FUTABA 26SZ - Look and Feel

[@michaeltrager4381]

What about the screen resolution compared to the 18SZ? Is the screen smaller with a better resolution (characters more defined)? I would think that after 8 years the screen would be improved!

[@johnmueller5482]

Beautiful radio enjoy ronald

[@flyboyowen]

I need bigger spaces between the top switches on my 16iz, does the 26sz offer this ?

[@michaeltrager4381]

I believe he said there is more room in this video!

[@teamfutabaspeedfresh8339]

I’m getting that after I get my new Futaba 32MZ WC

[@thinano]

Great radio. But not compatible with FASST :(

[@VipiModel-nk3ce]

Totally agree, i think a lot of people will not buy this transmitter for that reason

[@michaeltrager4381]

FASST is kind of outdated now. I would rather have all the benefits of Telemetry! Futaba could add FASST if they really wanted to....

[@VipiModel-nk3ce]

i have 18sz 70 anniversary, 16sz and 16 iz super all of them with Fasst protocol, new 26 does not work Fasst protocol, for that reason will not buy it, bad idea from Futaba to remove Fasst protocol in a new transmitter that cost almost 1000$, very bad idea

[@plemli]

Without FASST I would need to throw 30+ receivers in the trash, so No. No. No.

[@michaeltrager4381]

Maybe a future firmware update will include FASST and other Protocol's???

[@memememe2674]

Futaba is made of cheap looking and feeling plastic. Even years ago JR high end sets were metal framed. Futaba is no better than radio master now

[@michaeltrager4381]

I disagree, have used Futaba since 1980 and they are superior to the other manufacturer's!

[@jh1982a]

If the 26 is made similar as the 16, which the 16 feels plastic and cheap.. I would have to agree...