Fujifilm X-T5 vs Sony A7RV vs Canon R6 mark II - high ISO comparison

[@RogerAVHansen]

00:00 Intro 00:57 introducing the cameras 01:29 Taking Fujifilm photos 02:55 Taking Sony photos 04:08 Taking Canon photos 05:28 Checking the photos in LrC 09:48 Conclusion

[@johntorp]

I think that the canon looks great on the colors, not sure if you guys had the same white balance. interesting to see it compared 😊

[@RogerAVHansen]

WB was probably off a bit, should probably have corrected that, but still Canon did win in the noise category 😊

[@Andy-nl4he]

You are comparing 3 cameras with three very different pixel densities (24, 40, 60 megapixel) of course the iso noise will not be comparable

[@flyingpotato3680]

Also wouldn't the xh2s be a better example fujifilms autofocus for stills and video is very usable but the autofocus for the 40 megapixel sensor has a harder time in video autofocusing and stills in certain situations. also you should only be using the linear motor primes and zooms thoes bring out the best in the autofocus I am.a wedding photographer i use fuji I use the xh2s for fast action portraits anything in during the day and for all my videos needs i have the 33 1.4 the 23 1.4 and 18 1.4 for ultra wide shots and indoor videos i use the 8-16 2.8 and for close up detail shots for example the engagement ring photos i use the 80 2.8 macro lens For low light portraits and low light indoor portraits i use the gfx 100s with the 50mm 3.5 and the 55mm 1.7

[@StianTorp]

Theres a lot of mosquitos😅 2:12

[@RogerAVHansen]

It was! 😅

[@StianTorp]

@@RogerAVHansen I believe you😅 Have to watch it again on my TV later on. Better to see the difference there😉

[@RogerAVHansen]

@@StianTorp oh no, we’re going to be huge! 🤣

[@romantkachuk168]

No wonder 24MP Canon wins. 40MP on fuji apsc is equivalent to roughly 80MP on FF. Plain physics. No surprise with the noise here. Though your pictures look very film-like haha. PS: god, those sony colors are awful, I thought they fixed that already

[@CharlesBrooker-i5t]

There are so many variables in this video that make it a total waste of time. Different lenses, different focal lengths etc. utterly pointless.

[@AndreSjoberg]

*This* is why I prefer the city and avoid nature at all cost ;)

[@fengmike9831]

I don't think Fuji loses too much.

[@0nglu]

You compare 100%, not the same physical size. :)

[@mbismbismb]

sony colours is dull not neutral hahaha

[@ottenburg]

Isn't this always the case? Fujifilm looks great by itself - until you compare it side-by-side with a good full-frame camera and then you realize what you are missing. I do like the handling and performance of the Canon R6 II, but at the end I sold it because a) it lacks an open lens mount, b) there are no stellar primes like the equivalent of the the Sony 24/1.4GM, 35/1.4GM or 50/1.4GM, and c) I was using it in outside in December (in Sweden) and it kept freezing up on me, even after not so much time outside. Canon really need to fix their lens strategy.

[@joggelweekend]

What did you buy?

[@ottenburg]

@@joggelweekend Sony a7RV. It isn't a perfect camera, but the best prime lens options by far.

[@SundaystrollerA7]

No, this is quite wrong.. you have to resize the Sony and Fuji to match Canon's 24 MP and THEN compare.

[@Burritosarebetterthantacos]

Canon-great color, a few expensive lenses, great AF Sony-ok color, tons of lenses, great AF Fuji-great color, cheap lenses, horrendous AF, aspc

[@NicoDa1]

yup, couldn't agree more.

[@truthseeker6804]

fuji AF is horrible. the r6ii top low light camera

[@wf3744]

Skip for sony