Firearm Law Update: State of Emergency Firearm Ban

[@CatmandoTNR]

SCOTUS needs to grow a spine and say what they mean and quit letting the activist "judges" play games with our rights. A right delayed is a right denied.

[@TheGreatRepeller]

The Supreme Court is now in the "Our Safety is more valuable than your Liberty" stage. The opposite of what Team George Washington said. Pretty much exactly why they gave women the finger instead of the vote.

[@Zachary77]

NO. The People need to grow a spine and warn SCOTUS that they had better follow Constitutional Law and the Bill of Rights or face dire and permanent consequences!

[@SandCrabNews]

Martial Law cannot suspend COTUS without government abdicating powers to govern.

[@Devildg255]

LOL you think scotus wants us to have guns or even the maga/republicans for that matter. Yea okay they all want them gone they just say enough to keep the vote, moment that isn't a pivotal group of people they are gone. Or they put up a terrible loser on one side so the other side wins and becomes the scapegoat when they amend the constitution to take them away.

[@ij2750]

SCOTUS is not pro gun no need to say more.

[@MooseKnuckleMike]

🤦🏻Half the point of owning a firearm is for declared emergencies

[@crazysquirrel9425]

Emergencies do not trump personal rights. PERIOD. Neither does Martial Law.

[@greentoke4589]

If anything, state of emergency makes those rights all the more important.

[@cornfusedatbest3980]

Are you stating this as common sense or is this an actual law? We have the most ignorant laws because we have the most ignorant people. Our GOD given right to freedom, unfortunately, does not exclude those that have to be constantly reminded not to stick their limbs near spinning mower blades. The fact that some people use their noggins just because they figure it was meant for a hat has reached epic proportions.

[@RaymondSwanson-u9y]

@@cornfusedatbest3980 It's actual law. "Shall not be infringed." That's in the Constitution and the Constitution is the highest law of the land.

[@joesashiify]

Sic Semper Tyrannis. Yes.

[@Sandalphon777]

Chief Justice John Marshall, Marbury vs Madison 1806 "Any bill or law repugnant to The Constitution is null and void".

[@arch3088]

An un-constitutional law is not a law.

[@i-evi-l]

The Rule of Law basically extends that the Court Room, no courts, is the arbiter under every circumstance in any dispute that calls for social debate, and yes crime is basically by definition social debate. The Street, colloquial term for Public venue, can have mutual understanding between Citizen and LEO under ANY circumstance until pressure forces for Court Room adjudication. This is the basic tenet under Common Law(not historical archaic common law but the still alive practiced tenets) that allows Cops the freedom of instigating law enforcement actions as a preference of choice. AKA the base legal logic of the SCOTUS Ruling saying cops are not obligated to defend the public. So basically the Street Parlay procedures, the root word Parlay being the root of Parliament, are both the open forum of establishing the contingency of if Public Adjudication procedures become a necessity whether in form of Criminal or Public Court proceedings. UNderstanding what Rule of Law actually means helps dispel a lot of confusion over how Court proceedings actually function , and why we have and use that function and importance of the phrase itself.

[@TimothyTerrell-o2o]

A local state or a federal judge can be removed from Cort office if the people who they are assigned to serve decide to do it. These same persons can be prosecuted for malfeasance in office and sentenced to whatever punishment the people see fitting for they're crimes. We the people have that right by the law. Our court officials seem to have a different opinion on this.

[@TimothyTerrell-o2o]

​@internetomaticsome forget that the people ARE the state.

[@889976889]

In theory yes, reality is a 🐷 will still lock you up for it.

[@thechosenfew2180]

It's only a lot if people follow it

[@geminiascension7018]

I D G A F what the court says. Consitution is law. 2A SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.

[@grantodamax]

@@bukka6697 Dude that is not what that means at all. Do you even know what "well regulated" means as per the constitution?

[@IraPettit-wi2vf]

Well said

[@coyote520]

@@bukka6697 Wrong, again. There is no mandate of being in a militia, and regardless, militias are made up of CITIZENS, not government. SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.

[@crazycobramantim]

@@bukka6697 Apparently you don't know it - you are the Militia - the organized militia - but subject to call up. Hope you bring something beyond a slingshot and ignorance of the dual status Title 10 / Title 32 US Code.

[@marsrocket]

Doesn’t the Constitution say that the Supreme Court makes these decisions? You can’t be against one without being against the other.

[@Guyjharrison]

if the military can issue an 18 year a firearm then any american 18 year old can purchase and own a firearm

[@mail-qh2qc]

Machine guns, tanks, explosives, and air strikes.

[@Bolo2028]

They gave me a gun when I was still 17.

[@Redcoat11]

The military can TRAIN and issue a firearm to an 18 yo. Allowing young adults with incomplete brain development to purchase firearms with no training is another story

[@garystover5387]

@@Redcoat11, the Constitution does not apply age brackets to our God-given rights, but yet you openly agree that a state has a right to dictate otherwise. Interesting. I know many individuals in the 21-100 year-old bracket who do not possess complete brain development, but yet they are unaffected by this ruling. Your position is flawed.

[@TPaine1776]

@@Bolo2028 Same here.

[@gunnutbikenut6939]

I have said it before we can’t trust any of these people

[@PoolsideData]

profile for life

[@johnz7104]

If you allow them to take away your rights for an emergency, they will make up emergencies to take away your rights.

[@TheGreatRepeller]

The 2nd amendment is 27 words. None of those 27 words mentions a "Firearms Ban." In fact the 27 words include "shall not be infringed." The same Judiciary that invented Qualified Immunity for government employees today almost totally ignores the 2nd amendment. The same people that conclude putting your weapon into your pocket makes it NOT A WEAPON ANYMORE but something far worse should not be interpreting ANY LAWS.....

[@mail-qh2qc]

There’s no logic regarding it. They do not care and they want you disarmed.

[@growing367]

Because the word "firearm" is made up. The right word is "Arms". They're messing us with words.

[@vmark78]

In a state of emergency and shtf don't open carry but carry. I'd rather be alive than a good-looking corpse.

[@Acuity-1]

When the state puts your life at risk with laws that are not based in reality or morality it is your right to not comply.

[@onthefarside2096]

So then our military could be against the law if giving these eighteen to twenty-year-olds firearms.

[@thomasjefferson1457]

"What country before ever existed a century and half without a rebellion?" Thomas Jefferson

[@michael.cschrubbe5879]

WELL SAID! GOOD EYE!

[@ottos335]

NO law restricting our God given right to defend ourselves is constitutional

[@funNactive1]

So, no Selective Service until 21

[@jeffreyblose8295]

God Dam It SCOTUS DO YOUR FREAKING JOB AND END THIS NONSENSE! There is no provision in the Constitution for the suspension of rights or the suspension of the Constitution itself. End this Unconstitutional craziness before this ends in massive bloodshed!

[@TheTibetyak]

1. Why is it not required for SCOTUS to give reasons for their decisions? 2. Why did Pennsylvania declare a state of emergency for COVID? 3. Basically, if a gentle rainstorm is predicted, the governor can call a state of emergency to control what they want.

[@periloustactic]

A permit is an infringement. National Carry Conseal. The US Constitution is not weather dependant or subject to ones feelings.

[@jack-n3p5j]

But the pigs will enforce anything no matter if it goes against their oath.

[@patrickshaw8595]

Or the whims of those in any State or Federal Capitol City.

[@martinmoore5335]

The supreme court dont understand ,SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED !!!!!!!!!!!

[@PoolsideData]

8 percent of the population AGAIN doing horrible things.

[@UnregisteredSkeptic]

Who is that 8%?

[@corneliuswowbagger]

Hmmm… I bought my first handgun in Pennsylvania at seventeen! Just before the NFA of 1968 took effect. My 4 x Great Grandfather joined the Virginia Militia at sixteen and, of course was armed!

[@carrybigspeaksoft1758]

Either say 18-21 are not adult or allow them to be adults… you can’t send them to die on the battlefield while also not giving them all the rights in the country that they’re willing to die for

[@3CODKing]

The reason why it's 18 to be required to register for selective service is because they are easily molded. Their minds are easily influenced. Makes it easier for them to follow unconstitutional orders

[@velvetjones1856]

If 18-20 year olds can't carry firearms, does this also mean shouldn't be allowed to do so in the military? Could be bad for reserves and ROTC in PA.

[@joshsmith8417]

Do 18-20 year olds have a requirement to pay full taxes? They wouldn’t have full representation under the constitution.

[@u2bbastard]

They didn't give a reason because "Banning the carrying of arms during a declared state of emergency being constitutional aligns with our future goals of banning the carrying of firearms during emergencies for everyone but the military, since we can declare a state of emergency whenever we want and thereby restrict gun owners" didn't seem like it would go over well if actually put down on paper.

[@nobama3468]

In 1976, at Edson Range, I shot a 48 of 50 in prone position at 500 yards during a scored boot camp rifle test. In a few weeks I would turn 18. Courts change, laws change, GOD never changes. Semper Fi Is it time yet?? What time is it??

[@WarriorServantofYah]

@@coach-Because it’s obvious to anyone with the most basic reading comprehension skills that nobama3468 was only *17 years old* in 1976 while serving in a military capacity and demonstrated excellent proficiency with a *fire a r m.* If the government can issue 17 and 18 year olds *fire a r ms,* then why are we worried about prohibiting 18-20 year old citizens from being able to purchase the very same items the government issues them? Is the document one signs to join the military some magic talisman that guarantees the 17-18 year old who signs it *is more responsible, is more important, and has more rights* than a 17-18 year old that doesn’t sign it?

[@curranh.8328]

​@@coach-You're brain dead? Maybe go ask chatGPT to explain it like you're five. No, four...

[@patriot6350]

I believe he's saying us old timers could shoot the eye out of a rabbit before age 10, and nobama could shoot great scores before age 18 ​@@coach-

[@patrickbodine1300]

Time for noncompliance.

[@nobama3468]

@@coach- 18 year old men can be exceptional fire arms users? Yes, I am old now. Had to buy an Arken scope.

[@davidmacon1138]

Such B.S..... So what about those in uniform service? Further driving the point of rules for thee but not for me and those I order to go fight... I'm flabbergasted at what our country has become.

[@darrenwerner1829]

In case anyone missed it, you can't prohibit someone because they aren't an upstanding citizen. that's pretty plain. By this logic even non violent felons can't be prohibited.

[@davefletch3063]

Violent felons cant be prohibited. Once you serve your time and are let out into the public, you are due your rights. If you are too dangerous, they have no business letting you out

[@curranh.8328]

​@@davefletch3063on GOD.

[@alancranford3398]

Nice that a minor child is competent to choose "gender affirming care" but isn't competent to carry a firearm in public.

[@Idoobbberz_TV]

Oh please. What a moot point. Comparing apples and oranges. You wouldn't want anyone transgender to carry in the first place.

[@jatpack3]

18 to 20 year olds are second class citizens. They are fully subject to the law but are denied rights under it.

[@obesuspuer88]

Next up no carry for anyone during an emergency followed by a permanent emergency declaration from all the manufactured crisis caused by the same lawmakers who dont want you to carry...

[@davefletch3063]

Followed up by mass non compliance and overthrow of the tyrannical regime as out,ined and prescribed in the declaration

[@tonylowell8422]

That you for keeping the members updated much appreciated all of you people.

[@Mr.Nobodylive]

As an ex con who got his gun rights back, I would not give them up during a mandatory buy back. I'd rather die than give up that right again.

[@garyb.4080]

Well I guess if I was PA., in the National Guard , and was 18-20, I would tell my superiors, that I’m not allowed to play! I joined the service when I was 17.

[@patrickshaw8595]

Everybody says it isn't true but my father was drafted at age 17 on his birthday. The War Department was kind of going nuts getting ready to invade Japan even though they knew they knew Germany was about beaten.

[@i.r.wayright1457]

Back when I was 20 years old, the government issued me a full auto rifle. Seems like a double standard to me.

[@herbderbler1585]

States of emergency are one of the biggest reasons to own a firearm. I don't care if the thief is wearing a fancy uniform. If they try to take my guns when I have committed no crime, they will be treated like any other criminal.

[@MrDillaKilla]

Tagged, for proof of premeditation...

[@patrickbodine1300]

*FREEDOM* ...SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED

[@williamthomas3620]

Well done. People in that age group can be drafted into the military, given a gun. and sent to far off places to fight our wars. but cannot be trusted at home. I call BS,

[@brotherbrovet1881]

I thank God I live in Missouri, where the 2A has no minimum age to exercise it. Here, it's legal for kids to carry concealed.

[@NEHappyCamper]

don't worry, your leaders will soon change this.

[@chucklutter7399]

First time viewer, just subscribed. Looking forward to seeing more of your content. I would like to know what it would take for SCOTUSs rulings for a single state to automatically be applied to all states. Thank you in advance for your responses. BEST AND PEACE

[@russellhix6802]

The constitution doesn’t give any citizen a single right. It is a contract for the federal government to be formed and restricts the federal government from infringing on your God give rights. Our rights as a people are laid out in the Declaration of Independence. Tench Coxe defined our rights and why they exist in great detail using simple words that anyone could understand easily as most didn’t even have what we would consider a high school education of our modern time. Tench Coxe, who undoubtedly had a great influence on what was written and included in the constitution plainly stated that the people should be so heavily armed with modern weapons that any government and standing army would fear them.

[@RaymondSwanson-u9y]

Actually it does. The Constitution is the bases of all of our rights. God doesn't grant us rights. We have free will. That means we have to make our own rights and wrongs. God wants us to figure it out and not rely on him for everything. God gave us ten laws, none of which defines a right, just what is wrong. And the Declaration of Independent has nothing to do with it. The laws didn't come until AFTER the Constitution was signed and laws were created. It's the Constitution that gives us those rights. That's when I swore an oath to protect the Constitution when I was sworn into active duty. Not the Declaration of Independent. No God. The Constitution. It is the source of our laws. It is the source of our rights.

[@Eddie87Grant]

Rahimi decision has NOTHING to do with the 18 to 20 year old carrying a firearm!!!

[@DanSanChannel]

Well, as a person under 20 years old i guess ill never have to worry about registering for a draft since I would be fighting for rights I do not have…

[@stvargas69]

A free person doesn't need permission

[@davefletch3063]

There is no provision in the constitution for deprivation of the God given rights outlined in the first 10. Shall not be infringed doesnt have any modifiers. An emergency is when the right most needs to be invoked

[@gregoryking7607]

I follow the Constitution of the United States and the Bill of Rights. Everything else can kiss it. We The People

[@rbm6184]

Firearm Law Update: State of Emergency Firearm Ban The SCOTUS has previously ruled that the US Constitution is not suspended during emergencies back during the plandemic. There is no age discrimination in the text, history, and tradition of the 2nd Amendment at the time of its ratification. In fact, “A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves…and include, according to the past and general usuage of the states, all men capable of bearing arms… "To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them." - Richard Henry Lee, Federal Farmer No. 18, January 25, 1788

[@charlesdiaz6974]

Thank you so much for the information keep us update on the situation in appreciate it very much thank you

[@blindsquirrel7802]

At 13 I ordered a 410 single shot bolt action shotgun through the Sears and Roebuck catalog, went to the pickup location and paid for it and took it home. I've never been to jail.

[@vashmatrix5769]

Rahimi only says that someone who has been PROVEN VIOLENT cant be TEMPORARILY disarmed.

[@butchmawyer8583]

I'm so sick of judges that make our lives so hard. It is all politicize. I think our rights in this country is a myth anymore

[@vicdiaz5180]

Doesn’t James Reeves of TFB work for you guys?

[@echofoxtrotwhiskey1595]

I think so.

[@DaveL9170]

On contract. He is not W2 employee.

[@SandCrabNews]

Martial Law cannot suspend COTUS without government abdicating powers to govern.

[@marvthedog1972]

so.. in that case, the people in western NC would be victims of looters and vandals because they cant carry a firearm after the hurricane destroyed the place. The whole area is under emergency conditions right now. Thankfully i do not believe NC has such law. but would shock me if Roy Stupider would make some executive decree..

[@sedition4267]

Be ungovernable...ALWAYS.

[@theoriginaldashriprock]

With the likelihood of civil unrest ensuing in the coming days and weeks, I am encouraging all of my friends and co-workers to make sure they are carrying with them at all times. None of us know when or where unrest will arise. Something as simple as being stuck at a traffic light, you will be in trouble if people start causing mayhem around you. We gotta be ready.

[@buzzsah]

I feel as a 50+ year instructor in both NRA and State Blue / Gold card. Plus a father of 5 adult children, 7 adult grand children, and 11 great-grand children. I noticed all growing up, I would say only 3 were adult enough to own / carry a firearm. Plus seeing their friends grow, I would say maybe 2 out of every 100. I see more than I'd like to say 21 and over that I've given classes to, that I would not give a permit, however, the Law determines that. Now, in their defense, if they are old enough to be drafted, they should be old enough to own a firearm, and drink.

[@SandCrabNews]

All Amendments to COTUS, are COTUS!

[@upStomp]

Just as we have self defense insurance, many of us in anti-2A states would like to see associations provide firearms law insurance. It's becoming more and more difficult to stay within the "law" as a gun owner in many locations.

[@WhiskeyOutWest]

In an emergency you can ignore many laws, FYI. In an emergency, you can speed. In an emergency you can use HAM radio w/o a license. We are in a dire emergency in our country. Act accordingly.

[@michaelzimmerman9221]

The constitution is absolute!

[@WayneSmith-zx3tf]

Don't ask, don't tell.

[@JohnDuke3d]

If the Supreme Court states 18 to 20 year olds cannot carry a gun does this mean someone cannot join the military and carry a gun until they are 21 years old? Most of our military start out between 18 to 20 year olds. To me this is what the meaning would be so, a person joining the military cannot join until they are 21 years old. Am I correct?

[@josephpadula2283]

They are trying to disarm the militia . Current federal law title 10 usc 246 a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard. (b) The classes of the militia are- (1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and (2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia. (Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 14, § 311; Pub. L. 85-861, § 1(7), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1439; Pub. L. 103-160, div. A, title V, § 524(a), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1656; renumbered § 246, Pub. L. 114-328, div. A, title XII, § 1241(a)(2), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2497.)

[@josephpadula2283]

Note 17 not 18 to 45 years old .

[@Leslie-es5ij]

Unorganized milita ! You, me and everyone else ! With no interference from the government !

[@user-vv5bv6wb1s]

That's just crazy that a 18 year old male or female be handed a fire arm go to war to fight for are county for us knowing that they could probably give up there lives for there home and family for the United States of America the home of the free and brave the homes we all love than no are children is are children we will fight for are child for the love of God

[@durangodave]

basically if you are not 18 to 20 years old, and your older than 20, this has nothing to do with you and does not effect you or how you carry.

[@jw546]

What was the breakdown? How did each justice vote?

[@ajcottrill4949]

When criminals try to make laws, lawlessness abounds.

[@RaymondSwanson-u9y]

What part of 'shall not be infringed' do these people not understand?

[@IraPettit-wi2vf]

2a is not a states option and should never become one

[@deanhenthorn1890]

No clear ruling for this specific ruling, only his opinion.

[@pierowmania2775]

SCOTUS did several things here. First, they definitely "punted" this back down to the district Court. However, I think they were "clearing the field" for the Snopes case out of the 3rd District. I also think that they are hoping to address this at the Federal Level, perhaps regarding purchasing hand guns. Finally, I think that they want a little more talk in the area of "responsibleness" to be had. Rahimi talked about "temporarily" removing rights so that aspect probably doesn't apply here as "States of Emergency" are temporary by definition (even when they last WAY to long.) I was disappointed when this case was GVR'd but I only think that it is strategically delayed (hopefully.)

[@deana.blackburn4720]

Look at the new law that was just passed in Massachusetts

[@59jm24]

"A well regulated militia, " ... Punctuation is important.

[@xusmico187]

so scotus vakets.... what good is it.

[@bobrod5834]

Thats what "shall no be infringed" means...right?

[@charlesmsloat2578]

If 18 to 20 year old can't purchase or carry then they should serve in our military.

[@FharishAhmedPortfolio]

LoL what firearms? I got nothing 😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@davidhagerman7165]

What bothers me is 18 to 20 years olds that were drafted or joined the arm force are adult enough to be trained in military arminut, pistols, rifle, tanks, cannon, anti air craft and tank weapons, flying multimillion dollar aircraft with bombs, machine guns and atomic bombs. So if they are mature enough for the military they are centernly mature enough to be a civilian arm person.

[@robertspickler1385]

Sounds like, NO OPEN CARRY

[@patriciamunro493]

Its not about safety its about control

[@tonyl3762]

Hey, where are Emily and Richard?

[@jonflanagin6682]

18-20 year olds can't during a State of Emergency,but can during a war.

[@joym3415]

No service in military or national guard or any other service till 21 + years old .

[@MikeSiedlecki]

Can/should a government be allowed to suspend constitutional rights on occasion by simply "declaring" an emergency, crisis, etc? To that I ask: when is constitutional guidance most needed, during times of relative peace and tranquility or in times of chaos and uncertainty?

[@JohnRice992]

Well, 18-year-olds are minimum Military Enlistment age, 16 if they have their parents' permission. If they are "Not Responsible" enough for possessing a firearm, then any attempt to draft them would seem rather hypocritical, don't you think? But Form 4473 does in fact ask if a buyer might be the subject of a protective order or ever been convicted of a violent crime. I am not against the concept of keeping these particular types of weapons out of the hands of those who would, and have, use them wrongly, but we can't call everyone under the age of 21 irresponsible when we also expect them to fight and potentially lose their life for our sake. No, I am so fed up with the Nanny government.

[@kingmasterlord]

i like this dude, let's get him into 6 digit followers!

[@Aztorak_1]

It's pointless when you can easily acquire a big bore pre-charged pneumatic air rifle with 5 shot rotary magazines and have it sent straight to your home. I recommend all government officials consult with a neurologist in case it is brain damage.

[@windmolenfarm8030]

Didn't they recently rule that 18-21 year olds Could purchase, own, and obtain a CCW permit? How does that stack up against this new ruling? I can't believe they are that hypocritical, so there must be something else going on here!

[@garymadhatter3565]

So these citizens should not be allowed to vote, enlist in the military, get a drivers , or anything else that has this age requirement. The government thinks it can have its cake and eat it too.

[@DW10463]

When I was that age, I was armed, but I should not have been.

[@no_handle_required]

We will not now, nor will we ever, comply with a firearm ban. We the people have been pushed far enough.

[@Steve-qt9ce]

There's going to come a time when Men follow the Constitution, not the Courts.

[@mad0scientist]

Where does the 2A mention ANY age??????

[@peanut3050]

WILSON V HAWAII IS A MUCH BIGGER CASE SCOTUS CONSIDERS IT IN NOV. 1ST CONFRENCE!!!!!!😇😇😇

[@ellissmithjr6599]

Down here in Mississippi,this stupidity would Not fly nor would Law Enforcement here attemp to Enforce such Stupidity... 👍😎🇺🇸

[@J.P-s6p]

Will never ever comply with tyrants …..EVER!

[@herbderbler1585]

An 18 year old is either an adult or not. I'm tired of this Diet Adult status where you get three years of responsibility with none of the privileges.

[@kypparmstrong2775]

I'm sorry, I missed the part of the 2nd Amendment that had a age restriction.

[@Mike80528]

A state of emergency is when someone is most likely to need a firearm. (sigh)

[@thomasjefferson1457]

That being said a perpetual state of of emergency can be created for the next 100 years or more.

[@davefletch3063]

Already has been since 9/11