The important thing is the logic behind the formula/procedure. I just don’t understand why math teachers kept on demonstrating the solution to a problem without explaining the logic behind. I suspect they don’t understand too.
@mrhtutoring21 күн бұрын
Give me 60 minutes. I'll explain it so that even an elementary school student would understand why. It's a tough squeeze just to mention the formula for KZbin shorts.
@suthan200314 күн бұрын
He definitely knows it. But sometimes it is sufficient to just know the formula. Example I don't need to know how Engine of the car works but as long as I can drive I am fine
@mariosantos20314 күн бұрын
@@suthan2003 if the purpose of maths in school is to train the mind it certainly a must to understand the logic behind the formula.
@anonymoushere778614 күн бұрын
@@mariosantos203derivation for every formula is not needed imo
@TikeMyson6913 күн бұрын
@mariosantos203 You might've not noticed but this is KZbin, not school.
@anestismoutafidis4575Ай бұрын
Thank you for showing the Heron's method. At first , I calculated the area of the triangle by calculating the height of it (a•sinβ) and then by the modificated formula for calculating the area of the dragon figure ( A= 1/2 •e•f)÷2 9,8m^2. It took a relativ long time, of course. I am grateful to know now about the Heron's formula.
@Nino-eo8eyАй бұрын
where'd you get the angle from
@yesssssshАй бұрын
@@Nino-eo8eyBro you don't get sarcasm do you?
@Nino-eo8eyАй бұрын
@@yessssssh You can't blame me, thought he actually measured the angle by himself when he said "took a long time, of course".
@anthonylawrence326525 күн бұрын
That is absolutely brilliant, I don’t know why it never occurred to me to perform the operation in this manner.
@alexandrevaliquette388326 күн бұрын
Meanwhile, some flat earthers struggle with basic math to figure out the shape of earth!
@Mustafa_Shahzad16 күн бұрын
Blud what This is pure maths, that would be a specific example of a certain specific field of applied maths. Like I think your comment was a bit of a stretch. Flat earthers can definitely be good at mathematics aswell.
@alexandrevaliquette388315 күн бұрын
@@Mustafa_Shahzad Most (if not all) of them cannot calculate basic stuff. For example, they cannot calculate the distance between two point on a sphere (regardless if it's earth or a sphere draw on a board).
@seventhunder777Ай бұрын
Where was Heron when I was in school?
@NinjaBear199327 күн бұрын
It is trigonometry/ pre calculus. I learned it in trigonometry in college. I was a sophomore in high school when I took it.
@GlavnyiGitarist24 күн бұрын
Wow. We were learned Heron in 8th or 9th grade
@maxpie1620 күн бұрын
@@GlavnyiGitaristsame
@taimurahmad18 күн бұрын
I learned it in grade 7
@nstarling88Ай бұрын
As a math teacher I forgot this😔.
@LiquidRRАй бұрын
Me too!
@johnplong3644Ай бұрын
You just made me feel better I totally forgot this I tutored kids in basic math up to Algebra 2
@dilaudid1Күн бұрын
Wikipedia explains it's derivation. You can figure it out using the Pythagorean theorem making this triangle into two right triangles, with the shared side = x, and the 7 meter sides = y and 7-y, etc etc. Its an elegant formula from thousands of years ago.
@ieo844626 күн бұрын
This seems awfully useful for something that's not taught in schools
@Verziroo21 күн бұрын
I guess because working out the area of a triangle using 1/2•bh or 1/2•ab•sinC (when height is unknown) is more applicable to other branches of maths whereas this doesn’t really carry over to any other branch. Also more time-consuming than any of the two mentioned. Still nice to know though
@mrydobon4 күн бұрын
It's also not applicable to all triangles. The sum of any two side lengths must be greater than the third side length
@cmk44896 күн бұрын
Literally used this two days ago in an exercise in numerical mathematics! The task was to program the triangulation of a circle to compute its Area
@xdragon2k21 күн бұрын
I just noticed that for a three-sided polygon to be called a triangle, the sum of it shortest sides need to be more than the longest side. It can never be smaller than. And if they are equal, it's just a straight line.
@oc1anking95619 күн бұрын
no offense but thats kinda basic- a person who couldn't talk properly until 7
@xdragon2k19 күн бұрын
@@oc1anking956 I know it's basic. It's just something you don't think about. That is until they show you this formula. S = the sum of all sides divided by 2. Then you multiply S with S minus each sides. On the straight line case where a = b + c, s - a will equal zero. A straight line has no area.
@oc1anking95619 күн бұрын
@@xdragon2k ahhhh I agree on u with this one
@mikaeloverfjord904726 күн бұрын
Deriving the formula yourself you will see how elegant this formula is. (You will have to know the Area Formula A=ab*sin(C)/2 and the trigonometric identity sin(x)^2 + cos(x)^2 = 1 and the Law of Cosines cos(C)=(c^2-a^2-b^2)/(-2ab) )
@DamplyDooАй бұрын
I actually was the one who told this to Heron. Bro took credit
@wolemaiКүн бұрын
That is one weird formula! Later you may want to show how they derived that formula - not now, I don't have the time!
@ernestobie-wm1eiАй бұрын
Thank you prof. You are the best 👌
@jpc70000Ай бұрын
Thank so much
@loridave1962Ай бұрын
Wow. I need to think this thru to see if it should be intuitive. Way cool.
@Omnipotent_ScienceАй бұрын
W heron let us do simple arithmetic 😎
@Power101808 күн бұрын
I think Heron's formula is the best expression in geometry
@420sakura1Ай бұрын
Root of 96. 100 is Close to 96. Sqrt of 100 is 10. 10 - (100-96)/(3*10) 10-0.2=9.8 Sqrt of (96) it's 9.7979
@junesantos54328 күн бұрын
I'm confused too!.. square root of 96 arrived at 4 sqrt of 6?
@junesantos54328 күн бұрын
Now I knew, simplifying radicals.. sqrt of 16 X sqrt of 6 = 4 x sqrt of 6
@sachinbarvekar256322 күн бұрын
4/20 (100-96) (10*2)
@fubaralakbar6800Ай бұрын
What if you inscribe this triangle into a rectangle, compute the area of the rectangle, compute the area of the two right triangles outside the non-right triangle, and then subtract? Ah, but I suppose you can't do that without knowing the height of the triangle, which is impossible to compute with the information given.
@carultchАй бұрын
It's not impossible to compute with the given information, it's just requires a detour from algebraic operations. The solution ends up being an algebraic function after all, since it is a composition of sine and inverse cosine. Let A be the angle opposite the 5-meter side From the law of cosines: 5^2 = 4^2 + 7^2 - 2*4*7*cos(A) Solve for cos(A): cos(A) = (25-16-49)/(-56) = 5/7 The height h will equal 4*sin(A). Use the identity, sin(arccos(A)) = sqrt(1 - A^2) to compute it. h = 4*sqrt(1 - (5/7)^2) Thus, the area of the triangle is 7*h/2, which is: Area = 14*sqrt(1 - (5/7)^2) = 4*sqrt(6) Area = 9.8 m^2
@Mustafa-oy7lyАй бұрын
You could also do cosine rule to find one angle then you could do 1/2 ab sin (c)
@hassankazimaziz6402Ай бұрын
Hi sir , what kind of projector that you are using? Thanks for these incredible videos
@mohammadchaudhry472825 күн бұрын
Itis the shortest way of solution and really very smart way of solution. Of course my mathematical knowledge is very very old since 1969,but if we calculate the attitude of this triangle we can calculate the area of the triangle. Altitude multiplied by base of the triangle ( here it is 7 m) divided by 2 . But the gentleman man has suggested is the shortest method of solution.
@evinos931017 күн бұрын
we in india learn this formula in 9th grade ie when we are 14
@Aerospace202X25 күн бұрын
I still remember my old school math classroom❤❤
@bradellis-cole4845Ай бұрын
Nice
@andersongomez63621 күн бұрын
Knowing this is cool …prove this is the way!
@lawrencelawsen6824Ай бұрын
This guy is god I just subscribed to him
@stroescualexandru851415 күн бұрын
It is known as the formula of Heron
@joseacosta135424 күн бұрын
And he retained the units.
@Snownam22729 күн бұрын
how can a formula so simple that 90% get it wrong
@JeevanPradhanG17 күн бұрын
My question why divide always with 2 wanted to know the reason for it
@user-iv3in2ou3p4 күн бұрын
It feels almost like cheating... Ahahaha. That is education is.
@pixonicpredator21 күн бұрын
Can someone please help me understand the logic behind this formula?
@karcha5Ай бұрын
Thanks Brahmagupta. He was the one who discovered "Heron's Formula"
@kaeezАй бұрын
Don't care, I'll still call it Heron's Formula.
@karcha5Ай бұрын
@@kaeez Read "The Imperishable Seed". Well, if not you at least others who "care" will read.
@kaeezАй бұрын
@@karcha5 Dude, there is no such thing as an "inventor" in Mathematics. There is nothing to be "invented" here. Mathematics is us humans trying to make sense of things already present in the universe. Patterns, repeated occurrences etc. Same with all other sciences. Especially in the case of Mathematics, fighting over who invented something is absurd cause if not them, someone else will one day. It's omni-present, you just have to figure it out. Brahmagupta might have figured this out earlier but it was Heron's publications that were popularized and made mainstream. You can't say Heron copied it off Brahmagupta cause it's not like these patterns were only revealed to Brahmagupta by some extraterrestrial species or God if you allow it, if not him, you could've also discovered it. So really this argument is just irrelevant.
@karcha5Ай бұрын
In fact Brahmagupta gave a generalization to cyclic quadrilateral (if one of the sides is substituted as zero it's a triangle and his formula then reduces to Heron's Formula). Thus the reading I recommended is perfectly relevant. If you want go read and find that formula, or discover it yourself.
@kk121819 күн бұрын
Isosceles triangle!!
@arqmark27 күн бұрын
Don't give us the formula, give us the deduction to get the formula.
God I totally forgot this yes I definitely need to take trig again it has be 45 years
@artemirrlazaris740624 күн бұрын
How did Heron find out this method? What relation of ratio did she realise, Its divded by 2... I haven't checked the answer, but 360 degrees, is it assuming its a square when adding them together. Typically geometry gives you a formula that hten you cna plug in. One triangle thing is 4 times 5 = 20.. so we know the area, will be less than 10... its the hypotenuse that is acting as a modifier causing it to be a non right triangle... Does this work for obtuse only? or narrow isoceles... hmm.. curious on the proof for it.
@notayush206427 күн бұрын
Heron is the truehero
@dan_the_man440111 күн бұрын
Would like a proof
@Mecal2118 күн бұрын
Why can't you just do 1/2bh?
@kiburamaha7715Ай бұрын
Thank you sir! 🙏 One question? Is there a derivation or a proof for the heron's formula?
@bashersinc.1715Ай бұрын
yes it is a long process...start by the right triangle
@mohammadhuzaifkhan782829 күн бұрын
How to derive it
@godstiniestlover801Ай бұрын
Hello sir, is that the method derived from the x-y axis ?
@ThatGithubGuyАй бұрын
I thought that was only for triangles whose points lie on a circle?
@rivenoakАй бұрын
all triangles work on a certain circle. perhaps not so ancient wisdom as Heron of Alexandria's formula here but old knowledge still for construction of such a circle a look at wikipedia will suffice :D en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcircle
@KnowYourself06Ай бұрын
I am having the same doubt. This was taught with drawing a circle touching all points on the triangle.
@ThatGithubGuyАй бұрын
@@rivenoak Uhh, not all triangles fall in a circle. For example, no isosceles triangle would ever fall on a circle, as it would have to be an ellipse to fall on it. the 7m divided by 2 must be equal to the height, thus the height, if this was true, would be 3.5? I'm not sure if that triangle would fall on a circle.
@whoff59Ай бұрын
Thinking a triangle and whether all 3 points are on a circle: Each of these 3 points must be equidistant to some point in the centre of the circle. This distance is called the radius. You can draw a line between 2 points and cut it in the midst by another line rectangular to it. Every 3rd point which is also equidistant to those 2 points must be found on that line. You can easily find 3rd points which are not on that line. So you are right: there are triangles which do not fulfil the requirement.
@rivenoakАй бұрын
@@ThatGithubGuy naaah, consult the link above; it will work out just fine :D
@Kamabushi999Ай бұрын
Not done yet The answer has to be in m^2 To be in anyway useful 9.8 m^2 4xSR of 96 is 9.8 m^2
@yasaissogood19 күн бұрын
I don’t understand last part where he simplify it How did he get 4 square root of 6m squared I never seen this in grade seven
@nabelalifxiiak456514 күн бұрын
√96 = √16x6 = 4√6
@Hardiarm25 күн бұрын
Why would you simplify SQRT 96 as 4*SQRT6?
@mrhtutoring25 күн бұрын
Most teachers want it like that.
@adrianpaligar202625 күн бұрын
What happened to you FB page?
@leewmleeАй бұрын
This is new to me! THKS!
@mineshukri3444Ай бұрын
Never understood this never wll
@JezzBowden26 күн бұрын
How did he get 4root6 from root 96? I know it’s the same answer. I can use a calculator lol. But how do you make that conversion?
@mrhtutoring26 күн бұрын
√96 = √16×6 = √16 x √6 = 4√6
@JezzBowden26 күн бұрын
@@mrhtutoring Ah, I see. So any simplification will do I guess. Whatever makes it easier to calculate. Because 96 can be broken down in many ways!
@aroshneupane246223 күн бұрын
Many people are saying they didn't learn this at school but i actually learned it at class 9th.is it really not taught.
@gamtax25 күн бұрын
Any reason why Pythagoras' Theorem overrated compared to this?
@elmersbalm521918 күн бұрын
Pythagoras can be used to derive a proof. Now I half remember that one, after checking Wikipedia.
@jakegibson718Ай бұрын
Hi, how would you solve the equation a(x-b)(x-8) Vertex point is 2,-54 and graphed on XY plane find a+b I couldn’t figure out this for the life of me
@carultchАй бұрын
Given: a*(x - b)*(x - 8) Vertex: (2, -54) For parabolas in general, the vertex's x-position is average of the two x-intercepts. This isn't true for polynomials in general, but for parabolas is is. This means that the average of b & 8 is +2. We can determine the value of b: (b + 8)/2 = 2 b + 8 = 4 b = -4 Thus, the equation of the parabola is: y = a*(x + 4)*(x - 8) Plug in our known point of x=2 and y = -54, and solve for a: -54 = a*(2 + 4)*(2 - 8) -54 = a*6*(-6) a = -54/(-36) a = 3/2 Thus, the equation of the parabola is: y = 3/2*(x + 4)*(x - 8) And a + b = 3/2 - 4 = -5/2.
@jakegibson718Ай бұрын
@@carultch Thank you so much this was really bugging me, I greatly appreciate it!
@majdirabieljilani967527 күн бұрын
why does it work
@elsenored562Ай бұрын
½ the perimeter = 16 ÷ 2 = 8 A = √(8 × 4 × 3 × 1) = 4√6 m²
@junesantos54328 күн бұрын
Square root of 96 = 9.7 | how did it arrived to 4 square root of 6? Just confused..
@junesantos54328 күн бұрын
Now I knew, simplifying radicals.. sqrt of 96 = sqrt of 16 X sqrt of 6 = 4 sqrt of 6
@hasantao17 күн бұрын
This is not a good way to teach math. You need to learn why not how.
@user-xb1ht4py2vАй бұрын
is this derived from Pythagorin ??
@bashersinc.1715Ай бұрын
yes
@fascistpedant758Ай бұрын
How do yet you get from root 96 to 4 root 6?
@mrhtutoringАй бұрын
√96 √(16×6) √16× √6 4 √6
@fascistpedant758Ай бұрын
@@mrhtutoring Thank you.
@AhmedShaban-ju8rfАй бұрын
Where is the proof
@Just_Shadow-_-Ай бұрын
sorry but couldn’t i have just pretended that 4m was the base of the triangle and so 5m was the height? this was i could just have done (4m•5m)/2
@rivenoakАй бұрын
only works with rectangular triangles. in those the two shorter sides work as base and height for each other and for area size it is also obvious because such a triangle is just a rectangle split diagonally. area of the rectangle would be product of two different sides and the triangle is half the size.
@whoff59Ай бұрын
The definition of "height" in a triangle includes a right angle at the base.
@majdirabieljilani967527 күн бұрын
5 is not the height
@AhmedShaban-ju8rfАй бұрын
Please don't present mathematical theorems without proofs respect mathematics
@piccolo64Ай бұрын
i don't know if exist but i found by myself this formula A= √[(2ac)^2 - (a^2 + c^2 - b^2)^2] / 4 , not elegant but is working 😮 i supposed two circles with center (0,0) radius a and (c,0) radius b, the intercept is (x,y) where y will be value of height and Area will be c*y/2, start is system { x^2 + y^2 = a^2; (x-c)^2 + y^2 = b^2} and after some calculus i found this formula. if i choose a=4, b=5 anc c=7 then i use formula and: A= √((2*4*7)^2 - (4^2 + 7^2 - 5^2)^2)/4 = √(3136 - 1600)/4 = √1536 / 4 = √(256*6)/4 = 16√6 /4 = 4√6 cm^2 sorry i'm french, my english is very bad ^^' edit: after factoring and some manipulations, i get the heron formula. Maths are beautiful.