Look out Ian! Brandon Herrera is right behind you!
@sumvs59923 жыл бұрын
That's why there's a bar over the door behind him, to prevent him from breaking in
@koristargel81373 жыл бұрын
@@sumvs5992 That's his health bar
@MtionLHalo3 жыл бұрын
*you may not sleep now, there are monsters nearby*
@ZacharySkan3 жыл бұрын
Oh no! He's too busy adoring his chauchat!
@KageMinowara3 жыл бұрын
@@ZacharySkan Chauchat-chan is very distracting.
@HS-ck7md3 жыл бұрын
I remember my high school years in the USSR where we used to disassemble and assemble the AK-47.
@lebah85553 жыл бұрын
Cool
@d1psy853 жыл бұрын
We still do that in Kazakhstan, though It's we disassemble an AK74M, not an AKM
@TC-rc1zf3 жыл бұрын
How American.
@spoohater69493 жыл бұрын
Ok that is cool about being able to have guns in school and learning how to disassemble and reassemble a ak Do u still know how to re and disassemble a ak47
@d1psy853 жыл бұрын
@@spoohater6949 Well, I finished school just a year ago, but I still remember how to disassembe it, though I always had trouble assembling it.
@rizaradri3166 жыл бұрын
Here in Indonesia our special forces have a slang for the selector switch on the AK for full auto they called it "Ok Banget"(OB) that mean great and for semi auto they called it "Ora Akeh"(OA) that mean decent
@rizaradri3166 жыл бұрын
TheRealColBosch cool
@nicolasvillamil75236 жыл бұрын
TheRealColBosch For me it's Fun(semi), More fun(auto), and No fun(safety)
@benhardsatrio82225 жыл бұрын
Slight revision: AB/ automatic is Akeh Banget, which in Javanese slang means "very many", and OA/ single-shot is Ora Akeh, which means "not many".
@Fred_the_19965 жыл бұрын
*and when you replace the propellant in the rounds with explosives it’s even more fun!*
@MiekuahProductions5 жыл бұрын
@@benhardsatrio8222 and it must be based on the select file label in russian cyliric
@colsoncustoms89946 жыл бұрын
Holy shit, just saw that Amazon Prime has 2 movies with Ian in them. "Heavy Machine Guns" and "Big-Ass Guns". Be watching both tomorrow.
@mikepeterson97336 жыл бұрын
Prime has at least 10 - yes, ten - of Ian's docus.
@colsoncustoms89946 жыл бұрын
That's freaking awesome, I'll have to look for the others. Thanks
@commiecrusher3 жыл бұрын
It appears they are all gone now.
@ProphTruth1003 жыл бұрын
@@commiecrusher I saw at least one the other day I think
@tamlandipper292 жыл бұрын
There are quite a few now, although rather expensive, considering the digital format. Published by Gold Harbour media, so not a choice by Ian, presumably.
@b_rrys6 жыл бұрын
Totally took one of my AKs out of the safe to look at it while you talked about this type one.
@badassmastermax4 жыл бұрын
might as well throw in a mosin nagant and a hipoint and call it a rare collection
@bombsawaylemay7703 жыл бұрын
Pretty fascinating comparing the AKM receiver to the Type 1.
@Stale_Mahoney3 жыл бұрын
"look its your grandpa"
@baileyosborn87243 жыл бұрын
Were ya sad when you knew you didn’t have a type 1
@TheMongooseOfDoom5 жыл бұрын
5:20 We will set this [magazine] aside. *thump*
@clapper35305 жыл бұрын
a review of the PP-19 Bizon would be nice :D
@robertlamberth65864 жыл бұрын
@Djamel Djamel If Larry Vickers can get access to Russia's Kalashnikov factory, i'm sure Ian could pull some strings and find a PP-19 to review
@Oob1444 жыл бұрын
Good luck finding a real one
@shooteveryday18414 жыл бұрын
And a PP2000
@bradenculver74573 жыл бұрын
I think Ian would think the same if he could get a hold of one
@Tunkkis3 жыл бұрын
Not so much a review as a historical and mechanical overview.
@YCCCm76 жыл бұрын
Love that Ian's redoing these for maximum accuracy of information. This is the stuff FW is all about!
@5KM5K5 жыл бұрын
This brings back so much memories from the finnish army disassembling and cleaning my valmet rk62. It was a great rifle, accurate enough and not once did it jam or misfire whilst I had it. Super reliable.
@codenamecordon5 жыл бұрын
Same thoughts exactly from over the “pond” with a Galil that is based on your RK62 😃
@Kydenius5 жыл бұрын
Same type of memories, except with the SAKO RK95-TP in my honest opinion; it's way superior update of the weapon in everyway, it's even easier to clean with the barrel. For example you can clean the barrel from the inside the mechanism, unlike in the RK62, that isn't simply possible. But I knew many other people who prefer the RK62, it's just not for me unless my life is dependent on it, I'd choose the 95' anyday.
@jefftraboulsy86315 жыл бұрын
@@codenamecordon Galil is god gun. It's simply an incredible firearm.
@drdnout4 жыл бұрын
@@codenamecordon which is based on AK.
@jarmokankaanpaa65284 жыл бұрын
If my rk62 had been as messy inside as Ian's, I would have had to do a few orbits around the mess hall before cleaning it again and presenting for renewed inspection. And he didn't even show what the end of the piston looked like -- that was a favorite inspection point. Interestingly enough, we were NOT allowed to clean the insides with paper since that would have taken the grease off.
@joshhill59326 жыл бұрын
Kalashnikov said one of the big problems with the first stamped ak's was the heat treating and tempering of the receivers.
@markreeter62274 жыл бұрын
The most iconic combat weapon of the second half of the last century.
@LilPistachiofr2 жыл бұрын
@@LIONTAMER3D wrong
@DeathToFrankLung4 жыл бұрын
Ian, you never cease to amaze me how dedicated you are to providing the actual FACTUAL information about these awesome firearms, most don’t put that kind of effort into it like you do and it shows, much respect brother!
@draxxsklounst65956 жыл бұрын
I love the smell of ak in the morning
@therugburnz5 жыл бұрын
Afternoon, dusk and night on most days to I'm guessing?
@thesturm86865 жыл бұрын
Type 1 for morning, type 2 for noon, and type 3 before bed
@cs-rj8ru4 жыл бұрын
@@bmstylee Smells like greasy steel and plywood.
@yogibro64424 жыл бұрын
I miss the smell of chinese import ammo from the 90s
@floo14653 жыл бұрын
@@bmstylee smells like a mixture of carbon and steel, especially the gas piston
@JimParshall6 жыл бұрын
Another awesome video. You mentioned historians disagreeing with a theory. I would LOVE to see a video about the different theories and the cases for them. I have learned so much from your channel it was literally a no-brainer to patreon you. Thanks again for all your hard (and probably fun) work. :) You really do provide a great service to the community.
@mantasbabenskas27613 жыл бұрын
There are historians and there are some Russian historians, who are trying to diminish the fact that Hugo Schmeisser along with other captured Germans was miles ahead of Soviet firearm designers. Not to mention Michail Kalashnikov himself, who actually was poorly educated peasant, who first saw steam locomotive at the age of 18 and is said to have created one of the best automatic rifles in history after simply reading a book on firearms at the military hospital. That's the long story short version
@wurzel96712 жыл бұрын
@@mantasbabenskas2761 stg 44 and ak 47 look completely different internally
@mantasbabenskas27612 жыл бұрын
@@wurzel9671 - so you're trying to say all weapon designs, produced by same designer, must always look the same internally? Also - why that kalashnikov guy never made any new weapons after AK-47? Except all those the derivatives from its original design. How strong are the chances that it's because the Germans left after making an AK? Or should I say HS-47
@wurzel96712 жыл бұрын
@@mantasbabenskas2761 I was referencing the claim often made that "the AK and the STG are almost the same internally", since that is something a lot of people still believe. Also, Kalaschnikov *did* invent other weapons.
@Don_Valentino6 жыл бұрын
who is binge watching all the re-up?
@samuelbean99286 жыл бұрын
not really sure what Ian is "updating",but when you're like me and have selective A.D.D.thats O.K.because I forget more shit than I retain!
@randywatson83476 жыл бұрын
Update inaccurate sins 😊
@emperortobefearedblackmili51305 жыл бұрын
Meeeee
@KA-vs7nl4 жыл бұрын
Is he updating inaccurate information?
@ZaMonolith19863 жыл бұрын
Just watched Kalashnikov movie and now I have to rewatch these
@TarmanTheChampion5 жыл бұрын
The patina and bluing on this rifle is spectacular!
@naz95k714 жыл бұрын
brandon harrera would cream himself if he ever even held this rifle lmao
@Graceinator3 жыл бұрын
Today is the day
@vit101010105 жыл бұрын
I served in the Soviet army, if my sergeant saw such dirt in weapons, I would be very severely punished!
@snipersl2705 жыл бұрын
When your a civilian you can get away with cleaning your guns only when they need it. =P
@vaclavjebavy51185 жыл бұрын
When did you serve?
@filmcameras4evr455 жыл бұрын
Fascinating! What unit were you in and where were you based?
@totallyaploy18244 жыл бұрын
When/where?
@KIT2142LAW4 жыл бұрын
@Patrick Rapan Considering soviet/russian army had/has mandatory conscription for every male over the age of 18- unlikely
@codenamecordon5 жыл бұрын
Really cool to see an AK47 taken apart! We had Galils during my service and they are sort of a grandson of the AK47. The Galil (5.56) is based on the Finnish RK62, which is based on andused the same ammo as an AK47. They are really similar inside, but as far as taking apart goes, you can remove the gas tube and forward grip without any tools as well. Galils were also really reliable, blanks sometimes caused an issue but mainly due to the blanks compensator. Can’t remember a malfunction with live ammo that wasn’t because of a damaged casing or user error 😃
@zappafranklin405 жыл бұрын
codenamecordon I thought the Galilis was based on the FAL?
@strahinjastevic74803 жыл бұрын
@@zappafranklin40 far from it
@Playbound Жыл бұрын
@@zappafranklin40what?😂
@barrageballoon48456 жыл бұрын
4 video updates, this must be an early birthday present. Thanks "Gun Gandalf"
@eduardomunoz72075 жыл бұрын
Its gun Jesus
@maximilianfranz21586 жыл бұрын
i never realised how beautyful these are...
@lukehuang78215 жыл бұрын
*blyatiful :)
@therugburnz5 жыл бұрын
I love how they did the skeleton for the pistol grip. Building to a price point, seems like how most modern manufacturers do now, curious.
@murphy78013 жыл бұрын
You don't waste materials in USSR otherwise USSR wastes you.
@dylantherandomperson.39035 жыл бұрын
Your channel is very serious, fascinating, and great content,keep it up!
@w.o.v.10336 жыл бұрын
Appreciate these type of history lessons , “ It needs to be told &taught “!!! Not forgotten nor faded away👍
@leifvejby80236 жыл бұрын
Must be the best Sunday ever, four forgotten weapons videos and a Silverstone GP in less than three hours!!!
@Justanotherconsumer6 жыл бұрын
In Soviet Russia AK disassembles you.
@7.62eclipse85 жыл бұрын
Best rendition of this joke i have ever seen😂 well done sir.
@thecyka81915 жыл бұрын
Just imagine that 😫
@thecyka81915 жыл бұрын
@randomserb 0 lol
@lukehuang78215 жыл бұрын
Literally.
@starstencahl89855 жыл бұрын
I mean its purpose is kind of disassembling the enemy, soo.. 😂
@BartJBols6 жыл бұрын
6:52 thats not a suffix, probably not worth to address but i thought id mention the difference. In numbering, prefixes come BEFORE the numbering, suffixes AFTER. So neither is actually part of the incrementing number itself. Suffixes and prefixes are used to give categories, for example WA00123 for Washington, number 123, the number increments, the suffix or prefix does not or does separately from the actual number, for example if there was a production run of 1000 guns, then another run of 1000 we could have AA1000 be followed by AB0001 So, it can be either part of the numbering, and not be a suffix or a prefix, or its a prefix giving some kind of category. EDIT: after further reading, if these AK's are numbered in Kurdish with cyrillic alphabet (they aren't afaik) then you could call this a suffix, since the reading direction of the serial number would be inverted.
@WHO91196 жыл бұрын
Man my ocd went overboard when I saw how dirty the AK was
@Seabass12065 жыл бұрын
it’s held together with rivets, it would be so difficult to clean it enough
@madworldsnight55285 жыл бұрын
This is why milled receiver Sks is my all time favourite.
@murphy78013 жыл бұрын
It's fine
@shawnoandrew2 жыл бұрын
Would've love to have got hold of a kit back when they were reasonably priced. I did build a nice Type III.
@fpsfug5 жыл бұрын
Awesome video, thank you once again Ian! The center support is directly behind the magazine well and almost contacts the "spine" of most conventional ak magazines in later pattern rifles when they are seated.
@stevederp98019 ай бұрын
I wrote a paper in college on the AK-47 and the Soviet arms industry. The very real world view at this point for the soviets was that they would flood the colonial world with these weapons to bring communist revolutions. It’s why they are built so rugged and why they’re designed to be mass produced beyond what even the Soviet Union would need. This strategy was driven mostly by political and social factors. What they ignored were the military and economic realities. First they were basically giving away these weapons instead of trading them for resources. While they did get some return it was a very one sided trade that often did not pay off. The second issue was devoting so much attention and resources to producing weapons prevented their economy from actually meeting the needs of their own people. The desire to turn the rest of the world communist meant that they spend at one point nearly 25% of their GDP towards arms production and a massive portion of this was for export. The planned economy put more emphasis on exporting weapons than producing cars and other good for their own population. The AK seems to almost be an analogy on this. A rugged and well built machine built to fight a war that never happened. At the peak the Soviet Union produced 100 million of these, yet the average citizen didn’t own a car.
@OlegOfTheDead6 жыл бұрын
Живу в Ижевске и не знал об этих ранних моделях, надо же. Спасибо, Йен! Видео понравилось, я на самом деле увидел нечто, чего не видел :) I live in Izhevsk and I didn't knew about this early models! Thanks a lot, Ian!
@Govrin.5 жыл бұрын
Translate
@mihan2d5 жыл бұрын
@@Govrin. He has the thanslated text under the Russian text, can you even read?
@worldoftancraft5 жыл бұрын
Всё же, кажется, правильнее Иан)
@woofkaf77245 жыл бұрын
там же музей должен быть, сходи
@Mrfailstandstil5 жыл бұрын
worldoftancraft Иэн
@vahannema6 жыл бұрын
it would appear you misspoke at 8:10, "6 o'clock and 9 o'clock" instead of 3 and 9, but it's clear it's a very minor mistake and what was actually ment. Keep up the awesome videos!
@nothingtoitdm61914 жыл бұрын
I read years ago in a comblock magazine that heat treatment of the stampings was an issue with the original stamped ak and premature failure was an issue
@benkeane3655 жыл бұрын
I love ak type rifles. My favourite is a genuine classic ak47, followed by an akm with dark black metal and a light shade of wood with a waffle mag.
@ДмитрийИванов-х1ы3д3 жыл бұрын
My fav rifle is the SVD equipped with a 20rnd magazine and an OKP-7 sight.
@WARXion6 жыл бұрын
I hope there will be another errors to fix cause I will watch this as many times as you upload it. So beautiful.
@AndRew-vo9bz3 жыл бұрын
I love the noise the guns make when they are assembled and dissembled
@jamesdewer4 жыл бұрын
Your best most seamless video yet. What an incredible background on this arm. Great!
@alejoquiroga93694 жыл бұрын
7:00 "Г" es la letra "G", por "года/goda".
@bryceforsyth85214 жыл бұрын
"Г" como en "голъ". Perdóne, mi español es muy malo.
@adanzavala48014 жыл бұрын
@@bryceforsyth8521 It's ok, i am a native speaker, and that "perdone" is a formal way of reffering to an older person or someone who is on top of you in a pyramid, so it's ok.
@JohnDoe-pv2iu3 жыл бұрын
I may be mistaken but the front of the trigger guard, where the magazine catch is, also looks taller. I know the AKM has a flat piece of steel sandwiched in there. Great video! I've never seen a type one AK in person. Thanks Ian, John
@avanboy54264 жыл бұрын
on the original Ak-47 it was a stamped metal dust cover that was a full millimeter thick and was smooth but that added weight to the gun and was harder to produce so then on the Akm the dust cover is half a millimeter thick and has rivets on top of the dust cover to keep it's strength and that also made it more easy to make and was cheaper but also on the Ak-47 on the gas tube there was little holes drilled into the gas pistons tube but on the Akm theres no holes in the gas tube at the end at the gas port is where the holes were all drilled
@igorgussev13606 жыл бұрын
Great video so far, just want to add some corrections. #1 Type 1/2/3 are incorrect names for the models. These AK's were called at Izhevsk with № and comment. Something like AK №1 stamped, AK №2 with lightened barrel box. AK №3 with a folding stock etc. #2 How Schmeisser could have helped with the stamping process if 1. He was a designer, not a technology process engineer. 2. Haenel company for which he worked did not produce stamped parts 3. Stamped parts were made at Merz-Werke company and later assembly process was performed at the Haenel, ERMA, Sauer&Sohn and Steyr 4. If he didn't have an education as the engineer-technologist and his company didn't have experience in stamping how could he have helped at Izhevsk 5. Strictly speaking, stamping technology required for Stg-44 is quite different than one for an AK because of the locking mechanism and different energy of the cartridge (plus its different, German way of making stuff). I would understand if you would have compared Sudaev's AS-44(АС-44) and Stg-44 stamping technologies somewhat because both of these were made out of thin steel sheets. These are comparable 6. 7.62x41 (initially) and 7.62x39 are new cartridges at a time and quite different from US 7.62x33 and German 7.92x33 cartriges, so how Germans could have helped with manufacturing process of the type of gun which used unknown cartridge for them with unknown energy parameters. German stamping 'traditions' are different than the Russian ones. Simply speaking these are tubes vs boxes. Even guns like G3 have quite a distinct manufacturing process than anything else made in Russia or US for example. In addition, AKM's used new sorts of steels, and relatively thicker ones to start with. 7. If you say that's a theory, its better to provide maybe Russian or German documents (these are available) which justify your point. Theory without any documentary support is nothing more than assumption. I'm sorry if my comment sounds a bit too rude I will be glad if anyone could provide me a memoirs, documents or anything documentary that could prove a point stated in the video, because that's relatively interesting topic
@ForgottenWeapons6 жыл бұрын
The Type 1/2/3 designations are not intended to be factory designations, they are the names in common use by the English-speaking community. As I said, the role of Schmeisser is disputed.
@ForgottenWeapons6 жыл бұрын
We don't normally use "type" as a synonym for "model", but we do use it to distinguish between different variations of something.
@باقرالزيادي-ر2غ5 ай бұрын
كلام رااائع جدا
@roosterj25992 жыл бұрын
The AK is the Swiss Army Knife of military rifles. The OG of select fire rifles. My heart melts everytime I see, shoot or handle one.
@hashbringer9756 жыл бұрын
I could be wrong, but if my memory serves me right, AKM recoil springs rod was flexible, multi part or something like that, at least the ones I have disassembled had that.
@myownidenity49554 жыл бұрын
My dad is a Machinist. Personally we prefer SKS over AK because neither of us has been able to get consistent accuracy from any AK variant as SKS. When Ian says "that worked" referring to type II. I could hear my dad 30 miles away saying "well duh". Though shouldering and carrying a tank turret isn't feasible in battle unless you are Jesse Ventura. I would love to someday own a type 1&2
@OLEG-gt2yt Жыл бұрын
It's just that some people have their hands attached right to their ass. Give any rifle to such assholes, they will definitely hole their leg with it.
@gregfair17496 жыл бұрын
Thanks for making such good knowledgeable videos on firearms!
@stevecolley67504 жыл бұрын
Forgotten Weapons Ian, I am pretty sure that what you constantly refer to as "Quality Control" issues are "Production Control" or "Production Quality" issues. Quality Control typically does not "create" issues /problems, rather it prevents issues /problems from being implemented /released out the door.
@RANDOMLETTERS11115 жыл бұрын
My mosin was made by the ishevsk factory
@kevinragsdale62565 жыл бұрын
I think I have a saiga that says ishevsk on it
@liammiddleton30645 жыл бұрын
Keep that gun
@josephf93245 жыл бұрын
Same mine is a 43
@Sepuku785 жыл бұрын
Its actually Izhevsk not Ishevsk but that’s a lot harder to pronounce
@Jamesbond228555 жыл бұрын
Same. 1943
@kohinarec65803 жыл бұрын
FF is among the best channels on youtube: informative, interesting, clear of fanaticism. Someone said on another video that this is not only about firearms but history, business dynamics, marketing, design, politics etc.
@abb17936 жыл бұрын
It seems like a big thing that doesn't get discussed a lot is a move from riveted stamped to later stamped AKs which I assume are spot welded stamped, particularly with so many of those rivets needing, or for whatever reason being ground flushed.
@paulmazyck45556 жыл бұрын
a quintuple upload? my morning is made
@c.b.giornesto45814 жыл бұрын
i found one of these in afghanistan in 2006, it was still in operation. what an excellent weapon
@JonasVilander3 жыл бұрын
That Type-1 example is B-E-A-UTIFUL. Compared to most folks, I've seen a lot of T1s, and none compared to the condition of this one! It's remarkable!
@johnmcclain38873 жыл бұрын
That's the first time I've ever gotten to see a "type one", only ever heard about them, most of fifty years, including two decades in the Corps. Semper Fi, thanks.
@RickyBobby420693 жыл бұрын
The most iconic gun of all time.
@wheel17752 жыл бұрын
It’s still amazing that this rifle was developed in 1947. It still looks contemporary.
@QurttoRco Жыл бұрын
For russian army maybe 🤣🤣🤣 every 1st world country uses polymer and optics as standart for decades
@MacDorsai6 жыл бұрын
I have heard an alternate theory regarding why the USSR went to the milled Type II and III. The explanation was that the USSR had an urgent need for stamping machinery for higher priority items and to keep workers employed at the mills as they transitioned the industry to stampings, the AK was changed to a milled receiver. By 1959, they had stamping capacity, and in the intervening years, Kalashnikov improved the stamped design.
@ForgottenWeapons6 жыл бұрын
Do you have any documentation of that theory?
@davidzhuxptnt6 жыл бұрын
Is that 4 Videos in an hour???
@raskolnikovsghost27016 жыл бұрын
re-uploads, don't have a heart attack
@garan1113 жыл бұрын
The rear handle is made of a material that is called ( Tekstalit). It's a "Composite epoxy material" Very common in sovient production. Also, AK Bayonet is made of the same material. It's Strong and cheap to produce.
@ekim000 Жыл бұрын
I had no idea how many differences there were between first production an AKM.
@DrJeffDrJeff3 жыл бұрын
If I heard correctly, Izhevsk Arsenal is where that early AK was made. If so, they also made Mosin-Nagants as well as the stuff Ian cited. I know this because I have a 1943 Mosin-Nagant, with a clear Izhevsk Arsenal mark.
@SRR-5657 Жыл бұрын
I thought it was funny that he said they didn't make that much stuff and weren't a major arsenal when they built millions of Mosins🤣
@rymondred94132 жыл бұрын
I have a 1956 Original AK 47 Russian, auto and semi too.
@amphibiousone79725 жыл бұрын
I noted you didn't mention, quite a few of the the biggest design changes . There are a few additional parts added mostly to the FCS, with the Type II and AKM. Mostly dealt with rate of fire and controllability. Many changes were made after the Type I. Many of the things that were ignored were directly related to the select fire system, so part of me thinks the exclusions were intentional. It would be a great video if you could have all four major variations, to compare. Thanks it was a fun video to watch 👍👊
@M8Military Жыл бұрын
It's hard to talk about how a full auto trigger mechanism works on KZbin for guidelines reasons
@stupit4677 ай бұрын
It's weird, here I go, training myself to call it AKM as that is almost always the actual rifle and then there's the honest to god AK-47 right there
@AustinAOkay5 жыл бұрын
I love you forgotten weapons!!!
@amerykanskipierdolic63464 жыл бұрын
His name is gun jesus
@gregfair17496 жыл бұрын
The AK is a vary good weapon! It is one of my top 5 rifles to own!
@ЧеловекЧпок3 жыл бұрын
Всем Привет из Ижевска😊
@Wolfplays-rt9kf3 жыл бұрын
I like the fluted gas piston. Seems like a sneaky way to save a little weight.
@shawnoandrew2 жыл бұрын
I had another partial type 3 set that I made a grip skeleton for and used a type 1 grip. I LIKED THAT GRIP BUT SOLD THE PARTS OFF.
@wyattcitizenzap45392 жыл бұрын
damn you Ian i couldn't resist this one.
@RobertoLoux3 жыл бұрын
This was in my recommended after Brandon’s most recent video about his Type 1 lol
@Bigcheese13344 жыл бұрын
So this a original ak-47 not an akm it's a miracle it survived this long
@80m63rM4n6 жыл бұрын
Just finished rewatching original videos on AK about two hours ago... What's the difference between the original video and this one? Did you just cut "47" from the name of the gun and added some comments?
@ForgottenWeapons6 жыл бұрын
Yes. The changes were not huge, but were important.
@sapiens49596 жыл бұрын
Maybe worth adding a changelog into the description for updates.
@tammysilverwolf10856 жыл бұрын
I suspect doing so would trigger YT"s de-monitization algos.
@TheKiruNias6 жыл бұрын
I think Ian cared more about accuracy than anything else. *insert puns about AK spread here*
@Landsharkitis6 жыл бұрын
Forgotten Weapons hell yeah
@floo14653 жыл бұрын
nice review of my product, comrade!
@OddStare5 жыл бұрын
What a gun what a gun, if i could choose a gun for an apocalypse i would take a AK47 robust, simple, reliable, mean loking the gun has it all
@chancedavis62165 жыл бұрын
No a preferable gun in a apocalypse. You'll want something more modern, easier to use, and uses more common ammunition. A AR-15, Mini-14, or something similar that uses .223 or 5.56 NATO would be a better choice do to lighter recoil, superior ballistics than 7.62x39 and the ability to carry more ammo.
@drdnout4 жыл бұрын
@@chancedavis6216 for 5.56mm best choice is AK-108.
@TheAxeBearer3 жыл бұрын
well, i'm kinda late for this, but, the letters that are stamped into the receiver are Г (which stands for G in word Godina, meaning year) and Ш is a cyrillic letter for a sound you make when pronouncing SH If anyone was interested in this fact
@marcrussette34673 ай бұрын
The brown Bess, the colt revolver and AK47 are truly genius for their time. What's next for us?
@anthonyburke5656 Жыл бұрын
Ian, at the risk of trying to teach my Grandmother how to suck eggs, may I suggest you consider a series on the “development” of cartridges and projectiles? I know the development of the 7.62 x 39 AND the projectile was quite detailed, even the angle of the shoulders on the cartridge and construction of the projectile etc. I’m sure the same happened with other cartridges. For example, everyone thinks the ,338 Lapua is the bees knees, but I really like the ,338 RUM.
@TheGearhead2223 жыл бұрын
Great video. as always. Excellent shots of the all important "safety sear" as the Russians call it. I now see how the safety sear spring holds it's pivot pin in place, along with the hammer and trigger pivot pins-ingenious!-John in Texas
@MK-Ultra-o7Ай бұрын
You mentioned the welds being a problem on the receiver.... Stamped metal doesn't like to be welded at all. Stampings have ridiculous internal tension. If you were to cut one in half (any stamping) the thing will flay open and the 2 halves will not make the same shape as before. This same stress when heated up by a weld actually relieves.... Which sounds good. But it's a localized relief. An unbalanced relief. Causing bending and twisting. I suspect the problems they had with the welds were actually that the welds were scrapping their receivers.
@MK-Ultra-o7Ай бұрын
Spot welds on an un bent (drawn to be technical) wouldn't do anything what would cause the biggest problem are those welds in the rear. In the corners. That's causing the problems.
@MeyerBen27 Жыл бұрын
You cover the stock and right after the bolt receiver it looks like a super cool 1911 style pistol with that grip lol
@TreacherousFennec Жыл бұрын
funny to think that the first issue magazines were made with thicker and more durable steel than the guns itself.
@JohnDoe-eo8ux2 жыл бұрын
They need to start making 7.62x39 AK pattern rifles with barrel twist rates that make sense. The roughly 1:10 barrel twist on most of these guns is terrible for stabilizing typical surplus 123 gr. bullets. This twist rate was selected for economical reasons, as it allowed the Soviets to continue to produce .30 cal barrels on the same old tooling they used for mosin nagant rifles. It made sense at the time for efficiencies sake, but they should have shifted production after the tooling wore out. Now the whole world thinks a 1:10 twist is the best way to produce 7.62x39 Kalashnikovs when in reality a 1:16 twist would be much better for typical surplus ammo.
@bluelotus55063 жыл бұрын
This weapon is never forgotten
@callsignbenzo12932 жыл бұрын
I would love to have a AK type 1 and an AR 10. Thats literally the best of both worlds. You're a lucky man if you own the first AR and the first AK I am very jealous of you
@pyrogothica39065 жыл бұрын
Izehvsk built quite a few mosins too. They were a pretty major factory in their day.
@MrMaxStalsky4 жыл бұрын
But it was not the home factory of Mosin Nagants. And Mosin died before that. So they had no major constructor in there at that time.
@BWo-bb1yw3 жыл бұрын
Schmeisser was held captive, working in the same building the AK was designed in, l think we can say he more than helped.
@NotBoeDusky1013 жыл бұрын
Schmeisser probably didnt there were far more prolific gun designers in Ussr like sudayev and he defo wouldn't work with a lone tanker who got injured at kursk
@jam3ohio6 жыл бұрын
Ian you mentioned that German support for Soviet stamping production allowed the Soviets to perfect stamping and to reintroduce stamped receivers. You also mentioned that this theory is disputed. Can you recommend some reading material that addresses this controversy?
@ForgottenWeapons6 жыл бұрын
Not really - it's an ongoing issue as more Soviet documentation is dug up by researchers in Russia.
@MegaMoriarti Жыл бұрын
I don't think Hugo, the best sheet metal engineer, was mopping the floor when this gun was being designed. Coincidentally, with other engineers at the same time, i.e. until 1952, he was in the same factory. Coincidentally, the early models had a problem with the quality of the stamping, and later the problem was solved ... probably redesigning the production a bit, and probably by upgrading the crew's qualifications.
@truktronton886 жыл бұрын
Hey Ian, I am a viewer from Indonesia. May I ask you something? Can you look into the AKs that our Marines and Police force still use? Because many years ago I read that the batch of AK we received from the Soviet was the first type of AK. And those are still in active service today.
@andrewsuryali85406 жыл бұрын
Kevin Tobing Police don't use original AKs anymore. The majority of police AKs were purchased after Suharto's downfall in '98 and they're in 5.56 NATO. The last 7.62 AKs went to army training school.
@DizBukHaPeter5 жыл бұрын
The Indonesian 5.56 AK's are made by Arsenal in Bulgaria
@Bootbandwarlord5 жыл бұрын
Indonesian Marines use the FN FNC and the Indonesian made version, the SS1 Pindad.
@strahinjastevic74803 жыл бұрын
Indonesia bought a batch of ak 101 (5.56), it was one of the few customers of that specific version. I dont know what branch got them tho
@DGFishRfine12 жыл бұрын
It's funny to think that this Type 1, built to be as inexpensive as possible, is now ludicrously valuable. (Assuming it's a US transferrable machine gun)
@dr.mighthaveknown91322 жыл бұрын
Epic video! Love it in 2022!
@jolanderphilip5 жыл бұрын
Love your videos Ian. Do you have any interest in the history of larger weapons...crew serve mortars and such?
@kirkmooneyham3 жыл бұрын
Mosin Nagants were manufactured at Ishevsk, as well as at Tula.
@maazahmed466473 жыл бұрын
IGI 1 still use them. And they are glorious.
@tallen45205 жыл бұрын
I have a VZ52 Police carbine (She' rifle- Czechoslavakia) in 7.62x39, with "A.K." stamped on the barrel shroud.
@SomewhereInSiberia3 жыл бұрын
Cyrillic letter reminding "r" for year is "г", first of год [god]. In US you trust in God. In Soviet Russia you count it
@cloroxlavenderscent43073 жыл бұрын
It's more like Ghod not God. Other than that Your pretty much spot on.
@SomewhereInSiberia3 жыл бұрын
@@cloroxlavenderscent4307 i dont agree, it is pronounced in standard russian as g without aspiration, gh is more ukrainian, belorussian or southern russian feature
@Tunkkis3 жыл бұрын
Do I remember correctly that Russian has three words for year, depending on what number the date ends in? I took two beginner courses of Russian in highschool, but don't remember much.
@SomewhereInSiberia3 жыл бұрын
@@Tunkkis no, you must be confused with grammar cases or counting, when we count we use old word "лето". For example 2020 год был тяжелым - year 2020 was hard Сделано в 2020 году - made in year 2020 Мне 30 лет - i'm 30 years old
@todydn2 жыл бұрын
Stamped sheet metal you say Kyhber pass smith:hold my spade shovel
@hunterharris6893 жыл бұрын
wow that bolt and bolt carrier look almost brand new