Fusion 360 Challenge - Trippel connector (April 2022)

  Рет қаралды 507

Kristian_Laholm

Kristian_Laholm

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 25
@KristianLaholm
@KristianLaholm 2 жыл бұрын
I have to add that this looks like a simple shape, but be careful and check the A-A section view. Your volume should not be 95,573 (or there around) it should be a bit higher. Have a good weekend.
@DanteEhome
@DanteEhome 2 жыл бұрын
3 cylinders cut with 3 cylinders, and the middle can be achieved by extrude a triangle and fillet, or pipe→extude→combine. The hollow can be achieved by whether shell or manually scale a skin surface.
@KristianLaholm
@KristianLaholm 2 жыл бұрын
Give it a try, fillet of the triangle/trapezoid will not give you the correct geometry (it will not line upp nicely with the cylinders)
@matthewjacobs3952
@matthewjacobs3952 2 жыл бұрын
96,314.5mm^3, using sweep and other surface tools. if you loft the center section you get a sag in the middle that I don't see in Kristian's model
@jeffwhalin
@jeffwhalin 2 жыл бұрын
I created a 2d construction sketch using the known dimensions (cylinders 56x50) and when the 60deg line was added it defined the overall height with the 143 width. Lofted the center section and shelled (2mm) selecting the faces of all three cylinders. The volume displacement of the body (IF it was solid) came out 95574.89. Using the Boundary Fill function closing the cylinders with construction planes the internal volume yielded 630856.00 mm^3. So "I" must be missing something to do with the section A-A. I saw no value in the section view, the hidden lines (side view) showed that the space between the two bottom cylinders close the gap above the 50mm tube height and the shell function worked as expected. Looking at the shelled cross section, this gizmo could be 3D printed but if it were sheet metal a 5th piece would be needed to fill the gap between the two lower tubes. I may have it all wrong, but I learned about Boundary Fill so my musings weren't a a total waste.
@jeffwhalin
@jeffwhalin 2 жыл бұрын
I'm a dummy, just looked at the section again, forehead slap time... My attempt was "the easy way". You got me!
@mnoreke
@mnoreke 2 жыл бұрын
The part volume is 96314, but the internal volume is 642255 mm^3. You had me with the simple method, so I had to fix the cross section. Nice little challenge. :)
@martinmarriott3607
@martinmarriott3607 2 жыл бұрын
Morning Kristian. Using solid lofting and shell I got 96,309 Using surface lofting and thicken I got 96,311
@sidrykchewo
@sidrykchewo 2 жыл бұрын
96308.31 mm^3, no lofting used.
@a330turbinex7
@a330turbinex7 2 жыл бұрын
Volume is 96316.7534mm^3
@alexeyrybakov949
@alexeyrybakov949 2 жыл бұрын
96.308 or 96.310, depending on how to build.
@alexeyrybakov949
@alexeyrybakov949 2 жыл бұрын
96.316 after i fixed one option.
@lukaszb1282
@lukaszb1282 2 жыл бұрын
96309 but I'd love to see cross-section to see the inside (the 'horizontal shelf' looks weird) ;)
@fpvkev8137
@fpvkev8137 2 жыл бұрын
Hi. I shelled a solid body to 2mm to get 96.318 but i don't know the actual figure Kristian got
@darocka
@darocka 2 жыл бұрын
i get this volume 96316.753 mm^3, with one sketch and a few operations. PD. I like a lot your videos.
@TuxClaudiu
@TuxClaudiu 2 жыл бұрын
Hi, love your vids and the way you make them, i got 95.567, btw i'm just starting to learn fusion, only by a week.
@KristianLaholm
@KristianLaholm 2 жыл бұрын
Check the A-A section view in drawing and compare to your model, it should be a "slot"-shape your volume is a bit low.
@StephenBoyd21
@StephenBoyd21 2 жыл бұрын
I'd say that you would start with the middle section. Two drawings which you loft between. This can then be shelled. The 3 ports can then be added. Hey I did it :) 3 sketches, 1 loft, 2 extrusions and a shell Volume 95.57, is that wrong :(
@KristianLaholm
@KristianLaholm 2 жыл бұрын
And your volume is? (if you get 95,573 mm3 check the A-A section view in drawing and you model)
@StephenBoyd21
@StephenBoyd21 2 жыл бұрын
@@KristianLaholm 95.57 almost exactly. I’m guessing that is wrong.
@KristianLaholm
@KristianLaholm 2 жыл бұрын
A bit to low. Check the A-A section in drawing and do a Section Analysis in Fusion of your model.
@StephenBoyd21
@StephenBoyd21 2 жыл бұрын
@@KristianLaholm 96.31??
@AndiSprick
@AndiSprick 2 жыл бұрын
96316.753 mm^3
@michel360
@michel360 2 жыл бұрын
After some headbreak (and probably not the fastest methode...) i've got 96314.525 mm3
@fpvkev8137
@fpvkev8137 2 жыл бұрын
Hi Kristian. I got this result 96.318.291mm^3
Fusion 360 - "Strange Cube" my Workflow
15:00
Kristian_Laholm
Рет қаралды 515
You ONLY Need 12 Commands in Fusion  (Expert Advice)
12:14
Tyler Beck of Tech & Espresso
Рет қаралды 36 М.
1% vs 100% #beatbox #tiktok
01:10
BeatboxJCOP
Рет қаралды 67 МЛН
Quando eu quero Sushi (sem desperdiçar) 🍣
00:26
Los Wagners
Рет қаралды 15 МЛН
Каха и дочка
00:28
К-Media
Рет қаралды 3,4 МЛН
So Cute 🥰 who is better?
00:15
dednahype
Рет қаралды 19 МЛН
I Remade Star Wars VFX in 1 Week
10:39
ErikDoesVFX
Рет қаралды 2,6 МЛН
Fusion 360 - Sweeping Ribs on a Vase
18:55
Kristian_Laholm
Рет қаралды 41 М.
Design & 3D Print Triple-Start Threads using Fusion360
26:09
Shop Therapy
Рет қаралды 26 М.
10 tips for Fusion 360 that I wish someone told me sooner.
12:32
Austin Shaner
Рет қаралды 430 М.
Hirth / Rosette joint in Fusion 360 (no trigonometri)
21:51
Kristian_Laholm
Рет қаралды 4,3 М.
1% vs 100% #beatbox #tiktok
01:10
BeatboxJCOP
Рет қаралды 67 МЛН