I have lots of binos , no matter how high the optic quality the 8x25 image stab canons in the daytime show more detail as things are still, more still than on a tripod as your head is not moving about! Great for night sky to but less light than 7x50s obviously but not as much as you would think.
@elisaprice98092 ай бұрын
Thank you, for your review. Just started hearing about image stabilization and thought the Canons could be a good fit but wanted to understand the pros and cons of the 12x36 in particular.
@AbcDino8438 ай бұрын
There's nothing like image stabilized binoculars, once you try them you can't really go back, I just wished we had more options. Like a higher magnification L model from Canon would be amazing.
@yomchadash Жыл бұрын
have the 12x36 III , the only objectionable issue for me is the CA on high contrast objects, for astronomy it isnt a problem, for birding i would go the 10x42 route. (havent tried them though). i got mine for general use, star gazing, travelling and hiking and for that they are overall a better pick than the 10x42i think due to weight difference (and its half the price).
@marioarias99422 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video. I’ve had my eyes on the 10x42 for many years but I think I’m finally going to pull the trigger on these bad boys as I’m going on a trip in the Fall .
@hecard5 ай бұрын
Were they worth the price ?
@justasking452 Жыл бұрын
Canon 18x50 IS Image Stabilized Binoculars or Canon 10x42 L IS WP Image Stabilized Binoculars (both are listed @ 1.5k USD @ b & h as of march 2023) main purpose : STARGAZING / ASTRONOMY which binoculars would be best suited for this?
@koyaanisrider69435 ай бұрын
I would tend to the 10x42 because of the greater field of view and the higher optical quality. I tried them at night and they are great. Haven't tried the 18x50.
@janellgarcia4171 Жыл бұрын
Great review!
@DanBarksey6 ай бұрын
If the “L” glass is anything like the camera “L” glass then they must be a joy to look through … they must be expensive , never saw a cheap”L” lens