1833-1840 Carlist War 1839-1842 First Opium War 1846-1848 Mexican-American War 1853-1856 Crimean War 1861-1865 American Civil War 1866 Austro-Prussian War 1870-1871 Franco-Prussian War 1877-1878 Russo-Turkish War 1898-1899 Spanish-American War 1904-1905 Russo-Japanese War 1910-1919 Mexican Border War 1912-1913 Balkan Wars 1914-1918 World War I 1917-1922 Russian Civil War 1927-1949 Chinese Civil War 1937-1945 Second Sino-Japanese War 1939-1945 World War II 1947-1991 Cold War 1950-1953 Korean War 1955-1975 Vietnam War 1980-1988 Iran-Iraq War 1990-1991 Gulf War 2003-2011 Iraq War 2001-Present War on Terror 2022-2023 Russo-Ukrainian War
@jammin5563 Жыл бұрын
Can you give me a prediction on how much russias budget went up between 2022-2023
@doncomuna378 Жыл бұрын
1864-1870 Paraguay War
@leandrospimpolo7439 Жыл бұрын
@@doncomuna378 esqueceram e ficou bem fora o grafico em
@doncomuna378 Жыл бұрын
@@leandrospimpolo7439 Fora ou foda?
@ivoleser Жыл бұрын
2014-2023 Russo-Ukrainian War
@hailexiao2770 Жыл бұрын
The Soviet Union spending $300 billion on defense in 1985 is insane. As a % of GDP, that's like USA or China spending $3.5 trillion on defense in 2023.
@yawnbob Жыл бұрын
Это СССР коммунизм вперед
@canadaphil6068 Жыл бұрын
One of the major reasons they bankrupted themselves while their people lived in 1 room apartments with a communal bathroom and stood in line each day for stale bread.
@SirEggo2412 Жыл бұрын
@@pumaa8416 if the USSR was so good why do majority of the eastern bloc never want to go back and tell me who ran to what side of Berlin when the wall fell?
@cadennorris960 Жыл бұрын
@@pumaa8416You’re lying to yourself. My house is made of hardie board, stucko and rebar. My roof is secured to the foundation. Every new home in my area has to be made up to a certain code set by the county. Houses around the country vary greatly. If the USSR was so great why did it collapse? Just face it, your military spent more than it should have on a futile effort and we saw the results of that in 1991. Of course that’s not the only reason the USSR collapsed.
@ALIIMLGAMING909 Жыл бұрын
Too bad thir tech was still shit ( I'm looking at you, foxbat)
@lepage7120 Жыл бұрын
800 billion dollars. Can you smell it? That smell of democracy
@n1gtwhisper1588 ай бұрын
I dont think the budget has technically increased for a long while if you factor in inflation.
@serrael-1828 ай бұрын
Yes cuz democracy lets you have this kind of economy that allowes those numbers.
@jctr43078 ай бұрын
Democracy is not peace. Don't be a child 😅
@donaldtrumplover22548 ай бұрын
Hail Democracy!!!!!!
@sleep_deprived_stormworker8 ай бұрын
*helldivers 2 intensifies*
@ashhathaway4144 Жыл бұрын
It's interesting to note that Soviet military spending surpassed the United States in 1969, and remained significantly higher throughout the 1970s. The Carter and Reagan military build-ups are noticeable in the late 1970s and into the 1980s. Excellent graphs, thank you for posting this!
@Ravie39 ай бұрын
Soviets spending more than they could afford.
@foreignfat60099 ай бұрын
@@Ravie3Nonsense, they fell due to political pressure, not economical. Stop this misinformation.. By your logic North Korea should have fallen a long time ago. Soviet citizen definitely had it better than North Korean have it now. Even starving Ukrainians had it better.
@derpidius63069 ай бұрын
@foreignfat6009 North Korea is propped up by China, if China wasn't holding their hand NK would collapse even without an external invasion
@GareBear4208 ай бұрын
@@foreignfat6009 I wonder what could have possibly contributed to the large amount of political pressure placed on the soviet regime... Definitely not anything to do with the appalling economic conditions most of the soviet citizenry found themselves in.
@foreignfat60098 ай бұрын
@@GareBear420 Maybe ridiculous amount of ethnicity and different religion? And different cultures, which were suppressed. You are forgetting that Soviet Union was union of mostly poor countries. Russia was pretty much the richest and that doesn't say much after WW1, civil wars and ww2. It was impressive what they did with a poor ruin. Again, North Korea has worse conditions for their people than most Soviet union and it didn't collapse out of economic pressure. And they won't. They need military coup or outside intervention to collapse. They don't have to deal with so much diversity. If USA swapped places geographically, they wouldn't be a superpower. USA had huge economic issues, and it didn't collapse. USA had way less diversity than Soviet union.
@pahtar7189 Жыл бұрын
These dynamic graphs are much more useful when you note major events within the video. For example starting in 1859 the US undergoes a meteoric rise then plumets after 1866. It's due to the Civil War of course, but many of the dramatic changes aren't so obvious - at least to me.
@Yegoros Жыл бұрын
1986 - Chernobyl in USSR, after that in 87 you see it that spendings in USSR began to rapidly decrease
@losarpettystrakos7687 Жыл бұрын
@@Yegoros It has nothing to do with Chernobyl. In mid 80s the Soviet Economy was already in shambles and the crisis started to accelerate rapidly.
@Yegoros Жыл бұрын
@@losarpettystrakos7687 Yes, it was in crisis in mid-80s. But you don't know communists. They will never decrease spending on the army unless something serious happens. And this serious was Chornobyl. Total loss from this catastrophe is more than 250 bln usd in today's money
@le_meme_man8983 Жыл бұрын
@@Yegoros Sure. Believe what you want
@Yegoros Жыл бұрын
@@le_meme_man8983 that's what ppl say when they have no arguments)
@bifa5414 Жыл бұрын
5:55 I like how after WWII Poland jumped straight into 3rd place
@oskich7758 Жыл бұрын
Yes, how
@bifa5414 Жыл бұрын
@@oskich7758 Because it didn't exist during war (it was occupied by Soviet Union and Germany) so after it was brought back it was spending huge portion of GDP on military. Which is interesting considering that it wasn't a totally free country for over 200 years
@atanasvasilev3228 Жыл бұрын
Thats what oppression does to people- maxes the army and economy.
@okand1921 Жыл бұрын
@@bifa5414 It was in Warsaw pact which explains military spendings)
@pootmcgoot5458 Жыл бұрын
@RyanMiller-tb6fd thats post ww2 my dude
@zacharymoye7272 Жыл бұрын
Damn, France kicked serious ass for nearly a century 😳.
@Zx17OPv57i Жыл бұрын
France was the best for long time
@ryanhampson673 Жыл бұрын
France was the strongest land army in Europe for hundred of years. They catch a lot of flak for surrendering during WW2 but they lost 92,000 troops in a matter of months and were just over run.
@ЕгорХарьковский-я9ю Жыл бұрын
@@ryanhampson673 this is not an excuse SOViet Union lost 27, 000, 000
@ryanhampson673 Жыл бұрын
@@ЕгорХарьковский-я9ю True, but lack of good Soviet commanders at the start didn’t help. Stalin purged all the good officers because he was a paranoid maniac. But as an American I do understand the great sacrifice the Soviets undertook…With huge amounts of American food and equipment to help.
@Scriptvm Жыл бұрын
Nous étions jadis un grand et beau pays..
@AmmarAlshomali Жыл бұрын
When the soviet union collapsed but still the United States didn't stop spending...
@engineerenginering86339 ай бұрын
Why would they stop? And a lot of it has to do with inflation too.
@Septimus_ii9 ай бұрын
In real terms it decreased, but not massively
@LB-jw3ly9 ай бұрын
Defense contractors didn’t collapse.
@falcon_2248 ай бұрын
@@Septimus_iiUS dollars value hasn't depreciated that much in the past 30 years
@sonikUk8 ай бұрын
China...
@SebHaarfagre Жыл бұрын
First of all, I love that the HoI3/4 soundtrack is used. Secondly, ridiculous how well it fits dynamically with the graphs?!? Third, as a history nerd, this is simply the best
@bunkerkorpf1440 Жыл бұрын
History nerd ? Kingdom of France in 1853 ? LMAO
@Joebinlaggin5139 ай бұрын
@@bunkerkorpf1440Kingdom of France ended in 1870 after the Franco-Prussian war
@Joebinlaggin5139 ай бұрын
So if you don’t believe that there was a kingdom of france in 1853 then you’re wrong
@bunkerkorpf14409 ай бұрын
@@Joebinlaggin513 There was no Kingdom of France in 1853 or 1870, youre ignorant. It was the Second Empire held by Napoleon III, a totally different thing.
@steveweidig53738 ай бұрын
@@bunkerkorpf1440 French empire would be more correct since Napoleon III was an emperor, not a king. Napoleon III choose the title of emperor over king because "King" (or "Roi" in French) has been a very unpopular title ever since the French Revolution, but otherwise was a bog-standard monarchy of the time. Simply leaving the country as France (outside of the Vichy regime) would have avoided this and would technically been correct, too.
@creanero Жыл бұрын
The brief appearance of what should be the Irish Free State (instead of the Republic of Ireland, a term that wasn't used until 1948) on this chart says something about how absurdly expensive the civil war was.
@johnwayne7673 Жыл бұрын
I was there ...the price of a pint back then I'll tell you something
@جمهوریاسلامیایران-ك5ض Жыл бұрын
خلاصه جمهوری اسلامی ایران داره بر اسرائیل پیروز میشه . نیروی های روشنایی پیروز میدان هستند
@kodiwtf8 ай бұрын
@@johnwayne7673 Can't imagine the price of a pint back in the 50s or 60s cost more, course getting the money for it would be tough. How much was it do you remember?
@victorbroquart693 Жыл бұрын
In 1856, there is no French kingdom, we were ruled by Napoleon III, the Second Empire, after Napoleon was elected as the first French president democratically elected, he declared the empire one year later.
@SebHaarfagre Жыл бұрын
There's an animation between each year. For simplicity (for the eyes), it might be better this way
@Chriswaddle77 Жыл бұрын
@Коля Красоткин oui comme Poutine
@zhaunju Жыл бұрын
@user-ct9sj3rh8p Гитлер НЕ пришел к власти на демократических выборах. Он получил место рейхсканцлера благодаря коррупционному скандалу, связанным с сука-сыночкой Гинденбурга, а партия НСДАП не получила большинства мест в парламенте, чтобы принимать решения без оглядки на другие партии. НСДАП вместо демократических процедур просто убивали депутатов других партий, ввели антиконституционный запрет на коммунистическую партию, и ввели антиконституционные законы, ограничивающие права и свободы граждан. НСДАП и Гитлер сломали демократические институты, они к своей абсолютной власти на выборах НЕ приходили - они власть ЗАХВАТИЛИ. Формально во время ВМВ у Германского рейха была конституция, гарантирующая права и свободы граждан, но НСДАП просто ее игнорировали.
@Rex_87 Жыл бұрын
@@Chriswaddle77👌thx
@bunkerkorpf1440 Жыл бұрын
1852 and after, not 1856
@richierollinrocket28917 ай бұрын
US defense budget whenever there is a war: I am speed
@Zopiexx Жыл бұрын
The Soviet Union had the lead for quite a while
@ltmammaguerillz6745 Жыл бұрын
We just weren't dick swinging for the moon cuz we weren't being pressed. Don't F with America, you watch what happens in any world war when America joins
@doncomuna378 Жыл бұрын
The USSR already had a lot of weapons before the war, so they didn't have to spend that much.
@ltmammaguerillz6745 Жыл бұрын
@Terror do Ocidente old weapons, tech is always improving and R&D innovation is why countries who stop spending fall way behind on the global scale. Seems like USA decided to conquer the planet in like 1988 and juiced the spending to like $275 billion a year and it never went down after that just straight climbed to almost a trillion dollars from then till now.
@doncomuna378 Жыл бұрын
@@ltmammaguerillz6745 The Americans realized that even though they were the number 1 power, they still weren't able to defeat half of a country that was fighting with Russian AK 47 rifles, wearing slippers, and a "drum cymbal" on their head. After the embarrassment, they started to invest madly in their armed forces, not only to displace Socialist Russia, but also to not make the same mistakes!
@hamzamahmood9565 Жыл бұрын
@@doncomuna378 Losing the political will to fight is not same as an outright military defeat. America decided it was worth keeping Japan, S.Korea and Western Europe after WW2, so we stayed. America decided it wasn't worth keeping Vietnam, Afghanistan or Iraq, so we left.
@ಠ_ಠ-ಭ2ಷ Жыл бұрын
I love how accurate the flags are
@tintin323 Жыл бұрын
Is this ironic ?
@cloroxbleach9222 Жыл бұрын
There are inaccuracies, the Ottoman Empire is it the most obvious one and another one is Austria-Hungary which more commonly used the black and gold flag Habsburg flag. It's still a lot better than other videos which just use modern flags and names though.
@yeetienusmagnus4460 Жыл бұрын
bruh wtf happened to the Belgian flag
@MiyamotoAiko Жыл бұрын
Japan's Flag during it's empire is inaccurate. The flag shown there is the Imperial Japanese Army and Navy flags. It is still used today. The corrrect flag is the same flag as modern Japan.
@asdasasada722 Жыл бұрын
@@tintin323 weimar republic = germany for example..it isnt
@USViper Жыл бұрын
1943, America put a twin turbo on the defense budget and looked in rear view
@1blackice1 Жыл бұрын
That was when America made war into a business.
@USViper Жыл бұрын
@1blackice1 War is a business in EVERY country... there is money in war. Just like Krupp steel company ww2
@omniyambot9876 Жыл бұрын
you don't mess with a country with military industrial complex or you'll learn why they don't have healthcare for asserting freedom😁
@walmars3curity8 ай бұрын
What was it before?
@dylanhoeltzel09 Жыл бұрын
Soviet Union:OK usa I'm out you can stop spending Usa:Eh,no thanks 😂😂😂😂 Edit: Holy cow that's a lot of likes Edit 2:There's a war in the replies 💀
@danilos38 Жыл бұрын
Однополярный мир полсе 1991 года , США контролировать начали всю планету в том числе за счёт баз НАТО по всему миру , а на это нужно много средств тратить . Весь мир после 1991 года колония США
@JakeTB577 Жыл бұрын
@@danilos38 Can’t defeat Ukraine??
@legocon2004 Жыл бұрын
@@danilos38 В чем дело, Иван, с ума ты проигрываешь?
@JoeXOTic Жыл бұрын
@@JakeTB577 it's a war of attrition to the western resources. Russia can make rockets rain on ukraine if they wanted to end it.
@JoeXOTic Жыл бұрын
@@danilos38 true
@Sveta7 Жыл бұрын
It's funny how people nowdays laugh at Russian performance in Ukraine and compare it to the US, which has a budget almost as big as all of these countries combined... Russia is not the Soviet Union anymore and it's doing quite well considering.
@JBlack7027 Жыл бұрын
It's crazy how quickly the US can dwarf other nations in military spending when we gear up for war.
@Messerschmitt_BF_109G_10 Жыл бұрын
In just 10 seconds, 1:28 - 1:38, we went from like $140,000,000 to $2.3 BILLION
@brettk9316 Жыл бұрын
🇺🇸 💪 being rich helps 🤑 💰
@T.Hebert Жыл бұрын
@@Messerschmitt_BF_109G_10 A civil war does that to you I guess
@AndrewJ9673 Жыл бұрын
one of the difficult questions in history is when specifically the United States became a Great Power and when they became a "Superpower". I usually look at the history of the Civil War and argue that if there was ever a point where the US was considered one of the strongest countries on Earth, then it must be before the Civil War, because the amount mobilized for a *civil war* and not even a war against another major power was insane, and dwarfs a lot of the rest of the world.
@TheJollyKraut Жыл бұрын
@@brettk9316 You aren't rich. It's all bought with debts. Debts that your grandchildren will have to pay off...
@sof5858 Жыл бұрын
It would have been interesting to split the US with Confederacy during the Civil War.
@ЕленаВасильева-н7щ Жыл бұрын
лучше,чтоб америка исчезла.
@davidlucas555011 ай бұрын
@@ЕленаВасильева-н7щЧестно говоря, вы завидуете, вы ненавидите США только потому, что они номер 1, честно говоря, я мечтаю, чтобы Россия и США заставили Китай и все остальное исчезнуть, а я бразилец, в моей стране полно коммунистов, вот таких ослов , ты знаешь? Они не такие, как Путин, который любит свою страну, люди здесь все разрушают, убивают экономику, у них нет даже хорошего военного планирования, поэтому мне бы очень хотелось быть на стороне России и США, если Если бы Трамп был у власти в США, было бы несколько соглашений, как и у них, и сделали бы больше..
@ЕленаВасильева-н7щ11 ай бұрын
@@davidlucas5550 ,вот честно,никакой зависти к Америке или еще к какой стране вообще нет у россиян,честно-всем пофиг.Пофиг,это когда безразлично,когда ты не думаешь об этом.Америка-международный бандит,страна,которая несет горе и войны по всей планете.Поэтому Америку ненавидит большая половина человечества.Кстати,в России Бразилию любят,у нас есть юмористический фильм"Здравствуйте,я ваша тетя"Там богатая тетушка приехала из Бразилии,где много диких обезьян"😁,и теперь большинство россиян так и думают,что обезьяна-ваше основное животное😁Ну а еще у вас весело,солнечно,Пеле👍
@davidlucas555011 ай бұрын
@@ЕленаВасильева-н7щсмешно, ну меня не волнуют никакие обиды, честно говоря, мне кажется, что это смешно, но это правда чувак, к сожалению ничего хорошего отсюда не выходит, умные те, кто отсюда выходят.
@davidlucas555011 ай бұрын
@@ЕленаВасильева-н7щ Поэтому я сказал, что мечтаю, чтобы США и Россия покончили со всем остальным.
@FyL4311 ай бұрын
France is pretty stable all the time, but we can see that it never manages to adapt quickly enough compared to other countries
@Bracus.Reghusk11 ай бұрын
False just study the use of new equipment during the First World War.
@roronoazoro297010 ай бұрын
@@Bracus.Reghuskhow does the implementation of new equipment in a single war have to do with their defense budget throughout the past 200 years?? You’re talking about apples when the other dude is talking about oranges 😂
@Bracus.Reghusk10 ай бұрын
@@roronoazoro2970 The use of new equipment come the implementation of new strategies and organisation just study This is a fascinating subject, and it shows that the French army has been at the forefront of innovation and adaptation, the basic comment is just either bad faith or ignorance.
@xxdarkphoenixxx110 ай бұрын
@@roronoazoro2970 In fact you can learn how the french modify the army mobility between 14 and 18. They just blow away the standard of the time
@Ltasty Жыл бұрын
Would also be interesting to see this adjusted with PPP. In US dollars alone it doesn't give a true representation of military expenditure. China and Russia's for example is likely at least double when you consider PPP.
@matrioxraven1929 Жыл бұрын
Se hace en dolares para ver el gasto real de todos por igual
@AbdulGoodLooks Жыл бұрын
I totally agree, but Purchasing Power Parity is calculated using consumer goods. It doesn't really tell us how much cheaper military equipment, personnel, and research are for other countries vs the US. We would probably need a different metric to properly compare them.
@Ltasty Жыл бұрын
@@AbdulGoodLooks you're still going to get a far better representation using PPP than you are merely using dollars.
@marcusgarveyson Жыл бұрын
🇺🇸 military spending is equal to money laundering . it hasn't made the us military 10x more powerful than Afghanistan a country thats not even in the top 10
@AOSMAKAKMS Жыл бұрын
@@Ltasty gdp
@ak-12ejoyer52 Жыл бұрын
The video is good, but it has a lot of mistakes. One of the big mistakes I've noticed is the hugely inflated country budgets for 1898, which were actually ~3 times lower than shown in the video. Also one of the big mistakes - the Russian military budget for 1994, which could not be equal to 94 billion dollars (which was more than the country's total budget for that year, lmao) and was actually about 13 billion dollars.
@matsi1944 Жыл бұрын
And the Belgian flag 😮🤦
@Alex_R8810 ай бұрын
я думаю, это все в перерасчете на сегодняшние деньги
@millionelectricvolts611710 ай бұрын
@@Alex_R88 So, adjusted for inflation? Probably is what happened
@drrizzla4557 Жыл бұрын
just a detail but from 1852 to 1870 France was named "Second Empire" and not "Kingdom" anymore (even if the Second Empire is considered as a parliamentary monarchy)
@dontcare5319 Жыл бұрын
Yeah and from 1848 to 1852 it was the second french republic
@amin36811 ай бұрын
UK 1948: Poland what hell are you doing Poland: sorry I'm going back now
@LeoSag-b7p9 ай бұрын
Poland was totally destroyed and had to rebuild itself without any foreign help.
@Septimus_ii9 ай бұрын
@@LeoSag-b7p In 1948 they had an awful lot of Soviet 'help'. Nothing from their supposed allies in the West, though :(
@Pospolite-Ruszenie8 ай бұрын
The west wanted to help, but the Soviets refuses. That’s also why Poland didn’t get any financial reparations from Germany. The Soviets didn’t allow it.
@koulematon73598 ай бұрын
@@Septimus_iiIt was the Soviets that rejected the Marshall Plan for us. They thought Lenin magic would be enough, and it wasn't.
@aaravdiwakaristhebestАй бұрын
@@Septimus_iiit was still help tho, help is help
@stevejones4010 Жыл бұрын
Brilliant video and music as always, thanks 👍
@ayazhuma4511 Жыл бұрын
Fake knowledge 😂😂 channel World no1 usa
@aierluscher11 ай бұрын
bro no english? @@ayazhuma4511
@billyoconnell6669 Жыл бұрын
Imagine if all that money was used to improve people's lives instead of destroying them
@RickySpanish12344 Жыл бұрын
An unfortunate reality.
@ellidominusser1138 Жыл бұрын
Impossible
@CTE-RAPAS Жыл бұрын
then how do you defend against ennemy with rock and stick ?
@MBGA123 Жыл бұрын
You have to provide security for them first
@ellidominusser1138 Жыл бұрын
@@MBGA123 Well, the problem is, you don't need a 700 billion+ investment into military to protect your nation. Unless you consider invading other countries for their resources as "protecting our people"
@sakukullberg2697 Жыл бұрын
Wow, Prussia was so efficient with its military spending.
@phoepyae4577 Жыл бұрын
Wait wait Myanmar was higher than Russia and Italy once? No way..
@smonyboy Жыл бұрын
while definitely not higher than that of the US, some analysts believe china's actual military spending is understated
@RickySpanish12344 Жыл бұрын
Very true, but I'd imagine the U.S. has black budget projects as well.
@smonyboy Жыл бұрын
@@EricChien95 The fact that you're using military bases as a means of saying the numbers for both US and China are accurate is about as accurate as your reading abilities.
@りんごT-i3t Жыл бұрын
A Chinese military base poses a serious threat to the United States
@xy-inventor1885 Жыл бұрын
@Ricky “you really think the US is spending 50,000 dollars on a hammer”
@RickySpanish12344 Жыл бұрын
@@xy-inventor1885 Yeah. If a politician is taking money from the hammer company
@simonsonne4741 Жыл бұрын
Everyone is "war over let's stop spending so much on our military" USA: "hold my beer"
@gamerreloadedofficial4465 Жыл бұрын
France hit different
@МагомедрасулКанаматов Жыл бұрын
США тратит миллионы долларов чтобы создать ручку которая пишет в космосе, а Россия тратит 10центов,и берет с собой обычный карандаш, вот и разница в расходах
@МстящаяОбезьяна Жыл бұрын
Сейчас сюда придёт какой-нибудь умник и напишет об грифеле от карандаша(что он опасен в условиях невесомости и ограниченной влажности)... Карандаши на космических станциях СССР были - восковые. Правда космическую ручку СССР всё-таки купил у США. Восковые карандаши пишут очень уж размыто.
@KrauserAMG Жыл бұрын
Russia's army budget is several times smaller than that of the United States, but at the same time Russia holds the status of the 2nd army in the world in power. Just imagine what Russia would do with the US budget 💀
@undefined7704 Жыл бұрын
ты же понимаешь что она считаеться второй армией мира из-за количества населения и ядерного оружия в первую очередь ?
@KrauserAMG Жыл бұрын
@@undefined7704 ну вообще запад очень часто восхищался своей техникой и постоянно говорил как она сокрушит Россию при войне, тем самым пытаясь поставить Россию "на место" . А оказалось, что дорогая техника запада не справляется с дешёвыми, немного улучшенными танками СССР. А если говорить про дисциплину то в России она очевидно лучше. Ядерные ракеты ты вообще можешь не включать в военную силу, их все равно никто не применит.
@affdafwfwa11 ай бұрын
2nd army in the world in power yet can't even win against Ukraine LMFAO
@WUNDER_BUILDER11 ай бұрын
@@affdafwfwawithout NATO help, Ukrain would lost in month. Without starlink and NATO satellits and artillery and ect, they cant defeat Russia
@Ya_Tut_Ne_Pri_Chem11 ай бұрын
@@affdafwfwa I could be wrong, but the entire Russian army is not at war with Ukraine, only part of the 2nd army of the world is located there
@anthony9thompson Жыл бұрын
Why do I find this so exciting to watch ?
@drksideofthewal Жыл бұрын
And this is peacetime US spending. It can still skyrocket if it needs to.
@ellidominusser1138 Жыл бұрын
It can still pour countless billions into pointless wars if it wants to
@EricChien95 Жыл бұрын
We got infinite money baby, our money are propped up by our military and other countries rely on it. If they don't want our defense well they are in trouble.
@ellidominusser1138 Жыл бұрын
@@EricChien95 150% debt to gdp ratio 🙃
@dns7587 Жыл бұрын
if you see the pattern most budgets spiked before empire fall!
@willjapheth237899 ай бұрын
Well the industries that make military supplies can be pretty advanced and cannot be scaled quickly, so the days of sudden military spending seem to be over, now you need a standing military big enough to support advanced industry. And rely on stock piles of weapons.
@gamingshowerthoughts972310 ай бұрын
For a split second in 1990 when Germany unifies the music changes and Germany starts climbing and its like wait are we doing this again????
@jarq19 Жыл бұрын
Now I understand why the People's Army of Poland was the same size (or even larger?) than the British Army at the time.
@epheboss637010 ай бұрын
There was nothin like that
@impastaissus1522 Жыл бұрын
it’s interesting that the eastern block countries also had quite a lot spent on he military during the start of cold war
@Vector-f6y Жыл бұрын
Меня это тоже удивило, если место Чехословакии можно объяснить, у неё и так была сильная военная промышленность ещё до вм2 то, как ГДР мог столько тратить, наверно деньги советы довели.
@__MU_MU__ Жыл бұрын
The United States has more than 730 military bases around the world Media:Our world is threatened by Russia😂
@marcovidal9782 Жыл бұрын
“Our world” = NATO and Russia is still a threat although not as remotely as dangerous as China. We’re still coming off that high of being the worlds sole superpower for almost 80 years.
@brok1589 Жыл бұрын
Well, it's ruled by scared dictator with 10k nukes
@GhhYuuu-f6f Жыл бұрын
@@brok1589 6k
@brandonf1260 Жыл бұрын
Mm but the US isn't the one invading it's neighbors and disrupting the economic stability of the world.
@eric.1948 Жыл бұрын
We need a video of total gdp towards military i think that explains more.
@nicolaspeigne1429 Жыл бұрын
I guess having the power to be totally in debt but still spend massive amounts of money inflated the numbers in modern times
@SebHaarfagre Жыл бұрын
In modern times? Standing armies is a relatively new thing, before that, countries bankrupted themselves thrice over using mercenaries (and sometimes benefited in the long run)
@nicolaspeigne1429 Жыл бұрын
@@SebHaarfagre except countries were actually expected to pay their debt back, and since their currency was based on the amount of gold they actually had, they couldn't borrow that much when they were bankrupted
@ni9274 Жыл бұрын
It doesn’t matter that you’re in debt if you can pay the rate
@lred1383 Жыл бұрын
build up a big enough army and you ascend past the global economy, because you can simply not pay your bills and they can't take the money from you. They'll actually be paying you to keep to yourself
@commanderstorm88748 ай бұрын
I like how you can tell whenever America was involved in a war because the defense budget would always shoot into the stratosphere
@jjthai1 Жыл бұрын
For a country that "doesn't have army", Japan sure do spend a lot.
@masterchief2402 Жыл бұрын
What Japan never claimed they don’t have an army. In fact in 2022 Japan stated they are remilitarizing the nation and seeking more U.S technology and aircraft.
@ernestogastelum9123 Жыл бұрын
@@masterchief2402 Japan did claim they dont have army and they only had a defensive force until they decided to change in 2022.
@masterchief2402 Жыл бұрын
@@ernestogastelum9123 yeah because under the treaty they signed they were allowed to have a defence force only after ww2
Жыл бұрын
Technically, they didn't claim anything. Their Constitution did so. And their Constitution is a US forced Constitution for obvious reasons.
@Har1ByWorld11 ай бұрын
@@masterchief2402 SO THEY DID CLAIM THEY DONT HAVE AN ARMY
@opa_chirik Жыл бұрын
СССР после разрушительной войны на его территории; догнал США, которые на войне заработали большие деньги, получили огромное количество талантливых учёных со всего мира и стали огромнейшей силой. Уважение Сталину и всем кто участвовал в восстановлении огромной страны-победительницы.
@Zornyi11 ай бұрын
Только вот обычный народ в ссср изза больших расходов на армию жил хцже
@danilhandrikin385311 ай бұрын
@@Zornyiага, настолько хуже что пробабушка хочет вернуться во времена 60 годов(вплоть до 85) до сих пор у них москвич стоит подаренный государством в отличии от пендосии где бедность достигает огромных цифр. В москве такого нет сколько в нью йорке или вашингтоне. Не было. Капиталистам этого не понять, вы только о деньгах думаете. А щас стране победительнице памятники сносят, и строят музеи о том какой сталин был тиран как в Польше, или же нарния, кхм украина, где герб ссср снесли со статуи и поставили бандеровский трезубец. Справедливость. Ага. Траты им млять.
@ISunsetShimmer11 ай бұрын
@@Zornyi, и как он страдал? Приведи факты.
@velsark11 ай бұрын
@@ISunsetShimmerтолько дурачок потребует факты в данном вопросе.
@BibEvgen11 ай бұрын
@@Zornyi Жил хуже, чем кто? Советские люди помнили, что сделали европейцы в СССР, поэтому вкладывались в оборону. Мы сегодня видим, западный гражданин после начала спец операции уже знал, кто враг, а многие Россиянине до сих пор живут в илюзиях.
@poyloos4834 Жыл бұрын
Someone needs to tell the US that the Cold War ended a couple decades ago. And you still get people in there saying they need to put more money into army?! It’s insane!
@redragek Жыл бұрын
Угарнул с русско-японской войны, когда японцы быстро нарастили военный бюджет и так же быстро сократили после победы)) интересный народ японцы
@МстящаяОбезьяна Жыл бұрын
Если почитать как японцы пополняли этот бюджет, то жуть берет. Обычные японцы в порыве патриотизма продавали всю нормальную одежду(сами же после этого ходили в дешевых бумажных кимоно для покойников), своих жен и дочерей закладывали в бордели а вырученные с этого средства отдавали на нужды фронта.
@redragek Жыл бұрын
@@МстящаяОбезьяна печальное зрелище. Да и сейчас им не сладко в плане демографии
@Вова-ш3ю Жыл бұрын
@@redragek Хрен с мухосранска жалеет японцев 😂
@redragek Жыл бұрын
@@Вова-ш3ю 😅😂🤣🤣😂😅😝😜🤡
@Vedmed88 Жыл бұрын
Еврейские богачи помогли, тогда в России была черта оседлости и они дали Японии денег на войну
@user-glg20 Жыл бұрын
Poland spends a lot of money on the army. The problem is that it is in a bad situation, because its main historical enemies (Russia and Germany) usually spend more.
@George_Wong Жыл бұрын
Germany is currently having its military rearmament stuck in their stupid bureaucracy, while Russia is being tied down by Ukraine.
@anonymerdude4501 Жыл бұрын
We Germans are not your enemies anymore bro
@weaver1507 Жыл бұрын
Respect to Poland and god bless, Korea is in a similar situation (Japs and Chinese).
@vinoalvin9924 Жыл бұрын
And still german control EU 😂 Its not diffrent
@youareliedtobythemedia Жыл бұрын
@@vinoalvin9924 they don't.
@Rockiestmage8 ай бұрын
It's like... you can almost smell the exact second someone touched our boats
@hypnomarket8649 Жыл бұрын
The most peaceful country in the world with a military budget of half the world. This is so cute
@ellidominusser1138 Жыл бұрын
USA? Peaceful?
@hypnomarket8649 Жыл бұрын
@@ellidominusser1138 sorry, it's kind of sarcasm right here
@ostiariusalpha Жыл бұрын
@@hypnomarket8649 Stupid sarcasm then. Nobody in the U.S. is claiming that we're Denmark, pal.
@ellidominusser1138 Жыл бұрын
@@hypnomarket8649 dw, i know
@yuluoxianjun Жыл бұрын
@@ostiariusalpha no.USA always say China is too aggresive
@Zopiexx Жыл бұрын
5:15 No no Germany
@jammin5563 Жыл бұрын
HANS WHERE IS ZA PANERKAMPFWAGONS
@BenjaminMilekowsky Жыл бұрын
Nein nein nein
@jammin5563 Жыл бұрын
@@BenjaminMilekowsky nein nein nein say it like zist NEIN NEIN NEIN!
@odyssey28294 ай бұрын
Bruh a billion dollars in the 1800s. Wonder how much that will be now
@edududu470511 ай бұрын
Você vê que tudo está tranquilo quando o Brasil se encontra no gráfico 😅😂
@Murasaki64 Жыл бұрын
When budgets work, history is made.
@jonathanbourke3059 ай бұрын
Soviet Union: "Let's spend a lot on the military." Third Reich: "Hold mein Bier." USA: "Put down your beer and hold both of mine."
@HeritageStacking Жыл бұрын
Did not expect to see Canada on here.
@wewantthegoldsuckah6317 Жыл бұрын
Pressured by world police usa to arm up against the new world order BRICS or mainly Russia china and India
@Ravie39 ай бұрын
Canada, the most forgotten world power. World’s 9th largest economy, almost 40 million people, but totally forgotten as a power both now and in the past due to proximity and always being in alliance with the US and UK.
@HeritageStacking9 ай бұрын
@Ravie3 I live in Canada I knew we had the 5th largest army in ww2 at the end. I just did not realize how powerful we are. On a side note one of indias Carriers was the HMCS Bonaventure.
@michaelneuwirth3414 Жыл бұрын
🇬🇧 The differentiation into the Kingdom of Prussia and Bavaria, the German Empire, the Weimar Republic, Nazi Germany, West and East Germany and since 1990 Germany for the geographical area of Germany reflects the political situation very accurately. In the case of Great Britain, on the other hand, I am simply missing the countries of the British Empire or the Commonwealth. A category NATO or Warsaw Pact would also reflect the historical events of the time more accurately. The same applies to the more than 50 states of the Ukaine Contact Group. In general, I consider the consideration of military expenditures to be much more meaningful than many other explanations for the course of history, so: Thank you for this YT video! 🇩🇪 Die Differenzierung in Königreich Preussen und Bayern, deutsches Kaiserreich, Weimarer Republik, Nazi-Germany, West- und Ost-Deutschland und seit 1990 Deutschland für den geographischen Raum Deutschland gibt die politische Situation sehr exakt wieder. Bei Großbritannien hingegen fehlen mir schlichtweg die Länder des Britischen Empire bzw. des Commonwealth. Eine Kategorie NATO bzw. Warschauer Pakt würde das historische Zeitgeschehen ebenfalls genauer widerspiegeln. Gleiches gilt für die über 50 Staaten der Ukaine-Kontaktgruppe. Die Betrachtung von Militärausgaben halte ich generell für viel aussagekräftiger, als manch andere Erklärung für den Gang der Geschichte, deshalb: Danke für dieses YT-Video!
@tigerland432811 ай бұрын
I think this is just for the UK not the entire British empire. Also the UK has existed since 1801 (apart from a slight name change when most of Ireland left the Union in 1922) so the term "UK" or "United Kingdom" is correct as opposed to Germany which had many names during this time frame
@i3lackfusion8 ай бұрын
Its not flawless though, considering that nazi Germany wasn’t really a thing before 34
@octoman_games Жыл бұрын
Fascinating seeing empires rise and fall.
@Ankitcse913 Жыл бұрын
UK's Budget decreased instantly when INDIA got Independant😂
@vatsal7640 Жыл бұрын
Oh god another indian natinalist. You can clearly see the numbers growing, not decreasing even after India's independence
@priyashmukherjee Жыл бұрын
@@vatsal7640OH GOD ANOTHER INDIAN HATER. PROUD TO BE AN INDIAN NATIONALIST.
@vatsal7640 Жыл бұрын
@@priyashmukherjee cringe af. And who said I was an indian hater??
@knockoutanimatez-h4p2 ай бұрын
Who cares
@parzival4159 Жыл бұрын
Полный бред, начиная с единиц измерения заканчивая фактическими противоречиями... Отцы автора - отличные мужики!
@TheDude504478 ай бұрын
Its a bit insane when its visualized like this how with basically no threat the US is spending a godless amount of money on weapons.
@rushman66698 ай бұрын
Just for the country to fall to a civil war in the future😂
@commentsnipper Жыл бұрын
Russia and France historically spend a lot on military.
@Big_Caesar1 Жыл бұрын
Thanks Einstein
@АлексейВитушкин-з3у Жыл бұрын
Сразу понятно какая страна самая миролюбивая и демократичная😂
@dissensiohola8994 Жыл бұрын
СССР 30-х годов, конечно. Сразу видно - стремился к миру)
@yuluoxianjun Жыл бұрын
@@dissensiohola8994 USSR in 1930s control Mogolia to be independent from China.I dont think it is a Peaceful thing
@МстящаяОбезьяна Жыл бұрын
@@dissensiohola8994 в 30-х годах все были такие милые и пушистые. И ТОЛЬКО СТАЛИН...
@brucemon45255 ай бұрын
我们迟早要拿回外兴安岭和库页岛@@МстящаяОбезьяна
@SpitfireMLG9 ай бұрын
I had no idea Poland and West Germany had a higher military spending than Britain during the second half of the 20th century
@flankana Жыл бұрын
can we get a navy size comparison?
@becalelbecalelew726211 ай бұрын
То есть по видео получается, что процентально относительно годов военные расходы СССР в довоенные годы и военные почти не отличаются? Серьёзно?
@Submarino1811 ай бұрын
No one realized we could spent all that money for build roads, pay decent salary or investigate new technologies. In stead of that we spent trilllions on killing ourself 🗿 SHEET
@galinrashkov7645 Жыл бұрын
After the 2010s there is no explainable reason for USA to hold so high military budget. Compared to the others, they could easily half it.
@fivegiga5523 Жыл бұрын
@Galin Rashkov@ And you will guarantee bad boy Pootinkov won't do anything against us ? ? ?
@galinrashkov7645 Жыл бұрын
@@fivegiga5523 This kind of mindset leads to the world problems. If everybody is afraid of it's neighbours, tension will rise
@lalibellahorne Жыл бұрын
Hm, with crazy ape like rasha, you've got to be alert.
@Simracingisgoated Жыл бұрын
alot of it doesnt really go the armed forces
@night_surfer5818 Жыл бұрын
USA preparing for another invasion coz money 💸💸🤑🤑
@liuyuzhi11 ай бұрын
I'm curious. Even the Qing Dynasty itself didn't know how much its military expenditure was. Where did you hear that? Did the emperor tell you this personally when you traveled back in time to 1830?
@tarmnv9 ай бұрын
While I do not know the exact answer for Qing Dynasty case, but most of "spending" cases in history were taken from the book records from trading guilds. They always have a very good record about what when and how much was sold. And they've been keeping their ledgers for centuries. Similarly, some of the spending can be calculated from the known proportions. Like you've got a record from smith's guild about number of armor suits ordered. You can use this record and a knowledge about typical soldier's gear to estimate the rest of the spendings.
@liuyuzhi9 ай бұрын
@@tarmnv Maybe you know about the guilds, but you definitely don’t know about the Qing Dynasty
@AlanHsing-u3p27 күн бұрын
@@liuyuzhi Pretty much the Qing Dynasty was extremely wealthy in the 17-18 thousands and when the Qing-Ming War, Taiping Rebellion began the Qing Dynasty threw tons of money into their military and won both wars.
@jillsanchez708511 ай бұрын
First country to have a military budget of 1b+: Usa(1860) Second country to have a military budget of 1b+: Russia(1876) Third country to have a military budget of 1b+: United Kingdom(1898) Fourth country to have a military budget of 1b+: Japan(1903) Fifth country to have a military budget of 1b+: Germany(1903) Sixth Country to have a military budget of 1b+: France(1906) Seventh Country to have a military budget of 1b+: Austria-Hungary(1912) Eighth Country to have a military budget of 1b+: Italy(1935) Ninth country to have a military budget of 1b+: Canada(1939) Tenth country to have a military budget of 1b+: Australia(1942)
@startledhamster10 ай бұрын
Things I'm taking from this 1. Biggest USA export is war 2. Yugoslavia at one point had 7th largest military budget. No wonder west did everything it could to get rid of balkan super power. 3. Czechoslovakia, same as Yugoslavia. West doesn't like Slavic superpowers
@DataDiveCH Жыл бұрын
It was great. Keep going👍
@ahme_D20 Жыл бұрын
Germany:back to back slowly👀 The world :hah?!
@Asfgjjgdtyuir Жыл бұрын
Интересно как считали бюджет раньше без интернета телефона, все секретно, королевство и т.д.
@toptroll7264 Жыл бұрын
По этому графику я понял, что правители это куры, кто то единовременно подбрасывает в определенный курятник еду, в курятник, который выгодно подбрасывать на данном этапе. А жратву кидают инвесторы
@le3le8 Жыл бұрын
It's just that Gorbachev came to power just in 1985 and America bought him, he decided to destroy the Union. Since then, everything has gone downhill. He himself did not begin to live in destroyed Russia, the remnants of the empire that he destroyed, preferred to live and go to another world in Germany. Yeltsin has more conscience and honor, although he began to abuse alcohol, he tried to correct what Gorbachev left him, it was Yeltsin who recommended Putin to the West, for which we thank him!
@willjapheth237899 ай бұрын
How did Gorbachev convince so many soviet republics to leave in just 5 years? Wow that's really impressive.
@adambalog74326 ай бұрын
Oh yes Putin. Such a great guy. He wouldnt start a war. Right?
@timminh4687 ай бұрын
Now do one about national debt that would be interesting
@DontKnow-hr5my Жыл бұрын
1921: The Soviet Union definitely was not starting to arm themselves for the next ~10 years, was surely purely peaceful defensive intentions
@soggmeisterlasagnagarfield Жыл бұрын
Stalin gave a speech (can’t remember the date pre-WW2). Something like “Everything the West has done in the last century, we will have to do in a decade.”
@brianlong2334 Жыл бұрын
The Russians had more tanks, aircraft artillery, and AT guns along with most other land and air based equipment than any other nation in ww2 in 1941.... Considerably more they anyone else at a minimum of 2x the next closest, also just because you spend more money doesn't necessarily mean you spent it right, militaries are notorious for wasting money.
@DontKnow-hr5my Жыл бұрын
@@brianlong2334 It just shows they were preparing for something, it always was the Soviets Plan to roll into Europe, they tried in the Interwar Period after WW1 but got beaten by Poland. Something a lot of people tend to overlook. They were arming themselves since their creation for that.
@glebkomentator Жыл бұрын
@@DontKnow-hr5my You are somewhat mistaken on a couple of points. First. Soviet Russia (and later the USSR) from the very moment of its creation in 1917 was surrounded by a huge number of enemies (almost the entire capitalist world), and in the same Russian civil war of 1918-1922, 15 capitalist countries came out on the side of the Whites (supporters of the capitalist regime), in including the USA, France, Great Britain, Germany, Turkey, etc. The USSR was not preparing for "something". The Soviet people were preparing to defend themselves against the threat from the West (as history shows, they did the right thing). The second point is about the Soviet-Polish war 1919-1921. Do you know that Poland was the first to open hostilities by attacking the Belarusian SSR and wanting to return the old territories of Poland from the time of the Commonwealth? Russia, again, was on the defensive, and it did not "tried" anywhere in Europe. I feel you have clearly anti-soviet sources, because if you yourself studied all this, you would not say such a thing. Learn real history, comrade!
@DontKnow-hr5my Жыл бұрын
@@glebkomentator It was already Lenins and the Communists intention to free Europe first, so of course they wanted to have an army to throw fists with Europe in an offensive way and come out on top if necessary and all that arming was happening a good more than 10 years before Hitler even came to power, mind you. You seem quite bias'd in favor of the Soviet Union and no, i do not like the neoliberal capitalist system we have now either.
@ddr3629 Жыл бұрын
Next year military, security and secret spendings in Russia are $ 140 billions. Taking into account PPP = 5 (you can buy five times more goods on one dollar in Russia), we get "effective" budget approx $700 billions which is comparable to US military spending.
@ВладимирЧепурных-ф3ю11 ай бұрын
Ну, все-таки это немного не так Но в принципе, Россия переориентировалась на континентальную войну И сейчас явно не будет более лучшей армии на континенте
@Septimus_ii9 ай бұрын
I don't think applying ppp onto military spending is quite that simple at the best of times, and especially not to a semi-isolated economy as Russia is in 2022 and 2023. The evidence has been that Russia isn't able to get the same military effectiveness out of 1/5 the budget of the US.
@ayanami_gaizi9 ай бұрын
It's amazing that Japan was able to come back in a few decades even though almost all of its military was disbanded after the war.
@yuluoxianjun8 ай бұрын
cold tip:75% of steel.80% of oil Japanese used to invade Asia is supported by USA
@HappyPlaysWasTaken7 ай бұрын
Why is the mexican flag backwards
@Виктор-и8с4ы11 ай бұрын
Сколько денег впустую выброшено.
@Zesmas Жыл бұрын
the funny thing is, the US military budget is 800 Billion, but they almost always spend well above that anyway, in 2022, they spent over 1 trillion dollars.
@ЛадаЛосева-щ9й Жыл бұрын
Прекрасно❤ всё очень наглядно и ясно. Спасибо за видео!
@bilboriches7216 Жыл бұрын
Що тобі тут ясно, кацап? Ясно те що Україна вам ввалює гівна по самі гладни.
@Armmag Жыл бұрын
Ясно, що русні пизда)
@AlexKoso Жыл бұрын
вот именно. очень интересная ситуация. Почему "самая мирная страна" - СССР в 1943, 1944, 1945 годах тратила меньше, чем в 1945, 1946, 1947 годах? :)
@ЛадаЛосева-щ9й Жыл бұрын
@@AlexKoso потому что самые светлые мозги рождаются именно в России. Например, пенициллин в США был изобретён раньше, но стоил дороже, чем впоследствии разработка пенициллина в СССР. И так - по всей остальной продукции. То же самое и сейчас - все виды нашего вооружения намного дешевле, чем во всех других странах мира. Что свидетельствует об уникальности человеческого материала в нашей самой лучшей на планете стране.
@AlexKoso Жыл бұрын
@@ЛадаЛосева-щ9й завязывайте с нацизмом. Вам это ни к лицу :)
@nr5015 Жыл бұрын
Помните дети, что бы распространять демократию, нужна сильная армия
@giacomu1 Жыл бұрын
Naberi Putina I skaji emu kak i shto a to on vas ugrobit do poslednevo.
@ottovonbismarck1453 Жыл бұрын
И очень много бомб, желательно напалм)
@gamer. Жыл бұрын
@@giacomu1 🤮 Сколько Украина даёт *(десятков тысяч долларов)* семье при рождении ребёнка ? *Материнский капитал в России* - с 1 февраля 2022 года размер материнского капитала на ребенка 👉 на первого - *524.500 рублей* ... или _262.250_ гривен 👉 на второго - *693.100 рублей* ... или _346.550_ гривен
@MarkyMarkWalberg Жыл бұрын
@@giacomu1 tochno ugrobit, uje v Odesse daje za poslednimi alkashami voenkomat gonyaetsa na giroskuterah. Ruki krutyat, potom daut sapogi, avtomat i gonyat na pulemeti v Bahmut)))
@АнтонКагерман-к9м Жыл бұрын
Советский Союз 1930ых:Я что для тебя какая то шутка?
@theIroncane Жыл бұрын
The most entertaining and captivating video I've ever watched 😅
@petramussloriuberweisen2903 Жыл бұрын
I love how in 1980 Yugoslavia isnt in the list but it was the 3rd strongest army at that time
@simonsimonovic4478 Жыл бұрын
3rd strongest army??? Where? Maybe it was 9th strongest army in Europe, after USSR, UK, France, West Germany, Spain, Italy, Poland, Turkey
@GegeDxD Жыл бұрын
@@simonsimonovic4478 In the world. One fo the reason they destroyed that country. Spain, Italy, Poland? 🤭 Ok, we understand now with who we talking.
@simonsimonovic4478 Жыл бұрын
@@GegeDxD Poland had 50 % bigger population then Yugoslavia. They had much more tanks, Armored Vehicles, artillery peaces, Aircraft, helicopters etc etc... Italy and Spain were 3 to 4 times bigger then Yugoslavia. Outside Europe, Egypt, Iran, Pakistan, India, Korea, China, Japan etc... All had much stronger armies then Jugoslavia
@ravenaloro1767 Жыл бұрын
what the fck even is yugoslavia?
@maroszukaro9082 Жыл бұрын
@@GegeDxD you understand nothing 🤡 Poland was the front of Warsaw Pact, and not only supposed to hold off western countries alone before ZSSR army showed up in case of conventional attack of NATO, but also used military to control population internally. It was easily top 5-6 army in Europe, maybe higher, way ahead of yugoslavia. Dont know bout Spain and Italy, but judging by pure budget, its easy to assume they were much better too.
@tianyilee2500 Жыл бұрын
i found saudi arabia invote more budgets on army, it must be a very strong country.🙃
@roronoazoro297010 ай бұрын
They’re military isn’t well trained and they have no combat experience, they spend money just to look good haha
@tianyilee250010 ай бұрын
@@roronoazoro2970haha, true dude
@ir0n714 Жыл бұрын
USA in 1991: *I DIDN'T HEAR NO BELL*
@Ankitcse913 Жыл бұрын
UK's Budget instantly Increased after capturing INDIA (which was world's 25% GDP)
@vatsal7640 Жыл бұрын
Bro uk already had an massive military budget before the conquest. What do you think Britain was able to conquer india in the fitst place
@sohenmondal5471 Жыл бұрын
@@vatsal7640 here comes the brown sepoy . This is not conlony age .
@vatsal7640 Жыл бұрын
@@sohenmondal5471 here comes another indian nationalist who thinks everybody with different opinion is a sepoy. Bruh seriously when will you guys grow up??
@indiafirst3676 Жыл бұрын
@@vatsal7640 India back in the 19th century was divided into several kingdoms and hence it was easy to conquer fragmented kingdoms one by one which is what Brits did. Had India been unified then it would never had been directly colonized. India's situation would have been something like China in the 'Century of Humiliation'
@vatsal764011 ай бұрын
@@indiafirst3676agreed, but India would have still lost.
@lexxkrt Жыл бұрын
важно не количество денег, а качество вооружения
@Alpharius__Omegon11 ай бұрын
качество понятие размытое. В войне решает количество
@pickle659911 ай бұрын
@@Alpharius__Omegonне всегда.
@Вова-и6ь5с9 ай бұрын
@@pickle6599в современной войне именно количество решает, потому что качество у всех примерно одинаковое
@TaxmanTV Жыл бұрын
Best is watching late 80's when USSR lost the cold war and evaporate off the chart.
@kostjification11 ай бұрын
США - тратит космические суммы на армию, 2022 год тоже США - " у нас нет снарядов , мало танков и самолетов чтобы противостоять Росии".Похоже США - самое корумпированое государство в мире, деньги в никуда.😂
@VOSMIBITNIYDED10 ай бұрын
Все у них есть, просто выгодно затягивать конфликт
@androidgames16028 ай бұрын
Та блин, они что ли планируют вести долгую войну с кем-то? Им эти самые снаряды не нужны, так как по сути они годятся только для обороны, они же имеют достаточно другого наступательного вооружения которым можно просто все к чертям разбомбить если надо, но да Украине они всего этого конечно же не дадут, так как "ескалация".
@max9368 Жыл бұрын
Just imagine how much good could have been done with all this money...
@flamingrubys11 Жыл бұрын
your one of those idiots... ok go to work and tell them you work for free now
@Surprised_Chicken Жыл бұрын
War is cool
@TwinTurboOnly Жыл бұрын
War sucks but virtually every innovation. Ever. Came from war. War pushes our world forwards
@cluckyx1431 Жыл бұрын
War is cool
@fgfgf396 Жыл бұрын
La guerre c'est naturel mec
@danielc2694 Жыл бұрын
Spending in weopens is like spending money in cars.. the devaluation is huge.. they get old and inefective in time.
@Cryosxify7 ай бұрын
fighters get upgraded all the time, and the missiles they carry evolve to become more and more effective.
@unnimukhathalaclashyt Жыл бұрын
6:01 waiting for entry of India🇮🇳🔥 we are top 4 IND...IND....IND
@keralanaturelover19611 ай бұрын
Shame. Waste of money. Huge pension and benefits
@unnimukhathalaclashyt11 ай бұрын
@@keralanaturelover196 poda manda
@vatsal764011 ай бұрын
@@unnimukhathalaclashytMUUHHH... InDiA , InDiA, INdiA !! Ahhhhhaa😤😭😭. Bruh just shut up.
@emi7870 Жыл бұрын
POV: If all the countries spent their money for education intead army, they would have already found new universe
@parthrabadiya4816 Жыл бұрын
that does not sound profitable and fun - somebody
@ellidominusser1138 Жыл бұрын
Age?
@Simracingisgoated Жыл бұрын
And your comment shows exactly why we need a new education system
@emi7870 Жыл бұрын
@@Simracingisgoated 🤣. English is not my native, sorry
@Simracingisgoated Жыл бұрын
@@emi7870 I was talking about how you said they would find a new universe. your english is fine😆
@andersonfisica674410 ай бұрын
Estou surpreedido com o poder bélico do Império do Brasil desde 1843,surreal !!
@Jair_RJ10 ай бұрын
Monarquia brasileira era maravilhosa
@paradiseparrots1849 Жыл бұрын
India came in battlefield after the independence from Britishers in 1947 ❤️🤗🇮🇳
@mayankkumar1837 Жыл бұрын
BJP ke ate hi 2014 se sidhe 3rd position
@amasing115 Жыл бұрын
In 1984 the indians military spending can be seen increasing, this is due to India brutally suppressing Sikhs during the 80s and 90s. During this time, Congress directly ruled Punjab instead of through a middle man which is how it is for all other provinces, a move that resembles a totalitarian state.
@χσχσ-ν3χ Жыл бұрын
@@amasing115 🤡 logic lol
@keralanaturelover19611 ай бұрын
@@amasing115waste of money😢😢
@noahsawesomevids4228 ай бұрын
Wow very impressive that we spent 86 mil in 1843 and we sure like spending a ton of money on our military
@bilboriches7216 Жыл бұрын
Last second: Ukraine entered the chat. Russia: Im dead
@MichaelDemv Жыл бұрын
True
@atvkid0805 Жыл бұрын
russian soldiers aren't even there you idiot, it's private military contractors PMC
@Sceptonic Жыл бұрын
The Mexican flag colors are inverted
@hiicyuivbi Жыл бұрын
The poor russia increase its budget in destroy ing ukraine