Ford Ranger Wildtrak bi turbo Vs Volkswagen Amarok V6 580 comparison review

We pit the updated Ford Ranger Wildtrak bi-turbo against the big-power VW Amarok Ultimate 580 to find out which one's the pick on- and off-road and which one's got the better interior, and more.
Read our full written review: bit.ly/2YpbArL
New videos are uploaded weekly, never miss one again, subscribe to Practical Motoring's KZbin channel: goo.gl/HUniMu
Visit Practical Motoring's website at: practicalmotoring.com.au/
Practical Motoring is one of Australia's best-loved automotive portals with first drives, reviews and car buying and owning advice Australian's can trust.
LIKE us on Facebook: goo.gl/qomxL9
FOLLOW us on Twitter: goo.gl/9WxSMH
FOLLOW us on Instagram: goo.gl/AjRmVw

[@markloveridge4151]

Just bought the v6 Amarok what an awesome machine. All I can say is its soooooo effortless both on an off road .

[@ryanquinn5557]

A year in, Any trouble with it?

[@thatdoocoo5658]

4 years in over here Only trouble we’ve had with our 2016 model is the tires Then again, I’m 12 years old and I don’t know much about the payments of the vehicle But never has it ever broken down on us before so I would go for it!

[@tube-dude77]

Any comments on long drives, 500km and further??

[@kingkaiser7732]

I just picked up a 2021 Adventura. Awesome machine. Unlike other 4x4’s, it’s a pleasure to drive in urban areas

[@martinwolmarans1833]

😊😎nice. German engineering. Das Auto

[@In0centz]

My Amarok 580 comes in this week, can't wait!

[@motheomphela5474]

My ranger is in my garage

[@martinwolmarans1833]

Nice :) (For the Amarok, not the First on rubbish dump :) )

[@johnboy5167]

Typical Ford dribblers 😄

[@consider3794]

I have just spent 6 months test driving vehicles each one of the following for an entire weekend on and off-road., Nissan N trek, Mistsi Toby Price and Premium plus, Toyota Rugged x and Rogue, Ford Wild Trak and Wildtrak X, Amarok Ultimate and Dark label. It was tough between the Ford Wildrtraks and Amarok they were my finalists. In the end, the Amarok won for handling as it feels so much tighter on the road, both on bitumen and dirt. When I am hammering home from a long days work it simply feels stuck to the road in a way the others have not been able to capture yet. But what a time to live in we have such a range of 4wd's to choose from now that our parents and grandparents would be loving it. We are spoilt for choice. Merry Christmas.

[@DJTrumpMAGA]

You spent 6 months test driving utes on and “off-road” and in the end you went for the Amarok? When was the last time you saw a mental doctor?

[@dimitrisayfantis9111]

I own a Ranger for every day use in the city (Athens) and I can say that this is absolutely the best car I ever had!

[@user-hl9ln7mq5m]

ΚΑΙ ΕΓΩ ΕΧΩ ΤΟ WILDTRAK ΑΠΟ ΠΈΡΥΣΙ ΦΙΛΕ ΚΑΙ ΤΟ ΕΥΧΑΡΙΣΤΙΕΜΑΙ ΟΛΟ ΚΑΙ ΠΕΡΙΣΣΌΤΕΡΟ. ΑΡΓΟΣ ΜΕΡΙΑ.

[@Nik-tl1uk]

@@user-hl9ln7mq5m είναι απίστευτο αγροτικό κύριε Δημήτρη. Θέλουμε να πάρουμε ένα εσάς στο 2030 (wildtrak εννοείται )

[@gutadin5]

Dimitris what year is your Ranger? How's the reliability ?

[@Steve211Ucdhihifvshi]

Glad your happy but jeeze you musnt of had any good cars before...

[@pirpir3496]

Τέλειο αμάξι για πόλη. Για βουνό τι έχεις , panamera?

[@roba877]

I own a Ranger Wildtrack, having previously owned an Amarok and I can whole hardheartedly say the Ranger will run circles around the Amarok off road. The Amarok I had was useless off road but lovely to drive on it. It is far too car like for commercial use but does have the provenance of a German brand. The Ranger is a lot more practical for working, feels more rugged and robust, better value for money, cheaper to own, the only down side I have experienced is that the Roll Top cover is rubbish (and an expensive option), it is not water proof and does hinder your load space but otherwise good for keeping your tools out of view. .

[@strider88888]

Tried both - Had the Test Drive of the V6 Amarok for the weekend. The V6 is a beast. Bought a Highline almost 2 years ago.Brilliant vehicle. Only suggestions on a 58k vehicle - needs mirrors that retract, and rear air bags and leather seats. Beautiful to drive, can take a huge load. Though if Ford bought a F150 Raptor here I'd think about one. The Aussie modded V8 RAMS are great too, but just that little bit bigger.

[@concernedcitizen5506]

Ive had an ultimate 580 for nearly 3 years. It’s had engine issues and little gremlins. However it is similar to driving an expensive European suv. In fact its better in a lot of ways. Extremely quiet on the highway and handles awesome. It absolutely eats the beach and soft sand even with the low profile tyres. One of my staff has a current Wildtrack and it feels like a small truck when being in the passenger seat. Looking forward to the new model next year.

[@marinusscholtz9342]

Always the Amarok! Best by a long shot!

[@rossvickers4235]

I test drove so many cars including the new Merc as I’ve already got an AMG and wanted the ute to go with! However when I drove the Amarok I was blown away by the engine! Needless to say it wasn’t a hard choice to buy the Amarok! Love it and with a tune it’s as quick as GTI’s just about! With the upgrades on the engine etc it’s now at 230kw and 720nm!! It’s an absolute weapon!!

[@elvismadoda659]

Amarok is better than anything

[@greekgod2289]

Hi Ross, any issues with ECU upgrade and were you able to keep warranty? Any advice appreciated. Amarok is a no brainer to me as it has the best constant 4x4 transmission.

[@gympieknee]

Tuned my V6 and it now has 228Kw - up from 175kw (53Kw gain) 632 Nm - up from 523Nm (109Nm gain). It’s crazy.

[@phantomwalker8251]

all you young guns,know nothing..what is the low range ratio.THATS,what you need to know,not how fast it,ll get to the moon..i have a 6 cyl,tdi,no tech,no computer,no glow plugs,4.2tdi,german..with a tdo6,up from a tdo4.only change done.it has 170kw,700nm.gets 13 lt 100.in a 4t truck..IF,your am a rock,,had 1000nm,you idiots would still chip it.iF,& i doubt it,you EVER go 4x4ing,& it stops,your dead,or getting towed home.....

[@akuapiatas]

@@phantomwalker8251 yeah but it's a shitty 4.2tdi mate. I'm 67yrs old and have an Amarok 3.0, I had it retuned and it happily has 700Nm on tap and has towing power for days

[@phantomwalker8251]

@@akuapiatas yes,well,we will see how it is in 20 yrs..probably a door stopper..&, YOUR FKN AMEROK,IS NOT,,,,A 4WD..funny thing is,the same people that build your door stop,built my f250..achtung baby..you lose just one,,of your sensors,out bush,your dead,,i have no sensors,or computer..& have 700 nm..no help what so ever,so,,go suck..your a bit older than me,but not wiser..toyota 4.5tdi,has less nm,with a shit load more tech,,i have no tech..what does that tell you,plus i get more lt 100,than those b/s toyotas..& weigh 4t..EMPTY. something to do with tortois & hare i think..see you in another 20 yrs..

[@trevorevans7101]

Good review. Would be very happy with either. Just picked up the V4 Amarok for $39,000 (Australian dollars) Fantastic vehicle for the money.

[@Menck1]

But what about its reliability?

[@SkiRacingOz]

I4 not v4

[@emergingit]

Great way to finish off. Well done and great review. I've driven both and love the wide planted stance on the Amarok. The engine is in a class of it's own. The Hilux is the best off road but not so on road. The Ranger has the bells and whistles and sells well, it leads the high end 4WD sales. The Amarok has full time 4WD effectively and rear disc brakes and that's a massive safety feature over all of the 2WD utes that only have usable 4WD off road. I'll take full time all wheel drive all-day everyday. Horses for courses as the The Editor said we all can pick what we want.

[@PracticalmotoringAu]

Thanks Dean. Much appreciated.

[@vevohoeyo]

@fukthegoog hilux is plan and simple rubbish

[@alanmay7929]

vevohoeyo you are rubbish

[@proflynn]

Tried them both - bought a Wildtrak. Love it. Ranger every time

[@TimberdeckingnowAuDeckBuilders]

I drive an Amarok V6 Ultimate. Easily the the most comfortable and best handling Ute I have ever owned. That V6 is a sleeping giant killer!! With a custom tune the power and Torque figures are simply stunning.

[@angeloffroad1375]

Very good and unbiased review. I still do not think any UTE compare to the comfort and driveability of the Amarok.

[@stephenczislowski6865]

Great review! I’ll be putting my $ with Amarok

[@Sandra-Ross]

I got one, they are superb.

[@nizamali4378]

Amarok...all the way, got mine and loving it, that transmission is so smooth...and the POWER

[@carba8606]

And the cost....when things go wrong

[@johnboy5167]

@@carba8606 same as the others

[@duncanwood4489]

580 Highline in order for delivery mid next year. All the active safety stuff is more of a hindrance than a help, can’t stand lane keep assist. Rear air bags are a shortcoming, but it does flawlessly, what is important and that is drive, handling, performance and transmission. Amazing this is a 10 year old platform and yet feels newer than everything else in the segment! Can’t argue with German engineering

[@martinwolmarans1833]

@Duncan. Couldn't aggree m ore. All this lane keep and blind spot monitpr crap. People can't drive and lazy to turn their heads. Rather have the power and awd on the tarmac and good German engineering in the rough stuff

[@SecretSqurrl]

After extensively test driving both engined Fords, I just purchased the Amarok. Same colour too. The VW was just so much better on the road. Purchased the Ultimate mainly for the comfort of the drivers seat. Disappointing I then need to pay for a tow bar and ‘Ute lid’ that are standard equipment on the Ford. The Amarok is quite basic in the electronic bells and whistles department. Previous vehicle was a Navara STX 550. I found the 4 cyl Ford engine tiresome to drive and the 5 cyl unrefined in comparison to VW’s V6.

[@johnvu5987]

Amarok please Own one and loved it .

[@xabhashedrivingschool2969]

Hi I own a VW amarok v6 3.0tdi extreme, it really awesome it has got power, speed and also a huge space. Between Ranger wildtrak and VW amarok ay khona VW amarok is the best

[@scottintveld8551]

Drove both back to back went with the Amarok, smooth and powerful

[@Johnno1979]

I'd chose the Amaarok..... IF it had a bigger infotainment system and safety features that should be standard now days.

[@Ngmone]

The best video i ever seen about cars. Bravo!

[@peterrupe4005]

Driven both towed with both VW all the way as overall feel safer on the road. Also easier to clean in side.

[@matta9432]

Wish you could get that green for the Amarok in lower spec models can't afford the ultimate. And that green is so nice

[@Aerhgad1]

I have seen it on a core model of a 2014 so I would assume you still can

[@strider88888]

@@Aerhgad1 Peacock Green is exclusive to the Amarok Ultimate

[@Aerhgad1]

@@strider88888 Must have been an almost identical green in the core models around when I bought mine in 2013. The colour was almost exactly the same, it was on a second hand core in the yard.

[@strider88888]

Nanowave Guess you were lucky 😁 It’s s nice colour 👍 I wish I could have got it or the blue of the previous Ultimate in the Highline V6 Mine was a MY17.5 without Ad Blue made in Argentina. All of the other V6s coming out of Germany at the time had Ad Blue. Some Highline V6s had the paddles on the steering wheel - I was told mine would but when I got it - no paddles.... Dealer did nothing ...

[@Aerhgad1]

@@strider88888 Pitty about the paddles, I would love them in mine. You probably got lucky with the no ad blue in your even though its Argentina made, I've heard it's a pain in the arse. Mine is made in Argentina too, quality is still there, its nearly 6 years old with zero issues, I've only ever needed to replace one indicator bulb haha

[@warhamsterful]

Amarok, I pick mine up next week, test drove both of them, I'm not a family man, I'm not to fussed about the rear air bags, Amarok drives better and goes harder. IMHO of course :D

[@liammclean7532]

You do know that it struggles off road, they tested the amarok on the grand tour and it couldn’t get up a muddy hill

[@warhamsterful]

​@@liammclean7532 *shrug* Had mine for a month now, had no issue with muddy hills. I prefer to live in the real world than believe what I see on a show the likes of grand tour. :D

[@liammclean7532]

warhamsterful how would you suggest they faked it, CGI? . It’s a fact that actual 4x4 with locking diff is better of road than AWD. And if you aren’t going off road you shouldn’t really have one anyway

[@warhamsterful]

@@liammclean7532 that's way to many assumptions for me to bother replying to. I have no issues with mine. It handles what I use it for better than or equally to my friends ranger. Buy what you want but fuck off with your bullshit attitude.

[@dirkvandermerwe8444]

@@liammclean7532 that was a bullshit test.

[@andileblessingshange3505]

Amarok for me is the best. However, vw need to give it an interior and safety update

[@Mctab]

I am all over the ranger, yeah it may not be as powerful but it is more efficient and has loads of standard safety equipment.

[@waelchakhto4888]

I have both of them since 2017 And until now I can’t decide which one is the best

[@sap3055]

It's the same for me asvel the amarok is a more posh car but the ranger is the off road master

[@johannesamatdarso6200]

good review

[@dperk1757]

They are both fantastic vehicles, but for me the Amarok has the edge. The Amarok V6 is more comfortable on and off road, more powerful, has better throttle control off road, larger tray with less wheel arch intrusion into usable space, and by far the better wearing of the two vehicles. Yes, Amarok needs rear airbags, but you also have to consider why the Amarok without rear airbags still has a five start ANCAP rating? There’s good reason for this as airbags are only one part of the safety story. The Ranger would definitely be my second choice though - Amarok 9/10 Ranger 8/10

[@SkiRacingOz]

The ranger can fit a way bigger tray though with its longer wheelbase

[@gibbethoskins8621]

Good no bullshit, no wankery review 👍 Hard to go past that extra power and performance on and off road, for that reason gotta be the Amarok, guessing that was your actual opinion too, but just didn't want to trigger the Ranger army. One huge flaw the Amarok has in not having low range is the reverse is geared to high and makes it virtually impossible to reverse a heavy trailer, boat or caravan up hill, speaking from experience.

[@marinerchris]

You Should have get the 4x4 wildtrak for the viewers, just to get it more comparison vs Amarok's AWD.

[@neckstumping]

Ummmm he did have the 4x4 Wildtrak....... Not sure where you can buy a 2wd wildtrak in Australia.... or the world for that matter.

[@sivuyilenelsonntongolo4327]

I have test-driven both: I chose the Amarok. Very smooth to drive like an SUV than a bakkie. Very comfortable to drive.

[@accentgroup4106]

EXACTLY

[@charli73749]

I prefer the Amarok because it have more cabin space. I drove the new Ranger and was disappointed on how uncomfortable their seats are.

[@lukeatherton5814]

Well my wife and I were totally torn so we got one of each lol. I have the Amarok ironically went for the same colour Amarok green. My wife got a black Ranger! We are sorted for all conditions 😂

[@td3039]

So what’s your verdict?

[@muzzy35o]

Well where do I start, I previously owned the 2 litre Amarok with a six speed manual transmission, on the road and off it I thought at the time was the best car I have ever owned (had fords, Mitsubishi tritons and Padjero), that was until I drove the latest VW Amarok, NOW I DO DRIVE THE BEST SUV ever made, by day it could be forgotten that I am driving an SUV, and once off road it does what others do very well. Love my Roc.

[@marinusscholtz9342]

It's not an SUV.

[@neilharvey9898]

We have both these trucks as company vehicles and at the end of the day everyone wants the Amarok’s

[@fridrikhermannfridriksson5501]

Good review. If the Amarok would only have had a low range I would not have hesitated for a minute.

[@fridrikhermannfridriksson5501]

@John Winzil I have tried one and it does without a question need a low range. Liked it a lot apart from the lack of a low range.

[@fridrikhermannfridriksson5501]

@John Winzil I agree that it is in many ways a very nice truck and like you say practical and efficient in many or most cases. However, the lack of a low range was unacceptable and a no go for me. In my opinion, low range capability, both forward and rearward, without overheating and/or damaging something is absolutely mandatory when it comes to trucks in that category. As much as I liked the truck, the all-wheel drive system and not to mention that V6, I was equally surprised how in the world VW could miss out on that very important factor for many buyers.

[@roymilford4386]

I choose the Amarok as its more outstanding than the Ranger. Comfort ride, spacious, faster, better MPG among other things. Just the extra safety the Ranger and the price and if you getting a vehicle like the Amarok then nothing wrong in spending a few more bucks.

[@stiaandenysschen1724]

only two wheel drive on asphalt...... bitumen is a liquid, but a very lovely review

[@langamaope3019]

Just grab the V6 from the Amarok and put it in the Ranger and you have the pickup we all want

[@stainMK2]

Thats actually not a bad idea..

[@hans-joachimripke506]

That´s it! But with the sorry excuse of a motor in it the Ranger it´s only good for driving to the junkyard. Besides -I own a Ranger now , but with a 3.2l. And the way, it´s put together in SA it´s far from reliable, most of the first 30000 km it was going to the Dealer and back. Never again!

[@vimak8875]

@@hans-joachimripke506 really, so between Hilux 2.8 and Bi-turbo which one would you prefer?

[@hans-joachimripke506]

@@vimak8875 always the Hilft, unfortunately the 2.8l isn't available in Germany, otherwise that would be the ride of my choice.

[@jacobaf9185]

Well Ford and and VW are way ahead if you. The next Ranger and Amarok models due in 2021/22 is an Aussie designed Ranger with a VW V6

[@waynewatkins4136]

Good review for someone who sits on the fence

[@neytiri490]

Hi, for me the Ranger is the one i would pick. Why? -Cause i would buy a pickup truck just because i like the style of such a vehicle. I don't care much of the max speed or the acceleration, it's a truck an not a race car. -In general I like the equipment (interior, functions, safety) of the Ranger more than the Amaroks' -The Ranger is cheaper then the Amarok and here in Germany you pay less taxes if you have a smaller engine -And the strongest argument for me, you can get a manual transmission in the Ranger and i would never buy an automatic transmission because it's so boring to drive:)

[@johnboy5167]

The ranger is horrible to drive and is not safer the amarock v6 is way better 😄

[@bearlemley]

We have a wide track and an Everest. Both have the bi-turbo. There is a noticeable difference in range and fuel economy. The fuel time four wheel drive Everest being the worst. Both have been dependable.

[@handendaer]

Wow what an amazing review m8888 🐵👍🏿👍🏿👍🏿

[@paulm5817]

amarok all day BUT It desperately needs an interior upgrade, more safety and tech and its by far to best rig if they do that going forward

[@roymilford4386]

That's what VW needs to work on next.

[@nigecunningham9768]

Own a V6 ROK 165kw and love it. Test drove the lot before purchase and nothing else compared to the ride quality and power. Yes they sell more wRanger's but that's because everybody can't afford an Amarok.......doesn't mean it's worse. Love the AWD for added traction. Have another ute which is part time 4WD.......at traffic lights after its rained, on an incline, go to take off and all you do is spin the rear wheels.........completely unnerving. Those who say.........there's no low range........phfft!! I've crossed the Simpson Desert in my ROK on 19" wheels and it smashed it. Amarok everyday.

[@clashakansson1380]

Ranger!!

[@martinwolmarans1833]

Quite interesting how Rangers have to have have many new models in last 10 years to stay some form of relevant. Amarok does a couple of tweaks and still in the game and top if you ask me. Rather have awesome power, excellent gearbox ,awd and good German engineering.

[@SkiRacingOz]

Ranger has only had small updates like the looks, screen and instrument cluster, the actual ute is still exactly the same

[@peterpetrus2032]

I prefer the wildtrak

[@boyetpersonal]

Just bring that amarok here in the philippines, i like speed and good acceleration...

[@tmc3834]

Value for the money - Ranger. Premium price minus the basic safety stuff - Amarok. Suit the vehicle to the driver and thier needs.

[@pred8512]

Did try both and hilux as well bought Amarok...Amarok every time! Did same in 2013 did try all three,no comprison Rok did drive better and still does!

[@Abu7929]

Well I'v got a Hilux, mate's got an Amarok.... Mine tows better, goes further off road... his is a fraction faster, but doesn't even have a gps or proximity entry wtf

[@pred8512]

Abu7929 Something very wrong there either with your mate or his Amarok

[@Abu7929]

@@pred8512 he can make the windows wind down remotely, for some bizarre reason, so points for that

[@pred8512]

Abu7929 😂😂😂👍🏻

[@christinemackay2096]

I own a Ranger and engine has blown up at 130,000kms - not durable in my opinion.

[@0ysteinlarsen1]

Tried them both and bought an Amarok:)

[@stainMK2]

Me too

[@geodezija8888]

Me too

[@paulsouth4794]

I'D like to see a 'work mate ' VW . V6 16'' wheels .. duel speed transfer case . Propper hard points . And propper ground clearance. And possibly a live axel front end . I'd buy that

[@phantomwalker8251]

4.2tdi,f250.2002,does it all.

[@markworth4496]

Ford Ranger anyday

[@namuswecarol9226]

Thanx man ,I choose the Volkswagen amarok

[@shaunsnyman5107]

Ranger all the way

[@davidanderson8381]

No rear airbags. That ruled it out for my family. A pity as everything else about the VW was good.

[@Aussie3333]

No rear airbags for the ranger either ?

[@pierreronach9449]

Great review but you make it clear that you like Amarok more.

[@nev357]

I owned a 2016 Wildtrak and just updated to the 2019 Wildtrak. I mainly drive long distance mountain alpine roads and I can't speak high enough of the Ranger Wildtrak. The 2lt is more agile, faster than the 2016. Down under VW is expensive to buy and service and not enough VW service centres for me to even consider one, plus resale Ranger will on sell within a day, where as VW will sit around for ages.

[@phantomwalker8251]

should of kept the 3.2...bigger engine,less stress.i wont buy anything under 4.2..tech is great,till it stops..i wont sell my 2002 f250 4.2tdi.gets 13lt 100..700nm,170kw..no tech..145lt tank.work it out...& runs 35" tyres.nothing else....low range is to kill for,,maybe better than the old f100 granny..i also have among others,a 1962 f100 divorced transfer case f100,4x4.352FE..no rust,still drives,no probs..

[@nev357]

@@phantomwalker8251 Your American version of the Fird Ranger is totally different from the Ranger we get. Our version is far more refined from what I have observed. We have very little need for F250 here in New Zealand and I replace my vehicle every 3 years so I don't need a fuel guzzling fat dinosaur. I am currently on a 3,000km road trip and the Ranger is perfect for my needs, absolute pleasure and it's running at 8.1litres per 100km.

[@aulord80]

Milk comes in 2ltrs

[@nev357]

@@aulord80 I am lactose intolerant and you obviously haven't driven the biturbo 2lt deisel powered Ranger. It is far better in all aspects compared to any other Ranger power plants by a long way. The tech is impressive...But you keep drinking your milk, it suits you.

[@percyrudman3438]

@aulord80 coke also comes in 2ltrs. And that is what everyone said about the Amarok. I have driven the 2.0ltr BiTurbo and the 3.2 Rangers and by far the BiT is better and more stable.

[@johnjrambo5827]

VW all the way 💪

[@johnbramich]

2019 Ranger doesn’t have blind spot monitoring in Australia.

[@Johnno1979]

Blind spot, cross traffic, autonomous braking, adaptive cruise should be standard on all cars nowadays.

[@gerrydays2340]

We have a 2015 ranger good pickup

[@catchawakeup6411]

Don’t get all emotional! Go and test drive both, and then decide witch one is best for you? In addition, if you are brand loyal, then why are you watching this video?

[@davidgullotta7976]

Deff the vw, how can you compare gold with silver. Yes the ranger has more features and is more up to date though its ford build quality that lets it down. 3 years later all the ranger enthusiasts will be like should have bought the vw. It drives better it holds its value better and its a more solid built ute. Not saying the ranger is bad you just have to way up all options what is cheaper in the long run, maintenance, ease of use, comfort and re sale this all pegs the amarok in front. I think both are great test drove both. Walked out with a amarok based on the above

[@jocalibusohump]

Nice

[@HugoMathee]

I'm in South Africa where the Ranger isn't equipped with those safety features either. So Amarok takes the win for me.

[@quintinjordaan5973]

It isn't yet, there is a facelift on the way. Which will have all the standard safety tech. It had already been released in Aus and will arrive here in the second quarter.

[@irvinelehloo6628]

@@quintinjordaan5973 Actually, New Ranger has just been launched in South Africa. And previous Ranger Wildtrak sold in South Africa did have all the active safety features mentioned in the video...

[@quintinjordaan5973]

@@irvinelehloo6628 It didn't have all the safety tech. It had ACC but it never had the auto emergency braking. Had a system that could detect it and flash LEDs on the HUD and precharge the brakes. It did and still does have the lane keeping assist.

[@rickyv2844]

It's here now 15/ 04/ 19

[@johncoetzer9567]

I like the Amarok more as a UTE but the lack of safety will lead me to buy the Ranger.

[@richardbanks3922]

Amarok hands down for me. It’s seems the the Vw is a mans car and the ranger is more a boy toy with all the safety and extras, where as the Amarok is just a drivers Ute.. This is my opinion though, everyone is entitled to theirs as well, theirs no right or wrong, just differences of opinions..

[@DJTrumpMAGA]

So basically you are saying your choice of ute separates you as a man from the boys? Lol. Real man don’t buy Amarok, they buy Hilux.

[@johnboy5167]

Richard is correct Toyota is crap definitely a little boys vehicle 😄

[@davidasbury2265]

Driven both, but the VW wins hands down for me.

[@anitkumar3270]

i like watching reviews like this, but one think i would prefer to see is if reviewers would also take into account the deprecation, resales and cost of maintenance/ parts. if you take those things into consideration the outcome is clear

[@ln5747]

VW?

[@harryens1778]

Amarok any day!

[@fourpipes]

Amarok. Just decided I’m buying one!

[@Owl566]

How’s the amarok go on dry beach sand??

[@duytienpham9190]

payload and towing?

[@carba8606]

Ranger by far

[@nomandland]

Ranger Hands down!!

[@catchawakeup6411]

What if both of them had the same amount of power, cylinders and same price tag? Witch one will you choose?

[@martinwolmarans1833]

Would still be the Amarok. All day everyday. Wont pay that amount if money for a Ford.

[@johnboy5167]

Amarock v6

[@pietervanwyngaard8804]

Ranger please

[@Col_gr33n]

Ranger any time

[@manghezijordanlubisi117]

ford ranger is my favourite truck

[@sheyajoseph9679]

make videos of amarok 4motion and a upgrade ford ranger 2.2 6speed

[@itetilashapaka8032]

Wildtrak all day everyday. Value for money

[@greyhamlogan2255]

He wasn't talking about value, I drive new Utes everyday for work and the Amarok hands down is an incredible beast.

[@yesfratbknowin1631]

whilst they r both great rigs ,value for money u gotta b fkn kidding 65-70 odd grand fuck me better come with blow job attachment had a wildtrak till recently boom at 117k no mods just mags the ranger styling inside and out is killer but would I buy another as much I as I loved it don't know just too many issues everyone knows it but few will admit it

[@randomideas7799]

Ranger, because it gets the work done , is cheaper and looks nice! That's all I want out of a Ute!😋

[@tinotendamandizvidza1903]

The ranger is more expensive

[@frenkybigone5641]

Ford Ranger !!!!!

[@redroo12]

No low range ............nuff said. I'd love to see it pull a boat off the barge at the islands.

[@leevardy25]

The Amarok will pull the boat better than the Ranger all day.

[@harryens1778]

I see hundreds of amarok going on sand pulling everything, boats, caravans... and I never saw one struggling

[@4WDG]

Ford always throws in a ton of extras to make the package more appealing. They have to. VW have a solid brand and they know it. People that own VW know why they drive them. German technology is superior. They don’t need to add tons of extras to make their products appealing. Ford finishing and build quality is still years behind VW. I tested both VW and Ford and my wife owns a ford. VW all day.

[@iva00005]

Literally everyone I know with a vw amarok has had transmission issues.

[@catchawakeup6411]

What if both of them had the same amount of power, cylinders, gears and same price tag? Witch one will you choose?

[@xaerusblade7854]

that is why is it a different vehicle.. i could say to you what if both of them have active safety, same interior, same exterior, same engine? what is the point of comparing then?

[@samsonwamalwa]

Amarok all day any day

[@jonnycars]

Amarok for me, almost bought a wildtrak but was put off by the amount of really serious issues people were having then had an Amarok on hire for a month or two and that made my mind up, absolutely amazing motor, especially if you are doing big mileages! One of the comfiest vehicles I’ve traveled in.

[@user-hl9ln7mq5m]

ONLY FORD RANGER.AMAROK IS JUST A VW ESPECIALLY INSIDE, FORD HAS HISTORY IN TRUCKS.

[@asieribarra4635]

scania and man trck are wolkswagen 😏

[@peabrained3144]

This now depends on where or what you intend to use a ute for. Having said that, I have not seen an Amarok in any 'serious' off-road scenery.

[@javic1979]

its physiclly wider so you often run the risk of not fitting between the trees and the wheels dont fit in the tracks left by other 4x4's. thats the biggest thing iv noticed with mine. deep ruts between tight trees risk body damage

[@rossprivate5456]

um ,why didnt you compare the amarok bi turbo 2.0ltr 10 speed auto with the ranger bi-turbo 2.0ltr 10 speed auto ????

[@greyhamlogan2255]

Because he's got a Ranger stuck up his arse, I drive new Utes everyday for work and all types and the V6 Amarok is now by far the best on New Zealands market-- People just like to say its a Ford, just like some people would rather say its an iPhone.

[@fishingextremetasmania7886]

Graham Lockett true

[@charlieleuluai2267]

Hands down Amarok

[@adrianpursell]

I purchased the wildtrack after driving both, on long dirt roads the ranger rides way better.. plus I love two wheel drive coz sideways action is living!! I just wish the V6 was in the wildtrack!!

[@aulord80]

Easy to please

[@demk.818]

Volkswagen Amarok all with wider rear track than front track bodyworks : 0.7g the lowest traction, extreme tail flick, extreme slide, 20-100 l/100km, over 100 l/100km with F1 speed 160 km/hour to top speed, all speed on all circuits. From Volkswagen databases all End report.

[@lukecaswell3677]

Dem K. Nah bro ford all day

[@140g270wsm]

Ranger is my pick. Better price point and you did not talk about fuel economy, kind of relevant now and Ranger wins that.

[@juliushafsteinsson8358]

Hi, for me the Ranger is the one i would pick.