3 system to Germany because the US does not approve the US wants Germany to buy the American system which is of lower quality than the Arrow 3, any technology that Israel has developed together with the US Israel cannot sell without US leadership.The IMF estimated Israel's GDP at US$564 billion and its GDP per capita at US$58,270 in 2023 (13th highest in the world), a figure comparable to other highly developed countries. P.S Talk with Sleepy Joe about the assistance

[@dave-zh1xz]

I was about to start writting a full and detailed answer regarding every single concern u wrote, but then i saw the "human right violations" and i realized u are just a troll who knows nothing and i shouldn't be wasting my time 😂 keep on talking about things u know nothing about. I think ur mom had an affair while being pregnant with u, very ez to say things u know nothing about isn't it 😂

[@mrsd7k497]

הסיוע הצבאי הוא אינטרס אמריקאי מכוון שהנשק האמירקאי נמדד בקרב וחוסך הרבה שנים של מחקר ופיתוח הכל אינטרסים אין כאן מתנה של ארה״ב ברגע שהסיוע יפסק אין לארה״ב את המידע הזה וכמובן שאין לה טכנולוגיה ווטו על עסקאות מכיוון שהיא המממנת תלמד גאופוליטיקה !

[@Chima4289]

It is not as simple as it looks. Yes, Israel is in much better position to support it needs, and it can now do it without this assistance. From another hand, Israel is still a very small country that that lacks industrial capacities, so despite the fact that they sell a ton of weapon systems all around tbe world, the majority of the hardware is outsourced to other industrial nations like US, Germany, India… For over 8000 Spike missiles sold in Europe Israel got just 20% share, compare to 80% going to Reinmetals and other German giants. And don’t forget that these money could inly be spent in the United States at the very advantageous prices.., subsidizing the Military-Industrial complex. Although.., I agree…, this assistance program needs to be reviewed and optimized to the current realities.

[@Chima4289]

This assistance also allows US to put a check on to whom Israel is allowed to sell its weapons and technology

[@alexchong8024]

We choose Himars

[@kalfunai]

Nothing new here

[@IsraelMilitaryChannel]

Nothing new because you simply don't understand logistics and firepower. Puls has better firing rate because it can be equipped with more missiles. It's pods can be integrated on existing customers platforms.

[@NorbuWangmo-h6z]

HIMARS is a scam 😊

[@waleedali9393]

The newest peice of junk To my dearest Europeans sorry to telling you but you got pranked hahaha 🤣🤣😹😹😹

[@guyfox2369]

Amasing! This need for Ukraine!

[@goranastankovic9412]

SRBIJA KUPILA OVE IGRAČKE