Gimp vs. Photoshop | The Ultimate Comparison (2023)

Рет қаралды 21,862

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 89

@BeCreativeOkay Жыл бұрын

🔥Gimp or Photoshop, which is your pick? Would you help this video reach 5K likes? You're awesome! ➝ Get Photoshop (35% off): thecyberlab.co/Photoshop Best Design Software: kzbin.info/www/bejne/nXe7qqqse7OZr6M

@Artist1974CH 8 ай бұрын

I say NO to Adobe and NO to the rest of corporate America!

@swcomer Жыл бұрын

Four out of five on price? How do you improve on FREE? Should Gimp pay us to download the software?

@FotiosKaramanlakis 11 ай бұрын

True!! I don’t know either where this rate come from!

@DigitalMetal 10 ай бұрын

They're getting a kick back from Adobe with the Link in the description. That's why they couldn't get GIMP a higher score.

@maxwellmem 8 ай бұрын

I was thinking the same thing.

@eterna1379 7 ай бұрын

bro wanted to be paid for using the software

@JohnnyGomezSn 6 ай бұрын

LoL

@ceilingfan12345 Жыл бұрын

This is just an Adobe ad, which you at least made pretty clear with a sponsorship from them. Clearly you're being paid to make it look better than it is. There's not even an attempt to appear unbiased. Nobody thinks the subscription model is a "good deal" or "affordable" except for large corporations making tons of money off of it.

@TheSpaceDogOfficial 9 ай бұрын

Agree

@metasamsara 8 ай бұрын

💯

@tek_lynx4225 9 ай бұрын

seriously your sponsor is adobe... yea this is not a biased video.

@yannikitin876 11 ай бұрын

4/5 for the price value of a free software ? Wat ?

@jarekshark1356 6 ай бұрын

absurd

@PlatoCooper 6 ай бұрын

5/5 its maybe when they give you money for downloading their app

@khzzzzzzzz 3 ай бұрын

And its even open source, so you even can fork and make your custom version of gimp lol

@LeonidasArg2021 10 ай бұрын

Okay you convinced me I'm using GIMP

@jeffb1106 10 ай бұрын

Ok, I STOPPED the video when I saw that you gave GIMP the same price score as $20 PER MONTH Photoshop. PER MONTH. I'm leaving after posting this and won't come back. I regret coming to here.

@KosmicWolf 6 ай бұрын

You got far, I stopped the moment I saw that this is sponsored by adobe

@lloen1900 2 ай бұрын

Thank you for saving me 12 minutes.

@mattbarry5938 Ай бұрын

Riiight!!! Dude is a straight photoshop promoter. He said he thinks adobe is better for “teams of professionals” 🤣. Yeah teams of professionals who use adobes AI to automate everything and actually can’t navigate half of the software on their own without it. Meanwhile, if someone is proficient in gimp, & knows to navigate and use the software good, I personally would consider them more of a professional digital artist or graphic designer than anyone who pays money to for ai tools and automation.

@DigitalMetal 10 ай бұрын

GIMP is Free but still only get's a 4/5. IT should be a 5/5 on price. But then at the end you find out why they gave it a lower score than Photoshop. The video creators are getting a kick back from Adobe. Just check out the link in the description. Never trust someone who is being paid to tell you something.

@tw9535 Жыл бұрын

If a paid software had a lifespan of 3 years then that is $720 for 3 years. How do $720 and $0 get the same rating? * Even just a 2 year lifespan is $480. And payments never end. Never. End. (Until you die, I guess.) And that's before expanded Adobe cloud storage costs are added on. (Which also never end. Every month. Until you die.) Until GIMP gets proper adjustment layers the program Krita does. And GIMP may in version 3.2. CMYK as well. To me, the lack of adjustment layers is the biggest current drawback to GIMP. Personally, I love Photoshop. But Adobe is the Borg. And GIMP + Krita can do very well. And darktable for the raw stage. And ... careful preparation when creating the photograph in the first place instead of relying so heavily on magical AI post-production from the Borg. Which you will be paying for every month of your life. Until you get forgetful enough in your old age to not know how to update your credit card number for Adobe. Or until... you die. (To be more fair, the 3-year comparison for me would be $720 vs. $250+ , as I do send $25-$30 per year to open sources that I am actively using).

@metasamsara 8 ай бұрын

Why GIMP + Krita? Why do you need both and not just Krita? (I'm not familiar with Krita but installed Darktable after reading your comment, thanks!)

@metasamsara 8 ай бұрын

ps: do you know a good alternative to substance designer and substance painter?

@Sirmenonottwo 4 ай бұрын

As a former photoshop user and current GIMP user I have to say that not having adjustment layers is not a big deal or deal breaker at all to me because I didn't even know about them until 2019. Honestly as an old school photoshop user I found them clunky and confusing. GIMP indicates what layer you are on which photoshop does not do by default, that feature alone make non-destructive editing really nice. The entire way GIMP's layer system works is better than photoshop because you can not click and drag to move layers which I think we all have done in photoshop to our detriment. Its got a much nicer GUI imo too because in the layers area you can do 8 things with your mouse in space of about 2 inches.

@SKMRify 2 ай бұрын

Agreed.

@javierdavilam306 Жыл бұрын

Not a hater, but I don't know how Ps got the exact same points in price that Gimp got. Of course I understand that you get cool features, updates, AI, etc. But I'm pretty sure that free forever will always be better than $20 a month The rest of the video is pretty much accurate

@NoenD_io 9 ай бұрын

AI* and yes we don't need some crazy tool that will eat your gpu

@skidhookroll 9 ай бұрын

Thanks Adobe! Can't wait to use the FREE GIMP.

@dorian1370 2 ай бұрын

why is gimp in price only getting 4/5 if it is for free?

@BlenderBob 3 ай бұрын

You lost me when you announced the discount on your description. Definitively not a neutral review.

@Never-t4y 9 ай бұрын

I find it truely hilarious that you gave a notoriously expensive software and a free software the exact same score for “price” How could this possibly of gotten past the editing desk, what a glaring mistake

@metasamsara 8 ай бұрын

it's not a mistake it's adobe's type of marketing. probably will get sued by the EU at some point, I hope.

@stefanodincecco 8 ай бұрын

A free software vs a very expensive one which is also the sponsor of the video…

@Resolve4u 5 ай бұрын

For me, Gimp does all essential tasks. I create all works in Gimp.

@edwardmacnab354 8 күн бұрын

I just recently found out that Gimp has a lot of Plugins . Perhaps some of these can cover the inadequacies . There is also the option to code your own Plugin to solve your issues . I wonder if you can make money on Plugins you might Create ?

@Ptr-NG Жыл бұрын

I do want to stay lightweight and more importantly, more specialized in image manupilation only... no need for extra features!

@LucasManoelBrum Ай бұрын

In Brazil the sub is like $60 a month. 80% off the users go to a ''alternative'' way to use adobe programs.

@BlueNish12 9 ай бұрын

I give you O.1/5.5 for your for your gimp gimp price rating 😂😂

@WebCoder007 4 ай бұрын

Thanks to the comments i did not watch the video and wasted my 13min to watch adobe ad

@Enclave. 6 ай бұрын

As somebody who doesn't have a ball in this game? The fact that you took a sponsorship for Adobe in this video? Really does make it seem more like an advertisement than an actual comparison and thus isn't going to be a fair comparison.

@techtonicsystems Ай бұрын

Very interesting Video. Thanks. Not sure why cost=free only gets 4.5 though?

@williamcase426 7 ай бұрын

GIMP is all u need

@daveindezmenez 9 ай бұрын

Rah! Rah! Rah! Sis! Boom! Bah! This comparison had all the legitimacy of a cheerleading squad cheering the home team, in this case Photoshop. Giving Photoshop such a high rating on price showed a willful ignorance about true costs. Sure $20 a month seems reasonable but multiply that times 12 and it doesn't seem quite as affordable. And don't forget that this monthly expense is FOREVER and that Adobe at any time can raise it. Another thing mention in this video was that GIMP doesn't have non-destructive editing without making any effort to see if that was in the works for a future version. (It's going to be part of the next major release.) It also said that community developed software has slow release cycles which isn't necessarily true. Just take a look at how quickly the 3D software Blender has developed. It is rapidly catching up to its commercial competitors and is surpassing many of them. If GIMP had a foundation structured like the Blender Foundation it might be developing as quickly. CMYK support might be a big issue if you are in print but most doing photo editing aren't. Many of the whiz-bang features that Adobe keeps stuffing into Photoshop aren't things useful enough to justify the increased cost. Another thing this video completely ignored was that there might be any other software that could be competitive other than GIMP, free or otherwise. There is. For instance for a one time purchase of $50 you can buy Affinity Photo which does most of the key things that people use Photoshop for, including having non-destructive editing built into it. Sure it might not have AI but isn't Adobe facilitating the demise of their own customers with their uncritical embrace of it? I never got comfortable enough with the interface of GIMP to want to make it my photo editing app of choice and Adobe's constant desire to dip into your pocket has given me second thoughts about Photoshop, as well as the rest of their offerings. They've already made their money long ago and don't need mine.

@Nichrysalis 11 күн бұрын

Why tf is that bell 10 times louder

@SKMRify 2 ай бұрын

There's no doubt that Photoshop is more robust. Nevertheless, GIMP handles layers more intuitively; has more and superior blend modes [38 vs. 27]; and has more and better filters and effects. If you compare complex image compositions by both Photoshop and GIMP master artists here on KZbin you'll often find that the blending in GIMP is slightly better. Peace.

@TheSpaceDogOfficial 10 ай бұрын

Bro you were sponsored by adobe

@IdAefixBE 8 ай бұрын

Open-source certainly doesn't mean that no one gets paid to do it, that's quite a gross simplification to make there. GIMP precisely may not be of those, but many open-source projects have hired teams and open-source software can even be made by commercial companies, maybe you've heard of small startups like Microsoft or Google which happen to be the most productive open-source contributors...

@RaeiFlames 5 ай бұрын

i clicked out the moment i saw the adobe creative cloud sponsorship, i haven't watched it, but i know he is going to show adobe as the better option 🤣,

@zackrobat 7 ай бұрын

gimp gets a 4 out of 5 rating for price??? It's FREE. You don't even need to give an email address. This video is obviously biased. The free option gets 4/5 and the paid subscription option gets 4/5??? What exactly would a free alternative need in order to get a 5/5 for price? To me it's obvious that the people making the video did this to avoid gimp having a final average rating too close to PhotoShop.

@gargoyled_drake 2 ай бұрын

Honestly. We are talking about creative work with these softwares. And i can not see how photoshop is the favorit in this. It's costly. It doesn't spark creativity. Instead it want's to do everything for you instead of letting you do the work. Where as. Gimp. You can just configure to work like you want it to. This is the true differences between the two. One being closed software that is overpriced. The other being free to use open software. For artists and creativ people. The choice is obvious.

@j7ndominica051 8 ай бұрын

Use a Captain Jack Sparrow Version that requires less system resources. The black Ps guru from KZbin Piximperfect invented this term. Lol.

@joanarling 9 ай бұрын

OK, I stopped the video at 4/5 price for Gimp. My question would be: Does it run on my system? Photoshop won't, end of comparison.

@leumasco30 5 ай бұрын

Ps against GIMP in a video supported by Ps itself! No Bias whatsoever, right...?

@clouddefender1773 7 ай бұрын

Did you just compare 2 software while being paid by one of them..... Yeah.... Sorry but skipping this

@ShinobiDiabolik 7 ай бұрын

Biased review. He even created biases introducing the programs raining champion vs crappy underdog . From here he wants to created a mood in favor of one vs another. Well earned dislike for creating and introducing biases

@jimdshea 4 ай бұрын

Yes. And had a promo code. I stopped watching at 1:17.

@SimilakChild Жыл бұрын

Krita is better than all of those. But i think its exclusive to Linux only.

@MohamedEssam-gx9vh Жыл бұрын

krait running on windows too.

@DjaildoQSjr Жыл бұрын

@@MohamedEssam-gx9vhKrita is focused on digital illustration, so I don't know how good it is for photo editing. Beside that, Krita runs on pretty much every system: Linux, Windows, MacOS, iPad OS, Chrome OS, and Android (beta).

@jdslipknot Жыл бұрын

krita and gimp does two different things im afraid.

@daveindezmenez 9 ай бұрын

I like Krita for its digital drawing and painting capabilities and for those reasons I think it is a great replacement for Photoshop. It might need some work to make it more crash proof but I'm sure that will come with time. For doing that I see absolutely no reason to pay for Photoshop. I haven't really tried it for photo editing, since it doesn't really seem to be designed for that, but I'm sure for a lot of people it would work fine for that. (I use Affinity Photo for my photo editing needs.)

@93buzzbee 9 ай бұрын

Completely agree with the rest. You can't give them both the same score on price. Especially when you're sponsored by one of them. Also oh yeah use my code and get 40% off but for how long and when Adobe decides to jack up the price then what. Oh it's still a 4/5 for price isn't it! Don't ruin your reputation by shilling out for these companies that only care about the bottom line.