This is probably the only "compare everything to Star Wars" comment that's actually relevant
@notagooglesimp8722Күн бұрын
My 2005 ish Tie bomber toy is mint and one of my favorites. I just wish it was more accurate and would hold 2 crew. My LAAT can hold like 12 guys, 2 pilots and 2 addon gunner stations, not included.
@EikaiwaGakkoКүн бұрын
And probably many of the "Uglies" from the Star Wars Legends universe Kilrathi designs from Wing Commander 3 and onward.
@williamzk9083Күн бұрын
"Normal" single engine propeller aircraft are not symmetrical and have hidden asymmetry to deal with propeller rotation and circulation that often gave them notorious and dangerous handling. The Grumman Bearcat had its engine canted down and to one side to deal with asymmetry. The Corsair had to have stall strips added on one wing to ensure it stalled at the same time as they other. The aircraft was called the ensign eliminator before this. The Macchi C.202 Folgore left wing 21 cm (8 3/8 in) longer than the right wing. The larger wing created more lift which tended to roll the fighter right, opposing and thereby counteracting the torque and P-factor. The Me 109 had the vertical tail fin built like a wing to counter p factor. Many aircraft had the exhaust canted to create thrust to counter prop torgue. Both the Corsair and Me 109 had one wing stall ahead of the other due to propeller rotation in the 3 point sitting angle eventually had their tail yokes extended to raise the sitting angle. Most aircraft had some combination of the above. "Found and Explained" should celebrate Dr Richard Vogt of Blohm and Voss's birthday as he gave so many odd looking aircraft that actually worked and helps us to understand aerodynamics.
@lighthousegravyP51Күн бұрын
Ladies and gentlemen of the internet, I present to you the winner of the Longest Comment Award. 🎉🎉🎉
@larrybremer4930Күн бұрын
I came here to say the same. When you put a high torque motor on a large prop and jump on the throttles at low speed the P-factor causes you to roll left, and given enough power that roll can be a snap inversion. The Corsair you mentioned had a habit or turning turtle when landing when handled by the unwary and yes, it eliminated many a "butter bar". I used to build and fly RC aircraft and mounting the engine on a wedge to angle it as you mentioned is common practice to even out the handling. Blohm & Voss had some brilliant engineers to come up a novel solution to the P-factor problem along with designing and building some other incredible aircraft, in particular the BV 222 flying boat.
@darrencrosby4520Күн бұрын
Great point
@williamzk9083Күн бұрын
@@larrybremer4930 A BV-141 would make a very interesting and fascinating RC aircraft. it would certainly attract a lot of curiosity. Do you remember the original 1965 movie "Flight of the Phoenix" with Jummy Stewart. They crash land a Fairchild C-82 Packet twin boom plane in the dessert and the Heinrich Dorfmann, an aeronautical engineer build a sort of asymmetrical BV141 out of one of the booms. It turns out Heinrich Dorfmann is only a radio controlled model builder and the team became demoralised but Dorfmann has done his calculation correctly and they fly out on the asymmetrical aircraft.
@5co756Күн бұрын
@@larrybremer4930 Isn't there a video from a F4U carrier start , were it rolls to the left after starting and crashing into the ocean .
@LaraineBouguerКүн бұрын
Blohm and Voss' design department lived by the credo, "Normal is boring." And yes, we would love to have you cover the Ares and the other Rutan designs.
@snake45aimanКүн бұрын
Flying industry Kel-tech
@26th_PrimarchКүн бұрын
@@snake45aiman Damn straight.
@edwardnormal17 сағат бұрын
Nazi skunkworks
@Bacteriophagebs14 сағат бұрын
@@snake45aiman Including how they never actually got any military contracts.
@CraigCholarКүн бұрын
My favorite Luftwaffe Airfix 1/72nd scale model from my early teen modeling days, in the 1970s, was this unconventional (to say the least) recon plane. I still have that kit and many others in boxes tucked away in the garage.
@rifqifm6434Күн бұрын
You should do more aircraft designed by B&V They designed alot of asymetrical plane.
@Shinzon23Күн бұрын
I always love weird wacky designs like this goes to show you that you don't always have to follow the rest of the crowd
@LastGoatKnightКүн бұрын
And also that sometimes function is over looks
@franklinpresident4990Күн бұрын
imagine if war Thunder added German prototype. Germany will never be greater
@SturmvaporКүн бұрын
Awesome work! Don't forget the Rutan Boomerang :D
@rocketguru9298Күн бұрын
Give yourself a pat on the back for actually using the word ‘WACKY’ in your title card. It made me laugh out loud. I love the BV-141 design. Usually it’s ’Cutting Edge, Ahead of its time, or Extreme’ when discussing the unique concepts of the Luftwaffe.
@lamia197Күн бұрын
Rutan Model 202 Boomerang: asymmetricalplane lives!!
@Ugly_German_TruthsКүн бұрын
Aesthetically great. Economically not as much.
@anaviationenthusiastКүн бұрын
thank you for mentioning this!!! exactly what i was looking for
@LegorocketsAnimation21 сағат бұрын
I was wondering if this one was left out because it was civilian instead of military like the other ones mentioned in the video
@AubriGryphonКүн бұрын
I was not aware that Rutan had proposed a warplane. I'd love to see that video!
@jet_flyerКүн бұрын
You mentioned Ares but not Burt Rutan's other asymmetrical masterpiece Boomerang lol. it's asymmetry was actually on purpose to try and mitigate the adverse yaw from an engine failure
@Historyfreak-f7o3 сағат бұрын
That was my comment too. A true visionary and a man ahead of his time.
@LastGoatKnightКүн бұрын
My beloved recon plane. Ever since I knew its existence I knew that it would be my favourite recon plane of WWII
@kennys9644Күн бұрын
Same here.
@CraigCholarКүн бұрын
Mine too.
@SethAriel-ey4uxКүн бұрын
Gidday Nick. Asymmetrical aircraft is a very interesting concept. I am very interested in ww2 aircraft, and i have spent many hours reading books and watching videos about them. I am very surprised l have never heard about them. But I guess it goes to show that you are definitely a pro at researching and finding out about exotic aircraft and concepts. Thanks so much for all the effort you put into these videos. Kia Ora from nz Seth
@TylerR909Күн бұрын
Every single pilot on the planet who started training in C172s/C152/Piper/Cirrus is going to be very disturbed to hear they couldn't see through the propeller this entire time.
@robin53957 сағат бұрын
Finally someone who says bmv and not bmdouble-u
@StefOne-nw9unКүн бұрын
glad you mentioned scaled composites in the end, but i missed their boomerang ;-)
@CGM_68Күн бұрын
13:39 One on display at the Royal Air Force Museum in the UK, another in Technikmuseum Speyer Germany.
@seranonimo677022 сағат бұрын
How did bro not talk about that civillian plane in the end 😭
@Historyfreak-f7o3 сағат бұрын
Burt Rutan made his own version of this. Very cool!
@gabbyhayes4561Сағат бұрын
As young preteen, I would seek out unusual model planes to build. Found the BV 141 at the local model shop. This was the most unusual plane I've built. I do believe it was in a "Raiders of the lost Ark" movies. 🇺🇸😎
@TheNewOrder-DaysOfConflictКүн бұрын
This thing would give a big emotional damage to OCD people
@majorbloodnok6659Күн бұрын
How about the asymmetric, biplane Gotha bomber from WW1?
@BackyardEngineering123Күн бұрын
Thats some real backyard engineering right there!
@x_hibernia20 сағат бұрын
Really is there not a huge blind spot on the left of the plane?
@blendpinexus141623 сағат бұрын
i sorta want a little private ownership aimed plane that follows this sort of design. it's really strange and cool.
@NoPegsКүн бұрын
Happy Seasonal Thingy F&E! =3
@300guyКүн бұрын
You mean HaloThanksMasYears?
@notagooglesimp8722Күн бұрын
Last version of the BV 141 with prop and jet. NOW THIS IS POD RACING
@LeandroCB-w8hКүн бұрын
I would really like a video on the ARES
@spud483919 сағат бұрын
I forgot about this thing 😭😭😭
@tirebiter1680Күн бұрын
Trump thinks we should get some of these for the USAF. Why? Because both the pilot and the passenger are in the right wing.
@pawarom_0790Күн бұрын
😂😂😂
@26th_PrimarchКүн бұрын
Cringe
@PhilbyFavouritesКүн бұрын
Underrated sir 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
@juanmanuelpenaloza9264Күн бұрын
LoL
@Wills420913Күн бұрын
good one...
@pablogodoy9241Күн бұрын
Waited for this one,another weird desing is the Piaggio p180 avanti
@silwerwingКүн бұрын
The dive bomber concepts reminds of the planes of Crimson Skies.
@Matthew-kb7xkКүн бұрын
I joined just as it ended
@notagooglesimp8722Күн бұрын
That thing could have been the replacement for the JU-87 and a great costal defence plane. Could scout. Carry one big central torpedo, long range. Lots of variants. While the 109 should carry on but be more standardized rapidly like the K was with wrapping things up into one total package.
@ltdada74Күн бұрын
@@notagooglesimp8722 ze Germans fckd up with all their non-standardized variants of everything…and they still do it till this day, just look at all the 911’s types on the market
@ummabdullah5948Сағат бұрын
Please Make next animation video about Turkeys new Kaan TFX 5th gen fighter
@Kruger_Mk1Күн бұрын
This plane got my interest a few hours ago then this 🔥 dropped.
@Blindbrick2Күн бұрын
11:56 That's a very happy shark 😁
@KhaoticKalm8 сағат бұрын
As someone who has found apathetic comfort being slave to their ocd, I hate asymmetric planes 😂
@user-2uf2kr2cКүн бұрын
Looks like giant flying "blind spot"....
@TheKingTiger503Күн бұрын
That's a BV-141 Scout plane, The Second one is BV-237 A-1 with single engine While the Other one is BV-237 B-1 with two different engines the Jet Engine and the single engine propeller..
@Clark-l6z23 сағат бұрын
Can't see thru the prop. That explains why so many walk into a spinning propeller. Sarcasm intended.
@BobPruett13 сағат бұрын
14:00 More superior than the A-10? BLASPHEMPY!
@gbresalekingКүн бұрын
I need to build a model kit of this!
@alfnoakes392Күн бұрын
There is a better one than the Airfix kit cannot remember the maker though (too long ago) ... I'm sure someone will help ...
@MarkusSnyman-t5oКүн бұрын
Hobbyboss@@alfnoakes392
@normalwaffleКүн бұрын
This thing reminds me of the Rutan Boomerang so much
@sparky4878Күн бұрын
Did he say it’s hard to see through a spinning prop and it blocks the view?
@gamegalaxy7229Күн бұрын
Makeup video about the project pluto
@300guyКүн бұрын
Yes, the Argus engines of the FW189 were surplus to requirements, whereas the BMW-801 (WHY you call it BMV?) were pretty much all reserved for the FW-190. By the time they started using Junkers Jumo and Daimler Benz 605's in the Later 190D and TA152 the BV time had passed.
@Ugly_German_TruthsКүн бұрын
The german pronunciation of w is pretty much veh, so bae EM veh
@mpow3r972Күн бұрын
Yeah, I didn't know "W" was now V. I'm normally not the type of guy to be a stickler for mispronunciations, especially if things aren't in your native tongue, but dude "W" doesn't not equal "V" in English, even in Aussie or Kiwi English lol
@wmcapriceforumКүн бұрын
The German pronunciation of BMW is bee em vee.
@conradmcmahon9323Күн бұрын
Bayerische Moteren Werke, werke being pronounced 'vairker', seems odd to us English speakers
@vidarhenning9025Күн бұрын
The "V" would also be pronounced as "Fau" in german... VW is FolksWagen as you know.
@bigmock14116 сағат бұрын
Right hand drive to absolute
@Dododo7397Күн бұрын
this has been my favorite plane for years lol
@gamegalaxy7229Күн бұрын
Makeup video about the Boeing yA1
@bukwok5 сағат бұрын
the voice very familiar, is the guy from top gear youtube channel ,his last name ford?
@dannypipewrench533Күн бұрын
I always find asymmetrical designs interesting.
@wheelwrightpl9429Күн бұрын
The 3d quality of models used is abysmal.
@Shinzon23Күн бұрын
...he's not made of money you know.
@unknown_user-0000-ooooКүн бұрын
Why not?
@plunder1956Күн бұрын
Was someone ar B&V talking to CLUNK from the Vulture Squadron? Because this looks like an aircraft from a cartoon.
@joechess7649Күн бұрын
You should do the bv pod racer! P-170
@C.I...Күн бұрын
...but you can see perfectly fine through a moving propeller. The engine being forward of the pilot restricting visibility below the horizontal is a problem, but your diagrams and narration seem to imply that pilots flew while looking at a circular wall immediately in front of them...
@MizanQistinaКүн бұрын
It's like Millenium Falcon
@victorgastonhernandezmarti5451Күн бұрын
I Call it “the Star Wars plane”
@anotherbacklogКүн бұрын
This video tortured my symmetry OCD for 14 minutes. I can imagine the German general got his symmetry fix after seeing the Fw189. And this channel really needs some War Thunder sponsorship.
@MbahGundam9021Күн бұрын
I guess BV really hates OCD people
@p51amustangКүн бұрын
Rather than unbalanced, maybe asymmetric is a better term.
@FoundAndExplainedКүн бұрын
i couldn’t think of a way to describe it to someone who doesn’t know what asymmetric means
@mv611320 сағат бұрын
Blohm Voss doing LSD before LSD
@collinwatson2857Күн бұрын
Do the scaled composite ares
@paulgeorge7557Күн бұрын
Yes sir we would really love to see it
@bsquaredbundles23 сағат бұрын
I smell WT premiums...
@KomradZX1989Күн бұрын
I miss your old sort little intro. I miss that little jingle 😂🤪
@julianreymus1721Күн бұрын
Forgetting the Rutan Boomerang?
@RetroAmateur1989Күн бұрын
FaE in the title: "The plane that was unbalanced... on purpose" FaE few seconds in: "It's more stable than a mirrored plane" So that title was a total lie.
@kevroodenman3283Күн бұрын
ih brom and Viss the V222 was it copied in 747 its very similar?
@boogerbombstudios-jn3edКүн бұрын
How does this thing even fly…
@konekillerkingКүн бұрын
Asymmetrical yes, unbalanced no.
@emanuelsanchez9362Күн бұрын
Please make a video of the ares
@roelantverhoeven3713 сағат бұрын
I love those!
@stefaneer9120Күн бұрын
This plane inspired George Lucas for the #Bwing Bomber in the 1983 Star Wars Movie.
@curbowmanКүн бұрын
Please, do the ARES video!
@MangoTroubles-007Күн бұрын
Happy Holidays from Christmas Island 🇨🇽
@eduardostapenko6808Күн бұрын
WW2 was not in russia. there were no russia there.
@sparky4878Күн бұрын
Russia was a state in the USSR
@eduardostapenko6808Күн бұрын
@@sparky4878 so was ukraine and others
@MrMaximkozin20 сағат бұрын
Yes ARES video please!
@harrythedemigodКүн бұрын
I honestly think its kind of a beautiful plane
@MaticTheProtoКүн бұрын
Why are you saying the bomb weight in pounds? The Germans back then already used modern units
@navigatorstrato7232Күн бұрын
非常棒的动画
@kennys9644Күн бұрын
Its so beautiful.
@Opozit1Күн бұрын
Nah - I like symmetry
@Concavenator_corcovatusКүн бұрын
Let’s go!!!!!
@divermike8943Күн бұрын
Wasn’t that plan in Raders of the Lost Ark?😜
@JohnSmith-lw2bmКүн бұрын
Bmv engines? You mean BMW?
@sparky4878Күн бұрын
W is pronounced as a V in German.
@stealthpro123Күн бұрын
I love this plane
@MartinCHorowitzКүн бұрын
engines were BMW not bmv
@sparky4878Күн бұрын
In German W is pronounced as a V.
@MartinCHorowitz16 сағат бұрын
@@sparky4878 yes but this video is in english
@prajwalnandan8728Күн бұрын
Brother how about you make a video HAL Marut first indigenously developed jet fighter-bomber in India
@FlywithMagnarКүн бұрын
Unsubscribed. It is not the propeller that prevents you from seeing, it is the engine.
@elektrykandrzejКүн бұрын
1:27 propeller? bro just forgot about the entire engine
@hugoramalho5557Күн бұрын
YES !!!
@roadsofjapan6009Күн бұрын
No idea why the BF110 could have easily done this job with slight adjustments, it was fast enough in the early years of the war and with the right pilot could have out run all allied planes of the time, truely a wonderful plane, it could take the damage and it could be trimmed to absorb the damage.
@konekillerkingКүн бұрын
Engines. Engines played a big part.
@alganhar1Күн бұрын
And vision. This was a RECON plane, it needed better vision, especially down, than the 110 allowed for. Thats the reason for that fully glazed nose section. The 110 would have been alright early war as a Photo recon aircraft, but that's a slightly different role to a pure recon aircraft. Though its worth putting some perspective on PRU aircraft fielded by the allies here. The British used modified Spitfires and Mosquito's for their Photo recon aircraft. Completely unarmed, and blazingly fast. Much, much faster than a 110.... You want a PRU aircraft to be able to survive to bring back its photographs. That means either a higher altitude than the enemy can comfortably reach, or speed greater than the enemy can easily manage.... The 110 could do neither of those mid to late war.
@AllisonCollins-r8wКүн бұрын
yes :)
@STAROMEGA54Күн бұрын
Absolutely useless
@alexander1485Күн бұрын
BMV? It's BMW.
@williamzk9083Күн бұрын
Yes the W sound in the German alphabet sounds like a V and the V sound is like an F. The narrator pronounced correctly, according to German alphabet sound but the speech to text treated it as English.