Go-Back-N

[@zombiegurl6941]

one whole lecture explained in just 5 mins. amazing video :)

[@ArpanDasS]

Actually within 3 minutes :D

[@bangvu2127]

Brilliant!!!! Amazing visualisation of the protocol. 3 mins watching this vid gave a better result than spending 3 hours on my textbooks. Thanks!!!

[@steven7dong]

I am having such a hard time understanding this concepts, but these people made it so fun and easy to understand. HAHA... Thank you!!!

[@VirginiaCepeda]

This is more fun than reading the book :P

[@daalwada]

Hahah! Absolutely!! :D

[@emirpetek5257]

it was perfect video even if it recorded 16 years ago, thanks!

[@mkemaltas]

That might be the best video on youtube.

[@amirhosseinjavadi7031]

You are save my life right now❤❤😂😂

[@adamdekel3661]

An amazing video ! can't be better than that !!

[@kutumbakavarsha7948]

really extraordinary i just understood it clearly thanks a lot.......

[@madokakaname471]

this predicted corona minus the mouth caps ..

[@emranhuda5957]

Thnx a lot guys!!! Great job.

[@MastressOfDesaster]

Genial :D da kann die Rechnernetzeprüfung am Montag kommen :)

[@smithers38]

12 Jahre später und jetzt bin ich an der Reihe :D

[@ofanan1]

The movie is very nice, but unfortunately wrong. By Kurose & Ross, in GBN the receiver uses a single timer - not many timers, as shown here. The receiver has no receive buffer; instead the receiver merely discards all out-of-order arrivals. The protocol shown here is much closer to Selective Repeat than to Go-Back-No.

[@DEVIL1001111]

in GO-BACK-N ,, the sender has time for oldest unacked. packet . right ?! ,,, so the timer should restart when the ACK received right ?! ,,,, I think i have confused ,,, please help me

[@NoName-lp4qy]

really amazing video, good job

[@TheGameIsOverCy]

EPIC VIDEO ! thanks a lot :)

[@JacobEriksson]

this feels like a fever dream

[@giordanobrunoolivettimatti3062]

when are you guys going to post new content???????????????

[@yoshyyosha3766]

sweet ^^ ....عسلات جداااا بقاا

[@pawanpandey2]

Awesome Explaination.. Thank you very nuch

[@korneliuspasztor7465]

Why do I have the feeling that there's more than just this ^^, thx anyways I understand the basics of it now :)

[@m00sej00se]

this is great.. love the aphex twin

[@AndrewMerrell]

burn?

[@kyumaru6]

seriously, what is name of the background music?

[@BergenVestHK]

Popcorn.

[@vaibesb4u]

ha ha ha very nice video short and sweet made me understand my concepts

[@nikhilvenkat221]

very good experiment really liked most.

[@MrFilipealbuquerque]

2022, danke

[@nyilmaz]

great way to understanding, thanks a lot!

[@rexyl547]

Lovely video. But one thing to be confirmed: ack1 means package#1 receive and ask for package#2. Should be ack0 instead of ack1 in your video when sender send ack to receiver!

[@sebastianmontoto6454]

muy bueno che !! Saludos

[@mifuerni]

@masterheini - Hallo, ich habe jetzt gerade die Vorlesungsunterlagen nicht zur Hand, aber folgende Erklärung im Netz gefunden. "Geht irgendein Datenpaket verloren, so meldet der Empfänger einfach jeweils zurück, welche Nummer das Paket haben muss, das er als nächstes empfangen kann."

[@fhloraful]

thank u so much!! it helps me a lot....

[@vaibesb4u]

tanq very much it cleared my concepts to some level

[@Dimme]

THANK YOU!!!!!!!!! It's was so easy and still my book just sucks

[@GiorgioFicara]

Great!!!!!!!!!!! Fantastic!!

[@khaledchinwi1273]

great work thanks

[@FabianoArantes]

Thanks!!! This video helped me a lot!

[@양창엽-t6m]

Thank you.

[@gahlyogu4570]

packet loss part is the funniest

[@dctlyr1]

This crazy frog popcorn in the background

[@renatacristovam6826]

Que ótimooooooooooooooo! That is Great!!!!!!

[@Zoolanter]

Really ty and Grats!

[@karnkraftverk]

very nice thanks

[@aminejadid2702]

AWESOME !

[@dimrirahul]

yo yo yo ..!!!! sweet ..!!

[@NONmedi]

cool !! :)

[@na-pe4wu]

Lol Awesome!

[@rodro1161]

maravilla

[@gauravzerogravity]

I Love this was amazing, 5 fucking pages in book,

[@tieuyeuht91]

Good job

[@masterheini]

2:06 das doch falsch oder? wenn packet 1 verloren gegangen ist, schickt der sicherlich kein ack 1 sondern die letzte # des packets, dass er empfangen hat, in diesem beispiel packet 0 - > ack 0. würde er tatsächlich wie gezeigt ack1 abschicken, obwohl er packet 1 garnicht bekommen hat, so würden nur noch 2,3,4 neu übertragen werden und packet 1 wär auf immer verloren xD

[@ml497]

@masterheini Ihr habt recht.

[@rushikeshghatpande]

fucking awesome, thanks guys

[@kyumaru6]

understood and like the music alot lol

[@ishadijayasinghe7235]

(y) Good one.

[@sonnguyen-vi4no]

so interesting :D

[@buildnew5900]

hhh very Interesting

[@yafitmv7]

HAHA great!

[@alvayonarapuramandya9247]

hahaha lool this is educating :))

[@gahlyogu4570]

LOL!

[@sarakhan-or4tt]

😂

[@Mascarilhaaa]

😢 this is perturbating video

[@defalcator]

foreign langauge don't quite get it

[@martinperez996]

very good experiment really liked most.