Geneticfreek Reacts To Every Sith From Weakest To Strongest

[@foxtrot-gamesandwit4475]

I do feel like the Banites never really got to show off since their plans required subtlety it's kind of hard to determine their power level since power wasn't necessary for them

[@sanyidupla8830]

It is beyond clear that they are all stronger than Bane, and also stronger than the generation before them

[@tankielite8723]

You should make a series reacting to the Clone Wars show

[@Geneticfreek]

I plan to :) ,I haven't seen any of those yet

[@sami12569]

Hey cool video, great thoughts all around.

[@astarothnyarlathotep3815]

I've never before seen so much bias for the Banite Sith... Swallowing their delusions about their power and progression - In spite of overwhelming evidence to the contrary... Especially in terms of feats. This guy just works off of countless contradictory statements, picking and choosing what he likes... Rather than going by any actual feats. Most of the ancient Sith sweeps the floor with the majority of the Banite Sith. There are ofc exceptions, and Sidious is idd one of them. But not by so much as some seem to think. At the end of the day, everyone seem to forget that their greatest feats are often pale shadows of the Sith that once invented them. Sidious bing a semi-exception with his development of force storms(although they were likely created by either Vitiate, or Revan. Depending a bit upon your perspective). But Dooku in particular is nowhere near most of the ppl on this list. Oh he's above Maul and Savage Oppress. But compared to the likes of Revan, Vitiate, Nox, Exar Kun, or Nihilus? He's nothing. Both Maul and Savage show greater potential tho.

[@sanyidupla8830]

Debunk Maul being stronger than every Sith before him except for his masters

[@astarothnyarlathotep3815]

@@sanyidupla8830 Ehhh? What? Maul lost to a bloody low force potential Padawan... In large part due to arrogance yes, but he still lost. And not just by that surprise blow, he also lost his saber in head-on combat half-way through. Maul is a joke in terms of immediate ability, compared to the vast majority of relevant ancient Sith names. He had pretty good force potential and quite a bit of natural combat talent. But he wasn't taught very well, as Plagueis notes. And he has no significant force feats to his name. I'm fairly confident he'd even lose to someone like Sion without his immortality technique. Let alone stand a chance against the likes of Tulak Hord, Naga Sadow, Marka Ragnos, Revan, or Vitiate.

[@StefanWinchester]

I totally disagree with this mans placement of maul. I love maul i do but he was a sith lord in name only he had few sith powers no lightning or anything. So how is maul more powerful as darth tenebrous and malgus ? Thats madness

[@wulvesgaming3523]

Please do reactions to Star Wars videos by DuduFilms