⚙ Want to know more about the latest tech and innovations? Don’t Miss Out! *SUBSCRIBE & HIT THE BELL* 👉bit.ly/SubscribeNowIE
@notimportant81202 жыл бұрын
It’s starting to look like the top-down shooter games we had back in the 80s-90s, you gain additional wingmen with the power ups you collect
@RickyDownhillRDH2 жыл бұрын
Can you imagine the kinds of maneuvering and G-Forces these future planes will be able to demonstrate without a pilot?
@cortney32802 жыл бұрын
Well USA has that already
@cortney32802 жыл бұрын
They got phantoms and f16 without pilots
@RickyDownhillRDH2 жыл бұрын
@@cortney3280 Nah man. I mean in 10 or 20 years. 👍🏼
@benz90632 жыл бұрын
NGAD is meant to do that.
@NineSeptims2 жыл бұрын
@Lasha Japaridze yup dogfight capability isnt important anymore. modern air to air missiles made that rare and they teach you to let off missiles and run.
@grey51352 жыл бұрын
You could have guessed that that was a Boeing product without being told it's got their look for sure. It's kind of cool to see the design language between manufacturers a lot like automakers have their unique design language.
@L33tSkE3t2 жыл бұрын
Yea, I can see that. It Kind of looks like the BOEING YF-32 prototype, their Phantom UAV, MQ-25 Stingray UAV, and the Loyal Wingman variant
@harryhatter29622 жыл бұрын
Actually Grey is was fully designed , engineered and manufactured in Australia and had absolutely NO US input so what you say is rubbish!
@SuperCatacata2 жыл бұрын
@@harryhatter2962 Does where it was designed or manufactured matter? It's still made by Boeing. Made completely using techniques they have pioneered. And with their complete oversight. Stop being dumb. If you think this joint effort had 0 input or help from Boeing you are lost. Teslas manufactured in China aren't made with 0 input from Tesla. They aren't viewed as Chinese cars either. They are still Teslas. Where they are made or designed doesn't change whos responsible for it being made. And who's emblem goes on it because it is their product.
@alpacaofthemountain8760 Жыл бұрын
True
@alpacaofthemountain8760 Жыл бұрын
source? @@harryhatter2962
@johnwatson80042 жыл бұрын
I love it when you have a good line coach, offensive coach each doing their own job.
@mrwatcherofmovies2 жыл бұрын
Ghost Bat + Wing Man = Bat Man
@hifinsword10 ай бұрын
Where does that leave Robin? 😄
@IC3XR9 күн бұрын
Funnily enough there is a town in Australia named "Batman".
@mostlymessingabout2 жыл бұрын
I’m looking forward to the Ding Bat
@DansModelBench2 жыл бұрын
lol. That would be the pilot in the manned aircraft flying with it.
@rogerwilco59182 жыл бұрын
@@larrysmith2485 yeah, but the last guy made him look like Einstein.. The dingbat sounds like something like space cadets would use in "space force". Remember when the reality star repackaged and rebranded Air Force space command, like it was a frozen steak or a cheap vodka, then he acted like he came up with some whole new concept?
@spartancrown2 жыл бұрын
@@rogerwilco5918 I remember when for the first time in decades he didn’t start a foreign conflict somewhere and was bringing troops out of conflict zones along with calling others like China and NATO allies on their bullshit and again after decades of no progress got the Abraham accords done for Israel. There isn’t a single accomplishment you can name worth anything that supposed Einstein has accomplished in his decades long membership of the political elite class.
@rogerwilco59182 жыл бұрын
@@spartancrown I guess it's quite impressive that Trump didn't start any War considering he's a Republican. Remember the time he assassinated the vice president of iran?
@rogerwilco59182 жыл бұрын
@@spartancrown do you think things would have gone differently in Afghanistan if Trump hadn't withdrawn all the combat forces and surrendered to the taliban?
@Playtime-lu8wj2 жыл бұрын
The secretive AI control being developed by the Australians is the key to the MQ-28 Ghost Bat.
@timn68642 жыл бұрын
The idea isn't to develop a fighter drone to mirror the capability of a piloted aircraft. Imagine them more as a stealthy drone which can triangulate over-the-horizon weapons. A pilot can fire and forget.. then move to other targets while the bat guides it beyond any radar reach.
@alpacaofthemountain8760 Жыл бұрын
Thanks
@ianrobinson89742 жыл бұрын
12/07/2022 EXCELLANT. The Australian aviation industry has been in the forefront of innovation for a long time. A UAV was developed and used years and years ago with the name of Jindivik, an Indigenous name, but I cannot remembe its' English translation. They were used as a target UAV before uav's were known as such. Keep up the good work MATES! Boeing is now involved as we do not have our own aircraft manufacturer and longer. CAC brough out by Boeing?
@koalaseatleaves12772 жыл бұрын
It apparently means "The Hunted One"
@williamhardes80812 жыл бұрын
good old Aussie innovation again!
@yeoshenghong48022 жыл бұрын
What it main purpose to take hit for the pilot aircraft? Or to have jamming system or search radar or carry additional AMRAM ?
@aldisozols25222 жыл бұрын
@@yeoshenghong4802 The Jindivik was a target drone, used to train pilots in gunnery. It wasn't meant for combat. It was built in the early 1950s, so was fairly advanced at the time.
@nedkelly96882 жыл бұрын
Go research Australian Hypersonic drone first flight should be next year. Using the Spartan Australian scramjet that records state by company it was used in all HIFIRE Hypersonic tests and built around Ray Stalkers designs. World's fastest scramjet at Mach 12 and first 3D printed one.
@RachelBaylesLacey2 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@mick202272 жыл бұрын
It's good to see we are stepping up to the challenges of the future! Although six really isn't going to be enough surely! Good video!
@nedkelly96882 жыл бұрын
only six until tests are conducted and if sucessful then would buy more. Australia is going more in to AI drones.. even getting AI drone submarines now too. A Aussie comapny is building a Hypersonic drone now also using a Australian scramjet that they claim is fastest and most advanced in the world, say can control it's speed back and forth and can turn it on and off during flight so can travel further. say it's been in HIFIRE tests and i guess has if are putting it in a drone as rocket tests would of been done first.
@rebelrob9637 Жыл бұрын
The pentagon has requested the technology so they can test it and possibly implement it into their programs. They have done the same with the Ghost bat. They want some of their own.
@jorgeasperaАй бұрын
@@rebelrob9637we have the Valkyrie and with out boing you would not have anything trust voting is American even boing Austria the just have a boing out there to produce the f16 in your country but at the end boing is American and it’s technology if you where so advanced wouldn’t you have a attack helicopter or a jet like Korea Japan
@smeary10 Жыл бұрын
It'll have swappable modular nose sections that will enable Ghost Bat to do recon, search & rescue, air to air, air to ground, CAS, anti-radar, and electronic spectrum jamming. So a single manned parent aircraft will be able to have a squadron of Ghost Bats flying with it, all with differing nose cones allowing each one to perform a different mission profile on the same mission. The fact that it's extremely stealthy and very fast, and the fact that it's already test flown and that there are a number actually built and testing makes the Ghost Bat the most advanced UAV in the world with its capabilities. Nothing else on the drawing board or operational is this far down the track with these capabilities and perfomance. These will only be made available to close allies.
@kcdiazWTV2 жыл бұрын
Pilot to Ghost Bat: You can be my wingman anytime. Ghost Bat to pilot: Beep bop beep bop.
@タコの王2 жыл бұрын
Currently a research project, but in the future it will provide air to air, air to ground and surveillance at less than ~10% the cost of a F-35. They can be produced quickly so you don't need to keep a large quantity in storage.
@MrNightroder012 жыл бұрын
you wouldn't know if they are in service doing these missions now.
@cosmoray97502 жыл бұрын
war of propaganda’: John Pilger on.... kzbin.info/www/bejne/q2rTdqKqq9GKY9U share.....
@Smokeyr672 жыл бұрын
@@MrNightroder01 There’s only a few in the air at the moment, being tested out of Amberley (with the Growlers).
@typeins2 жыл бұрын
@@Smokeyr67 yeah but you don’t know and nobody of us hopefully will ever know how much they really build from that or already have from future airplanes hiding until they need them in a real conflict
@nedkelly96882 жыл бұрын
@@typeins Australian company and Defence are building a Hypersonic drone with Australias scramjet and they state it's been used in secret tests and is worlds fastest and most advanced in the world. This scramjet been in HIFIRE tests
@peterdwyer46092 жыл бұрын
Us ozzies have a high engineering standard, and we do more than most realise,,
@ThomasWLalor2 жыл бұрын
You make an iconic slouch hat, too
@nedkelly96882 жыл бұрын
Australia is actually a world leader in Hypersonics also.. Australian company claims have the most advanced scramjet in the world and has been used in Australia Hypersonic secret tests, anyway they are building a drone and it's first flight will be next year. world's fastest at Mach 12 also. Australian defence has been behind it all the way and was built off Ray Stalkers designs.
@jorgeasperaАй бұрын
Oh really so why no attack helicopter or there own jet the the USA lets boing be in Australia to make the f16 and no submarine that’s why we giving you free technology 😂😂
@jorgeasperaАй бұрын
@@nedkelly9688yea that why you have no attack helicopter or your own jet the only reason boing is over there is no competition and to make the f16 Korea has a jet Japan has one and u guys so behind we giving you free sub technology
@bigman23DOTS2 жыл бұрын
Would be quite significant to be armed internally with a long range anti ship missile and linked to naval vessels in particular the rather naked arufura opvs
@johnmay60902 жыл бұрын
It's the R double A F.
@BS-vm5bt Жыл бұрын
Now with airbus vs boeing again. Will be interesting to see what differences there will be between NGAD, FCAS and Tempest. Though it is a possibility that Tempest and FCAS merge since we both develop drones that are compatible with each other. Fun to see the old rivalry continue from the civil aviation market to the military domain. Will be interesting what the differences will be between each 6th gen programs capabilities.
@mitchellbutler706811 ай бұрын
Yes impressive, it wont be long till they teach missiles to see the difference in shape between a ghost bat and an F-35 . Heat seeking is the main structure now but with this tech there will be upgrades made to combat it . I think these kind of innovations will have to eventually mimic size and scale of the aircraft they shadow . Brilliant technology
@yellowgold43662 жыл бұрын
Humans, a creation ourselves, create creations that imitate creations made by the ultimate creator.
@christopherhiggins82382 жыл бұрын
The SKYNET Air Force begins... hehe But on a serious note that is cool as hell.
@aatkarelse82182 жыл бұрын
Even the most boring version of this concept has great potential: as an carrier of extra ordinance, having a radar on board so the human pilots are not spotted, as decoys.
@TheMilpitasguy2 жыл бұрын
Interesting concept. I knew about the Valkyrie stealth drones as loyal wingmen for the F-35A, just had not thought about them serving as loyal wingmen for E-3 Sentry AWACS as well, negating the need for fighter escorts when they're operating alone. China has made boastful claims about using J-20s as AWACS-killers and midair-refueler-killers before.
@brianjob30182 жыл бұрын
Well-written, friend. Referring to the US, I want to be a stickler and ask isn't something like the E-8 replacing the old E-3? It's also interesting that the profile showed a two-engined AWACS with other than a radome that Australia is using.
@AusExplorer2 жыл бұрын
@@brianjob3018 Its called the E-7 Wedgetail. www.airforce.gov.au/technology/aircraft/intelligence-surveillance-and-reconnaissance/e-7a-wedgetail Now operated in by 4 countries and the USA will be replacing their E-3s with it in the next few years. The U.S. Air Force said the E-7 "is the only platform capable of meeting the requirements for the Defense Department’s tactical battle management, command and control and moving target indication capabilities within the time-frame needed to replace the aging E-3.”
@brianjob30182 жыл бұрын
@@AusExplorer How is the West going to keep our orbiting "ducks" out of enemy fighter missile range, which is around 100 miles now, and protect against hypersonics, big naval SAMs and other long-rangers?
@politenessman39012 жыл бұрын
@@brianjob3018 Yes, the US is procuring Wedgetail, if their procurement system as a bit less arthritic they could take advantage of the many pristine B737s looking for new homes because of the aviation downturn from covid and the fuel price spike.
@hifinsword10 ай бұрын
@@politenessman3901 The only airframe the USAF would ever update is the B-52 Buff. Saving money on a used 737 would be an anathema to the USAF. Between the top brass of the USAF and congress members, it's all about spending BIG BUCKS in a congress person's district, not saving $$$.
@DMulabiTalejan2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this. What is 'SINGLE COMPOSITE PIECE"? Is this like no joined up parts for the entire thing? Does this mean it was 3D printed?
@goodshipkaraboudjan2 жыл бұрын
Sort of David, it means that there was no need for load bearing bulkheads or such. Meaning it's extremely lightweight, the piece is essentially carbon fiber - like an F1 car chassis.
@sporehux834411 ай бұрын
"Operationally useful dive" ? 4:40 , what a fancy way to say Kamikaze action
@WhoThisMonkey Жыл бұрын
Have one large mothership plane, and many drones orbiting it, they can work as countermeasures and payload distribution.
@badmarshmallow92112 жыл бұрын
I’m in the Australian Air Force Cadets and we learn about this drone in our squadron bc some of us will eventually be flying alongside this thing. In the future, we learnt that RAAF pilots will act more like mobile command centres that give out orders and info to the drones and they will protect the human pilots. It’s kinda cool but idk what they’ll be about to do about protecting human pilots from long range hypersonic missiles like the Russian R-37. In my opinion human pilots aren’t going to be used for combat missions in the future but logistical missions instead. Idk tho. Curious to know what u guys think.
@goodshipkaraboudjan2 жыл бұрын
AAFC, so you don't get given much info. Just look forward to bivouacs and learning how to march. If you join the RAAF don't expect to be straight into unmanned gear.
@badmarshmallow92112 жыл бұрын
@@goodshipkaraboudjan Ik, I’m not really planning to join the RAAF and I know that drones won’t be running SEAD or anything like that overnight. I just think that it’s cool that some of the people I know might get the chance to fly alongside a drone.
@williamwhitney52662 жыл бұрын
USA has the White Bat Auss my good friends now have the Ghost Bat Hell Yeah
@Giveme1goodreason Жыл бұрын
Man I’m so excited for this to be paired with USA F35 and of course your next Gen stuff.
@Larsbor11 ай бұрын
So is it suppose to be controlled with bluetooth?
@aa23392 жыл бұрын
It can be the disposable point man as well.
@quecksilber45711 ай бұрын
Dang, Oswald Boelke. I served at Jagdbombergeschwader 31 "Boelke" now called Taktisches Luftwaffengeschwader 31 "Boelke".
@fredsmith22772 жыл бұрын
i find it strange australia is developing this device , i did not think we had the capability ?
@MattWeberWA2 жыл бұрын
It's a combination of partnering with and gaining expertise from Boeing and a shitload of latent capacity inherent in any well educated first world economy. Australia has the money and educated workforce to do pretty much anything we want to with a couple of very specific exceptions (nuclear being the big one). We just don't often choose to on a large scale because it's often more economical to buy from overseas where there are established supply chains and larger (often lower cost) workforces. It's perhaps telling that this is the time the government decided we needed to bring some combat aviation manufacturing capabilities on shore. See also the plan to make missiles domestically. They're (not improperly) nervous about strategic autonomy.
@antbra32622 жыл бұрын
With it part of NATO they can do anything
@Geebax22 жыл бұрын
We built the Jindivick remote pilotless aircraft long before the US even had one.
@disposabull2 жыл бұрын
@@MattWeberWA Much smaller and dumber countries have gone nuclear, it is not difficult. Politics prevent that from happening not money or education.
@MattWeberWA2 жыл бұрын
@@disposabull Don't misunderstand, I don't think we can't do it in principle. We just don't have the industry here, thus we don't really have a very large base of appropriately educated workforce, so spooling up any kind of nuclear industry would take a very long time. AUKUS sub programme might help a little with that, but not so much as we're not building or even refuelling the reactors locally.
@lingth2 жыл бұрын
Hmm so in the near future it will have combat abilities? So late.. how about a version of the Ghost Bat that can also auto refuel midair with tankers.
@artkingofwholefoods742 жыл бұрын
That looks like the Phoenix from G Force!
@MrSimonw582 жыл бұрын
In Australia it's the Wom bat
@ianlowery60142 жыл бұрын
A Bomb What?
@HarryCriswell-pz1rm Жыл бұрын
Nice!!!!......
@techkid18332 жыл бұрын
Okay ghost 🦇🦇🦇🦇🦇🦇🦇🦇🦇👀
@leslienordman87182 жыл бұрын
_Very_ Interesting! :-)
@Zetraxes2 жыл бұрын
did they say it is made out of resin?
@hdmccart67352 жыл бұрын
Resin infused composite materials. Like an F1 car.
@nealrcn2 жыл бұрын
I do not understand why it does not fly supersonic. I know dog fighting is generally done below the speed of sound, Fighters go fast to get into or leave the fight if the wingman cannot keep up that is a problem.
@forgivemenot12 жыл бұрын
Cost, you need more powerful engines and more fuel which means a bigger more expensive aircraft, the advantage of these aircraft is they are expendable in operations, for example say two of these were with a live pilot he could send them ahead into a situation that would mean them getting shot down in the process of completing the mission which is a much more acceptable loss than a very high cost aircraft and pilot.
@peterweller85832 жыл бұрын
There is a lot of potential in UCAV's One I am sure has been decided by more countries than mentioned.
@gfy692 жыл бұрын
The 1st option, wow...
@stephenstalking214911 ай бұрын
Are the doors fully bolted?
@hifinsword10 ай бұрын
That would be the Lockheed version, not the Boeing version! 😀
@alexanderbonardi45142 жыл бұрын
Calling it "Loyal" would imply disloyalty by the previous wingmen....just saying 😏
@rogerwilco59182 жыл бұрын
Don't You remember When Maverick left Cougar's wing to showboat with the mig? I don't think cougar was "doing just fine on his own", but Maverick still left him..
@yhird2 жыл бұрын
Exactly. Well said.
@Dude408f2 жыл бұрын
A NK hacker could make it disloyal
@JohnDoe-fn6zd2 жыл бұрын
One time, there was a movie of one UAV, pilot by AI flying with 3 aircrafts with human pilots, AI pilot tech is so advance it can do better than human pilot.. Now. It is a reality... Wow
@DJ7040410 ай бұрын
Wow... we have a whole 3 of em. Do we even have 3 yet?
@robman209510 ай бұрын
Do you know anything about how aircraft are developed?
@DJ7040410 ай бұрын
@@robman2095 I know a little bit.
@donpierce4829 Жыл бұрын
The US Navy and AF is going to order quite a few. What's really unique is they have interchangeable front noses that can be changed for different missions!!
@unkn0wnv1rus32 жыл бұрын
While it is very cool, it is kinda scary to think that fleets of these aircraft can being controlled by a rogue AI in the future.
@Dude408f2 жыл бұрын
1. That idea lacks originality. 2. Controlling a fleet would require purpose. To have an AI with purpose of it's own and that purpose to be nefarius will require much time, IMHO. 3. A state or some terrorists would try to hack and control a fleet of drones MUCH sooner. Therefore, I think you should worry about that more than worrying about an evil AI
@311Bob Жыл бұрын
Whats their purpose again? A missile sponge? I think it would be cheaper to trail decoys behind the jet than this thing. Arm it with extra aa missiles and you have it but supper stealth it and let it fly way behind or way out front and things get interesting
@starman43462 жыл бұрын
we gotta pull a F22 move and give this to nobody
@calebmurphy73432 жыл бұрын
Wondering how long it will take China to pirate the shit out of it 🤷♂️
@seanavp2 жыл бұрын
*But, you do have the F-35.*
@marrqi7wini542 жыл бұрын
Besides everyone else is already starting to implement such drones. Plus this is under Boeing, the US can definitely get this drone or something better if it wishes.
@stevebell72882 жыл бұрын
We’re committed to AUKUS so it’ll be give and take if all three are to benefit
@tonyklymson80962 жыл бұрын
The Chinese knock off could be your Ding Bat .
@YouTube_user33332 жыл бұрын
Aerospace uses metric Australia uses metric This aircraft was built with metric Rest of the world uses metric Americans: I’m not using those commie units 🙄
@petersinclair3997 Жыл бұрын
Believe one goal is to mass produce the Ghost Bat at a cost of AUD 2 million per unit, and to AI controlled swarms.
@rebelrob9637 Жыл бұрын
The US wants them now too. To integrate into their NGAD program and fly alongside their 6th gen fighter which will replace the F22.
@FaithfulFumoFan23 Жыл бұрын
The future is now!
@buzzmeanytime10 ай бұрын
We’ll see.
@constructiongabay46092 жыл бұрын
Eddie is going to be real in 10 years.
@tinaliebe51182 жыл бұрын
That’s if we don’t scrap it first 😁😁😁🇦🇺
@cab62732 жыл бұрын
This is the future
@downundergarage696811 ай бұрын
love how they are using cheapo Bunnings drill tool.. hope the wingman does not fall apart after 2 years..
@moodhot2 жыл бұрын
Skynet already in development
@jonathanmeisman57942 жыл бұрын
1:33 a Ryobi drill?!?!? On a multi million aircraft?
@zelious94642 жыл бұрын
Can't get much more Australian than doing something important with a $50 Ryobi drill from Bunnings XD
@Depresdude9 ай бұрын
If it's a ucav wingman but there is no man controlling it.. then it's a wing?
@Tribune1232 жыл бұрын
The future is One pilot in One Powerful, direct trajectory Jet (The center), surrounded by Several autonomous wing men (The Flanks). The Ancient world meets the future.
@Dude408f2 жыл бұрын
That configuration could be weaker than a pack of aircrafts that are more interchangeable
@lookupthereupinthetrees98605 ай бұрын
No doubt these things could be used as long range anti-shipping cruise missiles if the need arose.
@adamwest113810 ай бұрын
As an Airport Inspector- WHY DO YOU HAVE TOUCHDOWN MARKERS THE WHOLE WAY DOWN YOUR CGI RUNWAY. It hurts my eyes @5:23
@necronlord52 Жыл бұрын
Oh, God of the Machine, accept those sacred oils! It's only me who sees those red ribbons? They are the Seals of Purity!
@dezent10 ай бұрын
Wonder what amazing name it will get when someone realize Boeing forgot to screw down the hatches.
@WANDERER69H8 Жыл бұрын
❤
@animalanimal79392 жыл бұрын
What about space ghost
@ianlowery60142 жыл бұрын
Whither goest thou?
@TheGito4132 жыл бұрын
That's Eddie, he killed Jaime Fox in Stealth.
@rickyboy52747 ай бұрын
IT'S A DUD !!!
@Giveme1goodreason Жыл бұрын
Man I’m so excited for this to be aligned with the F35. But imagine what it’ll do with the USA 6th generation planes. It and other will make Russia’s and china’s airforces redundant.
Uk should had not cancelled it loyal wingman project
@smeary102 жыл бұрын
Mate, Britain should never have cancelled the TSR project. That's where the world leading British aviation industry began to collapse.
@mariano76992 жыл бұрын
@@smeary10 : US ☠️pirates☠️ are subliminally exploiting British slavery
@forgivemenot12 жыл бұрын
That's the purpose of AUKUS so the the US and UK and Australia can pool recourses and share technology benefiting everyone.
@marrqi7wini542 жыл бұрын
@@forgivemenot1 Australia is apart of the commonwealth right? Shouldn't the UK (Along with Canada and others.) have some access to this if this turns out to be quite valuable?
@forgivemenot12 жыл бұрын
@@marrqi7wini54 The Commonwealth isn't a security arrangement so no. AUKAS is a trilateral security agreement between Australia, UK and USA and under that agreement there is a raft of measures including technology sharing in specific domains such as missile technology cybersecurity and nuclear submarines. Other country's might join but I would think Japan would be ahead of Canada.
@biswajitbhattavharjya21158 ай бұрын
Technology?
@johnbrown618910 ай бұрын
Would you want a Boeing product as your wing man?
@joelhungerford83882 жыл бұрын
In Australia a wingman is a good friend who helps you pick up women haha
@sirdrip1313 Жыл бұрын
This exact same thing is in Halo ODST
@michaelusswisconsin60022 жыл бұрын
AC7?
@eyoutube12 жыл бұрын
What about the American Kratos Valkyrie which was designed, already tested, and prototyped way before the Ghost Bat? Edit: It can also carry multiple weapon systems.
@petersinclair3997 Жыл бұрын
There do appear to be similarities. The ghost bat has interchangeable mission cones and can operate by itself, without an other aircraft. One flew from Australia over to New Zealand, returned to Australia and landed by itself. A major goal is to keep the production cost down to be able to create swarms. Guess, eventuality, units within swarms will communicate with each other? Controlled by a ground computer?
@rickblackwell64352 жыл бұрын
Man, can you turn the music down please.
@harryhatter29622 жыл бұрын
It will be devloped with a scram jet engine.......which is more than mach 7
@petersinclair3997 Жыл бұрын
Mach 7. Then twenty of them, autonomously communicating with each other? No pilot in the air?
@kellyr26812 жыл бұрын
No mention of the internal weapons bay.....lol.
@SuperJohn123542 жыл бұрын
It’s called loyal wingman
@razony2 жыл бұрын
Ghost Mav. (Maverick) Sounds better. Bat sounds... Batty. But I'm American.
@stevoc99302 жыл бұрын
I seen this movie it starred Jamie Foxx.
@Talus-Gort2 жыл бұрын
Woomera is pronounced wum-ə-ra, not woo-mair-a. Where "ə" is a schwa ---- like an unstressed short /u/ sound.
@bbgcars2 жыл бұрын
WOW THE MOVIE STEALTH BECOMES REALITY!
@hrhamada1982 Жыл бұрын
prefer Valkyrie over Ghost Bat
@blisteringstars2 жыл бұрын
why tf would it dogfight when it can bvr
@maxbgi7010 ай бұрын
Will it shoot down its own wingman? Never know with boeing. Lol…. Missles may unexpectedly shoot!
@karloyu34842 жыл бұрын
❤️❤️👍
@KCJbomberFTW Жыл бұрын
Why only six? Why not 400?
@flotech112 жыл бұрын
Anyone thinking District 9?
@lostbirdsproduction2 жыл бұрын
U.S. Wingman
@DavidtheNorseman2 жыл бұрын
I still can't help thinking all you have to do is hack the UAV and then shoot down the manned one. Battlestar Galactica comes to mind where all you need is to buy off the one specialist and down go the aerial warcraft. That said, UAVs allow for physical use no pilot could survive plus when you lose one you don't lose all that experience and skill that go with the pilot. They just reset their joystick and away they go again....All the best to the Aussies !!