T10 USN Lynch - This Ship Seems Pretty Nuts

[@Flamuu]

It's like the T9, except just better at... everything? Twitter: twitter.com/flamuchz Discord: discord.gg/Flamu Stream: www.twitch.tv/flamuu Insta: instagram.com/flamugram/

[@tomhollins5303]

How many destroyer shells does it take to sink a sub in this game? Wargaming: Yes

[@rizkisoekartono454]

It's Les... Nvm they are both dented in their own way

[@dimvssometimes]

and this is not even Surcouf with Lesta's implementation which will be available in dockyard soon. She will just spit 4x2 shells in serial volley before submerging.

[@BumfluffAddlepate]

I love the idea that a fire aboard a submerged submarine wouldn't be near-instant death for the crew.

[@MartialEmperor6344]

Yeh they have french saturation or better than french saturation so that shit really really kicks in

[@randomguypi-uf2jc]

@@BumfluffAddlepate I mean fires on a sub do like 30% of the ship's HP if allowed to burn, they've very dangerous

[@cnw5330]

If I may offer a feedback - Could your videos from Lesta variant of the game have thumbnail images that are distinct style from WG WoWS? Be it different text color, frame style, whatever..

[@Flamuu]

Sure, why not. I always specify Lesta ships in title and/or description, that isn't enough?

[@frankfletcher_1]

​@@FlamuuAverage wows player doesn't read equipment tab lol reading description is too hard

[@cnw5330]

​@@Flamuu Description doesn't show in the list of videos or in playlists.. and ship name in title means very little - given the frequency of ship releases it gets hard to keep track of what's what, unless you've kept track of the news very thoroughly. There was a time when you could name any ship in the game and I'd be able to respond with the relevant stats. Nowadays, I get a ship drop from Satan's crate, and there's a good chance it's one I didn't know even existed.

[@kovacsj7823]

@cnw5330 This exactly happened with me with the Tianjin.

[@Rhamses220]

@@Flamuu what is the Lesta variant of the game? Is that just a different server?

[@Grayson203]

The guns sound so beefy, way better than the typical high pitched ones

[@Krunari]

The guns sound great

[@cnw5330]

I swear we've had similar sounds in some of the event DDs (I'd say the Savage Battles Khaba?)

[@jurijsoklic5026]

17.5 km DD gunboat. At that range you can farm very safe.

[@nightshadedawn]

Kleber with the right build can reach out to 18.9 while having a 4.5 minute speed boost active.

[@zamp7808]

@@nightshadedawn calling 18.9km kleber the "right build" is a strech to say the least.

[@Yukon.72]

@@nightshadedawn lynch with right build will have over 20km range

[@TheGreatBoomy25]

8 second flight time for DD shells to go 16 km is crazy…

[@neilbhalodi8797]

Lynch as the name for a US ship is wild lmfao

[@Flamuu]

It's actually named after William Lynch, a southern flag officer for the Confederate States Navy. I'm not sure if that makes it better or worse.

[@eiresby2344]

Well there is type of ship called 'snow'

[@neilbhalodi8797]

@ oh god for the confederates? even better lol

[@Frigidblood]

Didn't they announce a Confederate flag in the same DevBlog for this ship's announcement? Maybe I'm remembering that wrong.

[@dimvssometimes]

@@Frigidblood the ship in development -- Chancellorsville -- has commemorative flag which is exactly the First national Confederate flag. The DDs` commemorative flag is white with 3 red horizontal stripes, blue circle on them with white star within the circle

[@stalinexpress]

Why does it look like what austin would dream of

[@sushikid1027]

Aside from not being as fast, it looks like everything Khaba used to be

[@ChrisRand-gf7lz]

The fact that Lesta has the ability to still release balanced ships (no smoke, no heal, no engine boost, just DCP, pretty balanced to me) gives me hope that WG may still have an intern locked away in a closet somewhere that knows how to balance the game.

[@MartialEmperor6344]

But an intern has no chance there the balancing guy is the one from world of planes and he still thinks that cvs and subs need more buffs and are very weak

[@sleepygryph]

Watching that sub get balanced felt so good.

[@thematrixredpill]

Attacking that sub was like attacking a serial killer.

[@xixi6253]

damn is it me or theses shells arc lower than petro's freeboard ?

[@phleetofph0gg]

Fastest shells in the game and great arcs too. Think they have improved drag as well but not sure

[@Vladimir-hq1ne]

Now we need a match between USS Lynch vs USS Black... One-one-one.

[@legiran9564]

I'll be waiting for USS Hull instead.

[@twinshark429]

Get those "well done's" prepped boys.

[@Arthion]

Shcherbakov is just T9 Kutuzov. It's another Sverdlov-class cruiser. But you're technically right in that they're cold-war era ships.

[@RJKuta]

Random question but have you used a mod to make your guns sound much better?

[@dorMaler]

i wonder aswell

[@dimvssometimes]

Lesta changed

[@rommel8433]

No it’s real sound

[@RJKuta]

All of his video's the guns sound top notch, I don't have a lot of these ships but can tell the sound quality is much better, got my settings on ultra, is that all it is?

[@MartialEmperor6344]

No this is wht lesta gave guns upto I think 190 mm of caliber guns

[@fredrikeriksson5199]

Vart är skeppsmuseumet? :)

[@vipinnair1991]

So both Marceau and Elbing have been powercrept in one go?

[@jakubslavik5595]

Looks like a Khaba that's straight up better at everything.

[@TuomasTykkimäki]

Finnish warships have DALEK mounted as turret? (0:52-0:54) 😁

[@1338Sunshine]

What resource will this ship be made available for?

[@MartialEmperor6344]

Tech tree

[@MartialEmperor6344]

Hogg maffit and lynch I think

[@YTPartyTonight]

Interesting. An American post-WWII DD with such advanced guns and turrets looks odd with a flush deck hull.

[@klmnts]

17.5km range is kinda spicy as well

[@UmbraFaux]

What is with that dispersion

[@werauchimmer6214]

shima fat finger smoked at the beginning?

[@mathys406]

what's the caliber ?

[@PigPissBeUponThem]

.g00d-enuf

[@Eissen_meteor]

what the difference with Maffitt?

[@MartialEmperor6344]

Well it's a tech tree continuation I think ... maffit, lynch and Hogg

[@Eissen_meteor]

@MartialEmperor6344 i thought it's premium. nice info

[@mikefoxtrot1157]

Is this T10 Clemson?

[@hakunijun3359]

This thing seem to have quesionable accuracy for a DD

[@Terminator-mj5sb]

17.5km range on a gunboat dd lmao what were they thinking

[@NguyenThanh-gs5zv]

Lynch is way better than Gearing, strong torps (Lynch have 12 compare to 10 on Gearing) and absolute nutty guns (based on Type F 5"/70 high velocity gun project).

[@kukajin9560]

hey, ive only recently come back to WoWS cant find much info about what most mean by lesta when i google or look on reddit. is it just the new company that owns WoWS or only the RU server or a seperate game / modded client i cant figure it out because i see these cool ships and cant find info about them lol i probably just live under a rock

[@xmlthegreat]

It's the Russian server version since the 2022 war caused WG to split from Russia.

[@Anetha_Giliath]

Wow... this Castilla Player failed ...

[@Pavlovsobaka]

US OP ship released - awesome Russian OP ship released - Russian bias

[@tsuaririndoku]

Now, I want to make a conversation on how to Rework a CV. Right now I felt like CVs doesn’t get enough punishment compared to RTS ones. And RTS isn’t that good either. So I want to see how do we, community make changes to how to Balance a CV where it feels fair on both sides and somewhat historical accurate. I’m said on Sealord’s comments before but I realized my idea is too favor the Surface Fleet too much to the point that Yamato can make CVs unable to play the game. Let’s make a perfect CV rework. So I’ll give a proposal on my ideas first. 1) Make CVs have limited aircrafts back in the game. This is to punish CVs who always going to waste their planes. It also fair and more rewarding to Ships that able to shot down Aircrafts. And with the IQ of players in this game. It will pretty much fix the CVs. But For experienced players it isn’t give them enough punishment on making mistakes. 2) All Dual Purpose counted as Flaks. This is an Idea that I have from Naval Art where all dual purpose guns that either Secondaries or Main Batteries can be use as AA guns. By pressing “O” makes your AA into all AA mode. It has infinite duration and it makes non secondary ships can find some use on these secondaries. However, there’s a downside. If you use all AA mode your Dual Purpose guns will never attack surfaced ships. For example, San Diego have Main Battery as Dual Purpose guns. When you activate all AA mode, Sandy will unable to use main battery to shoot surface ships. All Flaks will be counted based on how much Dual Purpose guns are there. 1 Flak = 1 Barrel. So for example, Iowa have 10 dual purpose turrets and each turret have 2 barrels. You have 20 Flaks (10 Flaks on each side). Dual purpose guns on Iowa have the maximum range of 8km. If you don’t activate your all AA mode, Flak will not going to work. So it is basically a risk surface ships you have to take when fighting CVs. Yes, when I said all Dual Purpose, I meant any guns that are historically used to shoot aircrafts. Means Yamato can press all AA and make all of her guns not target surface ships. USN would eating good on this because it doesn’t have much of a trade off when using all AA guns. Flak range also based on caliber and how it able to go historically. Yamato 46cm AA guns have maximum range of 10km. Each flaks does a lot of damage and each caliber have different explosion radius. Yamato 46cm Type 3 will only do 200 damage per hit. But, Flak explosion of Type 3 will damage entire squadrons. Flak reload also share the same reload as respective guns. Means Yamato 460 will reload at 30 seconds and it will reload 30 seconds when targeting air. Or a cracked up Schlieffen 105mm secondaries will target air with 2.7s reload. Basically any secondaries that have insane reload will have better flak coverage. But these flaks will also have worse dispersion the faster it shoots. DFAA will also improve your Flak reload by 50% 3) Flak Explosion cause penalty. When Aircraft get hit by Flak Explosion, it will cause a penalty to your aircrafts. Like worse dropping dispersion. Make your Torpedo drops a lot worse. If you can avoid it just dodge. It’s CVs turn to get this treatment. 4) remove heals from Aircrafts. It is dumb to make Pilots fixing their aircraft mid fight. This is not BFV. 5) Attack Aircrafts will be able to attack enemy aircrafts. It is stupid for CVs not to have a Controlable fighters I think CV vs CV interaction should be more dynamics. Yes, this also makes Attack Aircrafts a lot more useful than Diddy the DDs. But becareful, Fighters can attack another Fighters. If you lose those squadrons enemy CVs will gain air superiority. To make sure you still have a slight chance to self defense all bombers can use Tail guns to fight back Attack Aircrafts. 6) remove Fighter and Scout consumable but replace with Reconnaissance Aircrafts as a working plane. Surface ships must control the plane manually. Yes, You any catapult on surface ships can now work as Hybrid. These things can be deploy with limited numbers of them. It can stay in the air for 3 minutes. Recon Aircrafts will be able to work as a little Fighter on enemy CVs or be a spotter. Recon aircrafts are slower than other Aircrafts in the game and spotting on enemy ships will always does Minimap spotting. While in control you can switch back to surface ships while the aircraft is in the air by pressing Mouse 3. Recon will work as spotter. Bungo will not get this treatment and nothing will changes on her part. Continuous damage will have zero changes hence the flak already does most of the work.

[@Cat_in_The-Box]

This is dogshit

[@MartialEmperor6344]

Which will all be ignored by WG cause the balancing guy of WG thinks that cvs and subs are too weak and need more buffs look at shinano and archerfish

[@tsuaririndoku]

@@Cat_in_The-BoxThen do you have any idea how to balance them?

[@Cat_in_The-Box]

@tsuaririndoku yes but typing it out is a waste of time, WG will never do that. I wish they were balanced so I could use them. Your idea is a lot of work and it makes them unplayable so might as well just delete them.

[@MartialEmperor6344]

@@tsuaririndoku look I will say that ships that have dfaa or ships that WG says have good AA should be no fly zones ..ships like Jinan,minotaur,Worcester etc like bear with me on this .wht I mean is that tech tree line ships or premiums that have actually good enough aa should be at least made strong enough aa wise that at least on their flank cv planes can't fly that would really be a balancing factor there I mean there are BBs having good aa for wht aa is nowadays and also some dds

[@eiresby2344]

Yesterday i watch the T9 and this ship looks better, i want it just to dakka dakka in WG server