Рет қаралды 190
An argument: how much information determines Free Will or no choice.
arxiv.org/pdf/...
1) If you have no information == You have no real choices. You do have guesses and you can learn from those, but they aren't yet choices. Hence, it is Super determinism to anyone who knew your actions, or it is Free Will to any hopeful parent that doesn't yet know that humans have to learn how to make stupid choices.
2) If you have **some information** == Here, choice means you know what consequences your actions have, to **some** degree. + It means you have **some** idea of an event on the horizon that you will actually be able to make a decision on. Both are required. Hence **FREE WILL**
or
3) If you are a god and know everything or are a scientist and have set an experiment in which all variables are known or contained in a set (with the set being contained and never revealed) and are repeatable then the outcome is repeatable and the outcome is determined. Hence Super determinism.
I had this same argument with a preacher when I was 5. I lost the argument then, I would lose the argument now, and hence, the stupidity of the argument.