This deserves way more views. The advice in here is invaluable for law students in my opinion, particularly first years
@Learnlawbetter4 жыл бұрын
Thank you. The issue is finding a way to convince law students that the information is valuable. Usually this happens after their first examination period.
@lunganinkosi75603 жыл бұрын
I'm so glad I found this channel. I'm a second year law student all the way from South Africa. :)
@Learnlawbetter3 жыл бұрын
Welcome. Glad you are finding the videos useful.
@jimlee46983 жыл бұрын
I really appreciate all the hard-work that you do to inform us law students. The advice that you give are truly invaluable to me and I'm sure they would be to anyone who is in law school.
@Learnlawbetter3 жыл бұрын
Thanks-appreciate it.
@Skruncharoo6 жыл бұрын
Is there another video where you discuss tips on locating each element of FIRAC within the case? Sometimes rule statements and reasoning statements are hard to spot.
@Learnlawbetter6 жыл бұрын
That is a great idea for a future video--I've placed it on my list. Modernly this isn't a problem as courts almost always identify the rule of law. But you are correct for older cases. There they can be hard to find, especially for a law student. Thanks for the suggestion.
@nhlanhlamalandula15702 жыл бұрын
Not even 1 bombastic word. Even a grade 8 learner can learn this. Nice one and you have just earned my sub🔥🔥🔥
@Learnlawbetter2 жыл бұрын
Thanks, and welcome aboard!
@maryamrajpoot3069 Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much Took a seemingly overwhelming assignment and you made it quite easy and less intimidating! Thanks a bunch 🎀
@Isaacdanger5 жыл бұрын
Thanks man, learning this method for my digital forensics class
@Mel_x Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much! I'm about to start my first semester and I just didn't know how to read cases effectivly to help me for exams and classes!
@Learnlawbetter11 ай бұрын
Glad I could help!
@Dk74234 жыл бұрын
Thanks, professor. Your suggestions are very helpful.
@Learnlawbetter4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for letting me know-I hope they help you.
@bornfree80734 жыл бұрын
What the hell? I was literally just given a case, an example case brief and ordered to brief the case given to me. Im so pissed.
@user-nt4vr9ry4r4 ай бұрын
Im a first year student Nd Im glad I came across this video....very helpful!!!
@TheStealthyGoat6 жыл бұрын
These videos are very well done from a production standpoint!
@Learnlawbetter6 жыл бұрын
Thanks! Its taken a while to figure out the technology.
@foxycat87513 жыл бұрын
Jeeeez - Where have you been! I love your simple to the point short video’s. Especially the Nested IRAC video.
@Learnlawbetter3 жыл бұрын
Thanks.
@ahmadjamshaid1475 Жыл бұрын
Thank you.
@rahulsharma-gq3mw3 жыл бұрын
Extremely helpful! Would love to see more
@Ms.vickyb3 жыл бұрын
Your videos have been extremely helpful. Is it possible for you to do a video where you share a case and then take us through the FIRAC method to ensure we understand and can apply this method in our studies. We can start and stop the video and compare our FIRAC to yours.
@Learnlawbetter3 жыл бұрын
Great idea. I just put it down on my list of future topics--but it's a long list.
@annarose74306 жыл бұрын
Thank you Beau! Very informative video for people who want to study wise!!!
@Learnlawbetter6 жыл бұрын
Thank you again for catching the spelling errors on the earlier video. As you can see, I made the corrections and replaced it. I'm glad that you are finding the videos useful.
@pranavpillai7778 Жыл бұрын
This is working really well for me! Thanks a lot.
@Learnlawbetter11 ай бұрын
Great to hear!
@pranavpillai777811 ай бұрын
@@Learnlawbetter could you provide some insight into keeping your case brief less than one page.
@christineboswell-sexton48946 жыл бұрын
Would it make sense to find a rule that would benefit the potential plaintiff if you would be hypothetically representing them in the "briefing"?
@Learnlawbetter6 жыл бұрын
The plaintiff and defendant don't matter in relation to the rule. You need to find the rule that the court articulated, which sometimes benefits the plaintiff and at other times the defendant.
@christineboswell-sexton48946 жыл бұрын
Learn Law Better Ah ok. I have not yet applied to school nor have I done a brief. I was unsure if there was the possibility of expanding upon the brief by saying, this is what was done and why. However, since this was not something that could not be claimed, we could have pursued this instead.
@scarletmoon92564 жыл бұрын
I'm approaching my 1L orientation, and rewatching these videos has been a lot of help. I am currently reviewing my school's law prep material, but I am having difficulty understanding what a holding is. Is it different from the judgment?
@Learnlawbetter4 жыл бұрын
They are the same. But in appellate decisions, we generally say holding.
@scarletmoon92564 жыл бұрын
@@Learnlawbetter thank you!
@Conversations_2 жыл бұрын
Got a B+ for my test from your videos ❤️
@Learnlawbetter2 жыл бұрын
Great job!
@cureoseando106 жыл бұрын
Excelente canal, me suscribo de inmediato. ¡Saludos desde México!
@Learnlawbetter6 жыл бұрын
Gracias.
@azminazulaikhaamiruddin35036 жыл бұрын
This is so much good to help on my exam next week! But, excuse me, for the 'Rule' does it mean any Acts that related to the case? Thank you.
@Learnlawbetter6 жыл бұрын
The rule is another word for the law that is applicable. For example, suppose that the facts you are provided on a test deal with the intentional tort of battery. You would need to supply the rule, or law for battery: "a battery is the intentional contact of another in a harmful or offensive manner." Also, keep in mind that you must provide the rules, or law, for elements of the rule. Staying with Battery for a moment, you would need to define "intent," "contact," and "harmful or offensive."
@azminazulaikhaamiruddin35036 жыл бұрын
Learn Law Better alright, now I understand. Thank you.
@rooseveltbarnes63815 жыл бұрын
This was a very informative post
@futurekillerful4 жыл бұрын
Is the conclusion there same thing as the ruling the court gave on the case?
@Learnlawbetter4 жыл бұрын
Excellent question! By conclusion, I mean the answer to the legal question that was being decided in the case. That's a bit different from the holding, which might be something like "case reversed" or "case remanded.