From the Beginning to Now | Lawrence Krauss | EP 182

This episode was recorded on May 7th 2021
On this episode of the Jordan Peterson Podcast, Jordan is accompanied by American-Canadian theoretical physicist and cosmologist Lawrence M. Krauss. Throughout his career, Dr. Krauss has made remarkable contributions to the field of research on particle physics and cosmology. Dr. Krauss formerly worked at Yale University, Case Western Reserve University, and Arizona State University. Dr. Krauss also founded ASU’s Origins Project, a non-profit corporation that holds public panel discussions on science, culture, and social issues. Some of his work includes popular books such as The Physics of Star Trek and A Universe from Nothing.
Jordan and Lawrence sit down to discuss a variety of topics in the mind-boggling world of quantum physics. They spend time discussing generated models of the beginning of our universe, the lawbreaking complexities of quantum physics, the ramifications related to entropy, the usefulness of the scientific method, as well as the instinctive behaviour for religious compulsion among human beings.
The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast can be found at
www.jordanbpeterson.com/podcast/
More information on Lawrence M. Krauss can be found on his website and Twitter linked below:
www.lawrencemkrauss.com/
/ lkrauss1
__________________
[00:00] Introduction.
[2:00] Jordan kicks things off by positing a description of entropy for discussion relating to complexity in systems of matter, time, and energy.
[13:00] Krauss expounds on the value of overcoming failure.
[16:00] Peterson prompts Krauss to expand on times in his career where the redirection of an experiment led to incredible discovery that was not related to his original intention or hypothesis.
[21:30] The science of cosmology, taking the listeners back to the beginning of our universe through theoretical models.
[27:00] The size of the universe, is it a reasonable question to ask?
[41:00] Exploring the concept of time relative to change, space, and matter.
[44:30] Talking about the creation of the universe looking at matter versus antimatter distribution.
[56:00] The current picture (based on models of the matter and antimatter at the beginning of the universe).
[1:01:00] The ability of the laws of physics to fluctuate at different energy levels (scale, size). The formation of all the foundational elements in existence.
[1:10:00] Quantum fluctuation, quantum mechanics, quantum ground state, the resonant wavelength of electrons, and much more.
[1:20:30] Lawrence Krauss gives his summarization of the interpretation of quantum mechanics and complexity.
[1:25:30] Debating meaning, truth, reality, and reason in the universe. The complex and strained relationship between the scientific method and religious instinct towards our existence.
[1:43:00] Jordan asks Lawrence to comment on the religious instinct removed by modern atheists popping up again in a politicalized form of secular humanism.
#Physics #Religion #LawrenceKrauss
Jordan B Peterson is a professor of psychology at the University of Toronto, a clinical psychologist, and the author of the multi-million copy bestseller 12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos, #1 for nonfiction in 2018 in the US, Canada, the UK, Australia, New Zealand, Sweden, the Netherlands, Brazil and Norway, and slated for translation into 50 languages.
Dr. Peterson has appeared on many popular podcasts and shows, including the Joe Rogan Experience (877, 958, 1006), The Rubin Report, H3H3 (#37), and many more. Dr. Peterson’s own podcast has focused mainly on his lecture series, covering a great deal of psychology and historical content.
// SUPPORT THIS CHANNEL //
Newsletter: linktr.ee/DrJordanBPeterson
Donations: www.jordanbpeterson.com/donate
// COURSES //
Discovering Personality: jordanbpeterson.com/personality
Self Authoring Suite: selfauthoring.com/
Understand Myself (personality test): understandmyself.com/
// BOOKS //
Beyond Order: 12 More Rules for Life: jordanbpeterson.com/Beyond-Order
12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos: jordanbpeterson.com/12-rules-...
Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief: jordanbpeterson.com/maps-of-m...
// LINKS //
Website: jordanbpeterson.com/
Events: jordanbpeterson.com/events/
Blog: jordanbpeterson.com/blog/
Podcast: jordanbpeterson.com/podcast/
Reading List: jordanbpeterson.com/great-books/
Merchandise: teespring.com/stores/jordanbp...
// SOCIAL //
Twitter: / jordanbpeterson
Instagram: / jordan.b.peterson
Facebook: / drjordanpeterson
// SPONSORS //
For Advertising Inquiries, visit www.advertisecast.com/TheJord...

[@locutus2962]

I'm a welder, and I listen to JP's podcasts pretty much all day while I weld. It makes me enjoy my job like 5x more than usual. It's like getting a college education while I make money.

[@abudrda]

Totally agree 👍 we shouldn't stop educate ourselves till we die.

[@r.g.1166]

I'm trying to get my son into welding. If you have a little time someday I would like ask you some questions. Peace!

[@devlincummingspas1682]

I’m an electrician. I do the same thing. Hahaha

[@GoodOrion2113]

Lol same here in Cosmetic Inspection

[@erichschinzel6486]

Funny you say that, feel the same

[@chrissimpson7634]

"Education shouldn't be based on answers, it should be based on questions." - Lawrence Krauss Very well said!

[@redmed10]

So you're saying students should be in control.

[@BP7BlackPearl]

@@redmed10 He is saying the teacher should instill in the kids the desire to ask more questions.

[@redmed10]

@@BP7BlackPearl I know exactly what he is saying. But he shows no appreciation whatsoever of the practicalities of teaching 30 kids in a class and having to teach to a curriculum It takes a special kind of teacher who can actually do what krauss is advocating. These type of communicators can make much more money outside the teaching profession and with none of the headaches of teaching. The type of teaching krauss advocates would cost double if not treble what is generally provided in public school system today. It could be done but would require higher taxes which people are against. I'm just asking krauss to live in the real world on this subject. If he's talking about higher education system fair enough. But I don't think he is.

[@BP7BlackPearl]

@@redmed10 I have no idea how u come up with that conclusion. Why would it cost more? We already have some teachers who do that and they don't get paid more. Many teachers are just lazy, or get that way. A good teacher is interested in their students as well as the topic. Good teachers voluntarily work overtime without pay cuz they enjoy it.

[@redmed10]

@@BP7BlackPearl Go on a few teachers forums or Facebook groups and see what they say. Why do people out their kids in private schools. Smaller classes. More one to one tuition. Less stressed teachers. And that all costs a lot of money. Surely you know how expensive that can be. Parents pay this because they know the advantages of these things. I hear of teachers paying for school supplies in public schools out of their own pocket. Of course some teachers give their own time for the kids who need a bit extra help. But if more money was spent and more teachers were employed , individual wouldn't have to do it out of the goodness of their hearts. Would you do extra hours of work for no extra pay? Why do you presume teachers should be expected to do it just because they are in teaching profession?

[@CaptainBlaine]

Lawrence Krauss is one of my favorite educators because he (usually lol) looks like he enjoys it. Some very intelligent people get frustrated or annoyed with JP’s questions but I think to a certain extent JP is asking because he wants to learn. And Lawrence is happy to indulge and share his knowledge. Love it.

[@jimdoolin5480]

9 7. L m hy u7uu0

[@jacobmarshall5391]

​@@jimdoolin5480 Hmm...very interesting indeed.

[@oliviajames8630]

I am currently reading "1001 Atheist & Agnostic Quotes and Proverbs to Live By" Lawrence M. Krauss. And is AMAZING !!! BLEW MY MIND !!!

[@stephendesjardins3626]

I am so moved by Mr. Peterson's raging determined refusal to allow the dying of the light. Rage on, sir. Rage on.

[@RussianBot4Christ]

Rage like a toddler running into a semi truck.

[@MarkJones-gt2qd]

One of my favourite poems. Also D Thomas best work. I'm old and half welsh, so we did all that in school, but I'm guessing not everyone knows what you are referencing. Perfect for Peterson! Do not go gentle into that good night, Old age should burn and rave at close of day; Rage, rage against the dying of the light. Though wise men at their end know dark is right, Because their words had forked no lightning they Do not go gentle into that good night. Good men, the last wave by, crying how bright Their frail deeds might have danced in a green bay, Rage, rage against the dying of the light. Wild men who caught and sang the sun in flight, And learn, too late, they grieved it on its way, Do not go gentle into that good night. Grave men, near death, who see with blinding sight Blind eyes could blaze like meteors and be gay, Rage, rage against the dying of the light . And you, my father, there on the sad height, Curse, bless, me now with your fierce tears, I pray. Do not go gentle into that good night. Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

[@Io-Io-Io]

We all must do that. I do

[@IrregularPineapples]

@@MarkJones-gt2qd it became very famous after the movie "Interstellar", most people know of the poem thanks to it by now.

[@hellalpha]

@@IrregularPineapples On the soundtrack you have the whole cast reading out the poem.

[@nik4546]

These kind of discussions are desperatly needed these days.

[@dharmabeachbum]

They’re desperate for sure:)

[@TheProdigalMeowMeowMeowReturns]

Rob Koons vs Graham Oppy on Schmid’s channel.

[@XeL__]

yea and deforestation monocrop polution of air and water, mass breeding 70 billion animals per year in horrible condition. alot of discussion and action has to be done these days. but we mostly focus on what we care or like. or affect us directly. sounds like we are too much and want too much too. but intelectualy yea. this is amazing and its intriguing how far or deep we can understand the world

[@danteinferno175]

Even though it was 2 hours, it was one of those rare talks that I could have listened even longer.

[@paigemccormick6519]

Lawrence Krauss is so delightful!!

[@gamEnjoyLP]

Physic’s and psychology, two of the most fascinating topics! Really gives you a sense of the complexity and beauty of life.

[@philipslimko4627]

Physics definitely

[@Saral_Lekhi]

If u combine the words it makes Psychic 😋

[@robertokeefe5944]

Reason is the slave of passion.

[@aleksybalazinski]

One of my favorite conversations I've ever listened to so far. It wasn't merely an exchange of ideas but rather a pursuit of truth, and you don't find this in the public discourse very often.

[@hellomate639]

I started getting a little annoyed with Krauss at the end because he kind of just did the annoying thing of getting too allergic to religion to develop an openness enough to discuss it in an abstract sense, without even crossing the threshold to entertain it in a sense that doesn't actually make any metaphysical claims. I worry that such an attitude will hinder the next discussion from being as interesting as possible. I also suspect that attitude is primarily what causes rationalists to persist in their harsh views on religion.

[@danteinferno175]

Peterson and his guest were on a roll in this podcast. They have great synergy. Looking forward to Peterson in the "hot seat" on Krauss' podcast!

[@lazygam3r183]

@@hellomate639 In the beginning after I became an atheist, I too had a strong disregard and contempt for religion. That has definitely changed with time and I now no longer care whether people are religious or not and view religion as key part of our history as a species.

[@Dunted]

@@hellomate639 I think Krauss was suspicious of Peterson attempting to learn as much about theoretical physics as possible, just to learn its ultimate limitations so he could 'smuggle in Jesus' to fill the gaps. Supernatural shenanigans indeed!

[@hellomate639]

@@Dunted I think that's a projection that is rather insulting to Dr. Krauss's intelligence.

[@Lakoda26]

"How to fail effectively" Has me up out of my chair. So darn important.

[@clemsonalum98]

What’s fail? I always get a ribbon.

[@bitcoinbelle]

I am almost at "must" wear reading glasses so read "fall" and thought "That's one way."

[@hollismallory2757]

Hell yeah

[@HolographicSweater]

I think learning a martial art, or surfboarding is a good way to build this skill!

[@joev.8543]

More than half of proficiency in many activities, such as skateboarding for example, are about learning how to fall skillfully.

[@rictormantas]

I hope that these two brilliant minds come together more. This is one of the best learning experiences I’ve ever had

[@jupitermoongauge4055]

Krause is certainly intelligent. Peterson is just a fascist con artist

[@camrobinson118]

As an atheist I have been troubled by Krauss' sometimes shrill rhetoric and out of hand dismissal of the value of religion, and equally, I have been perplexed by Peterson's confidence in the merit of religion's 'metaphorical substrate.' Their discussion, particularly at the end of the podcast, went a long way towards assuaging my concerns regarding their respective positions; particularly their dialectic has for me, put a more humane face on Lawrence Krauss' world view and given me a greater insight as to Jordan Peterson's somewhat vague endorsement of religion. For me, this conversation has elevated both their individual views of science and religion, and my esteem for their intellectual honesty.

[@missnellaful]

Very astute observervation. You pointed out a fascinating part that many may not pick up, thank you!

[@thearbivs]

I haven’t seen Jordan Peterson this excited in a while!! Love this conversation

[@Igor_lvanov]

I think, he was excited like a child with John Vervaeke

[@thomasjones9559]

I think Nicole Arbour got him pretty excited 😝

[@unzarjones]

Krauss looked happy to talk to someone not in his field who could understand what he was saying.

[@jamesx2464]

@@thomasjones9559 or he's trying to show his wife that he's just excited for new guests as he was 4 Nicole LOL

[@MrHEDGEFR0G]

B

[@odinsclone3436]

I spent 4 years with a girl very similar to this,,.we have a kid together and it took me 4 years before I saw the reflection in the smoke and mirrors. I thank God everyday for delivering me from that monstrous woman. I ended up finding the strength and insight to get my daughter and go by listening to your videos here on KZbin and I consume and scrap of information you provide. I've since read two books by you. One them being 1 2 rules to life. I have implemented as much new positive direction into my life and have decided to shoulder as much responsibility I'm capable shouldering alone without loosing mysql'f. And it has impacted my life in so many positive ways. I think back those darkest times. and it's a truly humbling and beautiful time. because from where I'm sitting now all I can see is a chapter in my life necessary to grow my character and my soul into what I now know as my best life. And the best part is my best life gets better every day in some incremental way weather small or large it improves because I don't lay down and go to sleep without improving at least one thing every day in order to make tomorrow and shade better than today. Thank you jordan peterson . I grew up with a single mom addicted to drugs and alcohol I never met my father and it took me until I was 30 years of age before a friend suggested I check you out .and that day at that exact moment you spoke to me in a way nothing or anyone had ever spoke to me before. It truly changed my life just like that. And it was the best most empowering day of my life. There has been some rough times during my evolution no doubt. But I appreciated every moment all the same. I embraced that struggle. I try to be happy to have even been granted the opertunity, and provided with the knowledge, and perseverance to push through those hard times and not only push through them but to grow from them. And learn from them. It's truly remarkable what a simple change in the way you see yourself and interpret your turmoil can and will make in your life just simply by saying no. I refuse to lay down and just accept this . This will not be what I was capable of. This is not my best effort. You changed my life. the first video I watched of yours captivated me and I began consuming anything I could find with your name on it. And implementing it as best I could and it completely changed how I live day to day. How I take each hardship. How i face my deepest fears. I learned how to be a man. And more importantly how control the monster within. How to call on it when I need to be heard. And how to speak with purpose and conviction . Thank you I'm sorry I wrote you a novel but I remember hearing an interview you did and you said when you need to hear positivity that you often turn to comments on your videos. Maybe you will read this . Or better maybe it helps somone else to take the reins in there own life and start making life an opertunity rather than it being there prison like I spent the first 30 years of my life.

[@Gennys]

What a DELIGHTFUL conversation Jordan and Lawrence had. I can't wait for more conversations on this level from both.

[@em1483]

I need to watch this about 5x; sooo much incredible discussion/info here. Impossible to absorb in one listen! Love the energy here; one of my favorite JP podcasts so far!

[@simonnevanpaesschen8335]

I admire Jordan Peterson more and more with every podcast . If politicians would be able to debate in such a way , life would be so much better anywhere in the world. I will need to listen a few more times to really grasp it, but what a great source of knowledge and wisdom in these 2 minds . I'm in awe .

[@groundedtruth1358]

That's because you're watching people embody the archetype and it strikes you as admirable. You know from somewhere that acting like that towards each other, and if more people did that, is our best bet in not only surviving but in making the time that we have here in our "quantum bubble of experience," good and aiming at better. Why does that manifest as meaningful to you? that's a deep question - so much fun!

[@handyjordan464]

"Tell Me What You Think About This." Or "Correct Me If I'm Wrong." These show Jordan Peterson's humility and openness to criticisms or refinement of ideas. These are some of his great strengths because they are constructive approaches. They should be printed on T-SHIRT.

[@pretol1]

These are all defense mechanisms of a person subconsciously understands that he shouldn't be talking to Krauss, because all he has to contribute to the discussion is "put your pants on in the morning"

[@jimmytimmy3680]

Anyone can say that. He starts with those ideas in mind but when Krauss or Harris asks Peterson a specific rational question, Peterson doesn't accept ir or attempt to understand it. Specifically, regarding Peterson's need to rationalize fiction and fairy tales of religions, in order to prove its worth in the 21st century, which is miceoscopic, to be fair, close to 0. That is stubborness and not humility.

[@Lulubelle.III.]

These are great things to say throughout a conversation where you shut the hell up and let the other person speak.

[@cannon7135]

@@pretol1 or you just live in a different reality..... you have problems

[@marcinspace]

@@jimmytimmy3680 lol they all dodge each other, have you even been paying attention to their conversations? It is a battle to come to a further understanding of the topic especially when two professionals in different fields are teaching one another different perspectives.

[@greasybean0843]

Two of my favorite fields coming together to make life make more sense. Thank you Jordan for all you do for people all around the world. You truly are an inspiration!

[@argyriosvlastos321]

Listened to this again, and gained so much more the second time around. A study of physics and a basic understanding of these concepts should be central to all of us, even those not technically trained!

[@daviddeida]

Why?

[@johnirvine9942]

@@daviddeida It allows you to perceive things in a manner that is not entirely subjective. Once understanding these concepts you can conceive the world in such a way that is far greater than your individual existence.

[@lowellneese549]

Big bang is not real

[@johnirvine9942]

@@lowellneese549 How do you know?

[@sherryjohnson3804]

I have to admit this one Was a little too much to grasp

[@chubzero7342]

JP is back baby! So good to see him recovering!!

[@titusabrasaxsux]

What happened to him?

[@RhodieRowley]

I love hearing Jordan speak. I mostly have no idea what he is saying, but I can listen to it all day.

[@NoUsernamae]

That's pretty much most of his fanbase. None of you have any idea what he's saying or if it's correct or incredibly wrong.

[@scratchpenny]

@@NoUsernamae I think that's true of any public figure with a large fanbase. There is always the cult of personality with popular public figures. That doesn't mean those figures don't provide some value, however. People can come away with what they find useful, as has always been done in mass communication. Unfortunately, not everyone is capable of being an intellectual. Nor do they have the time.

[@NoUsernamae]

@@scratchpenny it's debatable. Any public figure that has a following like this provides very little value. People turn them into a projected ideal, get attached to that image, and spend much of their time being emotionally moved whenever they see something for or against what that person has said. Psychologically, having an image to follow is catastrophic because it is an impediment to self knowledge. But of course I'm also no longer just talking about Peterson, like you said, it happens with all, more so with Peterson because anger resonates with people an insane amount in the current times, because we are outwardly civilised, and inwardly a mess, I don't want to go into the details of that but it's a topic that must be explored. These people seem to be helping. But in most cases. They aren't. They're just a placeholder for the collective unconscious to project itself.

[@NoUsernamae]

@We're living in a paradox. I do. I listened to him for quite a while, not because "I loved hearing him talk", but because I wanted to understand his ideas as well as possible since I thought they were very useful, unfortunately or fortunately I found out that wasn't the case. And then I realised most people don't even bother understanding the ideas he tries to spread.

[@theflu6734]

Hahaha yeah seriously, but somehow I always know what he's getting at

[@darthwrath4236]

Lawrence Krauss and Brian Greene are the best theoretical physicist I've ever listened to as a layman who never even took 1 minute of physics class. They let you speak and complete your sentences before correcting you. Genuinely interested to know your questions. Never treat you like an idiot. Which is why I'll always listen to any videos of em. Just found this one, about 57 minutes in and it felt like 5 minutes. You have no idea how hard it is for me to spend more than 10 minutes on a video that's not related with comedy/satire. My ADD seems to just vanish when I listen to Lawrence, Brian, Dawkins and sometimes even Jordan. Thank you for this Jordan. Thank you for making it free as well.

[@jbauman1111]

This is beautiful, in multiple ways. Thank you Dr. Krauss and Dr. Peterson.

[@skateebee]

I don't think I've ever seen Jordan so excited to speak with someone! Also kudos to him for stepping way outside of his comfort zone!

[@bendavis2234]

He appears so much healthier than in some of his earlier podcasts, emotionally and physically. I hope the continuation of these podcasts serves as something that’s therapeutic to him and aids Dr. Peterson in his recovery!

[@cristohv]

This comment has been repeated in almost every podcast he does lmao

[@emajinitllc3831]

you must never really watched Jordan then

[@Comicus8102]

You can tell Krauss was impressed with Jordan’s ability to stay with him on some very technical aspects of physics. Jordan didn’t merely skim Krauss’s book, he actually understood it deeply.

[@VanHalensApprentice]

I mean he was tested to have an iq of 150. No surprise there. His mental acuity, especially at the age that he’s at and the drastic recovery he just had to undertake, never ceases to flabbergast me.

[@danielm5161]

Max Tegmark would be a great person in dialog with Jordan.

[@_BirdOfGoodOmen]

@@phasespace4700 cool

[@VanHalensApprentice]

@@phasespace4700 I can totally understand the disdain if you look at it from a purely reductionist and materialistic perspective. Honestly he’s just as much a romantic as he is an intellectual so there’s that as well. Would you mind telling me which idea in particular you disagree with so that we can discuss?

[@mahehahee]

Lol

[@jamesgreig5168]

Always a pleasure to watch Jordan Peterson interviews. I must say, Lawrence is far more comfortable in this topic then his lecture on climate. One field he is an expert, the other, climatology, he tried to be an expert.

[@dasherfrommenasher]

WOW! Fascinating and exciting exchange between JP and LK. I am staggered with appreciation by the ability of each to draw out the very best from the other! I agree with every comment shared over the past 7 months, since this discussion was posted. I shall now listen to part 2 and follow-up with joyful reading from Genesis, Psalms and Romans!

[@BandasPalette]

Wow, the more I learn the more I know I will forever be a student of life. Great conversation!

[@khaderlander2429]

The worlds are instruments of knowledge. A signifier of something else.

[@AntiProtonBoy]

That's a good thing. This means there is always something new and interesting to learn about the world.

[@peaceislam1204]

.. but the question is, would it be beneficial to you..

[@JesusNOTreLIEgion]

continue your education as a student by listening to an opposing view provided by Dr. Stephen C Meyer. Just put his name into KZbin search and watch/listen with an open mind. with love, former atheist who grew up Catholic that now believes in the historical and spiritual accuracy of the Bible.

[@yumyum723]

@@peaceislam1204 it certainly isn't doing Islam any favours since tye Quran I'd riddled with scientific fallacies

[@swordarmstudios6052]

Jordan asks good thoughtful questions. He's a good interviewer for scientists.

[@pretol1]

It's a nice thing to do when you have a "bring your child to work day", but it's not something scientists enjoy on a regular basis.

[@electricpigs]

agreed

[@Arjun-eb1yc]

He seems to know enough physics to ask good questions and make it interesting.

[@parmachine470]

Obviously, you are not in a position to define what a good question is.

[@A_M_Bobb]

No he isn't. He tries desperately to support his original narrative-driven beliefs.

[@donnafoster5215]

Dr. Peterson’s honest attempt to understand something new is a wonderful model for engaging others. He doesn’t contend, but finds issues where he can get clarity on the topic.

[@LuigiAguilarC]

Amazing to see 2 brilliant human minds having a discussion in the most human and humble way.

[@jamesgreig5168]

We are very lucky to experience two such intellects on this accessible forum.

[@harrypalmer3481]

The older I get the less surprised about people I become, with increasing sadness. I'm so pleased at being surprised by how well this discussion went, thank you Gentlemen!

[@byjakeburgess]

never thought i'd see this crossover but i'm so glad it exists!

[@szotakandrei]

Imagine Jordan and Neil Degrasse Tyson

[@byjakeburgess]

@@szotakandrei in a perfect world

[@sandwich675]

@@szotakandrei nah

[@MorrisonEnterprise]

Krauss is bauss

[@stevepickford3004]

Shame Krauss couldn't listen for 2 seconds and actually have a conversation. It's sad that every public scientist seems to lack basic social skills.

[@jamesharris184]

How am I supposed to watch from the beginning to now in one sitting... Every time I start the rewatch it ocurrs to me "now" isn't what it was yesterday, and this realization is compounded by difficultiea I am having with my time machine but time waites for no one and I won't wait for me, or so admonished Mick Jagger Once Upon a Time. Thanks for bringing this wonderful guest into my event horizon. I am looking forward to his books!!

[@theheck5176]

I have watched Lawrence Krauss in several documentaries about space but this one with Jordan Peterson is blowing my mind.

[@dnelson5638]

Now we need an interview with Stephen Meyer to get the metaphysical view on cosmology and his book Return of the God Hypthesis

[@edmundas04]

The only problem with this podcast is that it’s too short

[@fatality9072]

We are so spoiled. We get to peek into an intellectual conversation with 2 legends for 2 hours and we still feel unquenched !

[@jamescollier3]

lol. omg this was 2 brilliant PhD's at a high level in two complex subjects at once lol

[@thetodhunter2124]

This was a particularly memorable one. Really enjoyed it from beginning to end. Such high quality conversation. I think it is key that both participants take the time to define context to words or phrases which both Jordan and Lawrence did regularly. I get the feeling they both enjoyed this one too

[@paulusclovis4363]

Pp p

[@sangeetsiv]

I'll say this for Dr. Jordan Peterson, whatever his personal motivations, the man is great at a debate. It's just interesting stuff and if you're worried about political bias you shouldn't allow that to censor yourself from watching people who don't align with your beliefs. Diverse perspectives really do matter. Lawrence is his usual great self in this, glad to see he's enjoying it.

[@r0ky_M]

You need to watch JP debate Harris and Dillahunty..he makes a right fool of himself.

[@ashok.vardhan.g]

@@r0ky_M I have watched his interaction with Harris at Pangburn, and in my observation I did not see him making a fool of himself, at any point. In fact the discussion stretched into 4 different occasions. About the Dillahunty one, I cannot comment on, as I have not yet watched it, so I am curious, at which point exactly did you observe him making a fool of himself?

[@ashok.vardhan.g]

@Budda Brotha I agree, hence my careful use of language, and the specific words "interaction" and "discussion" to illustrate their conversation.

[@galaxytraveler5779]

I watched many debates with Lawrence and religious scholars. Lawrence is fantastic in debates.

[@sysprogmanadhoc2785]

Peterson is my fav pseudo-intellectual

[@robertlee918]

I've felt so profoundly lonely all my life until now. Thank you Dr. Jordan Peterson and Lawrence Krauss!

[@microapple97]

You know what I want? A better way to connect with people who are watching the same KZbin videos, because I've struggled with profound loneliness too.

[@theohuioiesin6519]

Just take the risk and exchange email addresses. I won’t spam you.

[@TheZagiello]

After they finished podcast they started playing Warzone.

[@plimithsock]

Lol yelling I’m in the gulag

[@grunt6799]

HE'S ONE SHOOOOOOOT!

[@ChezzyKnytt]

@@plimithsock The image of JP fighting his way out of the gulag cracks me up lmao

[@christianebers]

Physicists don’t go to gulag. Only Jordan go to gulag.

[@marcos-gn8sq]

and that's that.

[@Remnants100]

I am in agreement with many of the comments here. This is without doubt one of the most interesting discussions ever posted on KZbin. Two great minds who are both able to articulate their particular views whilst keeping it respectful.

[@brendabarbosa5923]

I had never heard of Dr Krauss before and after hearing this discussion, I’m obsessed! I want to read all his books and listen to his ideas. He’s so easy to understand and follow, despite the ideas and discoveries being so complex. Plus, he just seems like a nice guy. He and Jordan together are such a good combination for interesting and provocative discussion. Thank you for doing this and enriching my understanding of the Universe. I could listen to them talk for 2 weeks straight!! 😝

[@oghaki5097]

Look a little further into this guy, he is pretty awful, surprised Jordan had him on.

[@scottyhugefellow1447]

Glad you like listening to him theres heaps of content out there. He converses well with Dawkins, I recommend their talk on titled something from nothing and his talks on the Issac Asimov memorial debates

[@jamesgreig5168]

Great physicist, but his attempt on Global warming was less than startling.

[@nicholaseaves2591]

I love how many times i hear Peterson elaborate on one of Krauss's thoughts and you see this look of amazement, surprise and joy wash across his face as he agrees with what Peterson says

[@incognitomcde1360]

I think it is beyond expectation for someone like him to not only have the interviewer comprehend what you are saying but then follow up with relevant, interesting questions (outside of his colleagues, mean). It’s probably a breath of fresh air to take the training wheels off in conversation and to have the other person not get that glazed look in their eyes.

[@chrisneal9268]

@@incognitomcde1360 100% I get similar satisfaction, although I’m listening and not engaging in the conversation.

[@charlesrump5771]

Whenever Krauss says "literally nothing", he means something.

[@CRHE]

Yeah, he’s been corrected by philosophers on this time and again, but he’s too full of himself to listen.

[@HolyKhaaaaan]

It means something that empirically is nothing. But just because it cannot be measured does not mean it does not exist.

[@glynsmith60]

To any JP fans...Im looking for an accomplished singer/acoustic guitar player with a folk/soft rock style to cover a fully completed song dedicated to Jordans 12 Rules books and philosophies.If you are interested and think you might be able to help let me know, and we can arrange contact! Thanks,

[@bryanfoster2651]

@@CRHE LOL This is not a question that philosophers can help with

[@GeroG3N]

@@bryanfoster2651 Yes, it is. It's literally semantics.

[@amygolds2435]

I love listening to highly intelligent people speak. Their back and forth makes me feel so dumb and yet here I am learning every time I listen to JP ❤️

[@PurpleChevron]

Huge fan of both of these gentlemen. I found the discussion enormously productive and cordial.

[@graemejack9040]

Fascinating conversation. I love watching Lawrence talk because he's always so energetic and enthusiastic. It was awesome to see Jordan matching that enthusiasm throughout the discussion.

[@mcrobsaccount]

hes antisocial and is disinterested by any ideas other than his own, never expanded on any points peterson made. Typical scientist bore imo.

[@ianwinslett5013]

He talks about so many things and says nothing.

[@geoffreyferguson1643]

Yeah I find it attractive to my brain to listen to people who are passionate about what they are aware of.

[@ianwinslett5013]

@@yamyoemerson2095 The problem is that science has turned into a religion of its own.

[@mcrobsaccount]

@@yamyoemerson2095 can you explain to me the science that says there's more than two genders. Because that's the claim science is making today, is that a hypotheseis you're willing to subscribe to? Science has become scientism

[@fisch5220]

These conversations are more packed with information than just about every school class I’ve ever participated in. Geez what a time to be alive!

[@jamesgreig5168]

I was just thinking that. This 2 hours had more information than 1 year of my university course.

[@renupathak4442]

Love Lawrence Krauss' s enthusiasm, articulation, abundant knowledge, and, though himself, a brilliant man how simply he explains the complex. Thank you Dr Jordan for your pertinent questions. I marvel at your interest

[@MarkosEvans]

Wow! I love Jordan Peterson. Such a great leader. Thank you. :)

[@rossalthor]

Lawrence Krauss is an absolute legend. I remember this man as a frequent expert commentator on Discovery and History channel shows promoting science long before youtube even existed.

[@lightworker4512]

@@eldarcasta1981 perhaps he is a flawed human being but I respect his knowledge in physics. People that point out flaws in others have their own deep seated flaws. We are all here to learn and evolve. None of us are perfect.

[@lightworker4512]

@@eldarcasta1981 If Lawrence teaches Ethics, I will not listen. For physics, I enjoy learning from him.

[@lightworker4512]

@@MeMe-qc6ow how did universe begin then?

[@wheelInmotion430]

@@MeMe-qc6ow actually guys like Krauss are trying to get away from the Big Bang because it actually helps prove the existence of God creating a beginning point, that ha since expanded. They like the multiverse idea or throwing around terms like “dark matter” or infinite emptiness.

[@wubdubb3374]

too sad, they've wasted their lives on nonsense lol. they cant comprehend reality.

[@nelsonang]

wow... when there’s humility, there’s beauty! extraordinary men... thank you!

[@Jason-ln7ot]

Enjoyable conversation. I appreciate you Mr. Peterson . The world needed you. Its fact to me that God and what he is is the beginning of the universe. Scientifically it is the only way possible. Your guest is corret in some part but not about God and the Beginning.

[@neitherland7321]

Fascinating.. how much education you get from this. Thank you Jordan and Lawrence!

[@marktullis6484]

I have a couple of degrees, a little understanding of science and physics, but seriously, I know nothing. This may be the most interesting discussion I have ever had the privilege to listen in to...

[@parmachine470]

were your degrees in nonsense and bull shit?

[@hughjanus7176]

@@parmachine470 The internet surely isn't a kind place :P

[@joshtaylor8617]

Par Machine KZbin scholar right here

[@lucamatteobarbieri2493]

@@hughjanus7176 Don't feed the trolls, just ignore them ;)

[@alanjohnson9336]

Saying you know nothing is a sign of your intelligence

[@areyoureal4707]

"It is so remarkable that it sounds cliche, it's like a discussion of love." 😊

[@tartanbessy436]

Thank you both 💛 this is helping me understand my anxiety. Being Autistic with ADHD and not being diagnosed with either until my late 30s and into my 40s, life has been in equal measure amazing and awful. My brain doesn't have filters so my brain never shuts up and does not filter out unnecessary thoughts.

[@craigfowler7098]

Try meditation

[@tartanbessy436]

@@craigfowler7098 have done since i was a teen ☺

[@craigfowler7098]

@@tartanbessy436 Great to hear that. I would recommend the Linden method

[@babsharris6724]

Homeopathics have a pill to stop thar & shut your mind up its Coffee Cruda & I've used it for years. It takes about 3 days .

[@TheBepax]

Another insightful discussion. Dr. Krauss explains science in a way that is real. It is pursuit of what is. reality. All the things we have learned on the way encourage us to continue. He has great faith.

[@Killsringman]

Huge fan of both gentlemen on this episode, Jordan's proclivity to mass produce so many intriguing podcast talks one after another amazes me, and I chuckled with joy and interest of Lawrence's huge (and swift!)enthusiasm of explaining the laws of physics in here, which is of course remarkable. Thank you both so much for having enriched my life as well as many others!

[@BlockchainGhost]

Ditto! Aside the remarkable content & energy of the podast, it's truly enjoyable to witness how these two great minds enjoy talking to each other.

[@jasonmckay8793]

blow some more smoke up asses mate lol

[@ArtistVisuals]

@@jasonmckay8793 England lost and thats ok

[@chrisd997]

I like dr Peterson trying to understand and most importantly how hungry he is to learn more about quantum physics. respect Sir ✊

[@multiquantumwell]

In fact he fears the truth that there's no god. He Is worried for loosing his metaphoric substrate of his ethos ☝️😂

[@avatar2833]

@@multiquantumwell I love Dr. Peterson, but he did not dare make those wishy-washy religious sophistry he usually employs in his pseudoscientific apologetics for Christianity. When it comes to psychology, and psychiatry, he is a truly gifted doctor and writer (also his cultural and ideological critique of modern culture).

[@holysquire8989]

What unites these two is their passion and joy for ideas and this joy suffuses the listener.

[@tamlynferreira8288]

Insane how interesting the end of this discussion was. 🤔 glad I found Peterson recently.

[@ryanballantyne1811]

What would you like to talk about? Peterson: “Yes.” Krauss: “Alright, I’m game.”

[@johnpepin5373]

I thought it interesting that Krause said the ground state of the electron is not zero because the universe is not infinite... suggesting a finite universe. I also found it interesting when he said someday other galaxies will be out of sight, because the universe is expanding faster than the speed of light... but I thought nothing could go faster than the speed of light. Which is universal in all frames of reference.

[@essaytv9527]

@@johnpepin5373 I'm no physicist, but i think the explanation to that was SPACE ITSELF is expanding, and so is not bound by the speed of light.

[@johnpepin5373]

@@essaytv9527 Maybe.

[@chewie8910]

This is awesome. When I was 14 or so, more of a church boy, I watched a couple of debates with Kraus and fundamentalists, and I disliked him because of my indoctrination I felt attacked and I was close-minded. Since then I haven't seen anything of him. I saw him in the thumbnail and remembered him so I was curious. I love this guy's mind and attitude, I have a lot of admiration. And I'm feeling pretty good about myself because this means I've grown into a more open minded person myself.

[@phineasrathbone6230]

If only he didn't visit Jeffery Epstein's island I might still have some respect for him

[@chewie8910]

@Melissa Oestreich I'm more of an agnostic. I believe there is a god, but I know I can't prove it rationally, and I understand that I don't know the meaning of life, and I embrace the mystery of life. (even though I believe there is a meaning that I discover little by little every day if I'm on the right path)

[@chrisc7265]

I was raised secular and find atheist mode Kraus to be missing the point entirely. I dismissed him based on some other recent convos, though I agree this one is pretty good.

[@apracity7672]

You dont have to prove it rationally, its already been done through many logically deductive arguments with sound premises. For instance the argument from contingency, the cosmological argument, etc

[@zzzap5425]

@@apracity7672 isn't that a method of rationalisation? Mind my lack of understanding in your statement. Just a question. Are you saying that due to his presumably right deductive arguments there is no need for rationalisation becuase its already done by the arguments? Again, i have not fully grasped these concerpts.🤔

[@benkeszabo]

Imagine you could go so far out of your field of expertise, and have such a deep conversation. Amazed.

[@varuna6089]

So much intellect between these two wonderful men. So much to learn.

[@ruizhang2452]

Love that quick little sympathetic smile on Peterson's face when Dr Krauss said his point couldn't get across in OxfordUnion debate because "they are all woke". 😁

[@fs5775]

more like a wry smile, it was fun.. ;)

[@henrinaths1]

Lol ...the festering sewer pit of mind controlling. (Apparently lightning is the cure.)

[@slorang414]

timestamp?

[@ruizhang2452]

Sam Lorang 1:30:30

[@michaelparsons3007]

People like Krauss are the ones that made the way for the woke with all their meaningless BS. Krauss is such an idiot he doesn’t realize that without meaning you can’t compete evolutionarily. He’s one of the stupidest smart people I’ve ever heard.

[@guitar0wnz]

It is just absolutely insane how every guest is a home run

[@scarlettardis2018]

How did I miss this! This is going to be an excellent conversation!!!!

[@avelinobatista1606]

Thank you, dr. J person! If we Lose the faith, Our life fall apart! We do not know what is up or down.

[@josephmoya9929]

The excitement in Krauss's face. I really enjoyed this!

[@mladenstoychev8254]

Never in my life had a conversation made me so happy.

[@mladenstoychev8254]

@@TheWorldTeacher replying to comments on KZbin. Lol I just appreciate being able to watch and listen such minds converse, man. None of my predecessors could do that.

[@TheWorldTeacher]

@@mladenstoychev8254 🐟 15. SUFFERING & HAPPINESS: To understand the nature of suffering, it is ABSOLUTELY imperative to first distinguish suffering from pain (and too, happiness from pleasure). There is a spectrum of pleasure and pain, with an extremely narrow neutral mid-point. Obviously, what constitutes a pleasurable or painful experience is dependent on an individual person's unique preferences. Not everybody likes the taste of chocolate. The feeling of pleasure/pain does NOT, ultimately, come from any external stimulus, believe it or not. It is located entirely in the mind and/or the intellect. That is the reason why highly-advanced spiritual adepts are able to renounce practically all pleasure-seeking activities, content with consuming simple foodstuffs and adequate sleep, and find continuous peace, happiness, and joy, within themselves (“ātmarāma” or “sva-sthaḥ”, in Sanskrit). Furthermore, the adjudication of whether a certain experience is either pleasurable or painful for a particular person can VARY according to circumstance. For example, one may have enjoyed consuming dairy products as a child, but as a vegetarian/vegan adult, find the taste of putrefied milk (cheese, yoghurt, butter, etc.) to be revolting. For one who is dying of starvation, the consumption of cactus leaves may seem to be rather pleasing to the senses, even though, in normal circumstances, it may be distasteful. There are THREE kinds of pleasure/pain: physical, emotional, and financial. For instance, consuming one’s favourite kind of fruit is physically pleasurable. Being hit by a falling coconut - physical pain. Falling in love is an example of psycho-emotional pleasure. Being angry at another - psychological pain. Winning a lottery is an example of financial pleasure. Being robbed - financial pain. There are three origins or CAUSES of pleasure/pain: one’s own body/mind (“adhyātma”, in Sanskrit) other persons/animals (“adhibhūta”, in Sanskrit), and material nature (“adhidaiva”, in Sanskrit). Some “suffer” pain from lack of money. Others “suffer” pain from an abundance of wealth. Some “suffer” pain from lack of food. Others “suffer” pain from an abundance of food. The quality of the “suffering” is different but the NATURE of the “suffering” is the same. OBVIOUSLY, in the previous paragraph, the term “suffer” is used in the stead of “experience”, because that is how the word is used in everyday parlance, in order to draw attention to the fact that pain can be due to an abundance of material opulence as well as a lack of material wealth. GENUINE suffering, on the other hand, is the result of mistaking oneself to be the author of one’s thoughts and actions, and other persons to be fully in control of their own thoughts and deeds. There are five forms (or symptoms) of suffering - all PSYCHOLOGICAL in nature: 1. Guilt/Shame 2. Blame/Bitterness 3. Pride/Arrogance 4. Worry/Anxiety 5. Regrets about the past and expectations for the future/Attachment to outcomes (i.e. being inattentive or negligent to the present moment) Suffering can be COMPLETELY transcended by understanding its source and consciously avoiding its manifestations. For example, as a child, your mother may have been particularly violent towards you. As clearly demonstrated in the chapter dealing with free-will, her violence was wholly due to her genetics and societal conditioning, neither of which were under her control. Blaming your mother for her actions leads to psychological anguish, which can only be cured by focusing on the sense of “I am”. In other words, by resorting to one’s essential nature (knowing one’s innermost being to be Pure Consciousness), one is emancipated from all sorrow. The initial feeling of anger towards your mother was a natural reaction to her violence, but the enduring resentment is existential misery. Any physical pain you may have experienced was just that - pain. That pain is not to be discounted, but it has probably faded-away into the distant past. The psychological distress or torment that you are currently experiencing is the ACTUAL suffering, and it can easily be negated by a proper attitude to life. When we contemplate painful past events (or possible future events) those thoughts occur, ostensively, in the present. It is simply not possible to experience the past or future - only the present moment and the thoughts and feelings of the present are experienced. Therefore, it is important to understand and acknowledge that suffering can only occur in the present and can be cured with mindful practices. It is beneficial to also consult a qualified psychotherapist on a regular basis, in order to slowly heal from such mental angst. When a man kicks his pet dog, the dog does NOT spend the remaining years of its life being angry or resentful towards its master. Dogs have very little concept of past, present and future, but live their lives from moment to moment. How unfortunate it is that lower animals are naturally more at peace with their circumstances than we highly-evolved human beings! Even if several of the more highly-evolved species of animals experience some of the five forms of psychological suffering, it does not seem to persist in the same way as it does for human beings. On a rather personal note, even before I fully grasped this teaching (and when I was a Theist), I sent the following message to my second ex-wife, which illustrates my understanding of her actions: “I want to assure you that I have absolutely no bitterness towards you WHATSOEVER for persecuting me. You are simply carrying-out the orders of your perverted, ignorant mind, and I pray that my Master forgives all your wicked thoughts and acts. My own heart is completely free of anger. I pity you and look forward to the day when you finally turn from sin.” When one fully imbibes the understanding that life is completely and utterly preordained, and that no living creature has individual free-will (see Chapter 11), one has no choice BUT to quit blaming, shaming, worrying, being prideful, and being attached to the results of his actions. Deep peace and happiness arises naturally as a consequence. Obviously, the understanding of the non-existence of personal freedom (as well as all the other concepts in this Holy Scripture) are also the result of destiny. The unfortunate fact is, even though unqualified peace is available to everyone, particularly in the current age (due to mass communication), very few human beings are destined for it. To put it very succinctly, true peace/happiness is simply the TRUE self. When the five forms of suffering come to an end (by liberation from the belief in individual agency), only unbroken peace of mind remains. It is completely independent of any temporal circumstances whatsoever. The common belief that happiness originates from sensory or psychological pleasures is an outright falsehood. One can eat only so much chocolate before the pleasure turns to pain. Even a man who fucks hundreds of beautiful women will eventually tire of his sexual conquests, and attempt to seek satisfaction by another means. “Pleasure” is often conflated with “happiness”, as are the terms “pain” and “suffering”. It ought to be noted that there is a rather blurry line between psycho-emotive pain and actual suffering, so any confusion is understandable. Cont...

[@TheWorldTeacher]

There are three kinds of PLEASURE, according to the three modes (“trī-guṇa”, in Sanskrit) described in Chapter 18: Pleasures in the Mode of PURITY (“sattva guṇa”, in Sanskrit) are those pleasures which seem to be difficult or hazardous in the beginning but turn-out to be sweet or enjoyable in the end. For example, studying medicine for almost a decade in university can be rather stressful and taxing, but once the student graduates and begins his career as a physician, he experiences the pleasure of being a healer to his community and earning a high-income. Pleasures in the Mode of PASSION (“rajas guṇa”, in Sanskrit) are those which are enjoyable in the beginning but turn to pain in the end. For instance, most everyone enjoys eating a slice of chocolate cake (or sweet tropical fruit, for those of us who are health-conscious) but the more of it one consumes, the more painful it will become, due to indigestion, bloating, and/or sugar-poisoning. Pleasures in the Mode of DARKNESS (“tamas guṇa”, in Sanskrit) are those which are toxic from beginning to end. For example, sleeping is a state of nescience (of daily life) and from the time one falls asleep to the time one awakens, one is prone to being attacked by one's enemies. Over-sleeping often results in lethargy. Smoking tobacco can also be considered tamasic, since ingesting smoke is toxic, and cancer may ensue. Humans have FOUR objectives, aims, purposes, or goals in life (“puruṣārtha”, in Sanskrit): 1. PLEASURE (“kāma”, in Sanskrit) includes all forms of sensual stimulation which provides a positive feeling in the mind of any particular individual. Thus pleasure-seeking is a legitimate aim, provided that it causes no undue harm to another living creature or to the biosphere. 2. PROSPERITY (“artha”, in Sanskrit) is seeking wealth in the form of real property or money, again, providing it has no detrimental effect on others (in other words, a legitimate means of accumulating wealth). Here, “legitimate” is used in the etymological sense of “lawful”. 3. RELIGIOSITY (“dharma”, in Sanskrit) signifies behaviours that are considered to be in accord with established universal principles, including duties, laws, morals, virtues, and righteous living. Read Chapters 12 onwards to become acquainted with the principles of religiosity/dharma. 4. LIBERATION (“mokṣa”, in Sanskrit) is freedom from suffering, as previously defined, and is considered to be the most noble of the four goals. This was traditionally interpreted as emancipation from the cycle of birth and death (“saṃsāra”, in Sanskrit) or soteriology (“going to Heaven”). As one goes through childhood, one naturally seeks sensory pleasures. As one enters adulthood, one starts to seek methods of acquiring material wealth, whether that be serving an employer, embarking on a mercantile enterprise, or seeking marriage to a well-to-do suitor. If and when one becomes disillusioned by pleasure and/or wealth, one makes enquiries into self-improvement and religious systems. When none of the former objectives provides the definitive peace and happiness which humans are ultimately seeking, one FINALLY aspires for liberation. Of course, there is no reason why ALL four objectives cannot be accomplished simultaneously. A truly-enlightened sage is fully comfortable in seeking pleasure (without going to undue lengths to achieve pleasure, and without being attached to the pleasures themselves), gaining sufficient wealth to meet his material requisites and the needs of his family, engaging in religious festivals and other dharmic activities (even if he has transcended all dogmas and rituals - most persons enjoy partaking in major religious festivities) and, of course, being liberated from the cycle of birth and death (or to be more accurate, from the sense of “doership“, which is, as explained, the origin of all psychological sorrows). “The animal does not have to face the kind of problems which oppress man and which are created by the operation of the intellect. An animal's sense of consonance and dissonance, affinity and antipathy, is intuitive and in-built as conditioned reflex, rather than subject to the complex interference of ratiocination, by which man is not only aware of his perceptions and actions, but also thinks about them. ” ************* “Pain and pleasure exist for animals, but it is not a problem for them, because the animal does not regret the past pain or fear the future danger. He lives in the NOW of nature. It is only the human being, who concerns himself with imagined opposites, which has a problem. There are, in fact, no opposites whatsoever, except as concepts, produced by the imagination.” ************* “It is impossible in life, to have the pleasure that is wanted, without the pain that is not wanted. They are, in fact, mutually interdependent, and therefore, inseparable.” ************* “One does not experience suffering - one suffers an experience. One who is aware of his true identity does not and can not suffer.” Ramesh Balsekar, Indian Spiritual Teacher. “Suffering exists, but no sufferer can be found. Actions exist, but no doer of actions is there. Nirvana exists, but no one who enters it. The Path exists, but no traveller can be seen.” Venerable Buddhaghosa, Visuddhimagga, 513.

[@michaellezama1398]

Ikr this convo puts a smile on my face

[@richardarcilla]

I am an electron captured by Peterson’s and Krauss’ proton/neutron.

[@yakkayakka360]

The parallels between physics and psychology at this level are astounding, but also perfectly logical.

[@PrLeveilleforIBC]

A beautiful and mutually respectful exchange that I throughly enjoyed.

[@noenken]

This was great, can't wait for the second meeting of these two.

[@jomcduff675]

Dear Dr. P., Each time I find a new upload here, my mood lifts a great deal. So gratifying to listen, learn--and engage again. Thank you!

[@cindysmalling4226]

This is so amazing!!! Thank you for this conversation! It’s powerful, enlightening and encouraging. “We are all religious. “We all want to believe.”

[@maxodgaard1335]

Not me, the world "as is", holds more than enough wonders.....

[@MrLeolesh]

@@maxodgaard1335 how do you know it exists, or rather how do you know what is a wonder in the first place? You seem to treat religion as a primitive science. Needless to say, you couldn't be more wrong.

[@maxodgaard1335]

@Leo Tsisin Religion and science mix as oil and water.... Religion no matter which, is a primitive way to try to comprehend the world.

[@MrLeolesh]

@@maxodgaard1335 it is not, nor is science. Thanks for demonstrating that you're utterly clueless as to the philosophy of both.

[@maxodgaard1335]

@Leo Tsisin Science makes you and me communicate now here on this platform on a server in the real natural world..... Religion will keep you dumb and ignorant. It will add nothing but fictional absurdities to human kind until enlightenment finally finishes it off....Sorry but it is what it is..... 🤷 what is even worse is that you got brainwashed as a child and now the delusion is so strongly built in you that you are blinded/cut off from reality..... You have the perspective of a child....

[@juang.garcia8454]

AWESOME CONVERSATION!! I ENJOYED THIS ONE SO MUCH!!

[@SvenRognelund]

This was the most interesting discussion I've heard in a long time. Those two hours passed in 20 minutes. Thanks!

[@paulusclovis4363]

Pl

[@luisfabricio6439]

You should watch the one he just posted with Sir Roger Penrose

[@treyjenkins5672]

Haven’t heard from Lawrence Krause since the Richard Dawkins era. Should be a good one.

[@nimamz73]

Exactly

[@stormhawk31]

After William Lane Craig destroyed him in a debate, he kind of went away quietly.

[@MrSidney9]

@@zz4484 me too .😂 I see what you did there

[@jwscheuerman]

@@stormhawk31 WLC is a formidable debater, in that he makes very effective use of rhetorical devices which can be hard to spot on the fly. However, his arguments are weak.

[@treyjenkins5672]

@@stormhawk31 William Lane Craig lost that debate😂😂

[@kristislonka4066]

WE NEED MORE OF THESE TWO!!!

[@JDSCT]

This is easily one of the best long form discussions I've watched in a long time. Really looking forward to their next meeting.

[@treyjenkins5672]

“I’m tempted to take it in that direction, but I think I’m going to continue to torture you about the structure of the universe.” Couldn’t have said it better myself JP.

[@brockmann4815]

Well it seems like the temptation got to strong during the end ^^

[@Choscura]

I sort of like seeing the last honest priest of the Roman Empire bouncing around everybody else's temples and learning how everybody has the same 'gods'

[@jjroseknows777]

Maybe one of you can tell me what WAS the direction that he was tempted to take it into? Maybe you can tell me what minute... I'd like to check out that point in time.

[@brockmann4815]

@@jjroseknows777 If I remember right, it was the realm of meaning and psychology, but he explicitly wanted to talk about science.

[@copperrod5122]

Looking great Dr. Peterson! Thank you for your amazing content 😎

[@SilverstoneTrace]

I met Dr. Lawrence Krauss at Reason Rally years ago and he’s awesome! Whoa!

[@joshuaswick]

The difference between someone that appreciates first principles and someone who doesn't. I applaud Lawrence Krauss on his patience here.

[@meinking22]

My initial thought during the discussion was that Dr. Peterson was trying to identify the precise cosmological moment at which chaos is first injected into the universe, but then the 1:25:00 point kicked in and we're talking about the religious impulse, scientific method, meaning, physics and a potential proto-framework for the Woke psychology. Fantastic stuff from both participants! Thank You

[@midnightwatchman1]

your comment saves me from switching off. it is the same thing he speaks about all the time at all this conferences does not say anything particularly interesting and giving opinion on topics that was not asked

[@TheProdigalMeowMeowMeowReturns]

No serious engagement with any of the best philosophers of religion.

[@PrivateSi]

I thought Peterson was mostly assessing Crazy Krauss's lefty liberal delusional, lofty, mindset and attitudes.. False humility that disrespects humanity mixed with conceited arrogance for himself and Science. Krauss is a proper nutter.

[@midnightwatchman1]

@@TheProdigalMeowMeowMeowReturns Krauss clueless and even worse he boasts about his ignorance. basically, if he does not know anything about it is not worth knowning. Philosophy and religion are useless in his worldview because he cannot test it. then comes up with his own framework which is equally untestable for finding purpose out of purposelessness

[@TheProdigalMeowMeowMeowReturns]

@@midnightwatchman1 I agree, although I’d qualify your use of “test” by adding the word “scientifically.” I think to an extent one can “test” the claims of natural theology with reason a la Josh Rasmussen, Ed Feser, David Bentley Hart, Rob Koons, etc

[@gregorywilkinson5731]

This got real good towards the end hopefully there's a follow up soon

[@john99776]

Totally disagree. It was good during the better part of the podcast, and then, just like religious people always do, Jordan started trying to make weak arguments to finish with, hoping to salvage some of his beliefs in the vain hope of overpowering Krauss and have listeners go away distracted by his religious nonsense.. I see this happen again and again, especially with Jordan. He always exhibits his weakness of religious belief, trying to make it look scientific. Which it is not....it's simply mental weakness. He squirms around and tries every feint and trick to make this foolishness sound convincing. He does it in every discussion.....and it doesn't fly. I don't respect the fact that he doesn't give it up and become convinced by reason, but just keeps it up nonetheless.

[@Sawedoff53]

I agree

[@Sawedoff53]

@@john99776 you don't know

[@gregorywilkinson5731]

@@john99776 how do you know?

[@CrimsonFlameRTR]

@@john99776 "He always exhibits his weakness of religious belief, trying to make it look scientific." It's like you don't even listen. He actually does the opposite. He makes it look un-scientific, because it is.

[@hemantdaulta1]

2 of my favorite public intellectuals, so excited to start this podcast! Such a delight.

[@kubrickenigma7977]

It's conversations like this that KZbin more of a global blessing than otherwise.

[@diazigy]

This entire conversation was amazing and I hope to see at least five more.

[@SolvingTheMoneyProblem]

Great conversation. Looking forward to part two on Krauss’s podcast.

[@Liberals_are_a_disease]

Krauss is a pea dough file and took Epstein's money and defended him.

[@MorrisonEnterprise]

If you're new, welcome. If you're not, welcome back.

[@meanwhileinsooke]

He almost died of drug addiction and covid what a fucking hypocrite

[@extraspecialk3244]

@@meanwhileinsooke He took a medication that his doctor prescribed him, then kicked it when he realized how bad it was. He never claimed COVID wasn't a serious illness. What hypocrisy are you referring too?

[@danteinferno175]

Totally underestimated podcast. Absolutely fascinating. And in previous podcasts sometimes I would feel like Peterson was "interrupting" his guest but in this podcast his questions were startlingly insightful and his enthusiasm only potentiated the responses of his guest. Anyone reading the comments here, watch the whole podcast! Fascinating!

[@1thesauceman1]

This dude is on fire wow, he keeps getting better and better. Would love to meet you Jordan, great guy.

[@unholykraut1107]

One of my favorite podcasts.

[@alexisidro]

Yes! Two magnificent leaders of two amazing fields collide; one explaining why and how behind human behavior (psychology), and the other one explaining why and how behind nature (physics). Why I love both! 🔥

[@257799nico]

As a former Krauss fan, and a current Peterson fan, this is an excellent treat.

[@Craznar]

As a former Peterson fan, and a current Krauss fan, it is also an excellent treat.

[@HelpMeFindTheseSongs]

"Former" Krauss fan? What do you mean?

[@510tuber]

lol why aren't you a krauss fan anymore? Did the religious people get to you?

[@bigmac8574]

Lawrence Krauss is a badass! Major fan!

[@ruyan247]

@@510tuber Krauss went on an ultra woke TDS spree and then got me-too'd. I devoured his books back in the day, but when Trump came along he became unbearable just like Harris for instance. I admire Krauss and Harris but they went a little too far.

[@danielasplund825]

Both of the gentlemen are providing a good case that living is actually based on a sense of comfortable outcome. When feeling okey you take it for granted but it's the only thing that you want when feeling bad. The substance of that hope is not the most essential but it is that there is a hope instead of hopelessness.

[@rondo1775]

Absolutely awesome discussion! Can't wait for part 2. Thanks.