Finally US Army Reveal New Chain Gun. Meet M230LF Chain Gun Check out to our science channel ► Brain Impact: / brainimpact
Пікірлер: 280
@rickc43176 ай бұрын
The Vulcan cannon certainly has an effective range of a lot more than "600 meters" as said at about 6:05 in the video.
@shenmisheshou70024 ай бұрын
Yes, effective range of a Vulcan is 3000 meters.
@nsrvtqc4 ай бұрын
2000 at best, you would have a tough time hitting a tank at 3000 without chasing and wasting a lot of ammo.
@shenmisheshou70024 ай бұрын
@@nsrvtqc 3000 Meters is for a stationary cannon. When the plane is moving at 400 knots, the forward motion of the aircraft adds another 600 FPS to the shell velocity and increases the effective range. Gun figures are always given stationary, but velocities are much higher when fired form the the moving jet. The F111 is thought to have killed 1500 armored vehicles and tanks during the gulf war using a 20mm canon.
@scotthodgins79754 ай бұрын
On paper, it's 'effective range' is 600m, however in reality, you are correct it is much much farther. They mean that they can hit a very specific target with more than 90% accuracy up to 600m. However when you are throwing up a literal wall of lead, it really doesn't matter if you can hit the bullseye at 3000m you are gonna do some serious damage even in you are 'close enough' to the target.
@bill59824 ай бұрын
@@shenmisheshou7002 F-111's never had a gun.
@davidkendall16144 ай бұрын
M230 IS a chain gun. Bushmaster IS a chain gun. M61 is a rotary cannon.
@dkoz8321Ай бұрын
You are comparing differential features. Chain gun means that its feed system is driven by chain, with firing pin mechanism timed with chain. The chain motor is electric, pneumatic, or hydralic depending on model. It has little to do with number of barrels. M61A1 Vulcan is Gatling type where the feed and action of the gun is driven by electric or pneumatic motor. Electric or pneumatic motor can also drive single barrel guns. This is case of European DEFA and Mauser BK cannons which are revolver cannons. Meaning that feed system loads rounds into revolver barrel, with gun being single barrel. Like a revolver handgun.
@davidkendall1614Ай бұрын
@@dkoz8321 Annnnnd your point is? I said “M230 IS a chain gun. Bushmaster IS a chain gun. M61 is a rotary cannon”. All true…no comparison of “differential features” at all. A simple statement, vs. the pic showing a rotary labeled as a chain gun. Yes, in a chain gun the action of the firearm is cycled by a chain driven by external power, typically an electric motor. While rotary guns can also use an external source of power to cycle the weapon's mechanism, they have multiple rotating barrels (unlike chain guns) and the necessary actions are performed by complex rotating cam mechanisms, not a chain. A chain gun has a single barrel. BK and DEFA are gas operated single barrel revolver cannons, not chain gun guns. Are you suggesting there is an in-service multi-barrel chain gun? When it comes to chain guns, the single barrel IS ubiquitous, and as such your statement “it has little to do with number of barrels” is incorrect…unless you can give an example. NOT from a video game…notorious for labeling non-chain guns, like Miniguns, as chain guns.
@christineshotton8244 ай бұрын
Two of the illustrations used for the M61 were actually GAU-8 variants; one in a Goalkeeper CIWS mount and the other was the main gun of an A-10.
@TheZoePath4 ай бұрын
100 bullets per second is insane!
@rocknessmonster25404 ай бұрын
You should hear a CWIS firing its insane!
@jakeg37334 ай бұрын
I think it's even more impressive that the radios they use can change frequencies 100 times per second. That's a lot easier to do with a (relatively) simple mechanical chaingun than with a sophisticated piece of electronics, that operates in a large network WITH heavy encryption, and has to do it flawlessly. Modern tech is sci-fi, it's crazy
@bradgilchrist-wy5gn4 ай бұрын
Yes, and in less than 2 minutes the gun can jam?
@jakeg37334 ай бұрын
@@bradgilchrist-wy5gn Statistics. It can jam, but it probably won't. Presumably if there is a malfunction there is also a way to clear it either automatically or manually (with human input). I'd say it's worth the risk for the absurd amount of lead it can spew in a short time, I grew up around firearms and all but one of them malfunctioned from time to time at the range
@user-fz2ul7wl2d19 күн бұрын
There is actually a system that can fire something like 1000 rounds a second or more. Electronic ignition, gunpowderless. Bullets.
@scottstewart57844 ай бұрын
Correction - towards the end you said General Dynamics bought Lockheed. That is not true, but Lockheed bought GD's aircraft division in 1992. Lockheed and GD each are top 5 US defense firms. Source - GD bought the company I worked for, and together competed against Lockheed all over the place.
@pableauxsporch75114 ай бұрын
rotary cannon, NOT a chain gun.
@dreamboards10564 ай бұрын
You sure? The vid shows 3 different systems. I see a chain gun.
@johncee8534 ай бұрын
Yeah, that's just the thumbnail. That's not what the vid is talking about. Kinda clickbaity...
@mondobigbongo4 ай бұрын
🤓
@btbd27854 ай бұрын
M230LF IS A CHAIN GUN!
@crazestyle834 ай бұрын
It's a chain gun for sure. It's a derivative of the Vulcan rotary cannon in the thumbnail. It's just 1 barrel from the Vulcan rotary cannon, that's where the confusion lies.
@FloridaManMatty4 ай бұрын
Yeah… The F-35 doesn’t have an M-61. The A variant has a 25mm GAU-22 cannon and the B and C variants (USMC & USN) both have to mount the gun in a pod as was shown around 6:30 in the video.
@Mullarkey14 ай бұрын
The Vulcan is so reliable it only jams 'once every 10,000 rounds'. It fires '6,000 rounds a minute'. So you can expect it to be jam free for at least 90 seconds😕
@StreetComp4 ай бұрын
Hahaha yeah Spotlight isn’t much for math 🙂 These sorts of videos are fun to watch I just don’t pay much attention to what they say
@mikeellis20254 ай бұрын
No one fires the Vulcan at full capability. I was on a Vulcan that was mounted on a m113 . During live fire exercises we pre set the weapon to fire 30 round bursts. You use it at full capacity you will burn up the barrals.
@StreetComp4 ай бұрын
@@mikeellis2025 well I’ve never fired one so I’ll take your word for it but I thought the point of this design was to avoid overheating so it can fire continuously - 30 rounds from this would be a tiny split second and there are videos of various models being fired for 5-10 seconds in a row
@mikeellis20254 ай бұрын
@@StreetComp I'm sure there have been upgrades since I fired it back in 1976- 1979.
@StreetComp4 ай бұрын
@@mikeellis2025 oh wow just after Vietnam. Thanks for your service at a time when US military morale was at its lowest point ever maybe. And yeah modern gatling style guns prob a little better now but I bet they still train soldiers to fire in short bursts
@nedkent52394 ай бұрын
Never ceases to amaze me how new US military tech makes it’s way to KZbin for the world to copy/clone. Not very strategic
@DavidJones-me7yr4 ай бұрын
I really appreciate that they make the m230 in a smaller version for smaller vehicles! I wish they would come out with a 30 caliber and call it m 230 a b g as in American big game!😊
@warrenlancaster2864 ай бұрын
I loved them all , are any available to be bought on line ?
@jakeg37334 ай бұрын
Stop dude 😂. What the hell you gonna do with that thing?
@robertlangley2584 ай бұрын
I think these weapons are marvelous, just keep improving.
@gregwoyton72364 ай бұрын
A strong military is a strong national deterrent.
@MH5XXXX4 ай бұрын
Speaking as a vet IM ALL FOR THE M61. THE CWIS is the best close attack gun. The Strykers with a chain gun is nice but a cwis system is better. The other weapons are nice too.
@ZonaJim4 ай бұрын
I built CIWS for 30 years.
@bumpedhishead6364 ай бұрын
Lockheed was NOT "bought by General Dynamics". In 1997, GD purchased two smaller business units of Lockheed Martin, the LM Defense Systems & LM Armament Systems. The total purchase was $450 million. This was a few years after GD sold the Fort Worth F-16 manufacturing to Lockheed, and then Lockheed & Martin Marietta merged to form Lockheed Martin. Today, both Lockheed Martin and General Dynamics Are $50 billion companies, with LM in air & space, and GD in land & sea...
@ytvitruviano4 ай бұрын
6000 rounds per minute and it jams only once every 10000 rounds ( every 1 minute and 40 seconds )
@garyurtiaga94264 ай бұрын
I think they meant every 100k rounds.
@Truex0074 ай бұрын
@@garyurtiaga9426 no, it's 10,000 rounds, that is one of the few things they got right. That said, an F/A-18 carries something like 1,000 rounds. Fire in bursts. The 10k is CONTINOUS FIRING failure rate.
@sheltr97354 ай бұрын
Ha! Yes, when you analyze what it means, it seems less impressive HOWEVER, it's still a HELLUVA MINUTE AND 39 SECONDS!! 🤓
@jakeg37334 ай бұрын
Damn. That they could stick it on a pickup truck, like a technical, is impressive. Less recoil means less intensive maintenance requirements for the vehicle and greater accuracy
@richardpayne32934 ай бұрын
Back in the 80's
@jakeg37334 ай бұрын
@@richardpayne3293 Ah, yes... The Chadians. Such Chads. Except if the Army wants to go that route, they'll need to come up with a turret mounting like 12 Javelin launchers and bolt that to a truck as well. It'd be hilarious unless you had to go up against it in a tank
@justyours87664 ай бұрын
A big thanks goes to chatgpt for the script 😅
@stevebass-rees47504 ай бұрын
I have just seen this program….I’m embarrassed as an Australian Citizen… My country has refused support to the USA in its request to supply a ship or ships in response to the Yemen’s attack in commercial shipping. The reason we couldn’t was we couldn’t defend our ships against drone attacks. Obviously there a system’s available. We have shirked our responsibility. As an Australian I apologise for our present Government’s behaviour. It is truly embarrassing.
@Amadman04 ай бұрын
Australia is doing what they think is in their best interests and nobody can blame them. Don’t be embarrassed. ❤ 🇦🇺 ❤🇺🇸 🤜🏻🤛🏻
@dane0phelps4 ай бұрын
Don’t be so harsh on your government. At least you guys don’t have to worry about your country being run by Donald Trump. Now that’s embarrassing. 😂
@warrenjones34084 ай бұрын
Our military is a joke
@Truex0074 ай бұрын
Hey, relax man, you guys got China to worry about, and you're rapidly improving. AUKUS was a big step.
@johncavanagh13924 ай бұрын
@@warrenjones3408maybe you should join up and help us out then
@user-gz1iv7mp2rАй бұрын
Now that is some serious fire power I’m talking salute 🫡
@carlruffier30924 ай бұрын
Only as good as its magazine size. With that said great weapon system.
@UnfilteredReality4204 ай бұрын
Nice Arms dealer sales video😁 Everything we show the public is antique!! They even retro fit it to fit cheaper trucks that Ukraine can afford, how accommodating.
@sebastienleblanc27084 ай бұрын
General dynamics... Turrets!
@drgonzo3056 ай бұрын
You left out the laser on the Shorad
@HanginInSF4 ай бұрын
Is there an OEM version for a 2021 Toyota Tacoma?
@Amadman04 ай бұрын
I’m sure it’s already in the works 😂
@NightwingP404 ай бұрын
I did not know the 35s have a Cannon. Yeeaa Buddy, Lets Go!
@madjag3 ай бұрын
Flippin' Dangerous.....enemies, be gone!
@richardprzybylek58474 ай бұрын
A-10 goes BBRRRRTTT
@Truex0074 ай бұрын
...thats not even close dude. The A-10 uses a GAU-8a avenger autocannon, and it fires slower than a vulcan... And stop saying that. The A-10 is shit. I love it, but it really is a terrible aircraft.
@richardprzybylek58474 ай бұрын
@@Truex007 I love the sound of the gun sorry personal favorite that's all it is
@BitBuhkit4 ай бұрын
@@Truex007 in your opinion, maybe. But the pilots and the ground forces it supports don't agree with you at all...
@Truex0074 ай бұрын
@@BitBuhkit It's not an opinion, it's a pretty verifiable fact. The A-10 has a higher loss rate than any other ground attack aircraft, and it's kill record isn't that high. The F-111 had more kills, lower losses, and flew in higher threat environments than the A-10 in the gulf war. The A-10 also has the highest amount of blue on blue incidents than any other aircraft in US history. That gun, a gun which has so much recoil it can cause the aircraft to stall if fired for too long, is also extremely inaccurate, as most high recoil guns are. And yes, there are plenty of service members who claim it's an amazing machine, which, honestly? Their right. Getting such a heavily armed aircraft into the air is actually quite an achievement. But talk to those who have actually had the aircraft called in for danger close missions. Quite a few high ranking officials have asked for other CAS aircraft in the gulf and war on terror, due to it's poor accuracy and general ineffectiveness. Honestly? I'd rather have an F-15E or AC-130 or AH-64 flying support. The A-10 can't even operate at night. It can fly at night, but that's about it.
@BitBuhkit4 ай бұрын
@@Truex007 "The A-10 is shit." That's you. I'll stick with the pilots and ground forces opinion.
@canufi6my4 ай бұрын
The M61 beats any drug out there!
@stephenwilliams18244 ай бұрын
Trials in Ukraine please.
@johnroof26633 ай бұрын
I just say total bad ass. I don't believe these are highly expensive modifications, just improving on an old design.
@christopherbova81094 ай бұрын
Glad we have them
@ericb.43586 ай бұрын
The ultimate vehicle mounted machine gun.
@ApplyWithCaution4 ай бұрын
... the turret mounted weaponry seems very vulnerable to enemy fire ...
@atomicbill4 ай бұрын
Have you got one that fits on a Prius ?
@johncee8534 ай бұрын
Look this up...prius with m61.
@ryanward80394 ай бұрын
No amount of military hardware will even make a Prius cool.
@oceanmariner4 ай бұрын
The Browning M1917 fired 20,000 continuous rounds on acceptance trials without a jam.
@rogerodle87504 ай бұрын
M230LF -- When you want the very best in home defense.
@caink91424 ай бұрын
Yemen / Iran here we come
@gregoryhopper35144 ай бұрын
Lockheed was bought by General Dynamics?
@JS-fe8sx4 ай бұрын
It was incorrect. Lockheed Martin has purchased a couple o divisions of General Dynamics giving Lockheed their Space and Tactical Aircraft business.
@lizzardwizard20004 ай бұрын
Wow that is news to me…. sarc
@joewoodchuck382419 күн бұрын
Why two barrel lengths? Does ~6" difference really matter?
@richardpayne32934 ай бұрын
I was on a M163 A-D-A gun. Mounted on a M-113. One he'll of a gun. To bad they never show you the damage it does. It pokes holes the size of quarters in wheeled vehicles.
@mikeellis20254 ай бұрын
I to served on the Vulcan. People cannot even fathom the fire power. Absolutely loved going to Todendorf for live fire exercises. In the three times I went only experienced 1 jam in 15 days of firing.
@jannejohansson33833 ай бұрын
False Bigger false Statistics
@mikeellis20253 ай бұрын
@jannejohansson3383 what is false?
@indychoate83504 ай бұрын
Awesome!
@yourmom96086 ай бұрын
Can change the shape of any expedition
@alenkerr85333 ай бұрын
Being British thank god they our allies imagine being on the other side freighting
@maddog45auto664 ай бұрын
freaking awesome.
@cjespers3 ай бұрын
Love the pickup with gun mounted in the bed. Road rage??
@schlaznger80492 ай бұрын
Fires 6000 per minute, jams every 10,000 rounds. Sit it malfunctions once every 1.6 minutes
@theguywithone4 ай бұрын
It's great and all, but US forces need permission to fire just about anything unless they're taking fire from hostile forces/troops. Don't train soldiers and give them weapons and then require they have authorization to use them. The enemy doesn't care. It seems we care too much. Don't want to offend anyone. Ugh. God Bless all service members and you're all in my prayers for a safe return from wherever duty takes you. 🇺🇸
@nunyafb14403 ай бұрын
If you're going to describe a object, give it in standard also.
@angelmarcano67474 ай бұрын
Crazy.!!!👍😬
@Stonewall195414 ай бұрын
why on earth would America reveal our best artillary and weapons on You Tube?
@jannejohansson33833 ай бұрын
What a joke..
@stephentebbutt71614 ай бұрын
Awesome, unless you're on the receiving end.
@rhinehardt13 ай бұрын
Will the M230LF fit in the bed of my Ford Ranger?
@blankeny6 ай бұрын
New, hell this technology is most likely 80 years old! The rotory cannon was invented in 1946... Sure the calibre has changed and feeding/ ejection. But it's still the same gun...
@phiddler14 ай бұрын
Gatlin gun
@jakeg37334 ай бұрын
And rifles go back centuries. Still work, though
@davidferrara11053 ай бұрын
Will there be a handheld version available for fighting aliens to an old tape of "Long Tall Sally"?
@x13xmonkey4 ай бұрын
Just to be clear the STRYKER is Canadian.
@carmium4 ай бұрын
Stryker AFV: Made in Canada for the US ARMY!
@Rhythm9114 ай бұрын
Now the M23- 0LF, (OLAF) That's something that makes sense (Ex-Navy), and it looks like something that they would use on their spaceships in the sci-fi TV show "The Expanse" !! 🤣🤣🤣
@mjnyc86554 ай бұрын
Does the public want to know how much each round costs?
@Kefoo_4 ай бұрын
-- ". . . which most ammunition is packaged with."
@markthompson65404 ай бұрын
Still waiting for the USA to supply it's citizens with decent health care and stop families sleeping rough. But no just this shit
@jannejohansson33833 ай бұрын
Not going to happen without Trump and even less with him. Just paradox whole system if fitted in country like US. If it works, million sick people's jump in. Every day!
@BrokenandRestored4 ай бұрын
I live in Los Angeles County. Will the M230LF fit on my Mustang? Jusk askin...
@petert33554 ай бұрын
Nah, it will fit on ya F150 though.
@jannejohansson33833 ай бұрын
AHAHHHAA x)
@BrokenandRestored3 ай бұрын
LoL. Love it!
@ChipEstrada4 ай бұрын
That last video was of a GAU-8 from an A-10. That was not mentioned in this video. I hate it when you use the wrong stock footage.
@josephpacchetti59974 ай бұрын
I Like All. 👊 😎 🇺🇸 Of Them, You Don't Mess With The U.S. 💪
@richardanderson-ze3sk4 ай бұрын
Now, where are the soldiers?
@williamburroughs96864 ай бұрын
I like these weapons, pointed away from me. ;)
@imafarmer63534 ай бұрын
Wouldn’t want to be on receiving end.
@MakeSomeNoiseAgencyPlaylists4 ай бұрын
it was designed and planned back in 1972
@zeuqramjj20024 ай бұрын
The Jackal gun much!
@braamvorster82494 ай бұрын
One very formidable gun this one
@garrettbrown11304 ай бұрын
Merica!!!❤
@chrish26854 ай бұрын
At 7:43, I can honestly state I have never seen a Terrorist on a Jet Ski in the Desert !
@richardschipper59894 ай бұрын
🤡 Red Sea ring a bell?
@Ja-rl1tqАй бұрын
Great! More high tech military equipment to be left behind in future Afghanistan!
@stevejeffryes50864 ай бұрын
Lockheed bought by General Dynamics? I don' think so!
@jimb40904 ай бұрын
LM bought GD..not the other way round.
@bill59824 ай бұрын
Lots of errors in this video particularly in the Vulcan section
@user-gf5wu4pq4y4 ай бұрын
I love my country
@markbrownless16794 ай бұрын
you said that the Vulcan cannon fires 1000 rounds a minute ...and it only breaks down after ten thousand rounds ..that means that it breaks down every ten minutes ..thats toilet ...lol
@senecaknowsbest83804 ай бұрын
How many of these were left behind in Afghanistan?
@AWOL19694 ай бұрын
Wait what? high reliability only jam or fail once every 10,000 rounds while it fires 6000 rounds per minute. So it only jams or fails once every 90 seconds. I feel like thats not that great.
@DS759214 ай бұрын
They are very cool everyone should have at least one.
@mauricegold93774 ай бұрын
Open carry?
@johnkulus78124 ай бұрын
Howcan I get one for home defense? Er ..... deer hunting
@lizzardwizard20004 ай бұрын
MOOG INC. is pronounced mowg, like mow the lawn.
@GlenCychosz4 ай бұрын
Finally? Are you clickbait or something?
@sonnypruitt66394 ай бұрын
Time to restart the draft.
@Justnobody09503 ай бұрын
I truly thank our military and these industries that keep upgrading our wespon system on behalf of our security. Now, all we need is a Commander in Chife who doesn't have dementia!!! Guess that's why I just saw an article about why Putin in Russia wants Biden back in office instead of Trump!😮
@robertalan24274 ай бұрын
Hard to hide from all this...dig deep and keep ur friggen head down
@johnouzounidis77612 ай бұрын
there all overkill any ammo that hits its target will vaporize .....
@jackli04416 ай бұрын
What BGM were your used?
@davidmurphy81904 ай бұрын
The BGM-114 HELLFIRE.
@ronaldwhite17304 ай бұрын
Thank - you . ( 2024 / Jan / 13 )
@AishaShaw-cl6wc4 ай бұрын
You mean it jambs.?
@blidge82824 ай бұрын
Just remember that it's the Democrats that don't want you to be able to carry these for self defence when you walk down the street
@user-hs9br8zd1i4 ай бұрын
Still not won a war for a bit tho eh!!
@walnutkraken94304 ай бұрын
40 year old tech….
@YaRememberTHISQuestionmark4 ай бұрын
Can this become a cheaper solution to combat drone/missile threats from the houthis?
@gdunn0134 ай бұрын
Just wondering if Joe Biden had given these systems to Iran yet?
@sheltr97354 ай бұрын
3:53 "M-SHORAD (Maneuver Short Range Air Defense) will also offer protection against artillery rockets and mortars. It's also being in introduced to combat Regional ballistic missile threats such as Patriot and the terminal high altitude area defense system" Ummmmm...WHAT?!?!?! Too many mistakes in the video to abide Sorry, no sub happening No like happening No thanks!
@jerryarcher19234 ай бұрын
I want one of each
@tomhenkel43284 ай бұрын
Two questions: How much and where can I get one?
@rdbchase5 ай бұрын
How does Patriot represent a regional ballistic missile threat?
@jasonswearingin10094 ай бұрын
Agreed. Patriot is a US/NATO Ballistic missile defense system brought to public knowledge during the Gulf War. I bet the video creator sourced their info from their sponsor World of Tanks or War Thunder LMFAO!