Fundamentals of Logic - Part 1 (Statements and Symbols)

[@thehellfish1154]

Thank you for speaking at a slow pace. It really helps to understand and digest the information. Subbed

[@adamprance9456]

Thank you, I teach ESL so it is something I think about but I sometimes worry it will be boring. Glad that you find it helpful.

[@Tercurnich]

I love the "you are not alone" FFIX theme playing in the background, I certainly didn't expected it. Great video btw!

[@adamprance9456]

Glad you liked it!

[@matt-g-recovers]

So profound, this actually suggests that can optimize the way we think about problems not just the problem and it's solution.

[@adeshmishra7663]

One of the clearest video (with no assumption that the viewer knows some logic). It's just a great video.

[@adamprance9456]

Thank you, glad you found it easy to access.

[@prime-Chess-Moves]

Tomorrow is truly Tuesday..... What a timing.

[@xx_glader_xx3040]

Thanks man i’ve took an A at my test because of your lesson!

[@adamprance9456]

Awesome, glad it helped. :)

[@Yahweh5995]

Wish you more success man 👨 🙏

[@hinteregions]

This is an excellent introduction to logic and I thank you for it ^_^

[@benardkimahala2643]

This was exactly what i needed to expand my abstruction level interms of thinking...

[@adamprance9456]

Glad to hear it. I am updating this series, including this video on abstraction. Hope you enjoy. :) kzbin.info/www/bejne/oXjSo3eNhql9iKM

[@benardkimahala2643]

@@adamprance9456 thank you bro...

[@brianaragon1641]

So interesting... easy to follow and catch you're a good teacher

[@adamprance9456]

Thanks so much for the compliment, glad you enjoyed it. :)

[@adamprance9456]

Glad you think so!

[@fbxx9845]

The 3 basic Laws of Logic 1. Law of Identity 2. Law of Non-Contridiction 3. Law of Excluded middle

[@adamprance9456]

That sounds like an extra video. Watch this space. :)

[@alphabetboy6494]

thank you so much I really need this

[@ignacioleikis1784]

Hi there, awesome video. To be clear, the letters used in this video are used as stand-ins for simple statements, yes? Thank you, Are there any other great resources for learning logic?

[@adamprance9456]

Yes that is correct. Sorry about the delay. I have also used TrevTutor and Attic Philosophy as good KZbin resources

[@ignacioleikis1784]

@@adamprance9456 Thank you!

[@nexblawk6154]

Very good class

[@nightshocker03]

im only here because our exam is in the next week and our teacher decides to just give a bunch of texts and expects us to understand it :)

[@adamprance9456]

I hope it helped. :)

[@chabotaluputa7665]

Your amazing 🔥

[@johnpaulmalate9069]

Hey, uhm. Just a quick question about neither nor statements, are they negations of OR statements or something else? Thank you

[@danielbarabash1773]

Neither A nor B means == not A and not B ( !A & !B )

[@albrechetti]

Thanks for share it!

[@adamprance9456]

My pleasure! Glad you enjoyed. ^^

[@seetsamolapo5600]

Is this deductive or inductive logic or both?

[@adamprance9456]

Hi, it is mostly deduction (or natural deduction). You can use many of the same techniques for induction, but your premises are less certain. This series is being updated if you check our latest uploads. :)

[@Life-Teache]

Great and Thank you sir

[@yeethiolij]

Thank you for your teaching. But why don't you use a red pen while you teaching?

[@adamprance9456]

Hi there. When I made this video I did not have a writing tablet, I do now so if this video gets remade then I probably will use a pen. Thanks for watching :)

[@adnadnan3529]

Thank you sir .

[@ggates5371]

Good stuff

[@adamprance9456]

Glad you enjoyed, thanks

[@opalacios666]

Thanks.

[@hechpee]

I subbed..thank you

[@rinaabdelrahman9490]

hi, how can i get in touch with you?

[@adamprance9456]

Hello, sorry I haven't replied - I only recently came back to this channel (I am not a very organised KZbinr :) ) You can follow our FB page for MYEP facebook.com/lamdasigmarho/ and drop me a message there. Hope you enjoyed our videos.

[@a1-h8]

Bro tomorrow is actually Tuesday no way

[@bethanienaylor]

Statement: "This is a statement." 😆

[@nychan2939]

truth or falsehood

[@gopibble]

Don’t come to youtube to read. That’s what books are for.

[@kiteinthesky9324]

"The science of thinking correctly" is a really arrogant and inaccurate way to view the world. The emotions-based thinking most people use is far more important because working along that way of thinking is what actually persuades people and gets you what you want. Logic just makes you a pariah.

[@adamprance9456]

That's a great point and I will concede it would be more correct (strictly) to say that "Logic is the science of thinking correctly, within certain contexts." I am not sure I will go with you all the way to emotive thinking being *far more important* though - but we can certainly see that people people can be made to respond without logic getting involved. Furthermore, I would agree that not every decision needs to be made using logic (i.e. sometimes it is *correct* to not use logic) That said, I will definitely disagree with your last statement. Logic doesn't necessarily make you a pariah, and even if it does, that doesn't make you wrong.

[@TomatoShips]

Does anyone have a video or article that talks about the symbols ∈, ∀ and ∃ ?

[@adamprance9456]

I hope to get to it by the end of the year, but that might not help you. Sorry :/ The subject you want is "Quantifier Logic" and I'm sure someone has gone into it already on KZbin. :) Good Luck.

[@TomatoShips]

@@adamprance9456 - Thank you, is it also called "predicate logic"?

[@adamprance9456]

@@TomatoShips Yes I believe so, everything in logic seems to have at least 2 names!! 🙃