How the UNSC Plans to Deny Veto Powers to the Global South | Vantage with Palki Sharma

[@rockyjohnson1775]

This veto thing should be abolished

[@GwynBleys]

Unless someone vetoes the abolishment

[@AbuSayyaf963]

@@GwynBleys The veto power comes from strength, not elections. The veto power is used to protect weak countries. Otherwise, the veto will be a war between a big country and a small country.

[@rockyjohnson1775]

@@malianwong CCP bot shut up…more than 150 countries voting for one resolution and a dictator country vetoes it….this is joke

[@robvannNS]

So it becomes arm twisting by the US just like the General Assembly.

[@kashifshehzadsehar7499]

​@@GwynBleys procedure to End/Overturn the Veto Power/Vote of UN Security Council? Can end 🇷🇺 🇺🇦 War. kzbin.info/www/bejne/rKvJoX93pLyhbsksi=0BM_9qykhLsK8gni

[@Civilized_1]

Constitution of USA Article (1). Rights to Hypocrisy

[@Priyaykanth2]

Backed by Deepu State

[@AItv2011]

😂😂😂

[@TheRichCapitalist]

No different from most other major powers.

[@myvu-mv5ix]

​@@TheRichCapitalistthere's alotttt of difference...

[@TheRichCapitalist]

@@myvu-mv5ix How so? Can you elaborate? The specific tactics, motivations, circumstances, and other nuances differ, but the underlying concept of double standards is present across most major powers. Consider how India criticizes China, but not Russia, for activities that both countries do, albeit in different forms. It depends on India's interests, not consistent applications of principles.

[@blackmamba3427]

It's time for India to quit UN. This organisation has become irrelevant, useless, and hopeless, run by self-centred countries. Global South can start an organisation on its own to serve the general good of its own people.

[@myvu-mv5ix]

We provide troops and money to this shitt house still.😅 i donno why?

[@wionporky9937]

If you don't have a big head dont ware a big hat.

[@blackmamba3427]

@wionporky9937 China 🇨🇳 has a big head but nothing inside except greed and stealing.

[@mbmusiclist3743]

not only india,,but the whole member of it,,except this 5 nation,,since like they are only running this irrelevant organization,,,look at the case of palestine,,they do not even recognise it as a sovereign nation.....means they are only in favor in their own allies

[@jagadishbhatta9562]

Yeah, UN is useless

[@gcinanomela6772]

All the nations that are not permanent members of the UN should have left that thing a long time ago. 🤷‍♂️

[@designspace3144]

The OG gang is OG gang. They will have Veto and not anyone else.

[@SuperYoman100]

@@designspace3144 Either the gang accommodates new powerful players in town, or gets thrown over by a new gang that does.

[@pich496]

@@SuperYoman100 but the new gangs are still not powerful enough yet it seems.

[@AbuSayyaf963]

@@SuperYoman100 The veto power comes from strength, not elections. The veto power is used to protect weak countries. Otherwise, the veto will be a war between a big country and a small country.

[@jagadishbhatta9562]

​@@designspace3144 Then others don't need to be members of UN 😂

[@dreamer1081]

Brazil, South africa, India deserves the permanent seat. The best solution is remove the veto power, the west supports democracy and quick to judge others then why should 5 members have a power to overthrow the majority of the council?

[@Make_America_Native_Again_111]

Who decides who deserves a permanent seat and who deserves a veto ?

[@AbuSayyaf963]

The veto power comes from strength, not elections. The veto power is used to protect weak countries. Otherwise, the veto will be a war between a big country and a small country.

[@anksssssssss]

​@@Make_America_Native_Again_111 based on population and representation of continent .

[@Spoon89803]

@@anksssssssss that is disproportionate power and unfair to other nations, it will give the most power to China besides India, and this will not go down well with many nations at odds with China. The best thing to do is to completely eliminate veto power from the security council, allow 7 to 8 permanent members and lets the other seats be temporary and rotated every 2 years

[@pravinkumar-my5ud]

​@@Make_America_Native_Again_111population size power etc

[@bobbyhabib2827]

Regarding UNSC I fully agree with Palki, I couldn't have said it better myself. The main hurdle to UNSC voting system is Veto power by permanent members that kills democratic voting system of majority of opinions plus three of five permanent members will always have same opinion. It better be my way or the highway.

[@kamaljeetsingh1467]

UK France US always vote as a bloc and no one among the 5 states will ever want to dilute their voting power with others!! So building a counter block is the best way to make your voice heard as many economies of Asia and Eastern world are no longer the same as it was in 1950’s

[@infohound41]

@@kamaljeetsingh1467 That's not true, UK has often expressed support for India to be in UNSC. US has expressed support for two seats for African Countries

[@kamaljeetsingh1467]

@@infohound41 Verbal assurances are given by every permanent member except China to India 🤦 but practically these countries never allow any process to start at Unsc reform claiming countries like Italy Argentina China have issues 😂 so now these new tricks of non veto membership is just like a remote without any control over anything!! Better start engaging in new organizations like BRICs and slowly developing the alternatives to existing system of governance managed by West to control the world economy and governance!!

[@kamaljeetsingh1467]

@@infohound41 Verbal support was given by everyone except China buddy!! But practically no one wants to initiate the reforms and give excuses of country X or Y isn’t agreeing 😂🤦 the only solution is build an alternative model slowly engaging emerging economies and global south!! It might take decades but still better than non productive UN ✌️ Brics, Asian Development Bank, local currency trading, non SWIFT payments alternatives all are steps in right direction

[@TheRichCapitalist]

Right. The US, France, and UK will almost always vote one way, and China and Russia will almost always vote the other way.

[@vishaljose133]

First of all the system of veto is undemocratic. If veto exists what is the need for a united organization of nations.

[@AbuSayyaf963]

The veto power comes from strength, not elections. The veto power is used to protect weak countries. Otherwise, the veto will be a war between a big country and a small country.

[@mbmusiclist3743]

veto means..power

[@phillipchan6919]

Not all the members nations of UN live in a democracy.

[@vishaljose133]

@@phillipchan6919 Are you saying all the other countries dosent want equal treatment and rights. And by the way the countrues which have veto powers are saying they are democratic and are constitutionally democratic !

[@phillipchan6919]

@@vishaljose133 Russia is not a Democracy. Russia has veto power.

[@Anna_Batista-w6v]

Permanent seats to Germany and Japan? You've got to be kidding me.

[@aagamjain812]

​@@HafiZzZzZzko hi guy you have to 😢😢😢😢p

[@NjanParayum]

Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a joke? Sfu​@@HafiZzZzZz

[@AnoNymous-i1o]

Lets guess, who got the largest military base in Germany & Japan ?

[@AnoNymous-i1o]

@@HafiZzZzZz So the response for killing military personnel is nuking the civilians ?

[@Wolfwarrior2024]

​@@HafiZzZzZz Japan is not to be mess with . Strong country

[@asdasdasddgdgdfgdg]

This has been ongoing for years. India Germany Japan and Brazil (countries with lager economies and demographies than most currently UNSC permanent members) demand a seat at the UNSC but get denied. I think these countries should leave the UN if the UN doesn't want to play fair.

[@mohabarts]

I love love telling the reality with no fear palki shàrma i am African as a African i love love your news

[@dhirendrasingh1382]

I think, India and other global south countries should revive "League of Nations " parallel to so called UN.

[@karthikk7650]

Agree 💯

[@tada2508]

BRICS is already there where western nations are not allowed.

[@Power_Of_Truth5]

BRICS

[@harshsingh1989]

India should lead the way by quitting UN. It's foolhardy to think anybody would give up there power. Thus a new system should be created with power distribution reflecting the current reality.

[@Kevin-fq3zh]

@@harshsingh1989 then please leave. the sooner the better

[@chundurupraneethsai5635]

@@Kevin-fq3zh if left, UN will be deprived of crucial medicines, world's largest battalion of peacekeepers, and a lot more... 1. Grow up, you fool. 2. Instead of spitting venom, introspect yourself.

[@GreaterPakistanEng]

I guess everyone gets some benefits and money from U.N that's why countries don't.

[@Udayan-cz7li]

I like your point 👍

[@NjanParayum]

​@@Kevin-fq3zhWeh Donhn't Wahnna Givh uhp awher vehto pawher. Get lost poop.

[@anshultripathi6925]

Closing with a banger !! That is the Palki's style !!!!🔥🔥🔥

[@TingMo-n4i]

I support South Africa in UN Security Council. It’s about time a African nation should be there

[@a0z98]

Not South Africa 😂 Burkina Faso

[@mcdonald1821]

Only one country has had the most successful peace and diplomatic mission in Africa and truly represent Africa with the largest black people on earth and that is NIGERIA. South Africa is partly european and Algeria aligns with the Arabs.

[@KrteenAnand]

I mean veto has no power if everybody left that stupid organisation

[@watercutterlan1401]

the power is the veto.

[@michaelrandle8316]

Considering that the UN is a Western creation, and has an obvious track record of pursuing its own interests through the UNSC, the answer to this question is an obvious one.

[@mcdonald1821]

I said it. No other BRICS nation will come on board.

[@badbad-cat]

While in UNSC, United Kingdom still kept colonies. As a punishment, UK should be kicked out of UNSC and replaced by a former colony, ideally India 💥

[@tada2508]

Just because Kishore said so, doesn’t mean that this has any traction. Largesse has no meaning in the acts of nations.

[@Aftermath-News]

😂😂😂😂😂 in your dreams. Why would they let United Kingdom's puppet state (India) become a memeber of UNSC😂😂😂

[@phillipchan6919]

India can’t keep its streets clean. How do that keep UNSC clean?

[@VinodBandari-ps5yd]

​@@Aftermath-Newspuppet state who?

[@PlaYer-sn5or]

India swifted it's master from UK to US, no different.

[@fahmad7194]

BRICS could make its own UNSC at some stage

[@sunnychoudhary6041]

I don't think we should follow western model of inequality. We should build a more democratic system .

[@isasaleh1508]

No one seems to be taking about south America or are comfortable with the current status of the United Nations?

[@VinodBandari-ps5yd]

guyana deserves the permanent seat in unsc since its growing influence because of oil discovery 😊

[@myvu-mv5ix]

Let's leave the UN in mass then they will enjoy veto among those 5 members vetoing eachother...😂😂😂😂

[@spoidy3180]

Thanks to Nehru for gifting our seat to China🤣

[@merrick6484]

Don‘t be stupid, India doesn‘t even exist for League of Nations in 1945. There was not even a country or nation call India.😆 Like a bastard born out of legal marriage.

[@GreaterPakistanEng]

Really

[@NjanParayum]

Sorry it wasn't OPs father. But my mistake. I should have worn a condom. Sorry chat 😒

[@Rav01508]

A "World Super Power" is one that can exert it's influence/dominance on the World's stage. For example, USA has the USD as the reserve currency of the world whereas China is the factory of the world and also the largest exporter of trade of the World. Russia, on the other hand, is one of the top 5 oil producing country and also the country with the largest number of nuclear arsenal. In addition, Russia also happens to be largest country of the world in terms of land mass and also one of the largest resources rich country. Take a look at how big the size of Russia on the map? What about India? 1) World Super Super Power , India , wanted to pay cheap and heavily discounted Russian oil in Rupees to take advantage of the Ukraine's crisis/war but was ordered to pay in Chinese Yuan instead. 2) World Super Super Power , India , objects to BRICS expansion but everyone in BRICS ignored India's demand and went ahead and expanded BRICS (refer to BRICS Summit) 3) World Super Super Power , India , said that they are "Global leader of technology". However, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has said that India's attempt to develop an artificial intelligence tool like ChatGPT is "hopeless" and that is why Sam Altman over the weekend called for enhanced collaboration between the U.S. and China on artificial intelligence development? Is Sam Altman, the inventor of ChatGPT, belittling India and praising China? Fun fact 1: OpenAI's Sam Altman Makes Global Call For AI Regulation-And Includes China. Contributor. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman over the weekend called for enhanced collaboration between the U.S. and China on artificial intelligence development.13 Jun 2023 Fun fact 2: 10 Jun 2023 - OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has said that India's attempt to develop an artificial intelligence tool like ChatGPT is 'hopeless. 4) World Super Super Power , India , begged for a permanent UNSC seat for over 30+ years. Nobody listened for over 30+ years since 1994 and each UNSC permanent member took turns to veto against India Source1 : JSTOR Title of article: INDIA'S PERMANENT MEMBERSHIP OF THE U. N. SECURITY COUNCIL : CHANGING POWER REALITIES AND NOTIONS OF SECURITY Author: Manoj Kumar Mishra (Indian) What article said specifically: India has been bidding for the permanent membership of the United Nations Security Council since 1994 when India made its intention clear in the General Assembly that it was prepared to bear the responsibility of the permanent membership of the Security Council

[@AtramentousMindframe-ju5fx]

​@@Rav01508Nice try wumao, India paid in dollars and rupees & not through an unreliable currency like Yuan. BRICS couldn't have expanded without Indian approval, it's literally stipulated in the membership rules. Goes to show how rubbish Chinese education system is, that you don't even know that much. As for the UNSC seat. It's designed to keep others away, if China wasn't part of the initial grouping it too would be out now. China begs for participation in many Western led groups and is humiliated always. Also, Altman is literally wrong. There are multiple AI startups making LLM based AI in India. Nice try though. Try somewhere else.

[@foreverDharma]

Jai Shankar ji and the current administration are fantastic on foreign affairs 💯

[@Seymour-d3t]

India needs to form a New club with the Developing countries and get out of the UN.

[@sriranga1000]

As a first step India must stop all contributions UN and its organizations.Recall,peace keeping forces Call for a meeting of Afro Asian and South American nations excluding Pakistan and China. explore the possibility of forming UNO of ASAA ie Asia ,South America and Africa Further more those want to members of this new organisation must resign their membership in present UNO

[@fredericksiong8240]

Love seeing Palki calling out US hypocrisy for a change...👍😁😁

[@anandb3514]

Permanent Members = Members who will still stay in the group even after everyone else have left.

[@GTASAnShorts-cd4tj]

Global South should form UNSC alternative and should join BRICS

[@merrick6484]

No one in BRICS has Veto power, its more fair.

[@GTASAnShorts-cd4tj]

@@merrick6484 absolutely and BRICS policy nobody can sanction. Its more and better economic group rather than wasted political group unlike Nato, UN, UNSC etc so called international groups.

[@trandyz2521]

If U.S support democracy how does 1 veto nullify 14 votes? That's U.S style 😂😂😂

[@phillipchan6919]

Nobody says the UN is a democracy. The UN is diversity that favors democracy.

[@trandyz2521]

@@phillipchan6919 wow, favour democracy, wow, diversity? How many European members? Then that kind of diversity is stylish, how Africa was represented in a very diverse world... That's diversity at it's finest

[@phillipchan6919]

Looks like India is crying about UNSC Permanent membership again. 😂😂

[@AshutoshSingh-bw7hi]

China got a UN security council permanent seat because our first foolish and womanizer of a prime minister thought that Indians and Chinese are brothers in arms. So that useless prime minister gave up that membership to China. So go back to your history books and read about it.

[@subhadeep129]

Go back to bat eating, ccp bot

[@Anwesha-in-India]

UNSC suffers from red-tapism and used by P5 for self vested interest. From NAM to present, India has come a long way and positioning in the fluid world with South south will help unite together against the UNFCCC, WTO, UNSC, USTR report and so on. More power to our 'Indian way' and Palki ma'am!

[@mxolisizuma2511]

UN should just take their permanent membership and use it in their toilets, we have something better including our minerals ohh and thank you very much president JG Zuma for BRICS for paving the way for us South Africans we don't need the so called UN they need us.

[@manojkarunakaran8604]

The Global south should form it's own forum and exit the UN. India should lead. Russia Brazil South Africa will definitely support.

[@ashwathvinay]

3:56 Deputy to vice overlord of purchasing 😂😂😂 Palki’s subtle humour

[@simbac9991]

It's time for the global majority to create their own UN-style body to manage their own affairs independent of the West & their disfunction. Multipolarity is here!

[@jagadishbhatta9562]

It is time to quit UN and create a grouping that really works. I seriously don't understand why is India so keen for UN permanent seat. Without any permanent seat at UN we are doing pretty good.

[@ShitSkinsIndian]

Beggars can't be choosers.

[@seenuvas1472]

​@@ShitSkinsIndianwe are not discussing about you

[@xnz6525]

after reading hundreds of comments I am happy to see Indian will quit UN ......tomorrow. but they never do what they said.

[@cokycoffee5882]

🙏🏻🙏🏻❤️/ F. Firstpost

[@carvalhoconrad]

Asia should have its own United Nation of Asia.

[@xnz6525]

agree, but Indians are not Asians.

[@vijisxyz]

" Nothing in this world is permanent" !!! 🤣🤣😂😂🤣🤣😂😂

[@jasonhe626]

You have power, you don't needthe UN to accept.

[@danielkudo4800]

India, Indonesia, South Africa, Nigeria, Egypt, Brazil should be permanent UNSC with veto power

[@User_Id479]

Only India🇮🇳 & Brazil🇧🇷 carry global weight

[@danielkudo4800]

@@User_Id479 For the next few years, Indonesia and Nigeria are expected to surpass Brazil in terms of economic power. There should be equitable representation based on geography and demography. India, as the most populous country, the largest Hindu-majority nation, a representative of South Asia, and an economic giant, should hold veto power. Indonesia, being the largest Muslim-majority country and the economic powerhouse of Southeast Asia, also deserves representation. Nigeria and South Africa represent Africa in terms of both population and economy. Egypt, as a democratic representative of the Arab world, should also be considered for a similar role.

[@M4Matty]

Well said n explained

[@vikramrao6391]

This should have been done 20 years ago.

[@venugopalakrishnavajja7952]

Remove "Veto" power, simple majority system should be in place.

[@diramisu4312]

Other countries should pull out their UN peacekeepers. Let the veto countries do the peacekeeping also.

[@javaremastered1530]

create our own unsc

[@abhijitmishra5654]

cannt be done ist not a simple c;ub or group that can be created over night

[@kimeli]

@@abhijitmishra5654 its useless without power, the UN is as powerful as its members give it.

[@LandGrabbingIndia]

India ought to have a permanent UNSC seat by now if they are really such a superpower country. What they have said/bragged/proclaimed on the internet simply does not mirror their power and influence on the global stage. 🤣 What kind of a superpower is India when it has to resort to begging for a permanent UNSC seat, repeatedly and consistently for over 30+ years, and still hasn't got it? Source: JSTOR Title of article: INDIA'S PERMANENT MEMBERSHIP OF THE U. N. SECURITY COUNCIL : CHANGING POWER REALITIES AND NOTIONS OF SECURITY Author: Manoj Kumar Mishra (Indian) What article said specifically: India has been bidding for the permanent membership of the United Nations Security Council since 1994 when India made its intention clear in the General Assembly that it was prepared to bear the responsibility of the permanent membership of the Security Council. First time doing it, we called it asking. Second time, appealing. Third time, pleading. Many times, begging

[@Onlyjorge382]

They won’t ever allow India, Japan and Germany they would. What they should do is have an Asian security council or pan Asian/African security council with a founding law that attack on one is an attack on all.

[@mukundha7621]

Truth

[@hasanmh5557]

Basically, no "Veto" for India but they are welcome as "yes sir" participatants 😅

[@weird_philosopher]

Neither for any of your G hadi countries... 😅

[@weird_philosopher]

G hadi countries won't even be permanent members...

[@merrick6484]

Germany, Japan and India are the same, too weak to make any difference on world stage.

[@hasanmh5557]

@weird_philosopher You seem to be missing the whole point. Nobody takes the UN seriously; it's 2024. Just ask Russia 🇷🇺 if they care about the US or any UN nonsense 😅

[@subhadeep129]

​@@hasanmh5557neither does india , Abdul. You're missing the point. She is pointing out the hypocrisy of the western nations.

[@Nsibidiimohtep-pf9gh]

Yeah

[@isshiomi6364]

Best solution....

[@0xsunil]

"Deputy to the Vice Overlord of Purchasing." Oh dear lord, that's definitely powerful post.

[@Nhial-n9n]

There should be no country that have veto power.this is just ridiculous

[@kimeli]

veto power is the reason why there is no WW3.

[@notarmchairhistorian7779]

Veto power should be by majority vote. Ridiculous.

[@shivakumarv301]

Every country rich and poor should follow rule and regulations not hurt without reason

[@solblaze9533]

Better to make a new UN council non of the 5 members should be allowed there.

[@drmitalukdar]

We need part 3 of the World War, I haven't watched the previous seasons. Hope the next season will be good and give Veto powers to all

[@sureshvarma6060]

india should form its own UN

[@abdulwahaballibhai4727]

No one should have veto rights. Majority vote should rule. The UN was set up to serve the West.

[@vinniche]

Divide and Rule of the Christians of Britain to Christians of US.

[@anujchaudhary1302]

There should not be any veto

[@merrick6484]

UK once runs a common wealth empire, where the sun never set. France once rules 1/3 of Africa and other parts of the world until recently. Russia/ Soviet Union once run the entired Soviet Block. China has biggest population in human history until 2023, and the founding civilisation of Far East. USA modern day super power. All 5 were undisputed at least when United Naions were form. Anyone of the 5 has the power to change the course of human kind.

[@redfiretreesviewonindia8684]

It's quite amusing when people use 'democracy' to judge a country like China, but they never ask why not a single company in the world runs its business democratically. Doing so would surely lead to bankruptcy. The same goes for the UN; it doesn't operate as a democracy either.

[@JHenry906]

It's just their coping mechanism while they are far behind compared to China's National development. Endiots like to create their own happiness. ,😂

[@samuelmakhetha7209]

President cyril Ramaphosa, dear Sir, we don't want the veto power, but we do want to leave both ICC and UN. However BRICS is the future for us and the entire global South.

[@JnanBani]

We the International Community want India 🇮🇳 be a new permanent member.

[@Kevin-fq3zh]

you dont speak for the international community

[@DharmicWarfare]

Yes we do dykhead. 4/5 in 10 years world wide will be Indian so we do. ​@@Kevin-fq3zh

[@Rumble2024injungle]

As a leader of internasional community, i wish Africa union get a permanent seat at unsc

[@alex.2492]

Tell me you are Indian without telling me you are Indian lol

[@DharmicWarfare]

@@alex.2492 tell me your a white colonial gammon without telling me that

[@LandGrabbingIndia]

If India is so unhappy with the UNSC, they should withdraw from the UN completely and form their own Indian security council with the rest of the world. It would be interesting to see how many countries are willing to withdraw/rescind their UN membership or their UN permanent membership in favor of the Indian security council membership : )

[@RaptorsParadise]

Thank Mr Nehru for giving away that seat to China to become an unsc permanent member 🎉🎉

[@VinodBandari-ps5yd]

his great grandson is weaken indias unity and u r talking about joining a elite club 😢

[@许义-f9u]

I could have been a super rich man, but I gave this opportunity to Anthony

[@ze9947]

What kind of IQ can say this sentence? When the United Nations was founded, where was India? India was not a country yet. China was the victor of World War I and World War II. The original signatories of the Declaration of the United Nations The original 26 signatories were: the United States, the United Kingdom, the Soviet Union, China, Australia, Belgium, Canada, Costa Rica, Cuba, Czechoslovakia, the Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Greece, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, India, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Norway, Panama, Poland, the Union of South Africa, and Yugoslavia. Subsequent signatories The countries that subsequently signed the Declaration of the United Nations are (in order of signing date): Mexico, the Philippines, Ethiopia, Iraq, Brazil, Bolivia, Iran, Colombia, Liberia, France, Ecuador, Peru, Chile, Paraguay, Venezuela, Uruguay, Turkey, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Lebanon Find out where India is by yourself. India was not a country at that time On October 25, 1971, the 26th session of the United Nations General Assembly adopted the draft resolution proposed by 23 countries including Albania and Algeria with an overwhelming majority of 76 votes in favor, 35 votes against, and 17 abstentions, deciding to "restore all rights of the People's Republic of China, recognize the representatives of her government as the only legitimate representatives of China in the United Nations, and immediately expel the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek from the seats illegally occupied by it in the United Nations and all its affiliated agencies A simple fact is that among the five countries of the United Nations, China and the Soviet Union each sacrificed more than 20 million soldiers and civilians in World War II. The purpose of establishing the United Nations is not for the peace of those small countries, but to ensure that there will be no more wars between these five countries.

[@phillipchan6919]

Good job Nehru. 👏 Thank you. 👍

[@watercutterlan1401]

@@phillipchan6919 it is so funny to hear an Indian talk about Nehru giving up the permanent seat to China as a Chinese

[@vikasanandame]

Deputy to the overlord of purchasing 😂😂

[@theblackelephant]

I love Indian Media companies

[@redfiretreesviewonindia8684]

any country that is not happy with the UN should feel free to leave,

[@VinodBandari-ps5yd]

totally, agree and india has start demonstrating that by lowering its participation 😂

[@nandans2506]

American democracy in a nutshell

[@raghuveerdendukuri1762]

It is to be considered obsolete already

[@freedom3040]

BRICS should build its own UN

[@wenfulin]

Indian is very jealous for the great powers with the veto powder in UN. I believed that Indian needs to develop its national strengths deeper and stronger before jump on the permanent seat.

[@vanderboii2202]

Hu Wumao bot! India did cede the UNSC seat to Han fundamentalists of China. Well jealous? Then give up and concede. Nothing moe jealous than han clones of China!

[@inverselattice]

There has to be another UN altogether comprising of the nations that matter to most of the planet's population. The rest like ICJ, IPCC, or UNSC should follow the same suit. There can't be two ways about it. The UN should also be discredited to make way for the alternate alliance to shape up.

[@AbuSayyaf963]

The veto comes from strength, not elections

[@LandGrabbingIndia]

Beggars can't be choosers. If you are a top dog, everyone listens when you bark. If you are a slum/caste/beggar dog, everyone ignores when you bark.

[@truthfinder8652]

don't forget that India had its chance to get Veto and its neighbors would've never been this kind of a big problem as they're right now..

[@vipstervipster5002]

Africa, India and others should leave the UN and form their own Democratic Alliance of Nations. They can then deal with any regulations coming out of UN not having to comply with any UN resolution. This will give Africa, India and others equal rights to call the shots . With so many Nations leaving UN, UN will have no legitimacy and next to zero authority.... Problem solved for the world with totally out of control the current permanent members...

[@hardiksumera5567]

Yes

[@fix24politics]

Where is equality, in the highest global body!????

[@rikondjakaramata5678]

The Global South must quit the United Nations if Africa and Asia are excluded from the United Nations Security Council with no veto powers.

[@janedhiraj]

No veto, only majority for any decision

[@cmtsreader7245]

I wish not to take India as a permanent member.

[@Game_Gameing_Gamers]

This is like you can have a Gun but don't use it.... 😂😂😂

[@carlomorisset7319]

No veto power, BOYCOTT!!!!

[@vedaprakash1653]

We should not just get out of UNSC but Also stop our army men dying in random country in the name of UN peace keeping force

[@XidhayPa]

THIS VETO POWER TO ONLY FIVE MEMBER IS ABSOLUTELY NOT FAIR.

[@Genocide2024]

Yes abolish the UN and start over.

[@DanielNdlovu-nu6op]

Bricks nations must form their own security council period. Bullies will always be bullies

[@jamesdsangma6356]

Jaishankar has something to say always 😂😂😂

[@korombokaronko7948]

In addition to what the US has proposed, I am asking Russia and China to propose the inclusion of Nigeria, South Africa, Iran and Saudi Arabia in the permanent seat agreement or no deal

[@wepatopatore7675]

Finally she too a break from China 😂 now she talking about the real issue of the world👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿

[@rahulkaneria831]

Looks like you got a break too

[@Jef-Chen]

Jaishanker: India would definitely be a permanent member of the UNSC with veto powers one day Reporter: When? Jaishanker: Next question

[@weird_philosopher]

Uyghur bots of cryna...

[@rajans.]

Here is you CCP Bot 😂

[@Rav01508]

Jai shankar sigma edit reels🎉

[@ArthasX]

Sooon

[@Sandy-rv9tv]

Those tanks mentioned remind of names like Associate Director (for a Unit Manager) Associate Vice President (for a Branch Manager) 😊

[@mohankanakamedala7600]

I think, Global South must strive for abolition of Veto system. Let it be a Democratic organisation.

[@Little-known7]

USA backed the African union to get UNSC permanent seat and I think no P5 nation will be against the African union getting permanent seat in UNSC.

[@anumaj]

Ditch it if veto remains the same, but India must stand by Palestine

[@manofsan]

Veto should be taken away from certain existing Veto-holders and given to some new members.

[@kimeli]

and who will take that away from them?

[@manofsan]

@@kimeli - I hear you, but it's either that or have the current UN be dysfunctional

[@sarahatantra1158]

Thats called democracy of usa ..