Merch Store! www.foundandex... NEW CHANNEL: • Launched from the bigg... Discord: / discord My News Channel: / @aviationstationyt Join this channel to get access to perks: / @foundandexplained Patreon: / foundandexplained
Пікірлер: 138
@thefirebirdflock34405 ай бұрын
Glad to know my presumptions of: “oh god, this would make everyone incredibly skeptical of every. Single. 747 in the air.” As soon as I heard about the amount of cruise missiles this thing could carry. was actually addressed.
@Karl_Kampfwagen2 ай бұрын
That's pretty much the reason why it's a backburner project, saved for when SHTF already. Otherwise, all regular planes would be targets
@davejones7475Ай бұрын
Good on you buddy.! That's very well said!
@rorbot_SMF16 күн бұрын
One plane with 100 missiles would be some Ace Combat type stuff 😅😂
@micodyerski16215 ай бұрын
Armed UPS. I saw drawings of a 'secret' 747 cargo hauler and missle launcher. The shipping co. had no clue when a specific crate was placed at the back, a crew would pop out n load the plane like a revolver in the Old West. Arming it to fire wherever UPS flys. 😮
@Homoprimatesapiens5 ай бұрын
Its a good decision they reject Boeings offer. America's adversaries could target all B.-747's in times of conflict and turmoil. The reason is that they couldn't identify the cruise missile carrier from the passenger one and they couldn't take the risk.
@satokotsu5 ай бұрын
and that was before the korean air incident
@Darren-vf2qw5 ай бұрын
No. detection does not work like that. Besides, civillian traffic gets grounded or diverted around these regions where there is conflict.
@Homoprimatesapiens5 ай бұрын
@@Darren-vf2qw When there is militias in the picture you cant rely on conventional military protocol. Evil people act evil. End of story.
@caryfrancis74125 ай бұрын
What risk ? One CMCT could take out every major city in Russia by itself.
@Funk085 ай бұрын
some severe issues with the encoding around 35:47 into the video.
@randomguy17695 ай бұрын
Also at 36:00
@sadscaredorca72505 ай бұрын
i was gonna say, i'm not tripping am i?
@lga90465 ай бұрын
love it, really cool
@John-rl9ue5 ай бұрын
Yeah I though it was my internet but then I watched it when my internet was okay several times.
@powerhouse1095 ай бұрын
It couldn't actually be fully... It couldn't actually be fully... kind of... kind of...
@LilMil11235 ай бұрын
Your editing skills are getting pretty good, congrats
@diademadiademoni20212 күн бұрын
1:50 basically it was Robotech or transformer for real (?)
@lot21965 ай бұрын
They put a rotary launcher in a 737, and it's now the Navy P8 Posiden. Replaced the P3 Orion anti-submarine aircraft.
@bobbyrayofthefamilysmith245 ай бұрын
737s SUCK absolutely garbage plane
@richardnicklin6544 ай бұрын
True, but it’s a surprisingly small weapons bay (compared with the old Nimrod or even the modern P-1). It’s notable that the P-8 is integrating Harpoon on under wing pylons.
@peteconradjr.8605Ай бұрын
"Imagine if rapid dragon existed." Go on. "Imagine."
@DonPatrono5 ай бұрын
"800 Marines dropship" I am sorry, WHAT?
@smalltown.life.inthe.Rockies5 ай бұрын
1:33:43 call'em an airboat, simple compromise. You see how easy it is and can be in the essence of friendly cooperation as opposed to unfriendly competition 😮
@hrk92092 ай бұрын
35:46 video starts glitching and keeps glitching on and off including the audio for like 20 minutes
@MrGottaQuestion5 ай бұрын
I imagine a molten salt reactor would be ideal for the nuclear tug concept.
@nathan922384 ай бұрын
Fun fact MSRs were _invented_ for nuclear aircraft!! Honestly really cool that the design ‘took off’ even if the integrated plane never did
@Initialcosts5 ай бұрын
The video is lengthy, but I’m glad that you covered the most part.
@Gunni19723 ай бұрын
I love it when they design Planes that have wing spans measured in climate zones, and then have to scrap the program because there is a storm in one. And no one ever adresses all the programs that would be scrapped because there is "So much confidence" in exactly "the one" project that cannot work. I really wanna see how such an airplane design arrives at the engineering tables and only pepelaugh comes of it.😂. Design Madness is one thing. Engineering madness (built stuff) is impressive though.
@GhostTech83863 ай бұрын
Your video is very interesting, I like it
@diademadiademoni20212 күн бұрын
Pure madness collection. Some engineers should have keep captive in madhouses.
@jaytnacks7 ай бұрын
No way this has no views
@JamaldeenOlateju5 ай бұрын
You just wait!
@ianmangham45705 ай бұрын
3.2k views now @@JamaldeenOlateju
@goofypoliticalguy43095 ай бұрын
@@NetFlight_26 it went private when he sent the comment
@kevinnac15 ай бұрын
Holy shit a timetraveller
@genxpilot695 ай бұрын
It has views
@edutaimentcartoys5 ай бұрын
wow, nice illustration
@YouTubeOdyssey4 ай бұрын
Large guided missile carriers make a lot of sense, which is probably why we use tiny fighter jets to drop one or two at a time instead.
@Jasonjones-h2x5 ай бұрын
Slot of these ideas would work.in a fictional novel or even a movie...
@flickingbollocks55425 ай бұрын
Great video
@irrelEvant53525 ай бұрын
I am definitely making the cl1201 and the boeing rc1 in trailmakers
@stangundam015 ай бұрын
what was happening around 36:00?
@ideaalted15545 ай бұрын
As someone that mods games all the time I thought my PC was messing up or KZbin was about to crash lmao.
@irrelEvant53525 ай бұрын
1:30:25 dont forget drag
@Knot_Sean5 ай бұрын
Would we be able to see a video about the P2V neptune or the P4M-1?
@mario_uzumaki4 ай бұрын
it's basically a low flight on the surface of the sea
@PetesGuide5 ай бұрын
Love your stuff but the KC-135 was not based on the 707, and it was developed before the 707. It was based on the prototype for both, the dash 80 (367-80). All three had different fuselage diameters, with the dash 80 and KC-135 being noticeably narrower. An airliner with the fuselage of the KC-135 would only be able to have 2+3 seating configurations, instead of the 707’s 3+3.
@HODDIE-698 күн бұрын
That’s cool bro
@arniefunkel93415 ай бұрын
Boeing can into space.
@arniefunkel93415 ай бұрын
Lol oh wait.
@Aidan-zw3dg5 ай бұрын
If we had thie guy animating a movie we get a good movie
@BLD4264 ай бұрын
Bumped this channel up to ALL notifications.👍
@quangnhat64945 ай бұрын
is any one have the link on 800 marines dropship at 0:10 of the video i can't find it
The 747 would have been the greatest jet of all time if they converted it to a twin engine configuration. We could have retired the B-52.
@ConstContact5 ай бұрын
Including my four-year-old grandson this video is like a cartoon it’s ridiculous. Everything about it is ridiculous.
@jato7655 ай бұрын
Don't think the payload Bay would have been an issue. The sofia telescope never had a problem.
@TheGweilo7015 ай бұрын
Rapid Dragon is picking up where this left off
@cecillanter32074 ай бұрын
the B 36 flew with a working reactor
@anthonyobeta27769 күн бұрын
If air canada is not investing in customer service then what’s the point. They need proper competition in the domestic market as well. And no Westjet just isn’t enough
@kinglouis6974Ай бұрын
That’s what I thought Strat away Every 747 would be a target
@chrisw.5138Ай бұрын
1:06:20 me thinks they should have invested their research into that mountain
@TheLiamster5 ай бұрын
The CMCA should have been built
@hilarybrown22715 ай бұрын
Nuh huh
@rickyrico805 ай бұрын
Well years later with the Max Boeing kinda got their utility of mass destruction ( also F KZbin)
@BurninhellscrootoobАй бұрын
Lol.... U must love my u tube name 😂
@rickyrico80Ай бұрын
@Burninhellscrootoob lol actually I do 🤣👍🏼
@kevinburt443 ай бұрын
I must have heard wrong, a mountain moving at 600 mph at 1.06.22........😂
@kieranwright14015 ай бұрын
Honestly surprised the president still uses one since boenings seem to be falling a part at minute 😅
@rabbirt5 ай бұрын
They *used* to be really solid, like American cars were when we made them with love in Detroit. Now there's no love in it, so it's crap
@nikolaideianov50925 ай бұрын
@@rabbirtnah its the md merger with this one The worst parts of MD suvived and took over boeing
@Azivegu5 ай бұрын
You know how the B-52 was built by Boeing in the 50's and is still flying? Well that is because Boeing used to be a quality company. Then they were infected by McDonald Douglas virus and then only money mattered.
@HappyBeezerStudios3 ай бұрын
@@nikolaideianov5092 One could say that the DC-9 and 737 NG were the last really good thing that came out of that conglomerate.
@missel-skibidi5 ай бұрын
yess
@tonikakueumlixo78175 ай бұрын
Could you make a video about the Brazilian Moya Evtol drone? He has a rather alien appearance, I would say.
@alessioalezilla4285 ай бұрын
He came from the past for seeing if his comment had any views
@Afrocanuk5 ай бұрын
The U.S. should have aircraft carrying submarines by now. Japan had them in W.W.II
@WolfeSaber5 ай бұрын
I'm working on a concept for a new flying aircraft carrier, with it coming out to be about 281 feet in length and a large internal space that'll be about 35 feet wide. And it would have a reduced detection signature.
@mrtom71575 ай бұрын
Can’t seem to find content on Nebular which isn’t available KZbin? Feels like you’re lying to me?
@randyb34683 ай бұрын
"Rhodesian flight!"
@josephharrison56395 ай бұрын
Imagine if the us actually does have all these modified 747s secretly
@akitadakid63264 ай бұрын
I stay close to Whiteman and a B2 flew over me when he got to that part of the video . 😏
@DrGooseDuckman5 ай бұрын
Aren't all of Boeing's planes kind of weapons of mass destruction nowadays LOL?
@forresttm4 ай бұрын
Cmca. Or rapid dragon as its now called.. Why use rotary launchers when a pallets way cheaper😂
@RadityaVarelia5 ай бұрын
Hello
@namepending1555 ай бұрын
Subs have nukes and conventional warheads. Obviously you can launch one or the other in a sub. I wonder for these cargo plane setups have the launch order is set. I am also thinking about the pallet launch system that is currently out there or in development and if they can launch a nuke off a pallet and if that fact could get military cargo plains shot down quicker. Same issue of getting shot down, I do not know what nukes are launchable from a fighter jet. “Sum of All Fears” book had that. 😂 I appreciate any insight that you all have on this stuff.
@micahfoley95723 ай бұрын
i'd say novel breakthroughs in fuel efficiency require a hell of a lot more imagination and creativity than some megacorp deciding to tap tax payers so they can try to build the biggest airplane ever for the 50th time...
@chazmartin8048Ай бұрын
36:22 am i having a stroke?
@johnfields96695 ай бұрын
Taking a jumbo jet an give it the ability to load different types of drones. Fully load with like lets say 100 units with varying attack capabilities. That's a scary flying aircraft carrier especially as like a surprise attack. All of a sudden 3 or 4 cargo planes over a major city an release a swarm of hundreds. Some programmed for certain people or infrastructure with others just causing chaos among the general population.
@cremasca5 ай бұрын
❤❤❤
@johnvcramer55175 ай бұрын
And how would keep the Secret, "Secret" people would TELL and it would not BE SECRET would it.???????????
@mrman56665 ай бұрын
my problem with this video is that the a-10 part he mentions Pierre Sprey who is NOT THE DESIGNER OF THE A-10 it was Alexander Kartveli who made the thunderbolt 2 and p-47 thunderbolt but he sadly die before he saw the first a-10 fly and he had a heart attack and died and Pierre Sprey take credit from it even tho he was never a part of the team nor did he make any plane he was the one that clamed he SHOW THIS PLANE TO A N*IZS who was know for smugling firearms and other you know N*ZIS to hungary. and then we have why the a-10 was built it as a spite project against attack heilcopters and to have a light bomber as the usa had no light bombers nor a good cas plane so thay made the a-10 and it was found to be still useless against any modern armor reamber this is 1972 it was out of date by then it cannon cant do any thing but kill Friendly as any thing in the splash zone/ 2 bus's away you'll be hit by bullets from the a-10 which is made to be able to burn on hiting some thing. (sorry for being a bit rude but it just naging me to tell you this but hay my here to comment)
@daveash95725 ай бұрын
Dude! 1:51:40, the word is "weaponry" not "weapondree".
@wintersbattleofbands1144Ай бұрын
28:55 There's no "r" in Macon. 34:57 52:37 Still can't pronounce armament? That's one thing, but it's inexcusable with proper nouns.
@KevinNguyen-zn4vv5 ай бұрын
747 militarized version would have the same radar signature as the passenger version...Imagine how many passenger aircrafts would be mistaken for a military aircraft be shot down.
@wwiggans5 ай бұрын
My brother Jeff was the crew chief for A=10 207 based at Davis Monthan AFB in Tucson, AZ. He routinely had better mission capable rates then were thought possible by Fairchild-Republic.
@Ansset010 күн бұрын
Oh. Wow. 🥱
@PathfinderxrАй бұрын
The 747 stuff is just ridiculous. I hope we move on to the next subject soon 🙏 😊
@karashevf5 ай бұрын
01K
@SebastianSanchez-md8jh5 ай бұрын
Nahhhhhhhh
@karashevf5 ай бұрын
21047
@evandeaver7384Ай бұрын
more like for a galactic assault...
@SebastianSanchez-md8jh5 ай бұрын
Yuuuuuu
@MissionCrazy-h1j2 ай бұрын
Sb
@gwoody40033 ай бұрын
Why do they train with actual nuclear weapons? 😂 I know, its supposed to underline the seriousness and importance of the training excercises. But like... put a brick in the nose cone and just tell the guys its live maybe? 😂 You aren't supposed pull a gun unless you are actually gonna use it, cus accidents happen. An H bomb is a little more dangerous than a drunk with a .45 Smith and Wesson having an argument at the bar.
@ChanceNowotny-g8d28 күн бұрын
USSR cccp
@coolcatgamer19285 ай бұрын
10th
@RichardMcLaren5 ай бұрын
Oh ffs not this narrator again!
@VQBABY5 ай бұрын
Destruction & Violence Yet the same people make you pacified, vote and act normal. Not this lap.