Four Star Trek Films Now In Development!

[@Phantassm]

I'll believe it when the films are released.

[@MaxLaingDMP]

I hear you! However, even after a film is made and ready for distribution, some bean counter at the studio could convince the decision makers that it would be more financially advantageous to "shelve" the film and write the entire project off as a "true" loss plus whatever they can calculate as what would have been their "potential" loss (what their sales might have been after a theater run). So, to build on your original belief, I won't "believe it" until it is in a box ready for check out - available for streaming - OR BOTH! ~ Ha!

[@ihno45]

I guess you will remain a non-believer then. :D

[@MaxLaingDMP]

@@ihno45 ~ Indeed!

[@burtonwilliams5355]

DITTO !

[@sodorflubbs5000]

Yes but I do believe that people have forgotten that as well as financial issues, the pandemic and strikes there was one very important thing. I think the death of Anton Yelchin would have made things difficult too. Especially as they said they wouldn’t just replace him.

[@eamonnbrereton1525]

Does anyone remember the days when we got 20 plus episodes of TNG a year ?

[@nunya___]

Looking at credits of _"Peacemaker"_ they had 22 accountants but produced only 8 episodes. It seems no one wants to work all year but everyone wants a job. It's so long between episodes of current shows that I forget the storyline! lol

[@STho205]

TOS had avg of 27 a year. Many other dramas of 1967 had 30 so rather consistent with Westerns and detective/law/spy shows. TNG had avg of 26 which was fairly standard. Today there are three live action ST series a year running 10 each. So 30. More of you count cartoons and shorts Just if you only like one....then it is UK level of short season. If you like two you'll get 20 weeks. It is unlikely you'll like 3 or 4 of the sets. They pitch to drastically different audiences.

[@otomicans6580]

The shows did a lot with very little. There are a ton of asides about how Data operates, for example, that don't have any special effects. The special effects are just the dialogue that makes the world seem more lived-in. I really liked the episode where Obrien was shocked at how risky it was that Ro re-routed power to a console on the bridge. All they did was turn a light on, but for the viewer it adds a lot of unpredictability to the plot: Ro is smart but she's a loose canon and who knows if her judgement is correct or not. So, sure, they had to make a-plot and b-plot last long enough with a bare minimum budget. But what that means is the plots, the acting, the cliffhangers and the world building needed to be interesting enough to carry the viewer through each episode.

[@STho205]

@@otomicans6580 in TOS most of the modern CGI effects were just dialog. Enterprise and the task force Sulu brought back to Organia was attacked by an entire Klingon FLEET....Except there was no Klingon ship model until season 3. At best they were blips on Checkov's station panel...which itself was just art on cardstock. Reason Romulans in S3 used Klingon design is Paramount lost the contract with the freelance prop master that built the original S1 model. They didn't pay his bill...so they used stock shots in S2 then decided to use the new AMT/ Jeffries model in S3.

[@voltinator]

@@STho205 Yet I can't remember a single story from any of these new Trek shows?

[@stopgeorge]

Here's a twist -- how about hire some, you know, good "Science Fiction" writers and do something post-TNG?!!

[@redelephantsdotnl]

They did that. It's called Deep Space Nine and it's *awesome*

[@nicks3935]

@@redelephantsdotnl TNG DS9 and Voyager were all roughly the same era of time. I believe that he was referring to doing something in a post TNG era like TNG was to TOS.

[@KNYHT.FIRE-1]

YYYES!!! ❤

[@neutrino78x]

We don't really want post TNG, they did that with Discovery when the ship went into the future... I think what fans of TNG want is a continuation of the TNG/DS9/VOY era!! 🙂 That is to say....STAR TREK LEGACY!!! 🙂

[@stopgeorge]

@@neutrino78x Seven, Raffi and Jack? No thanks.

[@justachipn3039]

*STAR TREK Must Never Die !!!*

[@kerry-j4m]

I'd like to see a new crew and ship set in the future,like how they did TNG. New enemies,creatures and new worlds to explore. Live Long and Prosper.

[@voltinator]

You're probably going to get a Next Generation reboot with a completely CGI Data, a Deanna Troi loaded with tattoos and a Geordi whose VISOR shoots lasers.

[@wildbill4496]

That's basically what the last couple seasons of STD have been. The future of Star Trek is bleak.

[@wildbill4496]

@@voltinator Troi would be trans in a reboot

[@LawrenceKaneshiro]

Kind of like it was in Discovery? You have to admit those Klingons looked new. 😁🖖🏽

[@kiwani4470]

..like DISCOVERY.. perhaps?🤔 I don't care what anyone says, I think ST: Discovery was a TERRIFIC series.. Opening in the past, it is part origin story of the Enterprise crew, & jumps forward to "Where No One Has Gone Before," & I think that was intriguing.. new sets, new people, new uniforms, new weapons & technology, chance to see how the Federation fared over the centuries & uncovering the reasons for it's near demise, then bringing it all back with the HOPE for the future.. !! How can ANY Sci-Fi fan NOT be intrigued by this, instead of an old rehash of TNG people (I liked Picard, btw & TNG was epic, but enough is enough already). Paramount (& WHOEVER) should concentrate on SNW, Section 31, LEGACY (w/ Seven as Capt & crew), movie ST: 4 (with Kirk & Spock, et al), AND BRING BACK DISCOVERY!! I don't want to know about Picard's younger days (unless it's blended into 1 episode of the Legacy series), & I CERTAINLY DON'T WANT TO KNOW ABOUT PICARD'S LOVE INTEREST.period🧐 ..that's a HORRIBLE IDEA.

[@Noplayster13]

Remember when we’d get excited when new movies were announced? Now the whole world just groans.

[@thomasgriffith2953]

Agree!!!! 👍

[@iain4295]

Yeah they are dross now. Imagine if Patrick Stewart is involved again and absolutely ruins it like he did Piccard. Just admit the franchise is over and stop ruining the legacy of the real Star Treks.

[@AMPProf]

Didn't you say that last time???

[@heleneb2105]

No, negative, irritating, "I want the 60s sets back!" people like you groan.

[@dustytrayl]

Gawd! So negative! Who cares!! NO ONE!

[@jamesneary1982]

No prequels, no sequels, please. It'll be great to have something original and it doesn't have to be all 'pew pew' and kill the bad guy troupe. Good story and characters within the Star Trek universe.

[@bjornjoseph]

That's why snw is amazing Disco is literally pewpew.

[@anjetto1]

No prequels or sequels? I only want movies that all exist only at the exact same time as each other

[@Dargonhuman]

@@anjetto1 Spinoffs with a new ship, new crew of characters and a new story that exists within the same framework would be fine. There are plenty of interesting crews from the books they could tap for new movies; The Excalibur under Captain Calhoun would make for an awesome movie series, the USS Aventine with its experimental slipstream drive would be fun, hell, we could always step away from Starfleet for a minute and get the IKS Gorkon made into a movie, or follow a crew of civilians on a trade ship as there are several of those to choose from in the books. Heck, even if we have to stay on a Starfleet ship and the books are, for whatever reason, off limits, there are still plenty of story possibilities within the Star Trek lore that don't have to be centered on TOS or TNG. The battle of Narendra III, where the Enterprise-C was lost defending a Klingon colony would be a compelling story for a movie, as would sending a diplomatic envoy to re-establish contact with the Dominion or investigating the origins of the brain bugs from TNG's Conspiracy. A time travel thriller with the Department of Temporal Investigations would be fun, especially if they tie it to the forgotten Temporal Cold War from Star Trek Enterprise. Or a spy thriller involving Section 31... Or both, a time travel spy thriller with DTI and Sec31 working against each other with no clearly defined "protagonist" or "antagonist" as each side would have equally valid and morally defensible reasons for their actions. My point is, the Star Trek universe is a vast and wide ocean of possibilities, so the last thing we need is to stay in the kiddie pool of reboots, remakes, prequels and Enterprise-centered sequels.

[@bsallows]

​@@bjornjosephAnd wah wah wah I'm crying look at me I'm Micheal

[@kellypidgeon4269]

Agreed, and it would also be helpful to figure out a way to return it to the prime universe.

[@wehoric]

Yeah, the first one is set to hit theatres in 2057.

[@Dargonhuman]

We'll make first contact with the Vulcans before seeing a new, proper Star Trek movie.

[@justachipn3039]

@@Dargonhuman 🤣🤣👍👍For real lol

[@georgethompson4912]

Instead of digging for origin stories and rehashing stuff from the past, can we just move FORWARD (boldly go 😂) and commission a new series called Riker. It seems like no brainier to me. Number 2 is as popular as Picard ever was.

[@Steve-gc5nt]

Riker isn't moving forward. Plus Frakes can't act for toffee

[@dominic.h.3363]

@@Steve-gc5nt It's part of his character's charm. Seth Rogan couldn't act to save his life, he was still in a ton of movies.

[@dominic.h.3363]

@@KikoNYC Moving forward, when it's synonymous with abandoning lore, is something that disingenuously uses the name of an established franchise for something different. I for one do not like the idea of some irrecognizable swill puppeteering Star Trek's corpse, only pretending to be it.

[@dominic.h.3363]

@@KikoNYC It's impossible NOT to make almost everyone happy, if you just stop trying to reinvent a formula that works. SNW has been the biggest effort to imitate TOS since TOS, (including the first two seasons of TNG but that argument would be too big of a tangent to explain) and you'd have to search very far and wide to find people disliking it. Disparity arises when there is disparate content within the same franchise to be for or against.

[@michaelwallace2487]

Not trying to be unkind, but how can a series about Riker be considered moving forward? The same goes for a Legacy or a Picard series as well? TPTB need to stop retreading old TREK and focus on new concepts within the STAR TREK universe itself.

[@Nodux359]

4 new movies planned - 4 new movies to be canceled. JarJarTrek is now 15 years old. In the same span of time we got 7 actualTrek-movies.

[@MaxLaingDMP]

And speaking of the Jar Jar Trek, I confess, I tried dearly to fully embrace the J.J. efforts. Yet, as the years have passed, I have found myself quite unintentionally disliking them more and more. So much so that they are running rather close to being remembered as distasteful as the last of the TNG movies (ugh - it hurts to even say such a thing)! That is not to include the most honorable "Terry Trek" effort that took place during Picard 3. If we get nothing more from that most wonderful presentation of the cast and crew, at least those seemingly final episodes can be assembled and then split in half to make 2 movies that could be said to be the REAL final expression of our beloved TNG! Whatever the outcome of "...all things promised..." (the aforementioned 4 movies)... ~ All Hail Terry Trek! ~ All Hail Terry Trek!! ~ All Hail Terry Trek!!!

[@KarlaWagnerEU]

New cast and crew... to boldly go... Seven as captain. I'm ready. And best get Sir Patrick in one more time. Nobody knows what tomorrow will bring, but I hope he lives a good long time yet.

[@crhu319]

I want the Star Trek Continues team to get greenlight to do a series in the Prime universe set any period tbey want bit playing new characters they invent. Same retro style scripts & shooting.

[@georgeplimpton9429]

If Jar Jar Abrams is NOT involved, then it MIGHT have a chance of being good.

[@charlesstafford8290]

I don't care who directs, I want the Kelvin timeline obliterated!!! I don't even like that they backed it up on Picard!

[@georgeplimpton9429]

@@charlesstafford8290 AMEN TO THAT!!!!

[@Dargonhuman]

Even if Jar Jar Abrams isn't involved, if Kurtzman and Co. are, it's still going to be as bad as anything else they've put out.

[@Ploskkky]

I hope the next Star Trek movie will have bigger explosions and bigger action scenes, because that is what Star Trek has always been about. (sarcasm)

[@sleightofmind2016]

At this point, I'm surprised someone didn't pitch 'Star Trek vs Aliens vs Predator.' Oh, and make sure multiple Enterprises get blown up! :)

[@rondevrind7655]

Please keep Michael Bay far, far away from Star Trek.

[@Ploskkky]

@@sleightofmind2016 They should blow up at least 3 planets. And then land the Enterprise on the surface of the Sun, and get a nice tan. After that they will fight some evil thing, that is more evil than the most evil Romulan, and it will fly around in a starship, with lots of pointy parts, that is as large as 3 galaxies.

[@halley4032]

Star Trek: The Terminator Retribution, Star Trek: The Thing Unbound, Star Trek: The Borg Skynet Memorandum .... 🤣 Joking aside, I'm pretty any ridiculous premise we can think up on these comments' sections, are already being serious discussed at executive level !!

[@DimitriYar]

A movie with Captain 7 of nine Commanding the NCC1701 - G would be awaysome !!!!

[@bjornjoseph]

Section 31 didnt need a movie or a series. Its vague role as ds9 executed it is perfectly.

[@lancebaylis3169]

Section 31 was fine in DS9, and overused in everything else. Next to nobody wants a movie or series focused on them.

[@nicks3935]

Section 31: DS9 did it masterfully. Enterprise was well done. Into Darkness was decent. Discovery overused it. New movie based on Section 31 beating a dead horse.

[@joey_cordova_]

I do not want a Picard movie. S3 of Picard was great. A movie would take away what that season did. I’d love to see a series with Seven and her crew. I think we could get Section 31 by the end of the year. The old TOS and TNG movies were filmed in April/May and released in December the same year. And that was when it took longer to finish a sci-fi movie. I think the prime movies went to MAX once before for a while and then they came back to Paramount +. They get more money that way. lol but I still prefer them on P+

[@mrtrek64]

A Seven movie, with her lover in the chair next to her????? NO THANK YOU. I think the franchise can do a lot better. Something like this would put the finale nail into the coffin.

[@billgwinn9600]

Frankly, I would love a big screen production w/ Pine and Quinto et al. Just develop a great story that mainly revolves around the ship and it would be most welcome to viewers. Maybe a plot that revolves around the Q continuum beginning to emerge. Or the origination of the Borg. Just thoughts.....

[@briandeschene8424]

When one is producing the movie equivalent of predigested baby food, it is easy to produce quantity since there is no quality pressure acting against the sheer volume.

[@lindaschulman1789]

Yes but even if there is a movie prequel of 2009, with pike, it’s still Kelvin, not prime, which is what SNW is. They can be completely different.

[@IamJustJ.]

SNW is not in the Kelvin universe. It can't be because Kirk's birth is in the Kelvin universe as was his relationship with his "step-father" in the first 2009 movie. And George Kirk (his brother, named after his father) was not in that. He is, however, canonically in the Prime Universe where SNW is at and THAT timeline matches with the original series (eventually his brother and his brother's family will be killed on a planet with flying parasites).

[@Luthiart]

Discovery and SNW are in the Kelvin universe. I have no idea what you're talking about.

[@MaximusRacellius]

3:15 for those who don't care about STD or section 31 and wish to skip the first 3 minutes of Section 31 intro 3:15 JJ Trek 4 begins 5:40 prequel to 2009 JJ Trek SNW Pike movie 7:30 picard season 3 follow up movie

[@get2dachoppa249]

Thank you.

[@MaximusRacellius]

@@get2dachoppa249 not an STD fan and I felt there are others out there 🫡✌️

[@johndeltuvia7892]

The Kelvinverse is Star Wars with Starfleet uniforms.

[@dlong50]

I've been waiting for a sequel to Star Trek: Beyond.

[@royborgen]

Damn! I really like the new J.J. Abrams Star Trek movies

[@DarrylRuiz-s1w]

A new Picard would be great Sesson 3 was excellent But any new movie must include Jeri Ryan

[@bsallows]

I think having a movie or series about Harry Kim would be cool ! They could include some of the Voyager cast , but not necessarily all of them. Maybe finally he gets a shot at the Captains Seat!

[@DarrylRuiz-s1w]

@@bsallows Hopefully he'll have gotten a promotion by then

[@julianbashir8277]

All those clips from Discovery I have no memory of. Lol They had the liquid terminator? Lol

[@WithmeVerissimusWhostoned]

I wonder how much is the production of these new shows and movies driven by motives of 'cash grab', and how much by a genuine desire to explore the character of humanity and encourage its betterment. \o/

[@voltinator]

How many episodes of Disc or SNW can you fondly remember? I can remember TOS and TNG episodes because there was a certain heart behind them. For some reason the current writers tossed out any semblance of science and made the shows into soap opera pap.

[@super_ficial]

"I have sworn eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man." From the bridge plaque of the USS Yamato NCC-71807. United Federation of Planets

[@ChrisCommenting]

I don't want to see a bunch of people who act like they are working at the mall, and hanging out. I want to actually see Starfleet officers with decorum and proficiency in their jobs. These are supposed to be the best of the best of the academy that get onto the flagship called Enterprise.

[@DigitalTiger74]

I am much more interested it a new series that progresses the Star Trek timeline like Next Generation progressed the timeline after the original series and movies. So like 75 years later.

[@elguapoguano]

I'd much rather have series than movies. I'd trade all the new in production movies ( and Academy) for Star Trek : Legacy. Gimme SNW, Lower Decks, and Legacy. LLAP

[@carolinemcnulty6169]

I loved JJ Abrams' reboot of the original crew. The actors were perfectly cast and it was wonderful to see the backstory and the more lively interactions between the crew. They should proceed with that timeline.

[@purrbox7514]

Agree with this. The JJ Ambrams reboots were slick, fun and I loved Chris Pines Kirk and the other actors. All the actors did a great job of reviving the original enterprise crew and played the roles perfectly.

[@Lord_Hamlet_III]

Your POTUS comment made me audibly laugh. Take this subscription, sir! 😂

[@WhatDidIMiss]

:) Thank you

[@super_ficial]

They should take advantage of William Shatner before it's too late.

[@stopgeorge]

Shatner has the good sense to stay away from Nu Trek.

[@super_ficial]

Yeah, I think you're right. But I sure would like to see him again, at least in a cameo. But I guess it like the man said, "There are a million things in this life that you can have and there are a million things that you can't have." Captain James T. Kirk - Star date unknown. @@stopgeorge

[@DarthVader-1701]

Shatner openly called the Kelvin timeline fake Star Trek along with anything else outside of the classic timeline. I've been saying that shit for years.

[@williamwinburn6378]

They tried to use him on Enterprise in a series of Mirror Universe episodes, he was very up for it but Paramount wouldn’t pay him what he was asking. Manny Coto said they were being cheap because they’d already made up their minds not to renew the show.

[@super_ficial]

Thank you. Those people in the higher-ups are alway making stupid mistakes.@@williamwinburn6378

[@THEScottCampbell]

A CGI version of the animated series with the voices of the original cast would be the most interesting by far. The Larry Niven episode could be expanded.

[@IamJustJ.]

Perhaps, though several of its crew won't be able to return as the actors and actresses in those roles have died. Scotty, Uhura, and Bones at the top of the list and they're not trivial roles. I don't think fans, or even those who aren't fans, would enjoy AI voicing those characters.

[@heleneb2105]

Here are 3 things I'd love them to do: 1) aforementioned return to Prime of David Marcus called Star Trek: Genesis 2) limited series on Eugenics Wars 3) honestly just want to see more of the 25th century, want to know what happened after Voyager so I'd actually like to see limited series or longer films spotlighting the lives of the characters we know.

[@Barot8]

I kind of call BS on this as Paramount is famous for posting "We're doing this new movie" without even negotiating with the cast. With Bad Robot, or Secret Hideout (Kurtzman) involved it'll be guaranteed to be bad. With the possible merger still in talks, none of these films will be done. It's really to juice up the stock holders. I'd rather see Paramount sell Star Trek to Netflix. Discovery/WB would treat Star Trek even worse. Zaslav can't run his own studio. Look at his ruining DC.

[@ChristopherColegrove1983]

The only one of the four... the Picard one is the only one I'm looking forward to of the ones you mentioned. And looking forward to any Legacy shows, esp bringing back DS9 (SISKO!), and VOY like PIC season 3 did for TNG. Bring back Matalas and any of the original show-runners... that would work!

[@alice_agogo]

Nope. Matalas is just good at audience pandering

[@wildbill4496]

@@alice_agogo So now giving people what they want is just pandering? So then the older trek like TNG, DS9 and Voyager were just pandering?

[@alice_agogo]

@@wildbill4496 yes. Matalas is still cringe just not as bad Goldsman or that Kurtz guy. And no DS9 and VOY were not pandering since both failed to achieve the popularity of TNG.

[@wildbill4496]

@@alice_agogoWell then by your definition Matalas was not pandering because none of new Trek, including Picard season3, came anywhere close to the popularity of TNG, DS9, Voyager or even Enterprise, in terms of total viewers.

[@alice_agogo]

@@wildbill4496 he was still pandering judging by the praise of TNG fans

[@purrbox7514]

Incredible that new movies are coming. I hope the producers don't read these dumb social media comments complaining about prequels. Every single Trekkie I've ever met wants a movie about the origins of the federation, it's nerd pr0n to us Trekkies. I cannot wait!

[@tonyg8471]

It's time for Star Trek to focus on Seven plus the existing Strange New Worlds series. Picard and Voyager characters can make cameo appearances. Seven of Nine is a gorgeous and badass brainiac. Can't let that go without giving her a major opportunity.

[@ntal5859]

She is way past her prime and she just an OLD bag hitting 60, stop simping for grandma you sound pathetic.

[@alice_agogo]

Nope. She's old

[@ryanhammond8292]

I hope we eventually see more, I actually loved watching the new star Trek movies

[@ryanhammond8292]

Doesn't matter who makes them as long as they have the same or similar cast

[@AudiophileTommy]

🎉 And if we are lucky ONE of them will make it to the big screen on 5 years !!! Also if she gets the lead role on the next film it will SURELY have to have subtitles !!!

[@RaikenXion]

I think this is all mainly to do with Paramount getting sold, it's been like how long since there's been any official news of a new star trek film being made, then news breaks that Paramount & WB Discovery in talks to merge, and suddenly we get not One, but Four New trek films announced to be in development out of nowhere!? they've announced this now to kind of sweeten whatever deal they're working on to make it look like there's actually al this "content". I bet whatever ends up happening to Paramount, most these projects won't even come to fruition, especially JJ's "star trek 4", his career has floundered since his disastrous ep9 starwars sequel and overall handling of the Disney sequel trilogy. Abrams was supposed to be working with DC on a new Superman movie and that's fell through since James Gunn is now running DC.

[@chucka.3520]

Thanks Eric. Great information.

[@normanleach5427]

Sir Eric...(kind of a nice ring to it)

[@polygonalmasonary]

The one Star Trek movie the fans want is the one least likely to be made, very sad 😢🇬🇧🌈♥️👍

[@Physics072]

Fans want to see Spock and his sister cry for 2 hours.

[@gbuddy]

4 new Star Trek films. I hope they will be better than the crappy last three.

[@bjornjoseph]

Lets move forward with legacy and 7 of 9

[@mummler]

I'm a huge Star Trek fan. I've been waiting for Star Trek 4 to come out for a long time. I hope that they all come out before I'm dead. I'm really getting tired of good movies getting pushed back for crap. Like I said I hope they're done before I'm dead.

[@Theratron]

You know.... I'm actually hoping none of these get made. No interest in Section 31 (with it probably being very violent it will do more bad than good for Trek), no interest in more Abrams/lenseflare universe stuff, the prequel to the 2009 movie would take place in the regular universe since the lenseflare universe was created *in* the 2009 film, which would indeed put it directly in the same timeline as Strange New Worlds (SNW), and whatever story they have to tell there, I would rather see SNW tell it. As for Picard, I thought season 3 of the series was the *perfect* ending for that character. I don't want them to mess with that, and I certainly don't want to see him die. So.... continue with SNW, continue with Lower Decks, do the new Legacy series, and we'll be all good.

[@JohnSmith-el6lk]

Good video. Very informative.

[@gordiebrooks]

Let’s just see how many come to fruition !! My guess is maybe 1.

[@davetomlinson9063]

I’ll believe it when I’m eating popcorn

[@bensisko-theemissary4940]

I wanted to see Star Trek Legacy move forward. Didn’t hear that at all here.

[@thejamesasher]

2:00 beware of mergers. they can create a monopoly, and as ticketmaster proved, shareholders are the only winners when monopolies happen.

[@detch01]

I was a huge star trek fan with the original series. Less so with NG, and even less with the next two. The last one aired on television was a disaster from the first two minutes of episode 1. I expect that IF these four actually get made and released they'll be even worse. So yeah, even if what you say is true I won't be paying money or even spending the time to watch more wokist sewage cloaked in Star Fleet uniforms.

[@linguist2k]

I'd be up for a Deep Space 9 movie!

[@thomasgriffith2953]

The only StarTrek movie that is of any intrest is StarTrek Beyond with the original cast with Chris Pine and Zachary Pinto!

[@barend415]

Best news ever. No more J.J. Abrams Star Trek movies!

[@Leftyotism]

WUUUT! They better are better than the last ones!!!

[@jakerocinante1133]

I have to agree with everyone who is tired of the rehashing of original concepts instead of original new stories. That’s probably why the only Star Trek I watch these days is Lower Decks because even though it often re-addresses stories from previous series it’s actually funny.

[@mark-nm4tc]

Just like buses...you wait ages for one and four arrive simultaneously😉. Still, I hope Picard movie doesn't go ahead. After the farce of Nemesis, P3 was the perfect goodbye for the TNG gang, why spoil it?.

[@IamJustJ.]

I don't think the JJ Trek 4 is going to be made at this point. It's been considered, dropped, considered, and dropped so many times, I am going to have to request they do a wellness check to make sure that baby didn't suffer permanent brain damage. Really the only 2 I see actually happening with be the Section 31 movie and the Picard one. And, of those, I'm really only wanting the Section 31 movie. I *loved* Picard Season 3. I think it is done and needs to stay that way. Legacy should be the next series in development, if I had a vote.

[@twotal21]

TREK IS BACK!

[@davetomlinson9063]

Logic dictates that all things are subject to entropy,it’s time to pass the baton,a new crew.

[@neto135791]

the pike movie sounds like a mess just from the discription. its better to make a SWN movie at this point

[@leerilea1709]

Please let Star Trek die in peace

[@davidmiddleton7958]

When JJ Ahbrams makes his fourth Star Trek film, I have a message for him. "Dim your head lights, don't DAZZLE!" How many bad mistakes were missed be ause JJ blinded everyone?

[@quantumjet253]

For me Trek is best served as a TV show. So I'm excited for more Strange New Worlds. I look forward to a show based around the new Enterprise captained by Seven. The only JJ movie I enjoyed was the last one, so I can't say I care if a further film in that series doesn't happen; and besides SNW has already set up a future Kirk/Enterprise show. The Picard movie needs to move quickly if it's to ever happen. I suppose the Section 31 movie would be interesting, but it's likely to fail. Outside of hardcore Trek fans no one will understand what it is. And with Trek fans being incredibly unethusiastic about new Trek-anything, I'm not convinced this movie will stand much chance of being anything but a one-off. Hopefully, if its any good, it returns to being a TV show, even if it loses the movie's stars in doing so. The third one no one's heard of, the 'prequel' to JJ's Kirk/Spock, etc... whatever!?

[@geekns]

I think one of the problems with the reboots with Pine & Quinto is their reliance on CGI. I'd really love another film like The Undiscovered Country where it was a very thought provoking plot that was light on the special effects but had extreme stakes. They keep focusing on really crazy end-of-everything concepts that are just a little too out there really. The crew working together is really the strength of the franchise, not shock and awe.

[@GuyHall-d6z]

First and far most the reasons Ster Trek was successful was the two main characters or shall I say three, where damn good actors that portrayed there roles at the top caliber performance. The supporting cast added depth and fans endured themselves to the characters and the fact that the environment of outer space fascinates people of end list possibilities. I hope the Trek movies carry those same qualities in the future.

[@peteberry3826]

No more Picardbot!

[@HappyHopping11]

since when do they have a flying dragon (at or near 2:40) in star trek?

[@michaelccopelandsr7120]

Speaking of movies we need.. WE NEED A "MR. FIX-IT" MOVIE! The Grey Hulk, at night, in a suit! It fits perfectly into the blip years. When attempting to fix his arm, Banner unknowingly creates the Grey Hulk. He thinks he heals and cures himself. Except, at night, he turns into JOE FIX-IT. Joe leaves Banner cryptic messages on the mirror. Have him fight The Leader, (to close the loop) while having to deal with Joe. To win, he must meld Banner, Green Hulk and Grey Hulk into the Hulk he is now. It writes itself! GIVE US "MR. FIX-IT!" Pass it on, please and thank you!

[@michaelccopelandsr7120]

It can set up another side movie, "The New Fantastic Four." The original FF are believed dead. So, Grey Hulk, Wolverine, Ghost Rider and Spider-Man fill in. It was a great storyline and it involves the skrulls. It'll fit in VERY nicely.

[@MrJaviersalcedo]

Yes Picard for President 😄😄😄

[@GravesRWFiA]

anything listed by bad robot can be disregarded, not only won't it be any good but they have tried their tactic time and again announcing films thinking it will get a ground swell of support to influence investors.

[@lftalora]

As long as J. J. Abrahams stays 10 light years away of any Star Trek (or Star Wars) productions, I may be willing to give it a try...

[@Nodux359]

Same! He has become the Destroyer of Franchises!

[@DunedinMultimedia2]

And please no more Simon Pegg

[@pike100]

​@@DunedinMultimedia2I love Simon Pegg!

[@soundcheck734]

Personally I'd love to see a Star Trek Legacy, although I'm kinda wishing the ship would have kept its destination as the Titan. As we all know, Jeri Ryan's character as Seven was dry; like Tuvoc, and unattached, that was slowly relaxing; unlike Tuvoc, her character in Picard was "more human". Voyager & Discovery were refreshing. A different ships and very little mention of 1701 any alphabet. I think it's time for more Trek minus 1701 any alphabet.

[@voltinator]

Wrath of Khan's Kirk: I feel young. Star Trek Picard's Jean Luc: I am young!

[@InimicalWit]

I'm vaguely troubled by Picard. Seasons 1 and 2 were connected, and both leading viewers to recognize prejudices that we had somehow accepted and that were bad for us, because when we think we have the excuse ... we can be so very vile to the wrong people. ... but for some reason, the fans of a show that has had a through line of seeking new life and new civilizations - even when the focus was a stationary .... station - for some reason fans don't like what's going on, but we do know we'd all love to see the TNG crew again... So Season 3 was written to give those angry fans what they wanted: a simple classic battle where the bad guy is just bad and we don't have to learn anything, but we do get to squish another bug in the universe. Didn't the Borg join the Federation at the end of Season 2? Don't worry. No one's going to bring that up. We will just have to accept that between Seasons 2 and 3, something messed with the timeline. *shrug So... a movie for Picard? Where will they dare go now...

[@crhu319]

Actually season 2 is way more emotional and thoughtful than 3. it wraps Guinan, Q, Both and both of the new characters from Season 1. It advanced Picard, Raffi, Seven all as people and gave us a brief look at a particularly scary mirror Picard. C'mon. That's a lot. And I loved season 3 and saw it first. Season 2 is better.

[@InimicalWit]

​@@crhu319 Pardon, it seems you think you're disagreeing with me, but I concur: Season 3 was a step down. We set down a bunch of characters we had been working on through the first 2 seasons and ... I thought Season 2 was great, except for an apparent lack of recognition of the episodes from Season 5&6 of TNG, and the tension was broken a bit too quickly when Picard was returned to the bridge and, as mentioned, the Borg ... joined the Federation? Right? (This is the part that I'm also saying is so bad with Season 3: Why are the Borg suddenly not in the Federation? I thought the Borg joined the Federation at the end of Season 2...)

[@AlexanderVonish]

⁠@@InimicalWitNot exactly the borg collective itself but only the Jurati variant of the borg, which is a separate entity from the collective, I believe someone had covered a video of all the separate borg entities such as the cooperative, and another video covering the theoretical practicality of the borg joining the federation (Some of the comments also gave their own insights of the other borgs and their own chances of joining), and it can be deduced that the borg seen joining the federation was in fact, NOT the collective. While it was a bit odd that the Jurati rendered no assistance, it may be written off as “potentially hazardous” based on (My personal) theory that the collective borg queen can simply modify the signal used to infect young Starfleet crew members, or generate a new type of signal, to hijack non-collective borg members.

[@theshadow100]

If they are showing it on paramount plus,most people don’t have it …..just beam me up when the movie comes out,I be in my ready room

[@vitom5513]

Strange New Worlds is about 10 years previous to TOS, not decades. This new "origins" could be the Romulan War and Federation founding.

[@sashas6629]

Love this info

[@KJ7JHN]

Section 31 needs to happen. And a send off for Picard is completion. JJ Abrams without Chris will not go well unless they can find a Kirk more confident and blonde than Pine. I think Pine kinda sunk that one. Im still waiting for Bourne 6 where Bourne becomes director. Strange New Worlds does need a Movie. With TNG's cliff hangers they technically have like 12. Same with Voyager. SNW, although a bit farsicle needs a Movie. I hope Section 31 involves Burnham and Co.

[@linguist2k]

I'm with you on a Bourne 6, though I'm not sure I want to see him advancing all the way to director. But I'd definitely like to see Bourne take total revenge on the agency miscreants. And I'd love it if we find out that Nikki Parsons DIDN'T die after all, so Julia Stiles can reprise her role!

[@antonnym214]

I'm a purist. Over a period of four years, I tracked down people who worked on the original show and I wrote a book about The Original Series. Star Trek needs the Roddenberry ethos and Roddenberry vision, because without it, what you have is a J.J. Abrams shoot 'em up in outer space. It can certainly be well-crafted, but for me, it's not Trek. None of the new shows are Trek and none of the new films are Trek. If they can't even get a trek disciple like Rick Berman, Michael Piller, or even Gene Junior, then the best they can hope for is to draw attention to the Original Series or The Next Generation. People need to go back to TOS and witness the big bang of the Trek universe. period. Thank you.

[@purrbox7514]

Wasn't TOS a beat em up? The fight scenes were ridiculous. I've always thought Star Trek movies needed more action and Abrams has delivered that. Star Trek is allowed to have action scenes, DS9 and ENT both had long story arcs covering interstellar wars.

[@CatharinaKoenheim]

Believe it when it happens.

[@dman38]

I absolutely don't care about Section 31.

[@jonbradley4789]

Thank you

[@curtrogers5873]

Great work you do hard work and it’s very appreciated thank you so much thanks for the fun and info until next time

[@kborak]

This is a bot

[@TheFiown]

Oh my god, let me get a seat and a whisky.

[@macallen2009]

Star Trek does better on television than in theaters.

[@martinriley106]

If they open the films up to buying they’ll make their money. Don’t restrict them to streaming services all the time.

[@paulkovacs2875]

What is going on with the new star track next generation????

[@j.tshark3313]

The biggest problem with the Star Trek movie with Quinto and others is the fact NONE are signed. They all signed 7 year deals and they expired while ago. The original plan was for 4 movies in 7 years. That obviously went sideways

[@DanielMartinez-lz3ot]

lets go back to the prime timeline. lets do something like Axanar, stories before Kirk and after Enterprise. Also, stepping away from the s.j.w. b.s. would be really great. I would love to see a human female captain who is smart and strong, but at 120 pounds, realizes she can't really give a beating like a man, so she relies on her wits, her crew, and her phaser set to kill, to solve her physical attacks. A captain real enough that my daughters would think, "I would love to be like that." And not roll their eyes at some silly superhuman female who can last 200 rounds in the ring with David Bautista.

[@dominic.h.3363]

Can't believe I'm saying this but I don't want them. They dilute the franchise too much. SNW was a home run, but let's not pretend that it wasn't just dumb luck that it was.

[@mrtrek64]

Are you confusing series? SNW is horrible!! The entire cast with the exception of Spock, Number 1, and the Andorian are nothing short of awful and completely unlikable. And the actor who plays Pike? They should have just went ahead and changed the character of Pike to a woman.

[@dominic.h.3363]

@@mrtrek64 SNW has a Metacritic user score of 7.7. Picard and Discovery both have 4.3... that makes you the vocal minority disliking the series.

[@IamJustJ.]

@@mrtrek64Eh.. actually, literally everyone I've introduced SNW to says it's awesome. Which, as someone points out in this thread, matches metacritic and the reviews. So... what were you saying again?

[@bluenerd8297]

Will they recast Chekov?

[@37434mh]

I didn’t know there were any “Star Trek Legacy” fans. It is a concept not a series. It might eventually be a series but I bet it wouldn’t be that great. I don’t know- maybe it would be.

[@spockmcoyissmart961]

They can't get the 'next' film made. Saying 4 is laughable.

[@mrfeenix1]

They would do well to keep the Pike characters from SNW they are a great bunch and work well together . Better to not muddy the waters anymore than they have already

[@SwellSteven]

Maybe the 2009 prequel is actually a snw movie

[@stangundam01]

seriously enough of section 31 & no to a picard film another prequel movie could work as long as they use all the actors of enterprise & give full thought & respect to the story & characters & a 4th jj film could work but lots of thought for story & characters

[@ChrisRoth1972]

I wonder why Paramount keeps doing prequels.I don’t think there will be a sequel to Star Trek Beyond which is fine with me,I would love to see Star Trek Legacy,I would love to see another Star Trek Next Generation movie which unfortunately the final one & hopefully in the Theaters.