Graveyard of NATO Armor: Much-Touted Systems Destroyed in Ukraine!

[@marckx1290]

Incredible sincere and objective assessment, no western propaganda, and for being honest in stating that no individual system of weapons is invulnerable to a specific battefield which have distinctive unique characteristics. To say that this Nato or Russian or any one is invincible, is simple sheer ignorance. My respect to the team once again.

[@Military-TV]

Thank you for your thoughtful comment. I appreciate your respect and support!

[@bryanx590]

@@Military-TV 3 day war was not suppose to take 3 years, why lol, why so long? Russia has not begun, lol, after 3 years.

[@florinvoicu7801]

​@bryanx590 nobody said it will be 3 days . If you can find that quote made by any russian leadership about the 3 days then please pass the link here so we can all see it . For your memory refreshment it was this : " I decided to start a special military operation ,in order to demilitarise and denazificate Ukraine " end quote

[@teyrncousland7152]

@@bryanx590Stop spreading misinformation. Americans are the ones who said it would take 3 days, not Russia.

[@xszen2166]

This is anything but objective

[@merkabah2]

damn those shovels must be diamond tipped

[@k3kass195]

enchanted shovels

[@rhetorical1488]

Mithril tips powered by unobtanium chips

[@lorneiggulden7123]

Hypersonic stealth shovels 😂

[@TheAntsNest]

Fabulous Airmail Ballistic Shovels

[@wschin2108]

Just goes to show you should never ever underestimate a diamond tipped shovel. 🤣

[@nafiznastaim7491]

Dont you understand? You are facing the Russian... Not Iraq.

[@TimothyVaughan-je5du]

Or some poor farmer in Afghanistan

[@trigularity]

They are immune to understanding

[@louise_rose]

Also a classic ground war - infantry and artillery rather than massive airstrikes against a defenceless adversary without a modern air force

[@Trouble-p3t]

Or Greenland...

[@MagdolnaGulyásnéTörjék]

Nem értik! Nem akarják érteni, mert eladták Ukrajnát.

[@m-akuttner4300]

NATO armour is less about being invincible and more about providing heavy cashflow to the companies building NATO armour.

[@PaIaeoCIive1684]

Over 30 senior American politicians have shares in Military Industrial Complex corporations. No wonder they vote for perpetual war.

[@MrKerag]

as one russian soldier sayed "our equipment is built for war, their equipment is built to showoff and to sell"

[@miiiiiiiiiiick]

No tank is invincible, and no one with an ounce of sense have ever claimed they were. Defense Industry in the US combined is valued at less than one pharmaceutical company that makes soap. Ignoring this though, the US defense industry is a major employer- not only in the factories making the equipment, but the mining, transport, R&D areas, as, where possible, all US equipment is made using US materials. So, cool.

[@Stakan79]

NATO armour is about efficiency and saving lives of crew members. Soviet and Russian is about throwing turrets. 4000 turrets by now.

[@jackbarnes8037]

Right On Comrade!✊

[@petermounsey2120]

The arms manufacturers aren't concerned one bit..the more tanks, etc get destroyed the more they have to replace, keeping the shareholders happy back home.

[@MrPipisco]

Не уверен. Акции производителей западных танков сильно упали. Зачем покупать западные танки, если аналогичные российские стоят в 5 раз дешевле?

[@Its.Mine1]

@@MrPipisco Very true, why buy a multi-million dollar tank when it can be knock out with a 1000 dollar drone or less👍👌

[@MrPipisco]

@@Its.Mine1 без танков все равно пока не обойтись. Штурм без прикрытия танком на данный момент невозможен. А дрон то может и стоит 1000 долларов, но нужно научить спецов сначала и обеспечить прорыв ржб

[@TheLordFragger]

​@@MrPipiscoThis statement is not true at all.

[@l96ai]

Abrams, leopard, challenger, all using cope cages, and still got wrecked. Git gud NATO.

[@JJ03330]

Remember when they laughed at Russia for putting them on. Or when Russia made dragon teeth, all been laughing then they started to build them themselves. Another funny thing, Lithuania wa s laughing to, then they built them themselves…. Make it make sense. Looks like most of the leaders are plain childish.

[@stanthebodger5315]

Jj Dragons teeth were used in the Second World War. They are nothing new in anti tank defences.

[@furkanonal8]

@@stanthebodger5315 what the guy mean is the westerners were laughing at russians saying dragons teeth fortifications it were obeslete though it turned out they were not

[@SeaJay_Oceans]

Armor and living flesh is 1900s level warfare tech. Modern war is nanoweapons and drones. No contest between the two: it's like a well trained Roman Legion vs an Air Craft Carrier fleet.

[@JJ03330]

@@furkanonal8 That’s exactly what I meant. Sorry that some people has 0 common sense, thank you for backing me up!

[@Am-pk3zh]

this is Russia not poor arabs😂😂

[@joegibsonzulu2599]

Nato members think that they are facing sandal clad guys wielding AK47s somewhere in the rugged terrain of Afghanistan .How wrong they are.

[@tnhheidar8183]

😂😂😂😂 Terrorist Arab😂😂😂

[@SoundOfTruths]

Not Russian as well , Iran's drones 😊

[@rhetorical1488]

@@SoundOfTruths so NAfo is being trashed by 3rd world drones.🤣🤣

[@mthebold]

Westerners consistently underestimate Russian technology and strategy. It's part of the narrative. I learned the truth about Russian technology in my engineering courses: Russia designed its own ballistic missiles; America tried and failed - multiple times. We ended up having Nazi scientists and engineers do it for us. I suspect it's the same with many "American" technologies. There's a reason America imports engineering talent instead of growing its own: American culture vilifies intellectual achievement, and our schools are a joke.

[@aarontheaviationaddict3643]

So much for NATO “game-changers”….

[@μολὼνλαβέ-ψ5ξ]

Oh, the game has changed significantly - the West has lost the arms race long ago and finally came to realize it.

[@TxChristopher]

Three years into the three day special military operation and are less than a three day walk from Russia into Ukraine. So successful!

[@aarontheaviationaddict3643]

@TxChristopher And who claimed that Russia aimed to take Kiev in 3 days? Where did you get this from?

[@hotdog9262]

@@μολὼνλαβέ-ψ5ξ western equipment have been proven superior to the extreme. russia have just had much more armour to throw away:)

[@AlexisMartinez-lr4vj]

​@@TxChristopher hahahahaha the US wasted 20 years in Iraq, what did they accomplish? They los the country within 4 days to the Taliban😂 Pathetic brainswashed ball licker 😂

[@genekelly8467]

Tanks are obsolwrw-a $5000 drone can kill a $10 million tanks-case closed.

[@edi9892]

Not quite obsolete, but tanks will have to change to stay relevant. Self-propelled artillery will remain relevant for quite some time and the same goes for mobile anti-air systems. For urban combat, armoured personnel carriers and armoured fighting vehicles still make sense, even though main battle tanks will be hopeless in such conditions...

[@rmsolympic438]

Tanks are all but obsolete. No other vehicle can offer you what a tank can.

[@M3GAprincess]

Thanks literally becoming a universal truth. 10000 kamikaze drones can defeat any ground or sea unit. Forget a tank, they could take down an aircraft carrier.

[@RomanVarl]

More like $500 drones

[@ABCABC-xf5cr]

The Ukraine war exposed the quality and inferiority of western weapons that contributed significantly to the huge deaths of Ukrainian soldiers and the losses in the war. Western military trainings are also out of date.

[@elder1412]

Really; ask the Russians how many tanks, APC's and artillery systems they've lost to the inferior Western weapons. How about the number of helicopters and airplanes they've also lost. Russia has performed poorly since the beginning of their special military operation. Now they may be doing better since they're getting more drones but still Russia said it would take two weeks to take Ukraine. Here we are two plus years later and only now Russia shows some progress. I hope Trump can bring a end to this war. Nether side, especially Ukraine, can afford for this to go on any longer.

[@ABCABC-xf5cr]

@ you went out of point.

[@joeyartk]

​@@elder1412Russia is winning the land battle and gaining territory it had no intention to seize originally. And the US is successfully extending the conflict to increase the cost for Russia. It is the foolish Ukrainians that are the big losers.

[@rhetorical1488]

@@elder1412 still quoting general Miley as russian i see. 🤭🤡

[@petersaw3379]

I agree totally. All NATO Member nations are saluting the superiority of Russians war machines in their hearts 😅

[@stemup]

I still remember when the war started, and Americans were saying this is an opportunity to see how their weapons work against Russia. Results are in...they don't

[@lepiss9683]

No they do work, there are some systems that are very good like guided artillery and man portable tank and air missiles. Specialised small equipment is what has shown in the war. None of natos jets tanks or assault rifles with training will give any advantage in this war.

[@bl8danjil]

Western weapons did quite well against Russia considering Ukraine was given older weapon systems. Russia lost a lot of armor and troops though.

[@stemup]

@bl8danjil if they lost a fraction of what msm says they have, they would have had way more than 1 partial mobilization. Which they haven't in case that's what they're saying now, I gave up listening to them a long time ago

[@alekseyef1714]

Ну какой-то результат в любом случае есть , но не тот который ожидал сша и весть запад .

[@SportZFan4L1fe]

​@@bl8danjil Ukraine Mobilized 5x. Russia Mobilized One time only 300k of their 2+: Million Reserves. Who is losing Men again? And that's why there's footage all over the internet of Ukraine Forcing kidnapping men off the street and forcing them to the front at gunpoint. 🙄🤷🏻‍♂️

[@andreycham4797]

Russians say tanks are not afraid of mud, it looks like Abrams is exception to the rule

[@user-Seibr]

😊👍

[@Leo-qd7ih]

When it was announced ( 2 years ago?) that western tanks to be shipped to Ukraine, one russian high comander said "all tanks burn the same"

[@bl8danjil]

And Russian tanks are afraid of reverse speed.

[@BocaoZ]

@@bl8danjil is there reverse speed in russian tanks?

[@rmsolympic438]

That is one of the main advantage of Russian tanks over western ones, they are much lighter and have tracks designed to operate in mud

[@umtatraining]

NATO had got too cocky, after easily defeating badly trained troops and obsolete armour in Iraq and Afghanisthan. All these over-hyped weapons, like Abrams / Stryker / Challenger / Leopard etc have met their match, not only because Uraine doesn't have any airforce left to provide cover, but because their vulnerabilities have been studied and countered, using drones / UAVs - the weapons of the future. Doubt if even the much touted, multi-million dollar US supercarriers will be effective in an all-out war with another advanced adversary, like China. China's PLA has been developing drones / UAVs with far superior technology than the Iranian-supplied ones that Russia is presently using. Instead of showcasing their effectiveness, the Ukraine war has high-lighted the weaknesses of Western weapons. It is not the weapon that is so important, it is the trained soldier utilising those weapons, that makes the difference between success and failure.

[@jaromasar8404]

Usa defeated nobody, they run from Afghanistan like coward, that they are. Irak is close to Iran. They got a@@ kicked

[@brandonreimer184]

Do you really believe the Americans don't have their own drone tech they haven't let out of the bag yet?

[@kurosumomo]

Tanks just seem to be a thing of the past in the modern battlefield. I'm not following this, but I would guess Russians have lost a similar amount of their MBTs and IFVs to the same kind of drone weapons. None of the tanks were designed to be hit from the top, and oversight or just the modern development of the battlefield. That said, I don't know if any of the tanks sent to Ukraine had any APS systems installed on them, that would have a chance of smacking that drone from the sky before it gets too strike. Regardless, MBTs seem like a thing of the past without proper air cover.

[@brandonreimer184]

@kurosumomo tanks have always been vulnerable without air superiority. Absolutely nothing has changed. The only reason we see increased losses is because drones have leveled the playing field in terms of air power and the increased number of tanks in this particular battlespace. Look at Israeli tanks in the urban areas they are operating, far fewer losses because they mostly control the air. The need for a big a$$ gun on the battlefield remains.

[@elder1412]

You do realize Russia isn't fighting NATO but their fighting Ukraine which is using some NATO weapons. It's a whole different level to fight NATO itself. Look what happened during the first Gulf War against Iraqi forces using Soviet supplied weapons. Combined arms warfare is a integrated battle plan using air, land and sea power to defeat an enemy. Those forces are able to nullify and defeat enemies because they are attacking in a combined manner and not striking only certain systems in a piece meal fashion. Ukraine does not have the amount of military hardware or man power that NATO has. Also US aircraft carriers are greatly feared because of their mobility. You don't know how much force projection they have. Concerning China. When's the last time China was in a actual war? Will their troops perform like the North Koreans sent to Ukraine?

[@jim8027]

This appears to be the first video showing the affects from the other side. A very well done video.

[@joaosito68]

The first one???? Where have you being last 3 years???

[@markhirstwood4190]

*effects

[@gregmartin2455]

It's not just weapon systems; it's tactics, training, logistics, leadership, morale, and other factors. The Russians in this theater of operations are superior in many of those areas.

[@dimansionstone]

No. I never belive your comment, the main thing in a real battle is the (gross root cause) for which cause you are entering into a battle field. Russian are fighting for Russian land to prevent it from warlords but Zelenuski has given the land of Russian (Ukraine) to NATO as Taxi stand, warehouse, weapon testing Laboratory, weapons selling market, because he not Russian but he is a Jewish comedian not a civilised politcian.

[@gyulanyars6636]

Yes, yes. Russians are superior for 3 years now.

[@guentherehlen3665]

Das ist der Ukraine Ihr Problem.

[@ctcanine]

😂😂😂😂😂😂 nonsense

[@CarlSöderquist]

Haha, you are kidding!

[@zoranmrdjenovic8127]

Slava Rusiji🇷🇺✅

[@justuseyourmajicwand]

It has been known for decades the lifespan of a tank in a real battle is about 20 minutes

[@groalegroale5392]

5

[@bl8danjil]

But if you were in a Western armored fighting vehicle you were most likely to survive. Russian tanks on the other hand became an internet spectacle with turrets literally popping off.

[@jamesmoore4856]

​@@bl8danjilthat is true seen them do that from both sides not designed for the survival of the crew or comfort that's for sure lol😅

[@novkorova2774]

Ignorant fool

[@Misterioso62]

All game changers.... For Russia😂

[@hansjorgkunde3772]

There is no Tank wich can't be destroyed by a single anti tank weapon. Infantry is deployed with these tanks usually to prevent exactly that. There is in Nato also a air cover with attack helicopters and precision artillery to destroy identified targets. This work like a gearbox where one gear fit into the next. To maximize damage output and to reduce losses. Ukraine got only the tank and use them as stationary artillery, because that is what they lack most. But a tank not moving is dead metal. Why can a Leopard 2 fight against more than one target during full speed ahead and hit all targets with almost 100% precision when its not used by Ukraine ? Simple, they lack the understanding and the training to use these weapons for the purpose they have been designed for. And this is the major difference to Russian weapons. They are just weapons, reliable sturdy and foolproof. They work in cold temperatures in mud and in the summer heat. In a M1 you can blow up the hydraulics if you open and close valves in the wrong order. Who built this useless sh** ?

[@tonyharison2058]

It’s a war with no side having air superiority, things are going to get destroyed, nothing is invincible.

[@kalashosaur6088]

Abrams wasn't designed for the desert it was designed for use against the Soviets it went into service in 1980

[@christopherbong6639]

And the Abrams were destroyed by the Russians. Looks like the Abrams is useless in the dessert and also useless against Russia. The only great thing about the Abrams is they made lots of money for the MIC and all the sales hyped.

[@jaggedskar3890]

Thank you.

[@marvlombard887]

I see a lot of butt hurt people who defended NATO systems. This video is pointing out the weaknesses in these systems that's all😂. The problem is that a lot of people were bragging about the NATO equipment like they are invincible and the video is just pointing out that , this is not the case. As mentioned in this videos these systems need a lot of support to make them effective.

[@PkolGaming]

The survivability of western vs Russian mechanized equipment is obvious. You think any Russians are walking away from strikes when their ammo cooks off??

[@bl8danjil]

Oh, we know they aren't invincible. We just know they are better made. Our older, non modern weapons are still outclassing modern Russian tanks. That's actually impressive especially when US military strategy relies on airpower for spearheading which Ukraine doesn't really have.

[@marvlombard887]

@bl8danjil Then the post doesn't apply to you 😅

[@GregoryBamber]

Military equipment produced by the US MIC and other western producers ars overpriced substandard crap.

[@rudder727]

These NATO systems would normally have adequate air support if they were being manned by NATO forces. I guarantee if this armor advanced with full air support.. the Russians with their tactics from the 1940's would be severely overwhelmed. Ukraine doesn't have much in the way of air support. And I don't mean F-16's that were sent to Ukraine. NATO would have a full compliment of aircraft including AWAC's refueling, jamming, ground support, bombers, and fighters.

[@gorech2009]

Нет ни малейшего шанса победить Россию.

[@WhiteDragon-w6e]

The illusion is shattered

[@Chickenworm9394]

Welcome back to reality

[@rudder727]

There is no illusion. It is just that Ukraine cannot provide any air support. That is a key tenet of US military tactics.

[@TheAntsNest]

​@@rudder727 it was actually a Nato statement at the end of March 2022 that said Nato could not enforce a no fly zone.

[@WhiteDragon-w6e]

@@rudder727 actually it's different to that as well it's the reasons why of course and how they got to this situation

[@oldhag2881]

Tanks and aircraft carriers are becoming anachronisms. Still formidable weapons, but overcome by technology. Similar to battleships in the WWII era.

[@Its.Mine1]

Aircraft carriers a for attacking and invading thats why America has so many because its a warmongering country and Russia only 1 or 2 as America likes to go around the world invading while Russia stays close to home to defend.

[@Mieszko.Koniecpolski51]

Z poganiaczami kòz sobie radziły NATO- wske pojazdy . Z T-72,T- 80 czy BWP. Juz nie radzą. Jak z każdym przeciwnikiem o zbliżonym potencjale. Pozdrawiam z Polski 🇵🇱

[@6teeth]

Watching a tank destroyed by a drone makes me think of Samson and Goliath.

[@louise_rose]

David and Goliath, eh? :)

[@hamsterSNAKE]

Samson was the dude with the hair.

[@theophilusanokye3563]

​@@louise_rosethat's what is supposed to be but what he said still make sense , since they were both destroyed by something weaker than them.

[@normadamous]

@@hamsterSNAKE so was David Samson's barber ? i'm confused now.... 😆

[@realvoicever]

NATO asked for and Russian forces give them. That it

[@wishfulaurosa]

Russian warfare vs USA welfare

[@zebra5star925]

Game changer weapons 😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@truthgambit]

War is stupid no matter how smart the weapons. All this stuff and no one seems able to put out wild fires. I have an idea. End war and start building equipment to actually do things people need. Stop doing things that cause wars, and start doing things that make our world awesome. Yuck, I hate war. I hate thinking of all the young children dying as soldiers in a war they did not need to fight. I am old, so to me these are children dying in Ukraine and Russia. It is wrong.

[@Broformist]

Helping regular people improve their lives is the opposite of what the ruling class wants.

[@BocaoZ]

Everybody hates war. This time, you have to ask Holland, Merkel, Johnson, Poroshenko and Zelensky wth they had in their minds.

[@kjhnsn7296]

To be fair, Russia retreated from its WW2 end point in Germany and returned to Russia. Wherever Russia left, NATO occupied and is now on Russia's doorstep. Russia has had many a bad experience with the West and so has chosen to take a stand.

[@otterkarman8740]

Russians always find a way............very smart, warlike leaders, know how and what it takes when war gets nasty. Russian tech is very smart, plus adapt so quick. I always bet Russia, their hard as steel in their hearts. Deadly warriors.

[@countloco5362]

Clowns 😂

[@BocaoZ]

For the first time in history, NATO is facing a country with a proper army... and is failing.

[@gentlefush8020]

NATO is donating their old equipment, they are not taking part in the war or facing Russia currently

[@raijmondvanderijt3708]

Uraaa from Holland

[@suneshnirmalkm6349]

Nato armor fails because first time it comes in contact against much superior equipments

[@Bjoern211]

Russian equipment is not superior. that in comparison is nato equipment. but both sides are not made for drone warfare. the new german tanks will be prepared but i hope germany makes not the mistake to hand them over to ukraine.

[@cidie1]

Haha this is how you know this is a complete shill. How many tanks have Russia lost? The so called superpower against a much smaller country with much less manpower. 😁 I know you don't want to compare ru to a small country that survives very much on old equipment

[@ddr3629]

70% of "lost" tanks were repaired not so far from the frontline. Some tanks which were hit up to 20 times are still in fight. In 2022 there were 1500 tanks in fight, now it's 3500, total looses is less than repair+production+reconservation.

[@teyrncousland7152]

@@cidie1Ukraine has the backing of NATO. So if anything Russia is doing great.

[@rhetorical1488]

@@cidie1 stick to crayons in your nose. more your skill level

[@KilroyishereYT]

Abrams were not designed for the Middle East but for a probable war against the USSR. They are very heavy and require complex maintenance, because the Americans were planning combat in highly urbanized Western Europe while having technical personnel.

[@batuhancokmar7330]

Too much "NATO Apologist" tone for my taste. Abrams wasn't designed for Middle East, there was no conflict in ME in 1976. It was specifically designed to fight Soviets in exactly where they are now; eastern Europe.. So is Bradley, M113s, Challenger 2, Leopard 1/2, Marder, AMX-10, YPR-365, FV103, VAB etc. They are all operating on the territory they are designed for, fighting the exact enemy they were designed to counter: the Russians... So, please, spare us the nonsense. Also Stryker and every single MRAPs out there is supposedly designed for asymetrical warfare, that argument is flawed too. That said, I don't think any western equipment actually "failed" in their task; they are about as effective as any other good Tank/IFV/APC out there, each with their own cons and pros.. Problem was (and still is) the ridiculous hype... "Leopard 2 is a Game Changer". Come on, its just a tank. A good tank, no one is doubting that, but still, only a tank.

[@brandonreimer184]

@batuhancokmar7330 so they were designed with drone warfare in mind way back then? Think about what the reality is before you spout nonsense. None of these vehicles were designed to operate in a battlefield with a contested airspace.

[@flpmlks5181]

yet, they forgot to look at weight limits of bridges in eastern europe :D aircrafts can take of (not all but f 16 certainly) only from clean, well maintained airfields... mustache man had those fantastic dreams about wunderwaffen too. even m777 have issues with maintenance, because of it titanium frame and other technical difficulties BUT artilery munition of the west is superior, compared to russian, those shells are marvel of metalurgy, they´re much more deadly. west has same problem like germany had. fancy, overcomplicated, difficult to maintain and imposible to produce in vast numbers. last one is more due to capitalistic model of arms industry. russia has far bigger industrial base, even when it´s unnecessary in peace time. west has some very good pieces, but raw numbers just aren´t there. and cost efectivity is other big problem. yeah, you can say we have several thousands of abrams etc. but nato has multiple tanks, apc´s etc. from different countries. russia has t 72, t80, t 90. only t 80 have different engine, but they have same optics, main gun etc. russia just understand concept of full scale war better and they have much better foundation to sustain high intensity combat. diversity isn´t strenght- militarily nor. culturaly and socially :D like it was in game of thrones. what´s more one or five armies? one. because they have one leader, one goal, they are coherent and they don´t fight each other.

[@psier11]

And tactics and situation. Vehicles to be used in defense, on Western Europe with more extended communication systems, with massive air support. And mostly of them developped 40 yrs ago. And journos and their ignorance and ability to sell themselves to power elites tha main problem.

[@somerandomvertebrate9262]

Exactly. People have forgotten that these tanks and IFV's/APC's were designed to fight a very bloody battle against Warsaw Pact spearheads in Europe had WWIII broken out in the 1980's. They were expected to suffer massive casualties while knocking out even more Warsaw Pact AFV's than they lost themselves. So nobody who were around back then is surprised to see Abrams or Leopards get destroyed on the frontline in Ukraine, only surprised that so many ignoranti in the West referred to them as "invincible" in 2022 and 2023. If anything, by the time the Ukrainians launched their summer offensive in 2023, I wasn't expecting that so many would actually still be operational in 2025.

[@bergssprangare]

No, the issue here is western superiority complex vs Russia.>They said Russia is mere a gas station , Putin a car salesman amd Russian military only had shovels..THe legend of the Mighty Russian Shovel will be told for decades

[@JoeyRay-fz1qe]

Western Tanks are too heavy, too complicated just too much for combat on a long scale!

[@BocaoZ]

therefore, they are useless outside training sites.

[@JoeyRay-fz1qe]

@@BocaoZ I wouldn't really say that. All of them were designed during the Cold War Indoctrination. They were made to fight the Soviet Union and the Warsaw Pact using West Germany as the Battle Ground. They were to set up and fight defensibly using their thick armor. The ground in the West is harder while in the East it is soft, hence why they sink up in the mud while the lighter Russian Tanks don't. If you look at the tracks during WW2 most German tank were thing while the T-34 was wide. The Panther and Tiger were wide but weighted a lot more so they sunk up in the mud while the T-34 didn't!

[@ty-ger4300]

They are useless

[@JoeyRay-fz1qe]

@@ty-ger4300 Well I won't say that, they do make Great Targets don't they!😃

[@fingerprint8479]

Sardine cans with shafts! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@SportZFan4L1fe]

NATO tactics don't work without "Air Superiority." And why hasn't NATO sent in a Huge Air Force? Cuz footage of F-35's and F-22's getting blown out the sky is bad for MIC business.

[@chasseausanglier3390]

Exactly just like the F-117 Nighthawk stealth super secret aircraft shot down by Serbian SA-3 Goa missiles from1960s era in Serbia 27 March 1999

[@Grouse2275]

@@chasseausanglier3390silly comment

[@V3G4N01]

Потому что все эти самолёты будут уничтожены после первого вылета. А стоят они очень дорого.

[@vatoloco6536]

but the sun never show this

[@freddyantony3686]

😂😂😂😂the Sun is a tabloid, not a serious newspaper. The Telegraph is the same.

[@AlexanderUnit-731]

They didn' even show a single "Donetsk terrorist" or any "Donetsk terrorist acts", but they keep saying that Ukraine is conducting "anti-terrorist operation" against Donetsk.

[@rhetorical1488]

lol the daily mail is another in the british line up of toilet paper journalism

[@henryganzer4685]

all these things are not made for serious fight. the main reason they are made for is bring lots of money to the manufacturers . . .

[@ty-ger4300]

Dead on that why United States love war money

[@alekseyef1714]

Первый раз на этом канале ... Это нейтральный канал или когда-то был за Украину и западную пропаганду ? Ибо ранее очень много каналов были за Украину , а сейчас спустя года переобулись . Столкнулись с реальностью ?

[@SteelSparrowhawk]

Здесь тоже частенько дерьмом Россию поливают. Про агрессию российскую что-то лопочут.. 🤦‍♂️

[@alekseyef1714]

@SteelSparrowhawk спасибо за инфу , буду иметь ввиду .

[@edi9892]

It doesn't mean that they're garbage. We're talking of a near-peer adversary who has a numerical advantage! In addition, training, teamwork, intelligence, and support make a huge difference. You can have even the best tank get stuck in the mud and flanked by the enemy if you're careless! Still, it's another question whether Abrams or Leopard are the best tanks for the conflict. If you're not going tank vs tank, cheaper, and lighter tanks will be more cost-effective, and don't get me started on complicated repairs or super-heavy tanks getting stuck...

[@foshizzlfizzl]

The Abrams was not designed for operations in the gulf war 😂

[@viorelpiscanu9425]

Robust military hardware...maybe, still far for being enough to win victory over Moskovits... Day by day less people belive in Kiev way of doing " business"on the battlefields... PEOPLE are dying in numbers, what for!? Ukraine should preserve its statehood, this would be the key for Ukraine as a State...

[@QuintusSulpicius]

Moskovits?! ..i.. you

[@Vadim-p1d]

And who should take care of statehood in Ukraine?

[@viorelpiscanu9425]

@QuintusSulpicius This is the word given to Russians after February 2022 by Kiev, when RUAF invaded Ukraine...

[@Vadim-p1d]

@@viorelpiscanu9425 Moment: If Ukraine remains neutral.

[@raghabnpanda]

No wander the Russian tanks also suffered same problem of FPV drones. And also got inputs of their locations by USA & Europe satellite navigations... Now NATO indirectly got the same. And the invicibilities of NATO weapons came to light...

[@sharkkusul]

Its not the tank doing very well in battle or doing poorly. Its how tanks are used in a combined ground attack with infantry and air support. What can the tank itself do? Smash through enemy lines and hold the ground? It all depends on the field commanders planning and executing the attack well, with trained troops and tank crew.

[@psier11]

Tactics. And losses. If you lose about 1 mio most experienced soldiers and perhaps 5000 officers, after..... But simply here, from NATO POV, there is the aggression. So you are fighting russians, in Russia, inside their logistics, with means perhaps insufficient to defend yrself in yr logistics in western europe.

[@djgnu]

Nato got a reality check in this war, and realized their best ever equipment in the history of humankind works only on flip flop warriors, sometimes. Every game changer burning in Ukraine. Usa with that military spending is just a paper tiger, hot air show offs. Now the americans are all excuses, pathetic.

[@hainguyendong3959]

Oui je suis tout à fait d'accord avec vous, c'est la vérité, NATO ne peut pas gagner

[@tommay2561]

Did we forget WW2 info?

[@Gurowho]

What! Are you telling me when these NATO equipment is useless against the enemy it was ment for?? But look on how these weapons were so good against those Shepards and militia men in the Middle East!

[@luigipasta9496]

Suddenly the Marketing machine ran out of steam!!

[@skywire5595]

I think those drones strapped with explosive and armor piercing shell wont cost more than 150dollars .

[@СергейЛавров-ю4ш]

26

[@dennyone3931]

Urrrraaaaaa GB Rusia 🙏🏻

[@anvilbeater]

I appreciate this channel showing real unbiased reporting! ❤

[@Jim-nt7xy]

Last time Russia and France invaded Russia did not go so well either.

[@Weshopwizard]

I remember an 80s movie about arms dealers. They sold jets to competing tribes in Africa. When asked, the guy said “they don’t fly them thru just roll them down the hills at each other.” Same here.

[@Kayzef2003]

The most embarrassing thing about NATO tanks? ... They are too heavy to be used for an invasion of the country they were solely developed to invade😂😂😂

[@agungamarta6551]

The most biggest budget military in the world just end with 2 drone operator, NATO and US not ready for war

[@paulsutphin6703]

What a festival of Russian propaganda- look at the popcorn pop of every t series Russian tank.

[@oldhag2881]

Bradley has fared better than Abrams.

[@psier11]

Such a consolation for at least a trillion spent and lives lost.

[@Savage_Viking]

Both are adding to the 800,000 Russian casualties. Russian losses in material vs Nato vehicles is 20 to 1.

[@stephenaskew4346]

The story of the Abrams is even worse than stated It wasn't designed for the Desert. It was designed for West Germany. Similar conditions to Ukraine. Like the Challenger, a high tech vanity project that is I'll suited to the rigours of war.

[@luisabarca7363]

War is like a boxing match... You try to destroy your adversary, and not to be destroyed... The US and NATO are super heavyweights... Beating enemies like Iraq, Libya, Siria, Sudan, etc, was like an unfair boxing match between a super heavyweight and a bantamweight. You have an advantage of 40 kilos... Remember all that US bragging and boasting at the Iraq invasion?... “Operation Shock and Awe”. Now the US and NATO are fighting another heavyweight: Russia. But they have been in the canvas and crying in every round... And the entire world is cheering up the Russians!...

[@hunterr1ar727]

Fanatsy dreams must be your thing!!! NATO hasnt lifted a finger and Ukraine still holds this so called superheavy weight for over 3 years 😂😂😂😂

[@luisabarca7363]

@@hunterr1ar727 Ukraine in ruins, living from somebody else´s money... Half of population, 20 millions gone... 30% of its territory in Russians hands... One million dead... Defeat after defeat after defeat... And you are laughing?... NATO is fighting a coward´s war... Are you profiting from this mess?

[@ryanayala8533]

We gave Ukraine all our old shit

[@Luorawetlan]

Так дайте новое. Мы проверим его.🤣

[@xenon__47]

In war armies mostly use old shit. They dont produce 100s of tanks every year genius

[@hamsterSNAKE]

What do you think would have happened if we just spent 3 years giving ukraine all our newest shit....... We'd be out of all the new hardware. And unable to replace the high tech optics with all the electronics from china etc We could have given Ukraine every f35 we had and they still would have nothing now.

[@Savage_Viking]

True, not the upgraded armor ones we have.

[@Jay-l5t7j]

You keep thinking that buttercup, it still not going to matter, Russia is not gonna lose this war.

[@ted8526]

Brawo Rosja

[@miki-wu9uj]

In the last 40 years, anti-tank weapons have advanced much more than the protection of tanks from those same missiles. Those projectiles are now extremely precise, have enormous penetrating power (up to 1.5 meters of steel), often work according to the "fire and forget" principle, they attack from above where the armor is thinner, etc. Not to mention the use of drones. Almost all tanks, whether western or eastern, are easily destroyed. If they appear on a battlefield where there are many different anti-tank weapons, their hours and minutes are numbered, regardless of whether it is T90, Abrams, Merkava or any other.

[@sanputhesen9757]

Very nice analysis.

[@laletra5755]

this is what happens when nato{USA} armor attacks a real army not a 3rd world country

[@Atchinin-ih4wq]

They are not failing. The Western military equipement is not good. Russia's tanks run also in the muddy terrain. NATO underestimated Russia.

[@pstanyer1]

Any tank gets hit with a artillery shell or even drone may destroy any tank, one thing for sure the soldiers survived unlike any tank russia has.

[@SteelSparrowhawk]

Да что ты говоришь? Как "интересно"!

[@hamalsalam3986]

LONG LIVE RUSSIA 🇷🇺

[@LTPottenger]

The best weapons...of the 80s. That never improved only got more expensive.

[@mikehunt7888]

I don't recall anyone calling western tanks invincible.

[@josipfleis9223]

Many Western propagandists called them invincible... Many of them said that - well, now Russians will sense the edge of the Western steel ...

[@SaeedHanafi-qv6cl]

👍🇷🇺🇦🇫

[@josephkelly5218]

NATO is a tad lagging in technology

[@abdulmatinbukhari5346]

western media was beefing russian tanks in the beginning of the war now we see the truths 😆

[@bl8danjil]

Russian armor is so depleted in numbers they are running out of tanks to pull from boneyards.

[@Badboy52144]

Americans thought they were against rocket launchers😂😂😂.

[@grumpygregory3095]

The battlefield is constantly changing.

[@abeonthehill166]

This demonstrates that the Tank is now obsolete as it is easily destroyed by a $20000 drone which is only 1% the cost of a Tank !

[@nickmunk9995]

The Bradley ifv and m1a1 were designed to fight ussr in Europe

[@thebritishengineer8027]

Drones are a new element to battlefield, especially to military technology designed 10 - 15 years before the drone threat was realised. Furthermore few armoured vehicles were designed with roof armour to match the front or side, typical of an attack again of doctrines pre-Ukraine. So it's not a case of NATO technology failing, it all failed as per the losses of Russian block equipment. Designed to the same doctrines. The viewer must also realise most front line donated NATO was either end of life 2nd/3rd line or down graded. The Challengers weigh 92 when fully armoured to heavy for Ukraine.

[@nomad7734]

The Abram was designed to fight in Europe not the desert lol

[@kosu7340]

Let russians live in peace. It's Hysterical UK and America that led to this.

[@Savage_Viking]

Let Ukraine live in peace, absolutely no threat to Russia.

[@sergioluizbrito9980]

HURRA!❤ SALVE GRANDE RÚSSIA.

[@jimmyohara2601]

Russia can't even save itself 🤦. Who else can save you/them ?? 🤷 🙁.

[@pedrocosta6440]

If mud is a problem your tank sucks…

[@John-m7k5u]

In effect, NUTTO has simply handed various models of our armoured vehicles over to Russia, showing them exactly what goes into our military vehicles.

[@0Turbox]

It's war, everyone will lose stuff.

[@TheAntsNest]

& someone will lose..

[@CosminLungu-d5m]

Russia is not fighting with 1 kalasnikov and horses,he is not Afganistan ,Irak and Lybia,he is "REAL-DEAL"

[@deny.nurdin]

Your English is easy to understand for people who use it as a 2nd to 3rd language like me. Thanks. 😎

[@Military-TV]

You're welcome, I'm glad it's helpful!

[@DaveStrickland-x9g]

The big lesson here: tanks have become an obsolete and expensive tool in modern warfare.

[@guentherehlen3665]

Wonderful

[@BravoNine69]

I’m against ANY support for Ukraine at ALL.. we shouldn’t be sending anything over. That’s said. We sent over our outdated over stocked junk… most didn’t have the more advanced armor packages and other updated systems.

[@AntonioRomero-te4cb]

💪🇷🇺 Z V

[@chamberpot969]

Wunderwaffe 😂

[@Baggio10100]

Too many challenges for the UK Challengers 😅

[@AliMohamed-wd4wp]

Russia cutting edge shovels VS NATO hyper expensive toys 😎

[@GregoryBamber]

URA ROSSIYA !!!!!

[@cuz129]

If you attack a fortified enemy position that is supported by artillery and UAV's, it doesn't matter what kind of vehicle you have, you are going to die in it. That's a criticism of tactics, not of the quality of the equipment.

[@keithbuggytaylor]

The world has moved on past motorised warfare you are safer on foot than in a vehicle

[@glfan896]

Straty na wojnie są rzeczą normalną i nikt jeszcze nie wymyślił sprzętu nie do zniszczenia. Zachód jest zdumiony podatnością niesłychanie wyrafinowanego sprzętu na uszkodzenia, bo latami przyzwyczaił się do walki z prawie bezbronnymi sandalarzami, a tu trafił się technicznie równorzędny przeciwnik. Do tego taki, którego latami traktowano z góry, wierząc we własnego wymysłu legendy o tym, jaki to on dziadowski. Oj, smuteczek 🤧