Trophy of War: Russia’s Unstoppable Push to Unlock M1A1 Abrams Secrets

[@geronimo5537]

There is nothing new in the Abrams or Leopard itself that the Russians have not already known for decades. What is worth finding out is capability against their armor and studying various technologies in the tanks to counter them in the field.

[@tsugumorihoney2288]

knowing is one, but when you can test real vehicle even which are pair decades old it provide much better data, you can see how your AP rounds perform against armor, you can compare thermals and sights and etc.

[@mi1400]

I guess western tanks should use very dense barbed-wire-coils fully covering the leopard/abram etc tanks ... tank crew can use say traffic/road cone like plastic for smooth in/out ... most/all quadcopter type drones will fail .. lancent type winged ones will still remain which have kinetic force too... so the barbed wire coils should also be clamped/clipped with say 2-feet long welded posts/stems to dampen the impact of lancent like ones... lastly pieces (not shell) of say a 2-3 mm gauge sheets (any metal) will cause spring board effect even if lancent hits with full speed or atleast will cause penetrator to acquire most impact cuz of early detonation... LASTLY ... i have a tank design to keep them relevant even post ukraine war, counter drones and alot new exploits i am envisioning to come later... western militaries can take my services.

[@lexburen5932]

Thanks. This is what i wanted to say. This channel thinks russia is going to find some miracles. The only thing russia thinks, is how bad these abrams and leopards are.

[@RunPJs]

So in other words...they may learn something new

[@NPSpaceZZZ]

It turned out that modern tanks do not fulfill their main purpose: their armor cannot withstand drone strikes. How can this be? It is urgent to create a new generation of robotic unmanned tanks that are invulnerable to drone attacks. Russia is already working on this. They will be killing machines, like in the movie Terminator. Invulnerable combat robots.

[@artistphilb]

Don't think they want to "reverse engineer" the Abrams, just check it out and look for its weaknesses. They seem to have settled on medium tanks and against heavy tanks like the Challenger and Abrams

[@PortmanRd]

The same heavy tanks that get bogged down on the battlefield?

[@bonaanayaga]

I agree these heavy tanks can't be used in many places except deserts or open areas.

[@serram3604]

Во всем мире будут изучать опыт этой войны . Будут разработаны новые танки и их новое применение .

[@GaryKennedy-g7p]

Russian tanks only have 3 crew .... so need a smaller turret .... and hence smaller tank overall .... French LeClerc tank is similar to Russian tanks .... it also has an auto gunloader and 3 crew - still have the same firepower .... and are a lot more manoeuvrable

[@PortmanRd]

@GaryKennedy-g7p Ukrainian tanks only have one gear. Reverse.

[@WaVeTECH-b9z]

The Abrams and Leopard tanks themselves offer no groundbreaking surprises to the Russians, as their general designs and capabilities have been known for decades. What truly matters is understanding how these tanks perform against Russian armor and analyzing their advanced technologies to develop effective countermeasures on the battlefield.

[@warrior3614]

American tanks don't have advanced tech. it just the west likes to add too much tech which in turn is bad for the solider because once you get dependent on them it makes your skill outdated/forgotten. In Russian tanks they have high tech also but they don't make it a priority because in war it gets damaged then you have to use your own skills as a solder it more efficient to use your own skills. This is the main reason Russia makes lower tech tanks easier to repair in battle, cheaper, and faster. It's Like a calculator once you start using it yes it makes the job faster, easier, but you forget how to do basic arithmetic without it. In war your tank gets hit no so-called high tech and your screwed cant remember how to use a map without GPS cant calculate distance without a measuring device, cant repair it to difficult.

[@WhyAreYouADodo]

the advanced technologies arent included in the Abrams we gave them. depleted uranium not there nor APS. theres nothing to study besides yes its a tank with no cool secretive equipment on it

[@Fatherbouba]

Abrams, Patriot, f-16, aren't they supossed to be a gamechanger? 😂

[@londonman8246]

They are They have been used and still being used as targeting practice

[@serram3604]

Немецкий Тигр был лучше советского Т 34 . Но правила игры не изменились .

[@jnishar]

No not against worlds best tank the t90. Remember when Putin said that 😂😂

[@luckyemmanuel9725]

Yes, but the game changed them 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@reflexboxer2ndlt807]

F16 and Patriot has literally been very effective against Russia. Even though U.S. only gave them a small amount. Don’t be silly. Think logically. You think 31 Abrams will last against thousands of Russian Tanks? Let alone the 6 F16s sent to Ukraine. Yet they still hold back Russia.

[@IvanIvanov-gp3vg]

Т-90М «Прорыв» - лучший танк в мире

[@lexburen5932]

Correct

[@Brian-om2hh]

Sure it is. Some have already been destroyed or captured in Ukraine....

[@IvanIvanov-gp3vg]

@@Brian-om2hh К конце надо обязательно хрюкнуть. Это по украински.

[@lucasNZL]

Hello from New Zealand, we agree the T-90 is better 👍

[@Jim-zn9qy]

Russia has several copies of every weapon in natos arsenal. Missiles,armored vehicles, tanks etc. If they wanted real secrets they just need to play warthunder

[@jepstein3207]

War Thunder is owned by the MOD thru a Cypriot proxy lol

[@Dankseid-o1u]

Unfortunately american equipment can only fight farmers. Not an actual army.

[@Fatherbouba]

They actually failed against Afghani shepherds and vietnamese rice farmers. They're only a gamechanger in hollywood movies.

[@Brian-om2hh]

The Japanese might disagree after the Pacific campaign (which you don't seem to recall) was over.....

[@Brian-om2hh]

@@Fatherbouba And how did Russia get on in Afghanistan? I'll tell you. They lost 15'000 men in ten years...

[@Dankseid-o1u]

@Brian-om2hh Americans have never fought a war with peer or near peer opponents after WW2. The Russians have and are gaining practical experience along with Ukrainians on how to fight. America will need to catch up.

[@Fatherbouba]

If Afghanistan farmers received near a trillion in military aid like Ukraine the US wouldn't have lasted 2 weeks lmao​@@Brian-om2hh

[@Premium_Water]

Can you buy a M1A1 Abrams for self defence? Yes... in Russia :D

[@krc306]

they're half price; slightly used. Conditions vary

[@iamtesting3824]

T&C applies

[@maqyotvblog]

​@@krc306even you can buy, is this called as tank?

[@langlaisjean-claude9418]

pour tout char ""abrams" achetés cash, 2 vidanges offertes

[@mi1400]

I guess western tanks should use very dense barbed-wire-coils fully covering the leopard/abram etc tanks ... tank crew can use say traffic/road cone like plastic for smooth in/out ... most/all quadcopter type drones will fail .. lancent type winged ones will still remain which have kinetic force too... so the barbed wire coils should also be clamped/clipped with say 2-feet long welded posts/stems to dampen the impact of lancent like ones... lastly pieces (not shell) of say a 2-3 mm gauge sheets (any metal) will cause spring board effect even if lancent hits with full speed or atleast will cause penetrator to acquire most impact cuz of early detonation... LASTLY ... i have a tank design to keep them relevant even post ukraine war, counter drones and alot new exploits i am envisioning to come later... western militaries can take my services.

[@Fatherbouba]

What secrets? secrets why they suck?

[@mdshamin1039]

Russia,China and Iran never use US weapons 😂😂😂 Cry the West

[@mahirshahriarhussain5756]

(Iran uses F14 tomcats and F4s)

[@Chickenworm9394]

@@mahirshahriarhussain5756 Iran used to be on America's side (until 1979)

[@mahirshahriarhussain5756]

@Chickenworm9394 no shit sherlock.

[@mahirshahriarhussain5756]

@Chickenworm9394 Yes, Captain Obvious, sir. 🫡

[@Mieszko.Koniecpolski51]

Z pewnościa niektòre rozwiązania techniczne z M-1 mogą być przydatne czy Rosji czy Korei Pòłnocnej. Pozdrawiam z Polski. 🇵🇱

[@UnknownKiller-fj9ot]

There's nothing special about that tank. Its just a heavy garbage can For clowns...😂😂😂

[@insdmd2549]

Russia uses 5% of its army

[@denbalabol4673]

That's not true, Russia currently has 2 mil people military active personnel. Currently in Ukraine war participating 500k so it is 25%. But still to imagine they got another 75% in reserve is insane

[@steveb890]

@@denbalabol4673 🤣🤣

[@avppr3451]

@@denbalabol4673 Dude the other 75% is not in reserve. This is the active reserve. The total pool is 31 million reservists... I know, if you need to use them all you are screwed. But again, this huge army is like 1/15 of the full potential...

[@DavetjeMcAl]

If That.!😂

[@darrenbrassington7364]

Russia has 5% left you mean

[@akbmarket2308]

We were very surprised when we found out about the Abrams tank. We expected it to be much better.

[@tomalfreysr2639]

Then u know nothing about tanks. We didn't give them the current Abrams tank. And no top secret armor. That's a tank that was in storage since the 80s there bud.

[@solomonkhan7199]

The Abrams tank was first lost in Iraq. It was then that it became clear that this was not a miracle weapon.

[@fauaotuifiti4137]

Russian PEOPLE got a lot of Christmas Toys from AMERICA and EUROPEAN UNION

[@trevortrevortsr2]

That is why they only sent the A1A models

[@Mordalo]

Until now, US armor has not seen a real enemy ability since Korea. We are fed that we have the best system in the world. We don't. In a conventional war, NATO and the West would lose. If it turned nuclear, we all lose.

[@tekteam26]

Like we haven't received the latest models of the T-80, radar systems, surface-to-air missiles, electronic jammers and other late model Russian technology from the Ukrainians as part of the price for their receipt of our tanks?

[@benbo7042]

Show them. Liar

[@jakegriffiths590]

NATO fan boy in emotional free fall 😂😂😂😂😂

[@blueskynet7926]

@@jakegriffiths590 No, common sense?

[@jakegriffiths590]

@@blueskynet7926 what's common sense?

[@geronimo5537]

There is nothing new in the Abrams or Leopard itself that the Russians have not already known for decades. What is worth finding out is capability against their armor and studying various technologies in the tanks to counter them in the field.

[@RAFAELALEJO-yd9ei]

an expensive tank destroyed by $ 80.00 dolars russian drone.??

[@fredretteketet]

😂😂😂❤🎉🎉🎉

[@Mordalo]

A bit more than $80.

[@John-c4r1o]

Destroyed by Temu drone.

[@habpar6531]

You think Russian tanks are faring any different to drones? At least Western tanks don't evaporate their crews when hit.

[@John-c4r1o]

@habpar6531 where are all these western tanks? As much as it takes, as long as it takes... so where are these tanks?

[@06HM19]

Russia, why not use the world most advanced tank Armata in that war...

[@Vadim-p1d]

Armata is a firework of dust in the eyes. Yes, it has been developed, but Russia is not the Soviet Union. It has neither the capacity for production nor the strength for new infrastructure (training crews and repairmen, production of spare parts and ammunition, and so on)

[@solomonkhan7199]

Armata has been tested in combat conditions in Ukraine. This is the tank of the future, but there are few of them because they are not mass-produced. And in this war, well-known tanks are needed for large-scale battles, the crews of which do not need to be retrained.

[@Vadim-p1d]

@@solomonkhan7199 You just supplemented me with your objection. For three hundred years now, victories have depended on the economies of states, and the armed forces are only an appendage of industry.

[@reynardus1359]

Abrams biggest secret is why it costs so much.

[@ArtherFocksake]

The last thing the Russians want to do is copy the American M1A1 Abrams tank, as that would lead to a useless tank that is vastly overweight, average when it comes to fire power, generates so much heat it can be spotted from Mars, requires 50 gallons per mile requiring servicing every 34 minutes and costs 20,000 times more than a superior Russian made tank. Same goes for the Challenger II tank us Brits are coming out with the Challenger III tank the two differences being the III costs three times more than the II and the III will last 3 days on the battlefield rather than 2.

[@cideltacommand7169]

Still a 50% increase on the challanger 😂

[@adamburns2452]

The obsession with sticking their noise into everyone’s business never ends

[@johnweerasinghe4139]

The art of speaking without saying anything

[@raijmondvanderijt3708]

Beautiful news greetings from Holland. ❤️🇷🇺

[@CREvothegreater]

what became of the super secret weapon f16's?....the amazing 50yr old design jet......

[@bl8danjil]

What super secret weapon? It just replaces the older Soviet aircraft.

[@Christian-h8b]

It's M1a1 old , Desert Storm I would say! EVERYTHING could be destroyed

[@TiSIWO]

What of the French Leclerc and British Challenger?!

[@stonedaf8017]

Ah the "advanced" western tanks that have an "advanced" loader in the form of an "advanced" human loading those "advanced" shells into the breech, just like our "advanced" ancestors have been doing for centuries. This channel is truly advanced.

[@paintnamer6403]

Has the T-14 been deployed yet?

[@remypascal4872]

in history the USA did bring always Su technics into their hands, often advanced to theirs, to learn. Of course since the computer /chip times it turned. But SU/Russia has had not nearly that access even then with more shy spy counter actions.

[@amunman]

Тут много пишут - типа не узнают ничего нового, устаревшие и тд . Но я так скажу - всегда полезно иметь экземпляры для реальных тестов. Не зря же и американцы скупали десятки Т72 Советских версий в 1990е годы , хотя уже имели Т72 из Восточной Европы и Ирака.

[@brianmurray1395]

It's a super old design. Russian T14 is much better as well the T90M

[@КонстантинДеев-ф7е]

Nope, T-90”proriv” working well, T-14 just prototype at this time. We can tell what better after see T-14 armata on battlefield🫡🇷🇺 now T-90 better😊

[@solomonkhan7199]

Armata has been tested in combat conditions in Ukraine. This is the tank of the future, but there are few of them because they are not mass-produced. And in this war, well-known tanks are needed for large-scale battles, the crews of which do not need to be retrained.

[@jacekstrong4687]

Abramsa mieli Ruskie już 30 lat temu. Polski wywiad sfabrykował dokumenty, na które USA wysłały Abramsa do Turcji na testy. Czołg nigdy tam nie dotarł. Przeładowano go w Grecji na inny statek i znalazł się on w CCCP.

[@solomonkhan7199]

it's a good fairy tale, but nothing is known about it in Russia)))

[@johnweerasinghe4139]

Export. Model?

[@Ekdrink]

What would they really learn from this? I doubt this is their first time with an abrams

[@tajabdullah.malaysia]

Old hits and attacks 🎉nato cannot stand a day without crying 🎉❤ Masy'Allah Allahuakbar Permudahkan urusan kami semuanya aamiin 🎉❤

[@toddgrady7119]

The truth about the M1A1 is that it can be taking out by $2000 dollar drone. WOW It will not be a good weapon only after they are able to put 4 drone motors on it and get it to fly.

[@SRB.4S]

Of course, the Abrams and Leopard 2 tanks will be examined by Russian experts. But I really don't see what they, something that Russian experts don't already know, could find in these tanks?! These are not the first captured Abrams and Leopard 2A6?! Which, to make matters worse, on the battlefield and in a real war proved to be worse than the above-mentioned T-72B3M and T-90M. In fact, in most combat segments, the above-mentioned Russian tanks proved to be better! More precisely, both the Abrams and Leopard and Challenger 2 proved to be worse than the Russian modernized tanks T-72B3M/T-72B1MS, T-80BVM, and the new T-90M. Also, when comparing these aforementioned Western tanks with the new Chinese tanks on the T-72 tank platform. Or the Czech modernized version of the T-72M4CZ, and with the Polish PT-91... In all the crucial segments for a tank and for a real war and battlefield today, these tanks are better than the Abrams or the Leopard 2, not to mention the Challenger 2 and the T-55 is better than the Challenger 2. Some of these crucial segments for a tank on a real battlefield and in a real war are: Speed, maneuverability, agility, logistics, maintenance, maneuverability, effect on the battlefield, the possibility of using the tank as mobile artillery with a range of up to 10 km, crew training, invested and what is gained from the tank on the battlefield, greater range of the gun than 5 km, the possibility firing laser guided missiles... And what is most important is the sustainability of tanks in a real war and on a real battlefield! Where exactly the conflict in Ukraine proved that maintenance and general maintenance means the production of the tank itself and parts for it. When the Leopard 2 and Challenger, as well as Abrams in a real war, are completely unsustainable! So it is not possible to mass-produce these tanks for the first war, due to the low level of production capacity and repair of these tanks in the West as well as the price of that same production, but it is possible to mass-destroy them! And on the battlefield, they did not show any better than Russian tanks, quite the opposite! Also maintaining them in working condition is complicated and very expensive! In all of these mentioned segments when it comes to the conflict in Ukraine, and when a real war is in question! Tanks of Soviet/Russian origin have proven to be much better than Western tanks. When it comes to the price, procurement, maintenance, repair and modernization of tank tanks. The numbers are simply incredible! And here things are even worse for tanks of Western origin. We can go even further so that everyone understands. The Russians are overhauling their T-72B from scratch and modernizing it to the T-72B3M variant, the 2022 modernization model, all costing the Russian military less than $500,000. Because we have just confirmed the price of this tank, all with anti-drone protection, at the recently concluded arms fair in Russia, the export price of the T-72B3M in the latest modernization from 2022 is $550,000. Which means that for one Abrams M1A1 in the modernized version donated to Ukraine, which costs $10 million per piece, we can buy as many as 20 T-72B3M tanks?! And to make matters worse, each T-72B3M is a significantly better tank in every sense, especially when the performance on the battlefield in Ukraine is better than this version of the Abrams tank, and of course than the Leopard 2 in almost all versions from A4 to A6, the Challenger 2 is not worthy of even a comment in this comparison. By the way, in this war so far, the T-72B3M has already destroyed at least one Abrams, if not two, and about a month ago a Leopard 2A4. So, on the battlefield in Ukraine, in a real war, the T-72B3M has a significantly better performance on the battlefield than Abrams, Leopard 2 and Challenger 2. Even worse is that the Western media, massively in all mainstream media, the US and NATO media hold the whole of Europe, the US, Canada, Australia, a huge part of Asia, Africa ... Pushing the propaganda narrative that as soon as Western tanks come to Ukraine, they will be "game changers"?! When the Russians see them, they will flee to Siberia in fear, and that these same Western tanks will destroy hundreds of Russian tanks?! Because they are "so much better tanks than Russian ones, because the Russians produce tanks by taking chips from washing machines that were produced in the West, and even when they produce a tank, the new one is already defective"?! However, the war has shown exactly the opposite! That Western 3rd generation tanks are extremely unreliable, especially their opto-electronics, in a real war like the one in Ukraine. And the Ukrainians themselves say so! I always ask unreasonable people a simple question. Have you ever wondered why China and India, which are the world's military superpowers! Who can buy whatever they want for their army and not ask for the price! Or even copy whatever they want in the Chinese case... Why did these countries decide to buy a license for T-72 or T-90 tanks?! For the simple reason that they are smart people and they know what I already stated in the text. That Abrams, Leopard 2 and Challenger 2 are unsustainable in a real war, when the production and maintenance of these tanks is a question, because they are too expensive to produce and too complicated and too expensive to maintain and train the crew.... And that on the battlefield you don't get much more from them than T-72 or T-90 tanks, on the contrary! They are less reliable tanks than the Russian T-72/T-90 tanks.

[@solomonkhan7199]

That's great! Everything is absolutely correct! In the Russian segment of the Internet, there are interviews with Russian tank crews who shot down two Abrams tanks in one battle. I have only one question: if Russia gives captured Leopard and Abrams tanks to China, how soon will the Chinese flood the arms market with copies of Leopards and Abrams?

[@SRB.4S]

@@solomonkhan7199 I don't believe the Chinese want to copy Abrams and Leopards honestly because if they did, not all of their tanks would be based on Soviet/Russian platforms. I want to say that they have had the opportunity to produce copies of 3rd generation Western tanks before, but they clearly don't want to!

[@righttobeararmsetc.8492]

We gave m1 away to Ukraine but we have m2 now lol its how it goes

[@verdier2294]

am gonna go into scrap metal....who helps with collecting ...we divide the reapings...:)) here the price is 0.22 eucents ....iron ...copper silver gold electronics have to do some melting

[@Abujambishorjitsingh]

I am fully support to Russia and I love Putin

[@bubamaranovichok4901]

Unlock what? Being disappointed? Or having the laugh of their life?

[@umineko0123]

Russia has its own impressive Armata, so it wouldn't be fair to compare the M1. In this war, we've come to understand that the most important thing isn't how well tanks perform. It's how we deal with drone attacks. We've also come to realize that factors like cost, productivity, and ease of repair are often more crucial than the intricate specs of a weapon.

[@oTNTo]

When you give AI to write text at least check it later!

[@geektechpow4537]

I don't think that Russian will use those tank to improve their tank. Usually Russia and Western have opposite design mindset (Auto/Manual, Cheap to built vs super expensive to build tech...). I think the reverse engineering is mostly to see what are the weak point and how to jam the electronics of M1.

[@finscreenname]

The Tank is 30+ years old and every anti tank missile designed attacks from the top and yet they still have not fixed it.

[@cypherborg81]

thats not the version that they supposed to have ?? wtf with that

[@karlstreed3698]

The important things they are looking at is the software in the electronics. The problem is that the minute the Russians try to access the software the system will erase the software and turn itself into a brick.

[@lattehour]

what secrets there is nothing you can do to a tank to hold against modern missiles

[@Cortesevasive]

900usd fpv drone

[@Szarko32c]

How the most feared MBT became a lemon.

[@willymueller3278]

The best tank is only as good as its crew. And when Americans run out of chewing gum they' re done. 😮

[@russtorque2993]

Such tremendous results 🇷🇺👍..

[@vanroeling2930]

M1A1 is not cutting edge technology- it doesn’t have depleted uranium armor like newer US models all do

[@Premium_Water]

true. But when the Chinese copied the C-17 after acquiring all the drawings, they didn't get the remaining 10%. So they basically made some slight changes based on their own needs, what they wanted etc. Doesnt have to be a 100% replica.

[@mitropoulosilias]

yes they just gave the something, so they can excuse the billions they stole from US people to put it in their pockets in order to keep their regime

[@petermaver8466]

Love to see the look on the Russian engineer's face that works out the Abram's needs 40 litres of JP5 aviation fuel per kilometre and that the US generally pays over US$100 per litre......

[@JimRon-s5q]

Viva RUSSIA

[@skylem5373]

M1A1 Leopard-2 thats all 80s tech Russia already knows all the details, unless Ukraine did modifications on their own , who knows what they will learn, but certainly not much

[@GaryKennedy-g7p]

reverse engineering dinosaurs ? ..... I loved the ridiculous line about how they were "interested" in the manually loaded gun ..... that is the exact reason why the Abrams etc are so big in the first place - you need a 3 man turret ..... which means you need a bigger tank ..... then "Ergonomics" yeah it would be fascinating no doubt for the Russians to see how to fit 3 people into a turret ?

[@sherstovir]

I saw him in Kazan! healthy and probably expensive...

[@alexandremullermachado7762]

The ¨secret¨ is QUALITY.

[@bonaanayaga]

I believe they can't believe they built a heavy tank that can't fight in many places in the world. The Abram tank will be hopeless in sub Saharan Africa. It won't be able to move

[@kurosumomo]

I think modern MBT are the least secret things of any modern equipment. The FCS might have some secrecy, but everything else from composites to manufacturing processes is already known to any nation and most is even revealed at trade shows when they pine for buyers. There really wasn't a big breakthrough in composite for decades now, so even if the whole MBT is classified, you can easily speculate what kind of protection is has and what kind of materials it uses, and any nation can easily reproduce those these days. MBTs are slowly but surely becoming less relevant on a modern battlefield. As said, the only actual interesting part for espionage remains the electronics and software.

[@jacekstrong4687]

Nie ma niezniszczalnych czołów tylko są źle trafione. Ze szkolenia LWP (dawne czasy) : pierwszy strzał ...w transmisję. Pytam : co to ? W gąsiennicę. Aha... A potem (w unieruchomiony czołg) ile wlezie (do zniszczenia - eksplozcja/pożar). Poziom wyższy doprowadzić do kotła człgów (Leopard) i zrzucenie na nie lekkiego jądra (małego ładunku nuklearnego)

[@dvaparovoza5706]

This is the first time I've heard that advanced equipment is being removed from tanks to increase tank efficiency in combat. I understand that this is being said by a complete fool, but he also thinks that those who listen to him are even worse than him...

[@krc306]

I think they've unlocked almost every weapon and mod in the game so far.

[@stanislavt6376]

Those captured tanks are only for target practice

[@brentchristopher7363]

I don’t think they will glean anything more from what they already have.

[@alexnderrrthewoke4479]

Sorry, manual loading is obsolete. It screams expensive, cumbersome heavier, time-consuming training tank.

[@sarthakdas6059]

They will learn what ever they can learn then use it as a target to test their new anti tank weapons

[@diavolo217]

Poor Americans, their jewel M1A1 Abrams in Iraq and Afghanistan has become both a captured tank to study its technologies, but a trophy to be placed in other Western weapons museums ! Yeha Keep Going !

[@tonyt611]

US had some mig jet fighters from Russian and Russian not make news about it

[@deaddoll1361]

There aren't secrets to unlock once the hype is stripped away.

[@incbluesail3080]

Russia has the world's best Tanks. They just want to read them

[@ranar1036]

31 Schlock!

[@Ali_ON3]

Would have been more interesting, should US have sent M1A2 or at least a fully capable M1A1 (not the downgraded version)

[@WarPhotographer1974]

17 Abrams destroyed? Remind me again how many tanks Russia lost so far? 😂

[@pangaute]

What military secret? How an over technological and inefficient tank has lasted so long on the battlefield?

[@Hardverasi]

M1A1 is 1991 tech, not "cutting edge".. ruskies dont need to reverse engineere anything ,just find more weak spots for drone and atgm operators. If this was M1A2 sepv3 that would be interesting for them for sure..

[@bluelithium9808]

Secret #1- how not to build a tank.

[@Unrepentent]

The tank is 45 years old and the ones in the ukraine are export models. It doesn’t matter.

[@carlitobrigante6304]

How are NATO supplied tanks entering Ukraine without being attacked by Russian forces?

[@mageziibrahim1575]

No need for reverse engineering in that scrap,,ts done on superior weapons that have outperformed ur enemy's weapons

[@verdier2294]

Did i see any difference between Blinkey and Zelensky.....:))

[@manuxuser]

So here are the soviets informations....🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@gl8717]

Countries just need to go to Afghanistan and have a look at what Biden left behind. 😂

[@spirotrifonov7101]

Това е чиста реклама. Погледната от обратната страна. Танкове които са разгромени но технологията от които те са направени е тайна. Електрониката която е ограничена поради това тя да попадне в чужди рьце не е доставена. Искат да кажат. Да ние се изложихме но вижде това е танк който има още по добро оборудване. И ако си поръчате от нас так в танк. Ние ще го оборудваме напълно. Но ще и дали ще има резултати никой не може да го докаже. На приказки сме най добри в света. Но в реалност не сме толкова добри. Целта е само една. Да има колкото повече войни. Да вьрвят продажбите. Танковете лесно се прекриват като продукт след тяхното унищожение. Все още е най добрият в завода. Никой не трябва да знае от какво е направен. Това е тайната на льжата. Нямаш право да питаш и да присъстваш. Каквото и да сложиш в него. Накрая все ще е танк. С каквото и да го гьрмят той ще се разпадне. Важното е да има визия на танк.

[@goodday5570]

New we should not have given them our tanks

[@DavetjeMcAl]

Theyhave the dimensions of abrams for the longest time. But they didnt have the latest software updates to this particular vehicle. Now They Do, Russia is Unstoppable regardless of being able to defeat all patriot,. atcms, leopards, drone warefare, everything that is nato supplied inc f-16 are useless in russian airspace.

[@Benz2533]

Guess everyone care more about Abram and Leopard tank. No one give a damn about challenger 2 tank. 😅

[@British-ranmsansame]

🇯🇵I'm Japanese. I like the M1 tank. Thank you for the video.

[@JamboniUk]

Youre just afraid of Atomic bombs.

[@warrior3614]

You need to like your own tank the Japanese.

[@londonman8246]

So the Americans took all advantages of the tanks before giving them to Ukraine 🤣🤣🤣

[@CREvothegreater]

the Russians have amazing weapons compared to our side....

[@BablchLife]

Что там можно изучать в М1А1, древнем, как говно мамонта? Ручное заряжание орудия?! Господи, это уже отжило своё 50 лет тому назад.. Секреты устройства агрегатов? Так уже давно нет никаких секретов, википедия и инет всё и всех сдали вместе с чертежами)) Вооружение, боеприпасы?! Да не смешите!. И не нужно делать вид, что сегодня что-то уникальное стало трофеем, если только это не французский "Леклерк" или российская "Армата".

[@ObjectiveAnalysis]

The arrogance of some western commentators is staggering. Talk about grandiose narcissism and extreme gullibility 😂

[@matthewjohnson2853]

Not much to unlock, almost a 50 year old tank & the U.S. didn't give Ukraine the best Abrams tanks! Old technology with upgrades, a drone took it out! 😂

[@prilep18]

After the capture now they remuve sensitive things yes is big bullshit 🤣Slava Russia and Merry Christmas🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲

[@TrinhNguyen-nc7hj]

Those tanks technologies are 30 years old, striped of all valuables to the Russiansz

[@adjinaabrek]

American weapons are effective in movies and in the war against shepherds in slippers and dressing gowns

[@ballistic2379]

nothing learn from this old tank lol

[@TwWolf-fm9dj]

Slava Russie🇷🇺☝️😏

[@MrAce2000]

Ahahaha Americans famous words"it's our old tanks" 😂😂. The cope is REAL

[@lucasNZL]

The leopard is a better tank than the abrams, abrams is to heavy, to costly with fuel and cant drive as long as most other tanks, and it requires alot of maintenance