How to Master Absolute Value Questions on the GMAT

[@lapgandhi]

I am inherently good at quant and got a Q51 in an official mock. However, I did not know around 80% of the techniques used in this video. Proud to say this webinar was useful for me and I am sure would be for everyone.

[@kunalshinde7293]

If it had been the question of ‘weakening the argument’ I would have gone with your comment as the answer.😅

[@gamelover8968]

This man is a legend! Makes things so simple, even though my quant is already good, I learnt a lot

[@srilanka739]

wish he did a couple more videos

[@TomasPena-lh6qu]

Aditya you're doing God's work. I'm watching this way 2 years in the future and this is absolutely incredible. Thank you for the work you are doing.

[@johnnay97]

Aditya out here dropping straight knowledge. No messing around. Well structured and concise. MVP!

[@gmatclub]

Thank you so much for your feedback and support 👍

[@MathCuriousity]

What happened to solving the q on the front of the video

[@NehaVerma-u1w]

Wow, I am speechless after watching Aditya’s inequalities and absolute value sessions. No one (I mean it… absolutely “No One” 😊) could have explained these topics better than him. MUST MUST WATCH, if you really want to understand these concepts !!

[@bharathravi6517]

Answer to 700 ( last question ) is both conditions are sufficient. On solving the given equation, we will get two solutions x=y or x+y=-4 (remove the mod and solve by type3). To remove x=y solution, we need a statement to say x and y are not equal. XY2, Y

[@vikramaditya8126]

So ultimately what is the answer ..what is the value of X+Y? Is it -4?

[@samriddhisinha1334]

thanks so much!!

[@SnigdhaPankaj]

I have never dreaded a topic more than this. Thank you so much for making it a cakewalk!!

[@gmatclub]

Thank you! Stay tuned as Aditya Kumar is coming back on KZbin with more such powerful sessions. Stay Subscribed!

[@joeboxter3635]

@59:00 Type II, @1:01 Type III & Type IV @1:06 Type 5

[@FinDiary]

No side hustles, straight to the point. Awsome Aditya. Very helpful. Im struggling on accuracy of Absolute values. This is saver for me :)

[@mileeme]

Wow Aditya Kumar is brilliant at breaking down and explaining complex problems.

[@akankshauniyal1002]

Thank you so much Aditya. I have been struggling with Absolute Value since long. It used to haunt me like anything. You just made it approachable for me. Thanks a ton

[@Gaurav_Gupta]

This was an amazing session, really recommend going through it

[@gmatclub]

👍 Thank you for the feedback. We appreciate it as we look for ways to bring the right topics to our channel.

[@rohitsekar]

Thanks for really breaking things down to the very basic level and making to more interesting to learn these concepts 👍

[@filippoiguera3224]

Thank you so much, Aditya! Wonderful lesson! Thank you also to the GMATClub

[@vishalb1040]

Another gem of a video. Here is to more content from you sir! GMAT club are you listening!

[@shikharsrivas]

The most important video on GMAT Quant on youtube.

[@sayaknag4918]

The problem in 37:55 is wrong I think. X>|y| this should be the case. only X>0 and X>y will not solve the equation. Ex: X=1, Y=-2

[@physicsnovice656]

yeah, was thinking about making a comment that there's mistake

[@jasonvoreseeas6578]

Yes that's true but the second part is correct where 1st statem is y>0 and 2 is x>y is accurate

[@vaishnavisharma8405]

Yeah that's right. But while solving it he said the magnitude of x should be greater than the magnitude of y; and if we say |x| > |y|, and x>0, then it would suffice.

[@UroojFatimaAmin]

This was brilliant. I was struggling a lot with absolute values with inequalities and found the video incredibly helpful

[@gmatclub]

Great to hear! Do Subscribe to our channel.

[@jijoninan5406]

Very good explanation of concept & beautiful sample questions to build the right & easy understand. Hope to have more videos like this on other topics as well.

[@gmatclub]

Thank you very much! Do Subscribe to our channel to get notifications of future sessions. Upon subscribing, you will get FREE Access to our Premium GMAT Question Bank for 7 Days gmatclub.com/google_verify.php

[@Freelancer-rv8lo]

By far the best video I have seen on this topic

[@aparnabaskaran2448]

Thank you so much for this video - Aditya and GMAT club! I've been struggling with inequalities since the beginning of my prep, and I'm so glad I found this video. FINALLY, I feel like I have an idea of how to approach these questions. How you've managed to make even this topic seem easy is beyond me.

[@gmatclub]

Glad it was helpful! It's indeed a speciality of Aditya to teach complex subjects in easy and simple language. Pls don't forget to press LIKE and SUBSCRIBE!

[@shabbired]

I has alwyas been a pleasure getting into your quant sessions...just loved it..

[@gmatclub]

Thank you for your kind words.

[@gowriuh09]

In the question is x|y| > y^2 along with conditions x > 0 , x > y we can also add one more that is y < 0 bcz in the equation y is inside mode on the L.H.S and getting squared on the R.H.S where it converted into postive both the sides .

[@houdasrhir3216]

The question around minute 38, I think the question should be is x>IyI? and not is x>y. Therefore, the answer to the question should be E and not C. For the second case where the conditions are y>0 and x>y, yes the answer is C. Please correct me if I am wrong. Thank you very much for this very insightful video.

[@gmatclub]

I am not sure if Aditya (the instructor in this video) is actively following the comments posted here. Perhaps it would be a good idea to post this question and your query in GMAT Club quant forum to seek feedback from the community and experts. gmatclub.com/forum/quantitative-7/

[@deepakpatel2292]

Thanks a lot Aditya. Both Inequality and Abs value videos are very helpful and packed with concepts :).

[@garimasharma6652]

Thank you so much for these amazing sessions on inequality and modulus!

[@prachitabakliwal5207]

@Aditya Kumar You are truly quant master. Learnt so much...Thanks a tons

[@santiagonavarro574]

Wonderful video - thank you Aditya and GMAT Club

[@darshanmody8775]

Aditya thank you so much. You're an amazing teacher! Made this complex topic soo soo easy and really made us understand that how incorrect rather time consuming the plug-in approach is.

[@harshkhatri1691]

why was the 700 question cut off?

[@srilanka739]

yes?

[@harikajanjanam1185]

Thank you Aditya, I’ve atleast watched this 4 times now!

[@gmatclub]

So nice! Do also subscribe to our channel.

[@vikramaditya8126]

Pls provide solution for the last question​@@gmatclub

[@michiesim]

so happy i found this session! thank you aditya

[@ishmamfaiyaj6661]

Aditya is a hero

[@bellelumm9352]

Wow.. Thank you. You make things sound so simple

[@mariaclaraalberoni9681]

That was mind blowing! Thank you.

[@gmatclub]

Reach out to Aditya Kumar on LinkedIn www.linkedin.com/in/aditya-kumar-a29a6779/

[@aishwaryanarayan617]

Fantastic class sir! But where is the last question you just mentioned at the end (700 type question)?

[@pradeepkthakur]

amazing video. Thanks for clearing so many concepts.

[@ayushmandey3611]

man this was a brilliant explanation - good stuff @Aditya

[@Pure_India]

Really Awesome Explanation Aditya Kumar Sir ! You have great sense of explaining.

[@poojaarora9504]

He is good but you are not Abhijeet Patel

[@ryankoech]

​@@poojaarora9504 who is that

[@poojaarora9504]

@@ryankoech I just came to know him through some admission sessions.

[@Makitatata]

In 43:20, why do we make the sign of the entire absolute variable be negative, and not just the variable? Meaning, if we are plugging in the variable x, wouldn't we only change the sign of the X?

[@isabelleburq5480]

Thank you so much Aditya!!! ✨

[@keshavsharma2031]

Great.. Simply brliant

[@namesakee]

Legend in gmat quant !! Thank you !!

[@yashodharabakliwal1133]

Really made things simple for me. Thanks.

[@siminsu5777]

Super helpful, thank you!

[@varshaamuruganandam]

sir the session was so helpful thanks a lot. awesome class

[@ravink6306]

this is such a game changer - thank you!

[@theblinkingidiot3303]

Had to write this...you are Bond...James Bond WOW !

[@Lucky-le5rj]

Brilliant session.

[@caroleg1997]

Hello aditya, great work but help me umderstand why in 33:44 a and b cannot both be negative because |-2+ -3| which is |-5| is not < |-2- -3| which is |1|

[@Mahesh-yn6kz]

Great video, Thanks Aditya

[@gmatclub]

Glad you liked it!

[@isu94]

Thank you so much guys!!! This was so so helpful 🔥

[@satyashivadas4864]

Excellent teaching Aditya

[@caroleg1997]

hi gmat club for type 4 absolute values in 1:05:50 why not take the roots like in the case of type 3 and have x and y to be less than 0? please help. I cant seem to move forward from this

[@gmatclub]

Hi Caroleg, not sure if Aditya is still following this comment thread; I think it will be more helpful if you just post your doubt in the Quant forum on GMAT Club (gmatclub.com/forum/quantitative-7/) and make sure to tag @Bunuel in your post; I am sure Bunuel and other GMAT experts on the forum will help address your question.

[@janiceakh]

Incredible. Thanks a lot!

[@vikassingh5833]

Very well explained , thanks !!!

[@kevalpatel2882]

This is awesome, thank you!

[@gmatclub]

You're very welcome! Don't forget to hit the subscribe button and get GMAT Tests FREE for 7 days gmatclub.com/google_verify.php

[@memo44536]

perfect. thank you for great explanation

[@Dhruv.k]

Great teacher

[@gmatclub]

Thank you! 😃

[@tvishaverma3689]

37:38 - 2nd condition should be x>|y| -------> eg. nos to solve this, x=2, y=-3 ----> x|y| = 6, y^2=9, LHS

[@00estefaaa00]

Is there some link where I could find the whole video? I would like to check the last excercise, but it seems that tha video was cut at the last part.

[@gmatclub]

Unfortunately that video is not available with us anymore.

[@massonchacon4258]

Hello, wouldn't we need in the problem "x * IyI > power(y , 2)", the information confirming that y != 0? This is given in the second instance of the problem, where y > 0 and x > y, but not in x > 0 and x > y. Therefore, I would think the info from both last statements to be insufficient. Thank you for your time. I hope to get an answer, please.

[@gmatclub]

Please mention the time stamp and we will see if that question is discussed on GMAT Club.

[@massonchacon4258]

@@gmatclub39:06

[@stormstorm8833]

Amazing session!

[@nicosteins6172]

the answer should either be E or changed question: prompt: x|y|>y^2 ? 1. x> 0 2. x> y you don't know if y >0. statement E. or change question to "x|y|>y^2 ? if y > or < 0" then answer is statement C

[@karthikvenkat6333]

Correct. Nice observation

[@jaanvidaiya]

Either way y is going to be positive or 0 so c is correct

[@jaanvidaiya]

Either way y is going to be positive or 0 so c is correct

[@mikeysurehands]

@@jaanvidaiya but based on "the prompt" is x*abs(y) > y^2 and then the info from the statements.... if y is 0 then the term is not greater, if y is greater than 0, it is.

[@kianamarshall5609]

such a great video thank you!

[@raghavkabra4851]

38:25 I have a doubt, wouldn't it be 'not sufficient' "Option E" as the conditions given doesn't clarify y>0??

[@sanskarmurarka1973]

i think the question was whether x is positive

[@whyiseveryaliastaken]

In the type 5 example at roughly 1:14:00, why do we just have to know whether x

[@genevieverubio1149]

Thank you so much! Amazing vid

[@baigmusic]

These questions absolutely fried my brain lol.. but i thank you for the absolutely excellent explanation… it’s frustrating to know how absolutely useless these questions are in the real world..

[@hadiaghaziani824]

absolutely brilliant 👍

[@snehasharma257]

Thank you so much sir. Really helpful 🤗

[@anmol9943]

at 30:00 should n be anything except 0?

[@nileshmishra4602]

Thanks for the video

[@gmatclub]

Our pleasure. Stay Subscribed!

[@ravleenmalhotra1939]

In the question ‘what is the value of y?’ Can I directly say that 1 will give me 2 values of x coz degree is 2 which means I can’t find y directly. Moving on to 2 gives me 2 possibilities which when I check in 1 show that y will be imaginary if x is -8. Giving me my answer c and y=14. Please tell me if this is the correct way to see this?

[@amyr8539]

Was the last 700 level question cut off from this video? I felt like it ended abruptly.

[@saroha379]

at 38:30 wouldnt answer be E?

[@Bhupinderdhanda]

At 37:27 in the video there must be one more condition Y>0

[@ashiqkorikkar]

In 38:56, Shouldn't the answer be E instead of C? Don't we need |x| > |y| (instead of x > y)? If x = 2 and y = -3, then LHS is 6 and RHS is 9 : then x|y| < y^2 If x = 4 and y = -3, then LHS is 12 and RHS is 9: then x|y| > y^2

[@vamsiacharya2099]

You're right! But if we know y>0 like in the second condition, then x>y will suffice.

[@vedsgoingplaces]

Thank you very much

[@surbhikothari1217]

Could I please get the link for the inequalities webinar?

[@surbhikothari1217]

Actually, all the links mentioned? They don't show in the chat window

[@jayatichakrabarty4697]

@aditya kumar: can you plz upload vedios of number system?

[@palashrawat401]

9:00 Variable cancellation

[@palashrawat401]

14:40- Basics

[@palashrawat401]

49:30 - Type 1

[@palashrawat401]

1:01:00 - Type 2

[@palashrawat401]

1:08:00 - How to plug in values in sure shot way (Revise)

[@avilashbardhan2949]

|3-y| also means y

[@Wolfgang-li9bx]

57:33 - how to create a range

[@lakshanikamadabhushi9188]

can the concept of 5 types be used for multiple equations as well? In our example, we had only one inequality in which there was only one parenthesis. can we use this concept if we have more than one parenthesis? If yes, please share an example

[@gmatclub]

Perhaps you should ask this in Quant forum gmatclub.com/forum/quantitative-7/ Don't forget to subscribe to our channel & Get free GMAT mock tests for 7 days.. gmatclub.com/google_verify.php

[@krutiparekh1]

Hi, this was a great session. However, i do have a question on the general form for greater than. I tried applying the same to the below two questions and couldn't get the correct answer: 1. |x+5| > | 3x-2| 2. |x+3| >= 4x would highly appreciate a response on this.

[@ankitbharadwaj4318]

this wount go on the general form. Its more of a miscellaneous as 4x is a variable. analysis will be better here

[@ankitbharadwaj4318]

first x> -3/4 or x< 7/2, second is x

[@Ounick1]

You are incorrect for the question at 35:07 the correct answer is x > |y| for the equation x |y| > y^2 You have x > 0 and x>y However, to prove this incorrect. Use x = 4 and y = -5 These numbers satisfy your condition of 4 > 0 and 4 > -5 The do NOT satisfy the original equation. 4 x |-5| is not greater than (-5)^2

[@sarathchandrarayavarapu5178]

At time 1.15.00 hr, in that particular problem why can't we solve the equation |x-5|=5-× by considering( x-5 )can be positive or -(×-5) .

[@geetpatel5155]

We can do it with that method, but it'll only take more time. Instead, if we think that 5-x is greater than or equal to 0, then it'll make our life much easier.

[@sarathchandrarayavarapu5178]

@@geetpatel5155 Thank you. Got it 👍

[@user-vk1cz3je8x]

@@geetpatel5155 if you do by sarath method,it actually giving me x has to be either 5 or 0 only not the range,is it true?

[@cgiraldom]

Hey guys, I have a question linked to this one. During the whole webinar the explanation was that |x| = something, we can analyze that X => 0, but in this problem, the approach was to take the something =>0, and the results are different. Can anyone tell me why use 5-x =>0 instead of x-5 =>0. Thanks in advance.

[@cardsmart6462]

Do you offer tutoring? I think I need help!

[@AmanPandey-wy2yf]

He does, reach him on linkedin

[@aroraurvashi4]

Please take a session on time and work, time and distance

[@gmatclub]

We have a session precisely on these topics today at 9:30pm IST kzbin.info/www/bejne/g6Hak6mmlrRqoaM

[@sarthakgupta2545]

if u r some one who has not studied maths in 11th /12th should watch this video.

[@leilarma7648]

thank you so much it s really helpful

[@gmatclub]

Glad to hear that! 👍