SUBSCRIBE! Was there anything I missed? What are your thoughts? Let me know! :) Fazbear Frights: Episode 1 - NEXT WEEKEND!
@christophergarcia8031 Жыл бұрын
8 LOVE YOU PLSSSSS RESPOND I SWEAR ID KILL MYSELF
@AaronLoving Жыл бұрын
The fan base didn’t breakdown this book, this book caused the fan base to have a simultaneous breakdown
@dylansuperti214 Жыл бұрын
Honestly mat pat should of mad the book
@Idfkidc-p2o Жыл бұрын
@@dylansuperti214no
@quickhakker Жыл бұрын
i personally feel this is a fan made thing cause there are elements that seem like someone is just predicting the ending (gregory and vannessa/vany page) which TBH until ruin comes out we dont know 100% what ending is the canon ending
@connerwills6802 Жыл бұрын
It’s almost definitely the Afton ending, why would it be the only one to have an animated ending
@quickhakker Жыл бұрын
@@connerwills6802 that's what I'm saying, the only reason I can see that it wouldn't be is they story boarded all the other endings and didn't get round to animating them, which is a stretch
@celestedescieux2514 Жыл бұрын
They are timeline. The elements described in one or another are real informations, like the obvious vannessa freeing after beating glitchtrap. It just will not probably happen that way.
@Uggabugga07 Жыл бұрын
@@connerwills6802 its not the only animated ending
@Uggabugga07 Жыл бұрын
And also it isnt fan made sadly, it is official
@azimuddin18904 ай бұрын
(5:59) I disagree, this book says that he is terrorized by the nightmare while also showing an art of him with Nightmare behind him. F.N.A.F.5 confirmed that the fake bedroom from F.N.A.F.4 is, well a fake bedroom, along with the PlushTrap hallway. It’s a parallel to F.N.A.F.1, but like Edwin from Tales PizzaPlex, and Henry, F.N.A.F.6 happened within Tales, so Henry exists while also having similarities to Edwin. The private room also shows a Fredbear plush with a walkie talkie, which would explains who Fredbear plush was, which was Aubergine Man (William Afton) despite some weird implications due to F.N.A.F.4 and Aubergine Man being in the restaurant while the plush is outside. Aubergine Man Jr being the player theory was brought from piecing together evidence, but I think perhaps evidence may be misinterpreted, perhaps? To me, it feels like there’s more evidence and confirmation that EvanBearCC (F.N.A.F.4 C.C) is the player in F.N.A.F.4.
@funaddict205 Жыл бұрын
I wonder if Matpat will react to your FNaF timeline
@hyperion90901 Жыл бұрын
This is a lot calmer of a take, and I enjoy it, while this seems to be a bit of a letdown, it’s still cool to have imo No real revelations, iffy renders and stuff, but for a quick “here’s the basics”, I think it does it’s job
@darkoverlord7626 Жыл бұрын
You are playing as the crying child in fnaf 4, sometimes you turn around and see flowers or tubes hinting you are in a hospital, and who needs a hospital? Yep the child who got their head bit off. The Crying Child. So you are literally in the crying child's nightmares of hallucinations. There is also a hint in Nightmare Fredbears lines in ucn where he says "I assure you, I am very real" or this time there is more than illusion to fear" William basically made illusions for his child to fear. Why else would the Crying Child be afraid of animatronics and be so against the idea of being anywhere near one? This can also be proven by Nightmare Freddy's line "I am remade, but not by YOU,..." so yeah you play as the Crying Child. Boom
@andreabanuelosavila2317 Жыл бұрын
That makes more sense than that old theory of the nightmares being physical creations…I mean, WTH?
@W.golden_editz246 Жыл бұрын
The nightmares are the nightmares of some who went to Freddy’s before and we didn’t see c.c do and the gameplay of fnaf 1 and 4 are similar plus phone guy’s call is used as ambiance so the nightmares are a combination of Michaels memories of c.c dying and him being a security guard
@SCP-469 Жыл бұрын
He’s in a coma, and he’s a kid, so he probably doesn’t know what an IV is. How could he see them in a COMA.
@s.a.m.2300 Жыл бұрын
@@SCP-469the house in FNAF4 is a real location confirmed by Sister Location, so why would he be seeing it if he was in a coma? Its obvious that these nights occur while he is awake. The Nightmares are his older brother and his friends, but the illusion discs from The Twisted Ones are making him see nightmares
@Trontotario6 күн бұрын
The hospital equipment is probabaly supposed to show us that the bedroom is where he dies
@goncaloandrade5866 Жыл бұрын
I completely agree, I see people getting mad because Michael isn't in it, which is just probably Scott not wanting to reveal anything about him. And people say the encyclopedia failed because BOn bOn iSn'T iN FunF 3 but anyone can literally see that Bon Bon is definatly not there, it is a mistake but not a big deal at all. They say, OMG it's trash because the ghost form of Crying Child NEVER appeared, like, what is the problem? He did die and that's just showing his form, are they honestly ignoring the really good art to pull up something like that? These are all things a noob that's interested in the lore can understand by watching videos LIKE EVERY FAN OUT THERE THAT DIDN'T HAD THIS BOOK COULD. People are so depressing...
@goncaloandrade5866 Жыл бұрын
@@Luler-l8t He's there, it's just that it has that FNaF 3 mistake
@goncaloandrade5866 Жыл бұрын
@@Luler-l8t Good
@DiamondBatToons Жыл бұрын
I can't stand the idea of the Michael being who we play as in FNaF 4, it completely throws so much out of the window and just complicates things even more
@s.a.m.2300 Жыл бұрын
Exactly. It makes way more sense that we play as The Crying Child, while his older brother is Nightmare Foxy
@KavinCatastrophe Жыл бұрын
Everything you said in this video I agree. People really over exaggerated when it came to this book. People going around saying the book confirms Vanny/Vanessa are the same, Gregory being Human, Crying Child etc. This was not the book purpose. And your explanation on Mike and why he not in the book is what I have been basically been telling people. Although Matpat saying he may not be an Afton did get me a bit interested if that might be true. Overall this book was just a quick guide to all the characters. Revealing things what people should already know. Nothing more. Keep up the good work.
@therealharshlycritical Жыл бұрын
So people are exaggerating what is literally written in the book? lol calm down
@SCP-469 Жыл бұрын
Vanny and Vanessa being not being the same proves that when the series ISN’T complicated and outright obvious, the fans will make it complicated
@m0ssy_r0ck Жыл бұрын
i feel like the reason burntrap and the blob aren't their canon names is because they're not part of a canon ending, and therefore are not canon characters. as seen in ruin, by collecting the scraps of comics from gregory, the one true ending of security breach was revealed to be the princess quest ending where gregory, vanessa, and glamrock freddy's head are seen eating ice cream on top of a hill (the same hill as the "lore keeper" ending of fnaf 6 perhaps?? that's a question for another day though-). but anyway, that's just my thoughts of it and trying to make sense of the book that clearly doesn't make very much sense in the first place..
@alexrivers8163 Жыл бұрын
so wait are the animatronics attack patterns canon to the universe of Fnaf cause that map layout would kind of imply they are.If so that means William was experimenting and testing the attack patterns of the animatronics possibly for some reason?
@MiloMurphysLaw Жыл бұрын
Yeah, it is weird that Phone Guy isn’t in this book. But then again, that’s not his canon name, right? So it’s a character that we’ve never actually seen, and we don’t have his actual name, we’ve just heard his voice. And like, what do we know about him besides the fact that he died? Even that is something that has a lot of speculation over which animatronic killed him, so they probably wouldn’t want to mention his death because it would confirm who killed him.
@ix_skillx_pxin4645 Жыл бұрын
I know that it has no lore importance but the one thing that makes me upset is that they called lolbit,mangle and funtime foxy a he/him even if mangles gender is "yes" and lolbit is most likely female or both aswell and i dont think that scott wrote this book because he would make the half of the fandom upset because he reffered them as a he/him even if there are a lot of people that think that they are girls
@ix_skillx_pxin4645 Жыл бұрын
Mangles gender is yes she can be a girl or he can be a boy its not they/them and i personaly think that lolbit,mangle and funtime foxy are all girls and boys
@ix_skillx_pxin4645 Жыл бұрын
@@tamaritamarileonardo394 and also mangle is both gender because the fox is female and the endo is male
@ix_skillx_pxin4645 Жыл бұрын
@@tamaritamarileonardo394 true but the thing with lolbit and ft foxy from SL in my opinion they are both girls and boys
@AestheticEyeliner Жыл бұрын
Well at least we know now. It’s not your game no need to get upset
@duckmangameing Жыл бұрын
Love your videos
@brickTopia-stopmotion Жыл бұрын
The book isn’t 100% accurate. I don’t even think Scott made it. It feels more like a fan wrote it since there are many inconsistencies in the text and other stuff as well. (Like the pictures are wrong for some of the characters)
@whiteman12 Жыл бұрын
It is definitely made by scott if you look at his Amazon page
@SCP-469 Жыл бұрын
Whenever FNAF fans don’t like something it’s always “Scott wouldn’t want this” when HE made the decision and it’s just something they don’t like personally
@Roxy._.gaxhaclub Жыл бұрын
I really want this book, but my mom doesnt let me buy it...i rlly wanna know more about fnaf!!
@75JUNAKI Жыл бұрын
5:50 I do think Evan is the player in F.N.A.F.4.
@s.a.m.2300 Жыл бұрын
Who the hell is Evan?
@christophergarcia8031 Жыл бұрын
FIRST 🎉 I LOVE YOUR VIDEOS AND I CANT WAIT FOR THE FULL STORY AND IM ATA WORK RIGHT NOW BUT IM 11 YEARS OLD I CANT WAIT FOR THE MOVIE BRO 8 LOVE YOU ❤❤❤❤
@christophergarcia8031 Жыл бұрын
AHHHH RESPOND LSSSSSS
@PikachuGamerSMT Жыл бұрын
Lol it’s not all of em just some of em
@candlelightgames7901 Жыл бұрын
Grim foxy is sed to be in security breach
@Fazonn_official Жыл бұрын
Whare is Mike ?
@egg_ox Жыл бұрын
Ooooooh. This is where that awful art of Emily Afton came from.
@lunamaxis115 Жыл бұрын
You mean Elizabeth?
@egg_ox Жыл бұрын
man. I was even looking at the name and everything
@SleepyAsHH3 Жыл бұрын
I feel like Scott just made it to give the bare minimum of knowledge and the book wasnt made with the intention to answer fan questions at all. Also (and this is just my theory) but i remember it being said that Micheal would play a big role in the movie, so maybe he didnt have a page bc all would be revealed there instead
@klipsfilmsmelbourne Жыл бұрын
fazbear entertainment poorly cover up hiring poor writers
@therealharshlycritical Жыл бұрын
the book is bad because it was slapped together and nonsensical not because of the crying child also everything else you said is just an assumption with no base
@rossandcushlaebzery991 Жыл бұрын
This book looks like it sucks tbh. The mixture of low quality pictures, and the amount of SO MANY WRONG COLOURS! allot of the animatronics have the wrong colours or arent coloured in certain spots, example- toy chica. In one of here pics her tob beak is yellow but rendered as if it should've been orange . Def not buying this book.
@dallashammon8033 Жыл бұрын
It is sooo funny that this guy still thinks crying child isnt the person you play as in fnaf 4 when he is literally who you follow throughout the game😭
@personexisting123 Жыл бұрын
In the mini games, yes. But in the main gameplay? Way more evidence for Mike.
@HyperDroid Жыл бұрын
remember FNAF 3? where you play as Michael but follow the MCI throughout the minigames between each night (which takes place 30 years before the events of the main gameplay)
@tomkubus Жыл бұрын
@@personexisting123 aswell as Scott saying that the main evdience for that (back then) was actually important and we should use it
@s.a.m.2300 Жыл бұрын
Right? There isnt even any evidence to suggest that we play as Mike. More like that Mike is Nightmare Foxy
@nobod2567 Жыл бұрын
You would know everything about FNaF if you watch MatPat's videos
@sassykosmo1793 Жыл бұрын
Not really unfortunately; although they're good, a lot of his videos contridict each other at times, and that's not just because new information is being presented through future games and books. In fact, I've seen reaction videos that point out places where his current timeline contridicts itself from one part to another.
@pdd5793 Жыл бұрын
my man reducing an entire community and theorist to matpat lol
@s.a.m.2300 Жыл бұрын
Matpat has been wrong many times, and is still wrong today. Scott rarely does anything to confirm anyone's theories, so MatPat is not the expert he claims himself to be