This Is How Trump Can Actually Put The Panama Canal Under U.S. Control: GOP Lawmaker Dusty Johnson

[@SwampFox11]

We cannot allow China to have operational control over the Panama canal.

[@AydiliaraAyarza]

You have no clue of who controls the Panamá Canal. You are just repeating nonsense.

[@noacktexas]

@@AydiliaraAyarza He didnt say they were currently operating it. He is stating a fact though....if now or ever China gets involved, we should prevent that.

[@cabal0092009]

Bunch of post-election political lies

[@karimbennett5651]

So, are you willing to engage in a nuclear exchange with China over the Panama Canal?

[@uberuberexperience5578]

USA must take back control of the Panama Canal period. America led Globalization is over. A country benefited from the Globalization now, enemy of America.

[@petertimmins6657]

I’m a retired US Army Airborne Infantry Senior NCO. I served 2 tours, 6 years, in Panama 🇵🇦. In that time I met and married my wife. Our children were born in Panama. I retired from the Army in 2010 and immediately moved back. I live, literally, about a mile from the Port of Balboa. We also have friends that work for the canal. I say all that to show that I probably know what is going on with the canal than this braying jackass. The Chinese are NOT in control of the canal. As for the ports on both ends of the canal, you are not being told the full story. Each end has ports that are divided into smaller sub ports and Panama has contracted out for companies to run these sub ports. Of the 5 subports in Balboa, one and only one is run by a Chinese company. There are one or two that are run by American companies also. If we were to try and reclaim the canal it would cause an irreversible fracture in the relations between Panama and the U.S. If you want to see the U.S. fully pushed out of Panama all you need to do is try and reclaim the canal.

[@sabb4989]

Thank U mister! As a panamanian I can assure you and anyone listening that YOU ARE EXACTLY RIGHT! It can go so far as the 1964 break of diplomatic relationships with USA which is the first historic time a latinamerican country did that! THE CANAL IS NON NEGOTIABLE UNDER ANY FORM, SHAPE OR CIRCUMSTANCE!

[@davidreidenberg9941]

@@sabb4989U.S. has the right and the obligation to defend the canal. So if hostilities actually broke out between the U.S. and China, what would it take for the Chinese to sabotage the canal? Furthermore, why does the United States Navy have to pay to have their ships transit the canal?

[@sabb4989]

@@davidreidenberg9941 According to the treaty, USA has the right to defend the canal IF AN AGRESSION OCCURS OR IT'S TRAFFIC IS CLOSED. That has not happened and there is ABSOLUTELY NO INDICATION OF that posibility. The economical tensions of USA with China are purely commercial. And in the case it was needed it shall be done in coordination with Panamaniam govenment cuz Panama is a free, independent country. It would be a cooperation or assistance. Even the Neutrality Treaty mandates that the Canal is NEUTRAL AND OPEN TO ALL NATIONS OF THE WORLD Including China. As a matter of fact, USA is the first client of Panama Canal and China is No. 2. In regards to transit fees the treaty states ALL SHIPS, REGARDLESS ON THE NATION WILL PAY FOR TRANSIT. USA militay ships have the advantage of expedite transit, meaning they don't wait in line. They pay, they come and they pass. All.of the rest of ships have to wait in line for several days depending of de demand cycle.

[@dukiman13]

​@@davidreidenberg9941because every other ship has to pay so the canal can run smoothly and cover costs

[@philmcleod111]

@@davidreidenberg9941 Do you live where the roads you travel on are toll roads . Do you pay the tolls or take a different route?

[@Baddy187]

Two words: Monroe Doctrine

[@jasoncritides7411]

Yeah. Monroe Doctrine, n what?

[@jagpty]

The Monroe Doctrine is not a valid argument in a civilized world, it is a valid argument in a world dominated by a caveman with a club, nothing more. The United States has demonstrated throughout history that it handles its international relations like a caveman.

[@corbiewhite7113]

You lose

[@ericx1419]

This is the point many are missing

[@KimahriRonsoTheHornless]

I agree. No more colonization of the western hemisphere..... OR ELSE

[@aucontraire1986]

This needs to be done ASAP. China cannot hold this much influence over US trading routes.

[@neilbrown2948]

you are talking about trade routes from china to the us.did i miss something here??

[@dreb222]

@@neilbrown2948Originating points are irrelevant for this conversation. That’s what you missed. One, we cannot afford to have an authoritarian power that’s openly shaping its military for the sole purpose of combatting the U.S. and its allies in control and maintaining the hand of influence over any trade routes that are used by the U.S. and its allies. Two, with the aforementioned, it’s important to consider the steps we’ve already taken to decouple our economy from Chinas, and the steps we’re expecting to take over the next four years to mostly finish severing our economy from Chinas as we pursue independence in almost every economic avenue including manufacturing in preparation for kinetic engagement likelihood. Like it or not, this is the most realistic outcome within the next 5 to ten years.

[@neilbrown2948]

@@dreb222 bull

[@neilbrown2948]

@@dreb222 as long as american companies can buy goods cheaper in china they will.all drump is going to accomplish is piss of americas allies.

[@dreb222]

@@neilbrown2948 No BS Neil. Not BS at all. I know it’s a hard pill to swallow if you haven’t been read up on current events, but it’s absolutely the reality without exaggeration. I’ve been in the DOD for 14 years now, let’s just say I’m an analyst and logistics is my sector of expertise without giving away information I can’t give out. I’ve been studying this entire situation in detail from a “kinetic” perspective for over 3 years now, and I can tell you the reality is much worse than we can discuss on this platform. But don’t take my word for it, do your own research, there’s plenty of OSINT easily accessible to give you enough information that outlines exactly what I’ve said here. Good luck man.

[@tobberfutooagain2628]

Lubricating the Panama Canal with Soy Sauce is bad…

[@ipilides]

This is a very good confession…the importance of the Panama Canal for the US economy. Having said that, this “dusty” should read a bit of history and realize that someone can buy something when it’s for sale…the country is not at sale. Instead of submitting nonsense to the congress or senate, this guy should submit a bill to strengthen the relation of his “great nation” with international partners.

[@VictorHerrera-ye6gq]

75% doesnt even know where Panamá is 😂

[@howardp924]

Didn’t Camela Harris say it was a strip of water near Florida.

[@MickeyMouse-zu2yk]

"don't" not "doesn't"

[@who6339]

Its where the canal's at silly.

[@MrMorristhecatp]

That is correct

[@pracliu1268]

@@MickeyMouse-zu2yk Glad you agree with the statement though

[@BobPruett]

Carter was a fool for giving the canal away and because Panama has broken the terms of the treaty we should take it back.

[@AnthonyPutnam-j8q]

Thinking the exact same

[@ulise0928]

The setting of tariffs for the Panama Canal is conducted in a transparent and public manner. The Panama Canal Authority (ACP) holds international public consultations before implementing any tariff adjustments. This process includes: 1. Publication of Proposals: The ACP publishes proposed tariff changes so that all interested parties can review the details. 2. Reception of Feedback: Clients, maritime associations, and port operators can submit comments, suggestions, or concerns. 3. Public Hearings: Open hearings are held where participants can directly express their opinions. 4. Analysis and Adjustments: The ACP reviews the feedback received and adjusts the proposal if necessary. 5. Approval and Communication: After approval by the Board of Directors, the final tariff is publicly announced with sufficient notice. Tariffs are applied equally to all countries, regardless of nationality. If the United States or any other country wishes to seek preferential rates or propose adjustments, they are encouraged to participate in the international public consultations conducted by the ACP. This is the official and transparent process for submitting suggestions or concerns about tariff structures. Active participation in these consultations is the proper way to influence tariff decisions, as the Panama Canal is committed to maintaining fairness, equity, and transparency in its operations.

[@pracliu1268]

What treaties? only trump greed

[@ulise0928]

@@BobPruett Everything You Didn’t Know About the Panama Canal (But Decided to Have an Opinion Anyway) The setting of tariffs for the Panama Canal is conducted in a transparent and public manner. The Panama Canal Authority (ACP) holds international public consultations before implementing any tariff adjustments. This process includes: 1. Publication of Proposals: The ACP publishes proposed tariff changes so that all interested parties can review the details. 2. Reception of Feedback: Clients, maritime associations, and port operators can submit comments, suggestions, or concerns. 3. Public Hearings: Open hearings are held where participants can directly express their opinions. 4. Analysis and Adjustments: The ACP reviews the feedback received and adjusts the proposal if necessary. 5. Approval and Communication: After approval by the Board of Directors, the final tariff is publicly announced with sufficient notice. Tariffs are applied equally to all countries, regardless of nationality. If the United States or any other country wishes to seek preferential rates or propose adjustments, they are encouraged to participate in the international public consultations conducted by the ACP. This is the official and transparent process for submitting suggestions or concerns about tariff structures. Additionally, if the United States is interested in port operations related to the Panama Canal, it is worth questioning why they did not participate in the public bidding processes for port concessions. These bidding opportunities were open and transparent, allowing any country or company to compete fairly for involvement in port operations. Furthermore, the security excuse that the United States is currently presenting could jeopardize global trade. By trying to impose restrictions under the guise of security concerns, they risk disrupting the smooth flow of goods through one of the world’s most crucial trade routes, potentially affecting economies worldwide. Panama has always prioritized neutrality in global conflicts and does not want to be dragged into the ongoing tensions between the United States and China. We remain committed to keeping our role as a neutral and peaceful facilitator of global commerce, just as we have always done throughout our history. Well, it seems some in the United States need a little reminder: the Panama Canal was built in Panama, not the United States. So, while some may want to give orders, it might be good to remember we’re talking about Panamanian territory, not another state of the union. Trying to command on foreign soil really has its bold touch, doesn’t it? Active participation in both consultations and bidding processes is the proper way to influence decisions, as the Panama Canal is committed to maintaining fairness, equity, and transparency in its operations.

[@ulise0928]

@@BobPruett Everything You Didn’t Know About the Panama Canal (But Decided to Have an Opinion Anyway) The setting of tariffs for the Panama Canal is conducted in a transparent and public manner. The Panama Canal Authority (ACP) holds international public consultations before implementing any tariff adjustments. This process includes: 1. Publication of Proposals: The ACP publishes proposed tariff changes so that all interested parties can review the details. 2. Reception of Feedback: Clients, maritime associations, and port operators can submit comments, suggestions, or concerns. 3. Public Hearings: Open hearings are held where participants can directly express their opinions. 4. Analysis and Adjustments: The ACP reviews the feedback received and adjusts the proposal if necessary. 5. Approval and Communication: After approval by the Board of Directors, the final tariff is publicly announced with sufficient notice. Tariffs are applied equally to all countries, regardless of nationality. If the United States or any other country wishes to seek preferential rates or propose adjustments, they are encouraged to participate in the international public consultations conducted by the ACP. This is the official and transparent process for submitting suggestions or concerns about tariff structures. Additionally, if the United States is interested in port operations related to the Panama Canal, it is worth questioning why they did not participate in the public bidding processes for port concessions. These bidding opportunities were open and transparent, allowing any country or company to compete fairly for involvement in port operations. Furthermore, the security excuse that the United States is currently presenting could jeopardize global trade. By trying to impose restrictions under the guise of security concerns, they risk disrupting the smooth flow of goods through one of the world’s most crucial trade routes, potentially affecting economies worldwide. Panama has always prioritized neutrality in global conflicts and does not want to be dragged into the ongoing tensions between the United States and China. We remain committed to keeping our role as a neutral and peaceful facilitator of global commerce, just as we have always done throughout our history. Well, it seems some in the United States need a little reminder: the Panama Canal was built in Panama, not the United States. So, while some may want to give orders, it might be good to remember we’re talking about Panamanian territory, not another state of the union. Trying to command on foreign soil really has its bold touch, doesn’t it? Active participation in both consultations and bidding processes is the proper way to influence decisions, as the Panama Canal is committed to maintaining fairness, equity, and transparency in its operations.

[@THEGREATAFFILIATOR]

Alternate title: How the US can take something that doesn't belong to it

[@rmorse5293]

I know the US should have never built it. Panama should have done it themselves, and then there wouldn't be a problem. Panama should manage the canal by themselves.

[@DriverJX]

@@rmorse5293 We already expanded the canal and the locks are 3 times bigger than the original locks you built (4,800 TEUs vs 12,600 TEUs), also, if you build a pool in the neighbors backyard, is it your pool? (The answer is no, and don't try to cope to that)

[@ilonkastille2993]

@@rmorse5293 Panama COULD not do it themselves and it was of great importance to have a shorter route. The French who started building it , could not finish it and left it . They had been successful in building the Suez Canal.

[@rmorse5293]

@ilonkastille2993 I know all that. I was being sarcastic. I was a Naval engineer stationed in Panama.

[@rmorse5293]

@DriverJX So we should drain the pool?

[@keithhoward4069]

Security of the canal is one of the clauses for the US to regain control of the canal according to news reports.

[@ulise0928]

The setting of tariffs for the Panama Canal is conducted in a transparent and public manner. The Panama Canal Authority (ACP) holds international public consultations before implementing any tariff adjustments. This process includes: 1. Publication of Proposals: The ACP publishes proposed tariff changes so that all interested parties can review the details. 2. Reception of Feedback: Clients, maritime associations, and port operators can submit comments, suggestions, or concerns. 3. Public Hearings: Open hearings are held where participants can directly express their opinions. 4. Analysis and Adjustments: The ACP reviews the feedback received and adjusts the proposal if necessary. 5. Approval and Communication: After approval by the Board of Directors, the final tariff is publicly announced with sufficient notice. Tariffs are applied equally to all countries, regardless of nationality. If the United States or any other country wishes to seek preferential rates or propose adjustments, they are encouraged to participate in the international public consultations conducted by the ACP. This is the official and transparent process for submitting suggestions or concerns about tariff structures. Active participation in these consultations is the proper way to influence tariff decisions, as the Panama Canal is committed to maintaining fairness, equity, and transparency in its operations.

[@pracliu1268]

Yeah yeah, excuses for inv*sion. Also in Afghan no?

[@ulise0928]

Everything You Didn’t Know About the Panama Canal (But Decided to Have an Opinion Anyway) The setting of tariffs for the Panama Canal is conducted in a transparent and public manner. The Panama Canal Authority (ACP) holds international public consultations before implementing any tariff adjustments. This process includes: 1. Publication of Proposals: The ACP publishes proposed tariff changes so that all interested parties can review the details. 2. Reception of Feedback: Clients, maritime associations, and port operators can submit comments, suggestions, or concerns. 3. Public Hearings: Open hearings are held where participants can directly express their opinions. 4. Analysis and Adjustments: The ACP reviews the feedback received and adjusts the proposal if necessary. 5. Approval and Communication: After approval by the Board of Directors, the final tariff is publicly announced with sufficient notice. Tariffs are applied equally to all countries, regardless of nationality. If the United States or any other country wishes to seek preferential rates or propose adjustments, they are encouraged to participate in the international public consultations conducted by the ACP. This is the official and transparent process for submitting suggestions or concerns about tariff structures. Additionally, if the United States is interested in port operations related to the Panama Canal, it is worth questioning why they did not participate in the public bidding processes for port concessions. These bidding opportunities were open and transparent, allowing any country or company to compete fairly for involvement in port operations. Furthermore, the security excuse that the United States is currently presenting could jeopardize global trade. By trying to impose restrictions under the guise of security concerns, they risk disrupting the smooth flow of goods through one of the world’s most crucial trade routes, potentially affecting economies worldwide. Panama has always prioritized neutrality in global conflicts and does not want to be dragged into the ongoing tensions between the United States and China. We remain committed to keeping our role as a neutral and peaceful facilitator of global commerce, just as we have always done throughout our history. Active participation in both consultations and bidding processes is the proper way to influence decisions, as the Panama Canal is committed to maintaining fairness, equity, and transparency in its operations.

[@keithhoward4069]

@pracliu1268 we built the canal for trade AND security. So we could quickly and safely transport our warships between oceans. We cannot allow our primary enemy to control it. If Panama is selling out our security, we will repossess what WE made. The only reason Panama still exists is because of what the US did for them.

[@user-te9ut7ms4l]

AFTER THEY U.S. DIDNT WANT TO PAY TO MAINTAIN IT AND PANAMA HAD TO REBUILD THE ENTIRE CANAL TO HANDLE THE BIGGER SHIPS.

[@Malomundo]

The USA paid 375 million dollars to build the canal. In 63 years of being in control of the canal the USA made over 50 billion dollars on the Panama Canal. It was a sixty year lease, the USA never owned the Panama canal. Panama is very clear the canal is not for sale. Selling their canal is like the USA selling Wall Street.

[@jameshepburn4631]

Commenter makes obvious the huge loss in value from the 1908 Dollar down to the 1998 Dollar for which Peanut Man Carter bears a lot of responsibility. Jimmy couldn’t figure out you can’t spend $5 when you only have $3 and printing $$$$$ backed only by wishful thinking destroys the value of both current earnings and life savings. Inflationary price increases under Carter were humongous, just like under Jimmy’s admirer & understudy senile Joe Biden. When Jimmy branched off from his segregated church to the Oval Office he began his unbroken string of failures which included gifting away one of the world’s critical sea gates. That people fell for such an incompetent air bag as Carter helps begin to comprehend how the Egyptians worshiped an insect.

[@Kaiserboo1871]

Panama wouldn’t even exist without the United States.

[@keithhoward4069]

@Malomundo It is nothing like selling wall street. Wall Street could move to any major city. The Panama canal is a rare structure the US Built after helping create and secure Panama. Sorry, but the US is not going to let it be controlled by a hostile nation. Get China out or we will take it back.

[@christophermorris6386]

Who said buying it. National security would mandate we take it from them whether they want to return it or not. Our military needs access to that canal.

[@rogerzimet]

@@christophermorris6386 And the rest of Latin America will just watch, according to you?

[@pacificrider08]

This was an informative interview. Finally, the thinkers are allowed once more to share awareness for the citizens they are sworn to protect.

[@PetClipdog]

CHINA doesn't need Army to Expande around the WOLD.

[@romecarl]

PANAMÁ CANAL IS NOT FOR SALE, NOT NOW, NOT EVER!

[@vvolfbelorven7084]

I’m Panamanian. Yeah, no. We’re not giving up the Panama Canal. For anyone who is just learning about the Panama Canal, what the 1st and 2nd amendment mean to Americans, that’s what the Panama Canal means to us. US can even try to get it militarily, but no chance in hell it can hold on to it. We’d go back to where we are now. The Panama Canal is Panamanian or there is no canal

[@AbsurdProphecyPraiseGod]

Give God the Honor! God is the Beautiful King who fights for his people! God Protects Trump and the people! God loves us and He is For Us!! I love you God! Thankyou for being unstoppable and making the impossible happen! Thankyou for Trump and all the Trump people! Hallelujah,! ⚡⚡⚡Glory to God⚡⚡⚡ "We will not Forget Our God!" ~Trump

[@jameshuffman835]

Panama reniged on their agreement! Enforce the treaty that returned control!

[@guillermogouldburn763]

False. That's just an excuse to to invade. Remember "weapons of mass destruction"?

[@janetprice85]

Exactly. Get China out of the western hemisphere and Russia out of the international sea lanes in the Artic.

[@Medina-xh2mz]

Your dumb bro, that's not true.... Trump is just saying BullShit. With out any proof..

[@FernandoGonzalez-gd3rw]

@@jameshuffman835 jajajaja that is fongo bullshit

[@MrMorristhecatp]

American ignorance is bliss

[@intrees-rx3nr]

Go for it. Make America great again.

[@saveamericanfreedom2400]

Read the document. The sale back to Panama had a stipulation. The safety and security of the American Homeland was part of that deal. Panama has failed to uphold the deal.

[@abellseaman4114]

AGREED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Panama is NOT FREE to hand over the Canal to whomever they please!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[@AydiliaraAyarza]

Panama control the Panamá Canal and Panamá is a sovereign country. Get over it! PANAMA FOR PANAMANIANS.

[@jamesbennett905]

No they didn't. They still run and protect the canal.

[@abellseaman4114]

@@AydiliaraAyarza Panama would still be a PROVINCE OF COLUMBIA if it were not for the Yankees!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Panama WAS HAPPY with the deal - its just they cannot SELL THE CANAL TO CHINA!!!!!!!!!!

[@rickss69]

You obviously have not read the document lol. There is nothing about the "American Homeland" in it.

[@kharoubhachemi9630]

To secure your country you have to secure your surroundings

[@pracliu]

And not inv*ding your allies

[@prophetseven728]

⁠@pracliuNot an ally if they betray us and are in bed with the enemy

[@JuuxieyRuovlt]

@pracliu Panama chooses China over USA so Panama is no longer an US ally.

[@vvolfbelorven7084]

@ The level of ignorance is astounding. US chose China over Taiwan under Nixon. Panama chose China over Tawain recently too, but no one is replacing the US.

[@prophetseven728]

@@vvolfbelorven7084 We are now moving into a New Age. Under Trump. Peace is already happening

[@5555emerson]

This was a fantastic interview, thank you.

[@fjm1235]

The treaty governing the canal handover has provisions to take it back. Letting the Chicoms establish the presence they have on the canal is reason enough to exercise those provisions. Full stop.

[@neilbrown2948]

nope.

[@jamesw1659]

@@neilbrown2948 Well, actually, yep.

[@denisesalt9729]

What is a Chicom?

[@familia6162-r4g]

Panama owes the US trillions of dollars if they want to rightfully own the canal period and remember plus interest over 20 years! Panama pay up or step aside NTE 90 days!

[@davidsylvester2543]

I have an idea. We could give Panama their dollar back.

[@fercaspmacascoarias]

you think the US dollar is the only currency in the world?

[@mayorsman0417]

⁠who’s currency would you rather possess?

[@davidsylvester2543]

@@fercaspmacascoarias Who does?

[@vvolfbelorven7084]

@@mayorsman0417Gold

[@gregoriamariaortega3873]

A dollar for your dreams,,

[@edh9237]

Keep in mind the canal is not just an economic concern. Controlling the canal area also controls migration north by land to the USA from southern countries.

[@gregoriamariaortega3873]

😂the Panama canal area is in the middle of Panama, not in the Panama Colombia border unless the USA wants to take control over the whole country,,that will never happen

[@edh9237]

@gregoriamariaortega3873 clearly you have no concept of negotiations.

[@gregoriamariaortega3873]

@@edh9237 negotiations with the one who said it would take it by force if it necessary

[@ricardosoto5770]

The Canal has no part in ilegal migration. They go by land..the problem is tje Darien gap..Panama wants to close that and has refused Colombian plans to build a highway. But it lack the resourses to stop all the migrants. The US shall start with that.. During Donald Trumo first period the Us has military and ICE peoole working close with Panamanian police..now its seems to alienate first.them negociate.

[@edh9237]

@@ricardosoto5770 Yes and No. We shall watch and see what happens.

[@CharlesLee-m4f]

A US Naval Blockade!

[@geoms6263]

or raising taxes for US by 40 %

[@CharlesLee-m4f]

@geoms6263 How? They already have the equipment. Largest Military in the World!

[@JS-vl5gd]

US Naval bloodbath.

[@thomasvilla6109]

@@CharlesLee-m4f - The China navy is not a blue water navy. China cannot survive for ore than several months without a constant flow of imports of oil, coal, fertilizer, food, etc., all of which the US Navy and allies could cut off in the event of conflict.

[@CharlesLee-m4f]

@@thomasvilla6109 What I'm saying is this. Canada is already an economic and military protectorate of the United States. Canada has no power to resist the will of the US. Only the internal political will of the US prevents Canada from being completely taken over by the US.

[@bhoustonjr]

I live in Panama..... The PLA is absolutely here. We have Chinese military age men when they come into Panama get sent to PLA camps before being sent on to the US southern border.

[@SGomez3050]

Just take it back. What is Panama going to do?

[@cwpress-w1g]

you must have an mos

[@FernandoGonzalez-gd3rw]

The same thing Vietnam did.

[@AnthonyPutnam-j8q]

​​@@FernandoGonzalez-gd3rw imagine, " Vietnam " Panama against 2025USA military technology 😂

[@pracliu1268]

@@AnthonyPutnam-j8q Yes, how many year in Afghanistan again

[@ulise0928]

Everything You Didn’t Know About the Panama Canal (But Decided to Have an Opinion Anyway) The setting of tariffs for the Panama Canal is conducted in a transparent and public manner. The Panama Canal Authority (ACP) holds international public consultations before implementing any tariff adjustments. This process includes: 1. Publication of Proposals: The ACP publishes proposed tariff changes so that all interested parties can review the details. 2. Reception of Feedback: Clients, maritime associations, and port operators can submit comments, suggestions, or concerns. 3. Public Hearings: Open hearings are held where participants can directly express their opinions. 4. Analysis and Adjustments: The ACP reviews the feedback received and adjusts the proposal if necessary. 5. Approval and Communication: After approval by the Board of Directors, the final tariff is publicly announced with sufficient notice. Tariffs are applied equally to all countries, regardless of nationality. If the United States or any other country wishes to seek preferential rates or propose adjustments, they are encouraged to participate in the international public consultations conducted by the ACP. This is the official and transparent process for submitting suggestions or concerns about tariff structures. Additionally, if the United States is interested in port operations related to the Panama Canal, it is worth questioning why they did not participate in the public bidding processes for port concessions. These bidding opportunities were open and transparent, allowing any country or company to compete fairly for involvement in port operations. Furthermore, the security excuse that the United States is currently presenting could jeopardize global trade. By trying to impose restrictions under the guise of security concerns, they risk disrupting the smooth flow of goods through one of the world’s most crucial trade routes, potentially affecting economies worldwide. Panama has always prioritized neutrality in global conflicts and does not want to be dragged into the ongoing tensions between the United States and China. We remain committed to keeping our role as a neutral and peaceful facilitator of global commerce, just as we have always done throughout our history. Active participation in both consultations and bidding processes is the proper way to influence decisions, as the Panama Canal is committed to maintaining fairness, equity, and transparency in its operations.

[@ilonkastille2993]

Try and stop the Chinese having a hold on the CANAL.

[@junoj2836]

Great clarity and perspective by the guest congressman.

[@ulise0928]

Everything You Didn’t Know About the Panama Canal (But Decided to Have an Opinion Anyway) The setting of tariffs for the Panama Canal is conducted in a transparent and public manner. The Panama Canal Authority (ACP) holds international public consultations before implementing any tariff adjustments. This process includes: 1. Publication of Proposals: The ACP publishes proposed tariff changes so that all interested parties can review the details. 2. Reception of Feedback: Clients, maritime associations, and port operators can submit comments, suggestions, or concerns. 3. Public Hearings: Open hearings are held where participants can directly express their opinions. 4. Analysis and Adjustments: The ACP reviews the feedback received and adjusts the proposal if necessary. 5. Approval and Communication: After approval by the Board of Directors, the final tariff is publicly announced with sufficient notice. Tariffs are applied equally to all countries, regardless of nationality. If the United States or any other country wishes to seek preferential rates or propose adjustments, they are encouraged to participate in the international public consultations conducted by the ACP. This is the official and transparent process for submitting suggestions or concerns about tariff structures. Additionally, if the United States is interested in port operations related to the Panama Canal, it is worth questioning why they did not participate in the public bidding processes for port concessions. These bidding opportunities were open and transparent, allowing any country or company to compete fairly for involvement in port operations. Furthermore, the security excuse that the United States is currently presenting could jeopardize global trade. By trying to impose restrictions under the guise of security concerns, they risk disrupting the smooth flow of goods through one of the world’s most crucial trade routes, potentially affecting economies worldwide. Panama has always prioritized neutrality in global conflicts and does not want to be dragged into the ongoing tensions between the United States and China. We remain committed to keeping our role as a neutral and peaceful facilitator of global commerce, just as we have always done throughout our history. Active participation in both consultations and bidding processes is the proper way to influence decisions, as the Panama Canal is committed to maintaining fairness, equity, and transparency in its operations.

[@angelavelasquez1483]

The Panamá Canal belong to Panamá. Is bullying call leverage now day? What ever happened to diplomacy and decency

[@toomanycrows6138]

How will this fix inflation and reduce the cost of living

[@charlesmclaughlin6968]

The issue is that China is trying to take over control of the Panama Canal, which would threaten our national security and also raise the price of shipping to the United States, since it's the only connection between the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans.

[@toomanycrows6138]

@ 1. How is China trying to take over the Panama Canal if Trump is the one that wants to take it back? 2. How does China controlling the Canal affect inflation?

[@americanagsolutions]

@@toomanycrows6138 Your argument is a weak one. Does someone really have to explain to you the obvious strategic importance of the Panama Canal?

[@toomanycrows6138]

@@americanagsolutions I didn’t make any argument. I just had a question. I guess the anti-media crowd isn’t well informed

[@galop13ful]

@@charlesmclaughlin6968 How is China trying to take control over it?

[@kevinkranz9156]

WE BUILT IT AND PAID FOR IT ITS OURS EFF PANAMA

[@DavidYbarra-c4u]

How about owning and controlling healthcare

[@seds94]

That too

[@jedmeadows6226]

How about sticking to the subject.

[@gregoriamariaortega3873]

That isn't a priority, for majestic cares about his own business

[@widayantosetio]

Start digging from california to florida and make your own canal 👍

[@josecanto9849]

How much ignorance and nonsense in the statements of this gentleman. The ports exist on both sides of the canal, not because of China, but because they won the tenders, and there are more than two. As they say, it seems that only Chinese ports exist, but there are ports owned by other companies from other parts of the world. If companies from the United States had bid, perhaps there would be a port owned by a company from the United States.

[@thomasvilla6109]

The company that operates the ports is a Hong Kong company. That presented no problem at all when Hong Kong was an independent, democratically-governed city-state. Now that HK is an indistinguishable part of Communist China, this presents a grave national security threat to the US and region. The situation has changed. President-elect Trump has placed the world on notice that the threat needs to be addressed. Rest assured it will be, preferably in some manner that is beneficial to both the citizens of Panama and the US.

[@LuisSouffront]

Are this companies are communist?

[@canismajoris3910]

@thomasvilla6109 - why is it that EVERYTHING is a THREAT to the US and everything is an National Security??

[@thomassenbart]

The difference being that all Chinese companies are quasi or directly controlled by the CCP and sure as proverbial shite, this move is a strategic one, not a business investment by China.

[@robertgoodson5528]

It's our canal... the end. There should be zero, non-Panamanian or American corporations running an American-made asset that's critical to our economic and national security. We didn't give it to them to let our adversaries gain control of it.

[@SuccessMindset2180]

Panama Canal was handled incompetently

[@LynasMacPherson-py2oh]

Carter's finally gone, but his legacy lives on.

[@gregoriamariaortega3873]

Who say that ElionTrump, Dictators gonna bes,,

[@samhavoc1066]

Based on what?

[@stevenbaptista8409]

Thanks for the info...❤peacealways

[@stevenwalker4923]

There were conditions that Panama had to meet to transfer and keep control of the Panama Canal. They clearly haven't met the conditions in the treaty.

[@garyyoung3179]

There is zero proof of that. The canal has functioned with the neutrality demanded by the treaty.

[@freindpanameno1160]

Como que no. Inclusive lo manejamos muchísimo mejor que ustedes, que hasta construimos otro Canal más grandes y eficiente que el que ustedes hicieron

[@abdielalexis19]

You have no clue of what are you talking about. Yes they meet all the conditions and all the countries and companies that use the Canal can back that information. Explain in your enormous ignorance what conditions the Panamanian government and the Panama Canal Authority do not meet? The first president that came with that lies in 25 years is Trump. Now we need to change the name of Gulf of Mexico to Gulf of America. And New Mexico to New America. How stupid is that. Who it’s going to be 4 long years

[@AydiliaraAyarza]

@@stevenwalker4923 and you believe everything that Fox News tells you....Good Luck.

[@Jarhead1968]

@@freindpanameno1160one thing you didn’t manage very well is the fees apparently. You want to charge us an unfair rate and then act offended when it brings trouble. Spare me your BS.

[@KarlaGonzalez-wi8qg]

America is a continent, not a country.

[@richconklin4134]

Just take and try to stop me, end of story. National security issues case closed.

[@hedleypanama]

In parallel, the Panama Canal Railroad went to shit when Panama administered it! A US-Canadian consortium rescue it! As Panamanian, I agree with the congressman: if US wants to buy the ports and its companies bring a better deal than Chinese ones... welcome!

[@XaviersAlternate]

@hedleypanama can you please use commas, I’m not interpreting this right

[@janetprice85]

@@hedleypanama The Chinese bring money for control of not just the Canal. Careful when you embrace brutal regimes as your friends. And the US is not into the CCP's behaviorr.Ask the Dalai Lama and Ugyers.

[@ckdub1888]

Lmao, ok so we build it and give it to you for free. Now you auction it to the highest bidder??? If that’s the extent of your gratitude and loyalty, then by all rights, we should just take it back.

[@seds94]

Who built the canal sir

[@gaylewilliams7158]

@@seds94 : It was BUILT mostly by black, Caribbean, men. It was designed and financed by the US.

[@peterwilliams1602]

The Panama Canal is for the Panama people not the USA.

[@agrossfarm]

China does not own BOTH ENDS of the Canal. There is more than ONE PORT on each side of the Canal. China has a contract to manage one on each side. The US could build their own port(s) if they signed a deal with Panama.

[@m.newton556]

Take it BACK!

[@corbiewhite7113]

What a novel concept. Instead of bullying people try negotiating in good faith

[@williamfowler616]

we can take it back and that would be the deal, or panama can do as they are told, the easy way or the hard way

[@agrossfarm]

@@williamfowler616 I am glad I do not live next door to you, with a nicer car and better house.

[@docjc9465]

Excellent information Well-delivered and reported Please teach NYT, WSJ , CNN etc

[@reloads223]

President Trump NEVER SAID HE WOULD USE THE MILITARY !

[@neilbrown2948]

he did

[@OpenCarryUSMC]

And you should note that he almost never rules it out.

[@mhxxd4]

He absolutely is willing to and we're completely fine with that. The canal needs to be widened!

[@neilbrown2948]

@@mhxxd4 new locks were finished in 2016.1200x160x50 feet deep ships fit through.

[@mhxxd4]

@ THAT'S STILL NOT BIG ENOUPH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Current ships are 1200x230x80ft and will only get bigger in the coming years, so they should be able to pass all current ships and the ones in the coming decades. Sorry but but the upgrades simply aren't enough! And in addition to size they need more throughput!

[@renzopinasco2206]

The difference with China is that they negotiate and cut deals, the US threatens with military internvention. When the US learns to negotiate, then they can talk. The warmonger rhetoric will always find resistance in all of latin america. The US was offered the construction of the ports and they declined the offer. The chinese took the opportinity. Learn to deal with your mistakes.

[@rickycosman33]

Panama is sovereign. Unless of course it's Pfizer and big pharma are going to give them money then sovereignty is not important. Let the few families that enjoy the $ from the canal go and defend it, the rest of the population will watch the show. And yes, the Torrijos-Carter treaties were clear-if the canal was threatened and it is. China has no business here. I was born in the Canal Zone.

[@gregoriamariaortega3873]

😂😂😂 Are you talking on behalf of young panameños who protests against the mines company or the people that think they deserve to get a free check from ACP??

[@caplejonesgozon6841]

THANKS. I know and Believe, you can make this MATTER'S.

[@seventhson27]

The U.S. engineered the independence of Panama from Columbia in order to build the canal.

[@sprak0792]

First of all, it's Colombia. Second of all, it was actually a frenchman who sold to the US the idea of separating Panama from Colombia.

[@prophetseven728]

United States should work on making a canal out of the Rio Grande.

[@lay1back]

Trump will make them an offer they can’t refuse.

[@MrMorristhecatp]

We want a trillion and you can take it back to Fla

[@keithedwards9953]

@@MrMorristhecatp How about 100 billion and everyone in North Panama moves to South Panama.

[@MrMorristhecatp]

@@keithedwards9953 North Panama and South Panama? What are you taking about?

[@keithedwards9953]

@@MrMorristhecatp figure it out.

[@MrMorristhecatp]

@@keithedwards9953 I don't know if English is your second language, but you must do better.

[@labethspain7936]

In 1880, a French company began construction on the Panamá canal. Over 20,000 men died during early construction. By 1902, the company had gone bankrupt and equipment and the uncompleted project was sold to America for $40 million. In 1903, in an American backed revolution, Panamá declared its independence from Columbia. President Teddy Roosevelt signed a treaty with Panamá in 1904, paying $10 million in exchange for a perpetual lease on the land with annual rent of $250,000. The cost of the canal was $375 million; almost 6000 men died, of which only 350 were white, American citizens; the canal was completed in 1914. Because a non-resident Panamanian representative had entered into negotiations without the formal consent of the new government, many Panamanians questioned the treaty’s validity; tensions continued to grow, culminating in a 1964 riot. By 1968, Panama’s president lost his election and in less thanks two weeks the new president was deposed in a military coup and negotiations had to begin again. In 1975, a new agreement was reached w/ President Ford: America was to be given permanent USE, but the control and upkeep of the canal would be given back to Panamá. Upgrades, paid by Panamá, were made and in 1976, and Reagan and Ford vied for president on the Republican ticket ~ Ford wanted to sign the treaty, Reagan did not. That year a Democrat (President Carter) was elected. President Carter signed the new treaty and the canal was turned over to Panamá. However a SECOND treaty was also signed, which gave America unrestricted access to the canal. We agreed to pay the same amount as other countries for transit, but if our access is threatened, our military has the right to step in and protect the canal. Since Latin America’s governments are inherently unstable, we continue to pay the same transit as any other country. However that amount is not as costly (politically or money wise) as control and upkeep ~ and we still have unrestricted access. Almost 6,000 men had died during construction ~ of which only 350 were white, American citizens. I find it interesting that during Trump’s 1st presidency, the Trump organization was “kicked out” of Panamá and forced to relinquish ownership of his international hotel/casino, which had become an unending scandal of bankruptcy and money laundering. And now in 2025, Trump demands the return of the canal to American control…so what do you think?

[@pracliu1268]

Exactly, down with Trump the Invader

[@gwenbates4456]

Wow!!!! Didn't know this!! But I figured there was an ulterior motive!! And using China as a smoke screen for his crimes🤦🏾‍♀️. God send your JUDGEMENT 🕊🕊🕊🙏🏾

[@lonecowboy789]

Trump's personal business aside. If China is running both ends of the Canal and anything happens do you really think China won't try to stop or disrupt shipping through the Canal? Also where's the proof we're paying the same as everyone else.

[@MarchHare59]

I think China should be forced to relinquish their interests in the region and leave Panama. If they can do it to a Trump Hotel, they can also do it to the Chinese companies in charge of the ports on either side of the canal, right? #goosemeetgander.

[@pracliu1268]

@@lonecowboy789 Where is the proof that it isn't?

[@siomi2701]

This isn’t 1492 nor 1942 ….. you can’t have it NO MEANS NO

[@michaelle7637]

Panama 🇵🇦 needs a new government now.

[@MrMorristhecatp]

Are you Panamanian?

[@gregoriamariaortega3873]

😂😂😂 I think your soon to be ,Dictators needs a psychiatric

[@ricardosoto5770]

Panama just elected a right wing pro (would be) Trump gob and Trump.comes around with lies and insults..thinking Panama has the same.gov it has 8 years ago that was doing some.hanky panky with the PCR.Panama until the was pro.Taiwan.

[@IsaacHaynes-k3u]

This was said in the "Washington Examiner " by Tim Nerzzoi dated Jan.11,2025 @ 8:PM. ..Quote: "Panama was made the first Latin American partner of the Chinese Communist Party’s Belt and Road Initiative in 2018.The Belt and Road Initiative is a long-term, international project of the Chinese government to facilitate easier global trade, expand CCP influence in foreign nations, and increase Chinese cultural exports." ...So tell me if the United States should not worry about the CCP expanding their influence in Panama? Yeah Right.

[@vvolfbelorven7084]

Quoting from a biased conservative source. Rich Panama is no more turning communist from trading with China than the US is.

[@ricardosoto5770]

Source: "I made it up"

[@Gungnir762]

The USA paid for the Canal.

[@neilbrown2948]

on stolen land.

[@tenshinjan9984]

Haha no you didn't. The French started it, then you finished it and then you gave it to Panama legally through a treaty.

[@bcwest56]

@@tenshinjan9984 Haha, the French failed in their attempt, because they did not have the technology or the funds to do the job. America did the job, but they also had to send medical teams to find and finally conquer the malaria and yellow fever problems. America paid for the Canal, with blood, sweat, and toil. Then Carter just gave it away for a lousy buck.

[@tenshinjan9984]

@bcwest56 Thanks for acknowledging that the US did not built it, they finished it. Please also note that less than 5% of the losses during the construction of the canal were Americans, most of them were Caribbeans, french, Hindus and from other Latin American countries. The US was a bad negotiator and still is today, the same way Russia negotiated poorly at the moment of selling you guys what today is Alaska. The US has to understand that Panama's strategy was smarter, that's why they won the political and diplomatic battle at that time and re-gained what was always theirs, because at the end, the canal is in Panamanian territory.

[@LynasMacPherson-py2oh]

The united states paid for the panama canal in about twenty five different ways.

[@orosalsero]

The French started the Panama canal and the entire French nation almost went bankrupt over it's construction, then they sold it to America which spent millions on top of millions on it's construction and on fighting mosquito borne malaria, so technically and financially America owns the Panama canal unless Panama wishes to reimburse the USA for all the money she spent on it's construction and medical proficiencies.

[@rickss69]

Check your history. The sale of the land/canal was drawn up without a single Panamanian present or signature. The original transfer was not even presented to Panama, but rather to Columbia. Go pry Mr Peanut out of his casket if you wish to lodge a complaint lol.

[@freindpanameno1160]

Ya Panamá le pago eso y con intereses, para que tenga un norte.

[@alexz5508]

100 years of the US getting that money while controlling the Panama Canal on Panamanian land, its more than reimbursed, think again

[@abdielalexis19]

Yes, and USA benefits and control the canal for 85 years. They recover their investment. Plus the canal is in Panamanian soil not America. The Canal is property of the Panamanian government for 25 years. If we going to star not respecting international treaties the consequences will be catastrophic for the world. In this point if USA do that China can take Taiwan “ for National Security “ good way to star WW3

[@AydiliaraAyarza]

@@orosalsero The Panamá Canal has been expanded to twice its size since the Americans handed it over. It was an investment in which Americans did not participante at all. Americans are just inventing a narrative. PANAMA FOR PANAMANIANS!

[@BP-1988]

So when is Trump going to prioritize the issues that got him elected such has lowering the price of groceries, reducing interest rates, and make housing more affordable? And why is he talking about taking back the Panama Canal, making Canada a state, and annexing Greenland now and not before the election?

[@CERTIFIEDAMERICAN1]

WE ARE THE RIGHTFUL OWNERS OF GREENLAND, CANADA AND PANAMA CANAL

[@danielpicassomunoz2752]

Don't forget the moon, Antarctica, mars... Why not the sun eh?

[@thesenate1844]

Must be hard typing so much to not be sent to Ukraine

[@neilbrown2948]

Only if you are 100%indeginous.

[@MrMorristhecatp]

Pff

[@CERTIFIEDAMERICAN1]

@@thesenate1844 MANIFEST DESTINY: GOD HAS GIVEN US THE RIGHT TO RULE THE WORLD..

[@wheelmanstan]

get our canal back, get greenland into the u.s., secure our borders, end the wars, replace gavin newsome with an actual leader

[@raptor2264]

Hate to break to you but Panama 🇵🇦 isn't going to negotiate over the canal. So good luck with that.

[@americanagsolutions]

They have no leverage in the negotiation. They will be forced, economically, to hand it back.

[@raptor2264]

@@americanagsolutions I understand that still they won't hand it over no matter how hard they try. Forced, economic, etc.

[@farson67]

They better think it over, Panama would take 2 weeks, 3 tops.

[@Carol.Allison]

Exactly it's just a US pipe dream that's never going to happen

[@GilAlberding]

Let’s free Noriega, install him as president again with condition he give us the canal!😂😂

[@lloydpk6302]

What about the fact that the part of the canal that makes the most money, was built by Panama on its own. Are they going to keep those locks, and the US the old ones? Why are this clowns not talking about this at all?

[@BrianLawrence-vk3pu]

Trump is President of the United States FIRST! And a damn good one at that. His business acumen makes him more economically brilliant than previous.

[@pracliu1268]

Tw*tter bot

[@gregoriamariaortega3873]

😂😂😂

[@keithhoward4069]

@@pracliu1268 you are admitting it?

[@sheepdoglogic]

If anyone can get the deal done, it is President Trump! HOOAH!!!

[@robertpeers3742]

All I can say is ..Don't F with Trump.

[@josepineda501]

He will get USA in trouble if he invade Panama .

[@neilbrown2948]

he does a good enough job at that on his own

[@jamesw1659]

@@josepineda501 If he gets involved, there might not BE a Panama.

[@danielleczinsky1868]

I served in Panama in 1980. 4/10th Infantry. I think if our Politicians really look into the Agreement Carter made, there is a part that gives us the right to retake it if Panama doesn't do us right.

[@vvolfbelorven7084]

Define “doesnt do us right” People hear Trump talk about the Panama Canal and now everyone’s an expert

[@willkwok9219]

You are Dems against America. You will block Jefferson from purchase land. You blindly against everything. Wake up​@@vvolfbelorven7084

[@gregoriamariaortega3873]

So you know how Panamanian people can't not even enter the canal areas , so many inocents students got kill by Americans in their own soil, January ,1964, and,Panama invasion so called JUST CAUSE to get only one men Noriega ,more than 1,500 civilians died , and now Trump pretent to take the Panama canal by force if necessary, ?? Do you know Trump loss the Trump international hotel and suites in Panama city Panama for tax evasion and fraud 2017-19(facts) go ahead and get the information Google it.he wants revenge and power over allies countries. Millions of civilians Panamanians people are ready to die,Panama doesn't have military army

[@ricardosoto5770]

Actually the theaty says inf the passage is endangered. AND IS NOT.

[@westcoast1776]

All Hail USA!

[@Jim_Curtis]

The U S. should stop giving money to Panama

[@tuyquienmas]

They dont freak and also there is no "chinese soldiers" running the canal 😂

[@gregoriamariaortega3873]

They give a dime ,only give Panama pennies for the use of the military bases and the use of the Panama canal annual fee $500,00 that so

[@tuyquienmas]

@@gregoriamariaortega3873 there is no military bases in Panama since 1999 🤣

[@gregoriamariaortega3873]

​​​@@tuyquienmasI know, I am talking before 1977 ,when the USA administrate the Panama canal

[@PolicalCentral2.0-fe1fp]

Canadians must elect Conservative Pierre Poilievre for Prime minister in 2025. He is a PRO LIFE. PRO LIFE. And Canada will not be in the 51st state. And British Columbia & Nova Scotia will Split Canada in half and both will be for sale!

[@neilbrown2948]

trump lite.....nope.

[@LynasMacPherson-py2oh]

You're absolutely right what canada needs right no it is a canadian donald trump.

[@jamesparker3189]

I feel for the people of China because they are suffering from the actions taken by their government, They are experiencing the beginnings of a Great Depression. Xi is not making good decisions.

[@AlVilla-xi9zo]

Listen to Trump Period!

[@JasonLoftis-w4z]

Trump will handle them 😊

[@tenshinjan9984]

No he won't☺️

[@JasonLoftis-w4z]

@ he will and already many leaders are running to him! Trump definitely makes the world better

[@tuyquienmas]

He couldnt even keep his hotel in Panama 😂

[@JasonLoftis-w4z]

@@tuyquienmaswe shall see 😊

[@gregoriamariaortega3873]

Like he handled the health insurance policy and education, dru,violence, mental health care and housing problems, US can even control California fires 🔥 firefighters from Mexico and others countries are helping there

[@micaelcaruso6489]

The Panama Canal should be American 🇺🇸 the border.

[@MarchHare59]

If Beijing has no control over the Chinese companies that own the ports on either side of the Panama Canal as they say, then they should have no problem with Panama telling them they have to sell their interest in the ports and leave the region. And if the reverse is true and Xi does object, then it proves the PRC is in control of the Panama Canal after all and Panama is obligated under the treaty that guaranteed the canal's neutrality force them out or risk the U.S. taking the canal back. The decision is really up to Panama but the end result will be the same. China has to leave Panama.

[@phelephant2928]

Why would Panama want china out? They’ve been nothing but good.

[@ricardosoto5770]

The problem is the US..the US has gotten out.of the civilan port bussiness. You kick Hutchison put and the new bid will be won by another chinese, Taiwanese, Singaporean or Corean company. The US thanks the Longshoremen Union cannot run a modern port properly..the Donald should start there.

[@ilonkastille2993]

Panama will not dare to counter the Chinese.

[@djxcel23]

We need to produce things here

[@HappyGermanShepherd-xi5sq]

Have you noticed the average "work ethic" lately?

[@gaylewilliams7158]

@@HappyGermanShepherd-xi5sq : Yeah, it blows my mind that it is cheaper to buy products shipped from the other side of the world than it is to buy the same products made in the USA. It's partly because of slave-like labor, and stronger work ethics, in other countries.

[@abellseaman4114]

Apparently you are NOT AWARE of just how much stuff is shipped from Pacific coast to Atlantic coast as part of the North American economies!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Having that rtade blocked by Beijing Bullies WOULD NOT be a good thing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[@TerryPringle]

Why do America first need canal clownish

[@drippyrubzz8994]

No we don't

[@stevethomas2022]

All he has to do is drop 3 hundred thousand troops back into the country.

[@user-tl7kl5vb2u]

Take it back!!🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

[@MrMorristhecatp]

The Panama canal is not own by the government of Panama and by constitution cannot be sold.

[@MarzLast]

theres a contract panama need give it back for misuse .

[@abellseaman4114]

AGREED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Panama must not be permitted to let the vital Canal come under control of the Beijing bullies!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[@AydiliaraAyarza]

So....Panamanians have to give it to the American Bullies instead. Hahaha. What a bunch of nonsense.

[@neilbrown2948]

Trump never lives up to his contracts so why should anyone else.

[@ulise0928]

@MarzLast Everything You Didn’t Know About the Panama Canal (But Decided to Have an Opinion Anyway) The setting of tariffs for the Panama Canal is conducted in a transparent and public manner. The Panama Canal Authority (ACP) holds international public consultations before implementing any tariff adjustments. This process includes: 1. Publication of Proposals: The ACP publishes proposed tariff changes so that all interested parties can review the details. 2. Reception of Feedback: Clients, maritime associations, and port operators can submit comments, suggestions, or concerns. 3. Public Hearings: Open hearings are held where participants can directly express their opinions. 4. Analysis and Adjustments: The ACP reviews the feedback received and adjusts the proposal if necessary. 5. Approval and Communication: After approval by the Board of Directors, the final tariff is publicly announced with sufficient notice. Tariffs are applied equally to all countries, regardless of nationality. If the United States or any other country wishes to seek preferential rates or propose adjustments, they are encouraged to participate in the international public consultations conducted by the ACP. This is the official and transparent process for submitting suggestions or concerns about tariff structures. Additionally, if the United States is interested in port operations related to the Panama Canal, it is worth questioning why they did not participate in the public bidding processes for port concessions. These bidding opportunities were open and transparent, allowing any country or company to compete fairly for involvement in port operations. Furthermore, the security excuse that the United States is currently presenting could jeopardize global trade. By trying to impose restrictions under the guise of security concerns, they risk disrupting the smooth flow of goods through one of the world’s most crucial trade routes, potentially affecting economies worldwide. Panama has always prioritized neutrality in global conflicts and does not want to be dragged into the ongoing tensions between the United States and China. We remain committed to keeping our role as a neutral and peaceful facilitator of global commerce, just as we have always done throughout our history. Well, it seems some in the United States need a little reminder: the Panama Canal was built in Panama, not the United States. So, while some may want to give orders, it might be good to remember we’re talking about Panamanian territory, not another state of the union. Trying to command on foreign soil really has its bold touch, doesn’t it? Panama has always considered the United States a valuable ally. However, with the current stance by Donald Trump, it makes one wonder whether the U.S. is truly interested in maintaining an alliance or if they are simply trying to reclaim land that never belonged to them. This shift in position raises serious questions about their intentions. And let’s not forget-Panama did not pay for the construction of the canal in money, but rather by being stripped of its territory. We were never properly compensated for what we lost. History should be revisited to fully understand the price Panama paid, which was far greater than any financial transaction. Active participation in both consultations and bidding processes is the proper way to influence decisions, as the Panama Canal is committed to maintaining fairness, equity, and transparency in its operations.

[@gregoriamariaortega3873]

People keep repeating the same nonsense lies, what about giving Trump his Trump international hotel and suites in Panama city Panama, that he loss for tax evasion and fraud 2017-19, what about that, that should make him happy

[@jimantonino4394]

We need the U.S. Military to occupy and operate. Canal Zone needs to be sovereign U.S. soil.

[@tommybyrd2123]

Do we give foreign aid to Panama?

[@anelcanto]

There are programs like USAID and other NGOs that might give a little money to certain causes here and there. But if all of those little aids were taken away it would have 0 effects on Panama. That ain’t some tiny village in Africa. During the 2008 resession us was hit bad but panamas economy fared pretty well comparatively. Panama just doesn’t live on credit as much as Americans. People don’t buy everything with credit cards as in us, people use debit cards for most things (by the way using debit cards/cash is the normal way to pay day to day-stuff outside of US)

[@ricardosoto5770]

Panama has higher minimun wages and GDP percapita than many Eastern European countries...like Rusia.

[@trumpsmarkethack5676]

He will do it with a false flag against the canal.

[@johnshields9511]

We are back baby! Trump! ✊️🇺🇲💪

[@hopenavajo1391]

Panama has put Russian ship under sanctions, that is why the convicted felon has threatened Panama to retake the canal,but Panama is not going backing off with his threats

[@michaelschortinghuis3390]

Doesn’t seem fascist

[@Primaate]

Learn what that term means perhaps.

[@michaelschortinghuis3390]

Populism meets industrialists seems to fit the bill.

[@LynasMacPherson-py2oh]

I really don't think you know what a fascist is.

[@GalateaPolifemo]

The Panamá Canal really belongs to Colombia. The US helped Panamá to independícese from Colombia to steal the Canal.

[@saveamericanfreedom2400]

Donald Trump knows that the people of Greenland have chosen to be part of America and protected by America. He will try to negotiate a deal first.

[@uberuberexperience5578]

they will have a house in Los Angeles and house in Greenland. sounds like a deal to me.

[@jimclarence5441]

Nonsense.

[@stockholm-vildmark]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/fZ2uZJlnmNiSopY

[@neilbrown2948]

pure utter horse cookies.

[@garymorris5974]

soon to be Trump Canal

[@ulise0928]

Everything You Didn’t Know About the Panama Canal (But Decided to Have an Opinion Anyway) The setting of tariffs for the Panama Canal is conducted in a transparent and public manner. The Panama Canal Authority (ACP) holds international public consultations before implementing any tariff adjustments. This process includes: 1. Publication of Proposals: The ACP publishes proposed tariff changes so that all interested parties can review the details. 2. Reception of Feedback: Clients, maritime associations, and port operators can submit comments, suggestions, or concerns. 3. Public Hearings: Open hearings are held where participants can directly express their opinions. 4. Analysis and Adjustments: The ACP reviews the feedback received and adjusts the proposal if necessary. 5. Approval and Communication: After approval by the Board of Directors, the final tariff is publicly announced with sufficient notice.

[@ulise0928]

Tariffs are applied equally to all countries, regardless of nationality. If the United States or any other country wishes to seek preferential rates or propose adjustments, they are encouraged to participate in the international public consultations conducted by the ACP. This is the official and transparent process for submitting suggestions or concerns about tariff structures. Additionally, if the United States is interested in port operations related to the Panama Canal, it is worth questioning why they did not participate in the public bidding processes for port concessions. These bidding opportunities were open and transparent, allowing any country or company to compete fairly for involvement in port operations.

[@ulise0928]

Furthermore, the security excuse that the United States is currently presenting could jeopardize global trade. By trying to impose restrictions under the guise of security concerns, they risk disrupting the smooth flow of goods through one of the world’s most crucial trade routes, potentially affecting economies worldwide. Panama has always prioritized neutrality in global conflicts and does not want to be dragged into the ongoing tensions between the United States and China. We remain committed to keeping our role as a neutral and peaceful facilitator of global commerce, just as we have always done throughout our history.

[@ulise0928]

Well, it seems some in the United States need a little reminder: the Panama Canal was built in Panama, not the United States. So, while some may want to give orders, it might be good to remember we’re talking about Panamanian territory, not another state of the union. Trying to command on foreign soil really has its bold touch, doesn’t it? Panama has always considered the United States a valuable ally. However, with the current stance by Donald Trump, it makes one wonder whether the U.S. is truly interested in maintaining an alliance or if they are simply trying to reclaim land that never belonged to them. This shift in position raises serious questions about their intentions.

[@ulise0928]

And let’s not forget-Panama did not pay for the construction of the canal in money, but rather by being stripped of its territory. We were never properly compensated for what we lost. History should be revisited to fully understand the price Panama paid, which was far greater than any financial transaction. Active participation in both consultations and bidding processes is the proper way to influence decisions, as the Panama Canal is committed to maintaining fairness, equity, and transparency in its operations.

[@chinaware_456]

You can see that the US is in Panic Mode already

[@Carol.Allison]

ExactIy non of this BS Dumpster is throwing out there never going to happen

[@larrylynn5047]

How about; We The People Buy It and let the Navy and Marines take care of it under #47....That way we can control all tariffs, at 200%.

[@rickss69]

No, the US can't take control of the Canal. Nothing in the Treaty has been broken nor does it give such authority. Military intervention by the US would constitute a violation of neutrality which in fact is worded in the document and Panama could act against the US accordingly...with the help of proxies likely.

[@uberuberexperience5578]

they will do it like Russia in Crimea. just walk in. They violate very treaty they signed. let's see what happens.

[@neilbrown2948]

@@uberuberexperience5578 and how is that working out for Russia.

[@takenacid000]

40% of the US trade? Well, the terms were to stay neutral to all, let's double the transit tariff for US and China then🤣. As a Panamanian, I would like to see this bully talk continue. Remember what happened with the Canadian copper mine Company in Panama?

[@jhrusa8125]

We're going to take the Panama canal. We'll also take Greenland, and whoever doesn't like it can do something about it.

[@janetprice85]

No one is going to take anything because we have a right to the Canal under the treaty and Greenland is on board with cooperating with us for security and trade reasons. They want to be an independent country.

[@jhrusa8125]

@janetprice85 The first thing we did in World War 2 was occupy Greenland and then occupied Iceland (who was already occupied by Britain). Then Britain occupied Aruba to keep the Germans away from the Venezuelan oilfields. Countries will do what they have to do.

[@FernandoGonzalez-gd3rw]

The US was in Panama for almost 100 years and never pay taxes not for the canal or the military bases ,is already pay for, is Panama canal not USA.

[@LuisSouffront]

You maybe be right but ,if you have a customer that give you 3/4 of you sustenance you better think twice before you live in 1/4 of your money haha that not F funny

[@FernandoGonzalez-gd3rw]

@LuisSouffront Panama belong to the world not the US.

[@MarchHare59]

@@FernandoGonzalez-gd3rw Or China. If you object to one, you shouldn't have a problem objecting to the other, right?

[@FernandoGonzalez-gd3rw]

@MarchHare59 Panama do not have problems with China .

[@LynasMacPherson-py2oh]

The american military protects panama, and we paid one trillion dollars for the canal.I think we've paid enough.

[@MAGAUSA25]

A united north america is gonna be beautiful sorry smaller nations we are expanding.

[@TerryPringle]

Orange boyking will have whole world cheesed at him

[@LynasMacPherson-py2oh]

Truthfully, the United States doesn't give a d*** what the world thinks.

[@alanaldpal950]

Simple…. Ban any ship that transits the canal from using (off loading) at any American port, or banning any product going thru the canal from coming to the USA. Momentary pain for long term gain.

[@ricardosoto5770]

Mexico would love.that.