can we just appreciate how 6:34 lines up with the music
@cccc56126 жыл бұрын
Applegermblaster OMG I CANT STOP WATCHING
@Que_Drum6 жыл бұрын
And a ad
@communistkoi82256 жыл бұрын
I was thinking the same thing!
@sufipunk186 жыл бұрын
Fvcking hell i spit all over my screen, lmao
@archer10196 жыл бұрын
Applegermblaster Ik the beat was spot on with the banging
@bryanpotts55946 жыл бұрын
"I don't think your arm could achieve sufficient launch velocity for take-off" -- Sickest burn of 2018
@rcpi93366 жыл бұрын
Hey I made the same joke and you got the heart... Hahaha good job :)
@justinambron6796 жыл бұрын
Another way of saying "ur weak" 😂
@lithiumfire96936 жыл бұрын
"I don't think your arm could achieve sufficient launch velocity to achieve flight" lmao the real quote Is somehow funnier
@kreevee83516 жыл бұрын
I saw this comment exactly when i heard it
@antoniomelu37936 жыл бұрын
Oh snap
@Asu016 жыл бұрын
Wish Samm Sheperd is still around. Pretty sure he'd love to watch this kind of video and probably make his own. Fly high amigo, we'll never forget you.
@MCsCreations6 жыл бұрын
❤
@Smt_Glaive6 жыл бұрын
he will be missed!
@mikeupton54066 жыл бұрын
Needed RATO boosters and more cowbell.....
@leemilica6 жыл бұрын
The intro made me shed a tear
@KnowledgePerformance76 жыл бұрын
F
@Grifkilla515 жыл бұрын
i would love to see you get one of colinfurze's pulse jets to fly.
@62tps5 жыл бұрын
Grifkilla51 yes
@gradylucas9365 жыл бұрын
Grifkilla51 or a turboramjet
@deficientduck30035 жыл бұрын
Very flammable. Very cool.
@wade3fly5 жыл бұрын
too heavy, here is a better design. kzbin.info/www/bejne/lZmZdWdtgdCZmdk
@Shalami5 жыл бұрын
If those two collab, the result of whatever project it is would be fucking insaneee
@HUBBABUBBADOOPYDOOP5 жыл бұрын
*Get an oxy-Acetylene oxygen tank, filled to 2,000 psi.* *Attach the wings and tail to it, battery box for servos & transceiver stuff.* *Electric dump valve with nozzle.* *These tanks have been known to launch several hundred feet when the valve* *is suddenly snapped off- due to improper handling & storage.* *At best- you'd have a 50 pound guided missle for 3-5 seconds*
@ljcday5 жыл бұрын
Dear god, what have you’ve done?
@RaRa-uo3eh5 жыл бұрын
Do itttttttt
@Handledgovernment5 жыл бұрын
50 pound? The ones I deal with are more like 190lbs
@Kdotrunn5 жыл бұрын
HUBBABUBBA DOOPYDOOP KZbin is not for science it’s for dumb stuff.
@chrome57255 жыл бұрын
Top Mánager that’s not the point
@Monkeyheadtpc6 жыл бұрын
Wright brothers, 1900: "We'll take a scientific approach using delicate materials and years of hard work to build an airplane." Peter Sripol, 2018: "I will take the least fliey thing I can find and build an airplane from it in two days. Three days tops."
@TheDutchViking6 жыл бұрын
Monkeyheadtpc perfect comment.
@mikedev1016 жыл бұрын
ROFL
@jasonjones63286 жыл бұрын
Don't forget they upgraded their "steeringness"
@TheDutchViking6 жыл бұрын
Jason Jones duly noted.
@somewhatobsessedwithgaming98626 жыл бұрын
Next attempt, fly a plane under brick power.
@JunkyardDigs6 жыл бұрын
Hook a regular propeller up to the output shaft on that gassy boi and let'er rip!
@greggv86 жыл бұрын
Yeah, put a prop on the front of the gas motor shaft for a bit more thrust.
@KlockworXMusic6 жыл бұрын
@@greggv8 I have a weedeater engine with a 20x8 prop on it that pulls hard, never actually put it on anything though but I have heard people converting little 2 smoke engines to run RC planes before. I mean frankly if he wanted to do that he could have the one I have if he pays shipping, more of a multi rotor person myself and won't use that engine in the long run.
@derkeksinator176 жыл бұрын
Yes, stripping a twostroke down to the neccessities and bolting a prop to it is a great way to go. Maybe a lighter flywheel and a better exhaust and slightly advanced timing can further enhance performance, at least for the time being...
@slingshotrc46346 жыл бұрын
@@KlockworXMusic The early large scale planes used slightly modified chainsaw engines.
@djaydeved6 жыл бұрын
alternatively you can use a .5cc mini engine
@MultiHempster5 жыл бұрын
Dude are you using a flexible screwdriver like a regular screwdriver.....that's some kinda living hell
@johnnypaintsticks80275 жыл бұрын
I was baffled.
@suicidalbanananana5 жыл бұрын
Im kinda thinking it helps to prevent overturning the screws, since hes working with fairly soft materials, you dont wanna have the screw just drill a hole because you turned it to far, flexible screwdriver might help prevent that?
@garethbaus54713 жыл бұрын
@@suicidalbanananana unless it has some sort of clutch, I can't imagine it reliabley providing that benefit.
@michaelweston60836 жыл бұрын
0:07 I love your unboxings, and that leaf blower that runs on freedom.
@richardsolomon53755 жыл бұрын
It's a freedom blower!
@renzevenir48536 жыл бұрын
_Unseen footages of North Korea secret air force testing their latest high tech aircraft (DPRK 2018, colorized)_
@MCsCreations6 жыл бұрын
LOL
@momaniasfc6 жыл бұрын
I gotta ask. How do you make it italic
@MCsCreations6 жыл бұрын
@@momaniasfc Just put "_" before and after the text.
@renzevenir48536 жыл бұрын
If you write a meme, the words automatically become either italics or bold thanks to the great KZbin algorithm! No, seriously. Just add underscore at the beginning and the end of the sentence.
@momaniasfc6 жыл бұрын
_YO_
@redfox1295 жыл бұрын
6:33 I like how that matched perfectly with the beat.
@fnersch33675 жыл бұрын
You guys spend so much money and time on these projects. I'm glad you share it with the world. Very inspiring.
@o2amongus2052 жыл бұрын
POV the team up with mr beast
@brotspinne3329 Жыл бұрын
🤣 the money comes from youtube
@pathecat_ Жыл бұрын
@@brotspinne3329 and he spends the money on good videos and to feed him and/or his family
@pseudoalpaca32886 жыл бұрын
"Maybe it'll work right off the bat and we'll be done." - checks length of the video, "nope"
@JunkardCOD6 жыл бұрын
Ah, an man of science... lol did the same
@maxspinks21816 жыл бұрын
Make a leaf blower landing strip of leaf blowers for constant airstream at low speeds
@brycesilk36065 жыл бұрын
Goes to RC plane race Sir that’s a leaf blower with wings
@OldF10005 жыл бұрын
Why yes, yes it is and your point? ; )
@erin53045 жыл бұрын
but he believes in himself
@catfishancrappie98433 жыл бұрын
So it will fly
@williamdowling77185 жыл бұрын
Peter.. You're a Saint for staying so calm after catastrophic crashes.. So much work into the plane just to watch it explode into pieces and you laugh it off and get right back to work rebuilding. Amazing.
@gewoonvideos42154 жыл бұрын
peter from family guy hehehehhehee lewiz
@TheAngryAstronomer6 жыл бұрын
Runs well on .22 stroke.
@finkyfamboni43336 жыл бұрын
@@mattiem7dmv158 Nah man you gotta use .50cal!
@b2spirit356 жыл бұрын
I think 40 mil will work better
@jasonkim67106 жыл бұрын
Better on 357 mate
@finkyfamboni43336 жыл бұрын
@@jasonkim6710 You sure i looked on the side and it said it was .50 stroke!
@jasonkim67106 жыл бұрын
@@finkyfamboni4333lol
@TheRealLifeGuys6 жыл бұрын
Awesome idea! And actually flies better than I would have thought! :D
@nw81296 жыл бұрын
Schön euch hier zu sehen
@creeper077_hd26 жыл бұрын
Ja, auf jeden Fall
@aserta6 жыл бұрын
I had little doubts about it. We did a similar thing in school half a decade ago, if that worked then...it has to be better now. :)
@Justin-ou6gq6 жыл бұрын
Oh its those german guys
@PeterSripol6 жыл бұрын
yep! after playing around with them for a bit I was pretty sure this wasn't going to end well!
@stormsphinxx11656 жыл бұрын
Oooh! Peter said sam’s arm couldn’t reach sufficient launch velocity. Burn!
@fryncyaryorvjink21405 жыл бұрын
"Your arm couldn't achieve sufficient launch velocity to achieve flight" NERD SLAM!!! "Don't you talk crap about MY ultralight!"
@theswartz42185 жыл бұрын
Using too many big words actually makes you sound like you don't know what you are talking about.
@theswartz42185 жыл бұрын
Nevermind. I'm sorry. I should've watched the video first. He actually sounded smart when he said it.
@shanemintz036 жыл бұрын
I'm so glad you uploaded Peter. This week for me has been pretty shitty and I fr needed this. Your videos are legit the best and make me happy as well. Keep up the good work my dude! ✌️
@Kay_213_6 жыл бұрын
Hope your week goes better
@TheHavnmonkey6 жыл бұрын
If any of your creations ever called for a rocket assisted takeoff... this is it!!! Strap some model rocket booster rockets that leaf blower!!!
@genericfakename81976 жыл бұрын
Bigass sugar rockets
@mitch92436 жыл бұрын
That would be cool. A JATO assisted takeoff like the Blue Angels C-130.
@karlt82335 жыл бұрын
Did this one time when I was into 1/2A 2 Channel combat RC. It wirks provided you have a reinforced area to attack the rockets. 1st attempt not so good lol.
@dukecraig24026 жыл бұрын
Are you kidding me? I just spent the past 5 days with a leaf blower strapped on my back and all this time I could have been flying around with it instead of chasing leaves around in my yard.
@codydaman17136 жыл бұрын
hunterharper06 he was joking
@dukecraig24026 жыл бұрын
@@Galaxius2117 Don't ruin my dream, I was hoping to fly away to a place my ex wife can't find me.
@pattio.se176 жыл бұрын
Duke Craig he still doesnt get it
@sugunadevarapally28626 жыл бұрын
Duke Craig aaaaaaaqaaaq
@EggNutGT6 жыл бұрын
hunterharper06 r/whoooosh
@dolphinplayzwot21405 жыл бұрын
Aerodynamics.exe has stopped working.
@BravenR5 жыл бұрын
Unoriginal
@sovietball78685 жыл бұрын
Seems legit
@naomiwolf89445 жыл бұрын
No thrust to weight ratio.exe has stopped working
@hunterwilliams48905 жыл бұрын
It really wasn't the aerodynamics, it's the thrust to weight ratio that needs help
@8ballentertainment.8855 жыл бұрын
With great enough thrust, anything can fly
@OtherTheDave6 жыл бұрын
If the electric leaf blower weighed half as much as the gas one, could you use two of them? The tail boom might need to be a giant Y duct to avoid accidental differential thrust, though, and that seems like it’d be heavy. It wouldn’t account for the differential drag, but I don’t know if that’s an actual problem at these speeds. Maybe mount them vertically instead of side-by-side?
@johnwilcox126 жыл бұрын
Add a large diameter propeller to the starter clutch on the front of the plane (gas blower). Alter the clutch so you can wrap a rope around the outer circumference of it and pull start it without interfering with propeller. Turn the additional rotational force of the crankshaft into thrust with a "Puller prop." Increase main landing gear strut height if necessary for prop to ground clearance.
@jamesbuckley43476 жыл бұрын
Or put prop with a nose cone and use electric starter
@TheWebstaff6 жыл бұрын
What's the chance of us seeing that leaf blower as a water jet in a boat?
@ryankyser52436 жыл бұрын
Dave Webster yes. Great plan.
@ARockyRock6 жыл бұрын
Pretty good. I would like to see him modify it to make more power- maybe figure out how to overcharge it.
@shnek51436 жыл бұрын
@@ARockyRock Why are you trying to be smart? "Overhcharge it"?
@ARockyRock6 жыл бұрын
@@shnek5143 Im no engineer, he can probably replace the motors powering the fans and make more air come out. Overcharge it was my way of saying that.
@axelpatrickb.pingol32286 жыл бұрын
That is plausible given how powerful ICE's are.
@dennishill6762 жыл бұрын
Young man you do not strike me as the type of person that compliments or comments affect negatively. With that being said you’re incredibly talented. I’m older I’m a bit of a tinkerer myself it’s wonderful to see the next generation utilizing the technology they have at hand to make incredible projects. We’ve come a long ways from rubber bands and popsicle sticks lol. Please keep up the work
@TheBeteljuice6 жыл бұрын
Nicely done. I particularly enjoyed your judicious choice of the 24" floppy screwdriver, a must for any aeronautic endeavor.
@That_Cajun_Guy5 жыл бұрын
"let's go fly a leafblower" boy if I had a dollar every time...
@FreeStuffPlease5 жыл бұрын
You could buy another leaf blower 🍃
@theyeetking4845 жыл бұрын
Peter:sees something *makes it fly*
@toko34114 жыл бұрын
So true www
@mrfun32823 жыл бұрын
Peter is like the keltec of rc airplanes. Always doing the weird stuff.
@gamingwithflight6179 Жыл бұрын
Hello fellow gun lover
@GTkoze Жыл бұрын
@@gamingwithflight6179do you mean fellow American??
@natsterjam6 жыл бұрын
Peter, that leaf blower needed tweaking for more output. Suggestions: Remove the head gasket (if the piston doesn't hit the head) for more compression. Check if the carbaretta is restricted and remove anything that retards the throttle linkage (increase the revs). Remove ALL uneccessary weight. Finally ask a petrol head if they have any ideas for increasing the output. Then you wouldn't have to CHEAT and use an electric motor! Good luck on the next try my friend!
@MilesPrower19926 жыл бұрын
Remove the head gasket... I dont think that's how this works.
@natsterjam6 жыл бұрын
@@MilesPrower1992 It Worked on my 50cc motor cycle back in 1988. It was 3 mm thick, I removed it and replaced it with gasket sealant. The bike went from 32mph tops to 46 mph!
@MilesPrower19926 жыл бұрын
@@natsterjam I was under the impression that you were telling him to run it metal-to-metal, no seal at all. Makes sense though.
@brsrc7596 жыл бұрын
Damn I really want you guys to try the gas leaf blower again! I really think you can get it to work if you try to reduce the drag with some kind of lightweight nose cone around the engine and throw away that muffler and get an aluminum one.I'm sure there's more stuff you can cut off that engine as well like a bunch of the cooling fins. No need to stay cool we're just trying to get one quality flight here LOL. Maybe a little more wing possibly as well??
@Stitchsticker6 жыл бұрын
I can imagine someone going out outside and seeing a leaf blower with wings flying around
@masonrunyan53765 жыл бұрын
Like the flying lawn mowers! 😂
@amineoubouaziz81715 жыл бұрын
He'll go back fa sho 🤣
@aberakadabra12855 жыл бұрын
I'd like to see a propeller on that 2stroke blower engine. Strip it down to bear minimum. Straight pipe exhaust & air ram intake , running on premium fuel with naphthalene (moth flakes) high octane ;)
@piratep6 жыл бұрын
. Make a machine using only computer case fans. Maybe a quad copter?
@ignasanchezl6 жыл бұрын
Its hard to open computer fans, but if done correctly you can bypass the IC, connect to the actual motor windings and overdive the motor. If you just put more voltage through the input wires, you would just burn the IC that controls the motor.
@shutdahellup694206 жыл бұрын
i doubt stock pc fan produce enough airflow to take off vertically... let alone battery and frame
@piratep6 жыл бұрын
Y'all seem to forget this man just built a plane out of a leaf blower. Have faith.
@parrotbirb6 жыл бұрын
With server fans* They arr muxh better
@axiom16506 жыл бұрын
Power to weight ratio of a pc fan might not be good enough for a quad copter but a plane might work if the ic is circumvented. Server fans should work out of the box I think.
@kimmer66 жыл бұрын
You get more power out of the gas powered leaf blower if you cuss at it in Spanish.
@lmaolmoo41476 жыл бұрын
Got me
@Cicada-oo7ti6 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂
@jmccormick14906 жыл бұрын
Lmao 🤣
@kimmer66 жыл бұрын
El himno nacional mexicano. La música del soplador de hojas.
@DoktorJeep6 жыл бұрын
Oh you
@robertfield75326 жыл бұрын
"I don't have enough steeringness"
@Kay_213_6 жыл бұрын
“What’s a grammar?”
@ricomotions54166 жыл бұрын
spoken like a true engineer
@Losermachine355 жыл бұрын
Anneal that aluminum before bending and then quench after bending. Also take the leaf blower motor and add a prop.
@thiagov61236 жыл бұрын
maybe its the giroscopic effect of that high rpm engine with a large inertial mass rotating in it thats making it hard to steer.
@alext90676 жыл бұрын
Good thought. But I don't think he know how to fly a plane.
@resih9006 жыл бұрын
alex tworkowski he does you idiot
@lnlyby_yt6 жыл бұрын
Woooow someone took intro physics
@thiagov61236 жыл бұрын
@@lnlyby_yt Dynamics* 6th semester of mechanical Engineering
@pencilspianos84126 жыл бұрын
thiagov6123 // Is it hard?
@GGigabiteM6 жыл бұрын
I think your original gas powered leaf blower would have worked if you used a biplane or triplane design, you just didn't have enough wing area. Early aircraft designers had to work with unbelievably underpowered engines, but they worked because of the huge wing area of biplanes. They may not have flown fast, but they flew.
@Robert-qm7yi6 жыл бұрын
Too much drag, not enough thrust. I'm not an expert or anything but judging by how bad the thrust to weight ratio is adding more wings would only make the problem worse. Yeah you get more lift, but does it matter when you're going too slow for it to matter?
@xtratic6 жыл бұрын
@@Robert-qm7yi The primary advantage of the biplane over a monoplane is to combine great stiffness with light weight. Stiffness requires structural depth and, where early monoplanes had to have this added with complicated extra bracing, the box kite or biplane naturally has a deep structure and is therefore easier to make both light and strong. A braced monoplane wing must support itself fully, while the two wings of a biplane help to stiffen each other. The biplane is therefore inherently stiffer than the monoplane. Also, the structural forces in the spars of a biplane wing tend to be lower, so the wing can use less material to obtain the same overall strength and is therefore much lighter. A disadvantage of the biplane was the need for extra struts to space the wings apart, although the bracing required by early monoplanes reduced this disadvantage. The low power supplied by the engines available in the first years of aviation meant that aeroplanes could only fly slowly. This required an even lower stalling speed, which in turn required a low wing loading, combining both large wing area with light weight. A biplane wing of a given span and chord has twice the area of a monoplane the same size and so can fly more slowly, or for a given flight speed can lift more weight. Alternatively, a biplane wing of the same area as a monoplane has lower span and chord, reducing the structural forces and allowing it to be lighter. Biplanes suffer aerodynamic interference between the two planes. This means that a biplane does not in practice obtain twice the lift of the similarly-sized monoplane. The farther apart the wings are spaced the less the interference, but the spacing struts must be longer. Given the low speed and power of early aircraft, the drag penalty of the wires and struts and the mutual interference of airflows were relatively minor and acceptable factors.
@jakegarrett81096 жыл бұрын
Those early planes had props, which made a huge amount of airflow on the wings (lift). The biplane took extra advantage of that (not double, but a lot more wing area in the props airflow), so they make ridiculous amounts of lift compared to a turbine/ducted design. I've done a jet powered plane, and wow, you really miss having the high air velocity from the props! That's why a normal RC plane can take off from a standstill (lot of lift even stationary). For ducted/jet you only get lift with relative velocity of the plane.
@GGigabiteM6 жыл бұрын
@@Robert-qm7yi Just adding another deck of wing and a few spars won't increase the drag that significantly compared to biplanes back in WW1. In addition to being biplanes, they also usually had significant numbers of bracing wires to hold the plane together. Pusher types like the Airco D.H.2 had it especially bad, the boom that held the tail on behind the fuselage required a ridiculous number of them to keep it structural. Here's a good video on it: kzbin.info/www/bejne/nmXIhXWHfMeleLc
@xtratic6 жыл бұрын
@@jakegarrett8109 True, they had props in front wich helped With the airflow on the wings. But, let's not rule it out simply because it's a turbine/ducted design. It is still Worth a try as the biplane configuration can have lighter wings despite it having two planes, rather than a monoplane configuration where the wings are heavier. The reason i'm voting for the biplane design is because you need less speed compared to the monoplane design in order to achieve lift.
@1one3_Racing6 жыл бұрын
Try a better quality leaf blower, also add less oil to your 2 stroke mix. It will shorten the engine life but it will lean out an rev harder. There are lots of tuning things you can do to the leaf blower to get a little extra power from it. Maybe also different nozzles. I know you wanted it "stock" but I'd rather see a modified leaf blower fly than a stock leaf blower fail....
@boostaddict_6 жыл бұрын
Yep. A better (or none at all) filter, a straight pipe, and a better turbine would make this thing work well.
@ccubsfan946 жыл бұрын
@@boostaddict_ Give it a chamber on the pipe to "supercharge" it.
@dirtrider886 жыл бұрын
using less oil will enrich the mixture. SMH.
@ccubsfan946 жыл бұрын
@@dirtrider88 I was thinking the same thing.
@boostaddict_6 жыл бұрын
@@dirtrider88 The oil is more potent than the gas, so it makes the AFR richer. Less oil means the fuel will be less combustible but ignite faster, because the AFR will be leaner. There would be more gas but the mixture would be leaner. Kinda confusing but if you think about it it makes sense.
@estebanfj80945 жыл бұрын
Dude... You could put a prop in the gas leaf blower... Because when u pull the thingy to start it.. Thats the crank... Obviously that will always be spining when u turn the engine on
@santiagoperez20945 жыл бұрын
Por wat? The idea was a leafblower plane not a two stroke propeller rc plane.
@estebanfj80945 жыл бұрын
@@santiagoperez2094 bro it will still be using the air from the leaf blower ...
@Kevyoso6 жыл бұрын
Peter Spirol ur amazing you never clickbait and fail like other youtubers do. You always do it if you try to do it. This one is amazing.I thought it was impossible but you really did it
@sunkiwunki22303 жыл бұрын
Cool Profile pic
@HappyMadScientist6 жыл бұрын
Could you try taking the governor out for higher RPMs and less weight?
@modelnutty65036 жыл бұрын
leaning out the carb might get a little more RPM
@davidtheawesomeone53586 жыл бұрын
I don’t believe a engine this size and use would have a governor, especially because the carb it’s using
@shutdahellup694206 жыл бұрын
strap on a turbo, nah jk😂
@guitarsplanes6 жыл бұрын
Running it too much faster would probably result in throwing the connecting rod in the engine. (Engine failure)
@shelbybrunhoeber25766 жыл бұрын
THOSE SMALL 2 STROKE ENGINES TYPICALLY DON'T HAVE THEM
@Incadazant016 жыл бұрын
If you're going to use the tricycle configuration, I'd recommend doing a 1+2 configuration, rather than the 2+1 that you've got going. Alternatively, put a skid under the rudder, and save yourself the weight of the 3rd wheel. I'd also recommend doubling. Run two of those leaf blowers, and you'll get more thrust.
@sailingsolar23715 жыл бұрын
Your using a motor that is a generation or two back obsolete. You might consider trying to use a Dyson vacuum unit as a blower. Just a thought.
@east_carolina_rail_photos6 жыл бұрын
Are you happy KZbin I finally watched it
@anim8dideas8496 жыл бұрын
And It was worth your time :).
@FelonyVideos6 жыл бұрын
Yeah, KZbin has ruined their algorithms. I get the same 50 suggested videos constantly.
@east_carolina_rail_photos6 жыл бұрын
@@FelonyVideos ikr same
@pencilspianos84126 жыл бұрын
At least it’s the right type of suggested video for me.
@J_tqoh6 жыл бұрын
except that if you watch a video that was reccommended, youtube will start showing you more videos like it, so watching a video just to make it go away will have the opposite effect, and I know it was probably a joke, but idk I'm stupid.
@FlyersDistrict6 жыл бұрын
You should go back to home depot and try to return it 😂
@FlatEarthReset36 жыл бұрын
If it was amazon they would accept the return then sell it to one of those youtube channels that buy return items.
@CarpeNoctem1356 жыл бұрын
I followed the instructions to the T and I accidentally made an airplane. Will you compensate me?
@jasonlopez756 жыл бұрын
Yeah, tell em it didn't work, they'll take it back. 😂
@FaithfulMC6 жыл бұрын
Tell them it didn't fly as well as you thought it would.
@shaindaman136 жыл бұрын
Yeah! Tell them this thing doesn't fly worth w crap
@isaacsmith16536 жыл бұрын
Peter Peter Peter Peter Peter This project went the will Osman way xD
@boerharms22096 жыл бұрын
so true XD
@Warrenwalker305 жыл бұрын
Great job and don't think for a second that all the time it took to actually put it together between edits is wasted we appreciate the whole process
@juscozcustoms6 жыл бұрын
flame thrower leaf blower.
@PeterSripol6 жыл бұрын
juscozcustoms this idea, I like it 👌
@addictedtowifi23146 жыл бұрын
Esh getit
@mikaelmakinen9956 жыл бұрын
Flame thrower plane!!! xDD
@bran93806 жыл бұрын
prime thumbnail material
@BobbyDukeArts6 жыл бұрын
That is a good idea
@pacificsigns77806 жыл бұрын
Why not make this thing again but with 2 leafblowers 1 on each wing
@Draganox256 жыл бұрын
It would be even heavier
@aidanm.16836 жыл бұрын
@@Draganox25 Not with electric as it has a higher power:weight ratio, and if they modified it, it probably could
@keegyweegy78036 жыл бұрын
WAY to heavy
@nickspaulding15116 жыл бұрын
YT Meatballzz do you know how heavy a turbine engine is?
@rumle75256 жыл бұрын
nick a turbine engine produces pretty heavy amounts of energy as well
@Waitin4_a_Mate6 жыл бұрын
He should use Flex Seal or Flex Tape to fix all the gaps in his aero in future projects
@micphantom6 жыл бұрын
*NoW tHaT's A lOt oF dAmAgE!*
@Network1265 жыл бұрын
Just stick a prop on the front spinning part for double thrust with no extra electric motor and battery weight lol
@zaccolwell20125 жыл бұрын
You wont create any more thrist due to power loss to the blower.
@startoftext6 жыл бұрын
To trim weight you could use a grinder to cut most of the heat sink fins off the gas engine. It was most likely designed to be used not moving much but when its flying in a plane and has more air moving over the engine it wont need as large of cooling fins. Same reason why old nitro engines for rc cars have much larger heat sinks then nitro airplane engines.
@boostaddict_6 жыл бұрын
That wouldn't work. The turbine pull air over the fins, and removing them would cause the engine to overheat and sieze. The movement wouldn't help as the turbine already pulls air over the fins, so there is no increase in airspeed.
@24by795 жыл бұрын
put a propeller on that rotor thing in the front.
@ashbyreinhold97185 жыл бұрын
Do you know the name of the song played when it finally flew?
@adrianwelgemoed95625 жыл бұрын
@@ashbyreinhold9718 kzbin.info/www/bejne/moLaZapvjMyLmbM There you go
@danielleyva78815 жыл бұрын
@@ashbyreinhold9718 do you know the muffin man?
@ashbyreinhold97185 жыл бұрын
@@danielleyva7881 the muffin man?
@adrianwelgemoed95625 жыл бұрын
The muff
@DatBlueHusky6 жыл бұрын
if you put a bigger carb, port the motor slightly and tuned pipe. It will have a crap ton of power.
@BrilliantDesignOnline6 жыл бұрын
And get rid of the wheels..we don't need no steenkin' wheels. Plus you have the SamCat launch system.
@shutdahellup694206 жыл бұрын
@@BrilliantDesignOnline lol i laughed so hard at the "sam cat launch system "
@guitarsplanes6 жыл бұрын
Running it too much faster would probably result in throwing the connecting rod in the engine. (Engine failure)
@xp27035 жыл бұрын
1900: I bet there will be flying car in the 21th century 2018: Two man made an airplane using leaf blower
@yeinnitbludbruvrenwagwan14635 жыл бұрын
close enough \_(-_-)_/ maybe
@d0nnyr0n5 жыл бұрын
21st* men*
@xp27035 жыл бұрын
@@d0nnyr0n oops, my bad
@firtdudecoolmanplayer53575 жыл бұрын
Its called challenge
@d0nnyr0n5 жыл бұрын
@@firtdudecoolmanplayer5357 It's called "A joke".
@lukeg68956 жыл бұрын
Now he needs to make a helicopter out of a weed whacker
@totallynotthensaorfbi11886 жыл бұрын
first he needs to take my leaf blower cousins to the hospital
@upandoutdoors83136 жыл бұрын
Lol
@deeped72496 жыл бұрын
Since the plane didn't work out, make a leaf blower boat out of the remains
@tedcarl53826 жыл бұрын
Does 2x weed whacker = potential osprey tilt rotor?
@archivedchannel123336 жыл бұрын
Yes
@RandomEndeavors6 жыл бұрын
Please launch a self guided glider from a weather balloon
@rcpi93366 жыл бұрын
The nerdiest roast 8:12
@thefreediverjohn6 жыл бұрын
lmao
@thetennisquest52086 жыл бұрын
Ha
@pauljs756 жыл бұрын
Admittedly, Sam's burn was pretty good too. 7:52
@tibr6 жыл бұрын
Lmao
@marcob60315 жыл бұрын
wow that electric leafblower looks like a 90s VHS camcorder 😂😂😂😂
@hobnobhead40435 жыл бұрын
Sshhh, if he sees this comment he'll try make a VHS fly!
@BenMO6 жыл бұрын
Reminds me of “Junkyard Wars”. Cool build, yours works a lot better.
@TheAngryAstronomer6 жыл бұрын
Now make an EDF leaf blower. Should be a better leaf blower right?
@Ziraya06 жыл бұрын
idea 1: electric aircraft catapult so Sam can keep on the camera idea 2: build a leafblower out of hobby aircraft parts
@nevahenuf6 жыл бұрын
Actually a scaling catapult system would be a cool thing to develop since it'd be reusable in his videos.
@greggv86 жыл бұрын
Get another Lynxx blower from Harbor Freight, remove its fan and replace with an EDF and electronics to run off the stock battery and switches. If it can make lotsa thrust, make it an airplane without hacking up the blower housing.
@lyallmcdonald63345 жыл бұрын
Buy 4 leaf blowerst and put 2 at the bottom and 2 at the back that means when it os in the air u can have the 2 at the bottom pushing up and the back giving speed
@DaneSWilson6 жыл бұрын
Love the AvE inspired unboxing method
@chemicallust776 жыл бұрын
Lmfao!
@ExperimentalFun6 жыл бұрын
I think it will work if you mod the engine, i'm sure you could double the horse power and increase rpm, buy one of those cheap ebay performance exhausts for pocket bikes, get a bigger carburetor, performance spark plug, port and polish, and shave the head. good luck :)
@tomstech43906 жыл бұрын
"Performance spark plug" yeah half that crap you don't need. Bigger carb, flow the ports with a dremel maybe skim the head and remove any governers. The timing is usually static and not very advanced so try and add a few degrees if you can but that alone makes a huge difference other than just a good tune and break in.
@ClarkesMadRcs6 жыл бұрын
good idea buddy that might work in a car but might not on a plane . the exaust would stop the air flow and would be heavy. the carb might actually be a good idea also the spark plug idea is good and the the cutting the head part . nice dude
@ROTAXD6 жыл бұрын
Experimental Fun pb exhausts are for making low end torque, not high rpm power. Won't work in this scenario. Better off finding a pipe for a 1/5 scale buggy. DDM could hook them up.
@chaegibson7206 жыл бұрын
Toms Tech and how exactly do you adjust timing on a 2 stroke?
@finnenjr6 жыл бұрын
@@chaegibson720 on that engine, move the flywheel by grinding down the with of the "key", one millimeter. that part of it that sticks up
@brandonryan95826 жыл бұрын
this is why i still come on youtube.. its not all click bait and red arrows
@Ink_256 жыл бұрын
It has a red arrow though...?
@AAPatriot5 жыл бұрын
KIK'KIN, ADD TAPERED TUBE AT END OF BLOWER, INCREASING CONGESTED THRUST FROM BLOWER. GREAT WORK GUYS.
@stingersswarm6 жыл бұрын
Make a plane that flaps its wings like a bird powered by a jigsaw.
@PeterSripol6 жыл бұрын
StingersSwarm haha that’s on the to try list!
@auterm6 жыл бұрын
So an Ornithopter?
@sonicrail52536 жыл бұрын
I have a great idea, *the crop duster form hell* basically put a flamethrower on a plane It would make a great snow remover
@GeeOhGe35 жыл бұрын
6:32 perfectly synced up
@CraigLandsberg-lk1ep11 ай бұрын
I am so glad you guys did this! Don't be disheartened 😮 you proved that my Ryobi leaf blower could get airborne
@kylestewart90045 жыл бұрын
Hey! Great video guys! I do have a couple suggestions, I’m assuming that is a 2 stroke so a few relatively easy things to try would be to use rc nitro fuel, that will melt the plug to the top of the piston if only that fuel is used, but if you mix your regular high octane gas and oil like normal and then make say a 25%-50% nitro/regular 2stroke fuel mixture you will notice a hp and rpm gain, next I would remove the air filter, place a small screen or sock over the carb/intake for increased air flow and a very small weight savings. Next thing would be to make a small short header, removing the muffler, maybe cut out the the mounting flange from the muffler and solder or JB weld a piece of copper pipe bent to wherever you want it to dump exhaust (anywhere from straight down to pointing directly backwards will give very small increase in thrust). With the other mods back pressure won’t be needed as much but if you’re worried about it you can always drill a few small holes in a cap and place it on the end of the header. If you want to spend a little more time you can remove the motor from the housing and most of these small motors are cast as general purpose motors and used for a wide variety of applications (chainsaws, generators, pumps, etc.) so there usually is at least a few nonessential brackets and things that can be removed but also mounting locations like tabs and nubs on the casting can be cut off and ground down along with casting lines and imperfections, results vary from motor to motor and how much time and effort you put in but a noticeable weight savings can be accomplished. Most of these mods are quick, simple and cheap and cover air in, air out, a higher energy fuel and weight savings. And maybe give you just the performance boost you need for take off and flight.
@prolska2 жыл бұрын
_Oh my god_
@dillpickle200 Жыл бұрын
Peter is a genius, but everything you mentioned was insightful and informative!
@scottfavaro8926 жыл бұрын
Should have turned the clutch at the front into a propellor somehow
@reneorozco21955 жыл бұрын
What I thought too
@steveallen13405 жыл бұрын
And in In my suburb people complain about leaf blowers being used to blow leaves..... This is the ultimate Sunday morning revenge.
*cuts box open with saw* *puts batteries in gas tank* *taps with hammer* *turns on*
@jamesrennalds47376 жыл бұрын
Those were bullets
@genericaccount92226 жыл бұрын
@@jamesrennalds4737 even more effective
@dalebolen23626 жыл бұрын
Those were bullets
@kevintucker33546 жыл бұрын
22 LR rounds.
@tuckerwiley70146 жыл бұрын
No. He put 22 lr rounds in the tank. But yes lmao
@Sakkie_S55_M35 жыл бұрын
you should have used E85 and use a colder spark plug then put a propeller on the pulley starter shaft, use an electric drill to start the motor were the bolt holds the propeller and drop that heavy exhaust manifold!
@martinandersson52785 жыл бұрын
E85 makes no power increase in a two stroke
@XxKingJTuckxX6 жыл бұрын
6:33 the pounding goes with the music lol😂😂😂
@JD-05046 жыл бұрын
I noticed that too!!
@JoTweed6 жыл бұрын
Lol😂
@العربية-ش7م6 жыл бұрын
JGame PlayerT орнул . lol 😂
@dickJohnsonpeter6 жыл бұрын
Not at all
@mionikat6 жыл бұрын
LOL
@bradames37555 жыл бұрын
Gas blower: remove engine governor, cut mating flange off muffler and weld to piece of tubing (lighter and straight piped), grind off a bunch of excess engine case material, etc. A ton could be done to lighten the blower assembly still and make it produce more power for little to no cost
@CyberMacGyver5 жыл бұрын
..but can you make a leafblower from an rc plane? 🤔
@JulioAvalos30005 жыл бұрын
Hold my beer...
@markwyler13684 жыл бұрын
Edf planes work great
@hoddi04626 жыл бұрын
It goes with the beat in the song 6:34
@hoddi04626 жыл бұрын
Jeez
@miguelsabariego55315 жыл бұрын
Its the rap if fernanflor
@AsianLovePotato6 жыл бұрын
I thought this is your first upload in a long time. I'm on KZbin everyday, and I can say that your other uploads are not showing on my feed.
@meesloeve1526 жыл бұрын
It's because of a youtube update that came out a while ago. The subscription feed will just show 'some' of the vids... It sucks and many people complained but youtube didn't want to fix it i guess? That's why every youtuber is asking you to 'hit the bell button' these days.
@Marlboromanprojects5 жыл бұрын
Entirely entertaining. Being a retired aerospace engineer, I love these guys enthusiasm.😎
@kolinmartz5 жыл бұрын
It could be geared so that the fan spins way faster
@chuckwhitson6545 жыл бұрын
Big-time respect, truly awesome build
@dtiydr6 жыл бұрын
17:19 The strength is there absolutely but it just the way its harnessed that is wrong. An impeller is not that efficient compared to an ordinary propeller so if you would have stuck that on it instead the power would absolutely have been there and would have flown by it self. But I know the challenge was a leaf blower as such it was built.
@onthestageintheaudienceatt7565 жыл бұрын
All he needed to really fly quick was a huge wing that weighed nothing with an aggressive attack posture it didn't even have to be and air foil it just had to be light
@ChadDidNothingWrong5 жыл бұрын
Your problem is using a Ryobi... really though you need remove intake restrictions, remove weight (grinding away any bit of metal you can from the engine mainly), and if you are able to, improve the gearing to the blower for more fan rpm vs engine rpm
@bradames37555 жыл бұрын
And remove engine governor 👍
@charliey10076 жыл бұрын
weld on a big propeller on that spinney thing lol ( on the gas leaf blower ) The air and the thrust from the propeller should give enough lift for a sustained and stable flight..
@NameName-eq7oe6 жыл бұрын
A 2 stroke exhaust pipe / expansion chamber would give you huge power gains.
@nerdspark80846 жыл бұрын
^This!
@turbofan676 жыл бұрын
And some porting work.
@nerdspark80846 жыл бұрын
@@turbofan67 ^Also this!
@danmackintosh63256 жыл бұрын
expansion chamber would probably add too much weight to be an advantage sadly, what would help the most is porting & adding timing (you can get offset woodruff keys for the flywheel to advance a few degrees), then just opening the exhaust up a little more and definitely open up the carb a little, remove the air filter and open the main jet out to correct the mixture at WOT and it'd pick up some power. The engines are far from optimised from the factory but it'd take considerable time and skill (read- lots of 2T tuning experience) to get the best from it.
@danmackintosh63256 жыл бұрын
Another "trick" would be to remove the base gasket and lap the mating surfaces, this has the combined effect of advancing port timing (allowing you to effectively open the tops out by 0.5mm or so to increase duration without ruining the low end/starting performance), and raising the compression ratio slightly too. This and the timing bump would make it a bit harder on the pull start but then again you could even do away with that and use an electric hand held starter and lighten the flywheel a good percentage at the same time.
@newtopix85326 жыл бұрын
Yes i think weight,drag and wing area was your enemy there .I think maybe experimenting with decreasing wing span and airfoil but increase wing area by extending aileron side of wing towards tail. Ive designed and built acrobatic rc planes and those are the key things that make them able to fly with the heavier motor. It looked like you were super close but needed more wing area to maneuver at such a low air speed. Change in airfoil should reduce drag and gain you a little airspeed further increasing stability and manuverability.
@Tooawesome6936 жыл бұрын
Probably didnt help that there were rather large areas perpendicular to the velocity of the plane, like the mounting "plate" for the main wings and the front of the engine. A nose and a smoother surface over the mount may help
@coyoteannabis11925 жыл бұрын
A few tips: Spend the extra cash to get something other than a Ryobi. Great tools for their price point, but obscenely heavy. Try it with a lifting body airframe similar to a B2, mount the blower on top. Blower mods: Straight pipe the exhaust and terminate in line with the primary impeller to reduce parasitic drag on the engine (marginal, but every bit helps), strip as much of the housing as possible.
@the_golden_ingot6 жыл бұрын
I Have actually clicked this fast before!
@tlsmoke236 жыл бұрын
your 1st flight was great GOOD JOB!
@JosephBallin3205 жыл бұрын
"Hello, we made a leafblower airborne, what's our prize?"
@jayarjun56524 жыл бұрын
You had the best blower; one day when we meet I will tell you why you failed and had to use additional propeller! Great effort! Love watching Ya!