The video claims the AV-8A saw action in Vietnam... I would like yo see the references for this as I have never seen any indication that Harriers were used during the Vietnam conflict.
@Daffmeister187 Жыл бұрын
That emergency landing without the front gear must've been nerve-wracking, was getting some sweaty palms just watching that. Impeccable landing too, he should be proud of that.
@a.r.t.4611 Жыл бұрын
The video didn't mention how successful the Harrier was in the Falklands war..
@RoyalTurnips7 ай бұрын
As a brit, the US harrier II and the Original UK harrier are quite different beasts. The UK harrier was developed in the 60s and is very primitive compared to the US harrier II. its like comparing a mig 21 to a mig 29.
@redlock4004 Жыл бұрын
The "engines" don't tilt (0:21). First there is only one engine and it has nozzles that tilt.
@paulwest54028 ай бұрын
Absolutely correct, I used to build these aircraft
@ryokokirchhoff782 Жыл бұрын
This is my bird...I saw this aircraft at the airshow long time ago and this bird bowed down right in front of me and I was totally in love!!!!! 😘😘😘
@grahamdyke6612 Жыл бұрын
Sorry it's not Hawker Sid-a-lay, it's Hawker Siddeley lol. Like everything brilliant in aviation it starts out British and we end up giving it away, or scrapping it. I spent the duration of the Falklands war in 1982 working on repair schemes for the Pegasus engine at the RR Rodney works in Filton Bristol England, happy days :-)
@domainmojo21629 ай бұрын
The Tomcat's trusty wingman- and friend to groundtroops everywhere! What a magnificent, beautiful, powerful and legendary piece of machinery!
@garymiller5937 Жыл бұрын
Very awesome aircraft! 😊
@charlesbarbour2331 Жыл бұрын
I used to work for Hawker Sid-del-lay. Sad that it became part of BAe
@paulwest54028 ай бұрын
Yep, so did I, done my apprenticeship there….
@jacoblahr Жыл бұрын
Reminds me of Grand theft auto San Andreas. When i found that jet in the game i was stoked!
@SidikinnerChannel2 ай бұрын
awesome,,, first jet vertival take off and landing...
@allandavis8201 Жыл бұрын
OMG, @ 0:26 and the first bit of incorrect information, the “Engines tilt downward”……….WRONG, the exhaust nozzles rotate around the engine to direct the jet thrust at a desired angle to achieve the desired speed and direction of flight, and they only have ONE engine, NOT engines.
@muppetrowlf1473 Жыл бұрын
Yeah. And the front nozzles deliver bypass cold air. The rear nozzles deliver hot exhaust gasses. The engine also provides pressure air to the RCS jets.
@R_McGeddon117 Жыл бұрын
The Argentinians called it the 'black death'
@geneappeal9 ай бұрын
The Harriet just looks more menacing than an F35B. It resembles a very large nasty hornet. I'm sure it scared the pants off of a lot of enemy combatants.
@johnswick4593 Жыл бұрын
VTOL are awesome!
@xx648911 ай бұрын
The wind down of that engine after touchdown is awesome
@RetiredSailor60 Жыл бұрын
Had Harriers on USS Wasp LHD 1 during my last deployment in 2002.
@allgood67606 ай бұрын
Awesome plane.. we have a GR-3 Harrier in a museum here in NZ 👍✈️🇳🇿
@karinnathompson5836 Жыл бұрын
These will be my babies forever. 71B Gun Goddess for life. Semper Fi '00-'08
@mikesmnell414 Жыл бұрын
I wish we would get a harrier 3 or an upgrade so it could last a few more decades
@grahamevans8567 Жыл бұрын
Great video , thanks
@hubschenk16528 ай бұрын
Before the F-35B, the HARRIER was the only VTOL fighter jet used by an air force. VTOL takeoffs require a lot of energy due to the weight of an armed fighter jet and therefore a lot of fuel, which increases the weight even further. This reduces either the flight time or the weapons load carried. This is why the English Harriers and F-35Bs usually take off from aircraft carriers in STOL mode (with a short run-up distance), as this reduces fuel consumption during take-off. The HARRIER was also very successful in the Falklands War and English pilots were usually able to win fights against the Argentinian MIRAGE-III. The USA also built a Harrier version. Although there had been several VTOL fighter aircraft before, including some rocket-powered interceptors towards the end of WW2, this was abandoned after the prototype (Viper) crashed, in which the pilot died. In the Soviet Union, Yakovlev also developed prototypes of VTOL jets (YAK-36/38/141) and in France, Marcel Dessault developed the Mirage IIIV as a VTOL interceptor. However, all of these aircraft either never made it past the prototype stage and were abandoned or (in the case of the Yak) were taken out of service after a short time.
@markuspemler3489 Жыл бұрын
The AV-8A flew in Vietnam? When, during the french invasion or with the japanese??.😊
@Dustyscorner1111 Жыл бұрын
Neither, it entered service around the Vietnam war, the script writers are just stupid 😂
@AA-xo9uw Жыл бұрын
Listen again. The video didn't say that it was used in Vietnam only that it was deployed during the war - not to the war zone - which it was. "3:01 the av-8a saw a steady stream of action 3:03 as it was deployed during the Vietnam 3:05 war"
@fcruzdj2 Жыл бұрын
Living on base in MCB Camp Lejeune, I loved watching these bad boys in flight. ❤
@CC-Equipment Жыл бұрын
Grate US AV-8B Harrier show
@MarcosDelgado-e3x9 ай бұрын
TOP...SHOW.BRINDADO.
@amorosogombe9650 Жыл бұрын
Could it take off vertically with a weapons load?
@mtkoslowski Жыл бұрын
Not at all. It must be very light for vertical takeoff.
@mysteryY2K Жыл бұрын
@@mtkoslowski wait, then whats the point? little confused lol
@mtkoslowski Жыл бұрын
@@mysteryY2K It depends on the air temperature and density altitude and elevation. With this information you make a decision to takeoff with a reduced weapons load. If you want to have drop tanks that factors in. For full ordnance you need a long runway.
@AA-xo9uw Жыл бұрын
@@mtkoslowski "Not at all."(sic) Incorrect. Payload was limited when a vertical launch was performed but the aircraft could in fact lift off with a small weapons load.
@AA-xo9uw Жыл бұрын
@@mtkoslowski "For full ordnance you need a long runway."(sic) Incorrect. MTOW can be performed after a relatively short ground run.
@davidmoore8857 Жыл бұрын
Why does the UK always 'retire' kit like this, then US buys it and keeps it going indefinitely? The B-52s are due for new engine - how old are those planes?
@GB-vn1tf Жыл бұрын
Because our governments don't understand the value of equipment like this. They've a habit of thinking they're saving money then having to spend billions to replace the capability later. The Vulcans that bombed the runway on the Falklands were about to be scrapped and we struggled to get them able to be refuelled in flight to achieve it. However, that was the first time the UK actually used any of our weaponry in combat since the 1950s Suez 'incident'. It wasn't until the Gulf War we again needed our aircraft. Unfortunately our governments don't have the money for defence but will use it to bribe the people to vote for them while creating a socialist country. Just as Biden is doing to you now. The debt he's created will hurt yoyr country for a very long time I'd expect.
@muppetrowlf1473 Жыл бұрын
It was retired to pay for EUROFIGHTER/Typhoon. A jet that had spiralling costs. And back then was 10 years late in service. Which accelerated the cost overrun even further. It continues to be expensive to operate in service. So much so there are only one third of them flying compared to the RAF original order. The Harrier was a World beater. The Typhoon can’t even recoup its cost in foreign sales. It’s currently being outsold by the brilliant Dassault Rafale.
@Jack-bs6zb Жыл бұрын
Those B52s will receive modern Rolls Royce engines to keep them in a useful state.
@HamzaLock12 Жыл бұрын
Alpha jet french ممكن لها ان تكون على هذا الشكل بنفس الحجم
@barrysrcdump3557 Жыл бұрын
What about it's service during the Falklands War? 🤷♂️🤦♂️
@AA-xo9uw Жыл бұрын
The Harrier II wasn't used during the Falklands skirmish.
@-rp2pg Жыл бұрын
@@AA-xo9uwthe only difference was a more modern Radar etc but the basic design of the aircraft was British and the VTOL system and engines always were British
@michaelfreeze2949 Жыл бұрын
Arnold Schwarzenegger new how to fly a harrier in the movie True Lies
@WakeMarine Жыл бұрын
Fly by wire? Nobody told me. lol
@shanepatrick4534 Жыл бұрын
Those engines pretty much eat themselves during that last hover.
@mtkoslowski Жыл бұрын
It’s a single engine aircraft.
@shanepatrick4534 Жыл бұрын
@@mtkoslowski My fault, I knew it has a Single Rolls Royce Pegasus. They still operate at dangerous levels whilst hovering.
@mtkoslowski Жыл бұрын
@@shanepatrick4534 True. Did you know that they also carry 150 gallons of water? Not for cooling but for injecting into the turbine to increase performance?
@shanepatrick4534 Жыл бұрын
@@mtkoslowski Yup, at those temps the water breaks down and helps increase thrust. I got the Harrier simulator as a kid in '86 and learned all about it.
@muppetrowlf1473 Жыл бұрын
It does stop the blades melting also.
@scottlink183 Жыл бұрын
I read that the harrier is one of the more difficult attack aircraft to fly.
@MSaleh-vy8rr Жыл бұрын
Call Of Duty: Black Ops 2 was set in the year 2025, and they had the FA38, fictional jet inspired by the F35 lighting ii.
@pmarmify Жыл бұрын
no mention on how it show down Argentinian warplanes in the Falklands conflict
@AA-xo9uw Жыл бұрын
The AV-8B wasn't used during the Falklands conflict.
@glastonbury4304 Жыл бұрын
@AA-xo9uw ...the British variant did, the Harrier is a British plane, however the AV8B and Harrier II were an Anglo American collaboration
@macjim Жыл бұрын
Pronounced sid-lay… not sid el a
@WAYNENYC100 Жыл бұрын
least we forget that the govenemnt is over charged for replacement parts. 300.00 for a 3.00 part.
@rogerbeck1293 Жыл бұрын
Dreadful act of treachery when PM cameron scrapped them just as we built an aircraft carrier that had no planes. We should buy this version.
@俊宏陳-u6p Жыл бұрын
很難學會飛行的飛機。
@delten-eleven1910 Жыл бұрын
It's the Harrier...not the AV8-B Carrier.
@todgertownwhite Жыл бұрын
The US didnt use this aircraft in Vietnam,it was only beginning service in the RAF at the time of Vietnam.The Falklands war was its first operational venture.I wish you Americans would stop laying claim to everything!
@AA-xo9uw Жыл бұрын
"The US didnt use this aircraft in Vietnam," The video didn't say that it was used in Vietnam only that it was deployed during the war - not to the war zone - which it was. "3:01 the av-8a saw a steady stream of action 3:03 as it was deployed during the Vietnam 3:05 war" "it was only beginning service in the RAF at the time of Vietnam."(sic) The AV-8A achieved IOC with the Marine Corps in 1971. "I wish you Americans would stop laying claim to everything!"(sic) I wish that youtube wasn't where intelligence and common sense take a sabbatical.
@leaningr Жыл бұрын
If it wasn’t for Americans, your country probably wouldn’t even exist
@Austin-cx2xe Жыл бұрын
Claim everything? The only reason the aircraft became a success was because America decided to help develop better version
@karloyu3484 Жыл бұрын
Brits and USA is friends forever.. No need to fight it over.. We both used this in combat missions in war and peace time for patrol.❤💙✌️
@Then.72 Жыл бұрын
@@Austin-cx2xethey didn’t help it and the UK helped the F35B ! The UK sold it because of the government who have destroyed our nation to make themselves richer
@pabloexequielbarrera4105 Жыл бұрын
Hello
@martynevans7659 Жыл бұрын
And while we are on the subject of CREDIT Recognition the P51 mustang only became a total success when the Alinson engine USA was ditched and the Merlin spitfire engine retro fitted and totaly transformed the P51 performance on all levels Little known also the F35 lightening a British name is actually 15 % Uk BAE systems technolgy 😮
@AA-xo9uw Жыл бұрын
"Alinson"(sic) Allison "lightening"(sic) Lightning II after the Lockheed P-38 Lightning not the English Electric Lightning.
@meirionowen5979 Жыл бұрын
Anyway, The Merlin spitfire engine beefed the darn P51 mustang.
@jonwood8648 Жыл бұрын
and throw in some russian via the yak licenced engine vectoring tech
@northernironkennels23457 ай бұрын
@@jonwood8648no connection between yak and harrier there is however between the f35 and the yak
@MrJdebest Жыл бұрын
Still being used ? Never mind I'll watch the video 😮
@jerrym1070 Жыл бұрын
We ended up with a bunch through a bargain from what I recall learning a few weeks ago . Still watching RN too ... shhhhh
@AA-xo9uw Жыл бұрын
The Marine Corps will continue to operate the AV-8B until mid 2029.
@jerrym1070 Жыл бұрын
I won 1 of these drinking Pepsi
@wadeking Жыл бұрын
Yes!!!
@joezeed-g4h11 сағат бұрын
Hallo It is jetfighter don't pilot sir.
@christopherpinnock7900 Жыл бұрын
Thank you barrier for your service🇬🇧🇺🇦
@AnTiThesis-HaT-HoT10 ай бұрын
She said “Hairier”.
@JoshGibson-fb7mf Жыл бұрын
Here after playing MW2
@alanstewart8216 Жыл бұрын
Hawker Siddelay. 😂
@martynevans7659 Жыл бұрын
The Harrier also squared away 4 French mirage jets in The Falklands conflict One pilot downed 3 himself
@AA-xo9uw Жыл бұрын
Incorrect. Two Mirage IIIEAs were downed during the Falklands skirmish. One from Grupo 8 FAA on 1 May by RAF Flt Lt Barton flying an 801 Squadron SHAR using an American AIM-9L Sidewinder. The second also from Grupo 8 FAA during the same engagement was damaged by an AIM-9L fired by RN Lt. Thomas in an 801 Squadron SHAR only to then be shot down by Argentine AAA over Stanley.
@karloyu3484 Жыл бұрын
💙👍
@edwardfletcher7790 Жыл бұрын
It's "Sid lee" not "Siddle eh" jeeez
@michaelmazowiecki919510 ай бұрын
Incompetent commentary.
@voodookingz Жыл бұрын
Ai generated content
@hyperstroll9642 Жыл бұрын
Remember when the Terminator few this shit?
@martynevans7659 Жыл бұрын
Trust the Yanks to take the credit for this British innovation and can't even pronounce Hawker Sidley correctly What an insulting video clip and the Harrier was also not used in Afganistan either the Jaguar and Tornado was the first British and the tornado Anglo German and Italian
@AA-xo9uw Жыл бұрын
The Harrier II was not a British invention. The UK abandoned the McDonnell Douglas redesign of the original Harrier from 1975-1981 returning only after the overwhelming majority of the work had been completed and Thatcher had become PM. Additionally, were it not for the substantial funding provided by the US taxpayer via the MWDP the Kestrel/Pegasus/Harrier likely wouldn't have made it past the drafting table after Duncan Sandys and the MoD refused to fund their development. The Brits had a lot of financial and technical help that people like you refuse to acknowledge
@muppetrowlf1473 Жыл бұрын
Not technical help. Purely financial. The main reason TSR2 was cancelled. Because we were using American money to fund it and then trying to sell it to countries interested in the F-111. If I’d have been American that would have pissed me off.
@kasirmir1925 Жыл бұрын
Tech stolen from the Russian Yak fighter jet.
@edwardfletcher7790 Жыл бұрын
Don't be daft.... LoL
@kasirmir1925 Жыл бұрын
@Edward- do your homework 👍🏻
@edwardfletcher7790 Жыл бұрын
Do I really need to lay out the obvious facts ? The design requirements of the Harrier date back to 1957, the Yak 38 was a low budget copy of the 1965 Hawker Siddeley P.1154. The first Harrier flew in 1967 ! The rubbish multi engine Yak 38 didn't even fly till 1971 !!!
@stevenwood7347 Жыл бұрын
Don't be stupid
@AA-xo9uw Жыл бұрын
Incorrect. The thieves masquerading as engineers at the copyski design bureau Yakovlev stole "their" tech from the US, Brits, Germans and French.
@Bren39 Жыл бұрын
Maybe the least capable airplane in the last 50 years. This stol/vertical take off is a big gimmick... Why? Cannot do vertical takeoff with full combat weight and fuel. Slow. Nothing special. A 30 year old f16 will smoke this thing before the pilot of this thing gets his bearing.
@AA-xo9uw Жыл бұрын
How much experience did you acquire serving in AV-8B squadrons during Desert Storm, Operation Enduring Freedom, Operation Iraqi Freedom, et al and how is it that Norman Schwarzkopf had a much higher opinion of the Harrier II than a barcalounger cabal member like you?
@muppetrowlf1473 Жыл бұрын
Funny, but absolutely not true. In fighter fit this aircraft in its original form was almost peerless. Many a F-15 and F-16’driver been “smoked” by a Harrier. One ex British pilot explained that it can vector its nose out 70deg while still in stable flight. The only jet that could cope visual range was the F-18. But even then at high Alpha the F-18 had dumped its energy and couldn’t escape the fight through lack of outright power. The Harrier was a brilliant Air Combat fighter…. In the right hands.
@jorgtanzerjo3633 Жыл бұрын
Und ich dachte schon den Harrier bauen die Britten 😂😂😂😂😂
@davidbaker59683 күн бұрын
And we got the enigma box which then was used to win the war at Bletchley park ENGLAND
@davidbaker59683 күн бұрын
Another thing that they said in the 2 ww the captur of a German submarine it wasn't you America but British and yet you made a film saying it was the Americans