Full Committee Oversight Hearing

[@13FoxtrotProductionsLLC]

Why don’t we get veterans who have been fighting the system for years only to only be denied for benefits after 2 or 3 year waits for appeals

[@merlepatterson]

Interesting how the ranking member would rather the decisions be in the hands of "Unelected bureaucrats", than in the hands of "Unelected judges"? I believe there is Constitutional Grounds for judges to decide such things, as such; (a) Article III of the Constitution assigns to the Federal Judiciary the responsibility and power to adjudicate “Cases” and “Controversies”-concrete disputes with consequences for the parties involved. The Framers appreciated that the laws judges would necessarily apply in resolving those disputes would not always be clear, but envisioned that the final “interpretation of the laws” would be “the proper and peculiar province of the courts.” (Credit: Legal Information Institute) ...funny how you don't find anywhere in the contents and meaning of this Constitutional Article where deference is granted nor given to "Agency Officials"? It is an experts job to "Advise", it is the legal systems job to "interpret laws and settle disputes", it is the Legislatures job to "Make Laws".