and they say that we don't have quality equipments
@usar72493 күн бұрын
Who says?
@CarnageXAddy388z3 күн бұрын
Jhaatu angrez for a reason
@User912723 күн бұрын
Poopistanis khete hai 😢@@usar7249
@abhilashyadav22743 күн бұрын
name a few of yours.
@adied_20013 күн бұрын
Western nations have same similar thoughts for russian,indian and chinese made equipments... @@usar7249
@anapurba9033 күн бұрын
Royal navy ❌ Lau*a Navy ✅
@saikiranrao19416 сағат бұрын
Zyada time nahi hua he bhaii 😂 inhone hi hamari Mari thi isi navy neh ek island koh ek time par mvp banaya tha
@Breath3003 күн бұрын
Carles de Gaulle is the best aircraft carrier outside the us super carriers
@LMessii103 күн бұрын
Absolutely
@SinghOm_Indian073 күн бұрын
NO DOUBT
@PrincepratapsinghRawat-cw5em3 күн бұрын
Ya
@yugalysk33953 күн бұрын
Charles de Gaulle : Chota pack bada punch.
@Karan.j.s-999-t9q3 күн бұрын
Why ? Plz can Anyone explain ?
@ashishbabu16173 күн бұрын
MRFA: Can't take off every time.
@Ironhide2343 күн бұрын
Isse ache to hamare aircraft carriers hai stobar hai par active duty pe rhete hai na ki maintaince pe
@saikiranrao19416 сағат бұрын
😂😂 han bhaii khali air craft carrier seh acha toh loaded f35 wala carroer he kisi bhin condition main , Vikramaditya bhi bahat time tak out of service tha jyada time nahi hua join karke , Virat par aircrafts hi nahi hein
@kaustubhchoudhary34633 күн бұрын
Meanwhile Russians operating their Kabad khana (Kuznetsov) since last 40 years - First time ? 😎
@onlinetricksandtips96133 күн бұрын
Russia doesn't need an aircraft carrier They have a large number of submarines.
@cibertron48603 күн бұрын
Hope our vikrant not faces same sinario
@axel6653 күн бұрын
Kuzentsov is old and. Faulty
@PrincepratapsinghRawat-cw5em3 күн бұрын
@@axel665 really it's so shitty
@chakraborty19893 күн бұрын
@@PrincepratapsinghRawat-cw5em it has issues related to breaking up of USSR. When it left Sebastopol for the last time to join Russian navy, defying Ukranian order to stay anchored in the mentioned port, it was like 90-95% complete. Back then Russia has no port that has experience with carriers and Ukraine refused to help on finishing the kuznetsov. Russia somehow finished the project but it's was forever crippled.
@arpitraj88423 күн бұрын
They could have made it a CATOBAR carrier, and should have invested on making Eurofighter, as a carrier capable fighter instead of F-35B or they could just have purchased the F-18s from Boeing, but all they did was choosing the worst option available to them 😅
@tejasahuja62183 күн бұрын
It's more like they did what US told them to do
@marcd51963 күн бұрын
they could have made it into a CATOBAR if they went for 1 carrier., not 2. Maybe made it a bit smaller. But they wanted to show to the world "We have 2 Supercarriers". Uk is all about bloating and being fake. "Great" Britain "Royal" armed forces "Super" Carriers.
@mrahulkeya81423 күн бұрын
Keyboard warriors incoming! 1,2,3..
@yashansh83173 күн бұрын
And they say , they will go for war with Russia 😅
@Mr.A3863 күн бұрын
5:40 cost effective aur cheap dekhte dekhte hi hamare pas khud kuch achhi tech nahin hai
@reallyliberal26553 күн бұрын
How?
@Mr.A3863 күн бұрын
@reallyliberal2655 ab agar ye le lenge to atleast 20 years k baad jab ye retire hoga tab hi aise aircraft carriers khud banane ki sochenge not now or inbetween
@riderpraniz39443 күн бұрын
Sahi kaha vai apna hi sirf acha dekhta hai defence matrix baki ka sirf kabar😂
@nikunjthakkar48093 күн бұрын
Time ke hisab se socho 10 saal baad milna aur abhi 2 saal mein milna ...
@reallyliberal26553 күн бұрын
@@Mr.A386 nai nai I'm asking ki tune jo likha hai " yeh cheap dekhte dekhte hi hamara pass kuch achi tech nai hai " yeh kya soch ke likha bhai? Hum itna bhi Vella nai hai ki acha tech nai hai hamara pass
@bramha96803 күн бұрын
Lots of lessons for us, we need to focus more on missiles like the LR-AShM and SSNs instead of obsessing over white elephant projects
@futureprenur95943 күн бұрын
Am sure Indian Navy knows Lott more about ac than other countries and also the type of equipment what we use including defensive missiles
@md.sarmadraza3 күн бұрын
In missile technology things are going well but focus shouldbe onSubmarines. Most effective platform is Submarine in naval war and we are lacking in numbers of submarines
@ndeepanshu65413 күн бұрын
@@md.sarmadraza throw some net and the submarine fails.
@bramha96803 күн бұрын
@@md.sarmadraza I agree, a large Nuclear attack submarine fleet makes the most sense for India, the recent approval of two SSNs is a step in the right direction but a lot more needs to be done
@futureprenur95943 күн бұрын
@@md.sarmadraza need more budgets we got very capable asw capabilities as well but yes submarines are also needed but we need a larger ac fleet also for power projection and domination of Indian Ocean along side 8-10 ssn 21 scorpene and other normal class submarines and few ssgn and a fleet of 4-5 supercarrier and 10-12 next gen destroyer along with 5-6 cruiser class ships and 20 more frigates which bigger more powerful than latest class what we have
@BlackHeart-79783 күн бұрын
Things made from looted money don’t last long.😂
@Muhammad_Lenin_Thomas3 күн бұрын
In British Empire aircraft everytime sunks.
@TheROI-republicOFindia2 күн бұрын
Thomas ki jagah Mussolini likhna tha😅 jyada sense banta
@prathameshtrimbakkar64983 күн бұрын
A detailed video on dry thrust kaveri engines developed by Bramhos Aerospace.
@ap86723 күн бұрын
Df17 sabhi aircraft carrier ke liye challenge he !
@shivammalikO13 күн бұрын
India need 3rd Super carrier by 2030, so it can counter the rising threat in Indian Ocean
@-Blue-_3 күн бұрын
Sabse bada threat US Navy hai
@unknown_51072 күн бұрын
@@shivammalikO1 Don't have money for super carriers, they have to focus on SSN & destroyer fleet, also it's almost impossible to make super carrier in just 5 years even the Vikrant class carrier will took next 10 years to commission if they start making from now.
@shivammalikO12 күн бұрын
@@unknown_5107 it is not about the budget, but priority. And you can't replace the carrier with a submarine. Both have different roles to play. The carrier is not only a part of the fleet but a power projection tool. 3 carrier will allow indian navy to keep 2 always ready for action while third in repair and maintenance
@unknown_51072 күн бұрын
@@shivammalikO1 Do you have any idea, how costly super carriers can get? The empty ship will cost them $5-6 billion atleast( roughly $10billion with CATOBAR+nuclear propulsion), atleast $15 billion for other systems including fixed & rotary wing aircrafts and than they need full fleet with dozens of other warships like Destroyers, frigates, Corvettes, support vessels and submarines. The whole thing will cost them $30-40billion. 3 carriers are necessary and they are already working on it (IAC-2 vikrant class).
@hiteshkumarsaini19072 күн бұрын
NATGRID, National Counter Terrorism Centre, NTRO, Special Group, Special Frontier Force, NSG, SPG की क्षमताओं, विशेषताओं, फायदों, उपयोग में लिए जाने वाले संसाधनों के बारे में वीडियो बनाएं।
@hiteshkumarsaini19072 күн бұрын
Defence Space Agency ने अभी अपनी Strategic Readiness को Space Warfare में परखने के लिए ‘Exercise Antariksha Abhyas - 2024’संपन्न किया है। AFSOD ने कच्छ में 28 सितंबर 2019 को 'Smelling Field', और 'DANX-2019', को अंडमान निकोबार में संपन्न किया था। Defence Cyber Agency, Defence Space Agency, AFSOD के द्वारा कितने वृहद स्तर ये Exercise की जाती है, उनसे भारतीय सुरक्षा को किस तरह रणनीतिक लाभ मिल सकता है? USA, UK, France, Germany, Russia, China के Special Forces के मुकाबले और उनकी क्षमता में हम कहां तक है। इसके वीडियो बनाएं।
@sandeshm96003 күн бұрын
Indian Navy should buy and restructurise and test and induct if all weapon system is working perfectly with higher efficiency in each and every aspect.
@chandrachurniyogi83943 күн бұрын
India should grab one or both carriers if Royal Navy plans to sell them . . .
@ndeepanshu65413 күн бұрын
Those are worst of their kind of aircraft carriers.
@sifattauhid76593 күн бұрын
This are date expired carriers
@marcd51963 күн бұрын
good for nothing carriers.
@chanakya54803 күн бұрын
What is the use of this carrier if we don't get F 35
@chandrachurniyogi83943 күн бұрын
@@marcd5196 your so very wrong my friend . . . it is one of best surface combatant built by Great Britain by far . . . the carrier is a victim of it's own attributes, new untested technologies . . . the decision to acquire the F-35B made things worse from a financial standpoint . . . maintaining the F-35B is costing the navy more than operating the carrier . . .
@ArvindKumar-ts9ht3 күн бұрын
Hii Mr. Defence Matrix… I request you that plz make a video regarding to comparison of air craft engines in depth. Contents - F135-PW-100: F-35A Snecma M88 GE F414 Saturn izd 30 1. Russian engine main GE aur PW ki tulna main thrust kam kyu hota hai ? 2. India F414 Ki jagha F100-PW-229 kyu nahi leta 3. Jaise F35 single engine use karta hai jo ki biggest engine hai power main vaise hi russia kyu use nahi karta 4. Rafal main itna kam power full engine kyu use hota hai then Ge & PW. 5. Kya jyada power full engine Se Range km kam ho jati h Dear please reply if u don’t make a video and clear my doubt .🙏🏻
@bebyfun3 күн бұрын
पकिस्तान SLBM SMASH पर वीडियो बनाए क्या नेवी शिप के बराक मिसाइल इसे रोक सकते हैं या AAD ही विकल्प है
@hiteshkumarsaini19072 күн бұрын
Zumwalt Class Destroyer के बारे में Detail Video बनाएं और यह भी बताएं कि क्या भारत को Zumwalt Class Destroyer के Design जैसे Stealth Destroyer को बनाना चाहिए या फिर इसी प्रकार के Stealth Frigate बनाना चाहिए ?
@Aerrow623 күн бұрын
Aircraft carriers need to be nuclear powered for them to be relevant in today's world. Thats because the space taken by oil for the ships propulsion can be as much as 35-40% of the ships total tonnage and thats no longer available for aircrafts. The reactor only takes 10% -15% of the volume, runs for 15 years and frees up 40% of the ship for Aircraft fuel, ammunition storage and workshop areas. Conventional ships need more supply support than nuclear ones. For carriers, its a major consideration, unlike in destroyers and small submarines. Space efficiency is also the fundamental reason for catapults. The nuclear carriers are typically only 40% larger than conventional but carry 4 times the aircraft, fuel and ammo. Their sorty rates are much higher.
@senbagamuthurahul-27463 күн бұрын
Better they sell one to India😁 as Repartition from colonization
@knowledged84203 күн бұрын
Pehle India ka kudka carrier koi kobra che kom nahi hai lekin India phitorot Batu mae Bora hai
@P-S-N.1233 күн бұрын
CATOBAR hota EMALS ke saath tho fir bhi soch sakte the, modify karna jyada problem ho sakta hein, bhale hi sasta lage
@shankarnarayanbharati52673 күн бұрын
Ja ja chini dalal nijer chorkay tel de. Tor choti pishi re ready thakte ko, 2024 se Moharastro result 2026 se WB te repeat korbe Gerua shibir.
@nikunjthakkar48093 күн бұрын
Yeh log toh humein topi pehna na chahte hi hai. Ye pehle offer hue hi they. Ab aadhi kimat mein meile toh lena chahiye
@vinodkaka52253 күн бұрын
Yar mujhe to isbaat ki fikar he ki Uk ke indono Aircraft carriers me se jrur Koi ek humare galle pdega aur vese bi humare yaha defense policy makers me se ek strong lobby bethi hui he aur vo bi indian military ko capability driven military force banne se zaida cost effective solutions ke piche baagte firte he chahe fir capabilities compromised hojaye pr paise hr haal me bachne chahiye.. So ye UK ke Aircraft carriers me se jo bi hume offers agr kbi hota he to usko Stoval se Stobar carrier bnane me lgni vali costs ko bi hume factors in karna hoga kyunki meri nazar me STOVL se STOBAR carrier fir bi better hote he Aur ab to Italian defense company finmehinca + Leonardo dono milkr STOBAR carriers ke liye AWACS platform develop kr rhe he jo Mig29k/F18/Rafale fighter jets ke size ka he aur vo AWCAS, aircraft ki tail section me ek Ramjet rocket engine jesi technology pr vo loog kaam kr rhe he jiski help ek moderate size fix wing AWACS platform STOBAR Carrier se easily take off krlega Aur arrested cables ke sath land krlega Aur us AWACS Platform ka radar coverage & flying range Ka31 helix AWACS helicopter & AW101Merlin AWACS helicopters se kehi zaida he aur iske saath saath same moderate size UAV mid Air refullers bi develop kiye ja rhe he jo STOBAR carriers se bi operate hoskate he ekbar ye dono platforms develop hogye to fir indian ke mazze hi mazze hoge Aur humare dono Aircraft carriers se fixes wing AWACS platform & UAVs refulers bi operate hona shuru hojayege isliye hume UK ke STOvL aircraft carrier ko kharidne se pehle uske saare pro's & cons bi considered krne hoge.
@andle1233 күн бұрын
Rishi ko bola giya tha... discount kar do, humlog utha letey hai, upgrade karke use kar lenge. Suna nahi woh
@averagestudent52233 күн бұрын
BAR in CATOBAR is "Barrier Arrested Recovery" and not "Butt Arresting Landing"! Peace
@Bishal_Goswami3 күн бұрын
India se madad maang le hum bana denge😉
@hasanferoz23643 күн бұрын
Atleast they don't forget to close submarine hatch 😂
@TradingwithAnxiety3 күн бұрын
Literally fake news 🤣 @@hasanferoz2364
@anmolavi44183 күн бұрын
Let's buy one from UK 😂
@mth4693 күн бұрын
no
@RahuluddinGandhy3 күн бұрын
No bro
@SomarcoSSJDieyoung3 күн бұрын
No
@muhammadishaq5613 күн бұрын
Bad news for India Pakistan has signed as many as 82 Memoranda of Understanding (MoUs) with friendly countries to export defence products and equipment including advanced drones, fighter jets, commercial and logistic ships, electronic warfare equipment and radars worth US$30 billion. The agreements were concluded during the four-day International Defence Exhibition and Seminar (IDEAS 2024) 😊😂😂
@shankarnarayanbharati52673 күн бұрын
Congratulations! Hope tera P.M. aur Teri Qaum ab kahi bhi bhikh mangne nahi jayenge😝
@AbinashMalana2 күн бұрын
😂😂😂 That's why education is important Half knowledge is very dangerous
@dhurandharsingh60913 күн бұрын
ब्रिटेन कि ऐसी हालत देखकर दिल को बड़ा सुकुन मिलता है। लुटेरे कभी खुश नही रह सकते।
@rajeshshaw66493 күн бұрын
If it's sold at a discount with f35 India can buy it and perform the necessary modifications it will be a good deal
@mth4693 күн бұрын
❌ buying junk
@rajeshshaw66493 күн бұрын
For you, it may seem like junk, but for defense enthusiasts, it represents an asset. Along with the aircraft carrier, we will receive the F-35, which will allow us to learn about fifth-generation naval aircraft. This knowledge will benefit our future programs. Additionally, we will modify the aircraft carrier to suit our specific needs.
@sauravghosh70643 күн бұрын
Discount mein F35 😂😂😂😂 American won't let it happen
@mth4693 күн бұрын
@@rajeshshaw6649 don't be naive. what will be offloaded on India is junk + huge liabilities.
@sanghipranit3 күн бұрын
5:30 UK will never sell their "Prince of wales" or "Queen Elizabeth" to India. They might sell them to someone else but never to India. Their Pride wont let them do it.
@shankarnarayanbharati52673 күн бұрын
Humare Vikrant aur Viraat dono carriers 2nd hand British carriers the😌
@shubhmishra69772 күн бұрын
@@shankarnarayanbharati5267Tab samay alag tha abhi hum log khud ka aircraft carrier bana sakte hain
@-Blue-_3 күн бұрын
Aur yaha ke kuch log aur bahar ke log kehte hai ki Indian navy equip nahi hai aur trained nahi hai
@ManishSingh-xo1fb3 күн бұрын
Ye sari comment me Indian shortcut marne wala opinion hai. Aircraft carriers are useful and a necessity but they don't work alone. They have multiple other ships working with them in tandem. So if you build one aircraft carrier and don't invest in building those other ships which can do cyber Warfare, missile defense, which have icbms and topedos, another having SAMs and Radars... Plus a host of other fighting vehicles along with anti submarine Warfare suite..... Your don't actually have an aircraft carrier. You just have a floating island. But if you already operate a large navy, add an aircraft carrier to the group, and create a potent strike group, and you see your naval prowess go up.
@abhijeetmahajan60573 күн бұрын
They should sell these cariers to US navy.with proper modification they can use it effectively
@amitbhau3 күн бұрын
3500 रुपये प्रति टन के हिसाब से मिलेगा तो भारत ने खरीद लेना चाहिये
@sandeshm96003 күн бұрын
Catamaran type of hull designed catobar deck type aircraft carriers is required for Indian naval service tricommand with amphibious capabilities.
@sud46863 күн бұрын
What about Indian new aircraft carrier order
@RudraPatel-wk6je3 күн бұрын
Financial negotiation me hai
@v.a.d17843 күн бұрын
🔴What happened to indias helicopter carrier projects ?
@james4807M3 күн бұрын
Limited usability. So not cost effective
@marcd51963 күн бұрын
delayed. hopefully will be sanctioned by 2026 and we would have them by mid 2030s.
@EsportsSchool3 күн бұрын
ऐसी बचत किस काम की... जिससे भट्टा ही बैठ जाये। 🤣🤣🤣
@jddas91553 күн бұрын
Atleast kuznetsov still given service in initial years compare to glorified british kuznetsov
@CatOfCulture3 күн бұрын
Damn, they used to have the best Navy in the world once, and now it's lame asf. With Trump looking like he'll be pulling military support out of NATO, is it not a good opportunity for India to take that chance and work with European countries like Britain?
@-Blue-_3 күн бұрын
Britain ek bohot hi bekar desh hai isse acha France hai aur sath mai Britain ke log abhi bhi bohot proud karte hai British empire par to aise logo se kuch trade karo hi mat vo bada acha rahega aur khud ko abhi bhi superior samajhte hai
@CatOfCulture3 күн бұрын
@@-Blue-_ That's the most senseless thing I've read today, wtf. Imagine thinking that the entire population of a country is a monolith and shares the same opinions. Do you even know that a large chunk of the British population hates the crown? Having your tax money go to a family of freeloaders isn't something citizens enjoy. Anyways, Britain themselves have been willing to cooperate with India militarily. I think this is an opportunity we should capitalize on.
@-Blue-_3 күн бұрын
@@CatOfCulture bilkul nahi Britain jaisi bekar country ke sath to trade bilkul bhi nahi karna chaiye, ek to loot kar gaye aur uper se superiority complex bhi in logo mai bohot hai, aisi country se to India ko bohot hi durr rehna chaiye best alternative France hai
@-Blue-_3 күн бұрын
@@CatOfCulture and most of the people from from Britain are like this
@anubratadas49113 күн бұрын
There are reports that Prince of Wales might be sold. If true we should buy it.
@Chinathebapoflindustan3 күн бұрын
no China should buy it😁😁
@mth4693 күн бұрын
buying badly designed junk is not a good idea if the creators are themselves struggling to keep it running.
@RaptorsParadise3 күн бұрын
Instead they should have gone with conventional submarines which would be a better option 😂😂😂😂
@Pollenyunzi3 күн бұрын
Kya kare kangali ka darr chal Raha hai 😂😂😂
@rajivyadavworkouts94783 күн бұрын
भाई जेम्स बॉन्ड किस दिन काम आएगा
@ShahzaibButt-d1z3 күн бұрын
Ideas 2024 per be video bano or jf 17 ky radar per be propyganda matrix 😂😂
@sigma-sigma13 күн бұрын
@ defence matrix Just because these aircraft carriers are not installed with surface to air missiles hence can be sunk easily would not be accurate, an aircraft carrier does not operate in isolation and they work in carrier groups where there are carrier escort ships which carry significant surface to air/air defence capabilities.
@sigma-sigma13 күн бұрын
Never the less on board carrier surface to air missiles capabilities would definitely be an important capability without which carrier would be handicapped in case if it is isolated.
@Vartik-jr4qr3 күн бұрын
We can get SAM but intercepting supersonic and hypersonic missiles is just....
@hiteshadhikari3 күн бұрын
At no point should india even consider buying this ac It not only requires a lot of money to buy and operate let alone convert to catobar, it also has several mechanical and reliability issues which have persisted despite several repairs and no one can guarantee that these issues will not reoccur later
@HamidAli-h8e3 күн бұрын
As physics teacher and student i think that Aircarft carriers are not good against good Air power . one can easily hit them
@Cryspio3 күн бұрын
Carrier is a power projection tool
@HamidAli-h8e3 күн бұрын
@Cryspio billions of dollars only for power projection
@anubratadas49113 күн бұрын
@@HamidAli-h8e you are not a military expert so you will not understand importance of aircraft carriers.
@HamidAli-h8e3 күн бұрын
@anubratadas4911 yes i am not but Americans not using their carriers even against rebels in Gulf
@anubratadas49113 күн бұрын
@@HamidAli-h8e USS Dwight D Eisenhower is there.
@mintdel3333 күн бұрын
It's uk problem not yours
@sauravghosh70643 күн бұрын
Uk k aircraft carriers harrier ko dekh kar bana gaya hai
@yashansh83173 күн бұрын
Can u please make a video if india. Buy this aircraft carriers and convert it in catobar carrier
@EsportsSchool3 күн бұрын
Prince and Queen... Both are problem for UK
@jainswarankit3 күн бұрын
100(सौ) ek rupye mai khareed lena chaahiye Bharat ko ye aircraft carrier!!!! Britain ko salary ke liye paise bhi mil jaayenge or Bharat ka time bach jaayega aircraft carrier banane mai!!!
@walkspiritually3 күн бұрын
We should offer a cheaper price.
@ameyajadhav76343 күн бұрын
If we buy from them it will be costly as they will not sell it with full capabilities they will mess up
@onlinetricksandtips96133 күн бұрын
What is your favourite fighter aircraft? My favourite is F-18C
@ndeepanshu65413 күн бұрын
F15 EX.
@SomarcoSSJDieyoung3 күн бұрын
Rafael
@CatOfCulture3 күн бұрын
F22, Su57 both look sexy as hell. The Rafale as well
@Ironhide2343 күн бұрын
Par hum kya karenge kal ko ye beech paani pe band pad jaye jaise ye haar baar ka hai iska
@K-SHABAB3 күн бұрын
bravo China
@AnirbanSarkar2033 күн бұрын
Bro, on what missile is the PG-LRSAM based on ?
@nasad923 күн бұрын
No more aircraft carriers from the Brits. Nice ad but.
@fahad-zd8lf3 күн бұрын
Pak ke pfx fighter pe video banao
@Breath3003 күн бұрын
Lol 😂who cares cause Pakistan always makes faulty equipment
@theintrovert8943 күн бұрын
kuch nhi hai J20 + su57+ Tempest = PFX ... just check its design
@avghindu3 күн бұрын
😂
@muhtadaali88473 күн бұрын
Yaar tum logo mai akal nahi. Har jet same he dikhega @@theintrovert894
@LMessii103 күн бұрын
😂😂😂
@mave463 күн бұрын
Although these r brand new aircraft carrier
@JASHVEER223 күн бұрын
I hope some genius officials in Indian navy does not come with the idea to buy this shit😅
@KRawatXP20033 күн бұрын
Acquire it to do experiments?
@sseries62363 күн бұрын
Pakistan china Kay 2 full squard test and trail Kar rahay Hain aircraft carrier destroyers Kay liye 5 years hogaye difrent air to sea missile Kay test on going Hain
@harshitdwivedi14353 күн бұрын
But hum uk ke bare me kyu baat kar rahe hai ?
@lavishbansal18233 күн бұрын
If we buy this carrier then how we developed a capability to developed this giant carrier and I don't think we have that financial power that we buy this and also work on our own program.
@Avtr33 күн бұрын
The whole video was good untill bro proposed that India should buy that crap/white elephant.
@sanket29233 күн бұрын
UK IS NOT IDIOT.THEY WILL FACE PROBLEM AND THEY HAVE WILL TO SOLVE IT.
@marcd51963 күн бұрын
actually they are idiots.
@RohitRaj_09113 күн бұрын
The Article that you've mentioned Is very Misleading 😅. Sure it Do not Have Any Property Surface To Air Missiles, But The Carrier is Never alone, It is always accompanied by a Group, and their soul purpose is to Defend the Carrier . They have all the Types of Soft and Hard kill measures to defend against any attack. You're Knowledgeable enough to realise that except for the New Lott of American super Carriers no aircraft Carrier would be able to Defend Itself Alone. Brits never plan to operate the Carrier Alone hence They skipped Surface to Air Capability. The Displacement is not again as much. And Talking About Issues... Almost All carriers around the Globe keep facing Issues of Some Or Other Sort . The Article is Biased in One way , Hence It Totally missed the Pros and Reasons to miss out on things it does.
@shubhampandey94973 күн бұрын
Englishmen are good in making English truffle only 🍰😂😂
@themoviethriller37963 күн бұрын
1st to comment 😂😂😂😂
@sobanidrees29992 күн бұрын
Tm logo ki stories btana choro phly to Sirf Air force h world famous thi crashes k liye ab is naik kam me tmhari Navy b shamil ho gai hw kal ki incident pe bat q nai krty bhrway k Submarine fishing boat se takra gai hw
@prashanthds77893 күн бұрын
No need to help.UK by buying their problematic carrier. We have our own. Let us spend our money on our MIC.
@randombully37983 күн бұрын
Df 17 is only land capable yet. China is working df 27, anti ship capable version of df 17, with it's first successful test in 2023, but not in service yet. Currently the only hypersonic anti ship capability china has is ballistic missile with Marv.
@kushagravlogs56273 күн бұрын
Yf 21 is anti ship missilw
@MuhammadSufiyan-q9m3 күн бұрын
Sar plz sar what about Indian submarine collision with fisher boat 😂😂 Vary professional sar Pull sapport to izrael sar
@anubratadas49113 күн бұрын
That Submarine is perfectly fine you expect a wooden boat to damage a Submarine. 😂
@JK-fq1lx3 күн бұрын
Both these Aircraft carriers performance specially the Prince of wales are so bad that who ever will try to operate will curse their fortune. Indians are not mad to purchase a highly defective white elephant. We can build IAC II, Sister of Vikrant within 5-7 years & another dry dockyard for more than 70,000 Ton ship is near completion, in one of our Govt. owned Ship building facility, which have plenty of experience in this field. Then why India should go for a lame duck like this.
@IamSuperman1543 күн бұрын
Someone once said that we should watch out for UK Aircraft Carrier when they will be selling this kabada.
@abhijeetmahajan60573 күн бұрын
Poor planning
@knowledged84203 күн бұрын
India just ekk aircraft carriers bonaya hai oh bhi Russia ke design che or helpche so uk ka aircraft carriers che bhi komjur hai phir bhi batu mae India aircraft carriers powerful sala koi kobra bejta hai India ka hat pohuste hi suna bon jata hai
@prashanthb65213 күн бұрын
India should buy both of their Aircraft carriers at a bargain price. I dont think UK requires any of them for a foreseeable future.
@marcd51963 күн бұрын
2 white elephants. it will take BILLIONS of Dollars to modify them in CATOBAR Carriers, rectify all issues and add Air defence.
@prashanthb65213 күн бұрын
@@marcd5196 Indians are known for bargaining hard.
@Shan-sg7mm3 күн бұрын
🤣🤣🤣
@muhammadishaq5613 күн бұрын
Bad news for India: According to Turkey’s Anadolu news agency: Turkish defense company Repkon signed an agreement with Pakistan’s Wah Industries Limited (WIL) to develop a production and filling line for 155 mm artillery shell bodies, with an annual capacity of 120,000 units.
@abhiseksahu13553 күн бұрын
England = worst reliability engineering ✔️✔️
@Xhydraulics2 күн бұрын
You are wrong my friend. Even ejection seat of tejas is British
@nishantshrivastava9674Күн бұрын
pagal h kya
@mayureshrasam17083 күн бұрын
I heard many people questioned why UK wanted carrier...and even why Russia is desperate to keep their one carrier afloat....i once read and article about the countries...applying for permanent seat in UN and i saw Aircraft carrier as one of the check box....i guess that is the reason they are so desperate to keep it.
@ndeepanshu65413 күн бұрын
Aircraft carrier are not ships but 50000 tonne of diplomacy on the go.
@Vartik-jr4qr3 күн бұрын
China is already a part of UN permanent council since decades without aircraft carrier 😂 there is no such rule. Russia keep it to train navy pilots. They don't want to lose "naval pilot" Capability
@mayureshrasam17083 күн бұрын
@@Vartik-jr4qr China already had seat in UN it belonged to Republic of China ( taiwan) in 70s it was given to PRC...
@alfazalfoods27453 күн бұрын
Indian navy sub collide with fishing ship . Always a proffestional navy
@HardeepSingh-bh7zw3 күн бұрын
Jai Modiji Jai BJP Jai Ramrajya
@shubhampandey66683 күн бұрын
Kya comment karu😂
@ranahassan7963 күн бұрын
Uk brothersss ye hamy gift kar do pakistan uk brothersess zindabad
@Victory-m9d2 күн бұрын
Bhai khud se bhi bana lo kuch hamesha mangte hi rahoge kiya ?