Amazing lecture, Thank you so much Mr. S. Nagamuthu sir.
@rajarammohanroy69422 жыл бұрын
Law of Evidence in criminal law,what a presentation with examples.we are indebted to you sir 👍
@aturkimi86263 жыл бұрын
It is our previlage to be able to learn from such eminent jurists.
@gramodayshiksha53873 жыл бұрын
Very nice sir
@sobhanaamma2513 жыл бұрын
The lectures are most advanced and applied logic in interpretation of evidence law. Wonderful revelation of evidence law.
@mansikasana43194 жыл бұрын
Honourable Justice gives an insightful explanation always
@dr.kantarajtavaneadvocate19064 жыл бұрын
Senior Advocate and Justice Nagamuthu is a rear diamond as his name suggests.
@subramanyammn47433 жыл бұрын
Thank you Sir. This lecture should be heard to students who appear exams on Evidence Act. Great presentation by Ld. Judge.
@josepi97624 жыл бұрын
He is a man down to earth. His classes are very good & lucid.
@rdikas4234 Жыл бұрын
Great experience Sir
@leninvinober64884 жыл бұрын
Wonderful presentation, helps to understand the concepts easily.
@bhaskarnaidu90973 жыл бұрын
Truly informative and what a clarity of explanation .Great by his Lordship Justice S.Nagamuthu Sir
@dineshlabde18012 жыл бұрын
Great great & simply great....lovely argument by res sir in resent UP child murder & rape case ,...SC aqueted the accuse.....great argument ........
@indikarupasinghe66192 жыл бұрын
very good lecture. very useful, thank you Sir and Friday group.
@TheAdvajaykhaire Жыл бұрын
Grateful Sir
@isroylex5 жыл бұрын
You are such great humanist having interest tech young advocates in India and I am one of them thank you . In fact I prepared a notes on your speech
@prakashkaramchandani70634 жыл бұрын
Thanks Sir, it's so beautifully and elaborately explained , it cleared so many doubts of evidence act
@shree96472 жыл бұрын
Sir is always Cristal clear
@adityatripathy88682 жыл бұрын
So well explained with lots of patience.!👍👍👍
@cookwithrakhi40203 жыл бұрын
its wonderful 👏👏👏👏👏
@rajeevkumarnegi70844 жыл бұрын
Genius sir.Thanks lots ji.Jai🇮🇳Hind.
@shekhartalashilkar70633 жыл бұрын
Easy presentation of complicated subject. Thank you very much.
@sudhakarpula43532 жыл бұрын
Thank you, sir
@balarampandit51583 жыл бұрын
Truely brilliant on Evidence Act
@SaddamHusain-sk6my3 жыл бұрын
Wow explained in lucid Manner....👍👍
@yogasreealladi91192 жыл бұрын
Excellent lecture
@venkatathirisrinivasan68163 жыл бұрын
Great lecture. Excellent Sir. Its very useful for individual Advocates without practice under the senior like me.
@anujkkkkk4 жыл бұрын
Great lecture... Most useful
@mukhtaradv22214 жыл бұрын
Exceptional sir
@AbdulMajeed-px9zj5 жыл бұрын
Sir This video is very useful to every citizen thanks a lot
@UdayKumar-zm9rp3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for addressing on judicial evidence
@Vijay-bv3vd4 жыл бұрын
Spiffing, your lecture is, my lord. Very useful
@mk.justahuman84394 жыл бұрын
Thank you! Great insight
@verasenaverasena56392 жыл бұрын
Nice
@mukhtaradv22213 жыл бұрын
Brilliant
@advocaterambabu4 жыл бұрын
Superb sir....thank u very much
@sanvisingh99644 жыл бұрын
Best lecture on evidence act
@commonerIndian5 жыл бұрын
Brilliant!!
@abyabraham96554 жыл бұрын
Excellent
@gvthiruppathilawoffice88454 жыл бұрын
Thank u Mr. Hon’ble Justice I watched ur superb lecture in the evidence Act,
@vijayakumarpoovar88904 жыл бұрын
There cannot be any presumption when courts accept the evidence of eye witnesses.
@commonerIndian4 жыл бұрын
Super
@farooqshah69604 жыл бұрын
More and more lectures plz
@mitanshgupta13984 жыл бұрын
thanks a lot
@MVS8624 жыл бұрын
Excellent session sir
@neon32293 жыл бұрын
Very nice sir from odisha
@Pradeepkumar-jj4vg4 жыл бұрын
Wonderful
@dr.dasharathwalekaradvocat44744 жыл бұрын
I have no words to appreciate Justice(Retd) S Nagamuthu I would like to meet if possible
@surajitdutta12013 жыл бұрын
Respected sir kindly make classes on criminal trial in cases in connection with warranty complaints and summary as well as with adduce evidence sections🙏
@ShekharKumar_965 жыл бұрын
Much awaited clip. Thanks a ton, sir.
@AdvShams4 жыл бұрын
My favourite
@oooo-kz6er Жыл бұрын
I am proud to say i am from his native place
@kiranrawat24874 жыл бұрын
Very useful.The person coughing throughout the video is distrubing the entire session.😓
@muthumaniveeramuthu2381 Жыл бұрын
Iyya vanakam one of my told about you i hardly trying to see u in supremcourt but i couldn't .
@muthumaniveeramuthu2381 Жыл бұрын
one of my friend told about you iyya
@muthumaniveeramuthu2381 Жыл бұрын
Always downtrodden peoplesuffered by dramatic and false evidence it may be domination of highercommunity to the lowercommunity
@josepi97624 жыл бұрын
7.35-36.Is it u/s162 of Crpc, sir.
@babu.mmanickam27123 жыл бұрын
Nice presentation, but failed to mention whether the section 133 prevails over the section 114(b) or not
@prabakhart61085 жыл бұрын
Someone was coughing in front of Mike which makes disturbance to hear the rule of law.
@wilsonrobithankayyan15474 жыл бұрын
1
@powerfulshetkari89493 жыл бұрын
Please keep lecture on cross examination
@No.its_swaaan2 жыл бұрын
"Proved." A fact is said to be proved when, after considering the matters before it, the Court either believes it to exist, or considers its existence so probable that a prudent man ought, under the circumstances of the particular case, to act upon the supposition that it exists.
@devidast1123 Жыл бұрын
What is the import and impact of S 57(1) of the Indian Evidence Act?
@subramaniansukumarapillai3874 жыл бұрын
🙏🙏🙏
@ganesh2701923 жыл бұрын
Sir
@sobhanaamma2513 жыл бұрын
Cough is a disturbance.
@sanjeevsirohi8056 Жыл бұрын
Please organise a lecture on why Uttar Pradesh which tops the State list in having maximum number of pending cases has just one Bench and that too so near to Allahabad and nowhere else and why the litigants of West UP of 30 districts have been attached with Allahabad and not with Lucknow where there is a Bench which was just not needed as it is so close to Allahabad and nowhere else due to which the litigants of West UP have to travel whole night and half day all the way to Allahabad to seek justice and this despite the irrefutable fact that it is West UP which owes for more than half of the total number of pending cases of UP and for which Justice Jaswant Singh Commission headed by former Supreme Court Judge Justice Jaswant Singh recommended three HC Benches and yet not one created and for Maharashtra which is the home state of incumbent CJI Dr Dhananjay Yashwant Chandrachud and which already had multiple HC Benches was given one more at Aurangabad in 1985 but not a single for West UP or even for whole of Uttar Pradesh as recommended? Why lawless Bihar which is the home state of incumbent President of Supreme Court Bar Association Mr Vikas Singh has not even a single HC Bench? Kindly explain! My very best wishes and best regards, Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate
@reyansh46403 жыл бұрын
Case डिसीजन-- We the juveniles after admonishing them. There shall be no disqualification of the juvenile and records concerning to this case shall be removed that the concerned authority as per section 19 of the juvenile Justice act 2000. File be consigned to the record room after due compliance. पुलिस वेरिफिकेशन में सरकारी नौकरी में दिक्कत आएगी सर