Formal charge and dot structures | Chemical bonds | Chemistry | Khan Academy

  Рет қаралды 690,717

Khan Academy Organic Chemistry

Khan Academy Organic Chemistry

Күн бұрын

Definition of formal charge, and how minimization of formal charge can help choose the more stable dot structure.
Watch the next lesson: www.khanacadem...
Missed the previous lesson? www.khanacadem...
Chemistry on Khan Academy: Did you know that everything is made out of chemicals? Chemistry is the study of matter: its composition, properties, and reactivity. This material roughly covers a first-year high school or college course, and a good understanding of algebra is helpful.
About Khan Academy: Khan Academy offers practice exercises, instructional videos, and a personalized learning dashboard that empower learners to study at their own pace in and outside of the classroom. We tackle math, science, computer programming, history, art history, economics, and more. Our math missions guide learners from kindergarten to calculus using state-of-the-art, adaptive technology that identifies strengths and learning gaps. We've also partnered with institutions like NASA, The Museum of Modern Art, The California Academy of Sciences, and MIT to offer specialized content.
For free. For everyone. Forever. #YouCanLearnAnything
Subscribe to Khan Academy’s Chemistry channel: / channel
Subscribe to Khan Academy: www.youtube.co...

Пікірлер: 97
@abdulharrison4380
@abdulharrison4380 4 жыл бұрын
It's been 4 years since a lot of you guys watched this video to learn a thing or two. Meaning, you guys have since graduated and most likely moved into the cooperate world at the moment. I hope you have a blessed life with your families. We're right behind as well. And thank you khan academy for being a blessing to soo many of us. Thank you!
@FATASSSOVIET
@FATASSSOVIET 9 жыл бұрын
You taught this much better than my Chem professor and He has a PhD.....
@raphaelmarcelo4411
@raphaelmarcelo4411 8 жыл бұрын
i have to agree with you :")
@GershanBarnardNorman
@GershanBarnardNorman 8 жыл бұрын
most professors are in actual fact hired as researchers, meaning their core function at the university is to do research, not to teach. my point is, Being good teachers is not their priority; their priority is to produce quality research papers, because universities aren't ranked according to the marks of students. They are ranked according to the most amount of quality research published.
@whatblank4157
@whatblank4157 8 жыл бұрын
that explains a lot. i only go to lectures just get to my clicker points.
@sylveriate
@sylveriate 7 жыл бұрын
A PhD in chemistry, not a PhD in education. Experts don't always make good teachers.
@marvelhasiholan5495
@marvelhasiholan5495 7 жыл бұрын
maybe you don't pay attention in class.
@joshpark2739
@joshpark2739 8 жыл бұрын
I have had 3 people try to explain to me what formal charge is and you did it in 8 mins. It isn't hard at all! Thank you!
@ratatat12356
@ratatat12356 9 жыл бұрын
whats the dot structure for a james bond?
@retrodude8586
@retrodude8586 4 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂
@abelkahsai9599
@abelkahsai9599 4 жыл бұрын
If you have question,use their website,link is in the description,there you'll see a list of there videos, click on the one you want, if it's not already highlighted ,then scroll down to the bottom of the page,it might sometimes take a bit to show up.there they have a conversation section, where there is a whole lot of answers to questions related to that specific video. There you could also signin and ask a question for yourselves. It's great really.As far as I know khan academy don't answer questions on KZbin's comment sections,they have integrated KZbin to their website,I think they use it as a way of getting revenue.There is MORE info about who they are(a non profit organization) and what they offer(free education) in the description.
@00eun2
@00eun2 9 жыл бұрын
After watching this video. I feel that dot structure and finding charge is not that difficult
@LunaticBiker11
@LunaticBiker11 7 жыл бұрын
cool
@hamedhosseini4938
@hamedhosseini4938 9 жыл бұрын
Thanks, very usefull
@theroadtoari3861
@theroadtoari3861 8 жыл бұрын
thank you guys so much. I couldn't understand it when my Professor lectured today.
@austinlindquist7584
@austinlindquist7584 9 жыл бұрын
Quick question, how do you know that the Hydrogens are attached to the oxygens rather than the sulfur?
@masterchief1372
@masterchief1372 7 жыл бұрын
Something to with it being an acid I think
@josephsherby
@josephsherby 6 жыл бұрын
You might already know this by now because it’s been two years, but we know the hydrogen’s are attached to the oxygen because they will dissociate in water, so they must easily break off. It’s how all acids are, I believe.
@kuanlinpaihan
@kuanlinpaihan 9 жыл бұрын
thumbs up if khan is ur lord and savior
@LunaticBiker11
@LunaticBiker11 7 жыл бұрын
u are my lord and savior
@seeksolace2059
@seeksolace2059 6 жыл бұрын
Lord and savior.........nah
@bryced2846
@bryced2846 6 жыл бұрын
only Jesus is
@atiksh2004
@atiksh2004 5 жыл бұрын
@@bryced2846 no
@alexcoreablecoreable
@alexcoreablecoreable 9 жыл бұрын
is it right to say VE in bonded atom?i believe since the electrons are shared, the electrons shared between one bond plus the lone pair(s) should be all considered VE? isn't better to describe it as formal charge=VE in free atom - lone pair - 1/2shared electron, it may look more complicated tho.
@tunneltrance
@tunneltrance 8 жыл бұрын
is there a difference tho? for memorizing purposed I think this video's explanation of it is easier. Is there any situation where this video's method would not work?
@raymondkanabr9770
@raymondkanabr9770 9 жыл бұрын
Very nice video. I think what would make it perfect is if the sub titles did not cover some of the work. Other than that; the video was very helpful.
@superiorchocolate6886
@superiorchocolate6886 8 жыл бұрын
U literally saved me thank-you so much😃 but in our books the formula is no.valence electron -no of unshared electrons -1/2the no of shared electrons . like if we use your formula we will get same ans in every case?
@shaghayegh4888
@shaghayegh4888 7 жыл бұрын
the final answer will be same as this solution. so, dont care about difference
@calebisaac4919
@calebisaac4919 8 жыл бұрын
life saver, thank you so much :)
@bettyagajyelleh8043
@bettyagajyelleh8043 7 жыл бұрын
thank you! so helpful
@tedstudt8550
@tedstudt8550 6 жыл бұрын
thanks so much!!!
@dalilarobledodebasabe191
@dalilarobledodebasabe191 8 жыл бұрын
Awesome!
@ChickpeaBlues
@ChickpeaBlues 9 жыл бұрын
We always did coordinate covalent bonds for sulfuric acid.
@erickamau8144
@erickamau8144 7 жыл бұрын
well put
@charlesrosenthal3511
@charlesrosenthal3511 9 жыл бұрын
So are we trying to get the formal charge of every atom to 0?
@avijitdey992
@avijitdey992 7 жыл бұрын
Charles Rosenthal Because compounds which exists in our nature have a formal charge of zero. Molecules with a formal charge more than zero is generally not available in nature
@albadadkola3301
@albadadkola3301 8 жыл бұрын
thanks 😊
@108mtsan
@108mtsan 8 жыл бұрын
Haha you are Japanese. :)
@albadadkola3301
@albadadkola3301 8 жыл бұрын
Oh no ! 😂 I'm not japanese , I'm just a Naruto fan
@occupytosavetheworld
@occupytosavetheworld 6 жыл бұрын
Concise
@alissajeanfreau7741
@alissajeanfreau7741 7 жыл бұрын
Why does it matter to move around the structure when the overall formal charge was already 0 because the Sulfur was +2 and the two Oxygen's were -1. 2 -1 -1 = 0. Please explain
@jiminchiii5341
@jiminchiii5341 6 жыл бұрын
Uhm...can I ask how to know if it is a posive or negative??
@rafidayad4143
@rafidayad4143 8 жыл бұрын
thanks
@Gooners0710
@Gooners0710 8 жыл бұрын
anyone please tell me the significance of formal charge...why we calculate it?#i know how to calculate# so please don't tell me how to calculate it....just tell me why we calculate it?
@seanhartwick2243
@seanhartwick2243 8 жыл бұрын
Fireblaze 1998 The reason to calculate formal charge is to see which structure you would actually find in the real world. Real world structures are as close to a formal charge of zero as possible.
@coolmanmomo12345
@coolmanmomo12345 9 жыл бұрын
my techer said the formal charge is the number of valance electrons for the molecule minus the number of bonds with the molecules minus the number of unpaired electrons I have checked using this method and got same results. but might there be an exception or something?
@abelkahsai9599
@abelkahsai9599 4 жыл бұрын
The same,its just a different way of thinking about it.
@pravintiwari8777
@pravintiwari8777 7 жыл бұрын
but bond pair means electron involved in making bond then have you included lone pairs electron too in the formula explain/.
@zenosaa8655
@zenosaa8655 7 жыл бұрын
Oxygen has 6 VE. While bond formation the Oxygen and other atom ,say Sulphur has to lend an e- to form a bond but u have drawn 7 e- in the terminal oxygen atom . How?
@abidaadhil9777
@abidaadhil9777 3 жыл бұрын
99 duriarion -1.-9
@SRS-wu6sz
@SRS-wu6sz Жыл бұрын
Hello these concepts are now in class 11😅
@squigglxs00
@squigglxs00 9 жыл бұрын
I may have not caught this while watching the video, but towards the end, why is he trying to get the formal charge closest to 0?
@avijitdey992
@avijitdey992 7 жыл бұрын
Naomi Castro Because compounds which exists in our nature have a formal charge of zero. Molecules with a formal charge more than zero is generally not available in nature.
@allyanaalbor3422
@allyanaalbor3422 4 жыл бұрын
Sulur had more than 8 electrons and some were lacking. This gave me confusion because you didn't obey the octet rule
@daybreak2127
@daybreak2127 4 жыл бұрын
Sulfur doesn't have to obey the octet rule, it is on the 3rd row of the periodic table.
@megansaul-escobar9619
@megansaul-escobar9619 7 жыл бұрын
How is it that Sulfur can form 6 bonds?
@LunaticBiker11
@LunaticBiker11 7 жыл бұрын
nah fooooool
@jordyvandenbempt2409
@jordyvandenbempt2409 7 жыл бұрын
how does the top oxygen form a bond with S as if it has 7 electrons?
@LunaticBiker11
@LunaticBiker11 7 жыл бұрын
i love u
@angelovaldez7612
@angelovaldez7612 7 жыл бұрын
someone pls, why need to minimize formal charge of central atom?
@baha17222
@baha17222 5 жыл бұрын
Angelo Valdez the formal charge is related to the energy level of the structure. Lone pairs have higher energy level than bonded pairs so the oxygens formed a double bond. The effect of this change is minimizing the formal charge. So when drawing a structure the one with the least formal charge is probably the most accurate one because it has the least energy and is the most stable
@beautifulpakpk1594
@beautifulpakpk1594 8 жыл бұрын
nitrogen provide one bond that two electrons are from nitrogen.
@adonis1168
@adonis1168 8 жыл бұрын
such a simple thing dwelled on for what it seemed like hours. just get to the point
@FRAUSTIN867
@FRAUSTIN867 9 жыл бұрын
How does sulfur form 6 bonds?
@shawncarlson1880
@shawncarlson1880 9 жыл бұрын
+austin straub Octet rule exception
@santoryu8940
@santoryu8940 9 жыл бұрын
+Shawn Carlson whats the octet rule exception?
@shawncarlson1880
@shawncarlson1880 9 жыл бұрын
Dog that was 16 weeks ago I forgot haha
@venkatmourya5117
@venkatmourya5117 7 жыл бұрын
It can have a expanded octet
@LunaticBiker11
@LunaticBiker11 7 жыл бұрын
yeeeeeeeee
@tendertv5769
@tendertv5769 7 жыл бұрын
nice
@ezpzwins7613
@ezpzwins7613 4 жыл бұрын
Whats a formal charge
@abelkahsai9599
@abelkahsai9599 4 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/gaeYqmaqbs-mn5Y
@sakama40
@sakama40 9 жыл бұрын
N has 5 electrons, where is the last one (NH4)
@shawncarlson1880
@shawncarlson1880 9 жыл бұрын
+joe xtz It was NH4+. the + meaning it loses an electron. therefore it was one less.
@sabrinamartino849
@sabrinamartino849 8 жыл бұрын
How is nitrogen in group 5 ? i thought it was 15?
@albadadkola3301
@albadadkola3301 8 жыл бұрын
its atomic no is 15 so arranging umm its k shell has 2 e L shell has 5 e and its outermost/valence M shell has 5 e , the group no. represents the no of valence e therefore N is in grp 5
@sabrinamartino849
@sabrinamartino849 8 жыл бұрын
ohhh okay thank you
@noatreiman
@noatreiman 8 жыл бұрын
its atomic number is definitely not 15
@rishijagtap1177
@rishijagtap1177 8 жыл бұрын
it's atomic number is 7 and and it is in group 15 which is also known as V-A(5). And by the way you're right . Naruchi Uzumaki has explained it. But he/she is wrong about atomic number
@albadadkola3301
@albadadkola3301 8 жыл бұрын
RiSHi JagTaP Yeah yeah u're correct sry I messed up with the atomic no
@thefryingpan951
@thefryingpan951 7 жыл бұрын
wait i dont get it, oxygen only has 6 valence electrons, Sulfur only has 6 valence electrons, why do you give Oxygen 7, and then sulfur 4?
@abelkahsai9599
@abelkahsai9599 4 жыл бұрын
Watch their video on formal charges and resonance Website link:- www.khanacademy.org/science/chemistry/chemical-bonds/copy-of-dot-structures/v/formal-charge?modal=1 KZbin link:- kzbin.info/www/bejne/gaeYqmaqbs-mn5Y The 7 electrons for oxygen or the 4 electrons for sulfur are actually not the valency electron, ever thing is explained in the videos.
@abidaadhil9777
@abidaadhil9777 3 жыл бұрын
9
@hopesy12u4
@hopesy12u4 9 жыл бұрын
Am I the only one who thinks that the "octet" of electrons around oxygen in H2SO4 are a bit off?
@repentandbelieveinjesus33
@repentandbelieveinjesus33 4 жыл бұрын
@Kevin Nguyen ya i was getting really confused by it
@abelkahsai9599
@abelkahsai9599 4 жыл бұрын
The octer rule could be off, for elements in and above the third period, since sulphur is in the 3rd period,it is acceptable if it has more than 8 electrons
@abidaadhil9777
@abidaadhil9777 3 жыл бұрын
1
@tyepete2236
@tyepete2236 9 жыл бұрын
slow down!!!
@LunaticBiker11
@LunaticBiker11 7 жыл бұрын
skrrrt
@abidaadhil9777
@abidaadhil9777 3 жыл бұрын
@it 77
@MG-hm8rk
@MG-hm8rk 7 жыл бұрын
Donde esta mi hijo sal
@santoshsaroj9685
@santoshsaroj9685 5 жыл бұрын
Sabhi ko english nahi aati hai sir
@jackperry6605
@jackperry6605 7 жыл бұрын
this is wrong, the oxygens have to be more electronegative then the sulfer.
@sonnajensen4824
@sonnajensen4824 7 жыл бұрын
Why? The least electronegative atom always, or at least almost always, belongs in the center of the molecular structure. Sulfer is less electronegative than oxygen.
Resonance and dot structures | Chemical bonds | Chemistry | Khan Academy
6:15
Khan Academy Organic Chemistry
Рет қаралды 308 М.
Drawing dot structures | Chemical bonds | Chemistry | Khan Academy
14:42
Khan Academy Organic Chemistry
Рет қаралды 518 М.
пришла на ДР без подарка // EVA mash
01:25
EVA mash
Рет қаралды 3,3 МЛН
New Colour Match Puzzle Challenge - Incredibox Sprunki
00:23
Music Playground
Рет қаралды 43 МЛН
It's the natural ones that are the most beautiful#Harley Quinn #joker
01:00
Harley Quinn with the Joker
Рет қаралды 19 МЛН
Resonance Structures/Assigning Formal Charge
12:32
Professor Dave Explains
Рет қаралды 566 М.
Lewis diagrams for molecules | Chemistry | Khan Academy
14:38
Khan Academy
Рет қаралды 6 М.
Lewis Structures, Introduction, Formal Charge, Molecular Geometry, Resonance, Polar or Nonpolar
2:13:38
Electronegativity and bonding | Structure and bonding | Organic chemistry | Khan Academy
9:22
Khan Academy Organic Chemistry
Рет қаралды 625 М.
How To Draw Lewis Structures
11:50
The Organic Chemistry Tutor
Рет қаралды 2,7 МЛН
Resonance
11:51
Khan Academy
Рет қаралды 959 М.
Electronegativity and bonding | Chemical bonds | Chemistry | Khan Academy
11:39
Khan Academy Organic Chemistry
Рет қаралды 772 М.
Formal Charges Made Easy
8:08
ketzbook
Рет қаралды 24 М.
An Actually Good Explanation of Moles
13:37
Steve Mould
Рет қаралды 1,5 МЛН