Immortals do pretty good, for their much lower price, and being a Tier 2, instead of Tier 3 unit.
@ChristopheLB2 жыл бұрын
And their supply cost
@ZC.Andrew2 жыл бұрын
They also do well as numbers grow. 20 Immortals beat 20 Thors, and annihilate Ultralisks. You can see it start to happen here in the vid.
@scarletcat4735 Жыл бұрын
Yes. And Immortal also has turret tracking, which Thor doesn't, thus Immortal can keeps firing back when retreating, while Thor has to turn around when retreating.
@joshuamoskovitz40742 жыл бұрын
"Immortals. We'll put their name to the test."
@whateversgoinonhere64272 жыл бұрын
This is one of the reasons why StarCraft is amazing. There's a difference in between numbers and upgrades
@zes7215 Жыл бұрын
wrr
@douglasmacarthur7777 Жыл бұрын
Thor is the only one capable to deal huge damage to air units
@sinuhebilleter73072 жыл бұрын
MInerals: Immortal costs 275 mineals (so should be 10,9 Immortals versus 10 Ultralisks or Thors). Gas: Immortals cost 100 gas (so should be 20 Immortals versus 10 Ultralisks or Thors) Supply: Immortal costs 4 supplies (so should be 15 Immortals versus 10 Ultralisks or Thors). Minerals are very cheap and with easy acess. So we should focus more on gas and supply for a real comparisson. So, perhaps 11-15 Immortals should do the trick.
@tyrellwreleck42262 жыл бұрын
I don't think it's practical to compare the cost of unit. Zerg mines heavy than terran or protoss. In a mid to late game, zerg can reproduce any composition in an instant. Terran has mules which can replace scv in a late game in order to free up supply for thors. Making terran gets the army supply advantage. Protoss is kinda OP because you can have mass carriers to protect the immortals and it's super hard to defend as zerg.
@razvncazacu3573 Жыл бұрын
Valid point
@ionut.dragoiu Жыл бұрын
Yes, but you forget that Thor can also fire to the air units, is more versatile like immortals and utralisk...
@szymonrozanski69382 жыл бұрын
Immortals problem is its small size here. VS Ultra because they are so small they can get hit by mutiple aoe of Ultras compared to Thors. And VS Thors they suffer because of mobility ironically, Thors can outmanouver immortals tahnks to their size so they dont get stuck on each other as often. But thanks tho their size they are far more useful in situations were the map heavely limits how wide the combat area is. Though the units didnt have every signle upgrade like Ultras charge and Thors bombardment for example. But still, it does show pretty well how cost effective those units are.
@bam3xs2 жыл бұрын
This for once, but don't forget, immortals are 4 supply, while Thors and Ultras are 6. Sure, there are exceptions to this, but generally speaking, more supply (-costs) should win against less. So if we go by that, 15 Immortals vs. 10 Thors/Ultras, it would be quite a different outcome
@tuskular2 жыл бұрын
@@bam3xs id say it's more supply to cost ratio. Roches are extremely cheap for there supply at 12.5 gas, but bane-lings are 50, ghosts are 62.5, high templar 75. Ofc minerals do apply to some units like immortals that are mineral heavy, but generally gas is the main tell at how supply efficiency a unit is.
@watergrasses8993 Жыл бұрын
thor has longer range immortal can defeat thor when 100vs100
@watergrasses8993 Жыл бұрын
well 50 immortal can defeat 55 thor
@darilcastillo92402 жыл бұрын
En mi opinión, los Thors son mejores. No solo sirven como fuerte línea defensiva en tierra, sino como línea sumamente ofensiva en aire. DIOS como destrozan cosas aéreas. FEEL THE THUNDER!!!!
@joaopadua71342 жыл бұрын
Bro remember when immortals were actually immortal, before blizzard recked them to the ground
@ZC.Andrew Жыл бұрын
They're still pretty good dude...
@egebabus34238 ай бұрын
you do realize they are cheaper right? in a realistic fight there would be more immortals
@cheepain8722 жыл бұрын
the last battle even tho the thor walking around doing nothing in the first few second and they still win ahha
@JasonLee-rg5yg2 жыл бұрын
immortal takes 4 supplies and the others take 6 supplies
Immortal is the cheapest of the 3, and also more of a mid game unit while the other 2 are late game units. Immortals also have the fewest hard counters, I'd pick immortal over the other 2 any day.
@williambrinkmeier17722 жыл бұрын
If the immortals kited I bet they would beat the ultras despite the cost difference could likely do it with only 9 vs 10
@patorancio86802 жыл бұрын
nice!
@VuLinhAssassin Жыл бұрын
Remember back during Wings of Liberty, the Thor can stunlock an Ultralisk with 250 mm cannon to death and Ultra wouldn't be able to do a thing...
@eduardoquispe63672 жыл бұрын
Inmortal is the best
@douglasmacarthur84822 жыл бұрын
You get take this into consideration: Thor is a mighty anti air unit as well.
@shuyizhang60432 жыл бұрын
How come ultra can beat Thor in this vid but in other vids ultra lose against thor
@Burt10382 жыл бұрын
it looked to me like there was a significant delay in the Thor's attack animation. The Ultra was practically on top of it before it fired its first shot.
@SomeonePlaying322 Жыл бұрын
Los inmortales necesitan un buff
@DinmaSalitzey Жыл бұрын
Old harden shield immortal would have destroyed ultra and thor.