I have to add that this looks like a simple shape, but be careful and check the A-A section view. Your volume should not be 95,573 (or there around) it should be a bit higher. Have a good weekend.
@DanteEhome2 жыл бұрын
3 cylinders cut with 3 cylinders, and the middle can be achieved by extrude a triangle and fillet, or pipe→extude→combine. The hollow can be achieved by whether shell or manually scale a skin surface.
@KristianLaholm2 жыл бұрын
Give it a try, fillet of the triangle/trapezoid will not give you the correct geometry (it will not line upp nicely with the cylinders)
@matthewjacobs39522 жыл бұрын
96,314.5mm^3, using sweep and other surface tools. if you loft the center section you get a sag in the middle that I don't see in Kristian's model
@jeffwhalin2 жыл бұрын
I created a 2d construction sketch using the known dimensions (cylinders 56x50) and when the 60deg line was added it defined the overall height with the 143 width. Lofted the center section and shelled (2mm) selecting the faces of all three cylinders. The volume displacement of the body (IF it was solid) came out 95574.89. Using the Boundary Fill function closing the cylinders with construction planes the internal volume yielded 630856.00 mm^3. So "I" must be missing something to do with the section A-A. I saw no value in the section view, the hidden lines (side view) showed that the space between the two bottom cylinders close the gap above the 50mm tube height and the shell function worked as expected. Looking at the shelled cross section, this gizmo could be 3D printed but if it were sheet metal a 5th piece would be needed to fill the gap between the two lower tubes. I may have it all wrong, but I learned about Boundary Fill so my musings weren't a a total waste.
@jeffwhalin2 жыл бұрын
I'm a dummy, just looked at the section again, forehead slap time... My attempt was "the easy way". You got me!
@mnoreke2 жыл бұрын
The part volume is 96314, but the internal volume is 642255 mm^3. You had me with the simple method, so I had to fix the cross section. Nice little challenge. :)
@martinmarriott36072 жыл бұрын
Morning Kristian. Using solid lofting and shell I got 96,309 Using surface lofting and thicken I got 96,311
@sidrykchewo2 жыл бұрын
96308.31 mm^3, no lofting used.
@a330turbinex72 жыл бұрын
Volume is 96316.7534mm^3
@alexeyrybakov9492 жыл бұрын
96.308 or 96.310, depending on how to build.
@alexeyrybakov9492 жыл бұрын
96.316 after i fixed one option.
@lukaszb12822 жыл бұрын
96309 but I'd love to see cross-section to see the inside (the 'horizontal shelf' looks weird) ;)
@fpvkev81372 жыл бұрын
Hi. I shelled a solid body to 2mm to get 96.318 but i don't know the actual figure Kristian got
@darocka2 жыл бұрын
i get this volume 96316.753 mm^3, with one sketch and a few operations. PD. I like a lot your videos.
@TuxClaudiu2 жыл бұрын
Hi, love your vids and the way you make them, i got 95.567, btw i'm just starting to learn fusion, only by a week.
@KristianLaholm2 жыл бұрын
Check the A-A section view in drawing and compare to your model, it should be a "slot"-shape your volume is a bit low.
@StephenBoyd212 жыл бұрын
I'd say that you would start with the middle section. Two drawings which you loft between. This can then be shelled. The 3 ports can then be added. Hey I did it :) 3 sketches, 1 loft, 2 extrusions and a shell Volume 95.57, is that wrong :(
@KristianLaholm2 жыл бұрын
And your volume is? (if you get 95,573 mm3 check the A-A section view in drawing and you model)
@StephenBoyd212 жыл бұрын
@@KristianLaholm 95.57 almost exactly. I’m guessing that is wrong.
@KristianLaholm2 жыл бұрын
A bit to low. Check the A-A section in drawing and do a Section Analysis in Fusion of your model.
@StephenBoyd212 жыл бұрын
@@KristianLaholm 96.31??
@AndiSprick2 жыл бұрын
96316.753 mm^3
@michel3602 жыл бұрын
After some headbreak (and probably not the fastest methode...) i've got 96314.525 mm3