Goodbye, Russia and China! America Releases New Super Fighter Jet to Replace F-22 Raptor

[@keithseamster4988]

U.S should keep old military equipment in reserve, just in case

[@howiescott5865]

How disappointing that the F-22 will retire while the Su-57 still hasn't gone into production. As for the F-15 that has seen combat... still the undefeated champion of the world. Finally, for the A-10, it'll be a sad day for Soldiers and Marines that got air support from it when it retires.

[@davelopez4046]

I'm way more satisfied than disappointed. Anytime you can outperform and produce more than any adversary, especially in aircraft it's a damn good thing. Besides our Patriot missiles and 30 year old ATACMS over in Ukraine are taking out SU57s. Just imagine what our Raptor would do to those poor Wish version "5th gen" fighters! 🤣

[@drkvenger]

I have serious doubts that the much hyped NGAD is going to be such a leap that it would make the F22 obsolete. If they are so obsolete that they are being retired - no harm in selling them to our allies right? We’d have so many orders that it would pay for the R&D.

[@mrrobot8973]

⁠@@drkvengerthey wouldn’t be obsolete, not even close. The Raptor is extremely expensive to simply upkeep, far more expensive than fighters that are still used and very capable such as the F15 & 16. It’s a mix of cost and tech secrecy that will ensure the 22 never sees another owner outside the U.S. and will be retired there. (The F35 NATO allies get is not the U.S.’s most advanced F35 version, & unlike the F22 it was built to also be sold ..for comparison sake )

[@DocSanders]

You are right. And because in war even the best laid plans can quickly turn into a cluster f***, there is no substitute for experience.

[@Tommyboi89]

The SU 57 is in production russia just cant afford a whole lot of them

[@user-bm2xf6io3c]

"Their reason for retiring the A-10 is that it is vulerable to enemies with advanced air defenses." And how about enemies without those defenses? The A-10 would be a happy warthog on that mission.

[@DEVILDOG1964]

A-10 CLOSE AIR SUPPORT AFTER GAINING OR HAVING AIR SUPERIORITY NOTHING BETTER UNLESS IT'S A HELICOPTER GUNSHIP.

[@shitballzmcshitstainz3028]

@@DEVILDOG1964 the only aircraft that hasnt performed its intended mission in the last 30 years is the A-10. It cant perform its mission because it cant defend itself in a SAM environment and needs SEAD aircraft to suppress in order to do its mission. It hasnt killed a single tank in 30 years, and the gun is only good for shooting cars. Its an awesome aircraft for sure, but only when theres nothing threatening it. The F-35 can defend itself AND kill tanks in the same mission. Doesnt need a 30mm gun to do that, which btw..it has in the form of a gun pod on the centerline. You know what killed more armor in the gulf war the first time around? The F-111. Nobody likes to talk about those statistics because the A-10 is their favorite aircraft.

[@herbb8547]

Have you ever even seen an A-10? They are only replacing the older A-10s with new, much improved models. The old ones have simply gotten to the end of their life. An aircraft can only spend so many hours in the air. Then it must be retired.

[@user-bm2xf6io3c]

@@herbb8547 Yep, they're being upgrraded to the A-10C. However, retiring the line altogether HAS been discussed before.

[@herbb8547]

@user-bm2xf6io3c The guys on the ground love having those A-10s around when things go sideways.

[@goku-z3w3v]

selalunya Aset AS memang tidak mengecewakan, tahan lasak & berkesan

[@jameslufrano4001]

You talk about one aircraft but picture another. Can’t fool us maintainers !!

[@sammcbride2464]

I am happy to hear about new stuff. China and Russia is still scared about the F-15. The A-10 is still something that cannot be replaced.

[@user-bm2xf6io3c]

A-10 can never be replaced.

[@shitballzmcshitstainz3028]

Yeah the A-10 should be replaced because its a vulnerable asset that brings literally nothing to the table until its combat air support in a SAM free environment. You know what would be better? An AH-64E. Its only 100kts slower than the A-10, carries the same amount of tank killing missiles, has a pretty beefy 30mm itself, and can survive on the modern battlefield. Cheaper too. Theres not a single aircraft that cant do the A-10s role right now, even including B-52s.

[@sammcbride2464]

@@shitballzmcshitstainz3028 A bunch of NOPE. No Helo can replace the A-10

[@shitballzmcshitstainz3028]

@@sammcbride2464 you say so, but its not like it hasnt been proven time and time over again.

[@sammcbride2464]

@@shitballzmcshitstainz3028 Not sure what the take away is from that response.

[@VinceMurante-q6d]

Retiring these A-10’s is going to come back and bite TGE assholes retiring then right in the ass!! No other jet is better suited for close air support for our soldiers in trouble on the ground than the A-10’s and I’m sure the AWESOME pilots that fly them don’t wanna stop either🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬

[@stu872]

No way they should be retired upgrade or design a replacement based on that aircraft

[@VinceMurante-q6d]

@@stu872 if it’s still going to be as slow as it is and the pilot is going to be in a titanium bathtub then why retire the A-10?! Why keep wasting the money on them updating them if they are going to retire them n possibly sell them to other countries(HUGE MISTAKE)? Don’t upgrade them n put that money towards the new close air support jet?!

[@flaviushobbs]

​@@VinceMurante-q6d There's is NOTHING to replace the A-10.

[@michaelkendall662]

they just upgraded the A-10s....they are set to be flying well into the 2030s

[@DocSanders]

Absolutely... And it's the grunts that'll have to pay the price.

[@CHENLIU1]

New upgraded software and updated systems F22s,F16vip super, F35s,F15EX super and A10s

[@reddevil4943]

F-15ex F22 Raptor equals 100% air control

[@davelopez4046]

You had me at upgraded & updated systems! Lol 🇺🇸 🫡

[@davelopez4046]

@@reddevil4943 O Beautiful for Spacious Skies! LoL 🇺🇸 🫡

[@kenmartin1919]

No matter where fighter planes advance, planes must protect grunts on the ground.

[@DavePatrick001]

The F22 is supposed to replace the F15, but they're so expensive that we don't have enough to fully replace the F15. The F35 is supposed to replace the F16 (for the AF), but the Navy and Marines use the F35 to replace other aircraft. The B1-B Lawn Dart, I mean Lancer, needs to be replaced. I used to work backshop avionics for those, and every time the pilots would take those things up for training missions, stuff would break. Replacing one circuit card would cost $50k to replace, and many parts were even more expensive. I don't understand retiring F22s, even if they're an older model, when they still have F15s and F16s in service that are over 50 years old. F22 and F35 are incredible aircraft, but they cost so much money to build, and since the Biden Administration decided to send $70 billion American tax payer dollars to Ukraine, so we can't really afford to buy them now.

[@VndNvwYvvSvv]

I don't think it's as simple as a 1-to-1 model or capability replacement. Things are changing too quickly for that to be viable. It's probably not just a different distribution of capabilities across platforms but a change in total capabilities as well, IMO.

[@Will-x9b8j]

Well the f-35 is cheaper than most, it just has a high operating cost

[@shawnpeckford4360]

There was no money sent too ukrain..period..only stock piled equipment...no money...

[@scotthackenberg2829]

But it was ok to give billonaires a 7 trillion dollar tax break in 2021 during Trumps admin?

[@DavePatrick001]

Okay, on several occasions, while you're talking about the F15, you're showing videos of the F18 Hornet (15:38 and 15:53). F15 tail fins are straight vertical. F18 tail fins are angled out. You did it again at 17:34, straight up showing a whole fleet of F18s on an Aircraft Carrier while talking about the F15 HUD.

[@ADGAMER99_OFFICIAL]

What’s the name of this aircraft

[@stephenzucchari6937]

I heard that we already have been building new FJS and they already have them waiting and ready to go and they done lots of upgrades on the F22 and they have over 500 ready to go with new engines and much more deadly weapons and much faster than before .

[@chrisholder4978]

NGAD has already been built, developed and tested......

[@peterwilliams2152]

And still failed!

[@kristybarker924]

But not in use?

[@chrisholder4978]

@@kristybarker924 do your own research on the craft. It has been built and tested as stated. Other than that, it is a 6th gen aircraft. It is under TIGHT security. The F22 and F35 are still beyond, far beyond , any competitor.

[@drewt7602]

@@peterwilliams2152 our jets from the 80's still dominate the skies were not worried about it lil bro

[@peterwilliams2152]

@@drewt7602 As long as there's no AA/AD!

[@759Alexander]

Good bye..? You shitting your pants if they say hello I guess 😂😂

[@lildeli3rddimention]

Maybe this new one is the new improved f35 back from China , after they lost the one over the East Coast of our own country !! NO ONE GOT FIRED FOR THAT ONE !!!

[@stevenjohnston7809]

Thanks for the video.

[@jameskeeler3889]

Now that we use drones as weapons, the A-10 is out

[@earlkohler3576]

There was absolutely no mention made of what this new fighter jet is. What is the new fighter jet????

[@DoubleDiamondBack2]

Yeah what's up with that

[@DarrenToepfer]

That's what I'm saying!

[@JamesLee-mr2uf]

still in cartoon stage

[@AnalytiCon2]

The F-35 Lightning ||. It was mentioned dozens of times. . .

[@DarrenToepfer]

@@AnalytiCon2 that doesn't *replace* it

[@VinceMurante-q6d]

The hell with the F-35!!

[@davelopez4046]

Yeah, that's pretty much the consensus.... of what every country that we didn't make one for yells out in anger and shakes their fist as they watch their Cold War era at best piece of junk take off the tarmac and into the sky. 🤣

[@corsinosrmijares1179]

AMERICA IS THE KING OF THE WORLD.

[@johnusher2331]

But the a 10 is a beast I would keep

[@RagsHSC-7]

The aircraft being stealth will have no bearing in close air support If you can see it, you can shoot it The f-35a is going to have billions of dollars of repairs in a cas configuration or an attempt for close air support. The a-10 has two engines for a specific reason. Now you want to send a one engine aircraft at low altitude as slow as it can go before stall to support ground forces. With our tax dollars. When the a-10 in a titanium tub with half its wings off and half a tail and one engine without hydraulics can get back to the base saving the pilot. You would rather put $100 million aircraft in that environment. You can't tell me you can't see the writing on the wall on that really. Mr. Magoo can see that 🫣

[@Offshore912]

Warhog is like the B-52 we can’t do without it do not retire it keep upgrading

[@iwantyourcookiesnow]

NGAD just got mothballed!

[@livenloud6697]

The narrator sounds like Ray Porter

[@alanmcmillan6969]

Very informative ability of the US air fleet

[@tobby2999]

More Americans are in debt but some people are getting rich.

[@Goldenmart]

That is, going further in double pace than your adversaries

[@edkolly7147]

Disappointing not really anything about the new future fighter aircraft just reviewing of present fighters and up grades.

[@user-Natarito]

I don’t presume to know how these decisions are made and I understand that many of these planes are old but almost everything that I’ve seen or read has nothing but praise for the A-10 in ground support. Especially coming from troops on the ground.

[@garydobbs5159]

I saw the F35 perform at air shows and its maneuvers were slow compared to the F16 before it. It was no comparison.

[@juanmata5589]

even if that was the case... bvr on the f35 plus stealth makes the f16 no comparison. im a big time viper fanboy too so it hurts saying so.

[@abraomario2436]

That's too grateful to hear that USA is on the march in weaponry technology, thanks to God.

[@kristybarker924]

Uh... thanks to our freaking taxes.

[@PeterToth-u9u]

MIG-31BM mounted R-37M missile destroys F-22/35 II.

[@bobbyjohnson6240]

Awesome……so where is the new fighter??

[@bobmackenzie199]

Keep the 22s.

[@ipsit3095]

A-10 should not retire until a suitable replacement is made , lawmakers don't need air support grunts do

[@stevehoogenakker9619]

While I love the A 10, it's a sam magnet at sub 300 miles per hour. They could be very useful once the radars have been killed off

[@paulnupe1911]

Russia and China were never any competition , never!

[@DocSanders]

It was that attitude that got us in to WWII (that and really good KGB/GRU work in the whitehouse). And that attitude, again, that got the complete plans for the A-Bomb into the hands of Uncle Jo Stalin just two days after we were done building it--and that kick-started the Cold War.

[@paulnupe1911]

I’m sorry your feelings are hurt. I’m an American and I’m happy my country is upgrading our military aircraft with tax payers dollars. Maybe you can tell your country’s leadership to do the same thing. Thanks and have a blessed day!❤

[@hermanstewart1463]

Could the plane that the USAF take the YF 23 out of the mothballs to replace the warthog ?

[@DarrenToepfer]

So what's the new jet replacing the f22??

[@4ujase]

Does it fly?

[@geoffreygloria118]

Send these fighter jets to the Philippines and Ukraine.

[@mohjijuan3854]

😂😂😂😂😂

[@BoyRizal-un1ri]

I love united state plan.....they are so fear about battle to focus!!!

[@florantedeogaygay2496]

Tagalugin mo na lang!

[@dan7163]

Imagine what the world would be like if we used our greatest technical knowledge and vast amounts of money and resources in something other than self destruction.

[@EdwinVazquez-t1q]

These new jets and weapons will also defend the interests of the wealthiest 2% of people who don't want to pay their fair share of taxes.

[@DavidFMayerPhD]

Hokum.

[@mannyluna1066]

PLA is waiting for the plans

[@johnusher2331]

Not only are USA more advanced we are the only ones that have nuclear power aircraft carriers

[@mr.righty6985]

They never stood a chance to begin with

[@scotts8684]

The military wants to retire proven aircraft and replace them with other aircraft not yet developed. If they were ready to go into production that would be one thing but they're not. These leaves us vulnerable from China and Russia. And what if these aircraft under development have unforeseen problems that drives their development further into the future? Then we're vulnerable for that much longer. Anticpating something is not the same as having replacements ready to go, particularly in the dangerous world we occupy now. Who are these people and what makes them think they're so smart. They certainly are not showing any smarts. Wake them up before it's too late.

[@michaelkendall662]

you can only fly a combat or commercial aircraft so long.....ever hear of metal stress?.....the airframes are only designed to last a certain number of flight hours....for the F-22 it is 8,000

[@phetbounchanthavongchantha8761]

We need to build F 99 jet The most advanced in the world

[@StevenReaves-d7g]

As much $$$ the U.S. spends on aircraft we should still keep the F-22😮😮😮😮

[@JonKorpi-fk7yo]

Why do you keep using f-14 footage mixed in

[@MikeAllgire-r4d]

No they didn’t.

[@marileedent8499]

If showing this we have better.

[@DavePatrick001]

I worry about using autonomous drones. They might be a cheaper option, but when Skynet achieves sentience, you're basically just giving it ready made robotic weapon systems.

[@drmachinewerke1]

It better be able to refuel itself

[@siksika4603]

They will never replace thr F 22...

[@__SCALES__]

Keep A10

[@momogunsabah]

means goodbye world

[@amormiranda6567]

Israel is a must advance Tecnology

[@reddevil4943]

Sounds like me y'all getting ready to mess up some money you going to retire one of the best aircraft we got😢

[@sammcbride2464]

How can you retire the GAU-8?

[@Smithsj82]

Retiring the F22 is ludicrous. Retire 100 F35’s and build 100 more F22 with updates. F35 is a dog.

[@SoManyDogs]

Um…no, it’s not. Ask Israel,if they think the F35 is a Dog. It had its fair share of teething problems…but then again so,did the F22. There is a place for both.

[@paulmortensen4123]

Military spending is pretty easy to scare up. And as long as American taxpayers are willing to fund it it will continue to grow.

[@sniper60605]

I really thought this was a video about a new fighter. Silly me. Good bye.

[@sabinovalencia8688]

USA military capacity is super strong but the president OF USA is too weak😂😂😂😂

[@kristybarker924]

So true. And the world knows it

[@pufflife45]

Listen Joe Biden is best president Joe get stuff done with out life lose on two sides involve so what you want killing do walk of shame

[@peterlangan1181]

Wrong the U.S. Military is geared for the last war….not current ones. Hell it can’t even defeat the Houthis!

[@deadnedz]

Not for long.

[@kevinmclellan998]

Leave the cult.

[@pieterjlansbergen6988]

“The battle for technological supremacy is ending with the US still at the forefront.” 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤡🤡🤡🤡

[@hungrydingo7037]

Wich is funny, because the U.S. contracted the f-15ex

[@田丸哲美]

Frank Kendall said that NGAD needs to have twice the operational radius of the F35 at the same cost as the F35. This is because China has developed ultra-long-range anti-aircraft missiles that can target tankers. The weapon bay can be the same size as the F35 because the CCA (Collaborative Combat Aircraft) carries the missiles.The US Navy also needs a fighter with twice the operational radius of the FA18. Stealth is the lowest requirement for carrier-based aircraft because the weapon bay is difficult to install and remove missiles. The new design of GCAP meets the requirements of both the US Air Force and the US Navy.　The US Navy needs twin-engine aircraft. Let's work with Boeing to get the US Air Force and US Navy on board. Lockheed Martin could create a revised NGAD by enlarging the wings and fuel tanks of the F-35. Fighters would have to visually identify friendly targets with broken identification friend or foe systems before firing a missile. If missile launches were left to the Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA), there would be no need for a weapons bay, reducing manufacturing and maintenance costs.

[@wgbenterprise7812]

It sounds like a good. move, but unfortunately, some of our so-called allies may turn on us. Providing them with this technology may work against us.

[@UnderThreatNation5.0]

The American Air Force should pass those retired planes to allies of NATO. That cannot afford fifth and sixth generations of new fighter planes

[@hilarity123]

I agree 137%

[@Wintereditz2]

No they can’t because the F22 raptor technology is too secret they are not to be given away

[@garycleveland6410]

Nope. They need to build their own.

[@brianmuter9594]

😂the american taxpayers work too hard to protect the world. Do your self a favor and get better

[@AnthonyHTerry]

That's true indeed!

[@kean-leongang1167]

The world is gonna let US borrow money to built this thang. 32 trillion debt is of no concern. That's right.

[@GeneralLee1961.3]

👍🇺🇸👍🇺🇸

[@lianlengchew7325]

美国.烏克兰全国人民.歐盟.加油加油加油加油加油加油炸吧！加油.🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉

[@ViceCoin]

US cant affordNGAD, F35 and F22. Drones are the future.

[@SlyGarro83]

Nope don't give anyone the tech

[@brandonshumaker2238]

Kratos

[@markleckron1004]

F 35 lacks rang and speed it should just be exports not USA fighters

[@andreww1225]

Not until 2030

[@DavidSherman-m5l]

Conformal fuel tanks on F-15's not only provide extended range, but also provide several stores stations for additional ordinance.

[@onlythaclonessir2525]

very Well see you later GOODBYE !!!

[@Johnny53kgb-nsa]

Lol

[@unclebuzz6913]

At 15:32 .DID I SEE A PAIR OF TOMCATS ? JUST WONDERING...

[@camarenilla]

Si seguro 😂😂😂😂 Para las peliculas de Hollywood sirve, para la vida real no 🇺🇲👎👎👎👎👎👎👎

[@pouwakaruwhiu8349]

Russia and China can match what America has, from Australia 🦘

[@playmaker8549]

If you only knew

[@reynoldliao7462]

Sounds like wishful thinking…

[@Prachayompan]

🥰🥰🥰🇹🇭🇹🇭🇹🇭🙏🙏🙏 19:13 19:13

[@anthonyokponku9673]

There's still war going on in Ukraine so what

[@scottmckenzie-hb1xj]

clapper is a snake

[@abbeyroad7901]

Yes another fighter jets for shooting air balloon .amazing .

[@jamespickens3086]

TO MUCH BRAGGING HEARSAY . I DIGRESS

[@wdp7128]

Question : how many of these can you produce and operate given financial situation of US government. Not many.

[@davelopez4046]

So did you answer your question? "Not Many"? 🤔 The United States currently has the largest operational aircraft fleet in the entire world. Doctrine maintains certain numbers must be fully operational and maintained to be able to fight and defend both our shores at any given moment. And that's just for our shores and airfields at home. Those deployed are an entirely crazy set of additional units and numbers as well. So if by "Not Many" you mean the MOST & MORE than any other country(s) even combined, here on planet Earth? Then yeah totally! 🤣 Oh, and our "Financial Situation" is a defense budget of almost $900 BILLION dollars. Which also happens to be more than every single country in the world, COMBINED. 🤣

[@michaelkendall662]

@@davelopez4046 it has the #1 and #2 largest air forces in the world.....USAF and USN

[@davelopez4046]

@@michaelkendall662 The only Air Force that stands a possible chance to compete with America's Air Force is... America's OTHER Air Force! 😆 God Bless this country! 😢 Gives "O Beautiful for Spacious Skies" a whole new meaning right! LOL 🇺🇸 🫡

[@adozub3366]

This is so funny 🤣 America 🇺🇸 said that Su57 and J20 are inferior but still they are super scared that they had to create a new jet to counter the inferior Su57 and J20

[@Goldenmart]

Going further in double pace than your adversaries

[@rickpierre5296]

They are technological junkies, they love building something no one else can build, they are challenging the countries of the world to come up with the ultimate fighter jet . In doing this they also challenge themselves.

[@MitchNewman-l6r]

No the USA military is the future to where Russia can’t afford this high technology that the US contains and it makes the US dominate in every way.

[@michaelkendall662]

LOL...there are 5 SU-57s-----3 operational and NONE in Ukraine.........150 J-20 and they have a RCS bigger than an F-18 yet they claim they are a "5th generation fighter"

[@adozub3366]

@@michaelkendall662 why are F22 and F35 still afraid of S400 despite their small RCS?

[@Tia-JadeMacdonald-sw4kd]

Is that a rainbow cockpit

[@watchinglistening]

THE F15 IS STILL RELEVANT FOR THE OBVIOUS REASONS! THE MAIN REASON BEING IT CAN LIFT AND CARRY THE LARGEST OF AIR TO GROUND MISSILES! JUST AS THE MIG31 IS DOING AGAINST UKRAINE!

[@pufflife45]

Joe Biden for me as president again if usa american dont see that then they llose in good man and one of best usa president

[@GRANDMASTEROFTHYKNIGHTST-ed9dl]

worldsmasterofspiritsknightsofchrist,tm* ready