Great video cpt, If anyone here has not booked your call with cpt Joe I highly recommend you book it, I done it and was easly the best aviation chat iv had in years ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐. Joe is a extremely passionate pilot that has the experience to help out new pilot's or answer any questions you may have. You can book the call in the description.
@sailaab3 жыл бұрын
🤗👌🏽😇
@marieme0073 жыл бұрын
Oh nice. What part of the description to book the call have not seen it
@ahtashamjee81722 жыл бұрын
pl
@andrewhatton1606 Жыл бұрын
He’s amazing
@ajmjabir10613 жыл бұрын
I'm an aeronautical engineering student and I have airbreathing propulsion exam tomorrow. Capt Joe uploaded this on the right time 😭😭😭 Thank you so much Joe.
@Tranefine3 жыл бұрын
Oh boy! I totally messed up my Propulsion & Performance Exam and still don’t know how. I’m glad I have still passed the semester though! 😅 Good luck to you, mate! 😁
@Raz820003 жыл бұрын
I'm mechanical engineering student and we also have airbreathing propulsion exam this week. I'm shocked.
@ltpi26213 жыл бұрын
Good luck!
@ajmjabir10613 жыл бұрын
@@Tranefine thank you, fam
@ajmjabir10613 жыл бұрын
@@ltpi2621 thank you
@chilitoday3 жыл бұрын
My first plane ride was on a Constellation four engine prop. The noise was incredible and hearing others talk was difficult. Today’s engines sort of hum and what a difference!
@salonikaushik38923 жыл бұрын
A good pilot is always learning. A great teacher is always teaching.
@LNYT-Aviation3 жыл бұрын
Nice one
@HDJess3 жыл бұрын
I would correct that to "A great teacher is always teaching himself before others"
@Jack_The_Ripper_Here2 жыл бұрын
A great teacher is also always learning
@muzikhed2 жыл бұрын
And learning.
@simonakovacova89493 жыл бұрын
I wrote a paper about this for my physics class in high school. Been super interested in jet engines ever since!
@mathuringarcier3 жыл бұрын
I think the Concorde is a TurboJet... Therefore making it the most famous turbojetted aircraft
@Damien.D3 жыл бұрын
Indeed. It's the most famous and technologically advanced airliner ever made, anyway. He's (yes "le" Concorde is a "he" here in France) out of competition in many discipline. It was also the first airliner with complete fly-by-wire, FADEC engine management (albeit using analog computers, so technically it was the one and only "FAAEC" system), and rocket-technology-derived inertial guidance autopilot....
@Andrei8pa33 жыл бұрын
Jettedturbo
@filipkonopacki15473 жыл бұрын
I agree that the Olympus 593-powered Concorde should be at the top of the list, but I’d add the A12 / SR71 to the tally. Yes, I know the J58 is a ramjet hybrid but it’s also a constantly-afterburning turbofan so it counts in my book. Concorde might be more famous but I’d argue that the J58 is the most amazing air-breathing aero engine ever created, especially the speed-adjustable bypass, variable-geometry intake cones and the hypergolic afterburner ignition system. The variable intake ramps on the Olympus 593, albeit amazing, are slightly less sophisticated. NB. I’m pretty fortunate in that both these aircraft sit in Duxford Imperial War Museum, 10 min drive from my home.
@Damien.D3 жыл бұрын
@@filipkonopacki1547 being a great fan of both planes, I have found a way to love both without competition. Concorde is the most famous and most formidable civilian airliner. The Blackbird is the most famous and most formidable military plane. There. Both the best in their domains.
@mathuringarcier3 жыл бұрын
@@Damien.D Une chose est sure c'est que LE Concorde était une merveille à la pointe de la technologie de son époque!
@lachenmann3 жыл бұрын
Now “suck, squeeze, bang, blow” has a whole new meaning to me 🤪😂
@747simmer43 жыл бұрын
its also how car engines work to
@Mrtitanosaur9 ай бұрын
It is how something else works too😂
@HamzaAli-qt5uh2 ай бұрын
Not really@@747simmer4
@noahmekuria8653Ай бұрын
Wb the hawk tua stage?
@robertwren22893 жыл бұрын
It's mind boggling to me how they come up with this stuff in the first place. WOW, you did a great job of explaining it in simple terms.
@wcvp3 жыл бұрын
If I remember correctly, the initial design came from the turbochargers used on piston engines (to help efficiency and power at higher altitudes). Then someone had the idea to just take out the piston engine and just feed the fuel in. And fun fact, the M1 Abrams tank actually uses a jet engine instead of a traditional one with cylinders.
@Peppa_Wiggles239 ай бұрын
@@wcvp It's more like the earlier ideas that resulted in piston engine turbo chargers were the same ideas that resulted in turbojets. The basic axial turbojet engine was first sort of partly cobbled together around or before 1900 by Parsons (Ireland / North England) while doing steam turbine power generation machines. A bladed multi stage axial steam turbine coupled to a axial bladed multistage compressor. Then Parsons did some work on the idea of putting combusters in the middle instead of using steam. People at the time were thinking about it's use as an aircraft engine. A French chap came up with the basic axial bladed multistage turbine idea around 1875.
@StinkyScript3 жыл бұрын
Captain Joe has taught me too much, I really do hope to become a pilot in the future, I wish for nothing else except the experience of flying on a plane. So many things happening all at once, it's just fascinating. after watching almost all of your videos I realized how little I knew about aviation in general.
@Slyze333 жыл бұрын
Hi, I have worked for Safran Aircraft Engines for a while. By the way, thanks or the appreciation of our work 😃 To give extra information on your very good video: - You mention 80% of the thrust comes from the cold air (bypass). The order of magnitude for the leap is around 65%, and 70% for our competitor if i'm not mistaken. But the general idea is indeed to get a bypass ratio as high as possible. The concept is that the hot air that comes from the nozzle drives the cold flux. Therefore, the faster goes the hot air, the faster goes the cold air as well. And as the cold flux represents 10x the amound of air coming from the hot flow, the thrust developped by this bypassed air is huge. One limitation comes from the fact that at some point, the hot flow is not strong enough to lead that much cold air, and you loose in efficiency. That's why we are desperately trying to increase the RPM of the shafts and fan, as well as the turbines' maximum temperature with composite materials. The goal is to rise hot flux's energy to be able to increase the Bypass ratio even more. - One limitation to even bigger engines is definetely their size: can't mount them under the wing; they disturb the flow over the wing as they get bigger and bigger; they induce more stress and bending moments on the wing as they become way too heavy; and so much stress is applied on the fan and other internal components as all parts become too big and tend not to rotate as fast as smaller ones ... We expect to be able to increase efficiency from a maximum of 10-15% compared to current modern jet engines in the following decade, but the next jet engine generation will require a new technology to go further. That's what the Open rotor is about for example. Bye
@juancamilosotopayares28113 жыл бұрын
The fact that a 777-x can fix a whole 737 fuselage in their engines blow my mind 🤯
@CHOXON2CHOXOFF3 жыл бұрын
Yes. Thats biggest and most powerfull engine for commercial aircraft
@Damien.D3 жыл бұрын
Yeah I knew it but still can't make up my mind about that!
@CHOXON2CHOXOFF3 жыл бұрын
@@Damien.D ok.. engineering marvellous
@rocko444444443 жыл бұрын
Imagine a 737 with a 777 engine.
@Damien.D3 жыл бұрын
@@rocko44444444 The cockpit would be split in half and sucked in the engines at takeoff XD
@abjosa40032 жыл бұрын
I Have joined a flight dispatch team recently and started working on myself to learn more and more about flight planning and aviation in General , I really enjoy every moment i spend watching your amazing educational vids, interesting and rich of knowledge. Thank you Capt for your efforts.
@mariokalaany16053 жыл бұрын
Learning new facts every Thursday! "A good pilot is always learning" :)
@MarceloBenjamin3 жыл бұрын
I'm not entirely sure of my answer, but for me the most famous turbojet aircraft is the SR-71 Blackbrid, which was powered by the Pratt & Whitney J58 engines. Those were some mighty engines.
@iknebli3 жыл бұрын
The most iconic turbojet is the Concorde. They didn't really have a choice, for supersonic speed they needed the thrust to be of very high speed air, not of high mass of air, so a turbofan wasn't really an option.
@joevignolor4u9493 жыл бұрын
That's correct and not a lot of people understand it. The faster you want an airplane to fly the higher the speed of the accelerated air has to be as it leaves the back of the engine. That's why a propeller engine that only accelerates air backward at about 400mph can't propel an airplane forward at 600mph. To do that you need a jet engine that can accelerate the air backwards at about 700mph or more.
@NiHaoMike643 жыл бұрын
Boom is planning to use turbofans in their supersonic airliner.
@joevignolor4u9493 жыл бұрын
@@NiHaoMike64 The fan will improve the low altitude, low speed performance of the aircraft. Then the core will take over and accelerate the airplane up to supersonic speeds.
@MendTheWorld3 жыл бұрын
I agree about the Concorde being iconic, but it’s engines are hidden from view. For this reason I’d nominate the Boeing 707 as the most iconic turbojet.
@Bartonovich523 жыл бұрын
@ Joe Vignolo Not quite. For example, the gas flow in the J-58 in the SR-71 is entirely subsonic even though the plane is flying at Mach 3. The thrust comes from the high pressure and expansion of gasses inside of the divergent nozzle. A single stage fan simply can’t generate those pressures out of the fan duct.
@halcyongeezer2 жыл бұрын
I really love the noise of jets spooling up; the loudest I've ever heard was a de Havilland Comet 4 built in 1963, which until 2019 used to do fast taxi runs at Bruntingthorpe airfield in Leicestershire; you could walk so close to it during engine start-up (RR Avon turbojets) that I could feel the noise vibrating through my body! It's still there, alongside an HP Victor, but they don't do taxi-runs anymore, as the runway's been turned into a massive car park. I think their EE Lightnings still do engine runs occasionally though. Although I used to live near Heathrow, I've never stood as close to Concorde during spool-up (Bristol Siddeley turbojets, later known as Rolls-Royce), so I can't compare it.
@timmyzhou13 жыл бұрын
I have recently started playin flight simulator, hence attracted by Joe’s videos. And most of my questions were answered 3-5 years ago. I’m amazed that the Captain can provide interesting contents frequently after all these years. Kudos to u!
@flywithcaptainjoe3 жыл бұрын
Thanks mate!!!
@sailaab3 жыл бұрын
🤗👌🏽👍🏼
@ironzuma46913 жыл бұрын
P
@doctorofminecraft20782 жыл бұрын
@@flywithcaptainjoe Video idea: Could you and Mentor Pilot play Roblox Pilot Training Flight Simulator together?, It could be a great video as the both of you would fly plane's and just like how it is done in real life, I do mention that the game is filled with idiot's but maybe they will be forced to be serious when you guy's fly the plane's.
@peregrina77013 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video! Love your technical content. Best explanation of angular velocity I ever heard. As a trained metallurgist, the materials that somehow survive service in turbofan jet engines boggle my mind. Maybe a future video? 😉 Thanks again!
@thattechieguy3 жыл бұрын
Joe has a unique personality that defines him in a different way than others.. ❤❤ Keep growing keep flourishing
@CHOXON2CHOXOFF3 жыл бұрын
Very true
@mikeschmit0073 жыл бұрын
Yeah, everybody has his own personality. That's life.😉 Cheers🥂
@sudhakarmalu4299 Жыл бұрын
Captain Joe has an amazing way explaining airplanes. I am not an engineer but he has a knack of teaching laymen in a very simple way. Great teacher and what a smile. Wonderful
@f18forlife723 жыл бұрын
I always knew how high bipass engines worked but I didn’t know why engines couldn’t go stupidly big due to the fan blades going faster on the outside so I found this really useful thankyou
@kenbrown28083 жыл бұрын
it's the same reason prop driven planes and helicopters have a maximum airspeed.
@kevinrayner5812 Жыл бұрын
I worked for and did and engineering apprenticeship with Rolls Royce so was aware of the tip velocity issue but the main issue with the engines we made was small size needed in helicopters. You couldn't just make them bigger to get more power and you reach a physical size that you can't go below with the HP compressor blades as they don't work. The pressure ration in a helicopter engine was pathetic compared to a much larger engine. To get round that the HP compressor is centrifugal running at mind boggling rpm.
@lcprivatepilot1969 Жыл бұрын
Love how turbo fan’s create a majority of the thrust, reduce noise and create a cooling effect for the core of the engine. So simple, yet brilliant! (The acceleration of the turbo fans air via the Venturi effect, again … awesome)!
@pandaroll23233 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this great video Cpt Joe - understanding the engines is one of my weak points when chatting in our AV community. I now understand the basic principles of an engine, how the bypass system works and has evolved, and the limitations of that system. Agree with you - total respect to engine designers etc. The info about the 777 engine being as wide as the 737 fuselage just blew my mind lol! Great content as always Joe, thank you!
@eradutiu Жыл бұрын
Makes me think of the way we intake our breaths and blow out at different speeds and power. Just like wind when it blows through mountains closer together, the wind blows stronger creating a bottleneck squeeze. The smaller the space the more power it creates. Taking in large amounts of air and squeezing it through smaller area creates power. So cool to hearing him explain this!!!!
@igornoga53623 жыл бұрын
The most famous turbojet is the SR-71 if turboramjets count, if not it's the Concorde
@clyth413 жыл бұрын
Rubbish ask someone if they remember the most FAMOUS aeroplane in the world they will mention the Concorde not the SR71
@kenbrown28083 жыл бұрын
@@clyth41 you mean the wright flyer, the spirit of St Louis, the Enola Gay, or the Spruce Goose. My wife says the spruce goose.
@soup10293 жыл бұрын
@@kenbrown2808 Military geeks will say SR-71, most non av geeks will say Concorde bc it’s basically a household name of an aircraft, WW2 geeks will say the Me-262, remember, we’re talking abt turbojets not prop planes. It all just depends on the person really. Personally I instantly thought of the Blackbird. I just adore it.
@kenbrown28083 жыл бұрын
@@soup1029 it all depends on how you ask the question. if you ask for the most iconic passenger jet, you will probably get a tossup between the Concorde and the 747. if you ask for the best known, this week, you might get the 737 MAX. if you ask for the first jet people think of, Learjet might make a strong showing.
@captaindunsel28063 жыл бұрын
SR-71 has 9.9 billion results on Google. Me-262 = 7.4 billion. Mig-21 = 162 million. Concorde = 89 million.
@moiraatkinson2 жыл бұрын
Great video! That explanation of how a turbo engine works - in particular Suck Squeeze Bang Blow - even I could understand and I’m about as far from being an engineer as it’s possible to imagine. I’ve soon got lost when I’ve listened to other explanations, but Joe is such a great teacher I enjoyed this video because I could follow it!
@darkknight11933 жыл бұрын
The most famous turbojet aircraft: Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird. The engines at subsonic speed were indeed a turbojet. But above mach 2, it became a hybrid engine (well it was called turboramjet), and it's fuel efficiency increased.
@jsmariani4180 Жыл бұрын
That what I thought of too; however, the Concorde is, no doubt, more famous to the general public.
@wingrider76273 жыл бұрын
The SR-71 with it's J 58 turbo jet engine.is.probably the most famous jet with a non-fan engine. Great video as always and with me being one of the first group of F 16 mechanics (1979-1983) that shot of an F 16 with all 5 stages of burner lit still gives me chill bumps.
@Zenoman12343 жыл бұрын
It’s a great day when Capt. Joe uploads! 😃
@steventibbs65782 жыл бұрын
Using this to help prep for my first airline interview with SkyWest this month and it’s helped so much! Thanks Joe!
@BryanDorr3 жыл бұрын
Famous turbojet: I have to say the early Boeing 707s with the JT3D turbojets. It's amazing what Boeing has done to the 737, which today resembles a twin-engine 707. I miss the classic Boeing 747 "buzzsaw" sound with its P&W JT9D taking off.
@mrcannotfindaname3 жыл бұрын
JT3D is actually a turbofan which has a low bypass ratio.
@MendTheWorld3 жыл бұрын
@@mrcannotfindaname You are correct. however the first Boeing 707s had the JT3C, which was a turbojet, which was upgraded to the JT3D turbofan. Some links: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pratt_%26_Whitney_J57 en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pratt_%26_Whitney_JT3D That’s why I nominated the 707 as the most iconic turbojet. (The engines in the Concorde were hidden in the wings!).
@bobjacobson8582 жыл бұрын
Very interesting video! I watched many others on jet engines, but I still learned a lot from this one. I'm looking forward to watching others by Captain Joe!
@WayneM19613 жыл бұрын
Having been fortunate to fly long haul from Birmingham (UK) to Barbados, a 9 hour flight, I just loved the Boeing 787 dreamliner's Rolls Royce Trent 1000 engines. They seemed soooo quiet even at max power on take off. As I understand it, they are also quite fuel efficient too
@mambula303 жыл бұрын
One of the best explained materials about jet engines for non engineers!
@nanduashok18483 жыл бұрын
Love your videos Capt. Hatsoff 👏👏👏 For an aspiring pilot like me you are always on the youtube subscription list 👍 Cheers!
@MrOlderandwiser3 жыл бұрын
Very interesting video. All of your videos are so informative. I appreciate all the hard work you do to prepare these videos!
@SinghAlokkrishna3 жыл бұрын
Once again a great analysis, informative and impressive session Captain Joe.
@conned Жыл бұрын
It's an engineering conundrum,as fans grew in diameter, so must be ground clearance, the height n Strength of landing gear,like the F4U..etc...etc..good sharing, Joe!.
@PilotUlli3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this very good lesson about the jet-engines! 😃👍 Of course the Concorde is the most famous turbojet aircraft! 😉
@brucegoodwin6343 жыл бұрын
Turbofan/prop/fan physics: satisfying real world umphf! Thanks Joe!
@drewb.93013 жыл бұрын
The most famous turbojet aircraft I can think of that would be related to this channel would probably be the de Havilland Comet. Opening the door to a new age of air travel while teaching important lessons about the challenges of having a pressurized cabin. Unfortunate that they were such hard learned lessons.
@syedghalib31582 жыл бұрын
Extremely nice and well perceivable presentation. When I watched your videos about landing, instruments, etc, I thought it is going to be all that a pilot does. However, never guessed there is a great aeronautical engineer in you as well. Congratulations.
@muhammedarfak13803 жыл бұрын
Such a great work learning new things 😀
@aiestef Жыл бұрын
Noob Aerospace Systems student here struggling to understand why bypass air provides more thrust than the core air. After so many informational videos, yours is the first to answer & explain it in a manner I can finally understand. Should've just looked up your channel first, considering I'm a Follower!
@jeremybaraka93013 жыл бұрын
Nice video Captain Joe! I used to wonder why the engines on 737s that were manufactured in the 1970s were smaller than the ones manufactured today. Thanks for answering my question!👍
@zaphod4245 Жыл бұрын
I mean I'd argue that concorde is the most famous plane period, which ofc also makes it the most famous turbojet plane.
@jeremymurphy73203 жыл бұрын
I'm sure Joe is looking for the Concorde as the answer to his quiz but I'm saying the SR 71 even though some say that's a turboramjet.
@ChrisZoomER3 жыл бұрын
It technically is a turboramjet and not a pure turbojet.
@scarecrow108productions73 жыл бұрын
@@ChrisZoomER god bless Kelly Johnson for making the most legendary supersonic recon plane to ever soar the skies....
@yashoza76203 жыл бұрын
Great video as always! I'm an Aviation enthusiast and Mechanical engineer by profession, your video always inspires me @Captain Joe. I think Boeing 707 and BAE Concorde are the most famous Turbojet powered aircrafts!
@dakkedankos41163 жыл бұрын
I would say that the Concorde was the most famous Turbojet airplane that existed.
@rishadtahjeeb36783 жыл бұрын
I love the content. You have such a soothing tone, makes it better. Thanks for this!
@smartbraininternational71383 жыл бұрын
The Concord was the most well known Turbojet engine aircraft. And, the most loved and missed. Enough to make me actually cry when I saw on T.V. the last one land, thereby bidding a farewell to a dream I will never have the chance to fly on.
@toldsammy42033 жыл бұрын
another amazing and insightful video Joe, nicely done!
@sirBrouwer3 жыл бұрын
The most known turbo jet aircraft would have been the Havilland comet. As it was the very first to exist as a commercial option.
@jonnytoast3 ай бұрын
I'm guessing your over 40, prob closer to over 50. I'm 44, love aviation and have 6 close family members in the airlines dating back to the 60s and 70s and didn't know of the comet until fairly recently. How many people in the world under 40 know what a "de Havilland Comet" was. It's so famous you can't spell the actual company that made it. I'm just saying the average person (especially nowadays with all the bad wrap in the news), knows and has most likely been on a type of 737, making it the most famous. Not the first, best, fastest, or maybe iconic, but the most famous ie well known. I understand why you would say that. This is what's wrong w America. Giving our opinion on stupid shit that doesnt matter on the internet with people we don't know while thinking we're right about an opinion. Lol. Hope you have a great day man. Safe flight
@cherryann65243 жыл бұрын
Never stop learning. Never stop teaching. Be blessed and be a blessing. 🙏
@this_sabby Жыл бұрын
no offense but my brain went to a completely different topic at 2:45 ☕☕😭😭🗿🤣🤣😅😂🤣😂😅😅
@captain7473 жыл бұрын
The happiness when u see a new video uploaded by Capt Joe is just unbeatable
@mostlybasic3 жыл бұрын
I have worked for Rolls-Royce for Trent engines, and yes I can say, you've explained everything with super ease..
@AdedayoDaniel9 ай бұрын
This shii is hard, can't really relate but I respect y'all engineers a lot 🙌🏾
@il-2forsale573 жыл бұрын
All the best from RUSSIA for all CJ's subscribers!!!
@ashleesue3 жыл бұрын
I was taught in fundamentals "fundies" in the USAF for crew chief school that a jet engine doesn't push....it pulls. The explanation: The turning/burning engine produces expanding, hot, high pressure, high velocity air exhausting it out the back (what is it pushing against?) This hot, expanding, high pressure air wants to become low pressure again thus the fan is essentially pulling the aircraft/engine forward gulping in the low pressure air. I'm not saying that's what's happening as I don't design these but that's what I remember being taught in 1989 when I joined the USAF and was an F-16 crew chief.
@FrankC3213 жыл бұрын
Wow, I never thought of that. Guess that is a correct explanation, thank you!
@Deltarious3 жыл бұрын
The real question is when will airlines finally implement Rockwell Automation's Retro Encabulator into their engines?
@MeaHeaR3 жыл бұрын
Joe needs to explain it's operation first
@benthompson89993 жыл бұрын
Great video Joe! Always learning something new and you have a great visual way of explaining things! Cheers
@superskullmaster3 жыл бұрын
I’m thinking Captain Joe has never heard the buzz saw sound of supersonic fan tips that happens in many turbofans.
@topethermohenes76583 жыл бұрын
The sound of inefficiency 😂
@donaldstanfield88623 жыл бұрын
He's heard it all right, mate.
@hlalelemahlaela77 Жыл бұрын
At the Air School that I attended I was taught that if the blade tips spin at angular velocity greater than speed of sound, they're going to vibrate as they constantly break that sound barrier and that vibration will eventually cause an entire engine to vibrate wildly on the wing and that is unwanted. Same goes for propellers and Helicopter rotors.
@davidg63703 жыл бұрын
You forgot about the triple shaft technology of the RR civil engines. This decoupled the Fan from the the LP compressor allowing better rotor speed management.
@Bartonovich523 жыл бұрын
At the expense of higher weight and complexity.
@ChapaLipar3 ай бұрын
@@Bartonovich52well, there is always a trade off. An engine is a compromise between a lot of factors. On top of that, there is a difference between the theory and the practice. For example the Gear Turbo Fan ( or GTF) is a good idea but difficult to realize. Like N1 vs EPR, etc. It’s the same for the size of the engine. A bigger fan is good for takeoff, but it generates a lot of drag during flight.
@bmwem9291 Жыл бұрын
The explanation why lots of bypass flow is so important for lots of thrust (80%) is excellent. As an engineer, I would have preferred, in addition, at least a reference to Issac Newton and especially his third law (for every force/reaction there must be an equal and opposite force/reaction). The fan produces thrust exactly the same way a rifle recoils against your shoulder when it is fired except the fan is a continuous process. The rifle spits a bullet (that has mass) out the front and a fans spits air (that certainly has mass) out the back. Imagine how much force it would take to physically throw the mass of a car out the back of the engine every second. The same force propelling the equivalent mass of a car aft must be applied in the opposite direction to the engine (through the fan blades) and that is what pushes (thrust) the airplane forward. More air (a bigger fan) means more mass, and that means more thrust just as a more massive bullet (and bigger charge) makes for a bigger black and blue mark on your shoulder. Also, do not underestimate how heavy (massive) plain old air is. A one inch square column of air the height of the atmosphere weighs 14.7 pounds. Collect and compress literally tons of it through that huge fan blade in the front of the engine and you have lots and lots of mass being thrown out the back. My GF tells me she never asks me what time it is as I respond by telling her how to make a watch. I hope this is not construed the same way.
@fromnorway6438 ай бұрын
That "car" is thrown out with a speed of roughly 900-1000 km/h, so imagine a Boeing 777 throwing out _two_ cars per second at that speed, or an A380 throwing out _four_ somewhat smaller cars per second.
@richc47us3 жыл бұрын
Much better graphics and lighting Joe! Keep up the good work.
@boytheodore3 жыл бұрын
This is the clearest explanation I have ever seen !
@normadesmond96593 жыл бұрын
As much as I loved and miss the Concorde, the 737 will always be an icon and that it was first rolled out with my favorite airline Lufthansa! The haircut will have to grow on me Joe :). Great video as always!
@Quiquetenax3 жыл бұрын
For me the ultimate turbojet aircraft was Kelly Johnson’s amazing SR-71with a pair of Pratt & Whitney J58 (JT11D-20J or JT11D-20K) afterburning turbojets, 25,000 lbf (110 kN) thrust each JT11D-20J 32,500 lbf (144.57 kN) wet (fixed inlet guidevanes) JT11D-20K 34,000 lbf (151.24 kN) wet (2-position inlet guidevanes). I lived near Mildenahall as a child and saw them weekly. Amazing aircraft.
@pigybak3 жыл бұрын
The Max and Neo engines look ginormous on their planes.
@LordVader57383 жыл бұрын
@11:20 my co-workers and I thank you for the compliment! We hope the aviation industry is happy with the PW1100G family.
@grumpybear7413 жыл бұрын
IMHO, the Messerschmitt ME 262 is the first plane that comes to mind when you ask "What's the most famous turbo jet aircraft?". It revolutionized aircraft propulsion.
@jabariphillips7663 жыл бұрын
What a great video describing how a turbo fan works. I really enjoyed how you described the bypass ratio.
@rudinatelaj713 жыл бұрын
Great session, illustrated by great animation clips. I was wondering at what approx. altitude the jet fans start to receive the bypass air ? in other words when can no longer supply the LP compressor with intake air ? Now you know why the aircrafts like cold climates ( air density at higher altitudes)
@donaldstanfield88623 жыл бұрын
On the ground, that is where they need the most thrust for takeoff, plus reverse thrust to land safely!
@mikecowen65072 жыл бұрын
I believe the confusion comes from ALL the air going through the fan, and a small amount of air *after* the fan is drawn into the core.
@ChaosWIelder3 жыл бұрын
Learned more in this video than I ever did working on software at Pratt & Whitney for five years.
@johnny_eth3 жыл бұрын
You shoulf have complemented this video with a graph showing how efficient the engines have become.
@kittysparkleeyes2 жыл бұрын
as a person that usually watches nail and makeup videos, I have no idea how this channel came up on my algorithm but I am now completely hooked and have been binge watching for days xd I love flying but who knew how fascinating it all was!
@kadabarVIM3 жыл бұрын
Me: *marvels at the science behind jet engines Kennedy Steve: *meh, huge hair dryers*
@julzb71653 жыл бұрын
Our family love learning from your channel. This was another well explained video. Keep up the good work!
@swazoz75393 жыл бұрын
I love your new haircut joe!
@bobdoom34233 жыл бұрын
BEST PILOT ON THE TUBE.CANT WAIT FOR NEW INSTALLMENTS,IM WITH YOU RADIO GUY ONLINE,SAME THINKING
@venvi3 жыл бұрын
OMG if cpt joe is a professor then people could do many things with his guidance.. A pilot always learn new things but cpt joe is teaching as well ...He is legit 🔥🔥🔥
@usaviation22812 жыл бұрын
I cannot tell a lie, But this is one of the best i mean BEST videos i have seen explaining the engines. Well done and thank you!!!
@LNYT-Aviation3 жыл бұрын
Captain joe intro never get old
@WOOF953 жыл бұрын
Great video as always! You always pull back the curtain so the general public understands what's going on behind the scenes!
@arishravi41393 жыл бұрын
Joe you are amazing teacher ❤
@techgalaxy265325 күн бұрын
The most simplest and informative video bank is by Cpt. Joe. Thanks, I've watched couple of video, I'm just new to here as a student of AME❤
@Awdacc2 жыл бұрын
As a student pilot this is helping me in AGK, Ty
@acque20113 жыл бұрын
The fact that there are people inventing this is just mindblowing. Hats off
@Skybound_travel2 жыл бұрын
8:41 I’m guessing concord might be the most famous turbojet aircraft
@andreicrisan81453 жыл бұрын
I have nothing but love for those videos. Great information, great delivery of it!
@otherplane01833 жыл бұрын
Great video! I love that! Now I know how a jet engines works. Thank you Captain Joe!
@ChrisZoomER3 жыл бұрын
I'm so glad you said it is indeed the bypass air that's compressed by the fan through the narrowing channel and accelerated out the back of the bypass duct/fan casing that produces bypass thrust, not the fan itself. Though the fan may act like a propeller, it's nothing more than a compressor for both the core flow and bypass flow.🥇Keep up the good work! P.S. I'd say the Concorde is by far the most famous, or at least the most iconic turbojet aircraft to have ever flown!
@heroknaderi2 жыл бұрын
Very cool info thank you.😀
@J.Knezzy6 ай бұрын
Learning about how planes work is helping me conquer my fear of flying. Watching channels like Captain Joe’s and 74Gear are invaluable to those like me who like to catastrophize mid flight.
@yutahestifirmani76843 жыл бұрын
Videos from captain joe are always cool, inspiring, educational and entertaining, you have a great spirit and very smart. ✈️🌏🌎🌍✈️
@green303yup33 жыл бұрын
F16, no doubt. EVERYONE have heard "f16" somewhere. I LOVE your videos btw, I'm starting pilot school in 3 years, and this is both fun and useful...
@evgenytsvetkov27813 жыл бұрын
I really like this type of videos and your explanation, thanks Captain Joe!)
@johnlewis80493 жыл бұрын
In the commercial world, I’d have to say Concorde and with the pleasure, even if I’m wrong, of being by the side of LHR R27R watching a sunset take off of that beautiful aircraft and watching the reheaters turn on. Great video Cap’n Joe ….. oh nice haircut too 👍🏻
@donaldstanfield88623 жыл бұрын
I've enjoyed the runway experience, but after Concord was grounded. Sad, that would be awesome to see!