The coefficient of determination can help us report the explained and unexplained variation of the dependent variable.
Пікірлер: 139
@FratBoyFitness3 жыл бұрын
I wish I had a teacher like you lol 😅 why is KZbin the best teacher
@connorforde423610 жыл бұрын
Thank you, straight and to the point. Great lesson.
@michellemarin32374 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this very simple explanation! With a now online statistics course, your video was extremely helpful.
@rvcmathprof4 жыл бұрын
So glad it helped!
@crimnvL8 жыл бұрын
thanks homie
@mayito33346 жыл бұрын
lol
@ShreyaPednekar1920 күн бұрын
This is the clearest explanation ever! Thank you!
@sontagfamily56114 жыл бұрын
I read untold articles including my text book and you explained in within 2 minutes and 47 seconds.
@rvcmathprof4 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your feedback! Glad it helped.
@rhaltunen8 жыл бұрын
Thank you! Someone finally made sense of this!
@ccunni38124 жыл бұрын
Very good explanation.
@rvcmathprof4 жыл бұрын
Thank you, glad you found it helpful.
@laterwell Жыл бұрын
You are a very good teacher, madam. A lot of Respect here
@justnavarrothings96504 жыл бұрын
Is this the same? 90% of the variations in the number of sick days incurred (y) is attributed to the variations in age (x). Thank you.
@rvcmathprof4 жыл бұрын
Yes, yours is an application of the concept
@JacksonNigel7 ай бұрын
Perfectly done,.11yrs now.Still using her knowledge 😊🎉
@alinazia72474 жыл бұрын
Thankyou soo much it was really helpful...
@rvcmathprof4 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the positive feedback!
@adrienne2208 жыл бұрын
Aw my God, I trailed through article after article after article of stuffy old lecturers basically debating whether it was good to use the correlation of determination or not and I found this video and within two minutes I learned how to report it the way I wanted to. THANK YOU!
@WitnessBengo2 ай бұрын
I got a question. If the R as a correlation helps to find us R^2 which is the square of R. Does that mean to avoid memorizing the longest formula of coefficient correlation we can just apply the direct given formula of R^2 as SSR/SST Where SSR Is the total square sum of regression and SST is the square sum of residuals and then square root the results to find R?
@42luke93 Жыл бұрын
Thank you. I'm in a data analytics class and the teacher used Data Analysis tool to get R and R^2 but did not go into the meaning of the two variables. But why do we have R and R^2 , what does R mean on its own?
@42luke93 Жыл бұрын
In Excel
@luketannian75035 жыл бұрын
Great video ! But how do you calculate r if you don't have it ?
@sarapearson44617 жыл бұрын
Such a helpful video. Thank you for explaining in a very simple manner that is easy to understand!
@gyaneshkoiry79922 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the explanation..... It is straight forward and It helped me a lot
@Timeofsuccess4 жыл бұрын
Is Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) used in the context of linear regression to drive R^2.
@daltonmiller55903 жыл бұрын
Thanks. I was looking for a video on the interpretation of the wording of coefficient of determination. Variation of Y is explained by X. Got it.
@osirisespinoza54874 жыл бұрын
hi very helpful but what would happen if my r is a negative? will I still do the same process
@arifjahanshanto31572 жыл бұрын
simple and precise... Thanks a lot for the lesson ❤️
@beckya69209 жыл бұрын
simple and great explanation. Helpful.
@salmankhan-lr3yt5 жыл бұрын
Wow crystal clear explanation
@mirriamkoim14933 жыл бұрын
very clear and simple i wish you are my teacher
@ldpy334 жыл бұрын
So, they both tell us how strong the relationship is between two variables?!
@grandlong54624 жыл бұрын
Great lesson! Thank you.
@rvcmathprof4 жыл бұрын
My pleasure!
@khan-hg6em8 жыл бұрын
Can I find the other to calculate. The longer one. As the regression equation we have calculated and from there we calculate the coefficient of determination..
@clarissagarza8 Жыл бұрын
This is so helpful thank you so much!
@Keislaforex3 жыл бұрын
Wow am in love with your simple calculation
@tabby53583 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much! I find this really helpful.
@ianfrasermobile6 жыл бұрын
A big thank you from South Africa!
@amirahizzati71725 жыл бұрын
THANK YOU SO MUCH, YOU HELP ME ALOT FOR MY PRESENTATION.
@jatrana110 жыл бұрын
teacher is it the value of R-sequared is same as the value of coefficient of determination?
@maeregegebrehewotgebremedh51585 жыл бұрын
please madam i have one question....when i work my research paper on multiple regression my adjusted R square is become only 0.032 meaning only 3 percent of the variance in dependent variable is explained by my independent variables right??..so is it possible only 3 percent variance?..if not how can increase Adjusted R square??
@yeny71947 жыл бұрын
omg, I love you. Thank you for this video. It helped me answer a question from my HW and my professor was impressed. LOL
@major_lazer12694 жыл бұрын
If it’s not significant, do we do the coefficient of determination?
@noranshams4469 жыл бұрын
Amazing explanation. All your videos are very helpful. Thank you so much.
@knosis5 жыл бұрын
Straight to the point. Awesome video
@mitch18848 жыл бұрын
how do you work out r. not very good
@jayaseto6 жыл бұрын
Curious George Thanks a lot
@MontyCantsin2 жыл бұрын
Here's my attempt to explain the point that I think is missing (namely why the coefficient of determination is a percentage of the variation, why that is "explained by X", and why anyone bothers to square r). Without losing anything, you can assume X and Y have a mean of zero. Then the variation of Y can be thought of as the square of the length of a vector pointing in the direction of Y, which in turn is the hypotenuse of a right triangle formed by two vectors: one pointing in the direction of X, and and one orthogonal to it. (Direction and magnitude are with respect to the inner product induced by the probability measure.) The correlation is extracting the cosine of the "angle" between X and Y. The cosine, in turn, is equal to the length of the leg pointing in the direction of X divided by the length of the hypotenuse, which is the standard deviation of Y. The square of the standard deviation is the variation, which is equal to the sum of the squares of the length of the legs. Dividing these two squares of the lengths of the legs by the square of the length of the hypotenuse (the variation) shows you what proportion each contributes to the variation: one contribution from a vector pointing in the direction of x, and one from the remainder. A percentage makes sense with this understanding.
@popemartinfrankenstein73017 жыл бұрын
Thank you for explaining the interpretation so well :)
@LeMale967 жыл бұрын
Wonderfully and simply explained, Thank You so much
@miltonmbewe41054 жыл бұрын
Very helpful thanks
@rvcmathprof4 жыл бұрын
So glad it helped
@olgacsolgaolga32798 жыл бұрын
in the end is r once squared =0.94^2, and then once again =(0.94^2)^2? so we get (r^2)^2?
@NemShrestha8 жыл бұрын
+OlgaCS olgaolga Nah !!! Just multiplying by 100 to get in percentage
@mwishakamoses24462 жыл бұрын
why is coefficient of determination a square of correlation coefficient?
@justinsantiago48619 жыл бұрын
Thanks this helped a lot to study for my final! :D
@anshumanbiswal22253 жыл бұрын
Why do we say that it(coeff of determination) is a measure of how much of the variation in y is predicted by the variation in x? The two variables are just correlated. By saying this, we are imposing a causal relationship between the two. AHHHH...This is so vexing. Can you or anyone please clarify this doubt?? Thanks...
@rvcmathprof3 жыл бұрын
The coefficient of determination is just saying how strong the correlation between the explanatory and response variable is, not that one causes the other. The variation in y can be predicted by the variation in x without x causing y..
@anshumanbiswal22253 жыл бұрын
@@rvcmathprof Thanks Diane...I am more clear about it now.
@josep42595 жыл бұрын
does Having a higher percentage mean the model is a good fit?
@rvcmathprof5 жыл бұрын
yes, the closer r^2 is to 1 (or 100%) the better the fit
@amyemerson23827 жыл бұрын
Perfect explanation; thank you!
@gutsikanaimatanhire16364 жыл бұрын
thanks very much!
@rvcmathprof4 жыл бұрын
I appreciate your feedback!
@suryanshverma4155Ай бұрын
❤❤❤❤thank you maam 🌺🌹🌹🌺🎇🌱 Indian 🇨🇮🇨🇮🇨🇮
@iceking068711 жыл бұрын
Thank you, this is a great explanation.
@adnanjamil94292 жыл бұрын
Great explanation
@voidcat68762 жыл бұрын
fantastic explanation!
@rvcmathprof Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much!
@daviddibble9588 жыл бұрын
so does rxy = r squared?
@juliussumaling14442 жыл бұрын
thank you. you explained it well..
@rvcmathprof2 жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@alllisun52984 жыл бұрын
How could I find the least squares regression line of the coefficient of determination !?!? This makes me so frustrated
@Nicety19 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this more simple explanation.
@egggoffy96139 жыл бұрын
You are AMAZING!!!!!! Thank you!!!
@heathersmith62465 жыл бұрын
Okay but how do you get r????!!!!!! It's not in your last video like you said
@TheNewKhahGaming10 жыл бұрын
wow learned so much in 3 mins.
@aowens919210 жыл бұрын
Wow! That certainly cleared it up for me! THANK YOU! So subscribing to your channel.
@heavydremer87162 жыл бұрын
thanks this helped alot!
@rvcmathprof2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the positive feedback! Glad it helped!
@Chthonian1214 жыл бұрын
Literally I'm watching videos of people making graphs means of y minus means of x and all this nonsense I can't understand where all you had to do was square r for the answer.. thank you..
@rvcmathprof4 жыл бұрын
Glad the video was helpful
@chamitharathnayake48654 жыл бұрын
Thank you ma'am.💟
@rvcmathprof4 жыл бұрын
I am so glad it helped
@chamitharathnayake48654 жыл бұрын
@@rvcmathprof Obviuosly that helped so much.
@uchindamihara4744 Жыл бұрын
You are good👍
@rvcmathprof Жыл бұрын
Thanks 😁
@shahvei12 жыл бұрын
Thank you soo much!! You really helped me.
@anatwin55858 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this explanation
@randomnotes42582 жыл бұрын
The sensation of watching this video fills you with *DETERMINATION* *file saved
@rvcmathprof Жыл бұрын
Love the pun!!
@bellejenkins54314 ай бұрын
Thank you so much!
@Folaganga11 жыл бұрын
But what do you mean by "explained" and unexplained"?