The Most Advanced Viewer Game Analysis Ever?

[@ircjesselee]

I just so happen to be wearing my Qa5 shirt. Very suspicious.

[@Fujibayashi50]

The tooth hurts

[@LizaFan]

Now we do the procedure, yes?

[@patrick32311]

An explanation of Qa5 could be linked to the second position that you underlined with f4. This allows Qd2 move for recapture in f4 or also Qg5 (or Qg5+) and recapture in f4 with a possible exchange of queens.

[@kmarasin]

Both players booked up to the teeth I used to play games like this in middle school where me and another player would play 15 moves of theory in a Sicilian Najdorf or Dragon every week against each other.

[@SahnigReingeloetet]

I used to do this, in fact, the Najdorf was the first Sicilian I seriously studied. I play the Accelerated Dragon instead now because nobody does any actual serious study on it and it‘s actually quite nice for Black if you know how to handle a Maroczy bind.

[@vaibhavvb9898]

Not kramnik approved analysis

[@sorpresasfelicidad8314]

Benst by test.

[@yotoober1]

Very, very specious.... 🤔

[@paulgoogol2652]

black found Bc4 which is correct with some preparation. he had to avoid Rg2+ trading rooks. with time on his hands he'd find it. if this was just Blitz why wouls anyone care anyway? I thought Qa5 was logical because the black queen on c7 threatening mate and stuff looks sexier than the white queen on a3 sitting there to block the a pawn (not that it had to move but maybe in some parellel universe)

[@robmckennie4203]

"I had black in this game between 2 players" okay, weird way to say that

[@chessyoshi8626]

They specified what color they had, and the number of players was used to highlight that two players, and not just the one, had lichess ratings matching their uscf ratings. Before trying to make fun of how people talk, attempt to listen and understand what they are saying, then normal speech won’t sound so weird.

[@shantoreywilkins651]

🍿🧈🍿🍿🧀🍿

[@bleifrei8783]

Neither one of these ~1500 players blundered ONCE in this game. Could it be they've been watching GM Ben Finegold? ❤ Or maybe they blundered the next three... :)

[@douglasquaid7550]

very suspicious

[@wallysullivan9315]

Way too many innacuracies by engine standards to be remotely suspicious.